Consmption to asset without storage location

Dear all,
I have created a Intercompany PO with accoutn assignment? When i see at the good receipt done- its without the storage location.
So the problem is now i want to do the consupmtion for asset using 241 moveemnt type. But this movement doesnt work as it requires a storage location and i am stuck. Please can somebody help. thanks to all.
Cheers
Jasmeet

I have created a Intercompany PO with accoutn assignment? When i see at the good receipt done- its without the storage location.
You already goods receipted with account assignment.So it is alredy consumed against account assignment.
So the problem is now i want to do the consupmtion for asset using 241 moveemnt type. But this movement doesnt work as it requires a storage location and i am stuck. Please can somebody help. thanks to all.
You can not use consumed material again with 241 mvt type.You need to choose materials which are in stock and it will allows you post
Edited by: Sridhar Jayavarapu on Feb 9, 2010 5:09 PM

Similar Messages

Picking without Storage Location

Hi,
Right now we are able to put a pick quantity to the delivery, even without Storage Location, in Picking Tab.
Why is this possible? Can we put a control to prevent the user from input of pick quantity if there is no Storage Location?

Hi,
Thru Incompletion Procedure ,you can make a storage location as required field.While they are going to create delivery if they miss to maintain storage location then system will show this field in incompletion log.
Let me know if you need any further help on this.
Thanks,
Naren

Asset PO Storage location

Hi All,
we have created a Asset PO with meterial code.
Material Type for Material is FHMI (Tools). & At Plant level price & quanlity updated is avilabe for this metarial type.
Now i am not able to enter Storage location while doing G.R.
what setting we have to do for this.
or any checks required for this.
Regards
Pavan

hi
we cant enter storage loc for asset PO as the material wil go for direct consumption agianst thet ASSET no
regards
kunal

MRP run without one storage location

Dear All,
My client's requirement is they need to run MRP on plant level without considering one storage location stock
e.g if a material is having stock of 10 in unrestricted with storage location 1104. Now when mrp is run for 100 quantity planned order is created for 90 only planning strategy is 40....they want the MRP should not consider the stock in storage location 1104.....how this can be made possibe?
Please Suggest...
Regards,
Pawan Shetty

Dear all,
Pl. help me which user exit implemented for MRP RUN without Storage location ,b'coz. from slandered setting we are not able to do the same
Regards
Sandeep

Automatically creation of storage location for material, in MF60

Hi all,
my collegue of PP module uses MF60 transaction.
When he puts XXXX as Replenishment storage location, the system tells him this error: To stge loc. XXXX does not exist for material M1010000182 in plant 0001.
In MM i have activate the automatic creation of storage location for plant 0001 and for all movement types.
Why MF60 does not respect this requirement?
If I try to do movement type 311 with MIGO, manually, there's no problem to transfer the material from a storage location to , XXXX s.loc.
Is there something more that I have to do?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards
Alba

Thanks a lot...
the note says:
Summary
Symptom
A material without storage location view exists.
If within a single material document, this material is moved in such a way that no change in stock occurs in total, the system does not create a storage location automatically even if this is set in Customizing.
Additional key words
OMC3, XLAUT
Cause and prerequisites
All postings to a segment (for example, material, plant, storage location) are only executed if a change in stock occurs. Only in this case, storage locations are created automatically. This way it is made sure that no empty segments are created.
Solution
The system behaves correctly.
Header Data
Release Status:
Released on: 07.07.2000 22:00:00
BUT why IF i do 311 in MIGO, system creates automatically storage location (also if no change in stock occurs in total).
AND if doMF60 (that does mouvement 311), system does not create automatically the storage location?
Best regards
Alba

Storage Location required entry in Material Master

Hi
My client requirement is, at the time of creation of Material Master, System will ask for Storage Location.Without Storage Location, Icann't create Material Master.
Even if I'll select Plant and Storage LOcation View & Warehouse View, System is not asking the storage Location.
Can anybody suggest me where I'll set the setting so that system will ask for Storage Location mandatory in Material Master.
Thanks & regards
PKB

Hi Raja,
Thanks for your reply.Before Posting the thread, I've already checked these Views what you told.But system is not asking me to enter storage location.
You can check in your system.
System only asking for plant not storage location.Even if we select warehouse view, system is not asking for Storage Location view.
Thanks & Regards
PKB

Storage Location is not popullating in the PO(for stock materials)

Hi All,
we are facing a issue regarding the Storage location in SRM 5.0.(patching SAPKIBKT14) when we try to create a PO with Stock material then the PO will be created but without Storage location.But during the confirmation it will give error saying "Enter Stor. Location ".
if we enter the storage location manually it will work fine , but we need it should take automatically like other materials.Note:There is not problem if we do SC .. it will populate automatically.
Please help us.
Regards
Channappa Sajjanar

Hello Channappa,
Please maintain storage location in field "Storage loc. for EP" in MRP2 view via transaction code MM02. Once this is maintained the storage location here, it will automatically populate in the purchase order.
Hope this helps.
Thanks & Regards,
Sunil Katyare

BAPI or FM to Update storage location in outbound delivery with many items

Hello!
I have an urgent problem.
Storage location determination didn't work and were created thousands of deliveries without storage location.
We want to run LSMW using BAPI.
Which BAPI can update storage location (for many items in delivery. We saw an option to update the first item' but not all of them)
PLZ try to help
thank You

Hi,
check this FM:
RV_DELIVERY_PICK_UPDATE
SD_DELIVERY_UPDATE_PICKING

Reg.Storage location make mandatory

Dear Expert
During the Purchase requisition creation the PR is saved without storage location, we want to make it error, how to make it. Pls help me.
Storage location is must to us. how to configure it.
thanks in advance
Rajakumar.K

Dear Experts
how to make the storage location as mandatory, don't have to go to screen layout ->basic data, because plant has set to mandatory
without tick in basic data mandatory field,like that we we to make it. Please help me.
Thanks in advance
Rajakumar.K

System asking for storage location in case of Asset GR,

dear all,
In our case system is asking for Storage Location in case of Asset GR, though PO was account assigned.
I checked for the screen setting, but not getting any clue where to find that entry to make depressed.
Pls guide,
Regards.

Hi,
Are u using material code for assets or its a text based purchase, if material code is there (although non valuated / qty managed) it will still require sloc as system needs to store the qty in stock
Reg
dheeraj

Stock transfer between plants without STO and storage locations

Hi.
In case of stock transfer betwen storage locations with one step it is possible to do stock transfer between different stock types. But in Two step it is only possible to do stock transfer from unrestricted to unrestricted.
In case of Stock transfer between Plants without STO in one and two step stock transfer, it is possible to do stock transfer from unrestricted to unrestricted.
Is there any reason for this?

Hi
Thanks for your reply. But i could not understand the sentence - But this is not possibles with 2 step procedure. becasue 2 step is recored will be maintained . In 2 step it not possible. Can you please eloborate on this
Regards,
Vivek Swarnapuri

GR done without mention the Storage location

PO created and released without detremine the stroge location , then the GR for this PO is posted without detremine the storage location also my question is
1- where is the stock now it is hidden
2- how can i return the stock to certain storage location
regards,

>
wello76 wrote:
> thank you for your quick answar
>
> i have one more question
>
> is it any way to assgin the storage location while making the GR or the only way is to mention the storage location at the PO itself before make the GR
>
> Regads,
Well if the PO is account assigned then you cann't maintain any storage location (please check your PO whether it is account assigned)
Now if it is not account assigned i.e. normal PO then if you don't fill the storage location in the PO then in MIGO at where tab the storage location field will remain blank & you have to maintain the same in MIGO...otherwise if you maintain the storage location in PO then there is no need to maintain it again in MIGO (as it will be prefilled from PO)....you can check the stock in that scenario in MB51 also
Regards,
Indranil

Storage Location Naming Convention without WM!

Dear all
We are facing serious problem in our Storage Location for Raw Material.
We have 4 types of Raw Material Seating (S), Panel (P), Metal (M), Wood (W). And they are all stored under Storage Location: RWSL.
Requirement:
Although we have visual guideline as to which industrial rack will store the type of Material, it is insufficient. We need a more refined storage location down to which BIN of the rack we will put the Raw Material.
Due to limited time and resource, we cannot have WM implemented right now. Thus, we have come out with 2 alternative to overcome this problem:
Alternative 01:
We will use the Fixed Bin field in Storage Data 02 by putting the Bin number assigned to each Rack.
E.g. For Seating material code:SEAT01, we will maintain the Fixed Bin as R12A01/A02, it means this Seating material SEAT01 will be stored at Rack 12, fixed bin A01 or A02.
Question to Alternative 01: Will it cause problem in GR, GR, Transfer Posting and Stock Count?
Alternative 02:
Instead of going into details to put Fixed Bin field in Storage Data 2, we will abandan the existing Storage Location RMSL by introducing new format for Storage Location
Here is the example of Alternative 02:
For raw materials, we will use 4 digits location numbers, consistent with other Storage locations, the 4 digits storage location will start with u201CR _ _ _u201D to represent each location
And,
R _ _ _ is:
R = Raw materials
2nd digit = Division (S= Seating, P =Panel, W=Wood, M=Metal and W=Wood)
3rd digit = Rack Number (A, B, C, Du2026 and etc.)
4th digit = Rack Zone - each rack will broken down into zone, each rack can possibility have 2 to 3 zone. 1 Zone can be 1 colume of the Rack
An example of a possible location and its meaning will be
RSA1 = Raw materials warehouse, Seating division, Rack A, Zone 1
RPB3 = Raw materials warehouse, Panel Division, Rack B, Zone 3
The challenge of this is that instead of having 1 Raw Material Storage Location like RMSL, we will have a lot more storage locations each for division of Raw material due to the Rack Number we have as well as the Rack Zone.
Question to Alternative 02:
If we use this alternative, will it impact our future implementation of WM? From design wise, is it feasible?
Please advise what is the best approach and the feasible design on it.
Many thanks in advance.
Edited by: Daimos on May 13, 2009 10:15 AM

Hi, here is the Pro and Co of both approaches:
Method 01: Use existing SLOC and add the Storage Bin info
e.g. SLOC: STM1
         Storage Bin: RSC3, where RS = Rack Seating, C3 = column 3
Pro 01:
It will cause less effort as we only need to use LSMW for material master to add in the Storage Bin data for all material of SCM.
Pro 02:
I have tested out that in TCode MIGO, apart from SLOC, the pertaining Storage Bin data also appear. Based on my discuss with Xian Chen, sometimes they use MB1C(GR), MB1A(GI) rather than MIGO due to speed issue, I will need to check the field status if can have Storage Bin field APPEAR, if can, it will solve the problem
Con 01:
The Storage Bin information will only appear in MMBE (Stock Overview) but will not appear in the standard SAP Inventory Report (e.g. MB52 Warehouse Stock). To view it from SAP Inventory Report, we may need to customize the standard report to show the new field Storage Bin. It needs Abap effort.
Con 02:
We must have a very good naming convention for Storage Bin. And again, in the above example, if a material is put in SLOC STM1 at Storage Bin RA A1 or C4, it will set a very rigid rule in the future if we need to change it, as I fear that one the Storage Bin has been used up. It will not allow us to change (need to do testing to find out)
Con 03:
Do we have the time to define all the Storage Bin for each SLOC? Operation wise, the store personnel needs to design it
Method 02: Use the new SLOC
Pro 01:
RSA1 = Raw materials warehouse, Seating division, Rack A, Zone 1. More organized. Easy to tell the material is at which Rack and which Zone of the Rack.
Assumption:
01. we must not have too many rack for one Seating division and also not too many Zone for each
      Division, else it will cause confusion
02. 1 material should stick to 1 Rack 1 zone as much as possible, else later the PP consultant will
     have hard to to perform GI due to too many SLOC assigned to a material.
Pro 02:
In report wise, we are able to show the SLOC in inventory report. No need to enhance the existing inventory report as we do not use Storage Bin.
Con 01:
If there are too many SLOC creation due to it. It may cause problem for PP perform GI as too many selection available for a material. This can be avoided if stick to the General Rule that one material is tied with one SLOC.
Edited by: Daimos on May 16, 2009 5:07 AM

Inspected stock posting to multiple storage location without batch

Hi,
At the time of Usage Decision, I want to post the inspected stock to multiple storage location i.e., Rejected Stock to Scrap Storage Location, Qualified Stock to Unrestricted Use Storage Location.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Anandkumar KS

The scrap line has no storage location since that stock is typically written off and scrap cost center is defined in configuration.
A possible alternative is to set up VMENGE08 and VMENGE09 with the same material movements you want to use. You obviously aren't using the 553 movement type as that writes off the material. That could give you two lines to use for your scraping. I can't remember if these stock posting lines give you the storage location option or not and I don't have a sandbox available to test today. If you need to post more then two grades in one inspection lot, you'll have to do the first two postings, save the UD, then come back in and do a second posting for the next two grades.
Read the configuration help file you'll find in confg for "Define Inventory Postings" under the QM config.
You can also change the displayed names of the stock posting lines. That's explained in the config file as well.
Craig

Add restriction in CO11N for storage location without doing goods movement

Hi experts,
my requirement was to restrict user for some storage location in CO11N, though i completed it using badi "WORKORDER-GOODSMVT" there is some issue.
Some user just confirm the order in the front page only they are not going in for goods movement tab. Thats why the order get saved for the restricted storege location also.
I try to use badi "WORKORDER_CONFIRM" but it is not showing the line details.
is there any way to restrict the storage location in the front page only or make goods movement tab compulsary.
Please Help
Thanks
Rahul

Hi,
I managed to do it with 'WORKORDER GOODSMVT" method BACKFLUSH.
Now it is showing the proper error message at the front screen.
BUT WHEN I PRESS ENTER IT IS GIVING ERROR ' EXCEPTION CONDITION DUPREC RAISED".
Please HELP
Thanks
Rahul

Consmption to asset without storage location

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for