Connecting 3 RVS 4000 with VPN

Hello,
i want to connect in a triangle 3 RVS 4000 Router with VPN
i have configured 3 routers, which are able to connect to the Internet. Each of them are configured as a gateway.
i have created 2 tunnel on each router. But the vpn connection can't be established,
here is the configuration of router1 the other are configured in the same way, only the remote group setup is different
Do i have to open also some ports for the VPN , if yes which one and were
Thanks fpr your help and response
HP.Meyer

Hello,
Are you trying to ping the IP address of the clients behind the routers or the computer name? You will need to use the IP addresses only unless you add the names to the LMHOSTS file in your PCs. Also, if there is any antivirus or third party firewall software running on those clients it will block the PC from replying to pings from an untrusted subnet. For example you ping from R1 with 192.168.100.1 to a PC behind R2 that has 192.168.101.x. Because the antivirus or firewall software on the PC sees that the ping request is coming from a different subnet it will block the response. You will need to either disable any security software or add the untrusted subnet to the trusted list in that software. Sometimes it is best to test by pinging something that does not have any software, such as a printer or print server.
Please keep us updated.

Similar Messages

Drive mapping with 2 RVS 4000 over VPN

Hello
i have the following problem. I have created a VPN VPN connection with two RVS 4000 (release 2.x)
i have a local network on one site with some PC's and a NAS drive. I have shared some of the direcorys. From the other Network i can ping each device, but mapp the shared directory isn't possible.
Hope someone can give me a idea
Thansk
HP.Meyer

Hi Derek my name is Johnnatan and I am part of the Small business Support community, your case involves multiple devices and QoS features, you can contact us to open you a case and get a better help.
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html
I hope you find this answer useful,
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Cisco network support engineer.

UM175 - Not able to connect to office network with VPN

I am having trouble connecting to my office network using this wireless card, UM175, and connecting with a VPN. I have the VPN set up the same as many other computers connecting to our server. Currently when I start VZAccess, I can access the internet and everything works fine. When I start my VPN to connect to my office server, it takes multiple tries with error 691 being returned. After two or three tries it connects. I can ping my computer from the server. I can ping my router and my server from my notebook with the UM175. However, I cannot do anything with the server. I cannot access the internet, access files from the server, or access any software on the server. I contacted IT and our administrators and they tested the system and VPN and state that there is a problem with the modem UM175. Is there some setting that I must set to make this work correctly. This is an urgent matter and must be working, or I will have to purchase another type of modem.

Where are you located? I'm in the Bay Area, CA and I was using the UM175 with my PPTP VPN without any problems. However, I recently upgraded to the new 4G on Wednesday and now the PPTP VPN won't authenticate...errors on verifying user name and password. I did a packet trace and found GRE packets are being dropped. This is a Verizon issue and it appears their 4G upgrades have directly caused this problem.
There is another thread about this issue located here: http://community.vzw.com/t5/Broadband-Netbook-MiFi-Devices/LG-LTE-Modem-VPN-Not-Working/td-p/349846

RVS 4000 wont vpn

I am having a hard time using the Quick VPN client to connect into my RVS4000. I am using Windows 7 64-bit. When I try connecting I get the following error: The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait? If you click yes, the box reappears. If you click no, the current session disconnects.
I have tried opening remote management, changing the vpnserver.conf file for another IP address.
Any other ideas. I have seen many people with the problem, but non of them have worked for me.
On a second note, one of my users are using a Mac. Will QuickVPN work on Macs?
Thank you,
Daniel

Hi,
since this question is about a product in the Cisco Small Business / Linksys range, I suggest you move it to the community, where you will have a better chance of getting expert advice.
best regards,
Herbert
Moderator for the Cisco Support Community VPN section

Connecting two business locations with VPN

I'm attempting to establish a connection between two offices of a business. The first office has the VPN configured on 10.4 server, and allows external clients to connect without any problems. The only drawback is that only one connection can be established from the new location at a time, given that all clients share the same external IP (I'm fairly sure this is the reason). What I am wondering is:
Can one computer (either client or server) at the new office connect to the VPN at the first office, and then share that connection with all the clients on it's sub-net?
This would be an ideal solution for us, but I've not found anything alluding to this type of connection anywhere else in the Apple discussions pages.
Many thanks, hopefully...

OK, after a lot more searching I discovered that what I want is S2S VPN and have now found all the instructions needed to get it going. It always easier once you know what it's called!

Connecting Multiple Remote Sites with VPN Passthrough

I have several Win2003SBS sites requiring VPN passthrough from remote clients some using the VPN Connectoid supplied with the SBS (on the RWW - "Download Connection Manager". The requirement is for an DSL modem router with at least 10 tunnels which also supports GRE. The device should support ADSL2 as a minimum and SDSL is preferred.
A more detailed diagram is attached. Access to the Web Server will be required from both the LAN and WAN sides later.
Any suggestions please?

3700 Series multiservice access routers supports GRE, SDSL, ADSL.Refer the following URL for more information
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps282/products_data_sheet09186a00800921f0.html

No Internet Access with Static IP and RVS 4000

I have an RVS 4000. I have several PC's to which I have assigned static IP addresses. I have recently upgraded most of the PC's to Win 7 (64) machines. I updated the firmware on the RVS4000 to 1.3.3.5 in conjunction with this. After such update (and actually before as well) I could not assign a static IP address to a PC and have access to the internet. It connects fine to my LAN, just no internet access. This is also affected on several other machines running Win XP and Win 2003 Server, so it's not just this computer.
I have:
     1. Shut down (powered off/unplugged) everything, router, DSL modem, switches, server, etc.
     2. As I said firmware is current.
     3. Yes, DNS servers and gateway, subnet, etc. are all correctly specified on the PC.
     4. Router is set for gateway mode.
     5. Set to only IPV4.
The only way it allows internet access is to use DHCP. I've even tried taking the IP address via DHCP and manually assigning the DNS servers and that works fine, but as soon as I assign a static IP internet access is immediately gone.
There must be something I'm missing, but I can't seem to find it.
Everything worked fine prior to the conversion of the Win 7 machines, i.e. I had several PC's with static IP's and no problems.
Any thoughts appreciated.

As an addendum, if I turn off the Firewall (internet access policy to disable) it will allow the static IP computer to have internet access. I have the DHCP range set to be .5 - .54 and am using a static ip outside this range. The Internet access policy is to restrict those PC's getting IP via DHCP.

All RVS-4000's with firmware versions less than 1.3.2.0

Hi,
For those of you without the time to explore the Cisco site. I thought you guys might want to know about the following vulnerability. Which is fixed in the latest firmware version 1.3.2.0 for the RVS-4000:
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Small Business Video Surveillance Cameras and Cisco 4-Port Gigabit Security Routers Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
Document ID: 111641
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100421-vsc
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100421-vsc.shtml
Revision 1.1
Last Updated 2010 MAY 19 2030 UTC (GMT)
For Public Release 2010 APR 21 1600 UTC (GMT)
Software Versions and Fixes
To determine the software version running on a camera, administrators can click the "About" tab at the top-right of the device user interface. The software version information can be obtained on the System Status page under the "Status" tab.
The latest camera software can be downloaded at http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/Redirect.x?mdfid=282414029 ( registered customers only) .
The software version of the RVS4000 is displayed on the main router page displayed after users log in.
The latest RVS4000 software can be downloaded at http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/pub/Redirect.x?mdfid=282413304 ( registered customers only) .
When considering software upgrades, also consult http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt and any subsequent advisories to determine exposure and a complete upgrade solution.
In all cases, customers should exercise caution to be certain the devices to be upgraded contain sufficient memory and that current hardware and software configurations will continue to be supported properly by the new release. If the information is not clear, contact the Cisco Small Business Support Center or your contracted maintenance provider for assistance.
Product
First Fixed Version
PVC2300
1.1.2.6
WVC200
1.2.2.0
WVC210
1.1.0.15
WVC2300
1.1.2.6
RVS4000
1.3.2.0
Bruce

Yes, I posted this same information in the Video Surveillance section a few weeks ago. it was actually a Partner on the
community who found this and brought it to our attention and we fixed it.
Thanks for cross posting here, since you are right in it also effected this router.
And a big thank you for taking the time to collaborate some very useful information with the community. I have noticed your recent posts and I think they are well writen, helpful, and well organized. I also like your idea of turning some threads into solutions documents and resource labs perhaps.
If you would ever like to post something of that natire, you may also. Just creat a document with your findings.
Steve

Fed up with VPN connection failures

Cant get a brand new laptop with built in wireless to get a VPN connection with a BEFW11s4 router. Internet is fine. An older laptop works fine. This new labtop even works beautifully with a wireless adapter,not the built in.
Called Linksys tech support line and they wouldnt even check anything. Basically dismissed me and said its the computer (did I mention is brand new??)Now I read all the problems people are having with VPN and their routers and I cant believe they lied to me.
(Mod note: Edited post. Non-technical content. Thanks!)
Message Edited by JOHNDOE_06 on 08-12-2006 11:10 PM

What do you use for the VPN connection? IPSEC? If you only are using the passthrough function on the router, it can only allow 1 IPSEC session at a time. If you are also using other VPN softwares for that, you may need to open up ports 1723 500 50 51 and 47. This is because your router firewall maybe the cause. Try that first on a static IP for that wireless card. Try to also check if the "wired " connection to your VPN works before going wireless, you would need to do this first regardless of any brand of router...ayt?!
"The war between heaven and hell depends on the choices we make, and those choices require sacrifice. That's the test"

JMS doesn't work with VPN connection on weblogic8.1

          Hi:
          We have used JMS topic on weblogic 7.x and we use both LAN and VPN connection.
          However, when we switch to weblogic 8.1, although it works fine when using
          LAN connection,
          it does not work when using VPN connection. We tried three different machines,
          got the same
          error.
          The error is:
          weblogic.jms.common.JMSException: Error creating connection on the server
          at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
          ConnectionFactory.java:160)
          at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createTopicConnection(JMSCon
          nectionFactory.java:95)
          at com.dynamex.decs.common.jms.DecsSubscriber.initialize(DecsSubscriber.
          java:59)
          at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.initRMI(OrderEntr
          y.java:1714)
          at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.<init>(OrderEntry
          .java:124)
          at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.main(OrderEntry.j
          ava:3180)
          Caused by: java.rmi.MarshalException: CORBA COMM_FAILURE 1398079697 No; nested
          e
          xception is:
          org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209 completed:
          No
          at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ShutdownUtilDelegate.mapSystemExceptio
          n(Unknown Source)
          at javax.rmi.CORBA.Util.mapSystemException(Unknown Source)
          at weblogic.jms.frontend._FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.connectionCreat
          eRequest(_FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.java:106)
          at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
          ConnectionFactory.java:139)
          ... 5 more
          Caused by: org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209 completed:
          No
          at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.purge_calls(Unknown Sou
          rce)
          at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.handleInput(Unknown
          So
          urce)
          at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.messages.MessageBase.callback(Unknown
          Source)
          at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.processRequest(Unknown
          Source)
          at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.processInput(Unknown
          So
          urce)
          at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ReaderThread.run(Unknown Source)
          Does anybody have the experience? Can anybody give a hint?
          Thanks,
          Tony


Hi Tony,
          Given that the thick jar works, I would classify the problem
          as a bug - not a missing feature. The thin jar is contracted
          to be just as capable as the thick jar. My guess is that
          the bug is likely in IIOP but perhaps could be in JMS.
          Contact customer support (this forum is not maintained by
          customer support). Meanwhile, you can post your info
          to the IIOP newsgroup to see if they can help.
          You asked how long it would take to fix? That depends
          on bug priority (set by the customer) and bug complexity,
          but its usually measured in days or weeks (not months).
          You can speed up the process by giving support your
          logs and stack traces, as well as a simple reproducer,
          and telling them you are willing to try out a prototype
          patch. But before going through extra trouble, just give
          them the logs/stack traces, in case it is a known issue
          for which there is already a fix or there is a fix in progress.
          Tom
          tony yang wrote:
          > Tom:
          >
          > Thanks,
          > We actually use t3. However, in terms of weblogic 8.1 doc, t3 transparently
          > uses iopp. So t3 or iopp both fails over VPN connection.
          >
          > After replacing with full weblogic jar as you suggested, it works.
          >
          > However, we really want the thin client because we have huge amount of client
          > deployments.
          >
          > The other developers here also noticed other problems beside JMS problem
          > when using VPN connection and thin client jars.
          >
          > We guess full weblogic.jar uses real t3 instead of iiop.
          >
          > Seems that iiop does not work well over VPN connection.
          >
          > Could you give some estimate of when we can have the new thin client jars
          > to support VPN connection (even not official release)?
          >
          > Tony
          >
          > Tom Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >>Hi Tony,
          >>
          >>At first glance I don't know what is going on, and can only
          >>make some random suggestions. Perhaps try
          >>the t3 protocol (rather than iiop protocol) if you are using iiop
          >>URLs to connect to JMS. If you are using the new 8.1 thin
          >>client jars, try switching back and using full jar instead.
          >>Perhaps try posting to the IIOP newsgroup.
          >>
          >>Tom, BEA
          >>
          >>tony yang wrote:
          >>
          >>
          >>>I also have the log from weblogic server:
          >>>
          >>>weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherException: Could not register a HeartbeatMoni
          >>>orListener for [weblogic.iiop.IIOPRemoteRef@745152c4] for weblogic.jms.C:dal603
          >>>t05:rcy:-l91
          >>> at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherWrapperState.addPeerGoneListener(D
          >>>spatcherWrapperState.java:563)
          >>> at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherManager.dispatcherAdd(DispatcherMa
          >>>ager.java:106)
          >>> at weblogic.jms.dispatcher.DispatcherManager.addDispatcherReference(Dis
          >>>atcherManager.java:196)
          >>> at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory.connectionCreateInternal(F
          >>>ConnectionFactory.java:413)
          >>> at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory.connectionCreateRequest(FE
          >>>onnectionFactory.java:385)
          >>> at weblogic.jms.frontend.FEConnectionFactory_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown
          >>
          >>Sour
          >>
          >>>e)
          >>> at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:466)
          >>> at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServer
          >>>ef.java:108)
          >>> at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:409)
          >>> at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(Authenticat
          >>>dSubject.java:353)
          >>> at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java
          >>>144)
          >>>@
          >>>
          >>>
          >>>"tony yang" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>>
          >>>
          >>>>Hi:
          >>>>
          >>>> We have used JMS topic on weblogic 7.x and we use both LAN and
          >>>>VPN connection.
          >>>> However, when we switch to weblogic 8.1, although it works fine
          >>>>when using
          >>>>LAN connection,
          >>>>it does not work when using VPN connection. We tried three different
          >>>>machines,
          >>>>got the same
          >>>>error.
          >>>> The error is:
          >>>>
          >>>>weblogic.jms.common.JMSException: Error creating connection on the
          >>
          >>server
          >>
          >>>> at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
          >>>>ConnectionFactory.java:160)
          >>>> at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createTopicConnection(JMSCon
          >>>>nectionFactory.java:95)
          >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.common.jms.DecsSubscriber.initialize(DecsSubscriber.
          >>>>java:59)
          >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.initRMI(OrderEntr
          >>>>y.java:1714)
          >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.<init>(OrderEntry
          >>>>.java:124)
          >>>> at com.dynamex.decs.client.orderentry.swing.OrderEntry.main(OrderEntry.j
          >>>>ava:3180)
          >>>>Caused by: java.rmi.MarshalException: CORBA COMM_FAILURE 1398079697
          >>
          >>No;
          >>
          >>>>nested
          >>>>e
          >>>>xception is:
          >>>> org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209 completed:
          >>>>No
          >>>>
          >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ShutdownUtilDelegate.mapSystemExceptio
          >>>>n(Unknown Source)
          >>>> at javax.rmi.CORBA.Util.mapSystemException(Unknown Source)
          >>>> at weblogic.jms.frontend._FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.connectionCreat
          >>>>eRequest(_FEConnectionFactoryRemote_Stub.java:106)
          >>>> at weblogic.jms.client.JMSConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(JMS
          >>>>ConnectionFactory.java:139)
          >>>> ... 5 more
          >>>>Caused by: org.omg.CORBA.COMM_FAILURE: vmcid: SUN minor code: 209
          >>>>completed:
          >>>>No
          >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.purge_calls(Unknown
          >>>>Sou
          >>>>rce)
          >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.handleInput(Unknown
          >>>>So
          >>>>urce)
          >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.messages.MessageBase.callback(Unknown
          >>>>Source)
          >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.MessageMediator.processRequest(Unknown
          >>>>Source)
          >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.IIOPConnection.processInput(Unknown
          >>>>So
          >>>>urce)
          >>>> at com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ReaderThread.run(Unknown Source)
          >>>>
          >>>>
          >>>> Does anybody have the experience? Can anybody give a hint?
          >>>>
          >>>> Thanks,
          >>>>
          >>>>Tony
          >>>
          >>>
          >

I cannot print to my photosmart 7510 when connected to work with VPN

When I try to print to my printer while connected to VPN, I get an error that the software could not communicate with my printer. The IT department where I work has configured the VPN so that traffic to my local LAN is allowed (does not go through the tunnel). I had no problem printing to my old printer when connected with VPN (old printer was a photosmart 2510 connected via wireless network).
These symptoms lead me to believe that the printer software is attempting to connect to the internet when I send a print job to my local printer. Why is it doing that? What settings do I need to change to make it stop so that I can print while connected with VPN?

But I don't understand why the internet connection that my printer has comes into play when I'm sending a print job from my PC to my printer over my local network. I am not using the web services at all for that particular function.
At least I shouldn't be - I don't know what the HP print software installed on my PC is doing under the hood. The software shouldn't have to access the internet to send a print job locally. Nor should my printer have to access the internet in order to receive the print job from my PC.
What exactly is the printer or the print software accessing the internet for when I send a print job from my PC to my printer over my local network?

Connection lost with VPN enabled

I have a server with two NICs, one public internet and one domain intranet. I'm trying to configure this server as a NAT and VPN "edge" device. I am able to configure it as NAT-only, and everything works perfectly. All computers on the private
network have internet access through it, and I'm able to ping it from outside computers.
When I change my NAT service to a "NAT and VPN" service (using RRAS -> "configure and enable routing and remote access"), I lose the ability to ping that server from outside and when I try to connect to the VPN I get an error
"". It's like by configuring it as a VPN server it has blocked any kind of incoming connection, including those that it's designed for (VPN connections).
If I disable the Windows Firewall entirely, it starts working again. I've checked, and the Ping rule is allowed (the file/printer share echo one), and HTTPS/443 is as well (my VPN is a SSTP), so I don't understand why that would make a difference. Any thoughts
on why this might be happening?

Hello,
I've been putting together a new domain network, and just about have it set except for one final issue. I have a Remote Access server that I have configured for SSTP VPN. It has two NICs, one public/internet facing and the other private/intranet facing.
On the network I also have a DNS/DHCP/ADDS server and a NAT router server that has a different public internet connection and acts as the network's default gateway.
The issue I'm having is with configuring the VPN server's network adapter settings. I have two scenarios:
- configure private adapter with static IP address and manually entering the subnet/DNS (and leaving the gateway blank, since it also has a gateway on the public adapter). If I do this, then it won't let me configure a DHCP Relay Agent in RRAS, and although
I can connect to the VPN on a client, the client doesn't have internet access through the VPN.
- configure private adapter as "obtain an IP address automatically". If I do this, then the DHCP Relay Agent configures itself properly, but for some reason when I try to connect to the VPN from the client I get an "Error 0x8007274C: A connection
attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time..."
I tested a work-around where I set the VPN server's private adapter to static IP, connected the client to the VPN, then changed the server's private adapter to "Obtain automatically", let it re-identify, and it worked fine (I had internet access
on the client after that). Obviously, that's not a usable solution though. Any ideas why neither of these configurations work properly, or perhaps suggestions of a different configuration that might?

After upgrading on ios 6 i have problems with vpn connection..pls help if someone have the same problem

problem with vpn connection after upgrading on ios6.pls help

I've never been able to share FaceBook posts nor seen the option using the iOS FaceBook app regardless the FaceBook app and iOS version. I can Like and I can Comment, and if I select a link or video to view under iOS 6, I can use the Share option for the link or video, but not for a post.

RVS 4000 Email responses that need addressing

I have been bounced around between Cisco and Linksys for months….
I have two simple questions… One I know the answer on… the second, I haven’t a clue…
I have corresponded with 12-15 people at Linksys, and Cisco…
Their last answer is I should contact you…. So… Here goes…. The 16th person I’m requesting this information from….. (I can’t believe that Linksys/Cisco can’t answer these simple questions!)
Seeing that I've been checking for new firmware and IPS downloads from the Cisco site for months now, and not seeing any new downloads......
And Seeing that I'm getting nagging emails that my IPS Signature is too old, Please Update it!!!!
And Seeing that I'm still getting emails that I don't understand from the RVS 4000: -IPSEC EVENT: KLIPS device ipsec0 shut down
and I can't seem to understand How or Why it is happening, and have read manual cover to cover, and all the FAQ's, and can't upgrade it because there is no current software......
I sent the following email to [email protected] :
Hello. Have an RVS4000 Router, being used as a Gateway...
I have emails enabled, so that I'll be informed whenever there is greater than a set level of threats.... However...
If I check the logs, there are no threats... Yet....
I keep getting the following emails:
Your Signature Version is beyond 143 days. Please Update it!
I've also been getting the following emails:
-IPSEC EVENT: KLIPS device ipsec0 shut down
I'm using V1.40 IPS signature, and V1.2.11 firmware....
Yet I keep getting these emails...
I can't update the IPS Signature Version if you don't provide it!!! And you aren't!
Secondly, WHAT THE HECK DOES: "-IPSEC EVENT: KLIPS device ipsec0 shut down" MEAN????
May I suggest that the next version of firmware have options to disable the IPS "Nags" if you are not planning on writing any more code?
And, What the Heck does: "-IPSEC EVENT: KLIPS device ipsec0 shut down" mean?
Sincerely
Jan Janowski

V1.41 IPS file has been released!!!
Version: 1.41     Total Rules: 1098
In this signature, we addressed the exploits/vulnerabilities and applications
as below:
-EXPLOIT MS Video ActiveX Control Stack Buffer Overflow
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Microsoft DirectShow.
The flaw is due to the way Microsoft Video ActiveX Control parses image files.
An attacker can persuade the target user to open a malicious web page to exploit
this vulnerability.
-EXPLOIT Oracle Database Workspace Manager SQL Injection
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities exist in Oracle Database Server product.
The vulnerabilities are due to insufficient sanitization of input parameters
in the Oracle Workspace Manager component. A remote attacker with valid user
credentials may leverage these vulnerabilities to inject and execute SQL code
with escalated privilegesof SYS or WMSYS account.
Support P2P application named uTorrent up to version 1.7.2.
Signature content for 1.41
========================================================================
New Added signature(s):
1053635 EXPLOIT MS Video ActiveX Control Stack Buffer Overflow -1
1053636 EXPLOIT MS Video ActiveX Control Stack Buffer Overflow -2
1053632 EXPLOIT Oracle Database Workspace Manager SQL Injection -1
1053633 EXPLOIT Oracle Database Workspace Manager SQL Injection -2
1053634 EXPLOIT Oracle Database Workspace Manager SQL Injection -3
Modified signature(s):
1051783 P2P Gnutella Connect
1051212 P2P Gnutella Get file
1051785 P2P Gnutella UDP PING 2
1051997 P2P Gnutella Bearshare file transfer with UDP
1052039 P2P Gnutella OK
1052637 P2P Foxy Get file
Deleted signature(s):
1050521 Worm.Klez.E1 - 1
1050522 Worm.Klez.E1 - 2
1050523 Worm.Klez.E1 - 3
1050524 Worm.Klez.E2 - 1
1050525 Worm.Klez.E2 - 2
1050526 Worm.Klez.E2 ¡V 3
1050536 Worm.Blaster.B - 1
1050537 Worm.Blaster.B - 2
1050538 Worm.Blaster.B - 3
1050539 Worm.Blaster.C - 1
1050540 Worm.Blaster.C - 2
1050541 Worm.Blaster.C - 3
Number of rules in each category:
========================================================================
DoS/DDoS 51
Buffer Overflow: 241
Access Control: 92
Scan:   41
Trojan Horse: 62
Misc:   3
P2P:   40
Instant Messenger: 121
Vrus/Worm: 410
Web Attacks: 37
No Problem updating it, and the date reports Correctly!!!
THANK YOU!!!

RVS 4000 HTTP mgmt interface hangs @ Port 80 & DHCP stops working

This is the RVS 4000
Firmware version 1.3.3.5
STAR 9202 Chipset
64 MB DRAM
8MB Flash
DOS, Block WAN Rq, Remote mgmt all OFF
IPSec Tunnel none used
Internet connection is DHCP
LAN is set to DHCP with several Static devices defined
DMZ is dsabled
Functionining as a gateway
Time is set via NTP & the NRC
IPV4 Only
Everything is pretty much dedault except for QoS
Trust mode is Port, set to 4, 4, 4, 1
( Port 4 has a Linksys ATA plugged into it for VOIP services )
SIP Port Forwarding is enabled for 5060
Every day or so the Router becomes unresponsive to the HTTP mgmt interface, as well as it no longer offers DHCP services.
When this happens the only remedy is to power reboot.
Everthing comes back online just fine, however, the LOGS are initilaized so no data to figure out what`s going on.
My next step is to setuo a syslog server and have the logs copied out.
Anyone see this kind of behavior before ?
Any ideas ??
( No, I have no Torrents running at all, but I do have several devices like AppleTV, PS3s etc that run streaming Video plus I have the SPA3102 )
Thanks Derek

Hi there Vijay !
I cannot upgrade to that version of Firmware as my RVS4000 is a V1, not a V2.
Is there some way I can change it such that it will load the newer Firmware ?
This is the error I receive when trying to upgrade anyway :
"Upgrade file is not the correct type or version for this device.
Upgrade failed.
Please obtain the correct file and try again."
Otherwise the newest firmware I can load is 1.3.3.5
( which seems to have this problem )

Connecting 3 RVS 4000 with VPN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for