Consumption memory in all instances

I need to know the consume of memory of each user in all the instances from the environment.
The transaction SM04 just show me the consume of memory from the local users
Please, help me.
thanks.

Hi ,
Check ST03 & ST03n for memory consumption for all instance .Including central Instance also.
Regards
KN

Similar Messages

Find All Instances Scripting

Hello, I was wondering if there was a way to programatically use the Find All Instances function with scripting? At the moment my work around is very slow but works.
I have a reference to a VI and I have my project open, I then want to find all the places that this VI is used. At the moment I get all VIs in Memory (Application >> All VIs in Memory), then for each VI I get all SubVIs on the block diagram (Traverse References). Then for each subVI in each VI in memory, I get the path to the VI and compare it to the path of the VI I want to find.
As one can imagine this takes too long. Especially when I can right click my VI's Icon and say Find all Instances and get all 6 instances seemingly instantly. I searched for a while and couldn't figure out if this was possible or how to do it. Thanks.
Attached is my attempt, which just counts the number of times the search VI is called.
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines - Hooovahh - LabVIEW Overlord
If 10 out of 10 experts in any field say something is bad, you should probably take their opinion seriously.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Find All Instances Slow.vi ‏20 KB

Well that was easy, not sure why I didn't think of that. In any case I made a new VI that does what you mention and it indeed works much faster. Attached is the improved version in case someone was interested.
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines - Hooovahh - LabVIEW Overlord
If 10 out of 10 experts in any field say something is bad, you should probably take their opinion seriously.
Attachments:
Find All Instances Faster.vi ‏19 KB

Co-Loc versus Dedicated In-Role Cache - both available to all instances?

Trying to confirm that this is true. The only real difference between the co-located and dedicated in-role cache is that the co-located shares the memory with the role whereas the dedicated uses all the memory of the role. I'm assuming that even in a co-located
cache the cache is synced and not per instance? Meaning if I set up a co-located cache on my web role and that role has multiple instances, the cache will be the same for all instances (objects added to cache from one instance would be available in all instances).
Dan

Hi,
We can see this from Role Cache FAQ (Windows Azure Cache).
Here is a snippet.
What is the difference between co-located and dedicated Caching topologies?
There are two main ways a role can host In-Role Cache: co-located and dedicated. In the co-located topology, the role that hosts In-Role Cache also hosts other web role or worker role functionality. The memory and resources of the role are shared between
caching and non-caching application code and services. In the dedicated topology, which is supported for worker roles, the worker role only hosts caching. These Cache topologies differ primarily in the percentage of memory that is dedicated to Cache. For more
information, see the topics on co-located Caching roles and
dedicated Caching roles.
Best Regards
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Microsoft`s definition of 「All Instance」 for calculating average percentage of CPU usage is a mystery for me !!!.

Hi, I was looking up in the 「How to Auto Scale」 document
　http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/cloud-services-how-to-scale/
and got stuck in the below paragraph, the part that describes how to calculate the
average percentage of CPU usage.
==========
All instances are included when calculating the average percentage of CPU usage and the average is
based on use over the previous hour. Depending on the number of instances that your application is using, it can take longer than the specified wait time for the scale action to occur if the wait time is set very low. The minimum time between scaling actions
is five minutes. Scaling actions cannot occur if any of the instances are in a transitioning state.
==========
Does any one know the microsoft`s definition of 「All Instance」 ?
Whether the virtual machines that are shut down but has been set into auto scaling group count as one of them?
The question is that the response time, the data shows up in the management portal delays a lot comparing to the
real time. I was wondering if the definition of the calculation described above is truly what the user`s want or not.
I`m　all ears to any information. Thanks in advance !!

Hello Tomo Shimazu,
Instance is a presence of a service eg :- VM is an instance. Copy of VM is another instance which is 2 instances of VM.
Although Microsoft’s pricing model is readily available and even offers a simple calculator (http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/advanced/) to assist
in the process, it may be difficult to know how much of each resource you will need to get an estimate.
To understand on calculating the compute instances and the VM size, let’s first take a look at the VM role sizes offered by Microsoft.
The prices per month for each, at the time of writing, are $30, $90, $180, $360, $720 from ExtraSmall to ExtraLarge respectively. So with the exception of the
transition from ExtraSmall to Small, going to the next size VM is exactly twice the cost, which, is mirrored in the increase of resources you get at each level. With each step, CPU Cores, Memory, Disk Space, and Bandwidth are all doubled from the previous.
If this is the case, then, is there any advantage to any one of these over the others? The answer is yes. In the majority of cases, the best bet will be to go with the small instance, with the reason being that because all of these resources scale equally
to cost it is possible to achieve the exact equivalent to a larger VM simply by increasing the number of instances. For example 8 small instances is equivalent to one ExtraLarge instance, with the advantage of the fact that when not needed these small instances
can be turned off and will cost nothing.
By hosting the application in this manner, it increases the effectiveness of the number one reason that a business would transition to the cloud anyway – Scalability.
Obviously 16 smaller instances can be more finely adjusted to the application’s usage than 2 ExtraLarge can. If traffic gets higher or lower than expected, two Small Instances can be added at $180/mo for the time that they are running, versus adding another
ExtraLarge for $720/mo.
The only exception to using the smallest instance, is in the case of the ExtraSmall, which offers only 1/20 of the bandwidth of the Small, making it only feasible
for very lightly accessed applications or, more likely, a QA environment.
From this point, it becomes much easier to estimate the compute instance requirements of migrating the application to Windows Azure. Take the current server(s)
total resources (CPU, RAM, etc) and find how many Small instances it would take to recreate it. This gives a good starting point, however, remember that these instances can be turned on and off to meet demand, and beyond the first instance, there is no charge
when the instances are off. This can lead to significant cost savings, and is the primary incentive to migrating to the cloud.
For azure pricing information, refer
pricing details.
If you still unclear about pricing and billing, you may raise a service request with billing team
here
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Shirisha Paderu

Error on updating Photoshop CC 2014 -- Quit all instances of Adobe Application Manager

Hi,
I've been trying to update my Photoshop and Illustrator CC 2014, but the updates fail with a message that tells me to quit all instances of the Adobe Application Manger. The only problem is when I go into my activity monitor, I don't see that process running at all.
I'm running on a MacBook Pro, OSX 10.9.5, and Adobe CC 1.8.0.447
Thanks for any help you can provide!

A chat session where an agent may remotely look inside your computer may help
Creative Cloud chat support (all Creative Cloud customer service issues)
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html

Crystal 10 server to bo xi 3.1 not all instances

I have used the import wizard to pull the reports across into BO XI 3.1 on server 2003. I get the reports and folders but not all the existing instances of the reports. There are 480 + reports and alot of instances all of which are needed.
Has any one done this migration and get all the historic instances?

If you use the import wizard to bring in the reports, there is an option when you get to the 'Folders and objects' selection tool. Right below the 'Select All' and 'Clear All' buttons, there is a checkbox which states 'Import all instances of each selected object'. This should select all of the instances for the objects selected. One thing to note: It will not import instances that failed to run. You can check the log after the import to see what failed and why after the import. This should give you an idea of what you may have to do on your XI 3.1 environment in order to capture the instances desired.

I want to buy a ipod as my iphone as no memory from all of my music, is there a way of transferring the music from the iphone to the ipod? i dont want to have to re download or buy all of the music again!

i want to buy a ipod as my iphone as no memory from all of my music, is there a way of transferring the music from the iphone to the ipod? i dont want to have to re download or buy all of the music again! Don't want to buy a ipod then find out this! Please help!

You can redownload most iTunes purchases directly to the iPod by:
Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
Otherwise you will have to sync from your iTunes library.

How do I select all instances of a clip in the timeline at once without manually shift clicking each instance?

Title says it all!
How do I select all instances of a clip in the timeline at once without manually shift+clicking each instance?
The reason I want to do this is because I have a music video with MANY quick cuts. So clips are cut up and splattered all over the place. I am colour-correcting now and so I want to be able to select one clip everywhere it exists in the timeline so I can drag the effect onto all them at once, without having to find each instance of the clip in the timeline. This "batch select" would make it so I don't miss any instances of the clip and also saves a ton of time going through the timeline and shift clicking each time the clip turns up.
I hope PP is smart enough to do this
Thanks in advance!
-- Tim

Pick one instance of the clip, maybe even the first bit ... and use the new Master Clip feature ... here's first a written explanation and then a video tutorial on doing this ... it's a great feature.
Adobe Premiere Pro Help | Master Clip Effects
How to apply effects to all instances of a clip | Adobe Premiere Pro CC tutorials
Neil

Can I set an mx control property globaly for all instances of the control.

Is there a way of setting the value of a variable on a control for all instances of the control in the application?
For example, I have several instances of an mx:Label and I want to change the enabled property for all instances at once rather than refer to each one individually by id.

One way is to subclass Button and change its enabled getter to watch some static property. You don’t really want to change Button itself because Buttons exist in lots of places like ScrollBars.

Truncate all Instances in SOA SUITE 11g BPEL SOAINFRA SCHEMA

Hi Guys!
We are running Oracle SOA SUITE 11g + BPEL, Version 11.1.1.3.0 (PS2)
We running out of disk space issues in a database due to large number of test instances in dehydration storage.
Is there any way to TRUNCATE all tables in order to clean up instances from BPEL engine (SOAINFRA schema)
Oracle provides this functionality (purge scripts and implemented procedures in a database) but this is a deleting approach and it doesn't work with millions of instances in a storage. Deleting instances from GUI doesn't work at all.
1. We are looking the way to truncate all instances in a database rather then delete them which takes ages and doesn't work properly in case of huge amount of instances.
2. We would like wipe out all instances without any time restrictions.
Any feedback, script from you guys would be much appreciated.
Cheers!!

Hi,
There still no solution for truncating tables. Looks like we have to look into Oracle's procedures in delivered with SOA SUITE installation.
I posted an article about deleting large number of instances in SOA Suite 11g. It does the job in a pretty fast way.
[Delete large numbers of instances in Oracle SOA Suite 11g|http://emarcel.com/soa-suit/152-deleteinstancessoasuite11gwls]
Cheers!!
emarcel.com

Triggering "exit" event of a drop-down list in all instances of a table row

I have a drop-down list in a table row with multiple instances that performs a calculation on the exit event. This calculation draws information from 2 other dropdown lists contained above in non-repeating rows of the same table.
The desired behavior is: should the user change their choices above, all instances of the drop-down list below would perform the "Exit" event script accessing the new values above.
My script is:
RowOptionalCoverage.DdlCoverageType.execEvent("exit");     this works, sort of
It only updates the first instance of RowOptionalCoverage and none of the subsequent instances. The user can "Tab" through the instances and trigger the Exit event for each instance, but this is not a reasonable solution.
I have tried using the resolveNodes method without success. I understand, using the resolveNodes method may be necessary when referencing multiple instances of an object:
this.resolveNodes("RowOptionalCoverage[*].DdlCoverageType[*]").execEvent("exit");     doesn't work
xfa.resolveNodes("RowOptionalCoverage[*].DdlCoverageType[*]").execEvent("exit");      doesn't work
No doubt, I must be using the resolveNodes incorrectly or missing something? Probably something simple.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Stephen

PERFECT!!! Works right out of the box!
This has opened my eyes to the essential nature of loops. My form is very large and complex and functions correctly, Yet the coding is lacking in sophistication--no loops, functions, fragments or other code efficiencies. I am teaching myself (with the help here) and I have skipped learning and using some techniques when I could things to work using the limited skill set I have.
Sometimes, I just don't "get it". After I fail a few times, I skip it and try something else. Functions are a great example. I could utilize a bunch of these if I could only write one that works. It is frustrating. If I got one to work, I know could write a ton of them. But, there is some essential part of functions I am missing that's preventing me from having my first success with them. (I think it has to do with not understanding arguments completely).
Anyway, I am overjoyed with the solution you provided and I understand it well enough to be able to use again in other situations.
Thanks again!
Stephen

QUESTION: How can I locate all instances of a field in mult tables

Hi all.
So im just learning Oracle and I have an interesting question.
I just learned how you can query things from multiple tables by using the tablename.fieldname in the select.
My question is this. Lets say you have, oh, 100 tables and you have referenced a field like IDNUMBER in ten of the tables.
Now I want to write a query to pull the ID number from those tables but I dont remember every table I used it in.
How can you easilly find all instances of where a field is used in multiple tables? Im hoping I explained this right.

791443 wrote:
AWESOME!! THANKS!!You should be aware that this solution only works to the degree that columns are consistently named.
Consider
CREATE TABLE supplier
(supplier_id      number       not null,
supplier_name varchar2(50) not null,
contact_name      varchar2(50),
CONSTRAINT supplier_pk PRIMARY KEY (supplier_id)
CREATE TABLE purchase_order_hdr
(purchase_order_id      number not null,
   supplier_number      number not null
   CONSTRAINT fk_supplier
   FOREIGN KEY (supplier_number)
   REFERENCES supplier(supplier_id)
CREATE TABLE purchase_order_line
(po_number             number not null,
   po_line_item        number not null,
   vendor_product_code number not null,
   CONSTRAINT fk_supplier
   FOREIGN KEY (supplier_number)
   REFERENCES supplier(supplier_id)
    );So, how do you catch that supplier.supplier_id is the same as purchase_order_hdr.supplier_number or purchase_order_line.po_number is the same as purchase_order_hdr.purchase_order_id?
No, I don't have a solution, just pointing out that you may not be able to depend on a fully automated solution either. It depend on how rigorous your organization is about enforcing naming standards.

In logman, should All Instances include _Total?

Hello
If this question has already been asked and answered elsewhere, my apologies.
I want to collect IIS worker process perfmon data using logman. When I add counters in PerfMon, choosing All Instances gives all instances (each w3wp process for each application pool, plus _Total). When I try to get the same in "logman
create counter" using
-c "\w3svc_w3wp(*)\*"
All I get is _Total, none of the individual instances.
Through getting the wrong end of the stick about parent/instance#index (from
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb490956.aspx), I happened into trying
-c "\w3svc_w3wp(**)\*"
which gave the individual instances but not _Total. I've tried a combination of using (**) and (_Total), but that gave the individual instances only.
I'm sure I'm doing something simple wrong and would appreciate someone telling me what it is.
Thank you
dg
dg

Hello again
I've continued trying to collect program counters for all instances, not only _Total, and not only every individual instance bar _Total.
I thought that it was just Logman that didn't agree with my expectations, but I'm having the same problem with Data Collector Sets made in PerfMon. When running live in PerfMon, I'm collecting for all the instances, which translates as "*" when adding
the counters, but specifically names the instances when I look in
System Monitor Log for that Data Collector Set
Logman query for that Data Collector Set.
(Presumably this means that the application pool worker processes would not be picked up if the application pool recycles, thus changing the ID number at the start of the instance name. But that does not apply to processor instances.)
But when I look at the binary log file in PerfMon, I'm only seeing counters for instance "_Total".
So, it seems that the recorded counters are the same whether I use logman and specify instance "*", or whether I use PerfMon and create a new Data Collector Set from the current live counters. I only get results for _Total, not for individual instances.
I would appreciate guidance to documentation that explains that this is the expected behaviour, or an explanation of how to collect the counters for the individual instances other than in real time.
Please help. Thanks
dg

How can I change the settings of all instances of a particular effect?

I've applied the same color correction effect to a lot of clips in the timeline. Now I want to fine tune the color correction (same setting for all clips still). How can I change the setting of all instances of the color correction effect without going into each clip manually?
Looking forward to your thoughts on this!! Go on and save my cold winter editing day ...

I was first hoping for File> New > Adjustment layer, but it's always greyed out. I thought that would create an adjustment layer, maybe I'm misunderstanding something? Anyway, if I create a black video stump and then right click it and choose "Adjustment layer", it will turn into one, and everything works as it should with that. If the black video become adjustment layer is placed on a video track atop my video, and I add for example color correction to it, it will be applied to the videos below.

Globally Changing all Instances of a CSS Style to Another

I'm working with RH6 (HTML). I'm curious if there is a
method/tool that will allow me to take all instances of a certain
CSS style and replace it with another (e.g., in the same manner
that you can using FrameMaker and Paragraph/Character Styles). I'd
like to be able to do it project-wide, but if it has to be done on
a topic-by-topic basis, that would be OK... I'm just trying to
avoid the need to locate each instance of the style and manually
change it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Hey guys... thanks for the feedback. For starters, I
have created an external CSS (using RH)... So, I'm good
there. Anyway, my scenario is similar to what Peter pointed out: I
used a bad naming convention for a style, and applied it to a bunch
of content pages, and later came up with a better naming convention
(and a better set up for the style -- I know, I know... poor
planning on my part). I began applying the new style in future
documents, and I'd like to apply the style to all applicable
instances in the existing pages. So, I was wondering if a
tool/utility existed that would allow me to do so (since one does
exist in FrameMaker).
I could just let it go, but we intend to hire a new writer in
the near future, and I don't want that person to have to deal with
my inconsistency (not to mention, it would make things a little
easier when outputting to Word, in that I'll have fewer styles to
manage).
The concept of performing a search/replace for all instances
of the offending style name in the HTML files is a good one, and I
could try that (why are the simple solutions always the hardest
ones to realize?) Anyway, I'm assuming that all I would need to do
is perform a search for "<span class=Old_Style_Name>", and
change them all to "<span class=New_Style_Name>", correct?
And you recommend, "FAR" to do that?
Again thanks for the recommendations!

Consumption memory in all instances

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for