Connecting two routers wired - the definitive answer

This is a common issue and I answered the question probably more than a hundred times thus I put it into a new thread to which I can simply link from now on... Please do not post a reply in this thread if you have a problem setting it up. Post a NEW thread instead. This thread would explode if everybody would post in here...
You have one router running in your network. This router connects to the internet. Now you want to hook up a second router (e.g. a wireless router to have wireless access) in your network connecting both with an ethernet cable. The following is in most cases the best approach for home networks. You'll find similar answers with some screenshots in the Linksys Easy Answers, e.g. 4579
The setup:
1. Unplug the second router from anything. Connect a single computer to the router. Do not connect the second router to the first at the moment!
2. Configure the router at http://192.168.1.1/
3. Change the LAN IP address of the second router from 192.168.1.1 to a free address in your LAN (e.g. 192.168.1.2 should be O.K. if the first router is also a Linksys router). The address you change to (192.168.1.2) must not be used by any other device with static IP address in your network nor should be assigned by the DHCP server your network. A default Linksys router uses 192.168.1.1 itself and the DHCP server assigns 192.168.1.100-149.
4. Turn off the DHCP server on the second router.
5. Save the setting.
6. Unplug the computer from the second router.
7. Connect an ethernet cable from a numbered LAN port of the first router to a numbered LAN port of the second router. Do not use the Internet/WAN port on the second router!
8. That's it! If you don't know or don't want to know more about networking you don't have to read the rest here.
What do you have now?
The second router is connected through a LAN port to your existing network. This basically means that the router part of the device is actually not used. So you have a router device that you don't operate as router in your network. Whatever you connect to the second router either through one of the remaining LAN ports or through a wireless if it has one, is directly connected to your LAN. Devices connected to the second router use the DHCP server of the first router to get an IP address. They use the first router directly for internet access. Everything is connected to a single larger ethernet network. Everything is in a single "broadcast" domain.
If the second router is not a wireless one, you basically have a few more ports in your network. In that case it might have been cheaper to get a simple switch/hub instead to extend your network.
Please remember: as the second router is not connected through the Internet/WAN port many configurations and functions of the second router won't work simply because they require an internet connection on the router itself. Some examples are: access restrictions, dynamic DNS service, port forwardings, MAC address clone, the firewall... All these things must be configured on the first router and only there.
Why is this better than connecting the second router with the Internet port?
A router is a separating network element. It separates two networks and allows certain traffic to cross. Sometimes this is necessary in a network setup but for most home networks it only creates a lot of obstacles.
1. In default Gateway mode the second router does network address translation (NAT). This means computers connected to the second router can connect to computers connected to the first router but not in the opposite direction.
2. If you use Router mode on the second router: you have to configure "routes" on the first router and possibly your computer connected to the first router so that IP packets find their way into the subnet of the second router.
3. You have two separate ethernet networks and thus two "broadcast" domains. A broadcast in the first router's subnet reaches all computers connected there. The same applies to the second router. A broadcast will never cross the second router, though. This is an obstacle for applications that depend on broadcasting to locate other computers and services. Windows file and printer sharing is one example here. With the second router in between, computers on one side do not know about computers on the other side. You cannot search your workgroup for the computer on the other side even when they use the identical workgroup name. You will be able to access the other computer using the IP address directly (e.g. \\192.168.1.100\share) but that's usually a hassle and the IP address may change if it is assigned by the DHCP server to the computer. There are ways to deal with some of these issues (e.g. save the host names in lmhosts files...) but all this requires more effort and attention to keep everything up-to-date.
4. Port forwardings become more complicated. If you need a port forwarding (i.e. you want a port on a computer in your network to be accessible from the internet) on a computer connected to the second router you have to setup two forwardings: one on the first router to the second router and one on the second router to the computer.
5. If you have two wireless routers: you cannot roam between both routers without loosing the connection. This is simply because if a wireless computers moves from one router to the other it needs a different IP address.
6. The whole configuration becomes more complicated: you always have to think about where to configure what, e.g. dynamic DNS service, access restrictions, ...
Bottom line: unless you have good reasons why you must have some computers separated from the other computers in your network, there is no good reason to in a home network to do so. For normal home networking with simple to use file and printer sharing it is better to connect the second router as suggested in this post...
Message Edited by gv on 08-11-2007 01:45 PM

I have tried all the advice I can find and to no avail.  I even got my Network Certified Tech son to advise me.
I have a WRT54GS Wireless router that was my main and only device acting as a gateway hosting my cable modem access to charter.net.  It is located on the second floor of my house next to my main hardwired PC and print server attached HP Laserjet printer.  I am kicking Charter out and have had Verizon FIOS fiber optic service installed.
Verizon supplies an customized ActionTec wireless gateway/router with the install and it is installed in the basement on the same panel as my big circuit breaker panel.  They imply that it must the first router connected to their ONT (Optical Network Terminal)... sort of an optical modem.   I want the devices connected to my Linksys router in the 2nd floor bedroom to be on the same network as the wireless router in the basement. 
Based on this forum's and son's advice I did the following to my WRT54GS:
1. Changed the its address to 192.168.1.254 subnet 255.255.255.0
2. Turned off the DHCP server function.
3. Set operation from GATEWAY to ROUTER
4. Turn on Dynamic routing for LAN/WIRELESS
5. Plugged a standard cat5e cable from PORT 1 of the Verizon Router to PORT4  of the 2nd floor WRT54GS.
Result:  absolutely no connectivity between the Verizon gateway and the 2nd floor and vis-versa.  My 2nd floor PC could talk to the printer on the WRT54GS.  The Verizon router could connect with a temporally hard cabled laptop and with two wireless laptops.  I then tried the other variation of:
1. Changed the Ethernet cable from the Verizon Gateway from PORT 4 to the WAN port of the WRT54GS.
Result:  Same.. no connectivity between the Verizon gateway and the WRT54GS.
I was trying to get the WRT54GS to act as a simple hub and a wireless access point on the network.  I finally gave up and bought a simple $19 hub and everything worked immediately.
I still want to put the WRT54GS back in service but I can not make it work.  Whats going on here??
Brian Sanborn
Groton MA

Similar Messages

  • Connecting two WRT54GS to the same (wired) router (non-linksys)

    Due to some security issue I have to connect two WRT54GS to the same wired router.
    Do I connect the first WRT54GS to one port of the router and the second one to another port?
    And is the connection on the WRT the ethernetport or the internetport?
    And can I reach both the configuration screens or do I have to change the
    adress of one of them to e.g. 192.168.1.2 ?
    Regards,
    hENK.  

    I will suggest you to connect the LAN port of wired router to LAN ports of both WRT54GS  ........  Th connectino to WRT54GS is Ethernet Port ......
    Regarding the Ip address of WRT54GS ..... change the Ip address of first wireless router from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.2 ........make the DHCP service disabled ....
    For the other router the Ip address would be 192.168.1.3 ...... DHCP service again disabled .........
    For accessing the set up page of both router use the new Local Ip address.........on the explorer address bar ......

  • Ways to connect two routers

    Hello,
    We have two routers connected as shown in the diagram:
    We would like to create a one-hop connection ("peering") between the two routers (over the link shown) for routing purposes (iBGP, OSPF, static routes).
    What are the suggested way(s) to do it?
    Method 1: We have tried creating two GRE tunnels (one for IPv4 and one for IPv6) and it works but we are having various issues (which we are still troubleshooting)
    Method 2: We could create IPSec tunnels; I have not tried it.
    Method 3: This is my main question here. Can we define a common VLAN on the two routers so that, by using trunk links in-between, the two interfaces (actually a new subinterface of each: R1,G0/0.x - R2,G0/1.x) can coexist "alone" on one VLAN?
    Other suggested methods please?
    Thanks in advance for your assistance.
    Regards,
    Nick

    Thanks for the reply.
    Here is the current setup:
    {View image and zoom in to full scale for clearer reading!}
    With this configuration, the tunnels seem to be working correctly, however we are still having a problem: When I switch traffic so that it uses the tunnels, netflow export from R1 to a netflow server (using nfdump/nfsen) which is located at a LAN connected to R2, is not recorded correctly; I see (on R1):
    # sh ip flow export
    Flow export v9 is enabled for main cache
    Export source and destination details :
    VRF ID : Default
    Source(1) 195.251.xxx.yyy (Loopback0)
    Destination(1) 195.251.xxx.xxx (9995)
    Version 9 flow records
    680074 flows exported in 8490 udp datagrams
    0 flows failed due to lack of export packet
    1579 export packets were sent up to process level
    0 export packets were dropped due to no fib
    0 export packets were dropped due to adjacency issues
    0 export packets were dropped due to fragmentation failures
    0 export packets were dropped due to encapsulation fixup failures
    and I find that our traffic is not recorded correctly. (When we don't use these tunnels -but another route not shown in the diagram, which does not involve tunnels- then "export packets sent up to process level" are 0 and netflow export works correctly.)
    Netflow monitoring is critical to our network, so we have to troubleshoot this, before we can use this configuration in production. (I am thinking of opening a new thread for this problem.)
    Any and all suggestions will be welcome.
    Nick

  • How doi unistall itunes from an iphone? By accident we connected two phones to the same itunes account. So now whenever one downloads something, both phones receive the download.

    How do I uninstall an itunes account from an iphone? By accident we connected two phones to the same itunes account and now whenever we download both  phones receive the download.

    Settings > iTunes & App Store > Automatic Downloads > switch off what you don't want here

  • How can I connect two PS3 to the same Linksys WRT54G correctly

    Hi,
    i'm trying to connect two PS3 to the same routeur without having conflicts. Everytime i try to update my game softwares it tells me error 80710723 or now 8002AD23. I gave the two PS3 different IP adresses, i opened all the ports that Playstation suggested me to open (http://playstation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/241) and gave them different DNS adresses but still they cannot download any software content without bugging the console. I also use a PC, Tablet and Phone with my wireless connection.
    thank you
    -François

    Well in this case the error code (80710723 ) is generated when the internet connection is slow. So you can try the following step:
    # Open up the browser and on the address bar type 192.168.1.1 that will open up the Router setup page.
    # Lower the MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) from 1500 to 1400 or less (usually found on your router's main/ basic setup page)
    # Make the Channel Width to 20 MHz only and Channel to 6, 9, 11..
    #Adjust the following advanced wireless settings:
    ~~ Lower the beacon interval from 100 to 75
    ~~ Lower the fragmentation threshold from 2346 to 2306
    ~~ Lower the RTS threshold from 2347 to 2304

  • Cannot connect two computers to the same game server HELP!

    I have a Linksys WRT54G Router.  I have two computers and I want to be able to use them on the same gaming server.  Unfortunately, the game only have one port, so I can only port forward one of my computers.  How can I configure my router to have two external IP addresses to the server so it won't kick one of my computers out.  Thanks!

    Hi,
    I am in a gaming community and many members have a Linksys at home (but I don't know which kind exactly). Many of us try to connect two computers to the same server (many have a family). It seems it is a common problem that no one can connect two computers to the same game server.
    I have a BEFSR41 V3 Firmware version 1.04.8
    I use fixed IP address and no connectivity problem on Internet.
    I have win XP SP2 on both computer.
    I am using a DSL modem
    I can connect the two computers to two different game servers at same time, but not the same server. Default port for this game is the same for all servers I use. I tried with both port forwarding enabled (in that case one PCs can connect the other not) or not (in the second case, whenever the second PC connects, the first one lose his connection to the server, no mater the order I try to connect my PCs).
    Now the weird thing is that one member in my community just decided to throw away his Linksys router and he bought another brand (which I won't name to remains politically correct). Now, without changing anything in his PCs or his connection type, he can now play with two PC on the same server.
    I am seriously thinking doing the same move. Since more and more game are now using Internet (and servers that controls piracy, $$) and family want to play together, not being able to connect two PCs on the same game server makes Linksys in bad situation from marketing point of view.
    For example, in my gaming communtity, we now all know that Linksys can't handle two PC on same server, but other brand can...
    Thank you in advance for your help.

  • How do I correct the problem of two routers with the same OSPF Router IDs?

    How do I correct the problem of two routers with the same OSPF Router IDs?

    Hi,
    The answer above is correct, though you don't really need to reload, you can just simply clear the OSPF process with the following command:
    clear ip ospf 1 process
    HTH

  • What's the definitive answer ?

    I have a question which I'm sure has been asked but I cant seem to find it. I have 12" PB G4, 1.5GHz. I have order iLife 08 but in reading the discussion boards I'm not sure it will work. Some say it will ,other say there is a work around for imovie. others say return
    So, here's the questions:
    Will imovie be the only issue?
    If so, Can I still use imovie 06?
    Should I just return it ?
    What's the definitive answer ?
    Thanks

    Sounds like you've seen a few posts on this, but I'll confirm what I know, which does not include a work around for iMovie'08:
    I installed iLife'08 and iWork'08 on three machines last night.
    iMovie'08 would not even try to install on our G-4, 1.25gHz, the line item and check box were always grayed out. iLife'08 did not bother my existing iMovie'04, or '05, and installed the other components fine.
    The G-5 and Intel machines both loaded everything fine.
    Joe

  • Connecting two routers to one internet connection, one with dynamic and the other static?

    My father uses a BEFW11S4 router with firewall  for his home office. It uses a Dynamic IP. I have my computer up stairs and the internet conenction is set up through the router via wired connection. The problem that I have is that in order for several of my online games to work, (Final Fantasy XI and the Playstation 3 network) I need to add Port codes to the router to gain access to the online features in the games. To add the port codes to the router, I need to change to a Static IP.
    My father does not want to change to a Static IP and so I am unable to connect to the online services that the games provide.
    Is it possible to connect another Router to the same internet connection? This one would be a static IP.

    Ok well My father's computer is wired and so is mine. My ps3 is wireless. My father needs the dynamic IP on his computer or he will not be able to use the things needed for his work. I need the router to be Static so that I can play the games. So What you are saying is that I can still use 1 router and have both dynamic and Static IP set up at the same time of the one internet connection?

  • Using two routers for the same SSID

    So here's my story. I have a standard Actiontec router in my basment, connected straight to the coax outlet, and connected by LAN Ethernet to a crappy computer nobody uses. It gives off a WPA2 wifi network, let's call it MyNetwork. For the longest time it's been the only router in the house. The coax outlet is on a splitter, splitting the coax outlet into one wire that goes to the Actiontec modem/router and the other to my TV STB. Recently we installed a new coax outlet on the other side of my house and next to it we have a brand new desktop computer that we use often. It has no wifi so and we can't run an ethernet cable throughout the entire house so we got a new Actiontec modem/router from our neighbor who just moved out. It's the exact same Actiontec device.
    What we want to do is make it so that both routers give off signal on the same MyNetwork we have to make it a wider reaching signal, and so that I can connect the new desktop computer to the new router with an ethernet cable. I've read so many guides and they're all so confusing and it's such a mess that I almost completely screwed over my network. it seems like the two routers are completely independent of one another, not even aware of the others' existence. The new router is definitely in range of the old one. I've logged into 192.168.1.1 on the new computer and the new router seems to think it IS the old router (or so I think). It showed me all the same devices that have connected to MyNetwork and such, but then again it's always hard to be certain exactly which device is which. After messing around I must have changed some IP address or something, but it seems that 192.168.1.1 doesn't take me to the Verizon login screen, but 192.168.2.1 does. Can I reset those IP addresses?
    And of course, can somone please provide a clean, easy to follow course of action as to how to set up two routers on one network?

    maxbirch wrote:
    ... I have a standard Actiontec router in my basement ... connected by LAN Ethernet to a computer ... It gives off a WPA2 wifi network, let's call it MyNetwork ... The coax outlet is on a splitter ... one wire that goes to the Actiontec ... other to my TV STB ...
    ... installed a new coax outlet on the other side of my house ...
    ... What we want to do is make it so that both routers give off signal on the same MyNetwork we have to make it a wider reaching signal, and so that I can connect the new desktop computer to the new router with an ethernet cable ...
    ... can somone please provide a clean, easy to follow course of action ... ?
    I suspect it might be a good idea to step back reconsider your ultimate layout.  Essentially you now have two (or if the STB is also included, three) coax drops connected to the ONT.  It seems that you desire that one of these service the STB, and the other two each service a desktop and a wireless access point.  If this is the case, continue reading.
    There is no need to consider the original Actiontec router as the primary router, wireless or otherwise.  Use the new coax location to connect to the primary Actiontec router (you can use either router).  For starters, reset both routers to their factory defaults using the reset switch on the back of each device (for details, do a search).
    Once the primary router has been located (or relocated) to the new coax drop, just connect the new desktop there using an Ethernet cable connected to one of the LAN ports on the back of the router.  Then set up your primary wireless network based on this router (once again, do a search on these forums for specifics on setting up a basic wireless home network).
    Now use the original coax outlet where the first router was located to set up another access point.  This access point will provide Ethernet connections plus an additional wireless network (if it's still needed).  However you cannot have two wireless devices on a single home network with the same SSID (i.e., network name).  Here are details on some methods to do this:
    http://www.dslreports.com/faq/12506
    For additional details, here's the complete FAQ:
    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CCwQFjAA&url...
    Take a careful look at these suggestions and references to decide if this is what you want.  Then report back if there are remaining questions.  Good luck.

  • How to : connect two routers running under another

    So this issue is tricky and i have had no luck in getting this to work. Basically what i need to do, is connect "Network 2" with "Network 1" and both run off of another larger network. The Base Network is out of my control and i cannot set or change any setting within that network's routers or DHCP Servers. Thus i am forced to set routes within my routers to communicate to each other. The need for this communication is software that runs on a server within "Network 1" needs to be available to all client computers running on both "Network 1" and 'Network 2". Obviously the computers running off the same router as the server are fine. Getting the computers running off the router for "Network 2" is the tricky part. Here is a link to a diagram of the setup : http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h176/m4x70r/networkquery.jpg Some of the things i have tried are setting the DMZ on "Network 1" to point at the server. Setting routes in both to point at the other. Setting the Gateway in "Network 2" router to point at the WAN address of "Network 1" and setting the DNS of "Network 2" to the WAN of "Network 1". No matter what i do, the laptops inside "Network 2" cannot ping the laptops in "Network 1" or even ping the router for "Network 1". However, when pinging the name of the server, it does show the IP addy i gave it, so it sees it in some small fashion but cannot link to it. I'm stumped. Time to get a networking cert i suppose. Any help or suggestions would be much appreciated!

    First you have missed to mentioned the most important thing for your setup: are those two routers running in gateway mode or router mode?
    It is also quite confusing which routes you tried to set exactly. (in particular why you mentioned the DNS server?). Please simply post the exact settings of the routes you have entered on either routers.
    As you have mentioned that you have no control over the main network I guess your routers operate in gateway mode. In that case they do NAT - network address translation. NAT shares a single public IP address with multiple computers with private IP addresses inside the LAN. NAT makes computers in the LAN inaccessible from the outside unless you have configured an explicit port forwarding or DMZ host.
    Moreover, with NAT you cannot access the computers inside the LAN on an inside IP address. This is impossible because the private IP addresses inside the LAN are not visible on the outside. You can only access any computer on the WAN IP address of the router. You cannot ping any computer inside the LAN behind the router with NAT. UDP or TCP access is limited to what you forward. The DMZ host is the "default" forward which gets all ports which are not forwarded otherwise.
    If both routers are in gateway mode you don't have to define any routes on the routers as the destination subnet is not accessible. To make your server accessible you have to define port forwardings to your server on 192.168.1.2 or put it into the DMZ. You can then access the server the external IP address of the router, i.e. 10.7.2.101. The router forwards incoming traffic on that address to your server at 192.168.1.2.

  • Connect two routers-wireless

    Hello, I am looking around the forums and can't find and i'd like to know next:
    I have two routers Linksys (wrv200 and wrt110). One on one side of the house, the other will be at the other side od the house. Questions:
    - Is it possible to wirelessly connect second to frist 
    - Second willl broadcast the same SSID (wireless and other settings) as the first and will have the function of covering the signal on the other side of the house and outside, where the first virtually could not 
    - Which one of these two routerja recommend as the first (connect to a modem)
    - What is all need to set athe first and second routerj
    Thanks for help.

    You cannot connect two Linksys Routers Wirelessly, you have to have them connected with cables...see this

  • Connect two routers wirelessely

    I have two routers SRX 200  and WRT300N and want to connect them wirelessly. First of all would it be possible to do that and 2nd will it increase the coverage? I will appreciate for your response.

    Both your routers have better signal/speed capabilities compared to the normal G routers. However, you can't connect them wirelessly.

  • How can I connect two ipods on the same computer ?

    Hello,
    My girlfriend has just bought a ipod nano. I have already a "classic" ipod. Do you know how can I connect the two Ipod on the sasme computer without loosing all my songs ? Is ti possible to select songs that she will transfer ?
    Thanks for your answer

    I am trying to contact a Nano to the same computer that has a Shuffle and Mini on it but it just doesn't want to update. I have been sitting fr about 3 hours now trying to make it work and cannot get anywhere. Can ANYONE help?
    Thanks.
    Do Apple not have an online help service? It seems a little strange for a company so large.

  • Bluetooth - Connecting two devices at the same time on a Run (Bluetooth Mot headset

    I would like to connect two Bluetooth devised at the same time on my runs.  (Bluetooth Motorola headset (S10-HD) and Polars heart monitor (H7) at the same time)  is that possible? 

    fitnessdr wrote:
    Thank you for the information.  So if I were to return the new bluetooth keyboard, should I purchase the "Palm 3169WWZ Wireless Keyboard", or is there another model I should be looking for?  (From what I can tell, I believe this one will use IR.)
    THANKS!
    Correct, that's the one I use. 
    Be sure to download the newest driver (1.13) for the keyboard from the Palm Support pages for the keyboard:
    http://kb.palm.com/wps/portal/kb/na/keyboards/palmuniversalwirelesskeyboard/unlocked/downloads/page_...
    Do not install the driver that comes with the device on the disk - 1.13 is designed for the TX and fixes a bug that existed in the original driver.
    WyreNut
    I am a Volunteer here, not employed by HP.
    You too can become an HP Expert! Details HERE!
    If my post has helped you, click the Kudos Thumbs up!
    If it solved your issue, Click the "Accept as Solution" button so others can benefit from the question you asked!

Maybe you are looking for