Continuity Not Compatible with Enterprise Networks?

I upgraded my MBP (15" Retina) to OS X Yosemite today in the hopes of gaining access to the continuity/handoff features. However, after checking all my settings on all my devices, I cannot manage to use the feature.
On my MacBook
-I have enabled Handoff in the General Settings
-I have enabled Bluetooth
-I am signed into my iCloud account
-I am connected to the Wi-Fi network of my university (enterprise network)
On my iPhone
-I am currently running iOS 8.0.2 on an iPhone 6 Plus
-I have enabled Handoff in the General Settings
-I have signed in to my iCloud account
-I have enabled Bluetooth and connected to the same Wi-Fi network
Are the continuity features simply not compatible with enterprise networks? My university (like most) has campus-wide wireless service, so I do not have/need a router. Or do I need to wait until iOS 8.1 to use these features. Some help would be appreciated.

Yes , I know that. Nevertheless, SeaMonkey was not certified with 10.2.0.5 but running without problems.
The question is: Has anyone of you guys found a trick to get SeaMonkey running with Grid 11gR1 ?

Similar Messages

Firefox is not campatible with F5 Networks Host Plugin and I need it to run a remote website

Firefox is not compatible with F5 Networks Host Plugin and I need it to run a remote website

Do these hotfixes help you? http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/12000/700/sol12757.html

I am getting error message "iTunes could not back up the iPhone because the backup was corrupt or not compatible with the iPhone". I have deleted the backup and restarted my computer, but continue to get this error message. What do I need to do now?

I have recently updated my phone and am attempting to sync it. I got the error message "iTunes could not back up the iPhone because the backup was corrupt or not compatible with the iPhone". I deleted the backup, restarted my computer, and even restored the iPhone, but continue to get the same error message. What do I need to do now?

iTunes places the iPhone backup in the following location. Navigate there & delete everything in the backup folder, but not the folder itself. You will have to turn on "Show All Hidden Files & Folders" to see it:
Mac:~/Library/Application Support/MobileSync/Backup/
Windows XP:\Documents and Settings\(username)\Application Data\Apple Computer\MobileSync\Backup\
Windows Vista and Windows 7:\Users\(username)\AppData\Roaming\Apple Computer\MobileSync\Backup\

Workstation 11.1, Tools 9.9.2 build-2496486: Not compatible with GCC 5.1.0 on linux (Arch, Debian, Ubuntu, etc)

First, there are some compilation problems with the latest linux kernel and Tools 9.9.2's source of vmhgfs: vmhgfs module not compilable for VMware Tools 9.9.0 (Fusion7.1) after Ubuntu Linux kernel update to 3.13.0-46-generic (Febr. 2015) (Shared Folder Feature not working in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Guest) on MacOSX Yosemite (Host))?
In short, you have to patch the source to get it to compile: rasa/vmware-tools-patches · GitHub
Arch linux is a "rolling" distro, meaning we always have latest - and are usually the first to find problems before it trickles down to Ubuntu, Mint, Debian and other Linux distros. Well, now there is a serious problem that is unresolvable.
The vmhgfs source is not compatible with linux kernels built with gcc 5.1.0. It hard locks the VM, requiring a hard reset when the kernel module loads. It also hard locks during vmware-tools-install.pl torwards the very end when it says, "Guest filesystem driver" enabling. And on boot, it is vmhgfs that is being loaded when the VM hard locks.
I was able to get around this earlier when gcc 4.9.2 was in core - i just rebuilt the kernel under 4.9.2: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=196915
Obviously that isn't a long-term solution. But now that gcc 5.1.0 has been pushed out to core, that means recompiling the kernel under 4.9.2 is no easy feat since dependencies now depend on gcc 5.1.0.
@Developers: We have a big problem with VMware Tools vmhgfs and kernels compiled under gcc 5.1.0. Given it make take years before the Debian distros get the latest and greatest, it's coming.
Because of this, and the wasted time in me having to support this mess, I may recommend to my company we no longer continue with our Enterprise account of 100 licenses of Workstation and Fusion. It is obvious in the previous thread vmhgfs module not compilable for VMware Tools 9.9.0 (Fusion7.1) after Ubuntu Linux kernel update to 3.13.0-46-generic (Febr. 2015) (Shared Folder Feature not working in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Guest) on MacOSX Yosemite (Host))? that VMware is no hurry to resolve even the simple build errors that the community has resolved last year with patches. Good thing too, renewal comes up in two months.
I shiver to think how long it will take VMware to release a fix for gcc 5.1.0.

Additional info...
The hard lock is a panic when mounting the /mnt/hgfs partition, which is what is configured in my fstab:
.host:/
/mnt/hgfs
vmhgfs
defaults
0 0
The reason the above is just "./host:/" is for the auto-mounting of shares on the fly, or all shares on boot. Specifying a share doesn't change anything.
Even mounting it manually panic's the kernel:
mount -n -t vmhgfs .host:/<shared_folder> /home/user1/shares
Again, this all worked fine with a kernel built on 4.9.2, but not 5.1.0.

Windows desktop application -- version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running

I am developing on 64-bit Windows7 Enterprise using VisualStudio 2013. I created a new Windows desktop VB.net application and just created a release build of the default solution/project targeting "Any CPU". I provided the EXE to a
colleague who is also running 64-bit Windows7 Enterprise but receives the following error...
"The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running. Check your computer's system information to see
whether you need an x86 (32-bit) or x64 (64-bit) version of the program, and then contact the software publisher."
I changed the build configuration to create a "x86" build but my colleague received the same error. Any ideas why this would be happening (I checked and my colleague has .Net4 Framework installed as well)? Thank you for your time and
response!
Sunish Abraham
"The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running.
Check your computer's system information to see whether you need an x86 (32-bit) or x64 (64-bit) version of the program, and then contact the software publisher."

Hi sunisha,
According to your description, you'd like to run the application in your colleague's computer.
I provided the EXE to a colleague who is also running 64-bit Windows7 Enterprise but receives the following error...
If you want to test the application, you could provide the whole Debug folder to colleague instead of the single exe.
"The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running. Check your computer's system information to see whether you need an x86 (32-bit) or x64 (64-bit) version of the program, and then contact the software publisher."
Check if the collegue's computer is running 64-bit windows:
Enter Control Panel, click on System and Security.
Under this, you can view the system type. This will describe whether you have 32-bit or 64-bit.
You can also try compatiblity mode.
If the program is not compatible, then you may try to install and run the program in compatibility mode.
Use the following steps:
1)   Right click on the Program
2)   Click on Properties
3)   Click on Compatibility tab
4)   Select Run this program in compatibility mode and select Windows Vista or whatever operating system the program was running successfully.
And if you still have questions, I suggest you deploy the application to the Local Network with clickOnce, then your collegue can install the application from the network.
#ClickOnce deployment
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/t71a733d(VS.80).aspx
And also, you could recreate a new small application in your computer in Any CPU, then check if this small new application can work well in your colleague's computer. This can judge if the problem is caused by your application.
If you have any other concern regarding this issue, please feel free to let me know.
Best regards,
Youjun Tang
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Mail Reinstall Not Compatible With 10.6.8

I reinstalled Mail from my Snow Leopard installation DVD and now i get a message saying that the current version (4.2) is not compatible with 10.6.8. I tried running the software update utility but it did not find an update for me. Is there any way to get the latest version of Mail for 10.6.8?
Thanks
Carey

Nor can I. Something you did or did not do is at the root of your problem. I have no idea what that is because I don't know what actually preceded this. I've had this happen many times with different applications and have never had a complication fixing it.
I can only suggest doing the following in hope this will work for you.
1. Move the Mail application to the Trash (do not Empty.)
2. Boot from the Snow Leopard DVD then:
Repair the Hard Drive and Permissions
After the installer loads select your language and click on the Continue button. When the menu bar appears select Disk Utility from the Utilities menu. After DU loads select your hard drive entry (mfgr.'s ID and drive size) from the the left side list. In the DU status area you will see an entry for the S.M.A.R.T. status of the hard drive. If it does not say "Verified" then the hard drive is failing or failed. (SMART status is not reported on external Firewire or USB drives.) If the drive is "Verified" then select your OS X volume from the list on the left (sub-entry below the drive entry,) click on the First Aid tab, then click on the Repair Disk button. If DU reports any errors that have been fixed, then re-run Repair Disk until no errors are reported. If no errors are reported click on the Repair Permissions button. Wait until the operation completes, then quit DU.
If DU reports errors it cannot fix, then you will need Disk Warrior and/or Tech Tool Pro to repair the drive. If you don't have either of them or if neither of them can fix the drive, then you will need to reformat the drive and reinstall OS X.
3. Reinstall Snow Leopard:
If the drive is OK then quit DU and return to the installer. Proceed with reinstalling OS X. Note that the Snow Leopard installer will not erase your drive or disturb your files. After installing a fresh copy of OS X the installer will move your Home folder, third-party applications, support items, and network preferences into the newly installed system.
Go to the Applications folder and verify there is a new Mail program installed, but do not attempt to run it.
4. Download and install Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo v1.1.
5. Open Software Update and install any additional updates shown.
This will take some time to accomplish, but hopefully will return you to normal.

Express 802.11n model A1264 not compatible with Mountain Lion?

I have an airport Express 802.11n model A1264. I have been using it with Mountain Lion for a couple of months. Some problems but it worked. Last nite it stopped. - flashing orange light. I am using Airport Utility version 6.1. The helpful? lady at apple support said that model of Airport Express (Gen 1 ) was not compatable with Mountain Lion and I need to get a Generation 2 Airport Express. Is there any other solution?

Hardware failure is a possibility but your Express is most certainly compatible with your version of Mac OS X.
weaversue wrote:
... I had pushed in the reset button on the AU Express -
To properly reset it to factory defaults requires that you depress its reset button continuously for about five seconds - long enough for the LED to flash rapidly, then release it.
After this the Express will create an open wireless network called "Apple Network nnnnnn" where nnnnnn = a set of characters unique to your Express.
Connect to that network by selecting it in the menu.
Launch AirPort Utility. It should find the Express.
If you are still having trouble unplug the Express and plug in to an electrical outlet near your iMac. Not only does this make it easier to perform another "hard reset" should you need to, it minimizes the potential for wireless interference to prevent communication. There is no need to have it connected to your modem as you configure it.
Only after doing all this should you begin to suspect the Express has simply failed. In that case bring it back to Apple for a final determination.
Don't let them tell you it is not compatible with Mountain Lion because I use the exact same one all the time. Even its preceding model is compatible.

Photoshop CS2: "file not compatible with this version of Photoshop" error

So, I've been working with Photoshop for almost 20 years now, and lately I've been getting this error message on occasion (but not on every file) when I go to open a file I worked on just yesterday: "Could not complete your request because the file is not compatible with this version of Photoshop." I just worked on it yesterday in Photoshop. The file was saved as a PSD, and when I attempt to open it through Painter IX, that program tells me that it's not a Photoshop document. Why can't I open this file anymore, and why is it giving me this error message when I don't have Norton AntiVirus installed, and my 'maximize PSD and PSB file compatibility' is set to 'always'??
Does anyone have an idea on how I can open my file? How can I get around this, and how do I prevent it from happening again?
OS: OSX 10.4.11
Photoshop CS2
Info:
Kind: Adobe Photoshop file
Size: 394.4MB
Created: December 13, 2007
Modified: Yesterday at 3:54 PM

This is the boilerplate text I use in connection to saving to a network (please NOTE the part where it explains that normally, it does work, but that it is impossible to troubleshoot someone else's network remotely, and that's why it's not supported by Adobe):
If you are opening files over a network or saving them to a network server, please
cease and desist immediately
in the event you are currently experiencing problems with one or more files.
Working across a network is not supported.
See:
http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/322391.html
Copy the
CLOSED file from your server to your local hard disk, work on it, save it again to your local hard disk, close it, and copy the closed file back to the server.
Of course, the fact that Adobe does not support working across a network does not necessarily mean it won't work. It should.
Adobe's position is that there are too many variables in a network environment for them to guarantee that everything will work correctly in every network, especially given the fact that if something does
not work properly, it's probably the network's fault, and Adobe has no way of troubleshooting your network.
If you can't work locally, you are on your own, and if something happens, you're on your own. If you must work from a server, make sure your network administrator is a competent professional.
When problems arise, a lot of valuable work can be lost.

Problem connecting to internet via Firefox as XUL Runner Error Platform version is not compatible with minVersion 1.9.2.16 max version 1.9.2.16

Firfox requested to update previous version to new version of which i allowed. After installation complete i tried to connect to the internet and was denied with a following error window appearing. As explained above i shall explain again as shown in the error window.
XULRunner
Error: Platform version " is not compatible with
minVersion >= 1.9.2.16
maxVersion<= 1.9.2.16
This will not allow me to connect to the internet as i would like to continue to.
Please restore if possible my previous toolbar and able for me to connect to the internet.
Thank you.

This issue can happen when the updater wasn't able to update all files in the Firefox program folder.
Do a clean (re-)install:
* Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 4.0: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all.html
* Firefox 3.6.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version and remove the Firefox program folder before installing that copy of the Firefox installer.
* Don't remove personal data if you uninstall the current version.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere (not in the Firefox program folder) and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.

OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0

Im trying to start the database enterprise manager and I get this error on the log file:
OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0 Repository needs to be patched.
Database version is 11.2
O.S. version is: Linux 2.6.9-78.0.0.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Jul 25 14:41:56 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I use this to upload database and console:
export ORACLE_HOME=/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
export ORACLE_BASE=/opt/oracle/
export ORACLE_SID=orcl
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/lsnrctl start
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/dbstart /opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/emctl start dbconsole
when I excecute that, I see this on the console:
Oracle Enterprise Manager 11g Database Control Release 11.2.0.1.0
Copyright (c) 1996, 2009 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
https://192.168.2.210:1158/em/console/aboutApplication
Starting Oracle Enterprise Manager 11g Database Control ........... started.
Logs are generated in directory /opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/machine_one_lega/sysman/log
So I try to go there, and the web browser shows this:
503 Service Unavailable
Service is not initialized correctly. OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0.
Can you help me find this solution?
thanks

Hi Ingenio,
This problem sometimes occur when the listener is not running, hence connection cannot be done without listener.

Error :"The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client"

Hi guys!
I'm facing this problem:
When my .Net application tries to access the DB, I get this error message above.
The application is into the same machine of DB and the operational system is Windows Server Enterprise 64 bits.
I'm comparing to another machine that has the same scenario but runs in Windows Vista 64 bits. This problem doesn't happen and I can normally access the DB.
The both database versions are 10g Release 2 (10.2) and all components from Oracle Database Components 10.2.0.2.21 are installed as the containing bellow:
-Oracle Data Provider for .NET 1.x 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Data Provider for .NET 2.0 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET 2003 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio 2005 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Provider for OLE DB 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Objects for OLE 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Services For Microsoft Transaction Server 10.2.0.1.0
-Oracle Net 10.2.0.1.0
-Oracle Universal Installer 10.2.0.2.0
Oracle.DataAcces.DLL is 2.102.2.20 and it is reference in my .Net app (that is published and located into IIS).
These are the Oracle assemblies installes in 'C:\Windows\Assembly':
Windows Vista Machine:
ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.Management.Omo 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Oracle.VsDevTools 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Windows Server Machine:
ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHT 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHS 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 ko 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 jp 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
What should I check and do to solve this problems?
Thanks for help,
Anderson

Hi,
Often the error "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client" is raised when the unmanaged dll OraOpsX.dll can't be found, can't be loaded, or is the wrong version. For version 10.2.0.x of ODP.NET and .NET Framework 2.x the file should be called "OraOps10w.dll" and should be found in the %ORACLE_HOME%\bin directory.
Since the ODAC pieces are installed on the same host as the database, are they in a separate Oracle Home or the same Oracle Home as the database software? If there are multiple Oracle Home directories, which one is in the system path first?
I would start with verifying the version of OraOps10w.dll and the system path on the server. You might also confirm that the Oracle Home directory (and everything under it) has the following permissions for Authenticated Users:
- Read & Execute
- List folder contents
- Read
Regards,
Mark

RCVCAT database is not compatible with this version of RMAN

I am getting the below error while trying to configure rman catalog datababse.
rman target prod_dba/Pass1234@proddb catalog cat_dba/Pass1234@catdb
Recovery Manager: Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Copyright (c) 1995, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: TESTDB (DBID=2409515669)
connected to recovery catalog database
recovery catalog is not installed
RMAN>
RMAN> register database;
recovery catalog is not installed
recovery catalog is not installed
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of register command at 07/20/2007 19:05:40
RMAN-06429: RCVCAT database is not compatible with this version of RMAN
RMAN>
And Oracle version is same in proddb and catdb
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 9.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
any inputs...
Thanks.

Hi,
when upgrading catalog am getting the error like,
error occurred in source file: krmk.pc, line: 6986
text of failing SQL statement: ╠≥`☺
ORACLE error from recovery catalog database: ORA-00942: table or view does not e
xist
error occurred in source file: krmk.pc, line: 6986
text of failing SQL statement: ╠≥`☺
ORACLE error from recovery catalog database: ORA-00942: table or view does not e
xist
error occurred in source file: krmk.pc, line: 6986
text of failing SQL statement:µ`☺
ORACLE error from recovery catalog database: ORA-00942: table or view does not e
xist
Whether i need to run catpath.sql etc on the db?

CS6 file "not compatible with this version of Photoshop"

We are using Adobe Creative Suit 6. Yesterday i've created a file, and today i cannot open it with any software. (Bridge shows the thumbnail but the file is corrupted.) I get the "Could not complete your request because the file is not compatible with this version of Photoshop" error. The file contains multiple layers, without any masks. Originally it was a NEF file (Nikon raw). I used vanishing point, because its an interior photo. (it doesnt relevant for the problem) I have an earlier version, where the vanishing points are defined, but the textures are missing. Main question is, how this can be??? I worked on that version for more than 2 hours. The file size is small, it's only 133.579.959 bytes (133 Mb). The image is 4288 x 2848 px, 240 DPI, RGB 8-Bit, Fogra39 ICC profile. The computer is up to date, nor the hw or the softwares are corrupted. The file saved locally, so it's not a network problem. I saved the document, and left the machine for about 15 minutes, then i went back, so the save had to be complete. (on SSD it took about a couple of secs) The biggest problem is, i have to work with a large amount of photos in Photoshop. But after this i have some bad feelings about this job. We have to create these PSD files both for ourselves and for our client for further use. (It's a huge furniture factory) The hardware has 16 gigs of RAM with an Intel i5 operating system Windows 8.1. Any ideas? (ps.: i didnt' find PSErrorlog.txt file) Oh i almost forgot. After installing CS6 my Adobe Acrobat Pro stopped working in about 2 weeks... So. The job is waiting, but we cannot wait for a long time, we gonna loose our biggest client because of a sw error?

You write this is not compatible with this version. Did you install all updates and did you update the camera raw too?

ADF from JDeveloper 10.1.2 not compatible with iAS 9.0.1

Hi,
We developed an ADF Application with JDeveloper 10.1.2 and we use the ADF interMedia domains (e.g. oracle.ord.im.OrdDocDomain). The application runs fine in JDeveloper, but doesn't run on our iAS 9.0.4.1. We get the following exception:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/sql/DatumWithConnection
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:219)
at oracle.jbo.common.java2.JDK2ClassLoader.loadClassForName(JDK2ClassLoader.java:38)
at oracle.jbo.common.JBOClass.forName(JBOClass.java:161)
at oracle.jbo.common.JBOClass.findDataClass(JBOClass.java:203)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.initFromXML(AttributeDefImpl.java:2061)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.loadFromXML(AttributeDefImpl.java:2013)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadAttribute(EntityDefImpl.java:2815)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadAttributes(EntityDefImpl.java:2779)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadFromXML(EntityDefImpl.java:2362)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadFromXML(EntityDefImpl.java:2106)
at oracle.jbo.server.MetaObjectManager.loadFromXML(MetaObjectManager.java:514)
[...rest of stacktrace omitted ...]
The problem is that the JDBC version of the iAS 9.0.4.1 is missing the class DatumWithConnection that is indirectly referenced by the interMedia classes supplied with JDeveloper 10.1.2.
In detail, oracle.ord.im.OrdDoc uses oracle.sql.STRUCT. The inheritance hierarchy of STRUCT is different in the JDBC versions on iAS 9.0.4.1 (oracle.sql.Datum <- oracle.sql.STRUCT) and JDeveloper 10.1.2 (oracle.sql.Datum <- oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection <- oracle.sql.STRUCT). The class file of oracle.ord.im.OrdDoc (from 10.1.2. JDeveloper) was apparently compiled the new JDBC driver version since it contains a reference to oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection. And that class cannot be found if run on iAS 9.0.4.1 with its old JDBC version.
I think this is a very serious problem, since it means that ADF from JDeveloper 10.1.2 is not compatible with iAS 9.0.4.1, in contradiction to the support matrix (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/collateral/papers/10g/as_supportmatrix.html).
Upgrading the JDBC Driver on the iAS seems to be the only clean solution for this problem (we also tried using old versions of the ordim.jar etc. but that always leads to other problems). But simply exchanging the JDBC jar-files on the server breaks the Enterprise Manager on our iAS installation.
I have two questions:
1) Is there a recommended workaround for the compatibility issue described above?
2) Is there a documented and supported way to upgrade the JDBC driver of iAS 9.0.4.1? I searched OTN and MetaLink and haven't found anything about this.
Kind Regards,
Kay
P.S. It is surprising that this problem is rarely mentioned in the OTN forums at all. The only relevant thread is on the JHeadstart Forum:
JHeadstart Deployment Issue
P.S.2
More info on what we tested:
We have thoroughly checked that the 10.1.2. ADF runtime was correctly deployed on our iAS 9.0.4.1. We installed a OC4J 9.0.4.0.0 standalone on the same linux machine as our iAS 9.0.4.1 and deployed our application on it, getting the same error (java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/sql/DatumWithConnection) as on the iAS. Replacing the JDBC drivers of the OC4J standalone with the version that came with JDeveloper 10.1.2 solved the problem.

I don't think that mixing classes from different jar file is a good idea. Nevertheless, we tested this approach already. Adding the DatumWithConnection.class from the 10.1.0.3.0 JDBC version to the jar file of the original JDBC version (of the iAS 9.0.4.1.0) caused a java.lang.VerifyError to appear.
The DatumWithConnection class is not simply added in the newer JDBC version. It is inserted into the inheritance hierarchy of oracle.sql.STRUCT and oracle.sql.Datum. Simply providing the new class next to the old JDBC driver will not work.
To give more information about what's wrong with updating the complete JDBC driver, I justed tested it again. To update the JDBC driver I stopped the server, changed the contents of jdbc/lib, started the server. I tried it with JDBC Version 9.2.0.5 as well as 10.1.0.3.0.
In both cases, our own application works, i.e. no more NoClassDefFoundError caused by oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection.
The Enterprise Manager shows strange behaviour, however. Some features work as usual but, for example, when I click on the "Applications" tab for our OC4J instance, we just get the following error shown in the browser:
An error was encountered while loading page. Failed to initialize configuration management user session.. See base exception for details.
Root Cause: TDU
Resolution: See base exception for details.. TDU
In one of the server logs I found the following stacktrace:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: TDU
     at oracle.net.resolver.NavDescription.navigate(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.NavServiceAlias.navigate(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAddrTree(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAndExecute(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.establishConnection(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.connect(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.connect(TTC7Protocol.java:1777)
     at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.logon(TTC7Protocol.java:215)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.<init>(OracleConnection.java:365)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.getConnectionInstance(OracleDriver.java:547)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:347)
     at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:512)
     at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:171)
     at oracle.context.isearch.admin.users.InstanceManager.getSchemaConnection(InstanceManager.java:688)
     at test.admin__status._jspService(_admin__status.java:112)
     at com.orionserver[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(OrionHttpJspPage.java:56)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:349)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:509)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:413)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:765)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:317)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:793)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:208)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:125)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:192)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Kind Regards,
Kay

RMAN-06429: TARGET database is not compatible with this version of RMAN

he Hi,
how can i solve this issue . how i will upgrade the Rman. My production database details are below
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
while i'm configuring rman i'm getting below error . please help me.
C:\Documents and Settings\vj.dcruz>rman target / catalog rman01/rman01@upp
Recovery Manager: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Sep 14 08:18:02 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Recovery Manager incompatible with TARGET database: RMAN 8.0.4.0 to 10.2.0.0 required
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00554: initialization of internal recovery manager package failed
RMAN-06429: TARGET database is not compatible with this version of RMAN
rgds,
john

Johnvd wrote:
Hi Hemant,
i'm doing same thing login 10.2.0.0 database and configure the rman but while connect target its saying that my Recovery Manager: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Sep 14 09:04:59 2011
how its happening is there any where i have to change the path.
Regards,
johnJohn, you need to use the RMAN binary which is located in bin folder of Oracle Database (ie /u01/oracle/product/10.2/db1/bin). You shouldn't use "rman which comes with Oracle 11g client".
If you are using windows, run the following commands in command prompt and then copy/paste the output:
echo 5ORACLE_HOME%
echo %PATH%
If you are using unix, run the following commands in terminal and then copy/paste the output:
echo $ORACLE_HOME
echo $PATH
Regards
Gokhan

Continuity Not Compatible with Enterprise Networks?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for