Connect to R/3 systems with different XI systems

Hi all,
I have the next scenario:
R/3 system A --> XI system A --> Other systems
R/3 system B --> XI system B --> Other systems
Both systems have different SLD system.
And I need create an IDOC interface between both R/3 systems.
Could somebody help me?
Can I send and IDOC to a XI system with only configure a RFC connection (SM59) or I need configure it in SLD?
Regards, Raú

Hey
are u suppose to do an IDOC(R/3 system A)-Xi-IDOC(R/3 system B) scenario,of u have to collect IDOC's from both the R/3 systems and send it to a single file?
in any case u have to maintain separate Business system and logical system name for both R/3 systems
thanx
ahmad
Message was edited by:
Ahmad

Similar Messages

HELP!! Authorization in the same laptop with different operation systems

My BF installed Win 7 operation system on his laptop yesterday and re-authorized it when he used iTunes. However, when he finished authorization, a dialog block showing that "*Including this one, you have authorised two computers out of your available 5*" appeared; what's worse, when he connected his iPhone to the laptop, it deleted all the bought apps in the iPhone, instead of synchronizating.
I also want to install Win 7 operation system, but I'm afraid that the same thing would happen again (to my iTouch).
We're quite confused that why the authorization in the same laptop with different operation systems is counted as two times. Friends who know please tell us whether this is the case.. If not, please tell us how to deal with it as we frequently re-install operation system for quicker operation.
Message was edited by: Shiwen
Message was edited by: Shiwen

It's the *operating system* that is authorised, not the particular user profile or the hardware. Before upgrading/reinstalling deauthorise and you won't run out...
tt2

IPop Use with different operating systems Windows And Mac Osx

so the quetion is this can i use my IPod with different Operatin systems?
I have a MacBook at home where i keep all my Music in and at the office i have a Windows network i would like to carry some music from home to the office using my IPod. I thought that a solution is to Partition my Ipod 40G in 2 parts and have one of them FAT so that my Windows operating system can view it.
Did any of you done it? and if so How? did you loose the use of some of the IPod functions?
let me Know if there are ways to carry music using your Ipod from the MacOSX to Windows Prof or home edition thanks!
Donatello

Your problem has nothing to do with data vs music. Music IS data. I've used my iPod for data and music since the first iPod was released. There's no reason to think the two OS versions are involved either.
Look at your usage practices - and I'm not necessarily suggesting you are abusing your computer. Has one of your computers crashed while the iPod was connected? This could cause data damage that might explain the problem. Have you ever disconnected the iPod without un-mounting it first?
You might also be creating fragmentation problems if you frequently add and remove data files while at the same time adding and removing music. One decision I made when I was using my iPod to transport lots of movies and photos for a project was to NOT make any music changes during that busy two week period.

2 SDO_GEOM columns with different coord systems

Hi
I have an intersection (traffic lights, etc.) that when shown on the map is a point and its position is stored as Lat/Long. However, when I zoom in on this intersection I need to be able to bring up a schematic (detailed plan) which will be in some cartesian coords.
My thought is to store the schematic data as a geometry collection in the same table as the rest of the data.
Is this possible?
And, are there any traps I should be looking for?

You are free to mix geometries with different coordinate systems in a table, as long as all the geometries in a given column of the table have the same coordinate system. This should support what you are trying to do with expanded levels of detail in your point features.

How to integrate the portal system with non-sap system

Hi Gurus,
How to integrate Portal system with non-SAP system?
I know few ways .......Using Usermapping UIDPW method.
Using Appintegrator .....and using Business repository objects in JCA?
Is there anyother way to integrate if so please give me the names and steps for integrating it?
Thanks in Advance,
Dharani

Hi Dharani,
You can get information from the following links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/43/d08b00d73001b4e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/thread?threadID=744043
SAP CONNECTORS:- Basically Connectors are like middlewares , that we use to connect to the backend system including Non SAP systems also. Will try to explain it to u with some examples of SAP Connectors:-
a) SAP Business Connectors:-
A middleware application based on the B2B integration server from webMethods.
The SAP Business Connector enables both bi-directional synchronous communication and asynchronous communication between SAP applications and SAP and non-SAP applications.
The SAP Business Connector makes all SAP functions that are available via BAPIs or IDocs accessible to business partners over the Internet as an XML-based service.
The SAP Business Connector uses the Internet as a communication platform and XML or HTML as the data format. It integrates non-SAP products by using an open, non-proprietary technology.
b) SAP Java Connector:-
SAP Java Connector (SAP JCo) is a middleware component that enables the development of SAP-compatible components and applications in Java. SAP JCo supports communication with the SAP Server in both directions: inbound calls (Java calls ABAP) and outbound calls (ABAP calls Java).
SAP JCo can be implemented with Desktop applications and with Web server applications.
SAP JCo is used as an integrated component in the following applications:
1) SAP Business Connector, for communication with external Java applications
2) SAP Web Application Server, for connecting the integrated J2EE server with the ABAP environment.
SAP JCo can also be implemented as a standalone component, for example to establish communication with the SAP system for individual online (web) applications.
To Know more go through,
SAP Java Connectors
II) ALE Concept:-
ALE is not restricted to communication between SAP systems, it can also be used for connecting SAP Systems to non-SAP systems.
By using IDocs as universal information containers, ALE can reduce the number of different application interfaces to one single interface that can either send IDocs from an SAP system or receive IDocs in an SAP system.
SAP certified Translator Programs can convert IDoc structures into customer-defined structures.
Alternatively, the RFC interface for sending and receiving IDocs can be used in non-SAP systems.
In both cases you need the RFC Library of the RFC Software Development Kit (RFC-SDK).
This link gives a great insight into landscape for Connectivity to Non-SAP systems:-
SAP to Non-SAP systems
III) Communication Between SAP Systems and External (Non-SAP) Systems using RFC:-
When you use RFC for communication with an external (non-SAP) system, you can also implement the SAP Java Connector or the SAP .Net Connector for the conversion of data. However, there are no specific security requirements for these components, since they only perform internal system conversion functions.
The additional security recommendations for communication with external systems in this section make particular reference to cases where an external system is used as a server (SAP calls the external system). If you use an external system as a client (the external system calls SAP), the appropriate SAP-specific security mechanisms are implemented on the SAP side.
This link explains in detail all the security considerations you need to take for connecting to an External Non SAP system like, User administration, Network Security etc.
Communication Between SAP Systems and External (Non-SAP) Systems using RFC
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Rudradev Devulapalli
Reward the points if helpful

Same Logical System Name, different Business System

Hi all,
I have a problem regarding SLD and Integration Directory. The client is requiring me to use the same logical system name for two different business systems. It seems that this is not possible in XI. When I tried activating the business system in ID, I'm getting the error, 'Logical system XXX already exists in communication component YYY'. Please help. Thanks!
IX

Hi,
You cannot have same logical name for two business systems....
Why you need it?? How will the SAP system understand which which system the message was sent for?? Some workaround like
1. Create a business system with this logical system
2. Overwrite sender/receiver business system in the receiver agreement for messages sent to 2nd business system..
This may lead to discrepancies....
Regards
Suraj

PO No range when we ink two SRM system with One ECC system

Hello Experts,
We have a client requirement to link Two SRM Systems with One ECC system.
In this case what number range we need to maintain in both SRM systems for PO.
-The number range of ECC PO should get update whenver the PO is transferred from any of the two SRM system.
-We have Extended classic scenario.
-Also PO Doc type is going to be same.
Can we handle this by increasing the buffer of the number range in one of the SRM system?
Any idea...pls help urgently.
Best Regards,
Anil
Edited by: anil.s.verma on Oct 1, 2010 4:33 PM

Hello Anil,
Being in Extended Classic Scenario (leading PO being in SRM, R/3 PO number range is concidered as external because PO number is given by SRM), the only solution for you is to:
1- give same number range interval for PO (internal in SRM system 1 and SRM system 2, external number range in R/3), e.g. 3100000000 - 3199999999
2- in SRM system 2, fill in current number with (for example) 3159999999 and let empty (or current value) in SRM system 1
3- assign, in each system for your concerned transaction type, number range as internal in SRM and external in R/3.
In this way, you will avoid overlaping in R/3 between PO numbers coming from SRM system 1 and SRM system 2
Regards.
Laurent.

Integration of BW system with R/3 system

Hi,
I have a doubt regarding integration of BW system with R/3 system.
Can we integrate both the systems without using NetWeaver-XI,
If so how can we integrate them and make the data to be interchaged between both BW and R/3 servers.
Can we load both servers in a single opreating system and simultaneoulsy run both the servers and if so what is Hardware requirement we need.
thanks and regards
konala

Hi,
I am working on ABAP-XI and now I want to move in to BW stream.
I am looking for Certification in NetWevaet2004s-BI7.0. through SAP / Seimens.
Can any body tell the approximate Cost of Certification on BI7.0 in India as well as in USA also.
Bye
Satish Kumar Reddy

XI 2.0: HowTo connect Bus.-Systems with different Releases to XI (RFC-Ad.)

Hi,
can anybody help me solving this problem:
I have Business-Systems connected to XI by RFC-Adapter. Everything works fine. Now I want to upgrade some of these Business-Systems to a newer Release --> RFCs are changing! (For both Releases I have separate Developing-Systems)
Does the following work?
- Creating a new Product-Version
- Creating new Software-Component-Versions for the new Product-Version
- Creating Namespaces with the same names (as in the older Software-Component-Versions)
- Tools/Release-Takeover for every Software-Component
- Connecting Develop-System of the new Release to the new Software-Components (Interface-Import of RFCs)--> in the new Software-Components only new RFCs can be uploaded.
- Business-Systems with old Release keep connected with old Product-Version. Business-Systems with new Release are connected with new Product-Version.
Does it work? Is this the best approach or are there other possibilities?
Thanks in advance,
Max.

Hey
are u suppose to do an IDOC(R/3 system A)-Xi-IDOC(R/3 system B) scenario,of u have to collect IDOC's from both the R/3 systems and send it to a single file?
in any case u have to maintain separate Business system and logical system name for both R/3 systems
thanx
ahmad
Message was edited by:
Ahmad

BEx Integration with different source systems

Hi All
I know we can create BEx querys on top of an infoprovider. But instead of storing data into BW and creating reports using BEx tools can we integrate BEx with the other source systems. Like Business Objects tool which can be integrated with different sources. My client wants to know whether we can integrate with BEx for the following
Support data source -- SAP BW
Support data source -- Oracle
Support data source -- MS SQL Server
Support data source -- MS Access
Support data source -- MS Excel
Support data source -- ASCII Text files
Support data source -- XML/XSD
Support data source -- Web Services
Support data source -- SAP R/3
Support data source -- BO Universe
Thanks for letting me know your opinions

Hi,
in theory you can. You will still have a virtual provider on top of your Infosource which will be connected to your datasource; thus you'll have to create the structures; you'll have to load master data as well... so not so nice solution if you think that at this stage, the storage will be the less of your costs....
How are you going to deal with R/3 data?? I mean a great advantage of BW is really when you have an R/3 behind...
I'd rather consolidate all these disparate datasources using the Visual compsoer which can get this data out of nearly an datasource and merge them in one single report; in theory again you could implement all BEx functionalities but at which cost and effort??
Weird that a customer is asking such a question because it is usually the other way around: use SAP BW data in another front-end... by the way SAP is going to acquire BO soon....
hope this helps...
Olivier.

Btrfs with different file systems for different mount points?

Hey,
I finally bought a SSD, and I want to format it to f2fs (and fat to boot on UEFI) and install Arch on it, and in my old HDD I intend to have /home and /var and try btrfs on them, but I saw in Arch wiki that btrfs "Cannot use different file systems for different mount points.", it means I cannot have a / in f2fs and a /home in btrfs? What can I do? Better use XFS, ZFS or ext4 (I want the faster one)?
Thanks in advance and sorry my english.

pedrofleck wrote:Gosh, what was I thinking, thank you! (I still have a doubt: is btrfs the best option?)
Just a few weeks ago many of us were worrying about massive data loss due to a bug introduced in kernel 3.17 that caused corruption when using snapshots. Because btrfs is under heavy developement, this sort of thing can be expected. That said, I have my entire system running with btrfs. I have 4 volumes, two raid1, a raid0 and a jbod. I also run rsync to an ext4 partition and ntfs. Furthermore I make offline backups as well.
If you use btrfs make sure you have backups and make sure you are ready to use them. Also, make sure you check sum your backups. rsync has the option to use checksums in place of access times to determine what to sync.

WF-BATCH on different systems with different email adresses and also CUA

We have several SAP systems (1x ERP, 3x IS-U, 1x CRM, 1x HR, 1x SRM, etc.) and we have a CUA system for the administration of all users on these SAP systems. On the seperate SAP systems we have workflows active which all use user(s) WF-BATCH.
Now, we have the problem that emails are sent from the workflows by the WF-BATCH user(s). But on the HR system we want to sent the mail using HR @ company.com and from the ERP system we want to sent the mail using ERP @ company.com and from the IS-U system ISU1 @ company.com, etc.etc.
But all users are maintained from the CUA so we have 1 WF-BATCH user in CUA. The emailadress is also maintained in the CUA (so changing WF-BATCH in the different SAP system with SU01 is no option).
Does anyone have any experience with this and do you have tips how to solve this?

I had a previous similar experience and I had to go and change the user in every system (although the client had CUA). In my case, I actually had to create WF-BATCH manually in every single system.

Refresh to New Server with different file system

Dear Gurus,
We are having our Production DB,Test and RMAN in 10.2.0.3. We are trying to refresh TEST database with production db with last months backups and I've few queries.
Below is the filesystems:
Prod: /u99 for backup
Test: /ttu/t99 for backup
Datafiles locations are different and I can use either "SET NEWNAME" or "DB_FILENAME_CONVERT".
My production uses catalog database RMAN.
How can we duplicate test db with production (having catalog) with different backup locations on both systems. We don't have permissions to create similar directory structure on test machine.
With this I only left with restoring the production db on test server and then renaming the database. But, I want to know, if there's any possibility with RMAN directly to refresh TEST db.
Please help me.
Regards,
Kumar

If you want copy database to different OS, the n you must use transportable tablespaces
see more : http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14191/ontbltrn.htm
if you want copy database to same OS, then you can use backup based - DUPLICATE command or disaster recovery with is you shall use RESTORE database with SET NEWNAME option.
Regards
Mahir M. Quluzade
http://www.mahir-quluzade.com

Consideration during Multiple ECC systems with One APO system for PP/DS

Hi All,
We have a scneario that Multiple ECC systems and Third party ERP systems and Legacy systems .What are the points to be considered for this scenario when using with PP/DS?

Hi,
The factors to be considered will greatly depend how the multiple ERP systems are split, if they are split on geographical aspects only (all modules in all ERP systems then no major issues) - the problem will become a little challenging when Multiple ERP are split with different modules in different instances then major thought has to go in your CIF design (the IMs has to properly though of ).
It is not a detailed explanation but just the line of thought.
Regards,
Vineet

Connect to R/3 systems with different XI systems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for