Control key is set for u2018Process mfg

Hi ALL,
Which control key is set for u2018Process mfg., Inspection, AutoGRu2019

Hi,
Adding to the information given by srini,You can find the config setting for each control key in OPJ8 (Tcode)
If needed you can create your own control keys here & use the same in the Master recipe
Regards,
SVP

Similar Messages

Control key is set for u2018Process manufacturing with Inspectionu2019

Hi,
Which control key is set for u2018Process manufacturing with Inspectionu2019?
What is the meaning of FS Relationship

Hi,
Control Key for "Process manufacturing with Inspection" is PI02.
It is meant for Manufacturing is with Process Order with Quality inspection.
Further this Control key you need to set in CR01/CR02 -Default Values-> Operation Default Values----> Control Key
Regards,
Tejas
Edited by: Tejas Kantilal Pujara on May 21, 2008 8:54 AM

[OSB Security - OWSM:387256]Invalid CSF Key 'TestKey' set for override 'cs

[OSB Security - OWSM:387256]Invalid CSF Key 'TestKey' set for override 'csf-key'. This CSF Key does not exist in the Credential Store.
I am getting the above error while invoking an OSB OWSM username policy protected proxy service.
I have configured the key in the credential store and I could see that in the em console.I am not sure why this error comes up.Any help please?

Anuj,
I have followed the configs and fixed the above error.But now I am getting new error.I am giving the csf key in the OSB test console.
<con:fault xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/context">
<con:errorCode>BEA-386200</con:errorCode>
<con:reason>General web service security error</con:reason>
<con:location>
<con:path>request-pipeline</con:path>
</con:location>
</con:fault>
Caused By: javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException: [Security:090304]Authentication Failed: User TestUser javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException: [Security:090302]Authentication Failed: User TestUser denied
at weblogic.security.providers.authentication.LDAPAtnLoginModuleImpl.login(LDAPAtnLoginModuleImpl.java:261)

GR via MIGO allowed for POs with conf control key

GR via MIGO allowed for POs with conf control key.
where GRs should be allowed only based on ASN (INB) Del.
How to restrict GR via MIGO when confirmation control key is set?

ideally it should work, however check Conformation Control Key LA.
Confirmation sequence " GR relevant " and GR assignemnt is checked or not, in SPRO > MM> Purchasing --> Confirmations --> Set up confirmation control.

Control key for external process operation & internal.

Hello,
We have created one control key (ZP01) T code OP67.
In the customisation (OP67) for "External processing" selection field we select "X" i.e. "Internal processed operation / Extarnal processing possible.
If this field is blank then it is a "Internal operation"
If this field is "+" Then it is external operation, in this case system creates the purchase requisition after release the production order.
We want to know,
If this field is with "X", then what is the proceedure to create the purchase requisition for external operation.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
Nilesh

Hello Brahmankar,
Thanks for your prompt detail reply.
As per your suggestion already we have that setting for another controll key (PP02)
It is std for SAP it is working fine, in this control key the setting is "+" for external proceesing in OP67.
Now my requirement is instead of "+" I made it "X" i.e. Internal processed operation / External processing possible. In this case system is not generating purchase requisition after production order release.
I want to know for external processing whether I have to create purchase requisition manualy?
or any other process we have to follow?
Thanks & Regards,
Nilesh..

How to create inbound delivery for items with no confirmation control key.

hi Please help me with this..
are there any user exits to create an inbound delivery for scheduling agreement items with no confirmation control key.
my req is
i have 12 items (me33 transaction) of them three have confirmation control key populated and out of those three 2 will be deleted so only one item is left for inbound delivery creation, but i need to have all this possible for all items with or without confirmation control key.
thank you

hi
for inbound delivery there is BAdi called LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC... in there is method called ITEM_DELETION... in this u can flag the item to delete or not..
this will be triggered for inbound as well as oubound delivery..
you can check confirmation status for the PO in the table EKES... in this table there is filed called EBTYP.. using this field u can check the PO item confirmation status..
I hope above information is helpuful for u

What can I do to prevent the control key from not working in the future?

Background:
I bough an macbook pro about 1 year and 3 months ago and after 9 months of usage my control key stopped working for about an hour or two.This happened every time I turned on or awoke my mac from sleep (lid down).I sent it to an authorized apple service center and they replaced the keyboard.Everything was fine for about 4-5 months when the same thing happened again, ctrl key stopped working but this time not when turning on my mac but at random times and for random intervals.I sent it again to the service center but they told me that this time it won't be for free because my 1 year warranty has expired.I should mention that in European Union and Romania (the country where I am from and from which the mac was purchased) the law is that any electronics device sold has to come with at least 2 years of warranty.Apple seems to ingore this law.
Anyway, after long conversations with apple uk on the phone they agreed to pay for the keyboard but not for the labor which was 70 eur ($100).It's not much but my 2 year warranty should have covered it.The sad part is that I have no guarantee that it's indeed a keyboard error and not something else, this might happen again in 4 months and I doubt this time apple would agree paying for the keyboard (which is 150eur) ($215).
I should also mention that before calling apple uk I tried apple's romanian number (listed on their site) and it didn't work on the 3 phone networks that I've tried (2 fixed and one mobile) which led me to believe that apple support is in fact a big joke.
Suffice to say that I will no longer purchase any apple devices or software, I regret purchasing mac os x lion just a week ago, when I will no longer use it because I intend to sell all my apple gear (timecapsule, iphone4, macbook pro) and buy stuff from companies that value their customers and respect their contracts.
My questions are this:
1) why does apple ignore EU and Romanian law?
2) what can I do to prevent this from happening in the future
3) can I request that my macbook be more thoroughly inspected? I suspect the keyboard is not the main problem and it will soon happen again as it happened two times already.
4) can I do something for the repair labor charge to be waved? It is illegal in my country to ask for one in this scenario...

Everyone reading your posts here is just another MacBook Pro user. We're all volunteers, not Apple employees. No one here can speak for Apple.
In my personal opinion, buying Apple products in a country where Apple has no stores and no corporate presence is a risk that the buyer takes knowingly. I don't think it's a wise risk, and I don't recommend that anyone take it. A small percentage of the products sold anywhere are going to have problems, and it makes more sense to buy an inferior product that can at least be serviced locally than to buy a superior product that may have to be sent thousands of miles for repair if anything ever goes wrong with it.

Control Key Toggles Mut

My left control key toggles mute for some **bleep** reason after i installed this X-FI, its an Xtreme Gamer Fatalty Pro series. I can not find settings for hot keys in the audio console or anywhere else. Any help here?
I am on winxp pro, just installed no applications but default drivers for everything.

/bump

Control key ck01,ck02,ck03?

hi
please describe in detail the differences among control key ck01,ck02,ck03
regards
sanjay

Sanjay,
For the first key i.e. CK01- auto good receipt with inspection, in OP00 the two indicators must have ticked first is inspection characteristic required & auto GR.
It means that if this control key is used for the operation then the auto GR will happen with the confirmation & the stock would be posted to inspection stock.
In second control key i.e. CK02- relevent to costing, the cost indicator must be ticked. If this key is used in the operation then the operation will be included in the costing.
In the third control key i.e. CK03- auto good receipt without inspection, the auto GR indicator must be ticked & not the inspection characteristic required. If this key is used in the operation then the the auto GR will happen with the confirmation & stock will be posted to unrestricted stock.
Also refer the link provided,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/b1/c03e4a439a11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Hope this helps you.
SmanS

Confirmation Control Key not transfered to backend

Hi All,
I have a problem for SRM POs. We have a particular Confirmation Control Key(CCK) configured for a vendor in the vendor master.
Whenever a PO is created in SRM and transfered to R/3 this value needs to be populated in the R/3 PO as well. However this is not happening for all the POs.
A few POs are having the CCK and few dont have it. Any idea why?
Regards
Zubair

Hi Zubair,
Check the following threads which might help you in resolving your issue.
Confirmation Control Key
Re: PurchOrder <PO number> : Enter Conf. Control
If the CCK is not maintained in vendor master it would be maintained in Configuration. If not check the purchase info record or the contract reference.
This might be the reason why for some vendor P.Os its coming and for some its not coming.
Check the same and let us know in case of any further clarifications.
Regards,
Teja

PO User Exit to change confirmation control key

Hi All,
I have to hard code the confirmation control key to a constant(e.g 0006, where the value doesnt exist in Confirmation Control Key table T163L) for a particular Order Type while creating/ changing a PO through Tr. ME21/ME21N or ME22/ME22N.
Is it possible to do so using UserExits
Appreciate your Help.
Regards,
Anbalagan

Hi ,
I dont think you can change the control record of any IDOC .
If you look at an example Function module MASTERIDOC_CREATE_CREMAS , used to create Vendor IDOCS ,
the call customer-function has only the idoc data record as tables parameter .

To Pick correct Confirmation Control Key Automatic in creating Info Records

Dear All
We have Import Vendors and Domestic Vendors.In Import PO Creation Except for one vendor, rest of all the Vendors should have the Confirmation Control key as Mandatory.For domestic PO the Confirmation Control key should be Optional.This Confirmation control key is flowing from the Info record which is maintained by the Core Team of the Business.Since this Confirmation control key is not maintaining correctly (say Optional for the Import Vendor Infor records instead of Mandatory) by that core team in the info record ,while doing Goods Receipts system is not accepting to post through IDOC's.
How can we control this while creating Info record, means for Import Vendor Info record, system must not allow Confirmation control key as Optional and for Domestic Vendor system must not allow Confirmation control key as Mandatory.
Note :for One import Vendor say XXXXXXX the Confirmation control key must be Optional and for all Import Vendors it Must be Mandatory.
Kindest Regards

Hi,
If you are using seperate vendor account group for import vendors you can make it mandatory for that vendor master purchasing tab
it will flow to info and po from there for one optional vendor create one dummy key with no confirmation control and assign in the
optional vendor
Thanks
Diwakar

Confirmation control key check for inbound delivery creation

Hi,
Currently, in the Client's company, the process of receiving goods from purchase orders looks like that (SAP-wise):
- create a purchase order,
- receive goods using MIGO and automatically create an inbound delivery,
- pack the delivery and post goods receipt.
Recently, some patches have been installed, including one described by note 1602047 (which basically enforces checking confirmation control keys if goods receipt assignment and goods receipt relevance are activated for inbound deliveries). Note says that it only affects two-step stock transfer and creation of automatic inbound deliveries using SPED output but it seems it also affects other basic processes like PO receipt in MIGO.
Now, when using the old control key (that had MRP-Relevant and GR-Relevant fields checked), the system is unable to automatically create an inbound delivery after the goods receipt is posted with MIGO (with message VL148 - Not possible to create an inbound delivery). I learned that this is because the "GR Assignment" field must be checked in the confirmation control key so it's possible to automatically create aninbound delivery after receiving a purchase order in MIGO.
After changing the confirmation control key to have the missing field checked it's not possible anymore to receive goods from PO in MIGO as the PO requires shipping notification in order to be processed in MIGO thus requiring of manual creation of an inbound delivery.
Is there any way to skip this check so the process would remain the same (this model has been working fine for few years in the Client's system) and the inbound delievery would be created automatically after posting the receipt in MIGO?
Thanks in advance,
Piotr

Hi,
don't know if you found a solution, but we received the following message from SAP:
The advent of the new version requires some attention to the users. It
was necessary to avoid inconsistencies which in the past version the
system was susceptible.
Main Program SAPMM07M
Source code of MM07MLVS
sy-msgid VL sy-msgty E sy-msgno 148
I have checked the process and through debugged I could confirm the
following information SAP is providing to all similar incidents reportedfor us:
Error message VL 148 is issued if in the confirmation control key used
in the purchase order, the fields for MRP-relevance (T163G-KZDIS),
GR relevance (T163G-WEREL) and GR assignment indicator (T163G-WEZUO)
are not set.
The correction of note 1602047 was necessary to avoid inconsistencies
(table EKES) in the purchase order. Without having the GR assignment
(T163G-WEZUO) set, there is no unique reference created between the
purchase order history (table EKBE) and the inbound delivery
confirmation (table EKES) at goods receipt which leads to a problem if
several inbound deliveries exist for the same purchase order.
If you set T163G-WEZUO to 'X', this assures that, for an inbound
delivery, the confirmation record (EKES) belonging to this inbound
delivery (EKES-VBELN) is also accurately updated at goods receipt.
How to solve the issue?
Use a confirmation control key with the GR assignment indicator set
and then create the inbound delivery with VL31N. If you want to be able
to create the inbound delivery with reference to a certain line item in
the PO, use transaction VL34.
If you still want to use transaction MIGO, there is the following
workaround:
- Create a purchase order without any confirmation control key
- Create a goods receipt (GR) in transaction MIGO with reference to this PO and post the GR to a non-HU-managed storage location
- Create a transfer posting with MIGO using movement type 311 to
transfer the goods from the non-HU-managed storage location to the
HU-managed storage location.
As the transfer posting is an additional step for the user, the whole
process could be automated using a partner storage location
(T001l-PARLG) for the GR which then triggers (through a modification)
the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create the transfer posting without
user interaction.
I hope to have satisfied you on the reason why it is now happening and
also I believe you can explain to business that it is a new behavior
necessary done from SAP side to avoid worse situations, we are aware of
potential dissatisfaction it might cause. SAP Support is always
available to clarify any issue.
Sorry for not having a more positive answer.
I hope it helps!
Leentje

Confirmation Control Key Should be mandatory for PO document type

Hi All,
I want to know, is there any configuration settings to make mandatory "confirmation control key" for the Particular Purchasing document type's.
If it is not there what should be the best to achieve this requirement.
Thanks in Advance,
Shankar.

Hi
I think there is no standard setting to make mandatory document "confirmation control key" for the Particular Purchasing document type's.
Best way is to maintain in Purchasing view of vendor master record since confirmations rare sent by the vendor.If you want for some perticular materials you can maintain in Purchasing info record.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Automatically Assign Control Key for External Assignment

Hi All,
Please can someone advise how I automatically assign the External Processing Control Key at the operation level using the Work Centre.
I have a Main Work Centre set up which is linked to every Functional Location. This Work Centre has a default Control Key PM01 - Plant Maintenance - Internal, assigned.
I also have a second Work Centre which has Control Key PM02 PLant Maintenance - External, assigned.
When I create a Work Order the system uses the Control Key assigned to the main work centre and assigns this at the operation level.
When I change the Work Centre for Operation 010, to the second Work Centre (PM02 Control Key) it doesn't pull this through to the operation. I have to change this manually.
Could someone explain why this is the case and how I resolve the problem.
Any help appreciated.
Regards
Chris

Teshin,
Thanks for the information. I have checked the OSS Note the issue is as discribed in the note.
I will look to implement the program corrections shortly and will confirm that the problem is resolved.
Many thanks for the feedback
Regards
Chris

Control key is set for u2018Process mfg

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for