Content vendor is not defined.

Hi, all.
When I try to create a Delivery Unit from the Quick Launch in the Information Modeler, the following error message is shown:
    Cannot create Delivery Unit as content vendor is not defined for this system.
Then, I found the 'content_vendor = UNDEFINED' in the indexserver.ini.
Could you please let me know how I can fix this problem?
Thank you very much,
-mamoru

Hey this solution is not working for me in SP06. The Dev_Guide says I should create a delivery unit in the Livecycle Manager(lm).
The System Vendor in the indexserver.ini is already set correcly.
If I try to create a delivery unit in the livecycle manager there is the following error message:
Has anayone a tip?
Greetings
David

Similar Messages

  • Debliery Units : VENDOR IS NOT DEFINED FOR THIS SYSTEM

    Dear Experts,
    In prespective modeler , tried creating 'DELIVERY UNITS'. However get error message
    "CANNOT CREATE DELIVERY UNIT AS CONTENT VENDOR IS NOT DEFINED FOR THIS SYSTEM" ?
    How can we maintain CONTENT VENDOR ? we are using in-house HANA installation.
    Regards
    Prashant

    Hi Shrikant,
    Please do not reply with your same question in all of the threads which are answered.
    What is the version you are using?
    Where exactly you are unable to see?
    Once you edited the field as mentioned by Jody, it will be in green circle. Also while creating the package, you can see this DU as shown below:
    Regards
    Raj

  • "Content account is not defined" error while trying to checkin a document

    Hi, all
    I am running ECM integration samples included on SDK (included on file ContentIntegrationSuite_10gR3_20081218.zip, folder "oracle-cis-10g\samples\CodeExamples\src\java\com\stellent\cis\sdk\samples"), and I got the error "Content account is not defined. Unable to validate user security." when running the ChekinFile.java sample.
    I could successfully run the ServerInfo.java with no problems, and I expected to run the other example as easily as that.
    Is there any configuration I must change on ECM to run this sample?
    The stack trace follows. Thanks in advance.
    com.stellent.cis.client.command.CommandException: Content item '1256149797205Content-Id-SDK' was not successfully checked in. Content account is not defined. Unable to validate user security.
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.executeRequest(SCSCommand.java:338)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.execute(SCSCommand.java:222)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.command.impl.services.CommandExecutorService.executeCommand(CommandExecutorService.java:57)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.command.impl.CommandFacade.executeCommand(CommandFacade.java:158)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.command.impl.BaseCommandAPI.invokeCommand(BaseCommandAPI.java:84)
         at com.stellent.cis.client.api.scs.document.checkin.impl.SCSDocumentCheckinAPI.checkinFileStream(SCSDocumentCheckinAPI.java:707)
         at com.stellent.cis.sdk.samples.checkin.CheckinFile.execute(CheckinFile.java:87)
         at com.stellent.cis.sdk.samples.checkin.CheckinFile.main(CheckinFile.java:64)
    Caused by: com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.SCSRequestException: Content item '1256149797205Content-Id-SDK' was not successfully checked in. Content account is not defined. Unable to validate user security.
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestProcessor.checkBinderForErrors(SCSRequestProcessor.java:357)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestProcessor.validateResponse(SCSRequestProcessor.java:273)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestProcessor.processRequest(SCSRequestProcessor.java:118)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:61)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.stream.SCSOptimizedPublishFilter.handleRequest(SCSOptimizedPublishFilter.java:128)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.stream.SCSOptimizedRetrieveFilter.handleRequest(SCSOptimizedRetrieveFilter.java:250)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.rewrite.SCSRewriteURLFilter.handleRequest(SCSRewriteURLFilter.java:140)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.cache.impl.SCSServiceCacheFilter.handleRequest(SCSServiceCacheFilter.java:104)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestFilterChain.doRequestFilter(SCSRequestFilterChain.java:58)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.request.impl.SCSRequestExecutorProxy.execute(SCSRequestExecutorProxy.java:105)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.executeViaProxy(SCSCommand.java:353)
         at com.stellent.cis.server.api.scs.impl.SCSCommand.executeRequest(SCSCommand.java:335)
         ... 7 more

    Hi
    Issue is caused with the way parameters are passed from CIS 8.x onwards where when not giving a parameter that is a required one then it has to be set to blank. Like in the case for dDocAccount setting the value to blank string (i.e. "") would successfully check in the document.
    dDocAccount is a required additional paramter that needs to be supplied when checking in contents when UseAccounts=true is set in the config.cfg of the CS.
    From the CS checkin page when not specifying the Account it is set as blank which is why the the checkin goes through fine.
    This was not the case with CIS 7.6.1 where dDocAccount was not required to pass as parameter even if UseAccounts=true is set in the config.
    In case checkins have to be done without giving the Account then add the code for setting the dDocAccount to a blank string (i.e. "") and then recompile the java code and execute the it.
    Reason why CIS 7.6.1 did not show this behaviour is since CIS would set that (the value for account parameter) in the binder and pass it to the CS.
    Hope this helps
    Srinath

  • Vendor is not defined for purchase organization

    Dear Friends,
    I am receiving this message :
    "vendor is not defined for purchase organization "
    What has to do in the system to avoid this message ?
    Regards
    Marco

    Hi,
    This is not a config problem,. so, you have extend the vendor to the respective purchase organization using T-code XK01 - create vendor as follows.
    Type XK01
    Vendor Code :________ (to be given)
    Company Code : ______ (to be given)
    Pur.organization : _____ (to be given)
    Account Group : ______(to be given)
    Reference :
    Vendor code    : ________ ( vendor code given)
    Company code : _______ (company code given)
    Pur.organization : _______(vendor created pur.org code given)
    After fill the above data and press enter key and SAVE. The vendor extended to the respective (under reference data's) purchase organization.
    Hope, it is useful for you.
    Regards,
    K.Rajendran

  • Vendor is not defined in Company code

    I created a vendor and a new material.
    For that material from the above vendor i created a PO and received. Now i am trying to create an invoice. It is giving the following error:
    No master record was created in company code "3000" for vendor number "SUPER".
    The systen gave the Solution as
    "Maintain the vendor master record "SUPER" in company code "3000" or correct the account number."
    Can anyone please tell me how can i do this ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Madhu

    YOu have crreated vendor but not for company code data
    you might have created vendor using MK01
    use xk01 and extend same vendor for company code data then you wont see this error.

  • Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment ?

    We use a Third-Party Vendor to direct-ship some products directly to our Customers.
    When transfers third party order form's PR STO PO, prompts the following information
    Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment
    Message no. 06769
    Diagnosis
    You are entering a purchase transaction involving a vendor to whom a plant has been assigned. Normally, this will involve the transfer of materials from one plant to another.
    This process necessitates a delivery and a billing document in the SD system. The PO appears directly in the delivery due list of the issuing plant (vendor) and therefore does not need to be transmitted.
    However, an item with the procurement form "third-party" (triangular business deal) cannot appear in the delivery due list.
    Procedure
    An item with the procurement form "third-party" can only be ordered from vendors without a plant assignment.
    how should solve?
    Many thanks,  Adny.
    Edited by: Andy Yao on Feb 8, 2010 3:58 AM

    Hi Andy
    Why u doing stock transfer order,in third party sales there is no stock transfer
    Follow below procees for third party sales( Vendor ship materials directly to customer)
    Create Sales order(Use item category TAS) >>> Purachase requisition(Automatically from order) >>> Purchase order >>> Vendor Invoice Verification >>> Invoice to customer
    Kapil

  • Vendor payment doc type KZ looking for account type A which is not defined

    Hi Experts
    We are processing a Vendor payment where discount is received, howeve,  the message "For document type KZ, account type A is not defined'  in the job log.
    Can anyone please put some light on this error.
    Many thanks
    Kind regards
    Dawn

    Hi,
    T-code OBA7: there it is defined which doc. type is allowed to use which acount types.
    SAP standard for KZ is to use vendor + GL account types.
    So check your document that you are going tro post or, if you think its ok, post the same document in a test client and enable doc. type KZ in OBA7 to be used with asset account types to view the result of your posting.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Automatic Payment program: Payment method not defined for vendor abroad

    Hi All,
    I have a situation wherein the client has a company code in Poland . The Company code is trying to make a payment via f110 to a vendor based in sweden. The vendor wants payment to the invoice to be made in Polish Currency i.e. it wants clearing to be done in Company codes local currency.
    But F110 is throwing the error Payment method not defined for vendor abroad. Can you suggest what could be the possible Error.
    Regards
    Nitin

    Nitin,
    Have you followed the above advice, i.e. used the same medium format just allowing foreign payments for it?
    AFAIK, the Poland banks require a separate format for foreign payments, if only because international bank nbr SWIFT has to also be given and not just the IBAN.
    At my company, the Deutsche Bank Poland requested IDocs to be set up instead, I'm working on it now..
    thanks

  • Idoc Status 51 - Vendor not defined in company code

    Hi All
    I'm having an error when performing intercompany stock transfer. The system creates an idoc but unable to post the subsequent document due to the error " VENDOR NOT DEFINED IN COMPANY CODE XXXX"- Status 51.  I have checked over and over ahain but everything looks ok. Could sme1 let me know what I could be missing please
    Thanks a lot
    Edited by: Joe Ujoh on Jul 22, 2008 5:27 PM

    Hi Joe,
    You said you checked everything again and again and is OK; to start with, does the vendor exist in CoCd - pl. check using T code XK03 and see if you have anything in Company Code data.

  • Role VN not defined in master record for vendor 1000000465

    dear alll,
    while preparing PO, with one vendor system is giving the below message and
    when observed the vendor master data,last view vendor partner roles not updated.
    If i go ahead with the same vendor, after giving tax code, taxes tab not getting open to calculate taxes
    Despite,condition records  are there  for the respective condition types with the key combination material,vendor,plant why system is not picking taxes?
    Role VN not defined in master record for vendor 1000000465
    Message no. ME329
    Diagnosis
    The vendor may only operate as a partner for other vendors (e.g. as ordering address or invoicing party), not as the vendor who actually fulfills the order.
    Procedure
    u2022     If this is a warning message, you can ignore it.
    u2022     If this is an error message add partner role VN to the vendor master record:
    Perform function
    some times taxes getting calculated properly but in print priew, tax related informaton(values) missing.
    what might be the possible reason? please suggest the way

    Message no. ME329
    Check these threads
    [Re: steps to create PO for service order |Re: steps to create PO for service order]
    [How to change the wording of System Messages?|How to change the wording of System Messages?]
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • What does "Locations for this vendor not defined" - mean and how do I eliminate it

    A local restaurant sent me an e-mail with the statement " To receive your special birthday gift click here." When I do I get white screen with the sentence - "Locations for this vendor not defined". What does this mean and how do I eliminate or continue since I now can only go back to the e-mail. Using Firefox with AT&T Yahoo & Windows XP me

    Hello.
    Does this happen on other browsers (Internet Explorer, for example) or is it specific to Firefox?

  • Message no. ME021: One-time vendor not defined

    Hi guys,
    I create a vendor without problem, but when i try to create a purchase info-record, here is the message i have.
    One-time vendor not defined
    Message no. ME021
    Diagnosis
    It does not make sense to allow a one-time vendor in this situation.
    Procedure
    Check the vendor number you entered.
    Can somebody have an idea of what i can do, i'm still a beginner, so if you need more information let me know.
    Thanks'

    if this starts all of a sudden, then something must have happened in your system.
    maybe someone modified coding, maybe someone implemented OSS notes and this is is a side effect.  maybe it was just a customizing change (which I dont know) .
    I woulod just check the transports done between the date were it worked succesully and the date it started with the porblem.
    Check the transports made to your system in SE10 (click the binocluar button there to get a selection screen to search for transports)

  • Vendor X in  not defined in Company code  Y

    Hi Guys,
    I did the setting in OBYA (intercompany settings) for the two company codes X and Y. However, when I am psoting the doc by FB01 getting the error
    "Vendor X in  not defined in Company code  Y". In OBYA, it show the setting.
    thnks

    hi,
    getting this error. What to do
    Consolidated companies 64 and 000065 are different
    Message no. F5080
    Diagnosis
    The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
    If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.

  • PR: Procurement w/o material from vendor with plant assignment not defined

    Hi,
    Getting the error message:  06806 - Procurement w/o material from vendor with plant assignment not defined
    while creating the PR with account assingment (P- project) & without material no. instead entering the short text in the PR.
    this issue (Error message) is getting to only one user.
    question-1:  Is it possible to set the Error messages to the user specific. Because other users are able to create the PR with the above inputs, but the one user is not able to create instead getting the above E- Msg.
    question-2: Is it possible to set the messages to Plant specific instead quesiton -1 or both
    Or else, please let me know how to deactivate the above E-msg to the specific user.
    Please do the needful asap.
    Regards,
    Sapsrin

    Hi,
    As you noticed, note 856962 has changed the system behaviour
    when you are working with procurement w/o material from vendor with
    plant assignment.
    Items without a material master record can only be ordered from vendors
    without a plant assignment.
    This note will stop your users from creating service purchase orders
    for a vendor who has a Plant assigned in the vendor master, issuing
    the error message 06 806.
    you can check the below code:-
    LMEPOF23
      IF ekpo-ematn IS INITIAL AND
          (  aktyp EQ hin OR ekko-reswk NE oekko-reswk  OR      "856962
         (  aktyp EQ hin OR NOT ekko-reswk IS INITIAL OR        "856962
            ekko-bsakz NE oekko-bsakz OR
            gf_extended_check NE space ).
        PERFORM enaco_2(sapfmmex) USING '06' '806'.
    regards,
    Lalita

  • Procurement w/o material from vendor with plant assignment not defined

    While creating  standard Framework Order (FO)   asset  PO  I am getting the below error
    "procurement w/o material from vendor with plant assignment not defined"
    Plz Help
    Regards

    Dear INDRANIL BHATTA ,
         Thanks for your reply and your soluation ,
    Finally , I found Vendor Master assignment to plant so it can't create FO PO .
    ->  XK02 -> selecting "purchasing data" >Extras>Add.Purchasing data.

Maybe you are looking for