Consolidate posting across contracts

Hello
We have one master contract and under that we have numerous addendum contracts. We want that while running RERAPP, system should post one accounting document per master contract i.e. customer should be debited only once with reference to master contract number.
We tried to use standard BADi but it does not give us enough space/ opportunity/ flexibility to achieve this.
Since number of addendum contracts under main contracts are as huge as 1000 in number, client is not interested in posting 1000 accounting documents. Nor do our customer (tenant) would like to see these items in customer statement.
Though I did show to client RERAINV whereby we can club multiple documents into single invoice per BP but their requirement is to have one customer line item per master contract.
Please advise
Rakesh

Dear Rakesh Sharma.
I also have a experience such as client requirement. (By using Master Contract Number)
As you already know, Originally, RE Posting Document process by each contract number.
So, each posted debit line has a contract number filed or applied to assignment field
on the financial document.
In your ceases, One customer(Based on the master contract number) have multiple contract,
you can consider 2-options as below ;
1) You can define the Invoicing Process, Even if the financial document created by each contract
    number, you can summarize this line item on the rent invoicing by using t-code
     "RERAIV - Create Rent Invoices to Tenants".
    and, On the processing of Tax Invoice, you can communicate with Financial Module for
    summarizing the tax invoicing of each customer line(based on the debit line).
    - Individual or Aggregated Tax Invoicing Process
2) If you want to directly summarize the multiple line item of multiple contract number, you can      
   customize by using the Enhancements BADI such as below.
   (but this is not recommended method)
    - BADI_RERA_DOC_SPLIT : (You can define the criteria for "Posting Document Splitting".)
    - BADI_REEX_FI_BAPI : (Changes Document Data Before Call of FI BAPI)
Thank you.
Regards,
Jeong, Yeong Chul.

Similar Messages

  • Direct Posting to Contracts and Business roles in SRM

    Hi guys,
    We have SRM 7 and ECC 6.0.
    Please consider the following business scenario:
    Invoice creation in SRM against ERP contract that has been previously replicated to SRM;
    No PO or GR involved in this process;
    Possibility to have one contract to vendor A, and the corresponding invoices for different vendors.
    Considering this we thought about the following solution:
    Activate Direct Posting to Contracts functionality in ERP;
    Contract, supplier and materials / services replication to SRM, through PI;
    Allow different partners in the contract, using partner role “Invoicing party” (RS), so that it would be possible to post an invoice to vendor B, with reference to a contract with vendor A.
    Questions:
    Reporting – as far as I know it’s only possible to run analyses for vendors, which in our case would be vendor A, assigned to the contract.  However, we will need to have information about the invoices posted to the other business partners that are assigned to that contract. Do you have any idea if there is any standard approach for this?
    Contract and business roles replication to SRM – does the contract and the assigned business roles could be replicated to SRM or is it required any specific customizing in SRM for this to be possible?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    AN

    Hi,
    For direct posting to G/L in  MIRO, follow the path:
    SPRO > Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice > Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts > Here Activate "Dir.posting to G/L acct = active" and save.
    MIRO - It will show additional Tab as "GL Account" along with "Reference"
    For more check the links:
    http://www.saptechies.com/transaction-mr1m-direct-posting-to-gl-account/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/17887583/MM-FI-Account-Determination
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Posting across GAAPs error in GR

    Dear Gurus:
    Trying to make a goods receipt (MIGO 101) I got the error: "Posting across GAAPs are not permitted". which would be the causes?
    Thank you!!!
    JFS

    Hi,
    NOOOOO.
    Why would you recommend configuring a stochastic block?
    What has that got to do with anything?
    A stochastic block will block random invoices above a certain threshhold. Why would you recommend someone setting up a function that is purely and completely optional. How can you think that setting this would have anything to do with posting a goods receipt.
    Please just ensure that the company code and plant involved have been set up correctly. This will solve the problem.
    You could try the "copy, create and check" function for the company code and plant to run a check to see if there are missing config entries.
    Steve B

  • Posting across Company Codes

    Can someone please suggest the most efficient of posting Customer and Vendor transactions across different company codes.
    We are beginning to receive customer payments into a bank account and company code (DP01) that is different from the Customer's original company code transaction (HA01).  Similarly, we are making payments to vendors in DP01 whose original invoice has been entered into HA01.
    There are already intercompany reconcilation accounts between the various company codes, but, I am after the most efficient way of posting for example, Debit bank clearing in DP01, Credit Customer in HA01, and, credit Bank clearing in DP01, debit Vendor account in HA01.
    Thanks and regards,
    RB

    I believe the best way to handle inter-company cash management type transaction through the standard SAP FI inter-company posting of AR and AP balances. I would recommend to use G/L account as inter-company receivables and payables account.Also, you probably don't want manual transaction to those inter-company receivables and payables. Now, it probably will be outside the scope of a forum post to detail everything about it. At least you have some clues here.

  • Direct posting to contracts - any side effects?

    Hello all,
    Activating this funtionality will allow us to bill directly from contracts, however this functionality will just be helpfull in specific cases. In the major cases, the billing will be processed 'normally', with reference to PO.
    The question is, will what we considerer as normal billing process somehow be affected by the activation of this functionality?
    Thanks in advance,
    Greetings.

    Hi Hakiza
    I would recommend you to create a vendor/customer for the company which has bought your subsidiary and  instead of posting directly to the recon account , make posting to this vendor/customer,
    Regards
    Sachin

  • I have 5 devices (4 of which are smart phones) on 3 contracts (same account).  Is there any way to consolidate (IE Combine Contracts)?

    I have 3 different "contracts" with Verizon, all under the same account.
    Contract 1 - 2 Samsung Galaxy S3's
    Contract 2 - 2 Samsung Galaxy S3's
    Contract 3 - Voice / Text Only Device (Samsung Trace?)
    Is it possible to roll all 5 of these devices into a single contract?

    The More Everything plans are usually better especially if you ave 3 or more smartphones.My bill is totally over $300 as well. I share it with my 2 brothers and one of my sisters. This makes what we pay less than if we were all on our own. You would have lost your unlimited data when you upgraded but the ME plan is goo for those families where one device uses more data than another. With individual data plans at $30 each for 2gb your bill would have been roughy the same and you can't transfer unused data from one line to another. This could result in overage charges.  The biggest downside to the ME plan is your basic phone being 30 a month. Who uses that phone? I ask because there may be other options.

  • Posting Across Controlling Areas

    Hi,
    We have 3 Controlling Areas for 3 geographical regions. US, EU and APAC. However, now we want to move the valuated stock items from one plant in the US region to another plant in EU region. Obviously we do have some cost associated with these materails and also, some transportation costs as well. Do we know how we can get this sorted out in SAP please. SAP OSS note clearly says that the cross-controlling area posting in SAP is not supported.
    Any inputs please, always appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Subash Krishna

    Hi,
    I am not sure what you meant by that. I have 4 controlling areas linked to the same operating concern. The movement of valuated materials with their transport charges is between regions (Each region has separate controlling area). Somewhere on one OSS note we read that SAP does not support cross-controlling area posting as it is against the normal design of the SAP system. Are you saying that the derivation in CO-PA would help to get over this limitation?
    Please could you throw some more light on this issue?
    Thank you,
    Subash Krishna

  • Periodic posting contracts - do postings just for certain business partner

    Hello,
    with the program RFRERAPP the periodical posting for contracts is done.
    Based on the selection parameter you can select the contracts, but the posting run is always done for the whole contract.
    Here we have the requirement that they just would like to do the postings for certain business partners, as they want to run the postings per business partner each month.
    That of course include the situation that they have conditions assigned to different business partner on one contract.
    Within the BADI BADI_RERA_DOC - BEFORE_POST you have the possibility to change the posting data. The posting data are hand over in the table CT_ITEM.
    I did delete those postings in the table which are not desired. But this results in an error messgae within the output of the RFRERAPP program.
    Message:
    RE-Document without posting data
    Message: RERACA011
    Does anybody have an idea whether it is possible to skip certain postings during the period posting run via RFRERAPP ?
    Perhaps it is necessary to divide the whole posting process in seperate steps and write a complete new posting program.
    OR
    Is it really the right way to handle this request ?
    Do you see any other functional chance to deal with this customer request ?
    Best regards
    Michael

    Hi Michael,
    I'm afraid the BADI BADI_RERA_DOC is not suitable for your requirement. This BAdI is not thought for this purpose.
    With Ehp4 there is an additional select option available for RERAPP for the condition type. So I guess this will also not meet your requirement.
    You may either create a customer specific program for posting or do a modification of RERAPP . Modification of RERAPP is not that easy because you have to insert the select option and then pass it through the program calls to the method where the cash flow is read.
    And please be aware that modication issues are not handled by SAP support.
    Regards, Franz

  • Forward contract post Fair Value

    Dear Expert,
    I try to find the solution about how to post Forward contract at Fair value (monthly) but I cannot. So I need more help, if someone know about this please inform back to me.
    Waiting for help.
    Thanks so much ^^

    Hi,
    By default it would have picked up exchange rate type M only.  Check the position management procedure assigned for you contract in TPM26 and in config check for the step used for valuation for this position management procedure.  Under key date valuation for this step, check the exchange rate type used.  You might as well want to change it to ENDP.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Posting Ovi Store Reviews = Nokia Account TERMINAT...

    Here's the short version of my story, which is directly summarized in the subject above (and yes, my account is being terminated against my will).
    1.  create nokia account, use it to sign in to Ovi Store
    2.  post reviews for applications
    3.  have at least 6 of your reviews flagged with the "report issue" link
    4.  recieve notification that your account is terminated.
    Q: "Why did you post so many reviews that were flagged using 'report issue'"? 
    A:  My reviews were non-abusive.  One such 'removed' review simply stated that 'Compass Touch' was a nice application and 'did what it said on the tin'.  
    Q:  "Why not alert Nokia that reviews were being removed unjustly early in the process and avoid this final terminal fate"?
    A:  I tried.  review removal notifications are sent via email, from the address [email protected].  Replying to this address resulted in email delivery failure notices: the account is dead and undeliverable.
    Q:  "So why not contact Nokia Customer Care directly"?
    A:  I did.  After a multitude of emails I gave up: they are idiots.  I never got them to understand that my issue was with REVIEWS being removed rather than APPLICATIONS being removed.  The email chain has some of the most expressive and distressed language I have ever written.
    Q:  "Wait, so the account is closed.  What does that mean"?
    A:  It means that I cannot buy more apps from the Ovi Store.  In 3 months I spent $75 at the Ovi Store and now that revenue stream is cut off by Nokia themselves.  All applications I have purchased are now irreversibly detached from association with any Nokia Account and I cannot re-register for an account with my username OR my email address for 6 months.
    Q:  "Big deal, 6 months, so what"?
    A:  Well, it is a big deal. Now I will almost certainly not buy anything ever again directly from the Ovi Store (loss of revenues to Nokia).  If I do, I certainly won't post reviews of any apps (loss of quality control and PR for Nokia).  Also note that I am developing 3 applications for S60v5 at the moment - and I am seriously finding it difficult to see a future for these applications on the Ovi Store.
    Q:  "Who cares if you don't post reviews anymore, your reviews were abusive"
    A:  No, they weren't.  I can't stress that enough.  My reviews were far from abusive and most of the reviews that were flagged were short, accurate and POSITIVE reviews.  Moreover, as a user I was PENALIZED for posting MEANINGFUL REVIEWS.  We've all seen the gobs and gobs of **bleep** reviews on the Ovi Store, right?  The poor language, the obvious and crude Nokia bashing, the iPhone fanboy posts?  If legitimate users with meaningful things to say are penalized for posting proper reviews, all we will have left are those **bleep** reviews that never belonged there in the first place.
    Q:  "Wait, what apps are you developing anyway"?
    A:  They aren't ready for public consumption, but will be released under the GPL when I am done.  'Bibliotouch' will be a free ebook reader with automatic bookmarking and social reviews that ties into the Gutenburg Project for free Public Domain books.  'NighPhone WebApps' will be an 'appstore' of sorts, providing an interface to search, test, and install widgets to launch iPhone WebApps on your Nokia device - complete with social reviews and 2 levels of installations (local bookmarks and local widget generation/installation).  Finally 'NagNagNag' will be a Location Based Service that watches where you spend your time and allows for location based time budgeting, allowing you to setup alarms such as [nag me if i work more than 50 hours a week] or [nag me if i don't visit family at least once a season].
    Q:  "Hey those are good ideas for apps, can I steal the ideas and make them myself"?
    A:  Sure.  Go for it.  I'm still gonna write them myself too, and release them as open source projects, so do whatever you want to.  Just be forewarned that Ovi Store might be a horrible horrible horrible place to distribute them.
    -bit 
    N95-1 ---> N97-NAM ---> N900 ---> E7-00 + N900 (I use them both)
    (N95 was pretty good, N97 had potential but utterly failed to deliver, N900 is absurdly good. Those of you wondering, "should I try N900/Maemo/MeeGo"? The answer is a resounding YES)

    ravidavi wrote:
    While I do feel bad for the author, after reading the initial post one big question stuck out in my mind: "Why on earth are you paying money to the Ovi Store?"
    The store has been around for months, and there have been literally HUNDREDS of posts across the internet about people losing money.  In addition, the customer service is abysmal and lawsuit-worthy,
    [...snip...]
    Again, while I do feel that you were booted out unfairly, bitflung you should look at this as an opportunity.  At least you got out after only being $75 in the hole.
    The Ovi store is like a Casino.  The house always wins, and the customer should go in expecting to lose everything they went in with.
    Ravi
    fair enough.  of course, if the store would ever be anything other than a money trap it would require early adopters.  that's me.  i still drive the first hybrid available in the USA (predates the prius, btw - Honda Insight).  still own an original N95-1 (though i will sell it once my N97 gets voip support). etc etc etc.
    I guess what i'm saying is, though lots of people have had issues i was still game for using the ovi store.  if i had an issue with purchasing a single app and ended up loosing $1.99, i'd be aggravated.  instead, i'm blown away: my whole account has been terminated.  that's a whole different breed of broken.  as an early adopter, this is the first time i feel truly stung by the flaws of a service provider.  even my N95-1, with all of its problems, remains as functional today as it was last year.  ovi store?  not so much.  it's like having my N95-1 suddenly disappear, or better yet like the N95-1 suddenly started rejecting my SIM card saying, "all those calls to your family look like prank calls to me, so i've terminated your mobile contract with AT&T".
    anyway - surly i won't be spending any money at the ovi store again for quite some time (seems i can't even create a new account now because my mobile # is attached to the terminated account still).
    -bit 
    N95-1 ---> N97-NAM ---> N900 ---> E7-00 + N900 (I use them both)
    (N95 was pretty good, N97 had potential but utterly failed to deliver, N900 is absurdly good. Those of you wondering, "should I try N900/Maemo/MeeGo"? The answer is a resounding YES)

  • ERP invoice with reference to SRM Basic Contract?

    Hi
    In SAP SRM you can create a shopping cart or a PO with reference to a SRM Basic Contract by setting the item number to 0 like: 4700000107/0
    But with the new Ehp1 SAP states that ERP invoices can be created with reference to a SRM central contract (via SRM_SERVICE_PROC_1). But can you create the invoice with reference to contract item 0?
    The idea is to have the non PO related invoices registrered on the basic contract in SRM along with the PO's. A basic contract can't be copied to ERP, as there is no lines on it, but is the ERP contract copy needed for this scenario?
    So two questions:
    - is the ERP contract copy from SRM needed to use the Ehp1 functionality of creating invoices with reference to a SRM contract?
    - can the ERP invoice be created with reference to a basic SRM contract by giving the contract item as 0 or in another way?
    BR
    Jacob

    Hello,
    With SRM 70 EHP1 you can create ERP invoice against your SRM Central Contract distributed to ERP.
    To enable this you need to do few settings in ERP, for the same you can refer to the config guides available at Service market place for SRM701 releases.
    Configuring Contract Handling for Invoices : You use this procedure to configure contract handling for invoices in the SAP ERP system. You have activated the Procurement - SRM Integration 2 (LOG_MM_P2PSE_2) business function in the SAP ERP system.
    Steps :
    1. In Customizing for SAP ERP, perform the activity under :  Materials Management -- Logistics Invoice Verification -- Incoming Invoice -- Activate Direct Posting to Contracts , to allow direct references to contracts when creating invoices and parking documents.
    2. In Customizing for SAP ERP, perform the activity under : Materials Management -- Logistics Invoice Verification -- Invoice Block -- Set Tolerance Limits , to set the tolerance key for contracts (PC: Price variance for contract).
    The feature is termed as Invoice Reconciliation here.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • Set up Company Codes for Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable

    HI,
    I need clarification on "Set up Company Codes for Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable"
    When a company code "ABCD" isn't set up for contract accounts receivable and payable (Menu path:
    SAP Insurance -> Collections/Disbursements -> Organizational Units -> Set up Company Codes for Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable), are postings on this company code "ABCD" within FS-CD not allowed and blocked ?
    Is it mandetory to specify company codes to post in Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable in SAP FS-CD.

    Yes .  It is mandatory to extend company code chart of accounts to CA/CR and FSCD.
    Srinivas

  • Benefits of implementing Central Contracts in SRM 7.

    Dear Experts,
    Picture the following:
    - Classic Scenario.
    - One ECC 6 EHP 4 Back end.
    I'm currently exploring the benefits of implementing Central Contracts against using only Purchasing Contracts in ECC and replicating them to SRM for use in the Shopping Carts.
    So my question is why would you implement central contracts in SRM instead of just replicating these contracts from ECC? What benefits would you get out of having central contracts in place against having only Purchasing Contracts in ECC?
    Thanks for your input.

    adding to Manju one point .
    - Procurement department(PURCHASER) can use web interface to create / manage contracts rather GUI interface and quick contract creation / maintenance
    - Approval mechanism simplified with less efforts.
    - Different ways to create a contract from SRM
       Copy an existing contract
    Use an existing template
    Upload an external file
    Upload a contract from the catalog
    Muthuraman
    1.You can use this business process to access SAP SRM contract features, such as contract hierarchies, discount across contract hierarchies, and grouping logic, when determining source of supply in SAP ERP.
    2.You can create a central contract in SAP SRM, and it can then be used as source of supply in both SAP SRM and SAP ERP. Relevant data is sent to SAP ERP for a source of supply determination, and a specific type of contract or scheduling agreement can be created there.
    3.While determining a source of supply, you can access central contracts directly.
    4.The price is determined in SAP SRM before the SAP ERP purchase order (PO) is sent to the supplier.
    5.You can create and change central contracts and renegotiate existing contracts directly with a supplier, or through the creation of an RFx. You can automatically assign a contract as a source of supply, or it can be listed as one of numerous potential source of supply contracts. A strategic purchaser can create a contract whenever they anticipate a long-term relationship with a supplier.
    6.Contract management enables purchasers from various parts of the company at different locations to take advantage of the terms of globally-negotiated contracts for specific product categories. You can provide users with specific levels of authorization to contracts, and you can categorize documents as confidential.
    6.You can distribute central contracts to release-authorized purchasing organizations, and these organizations can then use them as source of supply in the appropriate SAP ERP system. Hierarchies can be used to organize, structure, display, and search for contracts.
    7.If you use SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence (SAP BI), you can view various consolidated reports of contract management. For example, you can view aggregated value released against all contracts in a contract hierarchy.

  • Duplicate Posts

    Occasionally, we see forum users posting duplicate posts across various sub-categories within a category. While not always helpful, this occasionally helps garner inputs from users who would not frequent the original category where the user has already posted his query once. In this sense, I believe that this practice may not always deserve to be frowned upon as the intention may be to have inputs from other set of members.
    Having said that, may I suggest an enhancement to the forum (if the underlying technology permits) that would allow a user to swap the sub-category under which his query is posted ? This would allow a user to attempt "moving" his/her post between sub-categories preventing duplicate posts while at the same time providing an option to focus the query to different set of users ?
    Would like to have the views of peers and moderators here.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    This becomes impractical quickly.
    What if you can't/don't want to get to the other forum? (Consider that there are sites that are shunned, to the point where people don't want links to raise their google standing. Others are obscure.)
    What if you are responding to something before they link to the other forum? The Ranch post was explicit about a delay.
    What if some forums don't allow editing?
    What about people who blast doc questions to every forum they can or can't spell?
    What if some fora have different etiquette? (I remember one day I posted in similar style different questions, one on usenet and one on C$erve. One group flamed me for too little info, the other for too long of a post. Similar things have happened between usenet, lists and fora. And top versus bottom posting...)
    Eventually someone says something like "well, use good judgment and post smart questions" which is useless on this topic. The root cause intra-site is arbitrary classifications, and cross-site the capriciousness of the rules.
    We shouldn't expect questioners to put in more time than volunteers, there is quite of bit of management implicit in cross-indexing crossposting. People will just get cross :P

  • Under what condition does SAP populate the Contract number during dunning

    Hi,
    Would anyone possibly know under what condition SAP populates the Contract number in the Dunning history transaction(FPM3). We have seen some examples in our production environment where dunning populated the Contract number(VTREF) in the dunning history header table FKKMAKO but there are other examples where the VTREF is blank in FKKMAKO.
    Thanks,
    Tarunavo Bhattacharya

    Hi,
    Please check if the contract is populated for the document posted for which the dunning is executed.
    As per my understanding, If the document is posted at contract level, the document would have the contract populated, and the dunning basically is executed at CA level, but if the document is having the contract populated, it should be displayed once the dunning is completed for the dunning history. If the contract field is blank, it wont appear for the dunning history details.
    Hope this helps!!
    Regards,
    Rajesh Popat

Maybe you are looking for

  • WiFi no longer works on iPhone 3GS after 3.1 Update

    Well essentially the subject is all there is too it. I updated to iTunes 9 and iPhone OS 3.1 yesterday. I usually have wifi off at all times unless i want to use it to save battery life. I turned WiFi on and it wouldn't find my router. Any suggestion

  • Adobe Media Encoder Doesn't recognize .prproj files

    I am absolutely losing it here. I have read posts on various forums for hours, not only can I not find a solution, I can't find anyone who has this same problem. I'm running CS4 on a Mac and when I try to export from premiere, Adobe Media Encoder ope

  • How do I add a hyperlink into a pdf document in OS X Mountain Lion?

    It appears that Mountain Lion does not allow you to add links to pdfs docs in preivew. Does anyone know a work around? Why would Apple remove this festure? Thanks, S.

  • Spawning multiple Processes in PL/SQL Block

    Hi All Does anyone know if it is possible within PL/SQL block to 'spawn' multiple versions of a procedure as parallel processes. What I would like to do is something like WHILE x = 'CONTINUE LOOP load process1...load process2..load process3. I could

  • URGENT: RAID5 Configuration on RD120 Server: Scenario A vs. Scenario B

    This particular issue isn't server specific, but I am posting in this forum because it just so happens to be a brand new Lenovo RD120 I am working on. Also, sorry for the urgent status but I have a very small amount of time to find the answer. My iss