Consolidation unit's hierarchy can not be organized well in BCS

Hi,gurus here.
We are using SEM-BCS to analyse business consolidation based on BW.
In BW,the consolidation unit's hierarchy is good,but when we execute the data load task in BCS,the consolidatioin unit in BCS can not be organized as an entire hirarchy well.
What's wrong?

Hi Dan,
Thanks for your answer.
Youu2019re saying that although the data is loaded is ignored in the reporting.
But if data is loaded isnu2019t it considered in the consolidation methods? As in the method for IU IU Elimination and Reconciliation or Consolidation of Investments?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards.

Similar Messages

Base unit of measure can not be changed since EAN is already assigned.

Hi,
We would like to change the UOM from EA to SET .In order to tag MM # as BOM Header and ZCEN (Serial number profile)but the error massage appears as below print screensystem is not allowing to do so ,throwing following error message:
"Base unit of measure can not be changed since EAN is already assigned."
Could you help to resolve the same.
Thanks,
Amit

Hi,
Thats correct you must be getting Error message M3 341 ,
EAN international article number is tied with material number in basic data view with EAN Category and seperate number range
EAN is a standardized unit that uniquely identifies a material relating to a unit of measure or type of packaging.
The International Article Number (EAN) is assigned by the manufacturer of the material. In this case, the EAN identifies the
manufacturer uniquely. A company can assign EANs using "in-store" numbering techniques known only to the company.
If you still want to change UOM you need to first remove the EAN assigned..please explore further if you have internal number range
for EAN or external ..etc
Thanks
Diwakar

Can "notes" be organized alphabetically"

Can notes be organized in alphabetical order ... or do they appear only in the order in which they are created?
Thanks

In order they are created. But then they reorder the most recently used to the top of the list.

Duplicate consolidation unit in hierarchy ( where COI is active) in EC-CS

Hi all
I ve a question regarding duplicating(multiple assignments) existing Consolidation unit in the Hierarchy(tcode:CX1X)
There are several groups where One of the COI Cons Unit is now duplicated ex: 1000 cons Unit
Ex: GROUP1
Cons UNit = 1000
Group4
Cons Unit = 1000
Cons Unit = 2000 - PU
Now we are adding new COns Unit along with CU = 1000 in New Hierarchy
Group6 -
( New Group Created and added new cons units: 2001 -2003)
Cons Unit = 1000 - PU
cons Unit = 2001
Cons Unit = 2002
Cons Unit = 2003
With Above Cons Unit - 1000 Triple in 3 Different Groups.
I did tested COI, Then System Posting 3 Different Documents by Group Level. CAUSE of 3 Group Level
>> The fact is The real COI assignment is at "Group4" >>>
Please Advise, if this is normal or i should take care differently?
Your reply is highly appreciated.
Thx
Ramana

Hi Dan
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I agree with you and also I am expecting same in system behaviour. But system is not proposing Full Transfer instead proposed Partial Div, Increased CAP/Red Cap and Step Acq process. this is what I have acheived in the system.
Exicsting Investor CB A PU reduce 100 % Invest -2000 .00 Ttype 140 TP CU B ( take out 100% share) in CG1
CB D PU Increase 100 % Invest 2000.00 Ttype 140 TP CU B in CG2
still i am not able to move full transfer from old CU A - new CU D with INVESTMENTS.
any thoughts please
thanks in advance
Ramana_12

HGrid hierarchy can not be shown correctly

Hi,
When I implement HGrid in R12, I followed HGrid example. But my result hierarchy is not show correctly.
In my expect hierarchy, it should be 01--02--04 02--03. But in fact, my current result hierrachy is all node seems as each root node shown. A dummy root node is show on top level. Could some one can help to research my case?
I use one custom table, there is item code and parent code in the custom table to be VL. In my VL, source attribute is item code, destination attribute is parent item code, the SQL is generate automatically.
Following is the expect result:
01
--02
----04
--03
Current result is
Root node
--01
----02
------04
----03
--02
----04
--03
--04
Best Regards,
Eileen
Edited by: Eileen on Sep 20, 2009 2:38 AM
Edited by: Eileen on Sep 20, 2009 2:39 AM

Could some one help to look into this?
Many thanks,
Eileen

Can not access my wells farego acct in firefox,can in internet explorer

can not get into my bank with fire fox but can wi9th internet expoorer

Hello Skevy. Welcome to the Apple Discussions!
Try connecting your MacBook Pro directly, using an Ethernet cable, to one of the 802.11n AirPort Extreme Base Station's (AEBSn) LAN ports, and then, try using the AirPort Utility to configure it.

I have an airport extreme base unit and utility can not find it

I have a 5th gen airport extreme router which works just fine with I plug in an ethernet cord to it … however when I want to use anything else (iPad, iPhone) my router is not showing up in any of the airport utility scans … my wife said yesterday it popped up a question and she either accepted it or said yes and since that point it has not shown up at all … on mac, pcs, iPad, iPhones nothing … I've even tried to do a hard factory restart of the base station and it still hasn't worked ... any ideas?

Hi wusid,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities. This article has some steps to try if the Airport Extreme isn't appearing on your iOS devices:
AirPort base station doesn't appear in AirPort Utility 1.3 for iOS
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4601
This article would be for troubleshooting on the Mac:
AirPort base station not seen or "An unexpected error occurred" appears in AirPort Utility 6.3
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4597
Cheers,
- Ari

Can not Delete Data in SEM-BCS

Dear Expert,
I do the following steps :
1. Created Consolidation groups in workbench ( I was not assigned it to anywhere)
2. Save.
3. Deleted Consol group above.
4. WHen i tried to save, There are errors that said "The data model contains inconsistencies. These have to be cleaned up before you proceed." . And then i click button "Full Display" but the result said : "Data is Consistent. SYnchronzation not neccessary".
How do i delete data in workbench? because i cannot delete master data that i created in workbench.
Please advice.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Actually, yes, you may delete master data in BW and then syncronize them with BCS.
The name of the infoobject containing master data for cons group you may see in your data basis, on the tab strip showing roles assignment (swithing on the tech names).
Execute RSA1 t-code. Find in infoobjects, the IO for cons groups, delete its master data.
SE38 t-code, program name = UGMDSYNC. Choose the cons group IO; set source = your BW system name; set target = local. Execute syncronization.
After that the data for cons group in BW and BCS will be equivalent.
Best regards,
Eugene

HT6162 Can not read arabic well on safari with ios7.1

What can i do to read arabic websites on ios7.1

You should have no problem reading such sites. Please provide the url of one you cannot read and explain what is not displaying correctly.

Consolidation Unit Clearing account for Income / Expenses elimination

Hi,
When companys are leaving the group, where the parent comapany has some income/expenses elimination transactions with the company leaving, there is still balance on the parent company on consolidation unit clearing account with the company leaving the group as partener company.
This shows incorrectely the retained earning for the parent company for posting leve20 when balances on consolidation unit clearing account is not included. Please advise.
We are not unsing COI but we are using Group change functionalities when company leaves the grop.
Furthere, in all auto elimination document type for Balance Sheet Elimination and Income statement elimination, we have assigned same consolidation unit clearing account. Please advise.
Best Regards,
UR

When viewing the results using the standard reporting mode I suspect the balances are okay. Please clarify in detail how the data is being analyzed so we may better assist.

I can not update my ipod tuch

i can not update my ipod tuch to new verision

What version do you have? If iTunes is stating that iOS 4.2.1 is up to date, you most likely have a 2nd generation unit. It can not be upgraded beyond iOS 4.2.1.

Reparenting - of equity consolidated units upward in hierarchy

Hi experts,
We're doing reparenting of a cons unit (upward in a hierarchy) : The scenario is explained as under:
There are two hierarchies in a single version. The consolidation units falling under both hierarchies are same. Difference being - H1 is a flat hierarchy with parent A and all other as subsidiaries (100% owned and purchase method consolidated)
H2: Has multiple levels (conso groups) with overall parent A. All other companies are equity consolidated (ofcourse parents in each group is assigned purchase method, ownership is again 100% of all units)
In H2: we're doing a reparenting. From a lower conso group(cons group CGB with parent B) a unit(unit C) is moving to the top conso group(cons group CGA with parent A). The master data changes in both conso groups have been made(period/yr of divestiture and period/yr of acquisition set in the sender group and receiver group respectively; added the cons unit C in CGA group).
The organizational change logic is being used.
After the conso group change task and COI task are run, in the report there is a difference in the equity PY surplus at level A - overall parent) in both hierarchies.
There are two equity pickups - A/c1 and A/c2
The opening balances on these accounts are getting reversed in the divestiture period in old parent.
Whereas the PY - RE(Previous year - Retained earnings) account is not getting reversed (in itself) but the balance is being posted to COI:Clearing item (COI clearing item defined in COI settings->Appropriation of retained earnings -> Net income tab)
1. The client doesnt want PY equity surplus to change. In H1 , it is not changing (not reversing) whereas, in H2 it is reversing in the same accounts - balancing to zero.
2. They'd ideally want the PY surplus to goto the COI clearing.
They'd like the system to do this entry and not fix this by doing a manual PL30 journal.
Can you tell me if there is anything in the configuration of COI that can fix this issue?
Why is the system behaving differently for A/c1 (and A/c2)and PY - RE account?
Another thing, when I look at the COI documents posted in the H2 hierarchy, I see the A/c1 and A/c2 (scopes of data for equity method) as double the amount in the new cons group (equity holdings data) whereas in the H1 (where only a total transfer doc is posted) I see the accounts (as part of equity data) with the actual value.
Thanks, AJ
Edited by: A J on Nov 17, 2009 3:17 PM

Thanks Dan.
Appreciate if you can help on the below points as well.
1. As part of divestiture/transfer postings: The system is reversing some Previous Year(PY) equity accounts into themselves. How can we get the system to eliminate them by posting to COI Clearing account. Basically, we dont want the PY accounts to be touched?
For the Retained earnings - PY account, the system is actually posting to COI clearing account.
These PY accounts are part of some scopes for equitization.
Is there any link between the "balance carry forward" - list of items table and the divestiture postings?
Does the system check this table while posting/reversing the equity(PY) accounts?
2. I want to understand the sequence in which the system posts the documents at the old parent and new parent (group) level.
The same activity number is there for Total Divestiture, total transfer documents posted at new parent level and total divestiture document posted at old parent level.
Does the system follow bottom up approach? Thereby creating total divestiture document at old parent level.
Followed by documents at upper level (new parent level)
Also , at the upper level(new parent level), does it post documents in the way they are shown in the log? (We havent changed the default sequence maintained in UCWB - COI settings). so it will post first consolidation doc, followed by total divestiture, followed by total transfer docs at the new parent level?
Is this the reason for the double value being posted at new parent for equity holding data?
Will studying the statistical items (corresponding to eliminated equity holding items) be relevant here to understand why at upper level there is double the value being posted by system?
Thanks.

Why I can not find field:Level in Project Hierarchy in BAPI_BUS2054_NEW?

Dear experts,
Why I can not find the field of "Level in Project Hierarchy" in structure BAPI_BUS2054_NEW?
I only define the data to upload wbs:
PROJECT DEFINITION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT PROFILE
WBS Element
WBS description
Can you tell me which fields must to upload?
Looking forward to your reply.
Many thanks.
Merryzhang

Anyone can help me ?I need the field "Level" in BAPI_BUS2054_NEW,But I can not find it.

New Adobe Photoshop elements 11-can not share pictures. I do use AOL email. Get error of "Elements 11 Organ. has stopped working, I have looked into sharing tab and my only option is Adobe email settings. I do have outlook set up to work on computer run

New Adobe Photoshop elements 11-can not share pictures. I do use AOL email. Get error of "Elements 11 Organ. has stopped working, I have looked into sharing tab and my only option is Adobe email settings. I do have outlook set up to work on computer running windows 8.1 Please help, Mainly use to share pictures. Thanks!

One thing puzzles me:
RedClayFarmer wrote:
I then found one suggestion that the problem might involve permissions. The suggestion was to right click PhotoshopElementsOrganizer.exe in its installation folder (which on my computer is at at D:\Photo\Elements 11 Organizer) and run Organizer as an administrator. This also failed.
I don't understand why running the exe from the installation folder would have worked.
I would have simply tried to run that exe from its real location :
Sorry, I can't help you more about permissions...

AWM 10.2.0.1 - I can not choosing Value Based hierarchy

I have Oracle client 10.2.0.1 software with AWM 10.2.0.1 . I want to build a dimension with value-based hierarchy . In AWM I have hierarchy editor with the two radio buttons for choosing type of hierachy : Level Based hierarchy and Value Based hierarchy . But the secod one (Value Based hierarchy) is disabled - I can not choosing this type of hierarchy . Why this?
Thanks in advance,
Aurel

Hi there,
I really would not recommend that you work with the 10.2.0.1 version of AWM. This version is fairly old now and there have been a number of important bug fixes added to more recent releases.
What version of the Oracle database are you running? And on what operating system?
I suggest that you consult the following link and ensure that you are working with the versions of BOTH database and AWM that are recommended by Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/olap/collateral/olap_certification.html
Thanks
Stuart

Consolidation unit's hierarchy can not be organized well in BCS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for