Content sort on merged folders

Hello experts,
in the content administration I have defined three roles with following structure
RoleA
Reports - folder entry point
-Projects - folder
--ReportA1
--ReportA2
RoleB
Reports - folder entry point
-Projects - folder
--ReportB1
--ReportB2
--ReportB3
The folders "Report" and "Projects" in both the roles are identified with same Merge ID. Subsequetly when a user has both the roles assigned he or she sees following structure:
Reports
--Projects
--ReportA1
--ReportA2
--ReportB1
--ReportB2
--ReportB3
so far so good. Now I want to reorder the reports in the Projets folder following way:
Reports
--Projects
--ReportB1
--ReportB2
--ReportB3
--ReportA1
--ReportA2
I tried to change the attribute "Sort Order" on individual reports or on the folders (Reports, Projects) in both the roles but without any effect on the display order.
Can someone help?
Regards
Jiri

Hi Jiri,
Change the merge priority so that Role B becomes the dominant role.
Refer
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/53/89503ede925441e10000000a114084/content.htm
Thanks
Prashant

Similar Messages

How do I sort the bookmark folders themselves instead of just their contents?

All answers I've found so far describe how to sort the bookmarks WITHIN a folder. I need to sort the actual folders, not their contents.

Bookmarks are sorted between separators, so you can (temporarily) add a separator under a list of folders to sort only these folders.
See also:
*https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/auto-sort-bookmarks/

Merging folders and files in the Mountain Lion

After updated from Lion to Mountain Lion I can`t to merge folders using the key option/alt. I lost many important files doing this process. What the best solution to resolve this problem? I`m tired to find a solution for do it.

I was seaching the Java website for JME technical articles and found a great article !!
http://developers.sun.com/techtopics/mobility/apis/articles/fileconnection/index.html

I cannot find a way to sort the bookmark folders themselves alphabetically by name.I am not talking about in a view mode but in the way they are displayed when I click on my bookmarks tab. Can someone explain to me how to accomplish this.

I have a lot of various book mark folders with websites contained within each folder. I am able to sort the websites within each folder alphabetically by name but I cannot find a way to sort the bookmark folders themselves alphabetically by name.I am not talking about in a view mode but in the way they are displayed when I click on my bookmarks tab. Can someone explain to me how to accomplish this other than manually dragging them as this is extremely hard for me due to the fact that I am a quadriplegic with limited hand movement dexterity

Bookmark folders that you created are in the Bookmarks Menu folder. "Sort" that folder.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Sorting_bookmarks_alphabetically

Files dont sort correctly in folders

After an archival re-intallation of OSX5.8, files dont sort correctly in folders; if I delete/paste a folder to an external hard-drive, they sort correctly. But when transferred back to the internal hard-drive in the same way, they once again sort incorrectly.
I have no idea what the problem might be...its odd, isnt it?

Details on what you mean by *incorrect sort*. In one place you discuss folders, in another, files.

Sorting into date folders

I am new to Lightroom having used iPhoto. I've imported scanned photos into LR4 and have changed the capture dates to reflect the original capture date of each photo imported. My LR Library is sorted by Date folders. How do I automatically get these photos sorted into their respective date folders?

Is there an add-on that can automatically send the photos to their respective folders once edited?
There may be such a plugin, I don't know. You could certainly do this via the export command in Lightroom. You could do this via a publish service in Lightroom.
But let's talk about saving (or "exporting" is the LR word) photos. You do not need to do this to save/export the edited photo, like you might have to do in other software that you may have used. Your edits are automaticdally saved in Lightroom's catalog; you do not need to initiate a save or export action to save your edits. It happens automatically.
So, there is no need to export the photos to a separate folder -- in fact I think this is unnecessary work. Lightroom can display your edited and unedited photos for you. Many people do not automatically export EVERY photo once edited; rather the edited photos are ONLY exported when you need to make some use of the photos outside of Lightroom (web, e-mail, commercial printer, other application), and then they can be considered temporary and deleted once you have completed your use of them.
This would be a good time for you to view some videos about Lightroom, as I think you are having trouble with some very basic concepts in Lightroom.
Please view some introductory videos about Lightroom, as your questions indicate this would be a good time to view these.
http://tv.adobe.com/watch/getting-started-with-adobe-photoshop-lightro om-5/lightroom-5-importing-your-images/
http://tv.adobe.com/watch/getting-started-with-adobe-photoshop-lightro om-5/lightroom-5-organizing-your-images/
and other videos at
http://tv.adobe.com/product/lightroom/

SORT Not merging similar fields if there are any editable fields in the ALV

Hi All,
I have two issues with my OOPS ALV report.
1) Standard sort is not working :
Output of the report looks like this
WBS    TEXT          Period 1 Period 2
A           Total hours     1         1
A           Total hours     1         1
A           Total COSt     1         1
A          Total COST     1         1
My agenda is to calculate sub total of period1 and period 2 based on fields WBS and TEXT, my output should look like
WBS    TEXT          Period 1 Period 2
A          Total hours         1           1
                                     1           1
Total hours                     2           2 ( Sub total )
A          Total COST        1         1
                                     1         1
Total COST                    2         2 ( Sub total )
To achieve this i pass these two fields in the sort table and pass field subtot = 'X' for TEXT field.
It is working fine, i am getting the sub totals but the WBS field are not grouped( Even though it is a standard functionality).
my output looks like
WBS    TEXT          Period 1 Period 2
A         Total hours   1         1
A         Total hours   1         1
Total hours               2         2 ( Sub total )
A      Total COST      1         1
A      Total COST      1         1
Total COST              2         2 ( Sub total )
I have few editable fields in my output, i came to know this issue is because of the editable fields. have anybody come across the same error.
Please let me know how to achieve the standard sort ( Merging similar values ) functionality even if the output has editable fields.
2) IS it possible to get two Grand total based on a field value . In my example , my TEXT field will always have value either 'Total hours' or 'Total COST'
my output should look like this.
WBS    TEXT          Period 1 Period 2
A      Total hours     1         1
                              1         1
Total hours(A)          2         2 ( Sub total )
A      Total COST     1         1
                              1         1
Total COST(A)         2         2 ( Sub total )
B      Total hours      1         1
                              1         1
Total hours(B)          2         2 ( Sub total )
B      Total COST      1         1
                                1         1
Total COST(B)           2         2 ( Sub total )
GRAND TOTAL HOURS    4         4
GRAND TOTAL COST       4         4.
Response will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajanidhi Rajasekeran
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Jul 14, 2008 7:39 PM

Hi
If I make the editable field to non editable then sort & cell merge is happening but if I make any of the field as editable then merge is not working shall i request you the solution
Regards-Sreeni

Merge Folders in ms/%default directory

I found these Part.xxxxxxx.merge folders in my datastore drive and they are using up about 40gb of space. I'm wondering what these are for and how/if I can clean them up.
Vincent Sprague

Hi Vincent,
It seems the folder is not created by Exchange Server. Consequently, I’d recommend you verify whether the folder can be modified in the first place.
We can try rename the folder and see if the Exchange environment is affected.
Regards,
Rebecca
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Merge folders in Mavericks.

How do I merge folders in Mavericks? I have multiple folders and wish to merge all at once. Each folder has multiple subdirectories as well.

Hi Vincent,
It seems the folder is not created by Exchange Server. Consequently, I’d recommend you verify whether the folder can be modified in the first place.
We can try rename the folder and see if the Exchange environment is affected.
Regards,
Rebecca
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

How to merge folders?

I create two folders with the same name. How do I merge them?

You cant' merge folders by dragging one folder onto another. Open one of the folders and drag the icons from one folder to the other folder by tapping and holding down on the icons until they wiggle, then you can move them.
If the iPad named a second folder with the same name as the first folder (which the iPad is apt to do on it's own) rename one of the folders. Open the folder, tap and hold down on an icon until they wiggle, the folder name will appear in a white horizontal bar, tap the bar, the keyboard will pop up and you can rename the folder.

HT204053 My wife and I share one Apple ID. I am on iCloud and she is not (yet). If she turns on here iCloud capability does that mean our device content will be merged?

My wife and I share one Apple ID. I am on iCloud and she is not (yet). If she turns on here iCloud capability does that mean our device content will be merged?

Welcome to the Apple Community.
To begin with, I would like to try to explain Apple's confusing nomenclature in regard to iCloud.
Apple have called the whole cloud thing iCloud, there are a number of features under the iCloud umbrella, some of which require their own login. iTunes is one of these, another is what Apple have unfortunately also called iCloud too.
You can use the same Apple ID (account) to login to both iCloud and iTunes, but you don't need to and often users will login to each service using a different ID.
The part that you need to remember is that the services available when you log into iCloud are completely different and unrelated to those when you log in to iTunes. Your iCloud login enables mail, contacts, calendars, find my phone, Back to My Mac, Documents & Data sharing and photostream, it does not affect any of your iTunes services.
To avoid confusion when discussing your problem, when I mention iCloud, I am referring to the services under the iCloud login, Whereas I will refer to the whole cloud thing as The Cloud.
To avoid your data being merged, your wife should open a new account and use it just for iCloud, she can continue to use the existing account for iTunes, so that you can continue to share your iTunes content.

Sort priority of merged folders and worksets

Hi Forum!
I have a challenge, which I hope some of you can contribute to solving:
I'm trying to merge several roles, which have different structures, but I can't get the sorting to work. Here goes :
Structure of my different roles:
1 : Role -> Folder -> iView
2 : Role -> Folder -> Workset -> ....
I've setup merge ID's on the folders, so they merge fine into one top-level navigation item - no problem here.
But my problem is to control 2nd. level navigation. I can't set any navigational priorities on the iView directly attached to the folder, which leaves me without any possibility to control the sort-sequence on 2nd level. I already tried to insert a folder or workset in between the folder and iView level, but this also results in an additional navigation layer, which I don't want.
Any ideas, on how to solve this ?
Rgds.
Claus Gosmer

Hi Claus,
the property you are looking for is called "Sort Priority" (or Sortierpriorität in German).
This property is available for iViews, pages, worksets and folders. SAP Help link
If none of the objects has a sort priority or all objects have the same priority the content is displayed in the order of appearance in the role. If some have a sort priority and some not the ones with prio are displayed first in the order of ther prio and then the rest...
Should work that way!
Hth,
Michael

Virtual merged folders

hi there.
i want to make a virtual folder which displays the merged contents of multiple folders. i'm finding it harder than i thought and i'd be grateful for a solution if anyone has one.
i have one large folder on an 800gig partition where my media files go and it's pretty much full, so it's time to start saving my stuff to a new location on another drive. the way i'd like to handle this is just to drop in a new 1TB drive and have the big folder appear as having 1800gigs.
i don't want to do a concatenated RAID, i'm perfectly happy with the files being on separate drives, i just want the contents appearing to me, the user, as being in one place
this would be super simple if spotlight would just let me specify the search locations; i could tell it to 'select all' from folder X and folder Y and save it as a folder. iTunes does this really easily as well.
the closest i got with spotlight was searching "this mac" for folders containing a string common to both folder names and type='folder'. in the finder this would just show the two folders but in path finder i was able to expand the folders. that's almost what i want except i don't want the files from each respective folder to be segregated, i want them all mixed in together; i don't care and don't want to know which of the two folders actually contains this or that file.
does it make sense what i'm trying to do? anyone have an idea how i can do it?
thanks

Francine Schwieder wrote:
You can edit a Saved Search to have it work on two seperate locations--I have one that searches my home folder and a folder on my data drive. However, it is a pain to set it up, as you must open the Saved Search as file and then edit a couple of entries and resave it.
good point, I think I saw your posts about doing it but I forgot about this.
You might find one of the third party search programs will do what you want. NotLight can be told to search in a number of places, but you can sort the results only by name, location or size, not by date. Also its "save" function seems to not actually work (it saves its searches as an .xml file, and doesn't reopen them with a double click). Also, it was written for Tiger, not Leopard, and has not been updated. HoudahSpot may work better (I haven't used it) but it costs 25 bucks.
It MIGHT be possible to write an AppleScript that runs Find on folder A, then on folder B, and outputs a combination result, afraid I'm not enough of a scripter to know. You could try asking in the Applescript forum:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=724
If it can be done some one there would know.
Nothing you can do with plain apple script will be very useful. It has a very limited ability in terms of displaying things. the right solution would be for apple to bring back this function to GUI searches. since it's still possible to achieve by editing the saved search file this should not be that complicated.
Francine
Francine
Schwieder

Can't sort files and folders

Two questions:
1. In a folder I want to sort the items in order allways folders first and second files by namne but sometimes the folders last. Is it any way to solve this? The Mac mixed sorting makes me mad.
2. When in Finder-menu View the choice Clean Up and Arrange by is grey and can't be used. How come? Is it possible to make these choices active?
Svante

It's always frustrating when the designers didn't think to do it 'your' way. But we all figured out how to drive cars that were built 'their' way and we can do this too. The fact that MicroSoft did it another way, just is not relevant to working with your Mac. We're still coping with sillyunderscoresover here, and now our apps quit on us when we close their windows.
You like a hierarchy that puts folders before individual file items: Make a folder, call it "Directories" (or even better " Directories", or "•Folders"), put all your folders in that window into it, and if you want, make a companion "Documents" folder for everything else. Click the flippy triangles of both to reveal their contents. There, everything in list order, folders first. You will have to do a teensy bit of handfiling you're not used to, but as others mentioned a simple naming convention would have spared you that (and this suggestion). If you truly hate the look, you can make invisible custom icons for the two folders and use a style like:"••••••Folders•••••", "-----Files----" so they look like headers.
People have complained about missing this Windows 'feature' before without ever convincing me of its virtue. I can see which items are folders and don't need them artificially at the top (Sort by kind does that if ever I do) and find the integrated alphanumeric list useful for grouping unfiled documents near their folders. When I want the first item(s) on the list to be a folder, I so name it. You can cope, just like you can learn to navigate a new subdivision with all the cul-de-sacs. Now if I could just get used to this silly idea North Americans have that we should drive on the right.
Message was edited by: Ed Hanna
Message was edited by: Ed Hanna

Can't sort files and folders. Sorry doubble mailed

Two questions:
1. In a folder I want to sort the items in order allways folders first and second files by namne but sometimes the folders last. Is it any way to solve this? The Mac mixed sorting makes me mad.
2. When in Finder-menu View the choice Clean Up and Arrange by is grey and can't be used. How come? Is it possible to make these choices active?
Svante
Message was edited by: Svante

It's always frustrating when the designers didn't think to do it 'your' way. But we all figured out how to drive cars that were built 'their' way and we can do this too. The fact that MicroSoft did it another way, just is not relevant to working with your Mac. We're still coping with sillyunderscoresover here, and now our apps quit on us when we close their windows.
You like a hierarchy that puts folders before individual file items: Make a folder, call it "Directories" (or even better " Directories", or "•Folders"), put all your folders in that window into it, and if you want, make a companion "Documents" folder for everything else. Click the flippy triangles of both to reveal their contents. There, everything in list order, folders first. You will have to do a teensy bit of handfiling you're not used to, but as others mentioned a simple naming convention would have spared you that (and this suggestion). If you truly hate the look, you can make invisible custom icons for the two folders and use a style like:"••••••Folders•••••", "-----Files----" so they look like headers.
People have complained about missing this Windows 'feature' before without ever convincing me of its virtue. I can see which items are folders and don't need them artificially at the top (Sort by kind does that if ever I do) and find the integrated alphanumeric list useful for grouping unfiled documents near their folders. When I want the first item(s) on the list to be a folder, I so name it. You can cope, just like you can learn to navigate a new subdivision with all the cul-de-sacs. Now if I could just get used to this silly idea North Americans have that we should drive on the right.
Message was edited by: Ed Hanna
Message was edited by: Ed Hanna

Content sort on merged folders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for