Contact Point for a HIGHER level of development licensing for iPhone?

I know about the Enterprise Program.
I know about the Individual Developer Program.
I am looking for a contact point, for which our legal team could contact for a development/licensing agreement that doesn't fit within either of those two programs.
The company I work for is not small potatos and is a major player in the market we are focusing on. We are still far from of till we have a complete product, but our legal team wants to start discussions now with Apple... so everything can get worked out by the time we are ready to go.
So if one of the Apple folks see this, I am sure you can see my email address in my private profile... please email me directly. If someone else happens to know, please post it if you can. Even if it is just a number, that I can call to talk to someone... to get the next phone number to call.
I hope that all made sense.

Actually... yes, that is 1 of the 2 reasons I posted here.
Reason 1: That those that have the administrative and moderation access in this forum, also has access to the account information of the members that have signed up here. Which pretty much every forum software package grants the rights to those of the administrative/moderator staff. Or at least at a minimum could reply to the post, with the information that I am seeking.
Reason 2: This is a discussion forum, and I thought... people come here to help one another. And as I listed before, we tried the LEGAL contact page on Apple.com, no luck there. We tried going via iPhone developer program information contacts... dead end. And our legal contacts did in fact try to reach out to contacts that we also did have on file... and those also ended up in a dead end.
So excuse me for using yet another avenue of communicating with Apple and people who may also have or are going through the same situation.
As for the sarcastic replies... I know exactly why I am getting them, and hence why I returned them. I am absolutely no stranger to the anonymous world of discussion forums. But if you want to continue thinking that everything is just like slicing a piece of apple pie, and serving...
Then you seriously underestimating the complexity of issues like this.
All I did was come here to ask for some assistance when every known avenue has turned up to be a dead end. I thank the person that provided at least another avenue, that may lead to proper solution.
Grouch Marx was an interesting character. Last I checked, this wasn't a club. Or maybe it is, and you only want to keep to your own and forget the thousands if not magnitudes more of people that are just looking for a simple answer to a problem.

Similar Messages

  • Error: Maintain settlement rule of the sender for a higher level WBS

    Hi,
    I dont want to maintain the settlement rule for a higher level WBS. How can i configure this in such a way that i dont get the following error:" Maintain settlement rule of the sender" while doing CJ88. Maintaing a separate Settlement profile for a higher level WBS is an option but we are looking if something else could be done The problem is that there are no actuals booked against, say, level 2 WBS but when i execute CJ88, i get the aforesaid error. How can i ensure that only the lowest level WBS ask for the settlement rule and not the levels above it. I have already removed the Investment profile from the higher level WBS but still getting the same error.
    Regards,
    DPil

    Hi,
    It is a type Capex WBS and Biling element is not checked. In fact i get a warning while doing the settlement: WBS is neither a billing element nor an account assignment element.
    Diagnosis
    WBS element  is not indicated as either an account assignment element or as a billing element in the master record.
    System Response
    The WBS element cannot be assigned to an account.
    Procedure
    Correct your entries or add the missing indicator to the master record for the WBS element.
    But this is just a warning. On pressing enter i get the error :Maintain settlement rule of the sender "

  • Design considerations for wrapping higher level process

    So Ive used workflow now on a few projects and have become comfortable building/coding with it.  Recently a discussion was started to design a new process to automate a part of the business Im in and there are several different departments, each with
    their own different functions and processes that they perform.  During this discussion, the thought came to me - why stop with just the "small" picture where I was using WF to contain and execute business rules, but also wrap the higher level
    abstractions also.
    For example, a department performs steps A, B and C.  Each step might have some branching in it (if/then etc).  Its only the "steps Im using workflow currently.
    Above the department, there is another layer, lets call it "group".  There would be several different groups, each with its own departments, some with the same name as other groups, but the internal structure might be different for a given
    department between groups.  So this means that if I modeled a department in one group, I cant assume I can reuse that department in another groups workflow.
    My main unknown however, is how would a user interact with a workflow that was this high level.  Abstracting higher levels, means users dont need to interact with or execute the whole workflow each time, only a part of it.  So am I looking at pausing/resuming
    the bigger workflow?  How can I "skip" to a certain stage or area of a workflow, bypassing the stuff that has already been done? 
    Correct me if Im wrong, but this seems to be where I need to look at bookmarks?  
    In my case, something similar to an order in a shopping cart is what would be the input type for the bigger workflow.  There are several different groups of users that have to set or add properties to associated objects (sql tables) related to the order
    before it can be marked "complete".
    How would you tie together a "wizard" type concept with workflow?  This seems to be the type of model we are considering.  A user takes an order a few steps, then another user from a different group/department adds some attributes and
    the workflow/wizard continues a few more levels down.  Finally, after all the rules have been matched and required data provided, the workflow can "finish".
    Hope my description seems clear.  

    My main unknown however, is how would a user interact with a workflow that was this high level.  Abstracting higher levels, means users dont need to interact with or execute the whole workflow each time, only a part of it.  So am I looking at pausing/resuming
    the bigger workflow?  How can I "skip" to a certain stage or area of a workflow, bypassing the stuff that has already been done? 
    If you want to skip to certain state or bypass what stuff that has been done, you need give logic judgment first. Bookmarks are the mechanism that enables an activity to passively wait for input without holding onto a workflow thread. When an activity signals
    that it is waiting for stimulus, it can create a bookmark. So bookmark is available for you during create this application.
    Here are some workflow applications, see:
    Workflow Application
    hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Angie
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Developer licensing for CS and CC products

    Hello,
    I am trying to find information on obtaining developer licensing for older Adobe CS and current Adobe CC products.
    I am a software developer and my software interacts with all Mac Desktop applications via Apple's Accessibility API. In order to ensure proper communication between my app and Adobe Apps, I need to be able to run Adobe Apps for the purpose of testing. Ideally, I am hoping that Adobe has a developer program or is able to (on a case-by-case basis) provide licenses to a developer either a) at a discount or b) do some sort of license trade. If anyone know who to contact or what options are available, I would really appreciate some assistance. I have looked at the Adobe developer programs and SDK's, but that is not what I am looking for. I am not developing add-ons for Adobe products but rather I need to test that my software works properly with the dozens of Adobe applications. As an independent developer purchasing licenses for all Adobe products is not an option. Additionally, I need to be able to test older versions of Adobe Apps such as the CS5 and CS6, so I need access to that software as well.
    Ensuring compatibility of my Accessibility application with Adobe products has proven to be a nearly impossible task due to the inconsistent behavior of some Adobe applications. I put a lot of time and effort into making sure my software works with all applications and Adobe products seem to be the most troublesome. Most non-Adobe applications work perfectly with my application and it seems that every version of every Adobe app requires special coding within my app to accommodate Adobe apps. It would be great if Adobe could somehow accommodate my licensing needs.
    Specifically, I am looking for answers to the following questions:
    Does Adobe offer free/discounted developer licenses for the purpose of compatibility testing?
    Does any Adobe developer program allow access to the entire Adobe product line going back as far as CS5?
    Who do I contact at Adobe to discuss my needs and possible solutions?
    Thanks in advance for any assistance.

    In order to gain access to older versions you would have to have an existing license that entitle you to use them, but otherwise it's only Creative Cloud and a bit of CS6 from here on, with even CS6 phasing out. Since you are not developing actual Adobe software, this also severely limits your chances of being accepted into any Beta/ Developer program, but feel free to try:
    http://prerelease.adobe.com/
    Note that there is no global CC program and the applications are handled individually for every app. It's entirely up to the teams to let you in or kick you out.
    Mylenium

  • High-level view of steps for 10g OWB-OLAP to Discoverer

    I would greatly appreciate ANY feedback to the following steps. These are not necessarily correct or the best way to do this. I am attempting to take source data, use OWB, create the analytical workspace, and from there have the metadata available and used by Discoverer.
    This is rather high-level, feel free to jump in anywhere.
    We are trying to see if we can get away with NOT using the Analytical workspace manager (AWM) if possible. With that in mind, we are trying to make the most of the process with OWB & OLAP.
    Is this possible to do without ever using the AWM? Can we go end to end (source data--->discoverer final reporting) primarily using OWB to get to the point where we can use the metadata for Discoverer?
    Can anyone relate experiences perhaps that would make me want to consider using the AWM at certain points instead?
    Most importantly, if I do use this methodology, would I be safe after everything has been setup? WOuld I want to consider using AWM at a later point for performance reasons while I am using Discoverer? Or would OWB be helpful as well in some aspects in maintenance of data? Any clue on how often I might need to rebuild, and if so, what to use in that case to minimize time?
    Thanks so much for any insight or opinion on anything I have mentioned!

    Hi Gregory,
    I guess the answer is that this depends. My first question is whether you are looking at a Relational OLAP or Multi Dimensional OLAP solution? This may change the discussion slightly, but just lets look at some thoughts:
    In essence you can use the OWB bridge to generate the AW objects (cubes etc). If you do that (for either ROLAP or MOLAP) you will get the AW objects enabled for querying, using any OLAPI query tool, like BI Beans or the new Discoverer for OLAP. The current OWB release does not run the discoverer enabler (creating views specifically written for EUL support in Disco classic).
    So if you are looking at Disco classic you must use the AWM route...
    The other things that you must be aware off is that the OWB technology is limited to cloning the relational objects for now. This means that you will create a new model based on your existing data. If you want to tweak the objects generated you will probably need to go to the underlying code in either scenario.
    So if you want to create calculated measures for example you could generate a cube with OWB, create a "dummy measure" and add the formula in OLAP DML. The same will go for some other objects you may want to create such as text measures...
    The benefit of creating place holder or dummy measures is that the metadata is completely in order, you simply change the measure's behavior...
    For the future (the beta starts relatively soon) OWB will support much more modeling, like logical cubes and you can then directly deploy to OLAP. Also the mappings are transparent to the storage. So you map to a logical cube and OWB will implement the correct to load either OLAP or relational targets.
    We will also start supporting calculated measures, sparsity definitions, partioning and compression on cubes, as we will support parallel building of cubes.
    Hope this gives you some insight!
    Jean-Pierre

  • Returning the macbook for a higher level macbook?!?!??!

    Hi all,
    I just got my macbook 13 aluminum (2.0 GHz) on 14th April 2009 which was supposed to be delivered to me on 7th April, but because my office was closed so I got my macbook on 14th Arpil 2009. I would like to ask if I can return the current one and get a higher level one which is macbook 13 aluminum (2.4 GHz), as I found that the backlight keyboard is great and I want my macbook with faster performance. In fact, I returned my macbook to Apple before because there was a scratch on the keyboard, and Apple gave me a new macbook 13 aluminum which I am currently using now. So because I got my macbook on 14th instead of 7th because of the delivery problem, base on the 15 days policy, should the date starts on 7th or 14th? And am I suppose to return it and get a higher level one, i am willing to pay more for that.
    Thanks!

    You'll need to contact Apple on that. There are a few ways they can handle it. First of all, they usually consider your original purchase date for returns. If you have had yours replaced, the replacement date is not usually considered the original purchase date... so you're likely past your 14 day return period. If they make an exception, as you know, you typically have 14 days to make a return... that return period should commence on the date you accept delivery of the product. Provided you have documentation to show when the product was delivered, they may commence the 14 day period from that time. There is also generally a 10% restocking fee for returned products. The only way to know for sure is to contact Apple. This is just a user-to-user forum and Apple will not respond directly to comments posted here.

  • I purchased my apple developer license for my self but it says it is ontacting Your Reference We are contacting the reference.

    Hey,
    I purchased my apple developer license 24 hours ago. But still, it says this:
    Enrollment Status:
    1. Submit
    2. Identity Verification
    3. Accept License Agreement
    4. Purchase and Activate
    Contacting Your Reference
    We are contacting the reference you provided to verify that you have the authority to act on behalf of your company/organization and to enter your company/organization into legal agreements.
    I have already paid and recieved the invoices and receipts. But still, it says this.

    Call 'em up - lots of people having issues getting their dev accounts lately.
    Apple Developer Relations: 
    (800) 633 2152
    (408) 974 4897

  • ABAP development license for integration certification

    Hello to all the forum members,
    My company is interested in certification some ABAP development that was developed for one of our costumers.
    The development was done using a developer license of the costumer and as we understood, ABAP development license is a pre-requisite to the integration certification process in order to receive your own name space.
    Could you please let me know if the costumer developer license is enough for us to start with the integration certification process.
    Thanks,
    Amit

    Hi Amit,
    I also have something I want to present as "Powered by NetWeaver".
    Maybe we can combine forces and marketing?
    please contact me at: [email protected]
    I will call you back.
    BTW, I live now in Canada...
    thanks,
    Itay Avni

  • Development license for WLS 9.1

    Hello,
    My company have purchased two production licenses for WLS version 9.1. My question is do we get free on development license since we have purchased production license? is there any extra steps that I need to take in order to get the free development license.
    2) Is there a way to check the maximum connection for production weblogic server?
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    kyuan

    Kristy Yuan wrote:
    I sent out two emails ( 2/14 and 2/24) to [email protected], but have not received any response from BEA.
    Is there a phone number I can reach or can you forward it to someone? My co-worker who purchased License
    felt frustration when contacting BEA regarding to this issue.
    kyuanSend me your contact information and whatever BEA info
    you have regarding the purchased licence, to the email
    address below. I will make sure you're contacted by support.
    Joe
    j
    o
    e
    b
    e
    a
    c
    o
    m

  • Voting Thread for the SAP NetWeaver ABAP Developer Edition for Windows 7

    Hi Everyone,
    as Mario Herger suggested in the discussion to his Blog [New Community Developer License is available|/people/mario.herger/blog/2010/01/20/new-community-developer-license-is-available] I start the topic requesting a SAP NetWeaver ABAP Developer Edition for Windows 7.
    Best regards
    Gregor

    Currently, ABAP Developer Edition can be installed on Windows XP Mode for Windows 7 (Pro,Business,Ultimate).
    Here some usefull links:
    [http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtual-pc/download.aspx]
    [http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-20000693-56.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0]
    [http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=5607&tag=mncol;txt]

  • Voting Thread for the SAP NetWeaver ABAP Developer Edition for VMWare

    Hi Everyone,
    as Mario Herger suggested in the discussion to his Blog [New Community Developer License is available|/people/mario.herger/blog/2010/01/20/new-community-developer-license-is-available] I start the topic requesting a SAP NetWeaver ABAP Developer Edition for VMWare.
    Best regards
    Gregor

    Hi everyone,
    please check out the Wiki Page: [Testdrive on Linux|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/XgJ8C] where you find the section "Netweaver 7.02 (projected)". So let's hope that this version will be released soon as the RampUp is already running.
    Best regards
    Gregor

  • Voting Thread for the SAP NetWeaver ABAP Developer Edition for Linux

    Hi Everyone,
    as Mario Herger suggested in the discussion to his Blog [New Community Developer License is available|/people/mario.herger/blog/2010/01/20/new-community-developer-license-is-available] I start the topic requesting a SAP NetWeaver ABAP Developer Edition for Linux.
    Best regards
    Gregor

    I think having a pre-packaged VMWare machine running on Windows or Linux would be great as it would help a lot of the non-Basis consultants get a system up and running. Perhaps even offer it as an AMI package on AWS so that hardware is not an issue.
    I'd also like to see the traditional installation packages offered as many technical consultants use the build as a process to look at installation issue and post installation configuration.
    I think both the pre-built and build it from scratch approaches have an audience here on SDN and I'd like to see both being offered.
    In fact I'm just looking at the new license options one of which come with the DVD's which is ideal but at a price!
    Thanks,
    George M-A

  • Flash Builder 4.5 iOS Development license for teacing purposes

    I teach in an academic institution where we have Flash Builder 4.5 installed.The current set up only allows us to configure apps for the android platform and not for iOS.Is it possible to configure the application for the iOS platform purely for the purpose of developing apps for academic study?

    Dear Flexer,
    At this time, you can only create an AS project for iOs.
    I heard, that whis realease of Flash Builder 4.5 you can create mxml
    project for all plateform.
    Best regards
    Isabelle LOYER
    InterSystemes
    20 rue de Montubois
    95840 Bethemont la Foret
    Tel : 33 +1 34 69 22 66
    Fax : 33 +1 34 69 26 28
    email : [email protected]
    www.intersystemes.fr
    www.intersystemes.net
    Le 20/06/11 10:29, Arun Ganesh a écrit :
    me to waiting for the response
    >

  • Cannot get rid of critical notification to "Get a developer license" for Windows store and phone apps

    I have no intention of developing such apps so I'm not going to get a license for them. How do I get rid of this notification?

    Hi CarlinScott,
    This KB update explained such issue in VS2013 Update 4 and provided a fix for such issue, reference:
    https://support.microsoft.com/kb/3018885?wa=wsignin1.0
    You can try to
    Download for Update to Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 Update 4 (http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=44998)    
    Hoping it can help you.
    Thanks,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Sugestion for a higher level of security in APEX

    I have noticed that APEX's developer interface supports page groups but you cannot use page groups to manage security. In most of the programs I build, it would be very useful to be able to blanket apply security settings over a group of settings in one location rather than having to go to each page. Example, I have a program where you have to be in a database table to be able to access a large part of it. I would like to be able to go one place group those pages together and then set an authorization scheme and or conditions that would apply to every page in that group and not just a single page. I would also to not just have this set the page level security but retain the ability to tighten up the security to fine tune the access to individual pages in the page grouping if required. I have many cases where I really need a compound security setup where multiple authorization schemes are checked. I know I can build new schemes but it would be more efficient to be able to layer them to form my security setup from lower levels of security (designed to cover a general group of pages) to strongest (designed to be applied to one or more specific pages) in a way where their effects would compound and you would need to pass each of them in order to be authorized to view the page.
    I don't know if this is practical but its just a thought for the future.

    Actually... yes, that is 1 of the 2 reasons I posted here.
    Reason 1: That those that have the administrative and moderation access in this forum, also has access to the account information of the members that have signed up here. Which pretty much every forum software package grants the rights to those of the administrative/moderator staff. Or at least at a minimum could reply to the post, with the information that I am seeking.
    Reason 2: This is a discussion forum, and I thought... people come here to help one another. And as I listed before, we tried the LEGAL contact page on Apple.com, no luck there. We tried going via iPhone developer program information contacts... dead end. And our legal contacts did in fact try to reach out to contacts that we also did have on file... and those also ended up in a dead end.
    So excuse me for using yet another avenue of communicating with Apple and people who may also have or are going through the same situation.
    As for the sarcastic replies... I know exactly why I am getting them, and hence why I returned them. I am absolutely no stranger to the anonymous world of discussion forums. But if you want to continue thinking that everything is just like slicing a piece of apple pie, and serving...
    Then you seriously underestimating the complexity of issues like this.
    All I did was come here to ask for some assistance when every known avenue has turned up to be a dead end. I thank the person that provided at least another avenue, that may lead to proper solution.
    Grouch Marx was an interesting character. Last I checked, this wasn't a club. Or maybe it is, and you only want to keep to your own and forget the thousands if not magnitudes more of people that are just looking for a simple answer to a problem.

Maybe you are looking for