Consignment PIR not selected on PR during MRP

Hello,
I'm facing a problem where the consignment PIR is not selected in PR during PR creation through MRP run.
Sourcing happens correctly and the supplier number in Source List is assigned to fixed vendor.
However the info-record field is blank.
Surprisingly, if I do 'Assign Source of Supply' for the same PR through ME52N, the PIR is picked up and assigned to the PR.
I saw this one thread in the forums and I think its the same issue but there is no solution.
Planned delivery time not picking up from consignment purchase info record?
Has anyone encountered this problem and are there any corrections?
Thanks.

Thanks for your response.
I have only one source and its marked MRP relevant.
"......supplier number in Source List is assigned to fixed vendor." - My mistake - this should read supplier number in Source List is assigned to fixed vendor field in the PR."
Does this make more sense now.
I think my problem and the link I provided to planned delivery time is related to the same root cause. If SAP is not updating the requistion with a PIR, its not reading the PIR info and hence planned delivery time from PIR.
As for he OSS, I read the question and its answer
Why does the system not use the expected planned delivery time from the info record?
The MRP group in material master has the flag 'Scheduling according to purchasing info record or agreement' maintained for plant code used
Source List entry is correct and matches the special procurement key.
What surprised me the most that although MRP picks up the correct source, it does not look at the PIR for that source does not populate the PIR in the requsition. However, manual source determination considers the PIR populates the PIR number

Similar Messages

Selection of BOM During MRP

Dear All,
I have three alternatives of BOM.The lot size and the validity period for all the boms is same.Now during MRP Run the system only selects the first alternative and plans the depending materials of that BOM.
I want to set the system in such a way that i can able to select any alternative of bom and carry out the MRP Run.
Please help me ..
Regards
Prashant

Hi Prashant,
With same valid From & To Date and Same Lot Size,
In this case system will select first BOM alternative.
If you want to choose a particular BOM then go for production version ,assuming that u r not willing to change the lot size or valid from & to date,then u lock the production versions which you dont want to show to the system before running MRP except the one which u r willing to choose.
We cant choose manually the prod.version during MRP.
Assuming that in MRP4 view of FERT material u have given option 2 in BOM slection method.
The other way is u manitain different lot size and acccordingly the production version will be selected by the system.
I hope it will help you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Production orders not to be considered during MRP run

Dear SAPeers,
i want to know how to ensure that open production orders are not considered during the MRP run.
the following is the scenario.
PIR for march after MRP run creates a planned order. this planned order is converted to production order. now this production order is processed but not completely confirmed and TECOed after a certain quantity has been produced.
now we delete the old PIR and create a new PIR in the next month. now we revoke the TECO status of the production order and run MRP. I want to know how to avoid MRP from considering the open production order and create planned order for the complete PIR quantity.
Thanks and Regards
Srinivasan

Srini,
what i am worried is shortfall of raw materials in case they were to open the production order in the current month after the planning has been done. how do we allocate raw materials for both the plan as well as the open production order?
Okay, you presumably had RM available for all of your production orders (and those RM were balanced by the reservations from the production orders). Now, you TECO the production order. In effect, any un-issued RM are now released and freely available for other orders/planned orders. Now you plan the following month. Those RM that were freed can and will be used for the new plan. Odd business process, but OK. Now, you re-open the production orders, and, yes, you will have a shortage unless you run RM MRP again. This is, ah, inconsistent with any business process I have ever seen.
The question that jumps to mind is, "Why re-open the old production orders at all? Alternatively, why were they TECOd in the first place?" If one knows that he intends to complete an order in production, one does not normally TECO the order, and then later reverse the TECO.
With respect to my name, I must unfortunately keep a low profile. Ever since I escaped from the mental institution, the thought-police have been hunting for me. I do not wish to be the recipient of any further electroshock 'treatments'.
Rgds,
DB49

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run. I have maiantained source list for the material with proper validity date and also maintained scheduling agreement . MRP relevvant Indicator , I have marked - 2 which means -Record relevant to MRP. Sched. lines generated automatically.
Still I am not able to get schedule lines and instead of that *Purchase Requisitions* are getting generated.
Can any one help me and suggest me what to be done in this case .
Thanks & Regards ,
Nirmalya

Dear,
Welcome to SDN,
In transaction OMDT you have to enable the indicator create schedule lines
In MD02 MRP control Prameter here select the Delivery schedules -3- Schedule line. Processing Key as NETCH and Planning Mode - 3 delted and recreated.
Maintain source list ME01, in that put MRP indicator as '2' i.e. schedule lines via MRP.Put your agreement no in that.
If u run MRP properly u will get schedule lines automatically in ME38.
Make the schedule agreement, make it source relevent in the source list make is FIX and MRP indicator as 3.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Contract number is not being picked during MRP run

Hi,
I have a contract with vendor as V1.
This contract is MRP revelant with source list maintained with MRP revelant.
Source list maintained with vendor V1, contract and with fixed indicator and with MRP relevant indicator set.
Step 1
Now I am executing MRP, system is creating PR with contract vendor V1 as source of supply is V1 in source list.
This step is OK.
Step 2
After this I am maintaining sub contracting vendor V2 in contract.
Again I am executing MRP run, system is creating PR, but the PR is not picking the contract details.
I am expecting this PR, which supposed to be created in this Step 2 should have vendor V2 as source of supply.
Am I correct?
Note: Source list is still having vendor as V1, same contract number, with fixed indicator and MRP relevent option set.
Any input if process is OK or if some thing wrong is apprecited,
Thanks
Dipak

Hi,
Ok.
I am following this way -
In ME32K, there is a delivery address button available is transaction tool bar, there I am maintaining the subtracting vendor number and enabling the SC vendor check option so that this vendor flows to PR which gets created during MRP run and comes to PR delivery address tab i.e., in vendor field as subcontracting vendor with SC vendor check option selected.
Am I correct ?
Thanks
Dipak

During sync, new contacts on my iphone are deleted. The option in iTunes to replace contacts on my iphone is not selected. Is there a way to merge info on sync instead of replace?

During sync, new contacts on my iphone are deleted. I'll typically add any new contacts I get directly to my iphone, simply because I don't have my mac on me at all times. However, unless I specifically add the contact to my mac address book, it will be deleted from my iphone contacts upon sync. The option in iTunes to replace contacts on my iphone is not selected. Is there a way to merge info on sync instead of replace?

Thank you for your reply. I realy have nothing else to sync - no music. Emails do work so its just my contacts I am concerned about. I'm kinda new at this but have a working understanding of the system.
I have an icloud account but the Geek Squad went there and tried but could not export contacts. I truly am not that good re icloud. They worked exclusively with my itunes, re-downloading, etc - all of the stuff in their book.
I have not tried a complete restore because I am not sure I am that good with the equipment but could. I did all of the stuff on the help page - sync reset, forced one-way sync etc but the phone just does not seem to recognize the sync. I have not gone to an Apple store to have them have a look - that may be my next step to hook up to another itunes computer. It seems simple to me - it was working fine until maybe 3 months ago - probably when there was an update. Its telling to me that the phone does not tell me there is a sync in process while itunes is saying there is - its just not biting between the 2.
I appreciate any hep - and I said, I not stupidi about these things but have kind of reached as far as I am comfortable with fear of doing something really wrong.

Hello, a cant type anything ,not in photoshop and not in inIllustrator ,I've got a message like "selected font faild during last operation".If problem persists,please desable the font..

Hello, a cant type anything ,not in photoshop and not in inIllustrator ,I've got a message like "selected font faild during last operation".If problem persists,please desable the font..

Looks like a corrupt font.
Illustrator is more picky about fonts than any other application.

HT2646 Apple TV will not let me select my language during initial set up

Apple TV will not allow me to select my language during the initial set up. It simply stays on the initial first page saying I can select my language. Unfortunately, every time I hit "select" on the remote, it will not recognize that I am trying to select my language (English). Therefore I cannot get to any of remaining set up.

Welcome to the Apple Community.
Check you are using the correct location in the Apple TV store settings.
Try changing a few details and changing them back before updating when you verify in iTunes, also check that your details are correct (ie that you have filled the state field out properly and so on)
Rentals don't just show up on the Apple TV when you have rented then on your mac/PC,you need to transfer them.
See This

BOM selection during MRP running

Hi,
   I have a question about BOM selection during MRP running...
   I have three production version and all of them are valid at the same time..I get a problem "no BOM data seletion" during MRP
running..I suspect it is due to that I have three production version and MRP didn't know take which one..Can anyone tell me
where can i config it or what's wrong with it in my situation?
   btw,BOM usage and stats are correct .so is the router data..since MRP is running well if i only have one PV..thanks..

Hi Monst,
Looking at the screenshots you uploaded, it seems that the validity of each of the production version is from 7.12.2011 to 1.12.2012.
Please check whether for Planned order no. 36659 alternative BOM no. 1 is getting selected (Since BOM selection ID is 2).
For planned order nos. 36660, 36661 and 36662, the start date is perhaps before 7.12.2011 and end date as we can see lies in the validity period of production version. Hence, neither of the alternatives of the BOM is getting selected.
For verifying the above logic, please make the BOM selection method as 3 (selection only by production version) and run the MRP. I think MRP will get terminated in this case since no BOM will be chosen for first planned order.
Just in case u need to select the BOM for planned orders, you can manually enter the production version no. in the planned order change mode.
Please tell if this helps and revert back.
Regards,
Chetan.

Urgent: Employees not selected during Payroll Posting

Dear Friends,
I am trying to post payroll for a payroll area consisting of 4 employees, however the posting run is evaluated for 1 employee only, rest 3 employees are not selected/evaluated during the posting run. On debugging RPCIPE00, it has been found that the 3 employees do not have Relationship A209 in table HRP1001 and as such they are not evaluated. I do not know what the problem is as the posting document is successfully created for 1 employee.
Please help me out to find a solution to this problem.
This is urgent!!!
Thanks & Regards

Hi Arya,
Thanks a lot for your reply. The document is now created for all the 4 employees. However, I am unable to understand why this is required. The document of report says that this is automatically created by the system when the employee is hired. In case of upgrade one may be required to run this report. But ours is a new implementation. So why do we require to run this report.
Also, I tried running posting by hiring new employee, but again there is no CP for this employee and hence no document.
Please help.
Thanks & Regards,
Vivek

How to stop joint stereo during mp3 import when it's not selected.

I use iTunes to manage my mp3 purchased from other music stores (tracsource, etc). For some reason, iTunes changes my file from stereo to joint stereo even though joint stereo is not selected. I have searched the web for days prior to this post with no success. I understand all of the reported benefits of joint stereo but prefer to not have my files altered in any way. Is there any way to disable completely? Any information is appreciated.
Thanks.

This is very helpful and assists with narrowing down my issue. I am converting vinyl to mp3 using a digital recording device (M-Audio Microtrak II). From there, I am moving the files to iTunes. It is possible that this device is encoding as joint stereo but all of the specification read stereo.
I will continue to narrow down the source.
Thanks again!

Iview not selected in the transport package during the export

Hello Expert,
I created a transport package to send the change I made on the iview com.sap.portal.masthead to QA system.
I added correctly the iview to the transport package but when I clicked on the button EXPORT to create the epa file, I found that the iview was not selected.
My change canu2019t be send to QA system.
Any idea how to fix this issue?
Thanks a lot.

Khaled,
You can not transport a standard content as it can overwrite the old version and create a new version of the content.
Refer the below link,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/26/edee3da7138e5be10000000a114084/content.htm
You can copy a the existing iView , change the id and transport the same. Use the changed iView everywhere instead of the standard ones in this case.
Ram

Rounding of Decimal for dependent requirement During MRP Run

Hello Experts,
I have the following scenario:
We are currently enabling Characteristic Based Planning in our system.
Our one component is selected when two characteristic values are met through object dependencies.
Ex: Component A = Char A= '002' and Char B ='002'
Now we have given the following Usage Probability for the two characteristic:
Char A = 20%
Char B = 15%
And the total PIR quantity is 25 Pcs for Configurable Header.
With the above usage probability and PIR Qty, We have a dependent requirement of 0.75 Ea
((20% X 15%) of 25 Pcs) = 3% of 25 Pcs = 0.75 Ea of the component
Now during MRP Run I want to round the dependent Requiremnet to 1 Ea instead of 0.75 Ea.
Any suggestion towards the solution will be appreciated.
Regards,
Vinod

Hi Vivek,
As mentioned we are using Characteristic Based Planning.
The component is selected based on a Selection comdition which is as follows:
Component 721290201000 = $PARENT.BCS_RL_LINE_LOADER = '002' and $PARENT.BCS_RL_WAFER_VENDOR ='002'
When the above two conditions are met the component is selected.
In Characteristic Based Planning we give percentages (Usage Probabality) to the characteristic values like:
$PARENT.BCS_RL_LINE_LOADER/'002' =20%
$PARENT.BCS_RL_WAFER_VENDOR/'002'= 30%
For the Parent which is a KMAT Material we maintain the PIR say 40 Qty.
Now the component qty is calculated as follows:
721290201000 =(20% X 30%) of 40 Qty of parent
721290201000 =(6%) of 40 Qty of parent
721290201000 = 2.4 Qty of component is the dependent req.
Now my requirent is to round the dependent requirenment to 3 during MRP Run. Please note that the purchase requisition got from the above dependent requirement is rounded to 3 qty.
Now I want to round the dependent requirement.
Regards,
Vinod

Consideration of stock of discontinued FG or trading material during MRP Run

There is an functionality of follow up material for component. I would like to know if there is any similar option available for finished goods or trading materials.
I am doing procurement planning for externally procured Trading materials. Now my previous material A is being replaced by material B. Therefore all the planned independent requirement is available in system only for B. But still there is some stock available for material A. How can it be considered during MRP run for material B.
Example,
Material A:
On Hand Stock = 100
Planned Independent Req. = 0
Material B:
On Hand Stock = 300
Planned Independent Req. = 1000
In this case if we run MRP for material B, how we ask system to plan Purchase Requisitions for 600 instead of 700 for material B, considering stock of material A.

Hello
Please refer to the following SAP note:
43636 - Discontinued parts
This note provides a detailed explanation of the system standard design of the usage of discontinued parts with material requiremenst planning and the most common questions about this issue.
The following information is provided on this note regarding the PIRs:
2. Planned independent requirements and forecast requirements are not redirected.
Explanation: Planned independent requirements after the effective-out date are not redirected but are provided with an exception message in the MRP list stating that they cannot be included in the availability check. Planned independent requirements and forecast requirements are therefore displayed in the MRP list and in the stock/requirements list. However, they do not influence planning
BR
Caetano

Storage location consideration during MRP Run

Hi All,
Within a company code, i am having 2 plants namely PS12 & PS13. In plant PS12, i am three storage locations namely 1201, 1202,1203. Similarly in plant PS13, i am having stores 1301,1302,1303.
During MRP run, i do not want to consider the stock in all the storage locations of PS12. The storage location 1203 to be exclued during MRP run. How to set this?
Your input will be appreciated very much,
Thanks
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
Goto SPRO>Production>Planning>Define Storage Location MRP per plant, add the storage location to be ignored during MRP and select indicator '1' against it. Thereafter, all the materials created with this storage location will be defaulted with value '1' in the field 'SLoc MRP indicator'. However this can be modified later if required.
For existing materials, select indicator '1' in the field 'SLoc MRP indicator' avaialble in MRP view under the column 'Storage location MRP'. Go for a mass update for a huge list of materials.
Check this and revert for any clarifications.
Regards,
Murali

Consignment PIR not selected on PR during MRP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for