Cons Group & Unit Display in Monitor

With the upgrade to EP3 the cons groups and units name displayed in the monitor are the short description instead of the long description as was previously the case.
It would be most appreciated if you would please suggest ways to change the names display from the short description to the long description.

HI Dan,
The display in Monitor works on standard future, and there is no customization involed in that as of now to display wither Short or Long description.
Else, you can keep the short description as same as Long description, I know this may not solve your problem if the length of Long Description is grater than short.
Also try contacting OSS help...
or in R/3 normally if we want any changes in the standard display, we will do the by copying the standard and make changes. So try using ABAP help, creating Own transaction code by copying the standard "UCMON" and apply necessary changes.
Give this as last preference, as this includes only technical work.

Similar Messages

Cons Group doesn't display in UCMON.

Hi,
In UCMON (From the menu GOTO-> List of Total Records)
1) when i click on List of Total Records it displays list of Journal Entries.
2) when i double click on one of the Journal Entry it displays the details of the entry.
3) when i double click on the one of the entry it goes to the Display Document screen.
my problem is i am not able to see the Cons Group on the Display Document screen.
I am able to see all the required details other than Cons Group.
I am using the posting level 30.
Thanks in advance.
rCm.

Cons group is only actually stored for posting level 02, 12,, 22 and 30 documents.
For all other records, the system derives the cons group during the query execution via the BCS virtual infocube's function module, which is pre-programmed with consolidations logic.
Therefore when the drilldown occurs, the system logic from the totals list is ignored for the document details.

SEM-BCS: Cons Group Field Required for Inter-Unit Elimination

Hi!
I need help.
I need to use document type for manual postings that allows me to indicate the cons group field.
I understand the PL10 is cons unit dependent only and not cons group.
I know that PL12 allows cons group posting.
But from what I understand PL12 is not captured in the inter-unit elimation task.
Is there other way?
Appreciate response.

Hi Adam and Eugene,
Thanks for the helpful response.
However I want my manual entries related to inter-unit elimination to reflect in one cons group only, considering that we have different hierarchies in our system.
The manual entries related to I/U elimation is basically an adjustment to the intercompany accounts. The purpose of my manual entries is to minimize the value of the difference of my intercompany accounts.
for example: (before interunit elimination)
Company A has intercompany accounts receivable of 100 USD with trading partner Company B
However, Company B recorded 50 USD intercompany payable with trading partner Company A. Company B has understated figure of 50 USd
To manually adjust in the BCS system, I'll post in Company B debit inventory and credit intercompany payable 50 with trading partner Company A.
Question is I want my adjusting entries to relfect only at the top hierarchy (one cons group) and not at the other cons group
Is there a way?
Please advice.
Thank you so much

Can Cons Group and Cons Unit hierarchies be used together?

We have Consolidation Group hierarchy defined in our BCS system. However, this hierarchy is not used for Budget data. Would it be possible to create a Consolidation Unit hierarchy in addition to the Consolidation Group hierarchy, to be used for Budget? Consolidation Group hierarchy already consists of Consolidation Units, so I wasn't sure if this was going to be possible.
I am a BW developer and have never done any development in BCS. I am asking this on behalf of a BCS user. I apologize if this question is too simple for this forum, but I would really appreciate it if someone could give me a quick answer to my question.
Thank you.
Nadia

I agree with Eugene that you can have different hierarchies for different purposes.
However one caution is that if you are using consolidation of investments and/or cons group changes tasks the result will differ between the hierarchies overall unless these tasks are executed separately for each hierarchy.

BCS Virtual Cube Cons Group Change

Hi,
We have a number of Bex reports that read from the BCS virtual cube for our month end reporting.
Quite recently, we prerfomed some Cons Group changes in the BCS application which has impacted our Bex reports via the virtual cube.
If we check the contents of the virtual cube with Cons Group displayed in the output, we see it is missing data (period blank) and this is the data that is being extracted to our Bex report.
If however we check the contents of the virtual cube without diplaying Cons Group, then we get our disired result.
Has anyone experienced anything similiar? Is it possible to get Bex to read the data we require?
Thanks in advance.

It is suggested you read the SAP BCS help for cons group changes.
In most cases the cons units should not be removed from the "divesting" cons group when adding it to another cons group. The cons group master data for the "divesting" cons group should simply be updated for these units with a period/year of divestiture - the period of change.
Additionally the cons group changes tasks move the balance sheet items from the "divesting" cons group to the "acquiring" group with posting level 02. 12 and 22 records to allow for reporting of pre- and post- change reporting on these cons groups.

Cons Group Changes & Divestiture with Equity Holdings

In the scenario with cons unit hierarchy below, company A is the parent of company B and B is the parent of C and D. B is accounted for using purchase method, while C and D are equity method.
Cons Group A
     Cons unit A
     Cons group B
          Cons unit B
          Cons unit C
          Cons unit D
Company B is sold, along with its subsidiaries C and D. In periods previous to the divestiture, there are intercompany transactions between B, C and D, for which eliminations are recorded at posting level 20. For standard reporting these eliminations are ignored for both cons groups A and B due to C and D using equity method.
In Cons of Investment settings, Posting level 20 records are not included in location of values, calculation base.
In the period of divestiture, the cons group changes for posting level 22 are created. However, these are recorded directly to cons group B, and are therefore also included in reporting for cons group A. This is causing a problem because the reports exclude the level 20 records but include the offsetting level 22 records.
Has anyone dealt with this and if so how?
Am I missing something?
Thanks for any experiences relating to this and/or suggestions!
Dan

Just extending the same point,
system will generate the 22 PL records where in both
consolidation unit and partner unit of the group participating
in eliminations follow purchase method.
In your case B (parent company ) is following purchase
method and investee are following equity method.
so 22 PL records are not expected.
since it happened other way , some wild idea may be to check
whether there is any method change during consolidation
interval.

SEM-BCS: Need to limit execution of Task to Particular Cons. Unit

Hi! All,
I have reclass that is limited to certain company code say 1000 that I define in Method. However, when the same task in Monitor for any other company code say 4312, the system runs the reclass and gives an Error message like Error in Cons Unit Processing - You have set up cross-consolidation unit reclassification. You want to reclassify data from one consolidation unit to another. An error occurred in this process. This error prevents the documents involved from being saved. How can I limit the Reclass task from being performed by 4312The monitor shows this task for all cons. Units...
Thanks for your input.
Regards,
Victor

Hi Victor,
How do you limited a reclass to a particular company code?

HT3382 Connect from a MacBook Pro's mini display port to a Display Port monitor?

Hello everyone,
Is it possible to connect from a MacBook Pro's mini display port to a Display Port monitor with resolutions higher than 1920 x 1200? It seems Apple does not supply a mini-DP to DP adapter.
However, just as they do not make a mini-DP to HDMI adapter, but they do recommend a Belkin product for this purpose.
Is there any reason that a mini-DP to DP adapter or cable wouldn't work and support high resolutions?
Thanks for your feedback!

danz0r wrote:
Hey tjk,
Thanks for the response.
Do you have any recommendations for a potential set up? The audio output and Apple DVI are on different sides of my MBP, which is alright, I guess I can get two long cables to handle each. I was hoping to just have my MBP closer to where I use it, with a cord nearby plugged in on one side to the HDTV and resting near where I keep my MBP for when I want to use the HDTV as an external monitor.
With a converter like this, you can run video out of the MBP's DVI port, and miniToslink (optical) audio out of the 3.5mm stereo mini jack to the converter, then it will combine the two and output audio and video through HDMI to the monitor.
http://www.supermediastore.com/product/u/apogee-dvi-to-hdmi-converter-spdif-opti cal-toslink-coaxial-input-output?utm_source=cj&utm_medium=aff&utm_content=HDMI+A ccessories
Otherwise, depending on the TV's inputs, for video you could run DVI to DVI on the TV, or DVI to HDMI to the TV. For audio you could run 3.5mm stereo mini plug from the MBP to RCA adapter on the TV. Toslink/optical is also an option.

Daisy chain two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) to new Mac mini Thunderbolt?

Everything I read said that I could hook up a display port monitor to a Thunderbolt port on the mac mini. I purchased two display port monitors (Dell U2913WM) that can be daisy chained, and hooked them up. All I get is mirroring. Does anyone know how to turn off mirroring with this setup? I did not get the "uncheck mirroring" option in preferences until I hooked up the second via the HDMI port instead of a daisy chain. The problem with that is, I cannot take advantage of the full resolution through the HDMI. It seems I have wasted my money on two monitors.
Looking for advice on:
1) How to daisy chain these two Dell monitors to the mac mini and turn off mirroring and use an extended desktop, or
2) How to take advantage of the full resolution through HDMI port?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

So re-reading this thread, I now realize you did exactly what I wanted to do but your issue was having a cloned vs. extended desktop. Oops!
I believe your "nothing plugged in" issue is the cable. I'm not sure that TB cables are backwards compatible with DP - I think it's only the ports. Do you see multiple monitors in "System Preferences > Displays" if you hook the monitors up like you described in your OP?
My Dell U2713H arrived today and it works like a charm with the supplied Mini-DP to DP cable. The built-in display on my 13" mid 2009 MBP still works if not in clamshell mode, although I will mostly use mine in my HengeDock. In the OSD of the monitor, you can access "Display Settings > Display Info" and it will show you the DP capability. Mine is only DP 1.1a and I believe to run 2 of these at full resolution you will need the bandwidth in DP 1.2 which includes MST (daisy-chaining). This could be your problem.
Can you access the same menu in your OSD and report back what your DP compatability is?
Thanks!
mgb

How to create a group of servers where monitor runs of one of them

Hello,
I have a group of Linux servers where I want to monitor some processes. Important is that the process have to run minimum 1 and maximum 1 time on server A or B or C. If I add my server group to the process monitor I got error events that the process is not
running on server A and C because B is actually the active one.
How can I configure that this process has to run 1 time on one of these servers?
Regards, Doreen

Hi,
How about trying aggregate monitor?
Aggregate monitors group multiple monitors to provide a single health aggregated health state. This provides an organization to all of the monitors targeted at a particular class and provides a consolidated health state for specific categories of
operation.
Please refer to the below link for more details:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh457599.aspx
Regards,
Yan Li
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Change of Company code from one Cons Group to another Cons Group.

Dear All,
Please advise on change of company code from one Cons Group to another Cons Group , we have Cons Structure - at present few companies are in one cons group and as a policy we have to move the companies to another cons group. So please advise me what will be the case if we move int he following senarios:
1. if till period 012 year 2008, company A is in Cons Group AA and we want the same to Cons Group BB. How it will move to Cons Group BB in a Company code with the opening balances?
2. if there is no data in SEM BCS total Cube - and we want to move the Company A from Cons Group AA to Cons Group BB.
What will be the effect in both the scenarios. How to do this? if you can specify some steps then I will try to analyze the situation.
Thanks in advance

The changes are not complicated but company A must be placed in cons group BB as of period 12 2008 and in the master data of the cons group it should be indicated that the first consolidation is at the end of the period (EOP). Likewise in cons group AA must continue to include company A but in the cons group master data it must be indicated that the period of divestiture is 12 2008 EOP.
The cons group changes tasks must be executed to move the balances in period 12 2008.
If there is not data for company A in the totals infocube you may simply drag-and-drop company A from cons group AA to cons group BB without any concerns.
The affect in each scenario is different because if there is data that is to be reported as part of cons group AA company A must be included in cons group AA.

A1081 Cinema Display LCD Monitor compatibility

I am about to buy a reconditioned A1081 Cinema Display LCD Monitor 20"? But i need to know if it will work with my MacBook Pro 10.5.8 and my ipad 2? As i am buying it to use at an exhibition. iIf so what adaptor will i need to hook both of these up? Thank you in advance.

Are you sure the monitor is set to receive input over the VGA input? Have you tried the DVI input on the monitor? You may have better luck with DVI.

Video input/ iMac display as monitor

Hello everybody,
I have got a feature request for future releases of the iMac series. I think I would not be the only one appreciating a solution to use an iMac's display as monitor for other computing devices such as the Mac mini or older PC-hardware. In my opinion this video input would not have to be more than another little port at the back of an iMac. This could be solved with a mini-port like it is now with the mini-DVI.
When trying to find a way to use my iMac that way I only found this vnc solution which requires a network connection between both devices but I also found many posts asking for a solution like my proposal.
Please let me know what you think of it! Thanks in advance!

It's not that easy. Providing a direct input to the monitor would require quite a bit of additional circuitry. I think that the cost of providing such in input would be unjustifiable when considering the small percentage of iMac buyers who would use such a feature. But you can suggest it to Apple here:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/imac.html
For a workaround, perhaps Screen Recycler would work for you.

How do I display external monitor as sole display, rather than mirroring, with lid open?

How do I display external monitor as sole display, rather than mirroring, with lid open?

sudo nvram boot-args="iog=0x0" restart to take effect

I have an Apple Cin HD Display 23" monitor, purchased in 2006. I use it with a old PC (2007) running Win XP. Works fine. Can this monitor be used with a new PC with Intel 4th gen i5 processor, running Win 8.1?

I have an Apple Cin HD Display 23" monitor (part no. M9178LL/A), purchased in 2006. I use it with an old PC (2007) running Windows XP. Works fine. Can this monitor be used with a new PC with Intel 4th gen i5 or i7 processor, running Win 8.1?

I have an Apple Cin HD Display 23" monitor (part no. M9178LL/A), purchased in 2006. I use it with an old PC (2007) running Windows XP. Works fine. Can this monitor be used with a new PC with Intel 4th gen i5 or i7 processor, running Win 8.1?

Cons Group & Unit Display in Monitor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for