Consalidated companies 0 and are different

Hello Experts,
When I am processing with f-06 am getting the error consolidate companies 0 and ' ' are different.This is happening when it is with more than one customer.I have gone through some threads in forum but it is all about vendor and document type,but in my case it is when i use multiple customer.Please explain as to how i will proceed with that.
Thanks

Hello Binoj,
The message number is f5080
Diagnosis
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two differen companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.

Similar Messages

  • F.13 Consolidated companies " " and " " are different

    Hello gurus,
    I have seen many threads on this, but I have yet to find one to answer my particular issue. 
    When we run F.13, we are getting the error message stated in the subject line above.  We are using two document types here:
    WE:  Goods receipt
    RE:  Incoming invoice
    I have checked the document types in OBA7, and both have been flagged to "Allow Inter-company posting" and "Enter Trading Partner".
    I have checked the Master data for the vendor and the trading partner field is filled in.  I can not clear out this field, since it is used for some of our quarterly reporting.
    When I go into FBL3N to look at the item lines, I am seeing that the items lines with document type WE (goods receipt) is pulling the number in the master data in to the trading partner field.  This is correct.
    However, when I look in FBL3N at the item lines with document type RE (incoming invoice) the trading partner field is blank.  We enter out invoices via MIRO. 
    Does anyone know why the "RE" document is not pulling in the trading partner number?
    Thanks for your help,
    Rhonda

    Hello Dominic,
    Here is how I have the document types configured:
    WE: (Goods receipt), has the "Allow inter-company posting" flagged on.  Plus, the posted document has the trading partner displayed.
    RE: (Incoming invoice), has the "Allow inter-company posting" flagged off.  Plus, the posted document does not have the trading partner dispalyed.
    So, it matches your train of thought in above response.  However, I am still getting the same error on the pre-existing documents.
    Then I have tried every other combination between the two document types and I keep getting the same error.  The pre-existing documents will not clear.
    Is there a way to update the trading partner field in the pre-existing documents?
    Sorry for all the questions.
    I really appreciate all that you have done for me.
    Thank you so much for your help,
    Rhonda

  • F5080 error: Consolidated Companies & and & are different - HR

    Hi Experts
    We are trying to post the payroll and error F5080 comes up.  It refers to Trading partner and / or Intercompany posting which I have set  in the document type.  I have searched the net and OSS, but can't find a solution for HR.
    Can anyone please help?
    Kind regards
    Dawn

    Hi,
    For that Document Type, in control data- uncheck intercopany postings

  • Error through F-44 that  Consolidated  companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Dear Expert
    At the time of Vendor clearing through F-44 I get the
    warning message that "Withholding tax information ignored"
    where Withholding tax related customization and master has
    been updated accordingly. If I ignore the same warning
    and save the document as my all Debit and Credit transactions
    are of equal amount ,i m getting the error that "Consolidated
    companies 1000 and ' ' are different.
    What specific setting is required for the same.
    Thanks in advance
    VG

    Hi,
    If you are getting error F5 080 then most probably this is because one of the documents to be cleared contains a different trading partner (field BSEG-VBUND).
    Please check the contents of each customer/vendor line item concerning this field. The field can be viewed on the customer/vendor line item via button 'more data'. If the contents is different you have either to clear the items individually or you have to change the settings of the document type used for clearing.  You can find out what document type is used for clearing in OBXH in the 'transfer with postings section'.  Afterwards you can go to OBA7 and mark the flags 'Inter-company postings' and 'Enter trading partner'.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different

    Hi team,
    While clearing TDS Salary GL system showing below error
    Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different
         Message no. F5080
    Diagnosis
         The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected
         document type for all line items. In this case at least two different
         companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does
         not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
         If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a
         document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please
         correct the entered account.
    Actually what we done..........
    1) In salary entry which was passed by HR payroll, we have distributed cost from company Code-2011 to another company code-5011.
    2) Manse some staff in 2011 cost booked in another company code 5011.
    3) in that way system passed automatic inter-company transaction, which is correct.
    5) but while doing clearing of inter company GLs & other accounts wherever these type of document selected then system throwing above error.
    Please guide use.

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Can anyone tell me the how to solve this error "Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different"  which I am getting in F-04
    Thanks,
    Madan

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Error: Consolidated companies DCIUS and ' ' are different

    Hi All,
    When I try to post vendor invoice in FB60 I get the above given error . Message No. F5080.
    I have created a group company and assigned to the expense GL account master in trading partner field.
    GL is mapped to the group GL account.
    No error is shown if I enter the group company id in the vendor master in the "trading partner" field.
    But the vendor is not a cross company. My understanding is, we use the trading partner field in vendor master only if the vendor is an affiliated company.
    What could be the reason for the error and how can I resolve this ?
    Thanks
    Anil

    Hi Murali,
    Thanks for your reply.
    1. This is not an inter co postings. So I don't find any need to activate the same in doc type.
    2. The error is shown only when I remove trading partner from vendor master (vendor is not a cross company).
    3. Consolidation is required. But I have given the trading partner and group GL in all the GL accounts.
    So I am at a loss why this error occurs.
    Thanks
    Anil

  • Consolidated companies are different

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as consolidated companies are different. pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as "consolidated companies xxxx and " are different". pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

  • Consolidated companies 1000, 1500 are different

    hi ,
    when tried to do PGI(post goods issue) i am getting the below error
    "consolidated companies (1000, 1500) are different ".
    please suggest me .
    regards,
    deepa

    PGI is the point where FI entries related to goods getting delivered are genereated.
    Normally Finished Goods and Cost of Goods Sold GL of the same comapny are hit.
    I guess in the particular case Finished Goods GL of one company code and cost of goods sold of different company is getting hit.
    Thanks,
    Ashish

  • I have a few hundred duplicates in my iPhoto library, but the file sizes are different.  So one is 1.3mb and one is 567kb.  I want to delete the smaller ones, but short of comparing each duplicate, is there a way to do this?

    I have a few hundred duplicates in my iPhoto library, but the file sizes are different.  So one is 1.3mb and one is 567kb.  I want to delete the smaller ones, but short of comparing each duplicate, is there a way to do this?  I've been looking at Duplicate Annhilator but I don't think it can do it.
    Thanks!

    I just ran a test with iPhoto Library Manager, Duplicate Annihilator, iPhoto Duplicate Cleaner, Duplifinder and Photodedupo.  I imported a folder of 5 photos into a test library 3 times, allowing iPhoto to import duplicates.  I then ran the 5 photos thru resizer to reduce their jpeg compression but all other aspects of the file the same.
    None of the duplicate removal apps found set that was reduced in the file resizer. That's probably due to the fact that the file creation date was being used as a criteria and the resized photo would have a different file creation date even though the Image Capture date was the same.
    They all found the 3 regular duplicates and some of them would mark two and leave the 3rd unmarked.  iPhoto Duplicate Cleaner can sort the found duplicates by file size but if the file was edited to get the reduced file size it might not be found as it would have a different file creation/modification date. 
    iPhoto Library Manage was able to find all duplicates and mark them as such if the file names were the same the the filename option was selected.  Otherwise it also missed the modified, resized version.  It allowed one to select the one photo to save before going to work on the library.
    So if a photo has been reduced in image quality or pixel size it will not be considered a duplicate.
    OT

  • HT4759 My iCloud email address and my apple ID are different. I would like to change my iCloud to be the same as my apple ID. However I don't know my iCloud password and don't use the email address it belongs to. When I try to change the password, apple b

    My iCloud email address and my apple ID are different. I would like to change my iCloud to be the same as my apple ID. However I don't know my iCloud password and don't use the email address it belongs to. When I try to change the password, apple brings me to a page to reset my apple ID password (which I know and don't want to change). I have even tried to delete my iCloud account completely to start again but am not allowed without the iCloud password (which I don't have) there doesn't seem to be a place to change the email address of iCloud. What can I do?

    This is the answer that I had expected, so in this case you could only change your gmail.com address to another providers email addres e.g. outlook.com, yahoo.com, etc., but you won't be able to change the gmail.com address to a icloud.com email address. Apple just won't let you do that.
    Your iCloud account with @icloud.com email address and you Apple ID with gmail.com address are already connected and as I said before, Apple just let you merge this two IDs together.

  • I plug my computer into my stereo and use the remote app on my iPhone to control it. How can I control my wires iPad with the remote app on my iphone when it is plugged into the stereo? they are different iTunes accounts.

    I plug my computer into my stereo and use the remote app on my iPhone to control it. How can I control my wires iPad with the remote app on my iphone when it is plugged into the stereo? they are different iTunes accounts.

    I think this is probably a sign that your network could be better than it is.
    Intermittent problems are often a result of interference. Interference can be caused by other networks in the neighbourhood or from household electrical items.
    You can download and install iStumbler (NetStumbler for windows users) to help you see which channels are used by neighbouring networks so that you can avoid them, but iStumbler will not see household items.
    Refer to your router manual for instructions on changing your wifi channel or adjusting your multicast rate.
    There are other types of problems that can affect networks, but this is by far the most common, hence worth mentioning first.

  • Utilization(J2IUN) in case of Sales plant and Mfg plants are different

    Hello,
    we are having two company codes 1000 and 2000,
    1000 is having the Manufturing plant- 1000
    2000 is having the sales plant      - 2000
    Both the plant are having the same excise group-10
    The company will procure a materials in 1000 plant and CENVAT is credited at 1000 Plant. The 1000 plant never dispatch materials to customers,  The company want to take Monthly utilization from 2000 company code and 2000 plant.
    The company first make STO from 1000 plant to 2000 (Inter company STO), then 2000 company will sell that material to customer or delear or etc.
    Manufaturing plant and disptach plants are different
    How to take utilization in above said scenario.
    Regards
    sapman man

    Hi
    we are having two company codes 1000 and 2000,
    1000 is having the Manufturing plant- 1000
    2000 is having the sales plant - 2000
    Both the plant are having the same excise group-10
    The company will procure a materials in 1000 plant and CENVAT is credited at 1000 Plant. The 1000 plant never dispatch materials to customers, The company want to take Monthly utilization from 2000 company code and 2000 plant.
    The company first make STO from 1000 plant to 2000 (Inter company STO), then 2000 company will sell that material to customer or delear or etc.
    Manufaturing plant and disptach plants are different
    How to take utilization in above said scenario.
    As per above your input would like narrate as under.
    As per SAP & Statutory norms Utilization is only happen when you avail credit and availing of credit is only possible when your plant is register with Excise thats only possible when you can declare your plant is in actively invloves in manfacturing activity ( Input and out put material will be differ) then you can register with Excise and get excise register the sam eyou can maintain in J1ID.
    Now coming t your case which not possible as plant 2000 becomes Depot and depot scenario you can not utilize as you are not availing any input credit.
    Son what you can do is pass the credit to 2000 plant and utilise in 1000 plants which is quite easy
    And request you to create two different excise group as you can not assign same excise group to plant and deopt.
    Hope this helps you

  • I have a macbook pro, and i want to transfer my hard drive from my macbook, but the display drivers and such are different.  How do i do this?

    I have a macbook pro, and i want to transfer my hard drive from my macbook (500g), but the display drivers and such are different.  How do i do this and is it possible?
    The Macbook Pro has Mac OS X 10.4.11 (70g hard drive)
    The Macbook has Mac OS X 10.6.8 (500g hard drive)

    The MacBook's hard drive lacks the necessary hardware drivers to boot the MacBook Pro even though it has a much newer OS on it; that's why simply moving it into the Pro doesn't work. Presumably you have a very old MB Pro, because only the very first MB Pro model (produced January to May 2006) was ever offered with an 80GB hard drive. Are you sure you want to move your big drive into such an old machine? The MacBook must be newer, because the first MacBook was introduced just as the first Pro model was discontinued.

  • TS1741 Streaming from my iPad to my tv is not working, it keeps saying the iTunes accounts are different but I've checked it a ton of times and its the same, anyone had the same problem?

    Streaming from my iPad to my tv is not working, it keeps saying the iTunes accounts are different but I've checked it a ton of times and its the same, anyone had the same problem?

    Hi JenJen73,
    If you are having issues with AirPlay streaming from your iPad to your Apple TV, you may want to take a look at the troubleshooting steps in the following article:
    Apple Support: Troubleshooting AirPlay and AirPlay Mirroring
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts4215
    Cheers,
    - Brenden

Maybe you are looking for