Connection is being lost to the exchange?

What is the "Exchange"?

Some light reading. http://www.kitz.co.uk/adsl/telephone_exchange.htm
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Similar Messages

The Connection has been lost by the host--AIM, iChat

Hi. Every time I try to log on to AIM or iChat, it goes through the sequence of signing on, but then I get "The Connection has been lost by the host". Now, I would think it would be my connection, being on a college campus and all, but I have no issues surfing the web and checking my e-mail via entourage. My roommates and everyone on my floor have no issues, but then again, none of them are using a Mac.
It worked this whole week and then yesterday it decided to crap out on me. I've restarted, turned off the computer, went back to it...nothing.
I have MacBook using OS X, I have the latest version of AIM and iChat, and I'm using ethernet right now.
--I've tried changing the ports in both programs...no luck.
and my college network doesn't offer support for any IM program, no matter how hard you beg them.
Message was edited by: Sammi921
Message was edited by: Sammi921

Hi
Try logging on to AIM on port 443 rather than port 5190.
Go to IChat in the menu bar > Preferences > Accounts.
Log out of AIM and then use the Server Settings tab
Set the port to 443.
Log back in again.
Tony

Since installing iOS6 in my iPad2 the connection keep being bounced from the wireless all the time after a few seconds. What can I do ?

Since installing iOS6 on my recently purchased iPad2 the connection is being bounced off the wireless all the time after a fw seconds. What can I do?

Try #5.
Some things to try first:
1. Turn Off your iPad. Then turn Off (disconnect power cord for 30 seconds or longer) the wireless router & then back On. Now boot your iPad. Hopefully it will see the WiFi.
2. Go to Settings>Wi-Fi and turn Off. Then while at Settings>Wi-Fi, turn back On and chose a Network.
3. Change the channel on your wireless router (Auto or Channel 6 is best). Instructions at http://macintoshhowto.com/advanced/how-to-get-a-good-range-on-your-wireless-netw ork.html
4. Go into your router security settings and change from WEP to WPA with AES.
5. Renew IP Address: (especially if you are droping internet connection)
    •    Launch Settings app
    •    Tap on Wi-Fi
    •    Tap on the blue arrow of the Wi-Fi network that you connect to from the list
    •    In the window that opens, tap on the Renew Lease button
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
iOS 6 Wifi Problems/Fixes
Fix For iOS 6 WiFi Problems?
http://tabletcrunch.com/2012/09/27/fix-ios-6-wifi-problems/
Did iOS 6 Screw Your Wi-Fi? Here’s How to Fix It
http://gizmodo.com/5944761/does-ios-6-have-a-wi+fi-bug
How To Fix Wi-Fi Connectivity Issue After Upgrading To iOS 6
http://www.iphonehacks.com/2012/09/fix-wi-fi-connectivity-issue-after-upgrading- to-ios-6.html
iOS 6 iPad 3 wi-fi "connection fix" for netgear router
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsWS4ha-dn0
Apple's iOS 6 Wi-Fi problems
http://www.zdnet.com/apples-ios-6-wi-fi-problems-linger-on-7000004799/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How to Fix a Poor Wi-Fi Signal on Your iPad
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/a/How-To-Fix-A-Poor-Wi-Fi-Signal-O n-Your-iPad.htm
iOS Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398
iPad: Issues connecting to Wi-Fi networks http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3304
WiFi Connecting/Troubleshooting http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/wifi/
How to Fix: My iPad Won't Connect to WiFi
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/ss/How-To-Fix-My-Ipad-Wont-Connect -To-Wi-Fi.htm
iOS: Connecting to the Internet http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1695
iOS: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
How to Quickly Fix iPad 3 Wi-Fi Reception Problems
http://osxdaily.com/2012/03/21/fix-new-ipad-3-wi-fi-reception-problems/
iPad Wi-Fi Problems: Comprehensive List of Fixes
http://appletoolbox.com/2010/04/ipad-wi-fi-problems-comprehensive-list-of-fixes/
Fix iPad Wifi Connection and Signal Issues http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwWtIG5jUxE
Fix Slow WiFi Issue https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2398063?start=60&tstart=0
How To Fix iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch Wi-Fi Connectivity Issue http://tinyurl.com/7nvxbmz
Unable to Connect After iOS Update - saw this solution on another post.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4010130
Note - When troubleshooting wifi connection problems, don't hold your iPad by hand. There have been a few reports that holding the iPad by hand, seems to attenuate the wifi signal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If any of the above solutions work, please post back what solved your problem. It will help others with the same problem.
 Cheers, Tom

Hey..... i have a problem with my phone to use wifi ...first no WiFi appears to be in range and i just discovered that it only connects to wifi when im next to the router....the question is how can i get it to connect without being next to the router??

WHATS WRONG? OR HOW CAN I CONNECT MY PHONE TO WIFI WITHOUT IT BEING NEXT TO THE ROUTER ALL THE TIME?

Then it's likely that you have a hardware issue on your hands. Follow the three r's:
1. Restart: Turn it off and then on again
2. Reset: Hold down the home and power button until the apple logo appears
3. Restore: Connect the device to iTunes and restore it as new. Test the issue and see if it persists.
Don't forget to back up before you restore, so you can keep your data.
If the three r's don't work to solve your issue, you will need to get your phone repaired. To do this, you can go into the apple store or call 1-800-275-2273.

HP OfficeJet Pro 8500A Plus - Wifi connection keeps being lost??

Hi - please can someone help?
HP OfficeJet Pro 8500A Plus all-in-one printer - connected at home to laptop via cable (works fine) and PC (Windows Vista) via router and wifi.
Wifi is enabled and connected (light on printer on). Printer is set on PC as default. Printer has previously worked with these settings perfectly fine via the PC, but has lately developed intermittant dropping of the wifi connection.
Sometimes a PC reboot works, but this is tedious and should not be necessary - does anyone have any thoughts on why this keeps happening and some things I could try to reset - have done all what I thought were obvious steps, such as reseting the wifi network via the printer. Everything works for a short while and then just stops.???

Hi,
Please refer the link below to troubleshoot the issue.
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c02817031&tmp_task=solveCategory&cc=us&dlc=en&ju...
Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.
--Say "Thanks" by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
--Please mark the post that solves your problem as "Accepted Solution"

Hi. In simple language, can you please tell me the best way to protect my important and numerous files - music, images and docs - from being lost; in the event the computer crashes and data is irretrievable?

I have a lot of photos and music, plus important personal files. In simple terms, can you recommend how I should go about backing these up and ensuring they are not lost through some computer malfunction?
I need to understand the uses and merits of iCloud, Time Machine and on/off site external drives. I don't really want to invest money, time or new external hardware to achieve this. It can't be too labour intensive, either.
I have an external drive, which I last backed up perhaps two years ago. It is old, it requires wiring, and it sits next to to the desktop, so would be useless in case of fire (god forbid), say.
At the same time, I am concerned about cloud storage, and putting personal info and files into anonymous server farms, and the hands of anonymous organisations/people.
Call me a luddite, but I suspect these are fairly standard concerns, and I can find simple answers with a simple Google search.
Thanks in advance for your help.

This is what Apple has to say:
Report on Government Information Requests
"... our business does not depend on collecting personal data. We have no interest in amassing personal information about our customers."
This one concerns iOS, but its approach to privacy is the same:
http://images.apple.com/ipad/business/docs/iOS_Security_Feb14.pdf
A couple stories about one Google alternative:
DuckDuckGo: the plucky upstart taking on Google with secure searches
DuckDuckGo: The privacy search ruffling Google's feathers
NSA scandal delivers record numbers of internet users to DuckDuckGo
Why Traffic To These Google Alternatives Is Soaring
One of several concerns about Google Chrome, for instance:
Chrome Bugs Allow Sites to Listen to Your Private Conversations
Google's Business Model: YOU Are the Product
"You are not a Google customer. You are a Google product."
Those aren't just anyone's worthless opinions. Those are also the exact words of a federal magistrate dismissing a case regarding privacy intrusion involving the plaintiff's Android phone:
"... With little or no revenue from its users, Google still manages to turn a healthy profit by selling advertisements within its products that rely in substantial part on users’ personal identification information (“PII”). As some before have observed, in this model, the users are the real product."
I understand you didn't ask primarily about Google, but you expressed the very understandable desire for privacy, yet don't seem to mind using Google for search. Those aren't reconcilable sentiments.

BT reduction for being close to the exchange

Has anyone heard of a charge reduction that BT are giving to customers that live close to an exchange with LLU ?
djh22.

This must be a tactic used.
Apparently BT staff pay £1 for each service.
Anyway
We had a well dressed man come to our house and asked us if we were happy with our free line rental deal. I said we were paying for our line rental. I also asked which company he worked for. He insisted that he was from BT as he knew who we were (full names) and that we were not with another supplier. He produced a form that required my signiture to 'authorise' the free line rental. It was only when I said that I was going to phone BT to confirm this unwelcome visit that he confessed all and said he was from TalkTalk and that he still wanted us to sign the form!!!!
Sent him packing.
edit.
If there are many isp's at an exchange then you will get a better deal on your BB. This was confirmed by BT which IMHO is unfair as I don't have enough to qualify for the 'better' deals
Some can get opt3 for less than £16.00 pm
-+-No longer a forum member-+-

SQLException(original cause) in throw new EJBException(SQLException) is being lost, when the remote exception is being thrown by the container (ejbStore()) in IPlanet. Works in WL and WS

(IPlanet 6 - SP4)
we have something like this in the EntityBean :
ejbstore()
try {
myDAO.Update();
catch(SQLException se)
throw new EJBException(se);
But in the SessionBean, where we set the detail (which
causes ejbStore() to fire), I'm seeing a TransactionRolledBack exception with no trace of the
original exception within it (The "detail" attribute
too is null ). The same thing works in WL and WS.
Any suggestions appreciated.

Turn your checked exceptions into unchecked exceptions and retrieve the cause later:
RuntimeException unchecked = new RuntimeException(checked);
Throwable t = unchecked.getCause();Stephen

I am unable to get past the first step of Winston Churchill's answer because my phone says "checking for a software update failed because you are not connected to the Internet". Did my WiFi connection also get lost?

I am unable to get past the first step of Winston Churchill's answer because my phone says "checking for a software update failed because you are not connected to the Internet." Did my iphone's WiFi connection also get lost with the Contacts, Mail and Text Messages? When I tried the software update, as recommended by Winston Churchill, the iphone was connected to my desktop which is connected to the Internet.

You can't use your computers Internet connection to update your phone from the phone itself. If you want to use the computers Internet connection to update your phone you must update it through iTunes.

Visa write connection has been lost

When I tried to use visa write, sometimes I will get an "1073807194" error on VISA write. "Connection for the given session has been lost" The only way to get rid of the error is to reboot computer, but the communication only be good for a while, then I got the same error again.
Anyone know what it means? I searched the forum, back in 2001, someone post the same question, and the solution was to install NI VISA 2.5.2 But I am using LV8, NI VISA is 3.4 now.
Thanks,

Hi DGU,
I'm assuming that you are using VISA to communicate over TCP/IP. This error is indicating that a connection has been lost with the network. You can enable or disable this keep-alive checking using a VISA property node. Here's a link to the LabVIEW 8 Help information on how to use this:
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361A-01/lvvisaprop/tcp_keepaliveinstr/
There a few more helpful links in the Resources section of this page. Also, here's a KnowlegdeBase entry that explains how this keep-alive property works.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/072E607EE6E48AA986256F43005D2969?OpenDocument
Since rebooting fixes this issue, the problem may be with how Windows is handling this network. Is Windows reporting that the connection is being lost?
Michael Chaney
Systems Engineer - TestStand
National Instruments

Hi, I have a new laptop and would like to syncronise my iphone with iTunes (which I have installed again). But my old laptop has died so I could not transfer any media files, etc. Can I simply connect my iPhone to the laptop without any data being lost?

Hi, I have a new laptop and would like to syncronise my iphone with iTunes (which I have installed again). But my old laptop has died so I could not transfer any media files, etc. Can I simply connect my iPhone to the laptop without any data being lost?
Many thanks in advance!

you have a new phone and a new comp and you want to restore to your old data ?!
I can't think of anything but icloud, and what was purchased via itunes

Dodgy connection down to the exchange being overlo...

can anyone tell me why i get this happen to me 20 + times a week, it lasts for anythign up to 2 hours before finally connecting me to the internet, some days it doesnt happen but most days it happens at least 5 times
last week it must have happened 45 times in one day, i'm sure i spent more time waiting for hte connection to start than i did online, the thing is the dsl link light is on and i get a stable connection of around 948 / 7083 kbps sometimes it drops as low as 256/3500 but then it pops straight back up, oddley my line ip profile hasnt dropped at all
Jan 01 00:02:53 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:02:53 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:03:02 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:03:02 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:03:05 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:03:05 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:03:05 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:03:05 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:03:14 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:03:14 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:03:17 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:03:17 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:03:17 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:03:17 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:03:26 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:03:26 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:03:29 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:03:29 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:03:29 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:03:29 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:03:38 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:03:38 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:03:41 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:03:41 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:03:41 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:03:41 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:03:50 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:03:50 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:03:53 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:03:53 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:03:53 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:03:53 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:03:53 daemon pppd[391]: PPP LCP UP.
Jan 01 00:03:56 user syslog: ethctl eth0 vport query 2>/var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:03:56 user syslog: rm /var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:03:56 user syslog: ethctl eth1 vport query 2>/var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:03:56 user syslog: rm /var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:03:59 user syslog: ethctl eth0 vport query 2>/var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:03:59 user syslog: rm /var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:03:59 user syslog: ethctl eth1 vport query 2>/var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:03:59 user syslog: rm /var/vcfgerr
Jan 01 00:04:11 daemon pppd[391]: Remote message: CHAP authentication success, unit 5192
Jan 01 00:04:11 daemon pppd[391]: local IP address 86.178.145.160
Jan 01 00:04:11 daemon pppd[391]: remote IP address 217.32.147.104
Jan 01 00:04:11 daemon pppd[391]: primary DNS address 194.72.9.34
Jan 01 00:04:11 daemon pppd[391]: secondary DNS address 62.6.40.178
Jan 01 00:04:11 user kernel: KLOB extended to 3 pools
Jan 01 00:04:12 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 62.6.40.178#53
Jan 01 00:04:12 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 194.72.9.34#53
Jan 01 00:04:13 daemon pppd[391]: Received valid IP address from server. Connection UP.
Jan 01 00:04:14 user syslog: begin: interface: ppp_0_0_38_1 go to up
Jan 01 00:04:14 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 62.6.40.178#53
Jan 01 00:04:14 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 194.72.9.34#53
Jan 01 00:04:14 daemon UPNPD[386]: received signal 15, good-bye
Jan 01 00:04:16 daemon UPNPD[2034]: uuidvalue=uuid:0004ed9f-54de-0004-ed9f-54de0000b00
Jan 01 00:04:16 daemon UPNPD[2034]: HTTP listening on port 2800
Jan 01 00:04:18 user syslog: start Tr069
Jan 01 00:04:18 daemon user: Could not load verify locations
Jan 01 00:04:18 user syslog: end: interface: ppp_0_0_38_1 go to up
Jan 01 00:04:20 daemon user: tr69c: Unable to retrieve attributes in scratch PAD
Jan 01 00:04:20 daemon user: Stored Parameter Attribute data is corrupt or missing
Jan 01 00:04:35 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL link down
Jan 01 00:04:35 user syslog: tc qdisc del dev ppp_0_0_38_1 root 2>/dev/null
Jan 01 00:04:38 daemon pppd[391]: Terminating connection due to link down.
Jan 01 00:04:41 user kernel: Line 0: xDSL G.994 training
Jan 01 00:04:48 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 started
Jan 01 00:04:53 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 channel analysis
Jan 01 00:04:59 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 message exchange
Jan 01 00:05:00 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL link down
Jan 01 00:05:05 user kernel: Line 0: xDSL G.994 training
Jan 01 00:05:12 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 started
Jan 01 00:05:17 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 channel analysis
Jan 01 00:05:23 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 message exchange
Jan 01 00:05:23 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL link up, Path 0, us=948, ds=7083
Jan 01 00:05:25 daemon pppd[391]: Clear IP addresses. Connection DOWN.
Jan 01 00:05:25 daemon pppd[391]: Clear IP addresses.
Jan 01 00:05:25 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:05:31 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:05:31 daemon pppd[391]: Connect time 1.6 minutes.
Jan 01 00:05:31 daemon pppd[391]: Sent 10627 bytes, received 64 bytes.
Jan 01 00:05:31 user kernel: dev_shutdown, dec ppp device refcnt, dev->refcnt=3
Jan 01 00:05:32 user kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ppp_0_0_38_1 to become free. Usage count = -1
Jan 01 00:05:32 user kernel: dev->name = ppp_0_0_38_1, dev->refcnt=-1
Jan 01 00:05:32 user kernel: after reset to 0, dev->refcnt=0
Jan 01 00:05:32 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:05:33 user syslog: ping -c 1 8.8.8.8 &
Jan 01 00:05:33 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:05:33 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:05:33 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:05:42 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:05:42 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:05:45 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:05:47 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:05:47 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:05:47 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:05:56 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:05:56 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:05:59 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:06:01 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:06:01 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:06:01 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:06:10 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:06:10 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:06:13 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:06:14 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:06:14 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:06:14 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:06:23 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:06:23 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:06:26 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:06:28 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:06:28 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:06:28 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:06:37 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:06:37 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:06:40 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:06:42 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:06:42 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:06:42 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:06:51 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:06:51 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:06:54 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:06:55 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:06:55 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:06:55 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:07:04 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:07:04 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:07:07 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:07:09 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:07:09 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:07:09 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:07:18 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:07:18 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:07:21 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:07:23 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:07:23 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:07:23 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:07:32 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:07:32 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:07:35 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:07:36 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:07:36 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:07:36 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:07:45 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:07:45 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:07:48 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:07:50 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:07:50 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:07:50 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:07:59 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:07:59 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:08:02 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:08:04 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:08:04 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:08:04 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:08:13 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:08:13 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:08:16 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:08:17 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:08:17 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:08:17 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:08:26 daemon pppd[391]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Jan 01 00:08:26 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Jan 01 00:08:29 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Jan 01 00:08:31 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Jan 01 00:08:31 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Jan 01 00:08:31 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Jan 01 00:08:38 daemon pppd[391]: PPP LCP UP.
Jan 01 00:08:50 daemon pppd[391]: Remote message: CHAP authentication success, unit 20190
i assume the line i highlighted means that a few people came home turned on there equipment and i get booted out of the exchange untill someone else loggs off
i cant be doing with a connection like that, if thats what it is i will be after some compensation

Oct 15 13:13:16 daemon DHCP SERVER: DHCPINFORM from 192.168.1.104
Oct 15 13:13:19 daemon DHCP SERVER: DHCPINFORM from 192.168.1.104
Oct 15 13:37:46 syslog -- MARK --
Oct 15 13:48:16 daemon DHCP SERVER: DHCPINFORM from 192.168.1.104
Oct 15 13:48:19 daemon DHCP SERVER: DHCPINFORM from 192.168.1.104
Oct 15 14:07:23 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL link down
Oct 15 14:07:23 user syslog: tc qdisc del dev ppp_0_0_38_1 root 2>/dev/null
Oct 15 14:07:24 daemon pppd[391]: Terminating connection due to link down.
Oct 15 14:07:24 user kernel: Line 0: xDSL G.994 training
Oct 15 14:07:32 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 started
Oct 15 14:07:36 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 channel analysis
Oct 15 14:07:42 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 message exchange
Oct 15 14:07:43 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL link down
Oct 15 14:07:48 user kernel: Line 0: xDSL G.994 training
Oct 15 14:07:55 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 started
Oct 15 14:08:00 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 channel analysis
Oct 15 14:08:06 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL G.992 message exchange
Oct 15 14:08:07 user kernel: Line 0: ADSL link up, Path 0, us=949, ds=7043
Oct 15 14:08:08 daemon pppd[391]: Clear IP addresses. Connection DOWN.
Oct 15 14:08:08 daemon pppd[391]: Clear IP addresses.
Oct 15 14:08:08 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Oct 15 14:08:13 user syslog: web: logout (timeout)
Oct 15 14:08:14 daemon pppd[391]: Connection terminated.
Oct 15 14:08:14 daemon pppd[391]: Connect time 1162.1 minutes.
Oct 15 14:08:14 daemon pppd[391]: Sent 23031030 bytes, received 95144885 bytes.
Oct 15 14:08:14 user kernel: dev_shutdown, dec ppp device refcnt, dev->refcnt=3
Oct 15 14:08:15 user kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for ppp_0_0_38_1 to become free. Usage count = -1
Oct 15 14:08:15 user kernel: dev->name = ppp_0_0_38_1, dev->refcnt=-1
Oct 15 14:08:15 user kernel: after reset to 0, dev->refcnt=0
Oct 15 14:08:15 daemon pppd[391]: PPP: Start to connect ...
Oct 15 14:08:16 daemon pppd[391]: Using interface ppp0_0_38_1
Oct 15 14:08:16 daemon pppd[391]: Connect: ppp_0_0_38_1 <-->
Oct 15 14:08:16 daemon pppd[391]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500.
Oct 15 14:08:17 daemon pppd[391]: PPP LCP UP.
Oct 15 14:08:20 user syslog: web: 192.168.1.101 login
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon pppd[391]: Remote message: CHAP authentication success, unit 27277
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon pppd[391]: local IP address 109.145.252.13
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon pppd[391]: remote IP address 217.32.147.104
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon pppd[391]: primary DNS address 194.72.9.34
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon pppd[391]: secondary DNS address 62.6.40.178
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 62.6.40.178#53
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 194.72.9.34#53
Oct 15 14:08:21 daemon pppd[391]: Received valid IP address from server. Connection UP.
Oct 15 14:08:21 user syslog: begin: interface: ppp_0_0_38_1 go to up
Oct 15 14:08:22 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 62.6.40.178#53
Oct 15 14:08:22 daemon dnsmasq[61]: using nameserver 194.72.9.34#53
Oct 15 14:08:22 daemon UPNPD[4084]: received signal 15, good-bye
Oct 15 14:08:24 daemon UPNPD[5047]: uuidvalue=uuid:0004ed9f-54de-0004-ed9f-54de0000b00
Oct 15 14:08:24 daemon UPNPD[5047]: HTTP listening on port 2800
Oct 15 14:08:25 user syslog: start Tr069
Oct 15 14:08:27 daemon user: Could not load verify locations
Oct 15 14:08:28 user syslog: end: interface: ppp_0_0_38_1 go to up
Oct 15 14:08:28 daemon user: tr69c: Unable to retrieve attributes in scratch PAD
Oct 15 14:08:28 daemon user: Stored Parameter Attribute data is corrupt or missing
and again today the same thing

No users are being migrated to the Unified Contact Store (UCS) for Lync 2013 - Exchange 2013

I'm having difficulty getting the unified contact store to work on a migrated Lync/Exchange environment. Both servers have been upgraded to 2013 CU2, and almost everything appears to be working properly...except UCS.
By default the global CsUserServicesPolicy has UcsAllowed set to True. In that mode, none of the Lync users were being migrated to UCS, so I set the global policy to False and created a new Policy called "AllowUCS" and set UcsAllowed to True. I then
assigned that policy to myself and a couple other test accounts. Still, my contacts are not being migrated to the UCS after logging in with Lync 2013.
Other Lync/Exchange integration features are working properly. I have set up OAuth, and it tests successfully, and Lync integration with OWA is working successfully, so I know at least some communication is happening properly between the servers.
Here is what I'm getting when I run some diagnostics from the Lync server:
PS C:\Users\administrator> get-csuser jdoe |FL Name,UserServicesPolicy
Name : Jon Doe
UserServicesPolicy: AllowUCS
PS C:\Users\administrator> Get-CsUserServicesPolicy |FL
Identity : Global
UcsAllowed : False
Identity : Tag:AllowUCS
UcsAllowed : True
PS C:\Users\administrator> Debug-CsUnifiedContactStore -Identity [email protected] |FL
UcsMigrationAttemptCount : 0
LastUcsMigrationAttempt :
SipUri : [email protected]
UcsMode : Disabled
PS C:\Users\administrator> Debug-CsUnifiedContactStore -PoolFqdn lync.domain.org
FrontEnd : lbclync.domain.org
UcsDisabledCount : 141
UcsAllowedCount : 0
UcsMigratingCount : 0
UcsMigratedCount : 0
FailedUserData :
PS C:\Users\administrator> Test-CsUnifiedContactStore -UserSipAddr
ess [email protected] -TargetFqdn lync.domain.org
Target Fqdn :lync.domain.org
Result : Failure
Latency : 00:00:00.0654970
Error Message : User has not been migrated. Verify that the user has a mailbox
in Exchange and that the user has been migrated.
Diagnosis :
Anyone know what I am missing?

Hi,
Please make sure the user has been provisioned with an Exchange 2013 mailbox and has signed into the mailbox at least once.
If the user logs in with a Lync 2010 or earlier client, or if the user is not connected to an Exchange 2013 server, the user services policy is ignored and the user's contacts remain in Lync Server.
Please also check the registry key on the client computer:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Lync\<SIP URL>\UCS
If the user's contacts are stored in Exchange 2013, this key contains a value of InUCSMode with a value of 2165.
Kent Huang
TechNet Community Support

Outlook Anywhere Loosing connection : Outlook Event id 26 and Exchange IIS HTTPERR Log : Connection_Dropped_List_Full at the same time

Hi,
I have a Windows 2008R2 Updated / Exchange 2010 SP3 Rollup 7 (Role CAS,HUB,MBX) with only external users connection : ActiveSync, EWS, OWA, Outlook Anywhere.
4 processors and 24Go of memory are allocated to the Exchange server VM (VMWare).
Netscaller is used as reverse proxy in DMZ.
There is around 500 users connecting with Outlook Anywhere to Exchange. Users are using Outlook 2010 or 2013 with last updates and cache mode enabled (owner mailbox and delegations). Users are location all around the world (around 50 sites). So no users
is domain integrated.
Users are complaining about disconnection, and Outlook freeze (Outlook is not responding). This happened at any point of time during the day, and for different kind of actions (Outlook is just open, Try to press Send button, try to press Transfer button).
The freeze happened randomly for users. I have seen the problem, and Outlook sometimes freeze during few seconds, sometimes during 5 minutes without any reason. (no file copy, no action asked...)
I noticed that freeze are matching with the Outlook event id 26 on the workstation (Connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server has been lost. Outlook will restore the connection when possible). Also, at the same time, I can see around 200 lines in
the IIS HTTPERR Log (Exchange Server : C:\Windows\System32\LogFiles\HTTPERR) the following lines:
2014-11-20 10:39:43 NETSCALLERIP PORT EXCHANGEIP 443 HTTP/1.1 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCHANGEFQDN:6004 - 1 Connection_Dropped_List_Full MSExchangeOutlookAnyWhere
2014-11-20 10:39:43 NETSCALLERIP PORT EXCHANGEIP 443 HTTP/1.1 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCHANGEFQDN:6001 - 1 Connection_Dropped_List_Full MSExchangeOutlookAnyWhere
What has been already checked :
Check IOPS: seems to be normal
Check Processor consumption: seems to be normal
Netscaller TimeOut = 8h
Bandwidth where the server is hosted : more than enough
Bandwidth of client internet connection : Traffic do not increase when the problem happen
Firewall TimeOut : seems to be ok
Firewall Protocol Filter : seem to be ok
Workstation MTU : Ok : ping -l -f 1472 = Ok, so best MTU = 1500 (1472+28)
Outlook Profile : Clean Up OST, sync of all folders, download address book.
wireshark on workstation : nothing seems to be wrong but difficult to analyse, so I maybe missed something.
Configuration change on Exchange :
HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\RPC\MinimumConnectionTimeout = 120
Disable throttling Policy
Adsiedit, change Max Memory alloc for ESE : msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax = 327680 (around 10GB) msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin = 131072 (around 4GB
Adsiedit, change Min Memory alloc for ESE : msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin = 131072 (around 4GB)
Host file : add hostname and FQDN of Exchange Server
Disable IPV6 : HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\TCPIP6\Parameters\DisabledComponents = HEX 0xffffffff
IIS : system.applicationHost : webLimits : minBytesPerSecond = 0
Create dedicated IIS AppPool MSExchangeOutlookAnyWhere for /RPC and /RPCWithCert
AppPool MSExchangeOutlookAnyWhere : Regular Time Interval (minutes) : 0
AppPool MSExchangeOutlookAnyWhere : Queue Length : 20000 (Should be the solution but not working)
netsh int tcp set global chimney=disabled
netsh int tcp set global rss=disabled
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\MaxUserPort = 65534
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\KeepAliveTime : 300000
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\MaxConcurrentAPI = 150
IIS machine.config : <system.web> : requestQueueLimit="65535"
Microsoft.Exchange.RpcClientAccess.Service.exe.config <add key=”LoggingTag” value=”ConnectDisconnect, Logon, Failures, ApplicationData, Warnings, Throttling”/>
Uninstall All agents (except Backup Agent)
Uninstall Antivirus
Will be done tonight :
Exchange and DCs : HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters\MaxConcurrentAPI = 100
Exchange IIS : Increase AppPool MSExchangeOutlookAnyWhere Queue Length to 40000
Exchange : decrease HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\KeepAliveTime to 60000
You're welcome if you have any idea.
Thanks.
Jo.

Hi,
Thanks for your answer. Here are my comments :
1. Disable IPv6 then restart your Exchange server
Already done since the install of Exchange.
2. Confirm if there is any NLB device in your environment, please remove NLB firm client server
There is only one Exchange server in the Org. So no NLB installed on the server (NLB is used on the Netscaller used as a reverse proxy). In Addition, the article apply for Windows 2008, or the server is installed with Windows 2008 R2.
3. If there is a proxy server configured in IE, please uncheck it
I guess you are talking on the client side. There is no proxy on the client side, Outlook Anywhere connect directly to the internet.
4. Collect more error logs in Event Viewer in Exchange and collect the IIS logs in
folder “c:\inetpub\logs\logfiles\W3SVC1”
the error I reported in the description is from IIS, and always appear when end users report a problem. In W3SVC1 file, there is also errors, but those one appear even if Outlook clients are working fine. So I cannot isolate any specific
error. The most common from W3SVC1 log are :
2014-11-25 08:02:17 EXCHANGEIP POST /autodiscover/autodiscover.xml - 443 - NETSCALLERIP Microsoft+Office/15.0+(Windows+NT+6.1;+Microsoft+Outlook+15.0.4667;+Pro)
401 1 2148074254 0
2014-11-25 08:02:17 EXCHANGEIP POST /EWS/Exchange.asmx - 443 - NETSCALLERIP Mac_OS_X/10.9.5+(13F34)+CalendarAgent/176.2
401 1 2148074254 0
2014-11-25 08:02:18 EXCHANGEIP POST /EWS/Exchange.asmx - 443 - NETSCALLERIP Microsoft+Office/14.0+(Windows+NT+6.1;+Microsoft+Outlook+14.0.7128;+Pro)
401 1 2148074254 0
Regards,
Jo.

Outlook 2013 client, not in domain, can't connect to the Exchange 2010 server

Good Aftermoon,
Having issues it seems getting to the right forum but here is what I have. Currently we are running an Exchange 2010 server. OWA is configured and I am not having any issues with people connecting through it. The issue I am having is that any user that tries
to connect through Outlook 2013 gets an error message about the proxy server and then a certificate error. I have run the tests through the toolbox and get the following results.
Attempting to test potential Autodiscover URL https://autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org:443/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
Testing of this potential Autodiscover URL failed.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 694 ms.
Test Steps
Attempting to resolve the host name autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org in DNS.
The host name resolved successfully.
Additional Details
IP addresses returned: 69.89.25.150
Elapsed Time: 284 ms.
Testing TCP port 443 on host autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org to ensure it's listening and open.
The port was opened successfully.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 164 ms.
Testing the SSL certificate to make sure it's valid.
The SSL certificate failed one or more certificate validation checks.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 245 ms.
Test Steps
The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer is attempting to obtain the SSL certificate from remote server autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org on port 443.
The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer successfully obtained the remote SSL certificate.
Additional Details
Remote Certificate Subject: CN=*.bluehost.com, OU=PositiveSSL Wildcard, OU=Domain Control Validated, Issuer: CN=PositiveSSL CA 2, O=COMODO CA Limited, L=Salford, S=Greater Manchester, C=GB.
Elapsed Time: 201 ms.
Validating the certificate name.
Certificate name validation failed.
<label for="testSelectWizard_ctl12_ctl06_ctl00_ctl00_ctl01_ctl02_ctl01_tmmArrow">Tell
me more about this issue and how to resolve it</label>
Additional Details
Host name autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org doesn't match any name found on the server certificate CN=*.bluehost.com, OU=PositiveSSL Wildcard, OU=Domain Control Validated.
Elapsed Time: 1 ms.
Attempting to contact the Autodiscover service using the HTTP redirect method.
The attempt to contact Autodiscover using the HTTP Redirect method failed.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 234 ms.
Test Steps
Attempting to resolve the host name autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org in DNS.
The host name resolved successfully.
Additional Details
IP addresses returned: 69.89.25.150
Elapsed Time: 14 ms.
Testing TCP port 80 on host autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org to ensure it's listening and open.
The port was opened successfully.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 83 ms.
The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer is checking the host autodiscover.westmoreland-county.org for an HTTP redirect to the Autodiscover service.
The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer failed to get an HTTP redirect response for Autodiscover.
Additional Details
The URL specified in the location HTTP header was not HTTPS. URL: http://autodiscover.bluehost.com/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
HTTP Response Headers:
Keep-Alive: timeout=10, max=500
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 356
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:10:08 GMT
Location: http://autodiscover.bluehost.com/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
Server: Apache
Elapsed Time: 135 ms.
Our setup currently our domain is being hosted and the web master has control of domain settings.
I am fairly new to the Excchange Server world so any suggestions that you may have as to how I can resolve this would be great.
Bill

Hi Bill
Thank you for your pos.
You can use the following command to check whether you have purchased the certificate of audiscovery.westmoreload-country.org in your organization:
Get-ExchangeCertificate –server CASServerName | fl
For example: you want to return all certificates stored on the Client Access server named ClientAccess01, you will type the follow command in EMS.
Get-ExchangeCertificate -Server ClientAccess01 | fl
If you didn’t purchased the certificate of audiscovery.westmoreload-country.org, you could contact your certificate supplier.
You could refer to the following link:
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/940726?wa=wsignin1.0
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best regard,
Jim

Connection is being lost to the exchange?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for