Contract Negotiation the amount is multiply by 100 in Price Agreements

Hi Gurus:
When I create a Contract Negotiation in Web Shop B2B, I indicate the Product ID the quantity and I specify a price, when refresh the page(when I press enter) the amount is multiply by 100, when I introduce another item the two are multiply by 100 again and this behavior is repeating constantly when I press enter or indicate refresh in the page.
I notice when I check the contract document by SAP GUI in TRX: CRMD_BUS2000121 and go to the Tab u201CPrice Agreementsu201D and I indicate the item price in the Item condition and press u201Centeru201D the systems multiply by 100 de amount same as web shop. But when I indicated the price and currency and then press u201Centeru201D the systems didnu2019t (In the web shop the customer doesnu2019t has the possibility to indicate the currency).
I checked the organizational model and has the currency indicated correctly, the customer has the currency indicated too.The country settings and the users settings the decimal notation is 1.234.567,89
I was looking for SAP Notes but for the package level that we have in the systems doesn't apply
Do you have any inputs for this??
Thanks in advanced
Sussie

Hi Sussie,
I propose that you create an OSS message for this issue if not already done. I have the feeling that you probably will not get a solution for it from anybody not seeing the customizing in your system.
Greetings
Torsten Kliesch
Product Manager SAP CRM Web Channel

Similar Messages

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE - posting extra lines (amount being multiplied by 100)

Hello Gurus,
I am using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE for posting.
When I check FBL3N, i see 2 lines:
The first one is correct while the second is a copy of the first one, with the exeception that the amount in Local Currency has been multiplied by 100. And this second line is not required.
I am passing only one line to the BAPI and I get 2 lines as output.
Has anyone encountered this problem before?
Thanks for your precious help.
Regards,
Parvez

Hello,
Here are some more information:
goodsmvt_code-gm_code    = '02'.
goodsmvt_item-move_type      = '101'.
The posting done in NISL is in fact done twice in SAP ECC6 :
a)      at normal standard price of the materials
b)      at standard price * 100 (current issue).
In 46C version, the posting was done only once at the standard price of the material. (correct)
In SAP ECC6, 2 postings are done:
            - Posting a) correct.
            - Posting b) multiplied by 100 should not exist. This error should be corrected.
seem to be related to the upgrade?
Any hint on this?
Thanks

Amount in certain currency is multiplied by 100 in bex report.

Hi,
Amount in certain currency is multiplied by 100 in bex report. Data in multiprovider is good. Suppose if amount is 123.123 in multiprovider then in Bex report it is showing 12312.3. This is happening where currency is HUF. I understand that I have to handle it at query level in bex. I also understand I may have to create formula variable/ CKF/ RKF. But not able to implement it. Please help me to solve this. I'm new in Bex.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Arindam & Anshu Lilhori ,
Following on the suggestion given by Anshu that make two RKF S1 & S2 . In S1 we maintain HUF currency. And in S2 we exclude HUF.
Now arindam asked for a general solution if there are other currencies too in TCURX with 0.
My suggestion is that let's make a Customer Exit variable on the currency . And read the table TCURX in the CMOD code and populate all the currencies inside TCURX with 0 in S1.
And all the other currencies without 0 inside S2.
In this way it will become a General Solution. He doesn't need to maintain the currencies manually.
Let me know if you find any discrepancies in this approach.
Regards,
Ashutosh

The bill document printed from a contract is not displaying the amount at i

When we execute the print layout form a bill document from a contract is not displaying the amount at item level however the total amount of the document is correctly displayed in the button of the document.
Thank you and best regards.

Hi Alberto
please check the field which has been mapped in the SAP Script and the Smart form.
it must be the header amount field. you can replace it with the VBAP_NEtWR or similar fields like kzw1 if you have mapped the sub totla sot get the amount at item levels
thanks
akasha

AC_DOCUMENT_DIRECT_INPUT ..Amount multiplied with 100

Hello,
We have developed custom posting program which posts FBB1 document using AC_DOCUMENT_DIRECT_INPUT program.
While testing the program in development client the posting was correct. However, while testing the same program in production client values are getting multiplied by 100. Value of 100 USD is posted as 10000 USD. There is no difference in user profile between two clients.
Has anybody experienced similar situation ?
Regards
Jayesh.

Thanks anyways...

Consolidation package multiply the amounts introduce on group currency

Dear Experts,
When we run the Consolidation Package twice, consolidation amounts
on consolidation group are multiplied base on the number of groups each
entity belong to.
We modified the DataSrc property IS_CONVERTED as a previous post suggests
then everything looks ok but the amounts introduced on Group Currency.
Parameterization for the data sources used for group currency manual
adjustments is:
- DataSrc Type: M
- IS_CONSOL: Y
- IS_CONVERTED: G
We tried to modify the property IS_CONVERTED to u201CYu201D, the amounts are
erased because nothing is posted on LC, as expected. If we change the
property to u201CNu201D, the amounts are not copied to the Group, it means no
consolidated.
Any solution? It only happens with the amounts introduced on Group Currency, but at consolidated level, I mean the amount on group currency remains ok, but consolidated value for this amounts it duplicated, any idea why? Someone indentiy any lack on the parametrization?
Thank and regards,
Iria

Hi again,
To limit the problem, the multiplied amounts are the ones introduced on Group Currency only. But the problem doesn't have any relation with the Currency Conversion, because it is done perfectly.
As a work around, we are deleting all the consolidated figures before run the Automatic Adjustments again, but the performances is not sustainable (more than 1 hour).
Thanks and regards,
Iria

HT2736 I have a $100 card from apple when I bought a macbook this summer. I want to share the amount between my two kids -- 1 who has I-pad, other kid has macbook. They have their own apple ID's assoc. w/ their device. May I pass on the balance to them

I have a $100 card from apple when I bought a macbook this summer. I want to share the amount between my two kids -- 1 who has I-pad, other kid has macbook. They have their own apple ID's assoc. w/ their device. May I pass on the balance to them??

A gift card can only be redeemed onto one account, it can't be split between accounts and it can't be used to gift amounts and/or items to other accounts (gifting can only be done via a credit card).

IM - IM52 Original assigned budget is automatically multiplied by 100

When assigning the original budget to a Project (from a node) in the Investment Progam (transaction IM52), the amounts entered are automatically multiplied 100, but the available budget for the project is correct and the amount discounted in the Node above remains correct as well (not multiplied). The same occurs when doing supplements or returns.
Can you please tell why is this happening, how can I solve it and what consequences may it bring?
Thanks in advance. Regards.

Hi,
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
Regards,
NNR

Share of the costs that is to be alocated to the account assign item NE 100

Hi SAP Gurus,
There is a PR created with account Assign=P (Project). Multiple Line Services are under "Services " tab and used different WBS (see sample below)
10    Procurement - MDA                          500,000 USD       WBS 1 = 99.7
20    Project Management - JKA                450.00 USD          WBS 2 = 0.0
30    Fab. & Assembly (Installation) MDA   1000.00 USD          WBS 3 = 0.2
Buyer will create a contract with reference to above PR. All items will be automatically adopted to contract however, there is an error encountered. Sum of percentages >99.9< smaller than 100 %. During adoption process, the sum of the % is behind by 0.1%. Why does the system does not allocate for the line item 20? This is standard percentage allocation..Is it because the amount is too small for the allocation? Please advise if there is a customization we need to maintain.
Thanks,
Madelyn

Hi SAP Gurus,
There is a PR created with account Assign=P (Project). Multiple Line Services are under "Services " tab and used different WBS (see sample below)
10    Procurement - MDA                          500,000 USD       WBS 1 = 99.7
20    Project Management - JKA                450.00 USD          WBS 2 = 0.0
30    Fab. & Assembly (Installation) MDA   1000.00 USD          WBS 3 = 0.2
Buyer will create a contract with reference to above PR. All items will be automatically adopted to contract however, there is an error encountered. Sum of percentages >99.9< smaller than 100 %. During adoption process, the sum of the % is behind by 0.1%. Why does the system does not allocate for the line item 20? This is standard percentage allocation..Is it because the amount is too small for the allocation? Please advise if there is a customization we need to maintain.
Thanks,
Madelyn

Can I change the amount of minutes on a single line plan?

I currently have unlimited minutes on a single line plan, but I hardly use my phone to make calls. I'm trying to lower my bill by reducing the number of minutes I have but I don't see an option to change my minutes in my account. It just gives me an option to change the amount of data I have.

I'm not sure if that's 100% accurate. I still have an old Nationwide min plan and when I log on to My Verizon I can still upgrade or downgrade my mins plan with one of the old Nationwide plans. Unless I'm misunderstanding the topic...

My battery needs service as it is not working for long. Apple claims it is not a defective battery and that it is my fault since I had the computer for 2 1/2 years and have only run the battery down to empty 100 times. It is my fault because I did no

Con't
Apple claims that because I did not drain my battery frequently and kept it plugged in for extended periods of time, that it is my fault the battery is failing. I disagree because I was not ever told to consistently drain my battery before recharging or not to keep it on and plugs in for extended periods of time. I do keep my desktop computer on most of the time and that is why I have kept my Macbook air on for extended time periods. I feel that Applecare should cover this battey issue and not charge me for replacing the battey. I feel I should have been told to not keep my computer consistently running on with poweror the battery will fail. Has anyone had this problem? Apple should replace my battery under Apple care as my battery does not keep a charge anymore.
I'll wait to hear.

You said---Apple claims that because I did not drain my battery frequently
You said--- I was not ever told to consistently drain my battery before recharging
You should never do that on purpose, whoever told you that had it wrong or you misunderstood something
Sure you dont have that backwards? thats exactly what you DONT want to do.
Did you often drain the battery very low? that would explain a lot.
Someone might have been misinformed about "battery calibration" regarding much older Macs with removable batteries (see bottom)
You said-----I do keep my desktop computer on most of the time and that is why I have kept my Macbook air on for extended time periods.
thats a problem there, youre not supposed to do that.
Keeping batteries connected to a charger ensures that periodic "top-ups" do very minor but continuous damage to individual cells, hence Apples recommendation above:   “Apple does not recommend leaving your portable plugged in all the time”, …this is because “Li-ion degrades fastest at high state-of-charge”.
                    This is also the same reason new Apple notebooks are packaged with 50% charges and not 100%.
http://www.apple.com/batteries/notebooks.html
"Apple does not recommend leaving your portable plugged in all the time."
*If you don’t plan on using it for a few hours, turn it OFF (plugged in or otherwise) ..*You don’t want your Macbook both always plugged in AND in sleep mode       (When portable devices are charging and in the on or sleep position, the current that is drawn through the device is called the parasitic load and will alter the dynamics of charge cycle. Battery manufacturers advise against parasitic loading because it induces mini-cycles.)
Keep it plugged in when near a socket so you keep the charging cycles down on your LiPo (lithium polymer) cells / battery, but not plugged in all the time. When not being used for several hours, turn it off.
And best "tip" is if its near a socket,...plug it in as long as you can (especially at home) since cycle count on the battery are the "miles that wear out the tires (battery)", however again, not plugged in all or most of the time.
General rule to remember of Lithium batteries is:
Never drain them LOW & dont always/often store them HIGH
While cycle count is commonly seen to be the “miles” on your Lithium Ion pack cell in your Macbook, which they are, this distinction is not a fine line at all, and it is a big misconception to “count charge cycles”
*A person who has, for example, 300 charge cycles on their battery and is recharging at say 50-60% remaining of a 100% charge has better battery usage and care than another person who has 300 charge cycles at say 15% remaining on a 100% charge.
DoD (depth of discharge) is far more important on the wear and tear on your Macbook battery than any mere charge cycle count. *There is no set “mile” or wear from a charge cycle in general OR in specific.    As such, contrary to popular conception, counting cycles is not conclusive whatsoever, rather the amount of deep DoD on an averaged scale of its use and charging conditions.
                          (as a very rough analogy would be 20,000 hard miles put on a car vs. 80,000 good miles being something similar)
*Contrary to some myths out there, there is protection circuitry in your Macbook and therefore you cannot overcharge it when plugged in and already fully charged
LiPo (lithium polymer, same as in your Macbook) batteries do not need conditioning. However...
A lot of battery experts call the use of Lithium cells the "80% Rule" ...meaning use 80% of the charge or so, then recharge them for longer overall life.
Never let your Macbook go into shutdown and safe mode from loss of power, you can corrupt files that way, and the batteries do not like it.
The only quantified abuse seen to Lithium cells are instances when often the cells are repeatedly drained very low…. key word being "often"
Contrary to what some might say, Lithium batteries have an "ideal" break in period. First ten cycles or so, don't discharge down past 40% of the battery's capacity. Same way you don’t take a new car out and speed and rev the engine hard first 100 or so miles.
Proper treatment is still important. Just because LiPo batteries don’t need conditioning in general, does NOT mean they dont have an ideal use / recharge environment. Anything can be abused even if it doesn’t need conditioning.
From Apple on batteries:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1446
http://www.apple.com/batteries/
Storing your MacBook
If you are going to store your MacBook away for an extended period of time, keep it in a cool location (room temperature roughly 22° C or about 72° F). Make certain you have at least a 50% charge on the internal battery of your Macbook if you plan on storing it away for a few months; recharge your battery to 50% or so every six months roughly if being stored away. If you live in a humid environment, keep your Macbook stored in its zippered case to prevent infiltration of humidity on the internals of your Macbook which could lead to corrosion.
Considerations:
Your battery is subject to chemical aging even if not in use. A Lithium battery is aging as soon as its made, regardless.
In a perfect (although impractical) situation, your lithium battery is best idealized swinging back and forth between 20 and 85% SOC (state of charge) roughly.
Further still how you discharge the battery is far more important than how it is either charged or stored short term, and more important long term that cycle counts.
Ultimately counting charge cycles is of little importance. Abuse in discharging (foremost), charging, and storing the battery and how it affects battery chemistry is important and not the ‘odometer’ reading, or cycle counts on the battery.
Everything boils down to battery chemistry long term, and not an arbitrary number, or cycle count.
Keep your macbook plugged in when near a socket since in the near end of long-term life, this is beneficial to the battery.
Peace
Battery calibration, battery memory, battery overcharging, battery training, …all these concepts are mostly holdovers from much older battery technology, and on older Apple portable Macbooks ranging from early nicads, NiMh and otherwise; and these practices do not apply to your lithium battery and its smart controllers.
Calibrating the battery on older Apple portable Macbooks with removable batteries.
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH14087
There is no calibration of current Apple portable Macbooks with built-in batteries.
http://support.apple.com/ht1490
There is no battery calibration with current Apple portable Macbooks with built-in batteries. Lithium batteries have essentially a 0-‘memory’, and all such calibration involve the estimations fed to the system controller on the SOC (state of charge) of the battery over long periods of time as the battery degrades. The software based battery controller knows the battery's characteristics, or SOC and adjusts itself. This is why there is both no need and purpose to periodically deeply drain your macbook battery, since it doesn’t affect the characteristics of the battery, and further still deep discharges are something you should not do on purpose to any lithium battery.

How to change the amount of Vendor Line Item in FB60

Hi all,
I want to post the invoice in SAP with FB60. The journal is as follow:
Dr. Expense    1000 USD
Dr. VAT-Input    100 USD
      Cr. Account Payable     1100 USD
But the problem, the amount of Account payable is 1000 USD. Because I want to fill the amount in vendor line item (FB60) with the original expense (1000 USD).
I want to ask, there is any configuration in SAP to change the amount in vendor line item which it could be the same with amount of the original expense.
If you ever have same problems, plase share with me
Thanks,
John

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. The result of posting invoice that I want is as follow:
Dr. Expense    1000 USD
Dr. Vat - Input    100 USD
Cr. Account Payable   1100 USD
When posting invoices in FB60, there is a filed "amount vendor line item" at the top. Usually the field is filled with amount vendor 1100 USD, but I want to fill it with the expense amount (1000 USD). Which can be show the account payable 1100 USD.
Is there any configuration to change the field "amount vendor line item" ?
Thanks,

The amount of free SGA memory available in the database

Hi,
How can we calculate the amount of free SGA memory available from the instance if the database is not set for Memory management.If the sga_max_size is set for a particular value and the db_cache_size and the shared_pool and all other components are specified,how can one determine whether all the memory allocated for SGA is in use?

How can we calculate the amount of free SGA memory available from the instance if the database is not set for Memory management.When the SGA is allocated, the memory is fixed, and none of it is "free" really.
how can one determine whether all the memory allocated for SGA is in use? Are you asking about usage WITHIN the pools? If so, shortly after startup the database buffer and shared_pool will fill-up and stay full . . . . .
Here is the script that I use to see inside the data buffer contents:
set pages 999
set lines 80
spool blocks.lst
ttitle 'Contents of Data Buffers'
drop table t1;
create table t1 as
select
o.object_name object_name,
o.object_type object_type,
count(1) num_blocks
from
dba_objects o,
v$bh bh
where
o.object_id = bh.objd
and
o.owner not in ('SYS','SYSTEM')
group by
o.object_name,
o.object_type
order by
count(1) desc
column c1 heading "Object|Name" format a30
column c2 heading "Object|Type" format a12
column c3 heading "Number of|Blocks" format 999,999,999,999
column c4 heading "Percentage|of object|data blocks|in Buffer" format 999
select
object_name c1,
object_type c2,
num_blocks c3,
(num_blocks/decode(sum(blocks), 0, .001, sum(blocks)))*100 c4
from
t1,
dba_segments s
where
s.segment_name = t1.object_name
and
num_blocks > 10
group by
object_name,
object_type,
num_blocks
order by
num_blocks desc
Hope this helps. . ..
Don Burleson
Oracle Press author

The amount of memory used for data is a lot larger than the saved file size why is this and can I get the memory usage down without splitting up the file?

I end up having to take a lot of high sample rate data for relativily long periods of time. When I save the data it is usually over 100 MB. When I load the data for post-processing though the amount of memory used is excessively higher than the file size. This causes my computer to crash because 1.5 GB is not enough. Is there a way to stop this from happening withoput splitting up the file into smaller files.

LabVIEW can efficiently handle large files, far beyond 100Mb, provided that care is taken in the coding of the loading/processing routines. Here are several suggestions:
1) Check out the resources National Instruments has put together (NI Developer Zone > Development Library > Measurement and Automation Software > LabVIEW > Development System > Optimizing Applications > Managing Memory), specifically the article entitled "Managing Large Data Sets in LabVIEW".
2) Load and process the data in chunks if possible.
3) Avoid sending the data to front panel indicators, using local/global variables for data storage, or changing data types unless absolutely necessary.
4) If using LabVIEW 7.1, use the "show buffer" tool to determine when LabVIEW is creating extra
copies of data in memory.

The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount

Hi all,
Our customers are using SAP 2007-PL15 and SAP 2007-PL41.
When we want to create a down payment for a sales order, and we want to pay the entire amount of the sales order, including tax, we have to put an amount inthe TOTAL field of the Down Payment window since by default, the down payment amount is the total of the invoice before applying tax. The DPM is
higher than 100% (strange but I think it's normal since the down payment is not planned to take the tax in consideration).
Then, we create an incoming payment for this down payment. It's ok.
Then, we create an invoice based on the sales order we have paid with the down payment. It's impossible to use the down payment for the invoice... why that ? We receive the error 'The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount'. This causes big headaches to our customers !!
Could you explain us what to do please ?
thanks,
Luce

I'm very sorry, I have a similar question in dealing with AP Down Payment Request Linked to AP Invoice, my case like this:
1. I created 3 AP DPRs,their amount are each 100,000 RMB(for example, their document number are 10,11,12). then do the outgoing payment fully paided.
2. I created a AP Invoice with the amount 150,000 RMB(for example, this AR Invoice document number is 5). I use the buttom"Total Down Payment",and selecet AP DRP No.10 and 11. When I click the buttom"Add",an error shows:
The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount
and I don't know how to continue.....
Many Thanks
Kam
(PS:My English is poor,forgive me please. Shall I Speak in Chinese? then I can describe this question more clearly.)

Contract Negotiation the amount is multiply by 100 in Price Agreements

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for