Connect between Cisco ME 3600X-24FS and SF300

Hi all.
I want to connect some building, while distance between them about 200-300m.
I use 3600X-24FS as core switch, and SF300 as access switch (because of low budget).
What transceiver used to connect between them?
Does anyone has other idea for this case?
Thank in advance

Similar Messages

SSO Connection Between Netweaver CE 7.2 and MDM 7.1

Hi ,
I am trying to set up SSO connection between Netweaver CE 7.2 and MDM 7.1 systems in our landscape.
But Iam not finding the MDM template in Netweaver CE to create the MDM system in System configuration tab of CE.
Please help me on how to go about to create the SSO connection between CE and MDM system.
Regards,
Anand V

Hi Shiv,
The MDM content business package MDM JAVA WD FRAMEWORK 7.1 7.11 and MDM WEB SERVICES_RT 7.1 7.11 based on Note 1471326 have been Installed on CE but the restart was not taken.
Is the frestart necessary to get the MDM template?
Regards,
Anand V

Wireless connection between D-Link WiFi router and Time capsule stopped working

We have an ISP provided D-Link wireless router (DIR-615) to which we wirelessly connected our 2Tb Time Capsule for back up and to connect a USB printer to out network. This worked perfectly for 3 1/2 years, until about a month ago, when the time capsule suddenly decided to go "off line". ie we could no longer access it or the printer via our wireless network. We had changed nothing - just one day it stopped working.
We tried to get it back online with no success. As the 2Tb Time Capsule was almost 7 years old and had had some HDD issues in the passed, we figured it had got old and died and that it was time to replace it; so we bought a new 3Tb Time Capsule, thinking this would get everything back to normal.
However much as we tried, we were also unable to get the new 3Tb Time Capsule to connect wirelessly to the D-Link wireless router. The Airport Utility did not show the D-Link wireless router or its wireless network, although we were (and are) able to see it in Systems Preferences>Networks from all our multiple devises. This in itself seemed odd. No matter what we tried, the Airport Utility would not find the D-Link wireless router and hence we could not add the 3Tb Time Capsule to the existing wireless network.
At the end of the day we got fed up with trying to add the 3Tb Time Capsule to the D-Link wireless network, and connected it via a LAN cable to the D-Link router instead. We then set it up as its own network. Worked gerat. Having done that we thought maybe the old 2Tb Time Capsule might not have been the problem after all, so we tried extending our new 3Tb Time Capsule wireless network using the 2Tb Time Capsule wirelessly. This worked perfectly! And we are now almost back to what we wanted.
So although we have a work around, this means now have 2 separate wireless networks as opposed to the original single wireless network where everything talked to everything else.
Can anyone shed any light on any of the following:-
1. Why the original wireless network connection between the D-Link router and the 2Tb Time Capsule just stopped working? Was there some software change from Apple that "decided" D-Link wireless routers were no longer secure; and therefore the TCs could no longer connect to them?
2. Why it was not possible to extend the existing D-Link wireless network using the the new 3Tb Time Capsule?
3. Is there is anyway that we can get back to a single wireless network based around the D-Link wireless router as the primary router connecting to the modem, where the 2 Time Capsules connect as "wireless satellite base stations"?

1. Why the original wireless network connection between the D-Link router and the 2Tb Time Capsule just stopped working? Was there some software change from Apple that "decided" D-Link wireless routers were no longer secure; and therefore the TCs could no longer connect to them?
A firmware update to the TC came along and you agreed to it without perhaps even noticing.. it then smashed your setup because Apple do not recommend the setup you were using and it is very poor.
2. Why it was not possible to extend the existing D-Link wireless network using the the new 3Tb Time Capsule?
Because it is such a poor setup that Apple have taken away your ability to choose it unless you know exactly what you are doing.
3. Is there is anyway that we can get back to a single wireless network based around the D-Link wireless router as the primary router connecting to the modem, where the 2 Time Capsules connect as "wireless satellite base stations"?
Yes, this I can help you with.
I have several ways around the problem.. but the first one is.. why use the DIR-615 at all.. it is not a modem.. it is a very ordinary bottom end, poor single band slow wireless router.
Why don't you simply remove the DIR-615 from the network completely.. plug whatever it is the ISP supplies you.. an ethernet connection from whatever that modem is you mentioned into the WAN port of the Time Capsule. And use the TC in some router mode.. same as the DIR-615 was setup.. dhcp or pppoe or whatever.. I doubt the TC cannot match it.
If you have issues please post a few screenshots from the DIR-615 to show how it is setup from the WAN side.. and as long as you are given the username and password or whatever the ISP uses to authenticate then chuck out the DIR-615.
Tell me if that is a goer.. if not we can work out a few other methods..
eg. Simply turn off the wireless in the DIR-615. It is poor cf the TC and there is no need for it.. with the TC in bridge only use the TC for wireless as well as wireless extend with your old TC.
Or setup roaming network where everything uses the same SSID.
Then you will have one wireless network. And it won't matter what as long as it connects.. although IMHO this is not right as the TC is such a superior router now you are wasting your new TC.

Connection between multiple domains of AD and OIM

I am trying to integrate OIM and AD (target resource) and I have 13 domains in AD. For one domain, connection between AD and OIM is established using OOTB connector.
Can someone provide me approach for connection between multiple domains of AD and OIM.
Do I need to install different connector server for different domains or OIM provides with some Connector Server cloning feature.

Hi,
this forum is for asking and answering JDeveloper and ADF related question. Your question should be asked to the FMW security forum here on OTN
Frank

The connection between my iMac (8.1) and Airport express keeps dropping out all the time., The connection between my iMac (8.1) and Airport express keeps dropping out all the time.

The connection between my iMac (8.1) and Airport express keeps dropping out all the time., The connection between my iMac (8.1) and Airport express keeps dropping out all the time.

Hi BillCilla,
If you are having intermittent but persistent drops in AirTunes via your AirPort Express, you may find the following article helpful:
Apple Support: AirTunes audio stream drops or cuts out
http://support.apple.com/kb/ta21538
Regards,
- Brenden

No Ping-Answer in Site-To-Site-Connection between Cisco 876 and CheckPoint-Firewall

Hello!
We try to establish a Site-To-Site-IPSec-connection between a Cisco 876 (local site) and a CheckPoint-firewall (remote site). The Cisco 876 is not directly connected to the internet, but is behind a DSL-Router with port-forwarding, forwarding ports 500 and 4500. The running config of the Cisco 876 is appended to this discussion thread. Unfortunately I get no output when debugging the connection with commands "debug crypto isakmp" and "debug crypto ipsec".
From the Checkpoint-firewall point of view the connection seems to establish, but there is no ping answer.
The server on the local site that should be reached from the network behind the Checkpoint-firewall has a routing entry "route -P add [inside ip-net remote] 255.255.255.0 [inside ip local]" (see also appended running config for naming of ip-addresses).
Establishing a Cisco VPN-Client connection to the same Cisco 876 router works fine.
Any help would be very much appreciated!
Jakob J. Blaette

Hi Jakob,
Adding my two cents here.
You always need to confirm that the following ports and protocol are opened:
1- UDP port 500 --> ISAKMP
2- UDP port 4500 --> NAT-T
3- Protocol 50 ---> ESP
A LAN-to-LAN tunnel will never establish a session over TCP, but it could use NAT-T (if behind NAT). Remember that a one-to-one translation is not a port-forwarding, a LAN-to-LAN tunnel does not work well unless you have a one-to-one translation for the NATted device, which I think, in your case is the Router.
HTH.
Portu.
Please rate any helpful posts and mark this post as answered.

Alternative switch to Cisco Catalyst 3750v2-24FS and 3750-24FS

I`m looking for an alternative to these two switches:
1. WS-C3750V2-24FS-S Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS Switch with 24 100FX SFP + 2 Gigabit Ethernet SFP Ports
2. Cisco Catalyst 3750-24FS (WS-C3750-24FS-S 100BASE-FX)
They are now EOL and not available.
I have a campus style network and need to be able to connect multiple 100FX fibre switches back to a central switch. The 1st unit uses 100FX SFP modules and the second has in-built 100FX ports. I`m struggling to find anything from Cisco that will give me multiple (i.e 12+) 100FX ports.
Could anyone please point me in the right direction?
Many thanks,
Paul

Hi Paul ,
Replacement for both switch is WS-C3650-48TS-S.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5528/eos-eol-notice-c51-730227.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/end_of_life_c51-687707.html
Regards
Don't forget to rate helpful posts
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

How can i connect between WS−G5484 1000BASE−SX and GLC-LH-SMD ?

Dear experts,
My customer has 6509 A-side and B-side core switches and need to migrate only 6509 B-side to Nexus.
I have some question below.
1. Customer's 6509A-side has multiple WS−G5484 1000BASE−SX and WS−G5486 1000BASE−LX links and it is connected to 6509B-side.
But customer bought only GLC-LH-SMD for Nexus migration of 6509B-side.
I understood BLC-LH-SMD doesn't support SX type, so I am worndering how i can connect between 2 different module ?
Or should i have GLC-SX-MMD for WS−G5484 1000BASE−SX links ?
2. Current Rack has LC type patch pannel from B-side to Rack A side.
But new Nexus A-side rack is located at different row and between these rack, there is only sc-type patch pannel.
So If i want to connect from LC-type to Sc-type patch pannel, how can i connect ? do i have to use SC-LC converter ?
3. Old 6509 links use many MMF cable, and new Nexus use SMF.
Between same LX/LH links, if a side use MMF and another side use SMF, how can i connect each other ?
Again new Nexus A-side rack is located at different row and between these rack, there is only sc-type patch pannel.
Please let me know in detail, Thanks in advance, I really appreciate for your help.
Jason.

Hi Leo,
Thanks of your reply.
Dear Experts,
I seek your expert's advice for another question urgently.
Please make you time and share your experiecce.
Thanks.
Jason

What is the difference in the features between Cisco prime 1.2 and Cisco prime 1.4 ?

Dears,
Please i need to know what is the difference in the features between Cisco prime infrastructure 1.2 and Cisco prime 1.4.
Already i see the release note for each one but the release indicate only the New feature for every one. so i need to know the difference between them not new features.
Wait your kind feedback plz
Regards,

Hi,
New Features and Enhancements
The following topics describe new features and enhancements in Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.4.
Management Support for WLC Release 7.5
Support for 802.11ac Module
Support for Cisco AP 700
Policy Classification Engine
FlexConnect Audit Support
Autonomous AP Support
Client Stateful Switchover
Cable Modem Monitoring
Support for Secure File Transfer Protocol
and please go through the link and check the data sheet for further clearance.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/prime-infrastructure/datasheet-c78-729879.html

Connection between CRS 1 POS interfaces and 7600 POS Interfaces

Hi,
I am trying to connect a CRS 1 POS interface to a Cisco 7609 POS interface and i keep geting the following alarms, and the line protocol i s down on both device ends
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:at_crs_01#LC/0/2/CPU0:May 1 10:42:47.363 GMT0: spa_oc48[245]: %L2-SONET_LOCAL-4-ALARM : SONET0/2/0/2: SLOS cleared.
Please help!!
Attached are the configurations on the Devices

Hello Obiora,
if the two are connected in back to back: one side provide the clock with
clock source internal
the other side should take the clock from line
clock source line
I would change one of the two in clock source line
Hope to help
Giuseppe

CPM - Cut the connection between two views - the original and the copied

Hi,
I can copy one logical view to another one.
But since then - every change in one view (the original or the other), takes place in both of the views.
How can I cut the connection between the two logical views?
Thanks,
Carmit

Hi,
Please go through the below link this may helpful to you.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c04b1b26-e7fa-2a10-298c-c8c736f6ca9e
Regards
Sudheer

Call/video not working between Cisco jabber for Windows and VCS control C40s

Hello,
I've been struggling with no luck how to make a call using Cisco Jabber for Windows 9.6.0 registered to CM 8.6.2 with intercluster ICT to another CM 8.6.2 where we have a VCS Control 7.0.2 via GK H225, and all C40s are registered as H.323.
The VCS has interworking between H323 and SIP, however not sure if there is any problem with that. Assuming it is ok, not sure either if I'm facing any interoperability issue because in my remote site I have C40 (H323 registered at VCS and SIP listening mode) and cisco jabber for windows which is SIP based.
If is not possible, would I be able to change my C40 from H323 to SIP at VCS, or have both H323/SIP registered at VCS? If so, will I need to change as well instead of GK I'll have to establish a SIP Trunk between the CM and VCS?
Another thing I do not believe either I would be able to have one VCS connected with two clusters, right?
I'm just trying to find a solution in case my current topology is not compatible, but feel free if you have any better idea to make it work.
Anyway here is what is happening:
When I make a call from my cisco jabber windows to C40 using alias number. The call is being redirected just fine to the C40 and it rings, however when someoene or the auto answer picks it up, the call dropped right away.
However, if I enabled the MTP in my CSF device, the call gets longer before dropping. I was even able to see my jabber " start video" turns green, before was grayed out all the time and the call dropped faster. I hear a fast busy tone.
I'm able to provide SDI traces, logs, diagnostic sip/h323 calls from VCS in order to know for sure if this is an incompatible issue or something I can workaround.
Let me know if someone of you are interested in read these logs or could point me on the right direction.
Thanks!

Ok,
I have looked at both logs. I have to mentinon though that you didnt
provide the log that shows the h323 setup between cucm and the VCS. This
is most likely because the call originated from a different cucm than
the ones you provided the logs from.
The call would have orginated from the first cucm in the cucm group of
this trunk: Name=RL_TRUNK_VIDEO
The cucm ip will be : 10.252.53.10.
This is the VCS log that confirms where the h323 request originated
from:
pr 10 22:50:29 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:29,187"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="54000"
Received RAS PDU:
Having said that here is my analysis of the logs that you sent..
Jabber sent an INVITE to CUCM and advertised all the codecs (audio and
video it can support)..
Observer that Jabber says it doesnt support G729 anexB
21:55:16.576 |//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message
from 10.223.20.73 on port 54677 index 90661 with 2220 bytes:
[862370,NET]
INVITE sip:[email protected];user=phone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.223.20.73:54677;branch=z9hG4bK000029d3
From: "4122107" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=00059a3c78000011000070b0
-00000e65
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Call-ID: [email protected]
Max-Forwards: 70
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 01:55:16 GMT
CSeq: 101 INVITE
User-Agent: Cisco-CSF/9.4.1
m=audio 19252 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 105 104 101
c=IN IP4 10.223.20.73
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
a=rtpmap:105 G7221/16000
a=fmtp:105 bitrate=24000
a=rtpmap:104 G7221/16000
a=fmtp:104 bitrate=32000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=sendrecv
m=video 28878 RTP/AVP 97
c=IN IP4 10.223.20.73
++++Now lets observer the capabilites exchange during h245 negotiation
between cucm and VCS++++
Here CUCM advertises its caps to VCS (afterreceiving caps from VCS)
Note that G729A, G729AB, G729 is all advertised..
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,017"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="45660"
Received H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= request : terminalCapabilitySet
capabilityTableEntryNumber 2,
       capability receiveAudioCapability :
g729wAnnexB : 6
       capabilityTableEntryNumber 3,
   capability receiveAudioCapability : g729AnnexAwAnnexB : 6
       capabilityTableEntryNumber 4,
       capability
receiveAudioCapability : g729 : 6
capabilityTableEntryNumber 5,
       capability receiveAudioCapability :
g729AnnexA : 6
++++++
After doing MSD (master slave determination, we move to the OLC phas e..
Here we see that the far end..c40 wants to use G729AB for media++++
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,783"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.224.114.11" Src-
port="11163"
Received H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= request : openLogicalChannel :
   forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1,
forwardLogicalChannelParameters
     dataType audioData :
g729AnnexAwAnnexB : 20,
     multiplexParameters
h2250LogicalChannelParameters :
+++Next VCS sends G729AB as the codec to use to CUCM+++
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,784"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Dst-ip="10.252.53.10" Dst-
port="45660"
Sending H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= request : openLogicalChannel :
   forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1,
forwardLogicalChannelParameters
     dataType audioData :
g729AnnexAwAnnexB : 20,
     multiplexParameters
h2250LogicalChannelParameters :
++++The next thing we get is an OLC reject from CUCM and this is where
th call drops++
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,790"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="45660"
Received H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= response : openLogicalChannelReject :
forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1,
   cause dataTypeNotSupported : NULL
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,790"
Module="network.h323" Level="INFO": Dst-ip="10.224.114.11" Dst-
port="11163"
Detail="Sending H.245 OpenLogicalChannelRejResponse
+++We then receive a call release from cucm with cause code of 47:
resource unavailable++++
Apr 10 22:50:32 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:32,365"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="50913"
Received H.225 PDU:
Q931
   Message Type: Release
Complete
   Call reference flag: Message sent from originating side
Call reference value: 0x7b
   Info Element : Cause
     Location: Usr
   Cause Value: Resource unavailable
   Info Element : User User
   Length = 22
Suggestions:
Change the region setting between the ICT trunk to VCS and Jabber to use
G711 and test again.

Sharing display and internet connection between a 13inch Mac Book and G4

Does anyone know whether it is possible to connect a Mac Book and a G4 Powermac with an ethernet cable and then hook them both up to the same display and ethernet internet connection?

Usually you use a router to share an internet connection and to make a local network between the computers over Ethernet or WiFi. I think it is possible to directly connect the computers without a router, but you might have to use a cross-over cable, I'm not sure how to set up a direct connection. Using a wireless router with wired ports would allow you the flexibility of using the MacBook wirelessly and the PowerMac with a wired connection. I have an Apple Airport Extreme Base Station, and it was pretty easy to set up, it plugs into my cable modem to share the internet connection.
They make hardware devices that allow you to share a docking station between more than one computer, called a KVM switch, so you can have one keyboard, video display, and mouse and switch between two active computers.
Alternately, using the network connection, you can use Chicken of the VNC, which is a virtual network computer, this opens a window, or full-screen mode, of a computer so you can operate it from another computer.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cotvnc/
You can also control a PC from the Mac using Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection.
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/otherproducts/otherproducts.aspx?pid=remotedesktopc lient
Some monitors have multiple inputs, so you wouldn't need to use a KVM switch, if for example your monitor has both DVI and VGA inputs, the front panel can select the source, so you could use a DVI adapter for the MacBook and a VGA for the PowerMac. You could still use the KM portion of a KVM switch if you wanted to use a single full-size keyboard and mouse with both computers.
http://iogear.com/main.php?loc=product&Item=GCS632U

Difference between Cisco C3750X-48P-L and C3750X-48P-S ?

what is the differance between the WS-C3750X-48P-L and the WS-C3750X-48P-S also do these all include a smartnet?

The difference is the software image licensed. The -L signifies LAN Base and the -S signifies IP Base. You can read up on the features of both from here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3750-x-series-switches/qa_c67-578933.html
All Cisco devices are eligible for SmartNet coverage - but you have to pay depending on how long and what type of service you want. All Cisco switches also come with a limited lifetime warranty now but the replacement time is usually 2-3 weeks in my experience.

TCP/UDP ports between Cisco PI 2.0 and WLC5508

Hello,
I will install Cisco PI 2.0 behind a firewall for security reason. The WLC5508 is before a firewall. Can anybody let me know which TCP/UDP ports need to be open specifically between the Cisco PI and WLC? I don't see that from the below link.
Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0 Quick Start Guide
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/prime/infrastructure/2-0/quickstart/guide/cpi_qsg.html#wp46865
Thanks,
Robert

Firewall Between the WCS and Controller or WCS and the WCS User Interface
When a PI server and a PI user interface are on different sides of a firewall, they cannot communicate unless these ports on the firewall are open to two-way traffic:
80 (for initial http)
69 (tftp)
162 (trap port)
443 (https)
Open these ports in order to configure your firewall to allow communications between a PI server and a PI user interface.
Regards
Dont forget to rate helpful posts

Connect between Cisco ME 3600X-24FS and SF300

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for