Connecting two iChat servers

I am hoping someone can help with an issue I am having getting two iChat servers to talk. We have two locations that are currently using our iChat server in location A. I am attempting to setup a new iChat server in location B. The idea is to have these two servers talking so that if we lose connection between locations the folks at location B can still chat amongst themselves.
Both servers are Xserves, both configured identical. I do have the new iChat server working (location B), I can connect with a client and see My Buddies, but My Buddies are greyed out and I am unable to chat with them. All of My Buddies are online on the iChat server at Location A. I have uncommented the "s2s" section in the Jabber.xml file, but still cannot get the two servers to talk. Anyone been down this road before and know what I am missing? I know we are not blocking the ports between locations. Unfortunately, I cannot find any documentation that is not basically an overview, I am not sure how iChat "discovers" other servers. Any help is very much appreciated.
Derek
G5 Xserve   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

iChat server is a re-branded version of Jabberd14.
XMPP servers use DNS to discover each other. SRV records are preferred, but they will fallback to A records if SRV are not available.
I'm not familiar with Jabberd14 so following the link Defcom(UK) gave or asking in the Collaboration Services forum (http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=700) would be advisable if you have any more questions.
Hope that helps.

Similar Messages

  • Why connect two dhcp servers with different IP addresses?

    
    so for an assignment at college we had to configure a router connected to two switches which both had a server connected to them.
    the computers were connected via dhcp to either server however each side had a different IP. we have now been asked to justify as to why two servers were used with different IP which I cannot quite produce a business orientated answer.
    I can understand connecting two dchp servers on same IP to increase fault tolerance but I do not understand using two separate IP addresses.

    Hi,
    Does “using two separate IP addresses“ mean 2 subnets which are connected by router？
    If you have separately configured 2 DHCP servers on the 2 subnets, and want 1 of the 2 DHCP servers to provide fault tolerance for the other. You need to use an RFC 1542–compliant router, or DHCP relay agent, in order to forward DHCP broadcast traffic.
    If there is any misunderstanding about your question, please correct. 
    Best Regards,           
    Eve Wang                                                                             
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Connecting two Central Servers??

    Mohan,
    More info may be beneficial.
    If you are trying to share service objects across two environments, you will
    need to create
    a reference partition. If the two different Central Servers are truly on two
    different machines,
    you can connect their environments.
    If it's a matter of having your app on one server and the database on another,
    you can
    use SQLNET and connect using TNS NAMES.
    The forte manuals can tell you how to create a reference partition, connect
    environment,
    etc.
    Hope this helps somewhat.
    Peggy Adrian
    Eli Lilly and Company
    [email protected]
    ---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Lynn Adrian/AM/LLY on 01/12/98 01:09
    PM ---------------------------
    MOHAN CHICKMAGALUR <[email protected]> on 01/12/98 01:13:40 AM
    Please respond to MOHAN CHICKMAGALUR <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Connecting two Central Servers??
    Dear Friends,
    Wish U all avery happy new year. In our office we have 2 groups
    working on two different Forte Central Server, say FCS-A & FCS-B. FCS-A
    has the Oracle Database. We now want the clients connected to FCS-B to
    access the Oracle Database. How do I connect these two???
    Thanks in Advance for the help
    mohan
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

    I have heard about connecting 2 environments. I have never tried it
    myself. Here is how you do it.
    As long as your second environment has an environment visible service
    object and your first environment does not have such an SO with the same
    name, you can specify in the FORTE_NS_ADDRESS environment variable of
    the first environment, the address for both the environments. This is
    what I have seen in some examples
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=env1:5000;env2:5000;env3:5000 and so on.
    The control will query each environment for the SO.
    Hope this helps. Remember, I have not tried it, so I cannot authenticate
    it.
    Venkat J Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, January 12, 1998 7:32 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Subject: Connecting two Central Servers??
    To: [email protected] @ Internet
    cc: [email protected] @ Internet
    From: [email protected] @ Internet
    Date: 01/11/98 10:13:40 PM PST
    Subject: Connecting two Central Servers??
    Dear Friends,
    Wish U all avery happy new year. In our office we have 2
    groups
    working on two different Forte Central Server, say FCS-A & FCS-B.
    FCS-A
    has the Oracle Database. We now want the clients connected to FCS-B to
    access the Oracle Database. How do I connect these two???
    Thanks in Advance for the help
    mohan
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

  • Connecting two distant servers via a common WAN Internet connection.

    Hi all,
    I have two servers located in two different countries. For example Server A (Windows 2003 with Active directory) is located in Singapore. Another Server B (also Windows 2003 Server with Active Directory) is located in Kuala Lumpur. Both computers are connected to Internet via local ISP (WAN connection with dynamic IP) to respective countries.  There is few local users at each places which are connected to local servers at both places with LAN.
    I would like to connect these two servers togather via WAN (Internet- may be tunnelling, VPN, I don't know much what are other technologies) My objective is to connect both Server A and Server B so that I can keep track of active directory information, user management and authentication. Please let me know how can I achieve that? What are needed and what configuration and addition device, server needed. Please give me simple, detailed cost effective methods.
    Thanks.

    First you want to get static IP's and then you can setup an IPSEC tunnel or site to site VPN.  Then you will want to creat a trust between the 2 domains if they are in different forests.  Then you can add your user account to a universal group (forest functional level must be at Server 2003 level) for enterprise management.
    James Goodwin - Senior Technical Instructor & Network Infrastructure Expert
    MCT, MCP+ I, MCTS:Server 2008, MCTS: SCCM, MCTS:Vista
    MCSA:S, MCSE:S, MCITP:SA, MCITP:EA , MCITP:ES, CCNA,
    CCSI(# 32018),C|EH, C|HFI, C|EI, HDSA, A+, Network+, i-Net+, Server+, Security+
    My Blog:http://thattrainerguy.blogspot.com/

  • Connecting Two webapplication servers to one backend

    Hi Gurus,
    We are using MAM 3.0 version on SAP Netweaver 7.0. Can we connect one more Webapplication server  parallely with exising server to the samebackend. Two webapplication servers in parallely with one backend. Is this possible? could you please give us some documents so that it would be very helpful for us.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Satish

    Hi Domas,
    As pointed our by Holger, this is supported for inbound flows where your use case is to read (pull) some information from SAP into SharePoint. But use cases like reporting and workflow which publishes some items in SharePoint you cannot have the same ECC system.
    But if you intention is only for DEV landscape setup and want to save a VM image and still want to support reporting & WF scenarios, then you could also create a new client which is the copy of your existing clients in the same ECC system.
    Since logical port configurations are client specific you could practically connect same ECC system (but 2 diff clients) to 2 gateway systems.
    Thanks,
    Girimurugan

  • Connecting two BW systems to the one R/3 source system

    Hi all!
    I have to connect two BW Systems to one R3 system. In our last tests we have had problems trying to connect two BW  servers simultaneously with R/3 source system because it allows only a logical system name for each R/3 client, and (We guess that we need to define tow diferent logical system name, one for each connection). This has been generating errors when we try to load data from R/3 to BW because, we guess, R/3 does not recognize the BW source system in the ALE connection for someone BW systems at transfer data. In this moment I have one connection active (BW1-R3). The BW2-R3 connection is already inactive. Does anybody know how perform this? we need solve the transfers problem as soon as possible.
    Thanks!  Judi

    Ah...
    please don't post twice the same question...in these forums we are always the same !!!
    You can close this thread to avoid to look in two different posts...
    Bye,
    Roberto

  • One iPlanet using two application servers?

    Can anyone help, is it possible for one iplanet 6.0 instance using/connecting two application servers (i.e. one is JRun server, another is Webspere server) at the same time?
    If so, how to do it?

    I don't see why not. I have had the same webserver talking to both iplanet 6.5 and sunOne 7. As both the application servers will connect vias a plugin I would suggest you follow the instructions for both application servers and see what happens.

  • One Internet Connection, Two different LANS & Two DHCP Servers, How to share internet without conflict?

    I have two LANs and one internet connection.  Each LAN has its own DHCP server.  I want to be able to have internet access on BOTH LANs but don't
    want to have a DHCP conflict between them.
    The main LAN is a Time Warner Cable modem and a Cisco router running DHCP going to a 48 port switch that has all the workstations connected.  
    The second is a stand alone Windows 2012 WDS server which is ONLY use to image computers via WDS. The server is running DHCP as well and is connected to another 48 port switch where I connect systems that need to be imaged.
     I want to be able to provide internet access on LAN with the Windows 2012 WDS server so after I image the computers I can download drivers direct from the internet.   The Windows WDS server has two NIC cards but I am only using one.   Is
    it possible to configure this so the internet from the main LAN is shared to the WDS server and its clients without causing problems with the two DHCP servers?   Here is a basic network diagram.   Thanks!

    Hi Adam,
    To share the internet on secondary VLAN, please follow the steps below:
    Connect the secondary switch to Cisco router
    Configure the devices on secondary VLAN to use Cisco router as its' gateway
    Configure NAT for secondary VLAN on Cisco router
    Due to different manufacturer has different ways to configure, for detailed configuration information, please consult the manufacturer of the switch and router.
    Best Regards.
    Steven Lee Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Policy based NAT to share 1 public between to two internal servers

    Hello all,
    I would like to implement a solution that allows me to share a single public IP amongst two internal servers. One service uses a range of tcp ports.
    I believe the below will address what I need however - can I use the ‘object-group’ command or do I need to specify each tcp port separately?
    This?
    object-group service A_Bunch_O_Ports tcp
    description Telemesis comms to-From Internet
    port-object eq https
    port-object eq www
    port-object eq 8060
    port-object eq 8070
    access-list policyNAT-share extended permit tcp host 172.20.40.100 object-group A_Bunch_O_Ports host 1.2.3.4 object-group A_Bunch_O_Ports
    access-list policyNAT-share extended permit tcp host 172.20.40.200 eq 25 host 1.2.3.4 eq 25
    nat (inside) 3 access-list policyNAT-share
    global (outside) 3 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255
    Or this?
    access-list policyNAT-share extended permit tcp host 172.20.40.100 eq 443 host 1.2.3.4 eq 443
    access-list policyNAT-share extended permit tcp host 172.20.40.100 eq 80 host 1.2.3.4 eq 80
    access-list policyNAT-share extended permit tcp host 172.20.40.100 eq 8060 host 1.2.3.4 eq 8060
    access-list policyNAT-share extended permit tcp host 172.20.40.100 eq 8070 host 1.2.3.4 eq 8070
    access-list policyNAT-share extended permit tcp host 172.20.40.200 eq 25 host 1.2.3.4 eq 25
    nat (inside) 3 access-list policyNAT-share
    global (outside) 3 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255

    Do you need both inbound and outbound connection for the server, or only outbound connection?
    If you only need outbound connection, then you don't even need to specify the port on the access-list. You can just configure the following:
    nat (inside) 3 172.20.40.100 255.255.255.255
    nat (inside) 3 172.20.40.200 255.255.255.255
    global (outside) 3 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255
    However if you need both inbound and outbound connection for the server, then you should configure the following:
    static (inside,outside) tcp 1.2.3.4 443 172.20.40.100 443 netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp 1.2.3.4 80 172.20.40.100 80 netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp 1.2.3.4 8060 172.20.40.100 8060 netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp 1.2.3.4 8070 172.20.40.100 8070 netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp 1.2.3.4 25 172.20.40.200 25 netmask 255.255.255.255

  • How to configure time synchronization for two NTP servers

    We have IOSXR 4.2.1 on routers CRS3 and ASR9K with all recomended SMUs; we need to configure the time synchronization for two NTP servers with the configuration below, but the routers became unstable; synchronize with one NTP servers for some time, then switch to other NTP server, and keep doing this. Anyone know why this behavior?
    ntp
    authentication-key 1 md5 encrypted 01070F074F0A05
    authenticate
    trusted-key 1
    server 10.192.32.32 prefer
    server 10.192.32.33
    source Loopback50
    update-calendar
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:DFCRSDTC1#sh log | i ntp
    Wed Jul 10 09:37:04.621 BRSPO
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:29:18 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-SYNC_LOSS : Synchronization lost : 10.192.32.32 : Peer unreachable or clock selection failed
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:29:18 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_LOST : High priority NTP peer connection lost - Stratum 2->15.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:29:18 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-ALL_CONN_LOST : All NTP peer connections failed.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:29:27 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_RECOVERED : High priority NTP peer connection recovered - Stratum 15->2.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:30:21 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-SYNC_LOSS : Synchronization lost : 10.192.32.32 : Peer unreachable or clock selection failed
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:30:21 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_LOST : High priority NTP peer connection lost - Stratum 2->15.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:30:21 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-ALL_CONN_LOST : All NTP peer connections failed.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:31:36 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_RECOVERED : High priority NTP peer connection recovered - Stratum 15->2.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:35:56 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-SYNC_LOSS : Synchronization lost : 10.192.32.33 : Peer unreachable or clock selection failed
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:35:56 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_LOST : High priority NTP peer connection lost - Stratum 2->15.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:35:56 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-ALL_CONN_LOST : All NTP peer connections failed.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:40:11 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_RECOVERED : High priority NTP peer connection recovered - Stratum 15->2.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:50:52 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-SYNC_LOSS : Synchronization lost : 10.192.32.33 : System clock selection failed
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:50:52 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_LOST : High priority NTP peer connection lost - Stratum 2->6.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 21:59:26 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_RECOVERED : High priority NTP peer connection recovered - Stratum 6->2.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 22:25:07 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-SYNC_LOSS : Synchronization lost : 10.192.32.33 : System clock selection failed
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 22:25:07 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-HP_CONN_LOST : High priority NTP peer connection lost - Stratum 2->6.
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 22:56:16 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-SYNC_LOSS : Synchronization lost : 10.192.32.33 : Peer unreachable or clock selection failed
    RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Jul  4 22:56:16 : ntpd[256]: %IP-IP_NTP-5-ALL_CONN_LOST : All NTP peer connections failed.

    Hi Claudio, that ddts is pretty generic to be honest but yes it is filed to address sync issues in the XR NTP algo.
    The thing is that XR ntp clock selection is a bit different then iOS and follows the specs very closely which results in this erroneous loss behavior.
    For instance, you could also see this issue with a sync loss if the update time is only 500msec off what it was before and that will result in a ntp sync loss rather then adjusting to it.
    Also I wanted to mention that the ntp prefer is a bit of a misnomer in XR (since it follows the specs differently then IOS) and this knob was taken over from IOS really.
    You might get some joy if you set it to one server only and see if that helps?
    regards
    xander

  • How to set two radius servers one is window NPS another is cisco radius server

    how to set two radius servers one is window NPS another is cisco radius server
    when i try the following command, once window priority is first , i type cisco radius user name, it authenticated fail
    i can not use both at the same time
    radius-server host 192.168.1.3  is window NPS
    radius-server host 192.168.1.1 is cisco radius
    http://blog.skufel.net/2012/06/how-to-integrating-cisco-devices-access-with-microsoft-npsradius/
    conf t
    no aaa authentication login default line
    no aaa authentication login local group radius
    no aaa authorization exec default group radius if-authenticated
    no aaa authorization network default group radius
    no aaa accounting connection default start-stop group radius
    aaa new-model
    aaa group server radius IAS
     server 192.168.1.1 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
     server 192.168.1.3 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    aaa authentication login userAuthentication local group IAS
    aaa authorization exec userAuthorization local group IAS if-authenticated
    aaa authorization network userAuthorization local group IAS
    aaa accounting exec default start-stop group IAS
    aaa accounting system default start-stop group IAS
    aaa session-id common
    radius-server host 192.168.1.1 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    radius-server host 192.168.1.2 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    radius-server host 192.168.1.3 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646
    radius-server host 192.168.1.3 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    privilege exec level 1 show config
    ip radius source-interface Gi0/1
    line vty 0 4
     authorization exec userAuthorization
     login authentication userAuthentication
     transport input telnet
    line vty 5 15
     authorization exec userAuthorization
     login authentication userAuthentication
     transport input telnet
    end
    conf t
    aaa group server radius IAS
     server 192.168.1.3 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
     server 192.168.1.1 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    end

    The first AAA server listed in your config will always be used unless/until it becomes unavailable. At that point the NAD would move down to the next AAA server defined on the list and use that one until it becomes unavailable and then move to third one, and so on. 
    If you want to use two AAA servers at the same time then you will need to put a load balancer in front of them. Then the virtual IP (vip) will be listed in the NADs vs the individual AAA servers' IPs. 
    I hope this helps!
    Thank you for rating helpful posts!

  • Two licence servers in one environment

    Hi,
    Is it possible to install two licence servers in one environment and point some of the users to one licence server and others to another. Is there where i can change on the local PC to point to a licence server.
    My assumption is that it is stored centrally as i tried to change it on one user PC and all were changed to the same server. Is my assumption correct or how can this be achieved.
    Thank you in advance and your help is appreciated.
    Regard,
    Fanna

    Hi,
    The SAP Business One workstations read the name of the license service to which they connect from the SLIC table in the SBO-Common database. All Company databases sharing an SBO-Common database use the same license file. In addition, several SBO-Common databases can direct to the same license service.
    For more information please refer to:
    [License Guide 2007A|https://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700000359212007E.pdf]
    hope it helps,
    Regards,
    Ladislav
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Connect two BI in one BO server

    Hi people,
    It´s possible to connect two SAP BI Servers (development and production) in one BO Enterprise X.I 3.1?
    More thanks

    Hello,
    yes it is. You can enter multiple Entitlement Systems in the SAP Are aof the Authentication within the CMC.
    Regards
    -Seb.

  • Weblogic managed servers connecting to the servers in different cluster

              Hi All,
              We have a weired problem going on for a while. We have a cluster configuration
              with an admin server and two managed servers. We have the similar configuration
              in DEV, TEST and PROD. The problem is that the managed server members in DEV cluster
              are making connections to managed servers which are member of PROD cluster for
              session replication. The same way TEST servers are trying to connect to PROD and
              DEV.
              Has anyone seen this kind of problem before. BEA seems to be cluless so far.
              Thanks in adavnce for your input.
              Udit
              

              Venkat,
              Thats a good suggestion but these things are too obvious to ignore. We have different
              multicast address in DEV and PROD and also hosts are on different sub net. I do
              not know if cluster name will make any differene though.
              Thanks for your input anyway,
              Udit
              "venkat" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >
              >Udit,
              > You can check the sub net, multicast address and the cluster name.
              >If the dev
              >and prod servers are in the same sub net with same multicast address,
              >then change
              >the multicast and try.
              >
              >Venkat
              >"venkat" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >>
              >>Udit,
              >>
              >>
              >>"Udit Singh" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >>>
              >>>Kumar,
              >>>Thanks for the reply.
              >>>The situation is that managed server in DEV try to replicate the session
              >>>to a
              >>>managed server in PROD and TEST and vice versa.
              >>>Let us say our dev managed servers are running on abc01 and abc02 and
              >>>prod managed
              >>>servers are running on xyz01 and xyz02. All the managed servers are
              >>running
              >>>on
              >>>port 7005.
              >>>If I do the netstat on abc01 or abc02 I could the see established connections
              >>>between abc01/02 and xyz01/02.
              >>>Why is that happening? We are running 6.1SP2.
              >>>
              >>>Udit
              >>>
              >>>Kumar Allamraju <[email protected]> wrote:
              >>>>We do not restrict intercluster communication as of 61 SP3.
              >>>>Once we get the IP from the cookie, we can safely make a
              >>>>connection to the other clustered node. We were not checking
              >>>>if the server is part of the same cluster or not. This is
              >>>>already fixed in 7.x and 61 SP4(not yet released) If you are
              >>>>on 61 Sp2 or SP3 then you should contact support and
              >>>>reference CR # CR089798 to get a one off patch.
              >>>>
              >>>>Regardless, are you traversing from DEV to PROD cluster and
              >>>>vice-versa. If not then this problem shouldn't happen unless
              >>>>plugin is routing the request to wrong cluster.
              >>>>
              >>>>--
              >>>>Kumar
              >>>>
              >>>>Udit Singh wrote:
              >>>>> Hi All,
              >>>>> We have a weired problem going on for a while. We have a cluster
              >>configuration
              >>>>> with an admin server and two managed servers. We have the similar
              >>>configuration
              >>>>> in DEV, TEST and PROD. The problem is that the managed server members
              >>>>in DEV cluster
              >>>>> are making connections to managed servers which are member of PROD
              >>>>cluster for
              >>>>> session replication. The same way TEST servers are trying to connect
              >>>>to PROD and
              >>>>> DEV.
              >>>>> Has anyone seen this kind of problem before. BEA seems to be cluless
              >>>>so far.
              >>>>>
              >>>>> Thanks in adavnce for your input.
              >>>>> Udit
              >>>>
              >>>
              >>
              >
              

  • Transferring data between two production servers

    HI All,
    I have read weblogs in transferring scenarios from Dev to Qual to Prod.
    But I have a different requirement in which I have to transfer data from one production server to another production server without distrubing the first production server.
    Say A and B are two production servers, I wanted to transfer data from A to B on daily basis.
    Please give me some ideas on this....
    Thanks
    Veni

    Hello,
    I would suggest to use IDOC for transferring data (master \ transaction ) ... to do that you need to setup logical system (prod b) and RFC connection to connect to system prod b ...
    Also distributional model need to setup for pushing the outbound idoc into RFC connection through receiver port.
    Thanks
    Krish

Maybe you are looking for