Connect ES/ES+ TG to 6708 line card ?

Hello
I need to connect ES/ES+ on 7613 to 6708 on 6513. this is my question, can i do this ? and does line protocol up in this case or not ? and is there any document about this ?
and another question that is, can i use 6513 with 6708 line card in core layer in metro ethernet network and is there any document that recommended this case ?
thank you

WS-X6xxx LAN cards will use PFC for MPLS operations.
For these cards, EoMPLS is supported, VPLS isn't.
For VPLS, you need ES, ES+ or SIP cards.
For PFC MPLS features, check this page: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/15S/configuration/guide/pfc3mpls.html
For ES20, check this page:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/install_config/ES20_config_guide/baldcfg.html#wp1584356
For ES+, check this page:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/install_config/ES40_config_guide/es40_chap6.html
Cheers

Similar Messages

LINE CARDS

HI
Dear all
I have a problem of understanting the concept of LINE CARD on a router. On our network we are running C7203 and C7209 routers. The maximum session are :
• Maximum number of IP and PPPoE subscriber sessions supported per line card is 16000.
I want to know if we buy additionnal card the number of PPPoE subscriber sessions supported will be multiplied by 2.
Here is my problem. We have have connected a DSLAM of 862 subscribers behind a C7203 router. We translate private ip addresses with a pool of 30 public ip addresses and we have a CPU usage of 72%.
We have 5 others DSLAMs connected to a switch . These 5 DSLAMs support 4500 subscribers. Is it possible by buying 3 additionnal line cards on my C7609 to have 64 000 sessions.
Also when CISCO says
• Maximum number of IP and PPPoE subscriber sessions supported per line card is 16000
does it means that in my case i have to connect each DSLAM on one particular line card?
Is it possible to connect the cable from my switch on a C7609 router (with 3 additionnal line cards ) and have a maximums PPPoE subscribers sessions of 64000
Thx

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Line cards shouldn't be an issue. (Don't recall us bumping into any line cards issues with the sup7.)
You may need to upgrade your chassis, though.

LINE CARDS AND PPPoE SESSIONS

HI
Dear all
I have a problem of    understanting the concept of LINE CARD on a router. On our network we   are running C7203 and C7209 routers. The maximum sessions are :
• Maximum number of IP and PPPoE subscriber sessions supported per line card is 16000.
I want to know if we buy additionnal card the number of PPPoE subscriber sessions supported will be multiplied by 2.
Here is my problem. We have have connected a DSLAM of 862 subscribers behind a C7203 router. We translate private ip addresses with a pool of 30 public ip addresses and we have a CPU usage of 72%.
We   have 5 others DSLAMs connected to a switch . These 5 DSLAMs support   4500 subscribers. Is it possible by buying 3 additionnal line cards on   my C7609 to have 64 000 sessions.
Also when CISCO says
• Maximum number of IP and PPPoE subscriber sessions supported per line card is 16000
does it means that in my case i have to connect each DSLAM on one particular line card?
Is   it possible to connect the cable from my switch on a C7609 router (with 3 additionnal line cards ) and have a maximums PPPoE subscribers   sessions of 64000
Thx

I have already replied in MPLS Section.

Catalyst 4510R-E and Line Card Options

I am considering purchasing the following 4510R-E switch items for installation in a new building that will go online shortly.
a) 1 x 4510R-E Chassis (WS-C4510R-E)
b) 1 x Supervisor Engine 6-E (WS-X45-Sup6E)
c) 1 x 24-Port 10/100/1000 Module (WS-X4424-GB-RJ45)
d) 6 x 48-Port PoE 803.3af 10/100 (WS-X4248-RJ45V)
We are purchasing classic line cards for item c and d initially due to budget restrictions.
Three questions:
1) What power supply should I purchase to power this configuration?
2) The 4510 will connect to two Catalyst Blade 3020 switch, each using 4gig etherchannels. Can we do this connecting to item c or do we need an additional card (the only other things attached to item c are probably a Windows storage server and domain controller)
3) Does this sound like it will give us good performance or have I missed anything?
Many thanks for any advice
Mark

1:) Do you plan to use PoE with your line cards? Make sure you plan accordingly. I would recommend using the power calculator for this.
2:)This can be done no problem. No additional equipment required.
3:) You should be fine performance wise. This is a pretty standard setup.
Cisco Power Calculator
http://tools.cisco.com/cpc/launch.jsp
HTH,
Mark

High response time on one line card in Cisco 6513 Catalyst Switch

I am facing a wierd issue with one of the line card in the Cisco 6513 switch. All the servers, desktops and trunks connected to this line card are showing high response time (>500ms) locally. But those IP phones connected to the same line card is working fine and the repsonse time is always 1ms. I am unable to find any root cause as i am not seeing any errors or logs, please help me to fidn the root cause.
Anyway i ahve a plan to reboot the line card and test it, but i am just looking for a fix that would help us to avoid the reboot.
The affected module is WS-X6548-GE-TX.
No errors for the following commands.
#sh fabric status
#sh fabric error
#sh module all
#sh module <slot>
#sh interface counter errors
#sh version:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Compiled Fri 14-Sep-07 21:50 by kellythw
Image text-base: 0x40101040, data-base: 0x42DB89D0
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
CISCOCORE-6513 uptime is 4 weeks, 4 days, 18 hours, 35 minutes
Time since CISCOCORE-6513 switched to active is 4 weeks, 4 days, 18 hours, 34 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 04:33:29 UTC Fri Feb 22 2013 (SP by reload)
System image file is "sup-bootdisk:s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF11.bin"
cisco WS-C6513 (R7000) processor (revision 1.0) with 458720K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID SAL09507GV9
SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from s/w reset
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
Bridging software.
TN3270 Emulation software.
15 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
172 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
4 Ten Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interfaces
1917K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of packet buffer memory.
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102

What supervisor are you running ?
Be aware that the 6548 module is quite heavily oversubscribed and you could be running into this ie. servers will definitely be sending a lot more data than an IP phone.
The 6548 has an 8Gbps connection the switch fabric (note this is assuming a sup 720). So you have 48 1Gbps ports going in (in = from end devices) and only 8Gbps going out (out = to the switch fabric). Each group of 6 ports shares a 1Gbps connection the switch fabric. So lets says on one of those groupings you had 6 servers with 1Gbps connections. If only three of these servers were sending out 400Mbps of data each you have contention because 3 x 400Mbps = 1.2Gbps and you only have 1Gbps to the switch fabric.
If this is the problem there are a couple of solutions -
1) you can look into how the devices are spread across the port groupings and maybe you could move things around to make the traffic more even among port groupings. However you mention servers and trunks so you could just end up with the same problem but also the phones are not working either.
2) you can look to migrate some connections off that module onto another but this supposes you have spare capacity elsewhere. If those trunk links are connected to other switches then you would defintely want to look into moving these as the 6548 was never intended to be used as an uplink module between switches.
3) you could upgrade the module to something like a 6748 (or whatever the latest is as they keep introducing new ones) which has a much better connection to the switch fabric. Again this assumes a sup720 as the 6748 would't work with a sup32.
However don't just rush into 3) without first doing some investigation work eg. what do the servers do, how much traffic are they churning out etc. Have you looked at the interface stats for each connection to see if you are getting drops etc ?
Jon

Why XL line cards required for OTV?

According to Cisco's website, there are specific types of line cards required to support OTV on N7K (N7K-8 port 10GbE with XL options, or N7K-48 port 10/100/1000 Module with XL option).
Q1: Do I have to use the physical ports on those line cards to make OTV related interfaces? Can I use logical interfaces, and use physical ports on those line cards for non-OTV connectivity, such as used as a layer 2 access port?
Q2: Since OTV feature is enabled globally, why the requirements for specific line cards in the first place? What the features/services provided by the line cards for OTV operations?
Thanks.

Has anyone seen design docs that suggest using 10-Gig ports for the OTV interfaces? I know the Q&A indicates support for all M1 line cards (not F1 or F2), but I'm wondering if there's any clearly defined design reason for not using the 1-G line cards for this (such as the N7K-M148GS-11L).
I'm basically asking if it would be recommended (for a system with no additional open 10-G ports) to purchase another 10-G blade (such as the N7K-M108X2-12L at $27), or could we do the job with spare ports on an existing 1-G card? I've been through several docs, and while none of them indicate 10-G connectivity is mandatory, I'm hoping for a reason why Cisco might be pushing/recommending this for any size of OTV deployment.
Thank you.

I want to connect my Mac Book Pro to the internet in France without any wifi connection available? Mi Fi? Sim card?

I want to connect my Mac Book Pro to the internet in France without any wifi connection available? Mi Fi? Sim card? All we have is a phone signal in this rural French location. I want to be able to Skype to states from there. We have a friend with a 3G ipad who uses an Orange sim card to do it. I would rather not have to buy an Ipad.
thanks

I found out that the data package for one month useage with MiFi is 1G. How many minutes of online time does that correspond to?

Cannot connect my mic+headphones to the sound card.any he

I can connect the mic wire to the sound card(creative sound blaster audigy 5.)?but i dont have another exit for my headphones wire, so i can talk but i cant hear anything in the headphones - the sound is coming only from the speakers.is there anyway do make the sound go bothways, to the headphones and to the speakers?i tried to connect the headphones to the motherboard soundcard but it didnt have much use....And are there any extension cables so i can extend my headphone wire and connect it to the speaker headphone exit's?Thanks for your attention people.Looking forward to your replies.

xeckuc,
Maybe you can try to get a stereo splitter adaptor to share the audio output with your speaker.
Jason

Why three flavours for line cards?

What are the main differences between modular services cards, forwarding processor cards and label switch processor cards? I'm looking for the reason why completely new names were created, i.e. what new functions were added so that MSC name had to be changed to FP or LSP.

Hello Tenaro,
LSP, MSC and FP are different line cards to address discrete functional requirements of different positions in a network.
you can compare the cards' data sheets for differences
CRS-LSP
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5763/data_sheet_c78-659947.html
CRS-FP140
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5763/CRS-FP-140_DS.html
CRS-MSC
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5763/CRS_MSC-140G.html
Regards,
/A

%ONLINE-SP-6-REGN_TIMER: multiple line cards down after config change

Hi,
I was wondering if someone could help.
I recently changed the entire configuration on two 6509 switches, and the fibre modules on slot 7 and 8 have gone down on BOTH switches. It would be easy to say that its a hardware fault but I cannot understand how module 7 and 8 can go down on both switches. Initially I thought it maybe due to IOS bug 22-33.SXI2a.bin" so I upgraded it to s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF12a.bin but it still down.
These are the actions I have carrried out to try resolve the issue:
- Reverted back to orginal configs but no luck
- Tried to use "power enable" command but the status light on both modules seems to turn red and then go off again.
- I have also tried to put one of the fibre modules into a different slot but no joy
- Upgraded the IOS from 22-33.SXI2a. to 122-18.SXF12a
I am running out of ideas.. can anyone help ? I am sure that hardware fault cannot occur on BOTH modules 7 & 8 on BOTH switches after config change.
The error in the log shows that modules "failed to bring online because of registration timer event". I understand this means that it is unable to download the image within the allocated time.. maybe I could manually copy the image onto the line card if that is possible ?? any ideas ?
Daughterboard         WS-SUP720          SAL135063V2 4.0    Ok
7 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC       SAL1419HKJK 4.1    PwrDown
8 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC       SAL1419HAG0 4.1    PwrDown
Mod                                                      Hw    Fw           Sw           Status
7 5475.d016.075c to 5475.d016.075f   3.1   Unknown      Unknown      PwrDown
8 5475.d0bb.7404 to 5475.d0bb.7407   3.1   Unknown      Unknown      PwrDown
System image file is "disk0:s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF12a.bin"
BOOT variable = disk0:s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF12a.bin,12;sup-bootdisk,1;
CONFIG_FILE variable =
BOOTLDR variable =
Configuration register is 0x2102
Standby is not present.
May 28 17:25:10.352: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 7 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)
May 28 17:25:10.452: %ONLINE-SP-6-REGN_TIMER: Module 8, Proc. 0. Failed to bring online because of registration timer event
sm(cygnus_oir_bay slot8), running yes, state wait_til_online
Last transition recorded: (disabled)-> disabled (disabled)-> disabled2 (restart)-> wait_til_disabled (timer)-> may_be_occupied (timer)-> occupied (known)-> can_power_on (yes_power)-> powered_on (real_power_on)-> check_power_on (timer)-> check_power_on (power_on_ok)-> wait_til_online
May 28 17:25:10.452: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 8 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)
May 29 11:41:16.601: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console

Would anyone know if the line cards are maybe failing due to Embedded Event Manager configuration ? The person who configured this lab has left the company so I am not sure what the EEM configurations actually mean.
The reason i am suspecting the EEM configuration is because the error in the log seems to suggest the module failed due to registration timer event.
May 30 14:47:00.366: %ONLINE-SP-6-REGN_TIMER: Module 8, Proc. 0. Failed to bring online because of registration timer event
Just trying to check all the possibilities as I have tried everything else,
event manager directory user policy "disk0:/fcp_eem"
event manager directory user repository tftp://10.11.x.x/xxx/
event manager scheduler script thread class default number 10
no event manager policy Mandatory.go_switchbus.tcl type system
event manager policy rp_test.tcl type user
event manager detector rpc ssh acl 60 event manager directory user policy "disk0:/fcp_eem"
event manager directory user repository tftp://10.11.216.145/FCPD/
event manager scheduler script thread class default number 10
no event manager policy Mandatory.go_switchbus.tcl type system
event manager policy rp_test.tcl type user
event manager detector rpc ssh acl 60

I urgently need to know how I can connect 8 thunderbolt display, I was thinking with the new mac pro will come out, but I wonder if it is possible to connect an iMac to 4GB of graphics card, but suffers from the imac. thanks

I urgently need to know how I can connect 8 thunderbolt display, I was thinking with the new mac pro will come out, but I wonder if it is possible to connect an iMac to 4GB of graphics card, but suffers from the imac. thanks

I tightened all HD screws and it didn't help. With the machine running and side of the case off, I physically stopped both the video card fan and the front case fan with my finger for a couple seconds and the noise continued. I also took all hard drives out one by one and rebooted each time. Again, the noise continued until I took out the Mac HD in Bay 1, rebooted, and I had a very quiet, silent machine. The issue is the hard drive in bay 1 that shipped with the computer, it's without a doubt causing the hum/woosh sound. I still need to know if I can safely swap the Mac HD from bay 1 to bay 4 without any issues to the operating system. I would like to try that to see if it dampens the noise but I also want to make sure this swap won't screw up my machine at all.

Can someone provide a link to the firmware download for Cat65k 67xx series line cards?

I want to check the current firmware releases on Cisco.com for line cards fitted to 6500 series switches. The only images I've been able to locate are those for the supervisor modules.
I cannot locate rommon/firmware images for the 67xx line cards, where are these on the website?

Since receiving the reply yesterday I've had a closer look at this. Attached is an excel file that shows the firmware versions for all the modules fitted.
I see that the same module type has 1 of two firmware versions, surely if this had been downloaded from the supervisor at module boot time then the same version of card would have a consistent firmware version??
E.G. the WS-X6748-SFP modules have either 12.2(14r)S5 or 12.2(18r)S1 in the same chassis.
Can someone explain this in a bit more detail please?

Docsis 2.0 and 1.1 cable modems are not detected via UBR-MC20X20V-5D line card

Hi All,
We have uBR10K series CMTS and recently installed UBR-MC20X20V-5D line card, requirement is to configure this line card to support docsis 1.1 and 2.0. Problem is after finished the configurations modems (Hitron and Motorola) are not detected by the system. means no modem mac address listing under "Show cable modem" command.
Our CMTS has the following components
ESR-PRE2: x1
ESR-PRE-MEM-FD128: x1
UBR10-DTCC: x2
UBR-MC20X20V-5D: x1
iOS version: 12.2(33)SCE3
Part of running-config as follows
cable spectrum-group 13 band 22800000 26600000
controller Integrated-Cable 8/0/0
rf-channel 0 cable downstream channel-id 145
rf-channel 0 frequency 501012500 annex B modulation 256qam interleave 32
rf-channel 0 rf-power 59.0
no rf-channel 0 rf-shutdown
interface Cable8/0/0
no cable packet-cache
cable bundle 1
cable upstream max-ports 4
cable upstream 0 connector 0
cable upstream 0 spectrum-group 13
cable upstream 0 channel-width 3200000 3200000
cable upstream 0 docsis-mode tdma
cable upstream 0 minislot-size 2
cable upstream 0 range-backoff 3 6
cable upstream 0 modulation-profile 21
no cable upstream 0 shutdown
diag output attached herewith. Please any one advice on how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi All,
We have uBR10K series CMTS and recently installed UBR-MC20X20V-5D line card, requirement is to configure this line card to support docsis 1.1 and 2.0. Problem is after finished the configurations modems (Hitron and Motorola) are not detected by the system. means no modem mac address listing under "Show cable modem" command.
Our CMTS has the following components
ESR-PRE2: x1
ESR-PRE-MEM-FD128: x1
UBR10-DTCC: x2
UBR-MC20X20V-5D: x1
iOS version: 12.2(33)SCE3
Part of running-config as follows
cable spectrum-group 13 band 22800000 26600000
controller Integrated-Cable 8/0/0
rf-channel 0 cable downstream channel-id 145
rf-channel 0 frequency 501012500 annex B modulation 256qam interleave 32
rf-channel 0 rf-power 59.0
no rf-channel 0 rf-shutdown
interface Cable8/0/0
no cable packet-cache
cable bundle 1
cable upstream max-ports 4
cable upstream 0 connector 0
cable upstream 0 spectrum-group 13
cable upstream 0 channel-width 3200000 3200000
cable upstream 0 docsis-mode tdma
cable upstream 0 minislot-size 2
cable upstream 0 range-backoff 3 6
cable upstream 0 modulation-profile 21
no cable upstream 0 shutdown
diag output attached herewith. Please any one advice on how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.

7k vPC best practice with multiple line cards?

I have a pair of 7k's that have a single line card with a 2 port vPC linked to a pair of 5k's, another 2 port vPC linked to the layer 3 VDC and a 4 port vPC used for peer link. I recently added an additional line card to the 7k’s and want to add redundancy for the new line card.  Would it be best to simply remove one of the existing ports from each vPC on line card 1 and then include a port from the new line card? For the peer link, my thought was to remove two ports from the existing port channel and then add back 2 ports from the new line card. This way line card 1 and 2 will share the ports that make up the vPC’s instead of all of the vPC ports being on line card 1. Does that make sense or is there a better way to implement line card redundancy after adding a new line card?
Also, if I want to add some of the ports on line card 2 to the layer 3 VDC. Can I run the allocate interface command without the fear of it removing any existing allocated ports?  I understand that the ports being moved/allocated to a different VDC will lose their current configuration.  I had a bad experience years ago using "switchport trunk vlan allowed" vs. "switchport trunk vlan allowed add" command so I just want to make sure the allocate interface doesn't require the "add" option! :)
Thanks!

Hi,
For adding new interface to port-channel:
1. you can shutdown the new physical interface and put all the configure as existing member interface.
2. add as port-channal member.
3. Unshut the physical interfaces (new interface- module 2).
4. Shutdown the physical interfaces (module 1) which you wanted to remove from the port-channel
Moving interface from one VDC another VDC will erase the configuration on that  interface . you could use allocate interface command to add new interface to the VDC but all the interface should be in same port group. Adding new interface to vdc will not affect existing interface configuration .
HTH
Regards,
VS.Suresh.
*Plz rate the usefull posts *

VPLS on Same Line Card

Hi dear all
Can the ES+ line card be Edge-facing and Core-facing at the same time on RSP-7609-S like the below diagram ?
i know that there is restriction on IOS XR, but i can't find any thing on IOS.
i want to know that the below case support the VPLS or not?
we want to use MPLS/VPN and VPLS at same time.
i would be appreciated if give me the reference for that.
Thank you

Hi Amir,
yes ES+ can be both core and customer (edge) facing card at the same time (even if the 2 links are on the same LC); actually there are some cases where ES+ MUST be both core and customer facing such as H-VPLS with MPLS access.
In general for all VPLS flavours you need a ES+ card (or any other card performing label imposition such as SIP-400, SIP-600, ES20, OSM) facing the core. Then depending the type of access you want to configure you have a choice of customer facing LC. i.e: any PFC based LC for basic VPLS up to ES+ (or the other mentioned above) for H-VPLS with MPLS access.
You find this (inderectly documented) on this page:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/install_config/ES40_config_guide/es40_chap6.html#wp1463854
regards,
Riccardo

Connect ES/ES+ TG to 6708 line card ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for