Contract creation at Building level

Hi,
I am trying to create a RE contract at BU level, for this i have assigned IB value at necessary contract type and system is permitting the assignment of BU in RE contract, but when I go on saving the contract system throws the error that Rental object does not exist.
The error code is RECAAP061.
Any inputs on how to correct the error and create a contract at BU level?
Regards
Rohit

Hi Rohit,
I am wondering that you get the error that the rental object does not exist although you have not assigned a rental object at all.
Is there also an object number shown in the error message? If yes, does it refer to a rental object or is it the number of the building that you assigned?
In general it is possible to create contracts that have no rental objects assigned, it only depends on the settings for the contract type used.
Which type of contracts are concerned (lease-in, lease-out, internal or external)?
Which contract reference is assigned in customizing for the contract type?
Regards,
Franz

Similar Messages

  • SRM 7.01 Backend Contracts creation with XI/PI ESOA Service

    Hello, we are implementing SRM 7.01 PPS with Extended Classic Scenario. We need to create contracts backend contracts ( ECC) from RFX RESPONSE at SRM. As we have ECC 6.0 EHP 5 we have to use Esoa services. The problem is that we have set up PI but no contract is created at ECC ( not even in SRM) when we pressed button "  create contracts" from rfx response even thought the message at SRM is " contracts XXXXXX created" I think we are missing some customizing in ECC.
    We have already implemented badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
    I read note 1268821 who explains that we have to activate business function LOG_MM_P2PSE_1 in ECC but I think this only apply for "CENTRAL CONTRACTS" and we dont want to use central contracts. We just want to creates contracts at ECC from rfx response in SRM. I couldn´t find any documentation about this, just for Central Contracts or backend contracts creation (through idocs) . Any idea?
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Best Regards
    Liam

    The first interface that try to get out from SRM was " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1", thus based on this interface we made the configuration on PI. So, after pressing button " create contract" on srm if we execute tx SXI_MONITOR in SRM we found the interface " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1" and in the backend system ( ECC) at tv SXI_MONITOR we found interface PurchasingContractERPRequest_In_V1 for this contract with black and white flag ( processed successfully) but no contract created in ECC not even SRM.
    Anyway we have checked that inbound proxy  is executed but we dont see any contract created
    Is this the right Interface? We are missing something?
    Best regads and thanks again for your help!

  • FM for Updating Installation date in Contracts + sales orders Item level

    Hi
    Plesae give any FM for Updating Installation date in Contracts + sales orders Item level for contracts tab.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vishnuvardhan....

    Have used the billing transaction to set a Default Billing date at time of blling.

  • Waring messages for PO Date in the contract creation?

    Hi Friends,
    Expecting answers with some functional knowledge,
    I am developing one webservice to create value contract from dotnet front end,
    So user can enter inputs from that front end and he will get SAP generated value contract id.
    Here I did validations for all the fields and giving error messages to restrict user to dont give incorrect values.
    Now coming to my issue..,
    While entering the PO Date in the initial screen of contract creation,
    If I enter future date,
    The purchase order date lies in the future. Please check
    If I enter the past date.,
    The purchase order date is in the past. Please check
    I will get warning messages like this, so what should i do, I can enter, today's date to avoid these messages,
    And I can neglect these two messages to proceed, as they are warings only.
    But in my case , Can i process these messages to front end, Is it mandatory.
    I want to know the intention of these messages, then i will take good decision on this...,
    Thanks,
    Naveen.I

    Hi..,
       Thanks for your attention..,
    After consulting some people on this issue, I got that..,
    Mostly PO Date is current date, but in the case of purchage receiving process is late then the date may be in past..,
    Similerly, because of some business reason we can create contract before receiving of purchage order, where order should
    must get, in this case user can enter future date.
    So as if it is not special case user creates contrat with po date as current date, system gives some warning!!
    Better to pass this messages to front end if we are using webservices or some thing like other technolgies.
    welcome to other comments on this..
    Thanks,
    Naveen.I

  • SRM contract creation date

    Hi, y'all
    Reckon where contract creation date is in SRM?  What table is it on?
    I've Googled and Googled.  Can't find a clue.
    Any documentation on the tables in SRM?
    Thanks.

    Hi Perry,
    How about table CRMD_ORDERADM_H?
    You should be able to find the creation date time of SRM document in this table.
    Please let me know if I have any misunderstanding of your query.
    Best regards,
    Wendy

  • MWST condition type missing in contract creation,VA41

    Hi, got a problem here during contract creation. I can't get the MWST show up in the contract condition tab. Analysis result :
    010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)
    Error Message : Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWST is missing
    Things I have done :
    a) checked pricing procedure V/08
    b) created condition records VK11
    c) checked customer tax classification : Liable for taxes
    d) checked material tax data : Full tax
    e) ???
    what else did I miss out?
    Thanks
    Andy

    Option 1: If you do not want MWST condition as mandatory, then remove the check from check box in the pricing procedure (T.Code: V/08). MWST is tax condition & Tax condition are normally not mandatory, as it may vary according to Business Requirement.
    Option 2: <b>"010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)"</b>: Check the access sequence maintained for Condition Type MWST (T.Code": V/06). Next, Check the Access Sequence & the access 010 assigned to it. (T.Code:V/07). Check whether Accesses & fields are assigned correctly.
    Option 3: Instead of maintaining condition record for access 010, maintain for different combination & check the result. Even in my case, once the access with reference to tax classification did not give desired result, but was achieved bu maintaining another combination.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

  • IDOC transfer during Contract Creation

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement with the contract creation in SRM contract management.
    Do you Know which IDOCs is/are transmitted to the ERP during a contract creation?
    Thanks in Advance!
    Martin.

    Hi Martin,
    To add further to Claudia's note, Message Types "BLAORD" & "COND_A" are set-up in ECC as incoming. There is no Mesage Type set-up for these (as OUTBOUND) on SRM side.
    In SRM, Message Type "BLAREL" should be set-up as INBOUND. This carries the release information for the contract from ECC to SRM.
    Cheers,
    Akash

  • Setting the Member & data build level dynamically

    Hello, I have got a situation where i need to set the Member & data build level dynamically based on the member. The option "Build Multidimensional down to here"(OLAPMetaoutline Menu)can be used,But when we use this option i could not perform my task as i need set the Build level dynamically based on the member level.I have to set the level dynamically for the following instance.Suppose My time dimension hierarchy is as follows: BY Year BY Quarter By Month If the year is say 1995,then quarter level & month level data is not required. If the year is say 1998,then quarter level & month level data is required. Could anyone provide a solution for dynamically setting the Member & data build level? Thanks,Sathyan

    Hi CTS,
    Thanks for ur repply,
    My source side i am having BANK_BRANCH_STATUS table has BRANCH_CODE and EOC_STATUS(possible values for this column is 'N','T','F','E' & 'B').
    The source table from which data has to tranform will be having BRANCH_CODE.
    i made odiwaitfordata as 1st step in package ,in this step the code looks like this
    OdiWaitForData "-CONTEXT=GLOBAL" "-GLOBAL_ROWCOUNT=1" "-LSCHEMA=ORACLE_FCSAILS" "-POLLINT=1000" "-RESUME_KEY_OPERATOR==" "-SQLFILTER=EOC_STATUS='E'" "-TIMEOUT=0" "-TIMEOUT_WITH_ROWS_OK=YES" "-UNIT_ROWCOUNT=>=1" "-INCREMENT_DETECTION=NO" "-TABLE_NAME=BANK_BRANCH_STATUS" "-OBJECT_TYPE=T"
    In the procedure,
    Source command-select branch_CODE from BANK_BRANCH_STATUS WHERE EOC_STATUS='E'
    Target command- Execute scenario for batch with branchid as a parameter... how to put up this in code form....could u suggest me?
    3) flag those which are executed so you don't wait for them again --how to put up this in code form....could u suggest me?
    Please sugest me,
    Thanks,
    MNK

  • Payment method in Contract Creation

    Hi,
    Was just wondering why the payment method i entered during contract creation (Goto > Header > Financial Accounting > Pmnt method) does not kick in during payment run. What happens is that the payment method defined in the master record is being used instead of the one i indicated. Kindly advise. Thanks.

    Hi,
    This is because when you are trying to release the Contract using OR......system first search for payment method u have assigned for the particular material assigned to particular contract customer.
    If nothing is available there only than system picks payment method from the contract.
    Hope it helps.
    Raj

  • Multiple contract creation in ECC from a single GOA

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on a solution regarding to GOA in SRM - Contract in ECC creation and i am wondering about the following scenario:
    Create 1 GOA in SRM 5.0 for a central/global purchasing organization and when the appropriate BADI going to transfer it into ECC, it creates contracts for all company codes.
    At my current client they use GOA but until now they created 1 GOA for a specific p.org and the BADI transferred (and created) contract in ECC for the specific company code (they donu2019t have kind of central/global purch organization unit in ppoma). In the future they would like to create GOAs which are usable for all companies, but instead of creating (and changing) them manually (N GOA in SRM for N contract in ECC) they want to have an automatism.
    Does any of you have any experience on this? That would be really good if you can share with me some high level overview about concept.
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Best Regards,
    Attila

    Hi,
    Let me correct if i am right:
    - Central Contract -> new concept of SRM 7.0. 1 contract which is visible and usable from ECC and SRM as well. (not available in SRM 5.0 - agree)
    - GOA -> it exist in SRM 5.0 for sure! (we are currenlty using it for ECC procurement).
    The solution what you are mentioned is good...but as you said only for SRM 70...we are in SRM 5.0 and we need solution for here. Do you have any idea?
    Currently i am thinking about a new solution based on "standard" functionalities: if a GOA need to be created for mulitple company, it has to be populated in Header distribution (all company will have the same contract header). It item detail all the required information need to be poupulate in SRM (i.e.: item 1 for p.org1/comp.cod1; item 2 for p.org2/comp.cod2).
    When this is done, the BADI need to check the informatoin in SRM GOA and create contract according to that -> in this case 1GOA is created, but the 2 items for totally different p.org/comp.code, the BADI needs to create 2 different contract in ECC (i would like to avoid using reference purchasing organization in ECC!
    Thanks in advance!
    Best Regards,
    Attila

  • How to validate long text in me31k( contract creation)

    Hi,
       I want to validate the long text in creation of contract(T_code - ME31k). In creation it self i want to get the long text for validation. How to get the long text value. For eg. "Release order text'  i am giving the value as '10'. While saving the document in ME31k i need to get the long text. Please do the needful.
    Thanks
    Jag
    Moderator Messag: Do not expect the forums to do your work for you.
    Edited by: kishan P on Jan 19, 2011 4:33 PM

    Use Read_text function module.
    you need to pass
    ID
    LANGUAGE
    NAME
    OBJECT   to the function moduel
    To find the Text id name language and object these are the following steps. Example: FB02
    1. goto FB02, Enter Document number
    2. from menuselect Goto>Header-->header Text..... New window will be displayed 
    3. select the Header Text. here you can see all the text. 
    4. click on the TEXT (which you want to know the Text id) , then press log ICON (you can find in bottom right of the text window) it looks like a rolled paper. 
    5. in the Next window you will find Text Name. Text ID, Language. etc...
    Regards,
    Lalit Mohan Gupta.

  • CBS: Creation of build location fails for Standalone Development Configuration

    Hi experts,
    We have an issue during setup of a Standalone development configuration in NWDI with CM Services. During saving the following error occurs:
    "Unable to save development configuration: Unable to create build location "SPO" on build tool "http://qpmr-nw01.sap:50000" using user "NWDI_CMSADM" [DICONF_CREATEBUILDLOCATION]: CBS Server Error: Internal server error( internal code: INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)"
    The trace logs contains additionally the following errors:
    "FAILURE to unset the owner-buildspace property on workspaces for buildspace: SPO caused due to an exception. Invalid cookie domain .sap. This may cause problems during future creation of buildspaces for the workspaces associated with this buildspace. Manual unset may be required."
    "Unable to create build location "SPO" on build tool "http://qpmr-nw01.sap:50000" using user "NWDI_CMSADM" [DICONF_CREATEBUILDLOCATION]: CBS Server Error: Internal server error( internal code: INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)
    [EXCEPTION]
    com.sap.di.cts.config.service.core.exception.DIConfCreateBuildlocationException: Unable to create build location "SPO" on build tool "http://qpmr-nw01.sap:50000" using user "NWDI_CMSADM" [DICONF_CREATEBUILDLOCATION]: CBS Server Error: Internal server error( internal code: INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR) "
    Does this have something to do with our domain name which ends with .sap?
    Thanks and Best Regards
    Harald

    Hi,
    yes, that is what I was afraid of.
    Let's try something else.
    Surely the problem seems to be related to the domain that is using the string "sap".
    Or at least this is what I can also see in the error message :Invalid cookie domain .sap.
    Can you please try with IP ? Go to CMS Track Data, and specify the CBS and DTR URLs via IP.
    Does this help?
    Cheers,
    Ervin

  • Move RE cost from Contract No to Building/Property within RE module instead of FI

    Hi, RE experts:
    Our company's process moves costs from contract to Buildings/Properties by posting a FI document that will debit to Buildings/Properties and credit to contract nomber.
    Is there any way to move the cost from contract to Buildings/Properties within the Real Estate module instead of posting FI documents?
    Thanks,
    Jenny

    Hi Jenny,
    As per my understanding through a REFX contract you can make the FI posting entries, at the same time you can define the objects as per your cleint requirement, for those objects you can distibute the charges / conditions what you are paying through a contract.
    In your case you want to flow the costs to Building, so try to assign the building in the RECN Contract in Objects Tab, (instead of rental object).
    While adding the conditions in the contract ( conditions tab ) try to select the Building and for that you can assign the conditions.
    To assign building in contract ( Objects tab ) you may need to do the foloowing configuration as below.
    SPRO - Flexible Real Estate Management (RE-FX) --> Contract --> Objects --> Permitted Object Types per Contract Type -->  you can select your contract type and assign it to building, so that it will allows you to assign the building in contract.
    ( Attached screen shot FYI ) .
    After assigning in contract - conditions tab - simulation mode - you can see the object cash flow ( against your building  & partner related cash flow ).
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Subbarao.Narne

  • Contract creation in Backend with Idoc message type BLAORD

    Hello,
    We are creating Backend contracts from the Bidding engine functionality. We only want to create backend contracts and did the necesary configuration.
    We activated BADI: BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
    Method CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE.
    We did not yet implement BADI:
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE in SRM 5.0
    In SAP R/3 Backend system (Version 46C) we see SAP is trying to create a contract via Idoc message Type: BLAORD.
    In the trx BD87 in the backend we get status 51 :
    Mesage number: 00 055
    "Make an entry in all required fields"
    In the segments of the Idoc however we do not see which field is missing!
    How can we best analise this problem. Or maybe anyone can give us a a hint what is missing.
    Thanks for any reply.
    Aart

    Hello RRK,
    In ref. to your mentioning to change the backend configuration from WKK to MKK might not be as easy to do for organizations.  As those configurations effect the overall creation of purchasing document types in R/3. 
    The Key issue is why the "Target Value" in the Header of the SRM GOA does not get transferred to the R/3 contract.  That's why the issue is still there. 
    Were you guys able to figure out why that was missing? In the BLAORD IDoc the Target Value seems to not get transferred from SRM - its 0.00 if the IDoc is reviewed in WE19.  This seems to be the problem.
    Just wanted to know if you see the same issue in ur system.
    Thanks.
    Sunny.

  • Pricing procedure for contract conditions at header level and Item Level

    Dear Friends
    In Contract Sales Document Type [VOV8]in Contract section Pricing Procedure for Header and Item
    What is the function of it
    where we can mention list of Pricing Procedure here bec in standard only 3 pricing procedures is available
    Kindly Regards
    Arun

    To have Milestone Billing Plan at header level also, you can maintain Billing Plan 01 in Sales order type (T.Code: VOV8) & for Item level Billing Plan has to be maintained at Item Category Level (T.Code: VOV7).
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

Maybe you are looking for