CONTROL LEVELS

Moderator message: do not post questions either in the subject or the body, in ALL CAPITALS
HI FRIENDS
at new ,on change of both r work almost same.
then why don,t we use on change of instead of at new in control level?
Edited by: Matt on Nov 20, 2008 11:34 AM - second warning

Hi Syamala
Before posting search in SCN You will a get sufficient data from SCN.
Check This Link
difference btwn at new and on change of
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=18939507&messageID=4734682
Ranga

Similar Messages

Problem in page overflow with table contents having control level

Hello members,
My scenario is to display table contents from (Master Page)MP1 and then overflow to MP2 and use the MP2 for the rest of the overflowed pages too. In the form context, the table has control level grouping on a field(F1), which is set in context, because of which we can sub total for the group of records based on field F1.
Take the scenario that the content area(CA1) of MP1 fits only 10 records and content area(CA2) of MP2 fits only 20 records.
Test scenario 1:
If the table contents have records upto 20, then MP1 gets filled with first 10 records and then MP2 with rest of the 10 records. This scenario works fine.
Test scenario 2:
If the table contents have records upto 5, then only MP1 with current 5 records gets filled. This scenario also works fine.
Test scenario 3:( ISSUE BEING FACED)
If the table contents have records upto 50,(which are more than the combined number of rows of MP1 and MP2) then no data is displayed on MP1 and data starts filling in next MP2 and only approx 22 records are visible where few even cross the content area of the MP2. And no over flow for the rest of the records happen.
We use SFP Transaction in SAP to modify the layouts of the forms. Please let us know if the table having group set by control level causes any issue in this scenarion Test scenario 3.
Thanks
Vivek
[email protected]

Hi,
master pages don't support page breaks. Those pages are only used for the background things of body pages like page numbers, company logs or letter head layouts.
Don't use repeating objects on masterpages that may overflow its content area, this will always end up with unexpected results.
Put all those objects on a regular page (body page) which allows page breaks.

Multple page not coming correctly when using "Control Levels"

Hi,
There is a situation wherein "Control Levels" is required to be used. However, the output is not as expected. Some of the problems with this are
1. Some of the data is being lost
2. Some pages are blank
3. The data is overlapping/overwriting on the footer section
and others issues..
Has anybody come across similar issues? If yes, could you suggest a solution
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks,
Jayant

Having raised this message with OSS, we got to know that the issue was with the generated XML file. The line is BOLD needs to be added between the lines as shown below.
<template xmlns:xliff="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:1.1" xmlns="http://www.xfa.org/schema/xfa-template/2.4/">
<?layout streamLineLayout 1?>
<subform layout="tb" locale="fr_CH" name="data">
Not sure of the real purpose of this. But it works

Help for Control Level Events

Dear Friends
i had an internal Table Itab_emp
before saving from belowcode i want to check for a particular field
i had itab_otime which had value as time format for particular ids
so i want to add them for a id and check condition
output of itab_emp is
PERID Date OTIME
1      01.10.2007 013000
1      03.10.2007 001000
2      04.10.2007 000030
2      05.10.2007 001000
i want to add values for perid 1 and 2 and see the sum of that in a field in itab only so that i can apply condition
Hope u got my problem
Reflect changes in below code
i think control level events will help but How i dont know
SORT ITAB_EMP BY PERID.
LOOP AT ITAB_EMP WHERE MARK = 'X' .
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING ITAB_EMP TO ITAB_OTAPP .
      ITAB_OTAPP-OBJID = 1.
      ITAB_OTAPP-TODTE = ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP-TODTE.
      ITAB_OTAPP-FRDTE = ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP-FRDTE.
      ITAB_OTAPP-IMMHD = ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP-IMMHD.
      ITAB_OTAPP-CRETM = SY-UZEIT.
      ITAB_OTAPP-CREON = SY-DATUM.
      ITAB_OTAPP-CREBY = SY-UNAME.
      APPEND ITAB_OTAPP.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT ITAB_OTAPP INTO WA_ITAB_OTAPP.
    MODIFY ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP FROM WA_ITAB_OTAPP.
ENDLOOP.
Hope will get answer as soon as possible
Please Help Out Genius
With Best Regards
Ruby

Dear Friends
i had an internal Table Itab_emp
before saving from belowcode i want to check for a particular field
i had itab_otime which had value as time format for particular ids
so i want to add them for a id and check condition
output of itab_emp is
PERID Date OTIME
1      01.10.2007 013000
1      03.10.2007 001000
2      04.10.2007 000030
2      05.10.2007 001000
i want to add values for perid 1 and 2 and see the sum of that in a field in itab only so that i can apply condition
Hope u got my problem
Reflect changes in below code
i think control level events will help but How i dont know
SORT ITAB_EMP BY PERID.
LOOP AT ITAB_EMP WHERE MARK = 'X' .
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING ITAB_EMP TO ITAB_OTAPP .
      ITAB_OTAPP-OBJID = 1.
      ITAB_OTAPP-TODTE = ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP-TODTE.
      ITAB_OTAPP-FRDTE = ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP-FRDTE.
      ITAB_OTAPP-IMMHD = ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP-IMMHD.
      ITAB_OTAPP-CRETM = SY-UZEIT.
      ITAB_OTAPP-CREON = SY-DATUM.
      ITAB_OTAPP-CREBY = SY-UNAME.
      APPEND ITAB_OTAPP.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT ITAB_OTAPP INTO WA_ITAB_OTAPP.
    MODIFY ZHR_PR_M_OTAPP FROM WA_ITAB_OTAPP.
ENDLOOP.
Hope will get answer as soon as possible
Please Help Out Genius
With Best Regards
Ruby

Controlling Level At The Production Order Level

Hi,
I want to set the ML controlling level to the production order level because I want to see the actual BOM used for each production order at the production order level. Since a different BOM may have been used for each production order (although the FG is the same) i must be able to see the actual BOM for each production order at the CKM3N screen.
However in the controlling level setting there is no way to set the controlling level up to the production order level. May i know why?

hi
check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/b2/6d118acb0a11d28a150000e83234f3/content.htm
check whether production order level is possible. i dont thinks so.but it highly affects your system performance.
krishna

Control level Staements

What are control level statements ? what is the use of this ?
can any one give sample examples for control level statements
points for sure...
Regards
Vijaya

Hello Vijaya,
Check out the code below
Processing Control Levels
When you sort an extract dataset, control levels are defined in it. For general information about control levels, refer to Processing Internal Tables in Loops The control level hierarchy of an extract dataset corresponds to the sequence of the fields in the HEADER field group. After sorting, you can use the AT statement within a loop to program statement blocks that the system processes only at a control break, that is, when the control level changes.
AT NEW <f> | AT END OF <f>.
ENDAT.
A control break occurs when the value of the field <f> or a superior field in the current record has a different value from the previous record (AT NEW) or the subsequent record (AT END). Field <f> must be part of the HEADER field group.
If the extract dataset is not sorted, the AT... ENDAT block is never executed. Furthermore, all extract records with the value HEX 00 in the field <f> are ignored when the control breaks are determined.
The AT... ENDAT blocks in a loop are processed in the order in which they occur. This sequence should be the same as the sort sequence. This sequence must not necessarily be the sequence of the fields in the HEADER field group, but can also be the one determined in the SORT statement.
If you have sorted an extract dataset by the fields <f1>, <f2>, ..., the processing of the control levels should be written between the other control statements as follows:
LOOP.
AT FIRST.... ENDAT.
 AT NEW <f1>....... ENDAT.
 AT NEW <f2>....... ENDAT.
 AT <fgi>..... ENDAT.
 <single line processing without control statement>
 AT END OF <f2>.... ENDAT.
 AT END OF <f1>.... ENDAT.
AT LAST..... ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
You do not have to use all of the statement blocks listed here, but only the ones you require.
REPORT DEMO.
DATA: T1(4), T2 TYPE I.
FIELD-GROUPS: HEADER.
INSERT T2 T1 INTO HEADER.
T1 ='AABB'. T2 = 1. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='BBCC'. T2 = 2. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='AAAA'. T2 = 2. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='AABB'. T2 = 1. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='BBBB'. T2 = 2. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='BBCC'. T2 = 2. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='AAAA'. T2 = 1. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='BBBB'. T2 = 1. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='AAAA'. T2 = 3. EXTRACT HEADER.
T1 ='AABB'. T2 = 1. EXTRACT HEADER.
SORT BY T1 T2.
LOOP.
AT FIRST.
 WRITE 'Start of LOOP'.
 ULINE.
ENDAT.
AT NEW T1.
 WRITE / ' New T1:'.
ENDAT.
AT NEW T2.
 WRITE / ' New T2:'.
ENDAT.
WRITE: /14 T1, T2.
AT END OF T2.
 WRITE / 'End of T2'.
ENDAT.
AT END OF T1.
 WRITE / 'End of T1'.
ENDAT.
AT LAST.
 ULINE.
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
Rewards points if helpful.
Thanks,
Sachin

Control level+read

Ques]]
THE STATEMENT
READ TABLE <itab> WITH TABLE KEY <k1> = <f1> <RESULT> .
Is therebut is it possible to refer to PARTIAL FIELDS as was possible with the statement
READ TABLE <itab> WITH KEY <k1> = <f1> <RESULT> .
Q]] The control level hierarchy must be known when you create an internal table --why?

Hi, abaper.
I found some thing in SAP Library:
Using a Different Search Key
To use a key other than the table key as a search key, enter <key> as follows:
READ TABLE <itab> WITH KEY = <f> <result>.
or as follows
READ TABLE <itab> WITH KEY <k1> = <f1> ... <k n> = <f n> <result>.
In the first case, the whole line of the internal table is used as the search key. The contents of the entire table line are compared with the contents of field <f>. If <f> is not compatible with the line type of the table, the value is converted into the line type. The search key allows you to find entries in internal tables that do not have a structured line type, that is, where the line is a single field or an internal table type.
In the second case, the search key can consist of any of the table fields <k 1 >...<k n >. If you do not know the name of one of the components until runtime, you can specify it as the content of a field <n i > using the form (<n i >) = <f i >. If <n i > is empty when the statement is executed, the search field is ignored. If the data types of <f i > are not compatible with the components in the internal table, the system converts them. You can restrict the search to partial fields by specifying offset and length.
The search is linear for all table types. The runtime is in linear relation to the number of table lines.
I hope it's helpful.
And I'm a beginner, I don't know the meaning of 'The control level hierarchy'.

Can not change the control level of item attribute "Inventory Asset Value"

I can not change the control level of the item attribute "Inventory Asset Value" from Master Level to Org Level. It's show me the message "FRM-40200: Field is protected against update".
Version is below:
Oracle Application: 10.7SC
Form: INVIDCTL 6.0.26

I did a trace when I chage the control level. the SQL is below:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM CST_ITEM_COSTS CHILD
, CST_ITEM_COSTS MASTER
WHERE MASTER.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = CHILD.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)
AND MASTER.COST_TYPE_ID = 1
AND CHILD.COST_TYPE_ID (+) = 1
AND NVL(MASTER.ITEM_COST,0) != NVL(CHILD.ITEM_COST (+) ,DECODE(MASTER.ITEM_COST, NULL ,0,-99999))
AND MASTER.ORGANIZATION_ID IN (SELECT MASTER_ORGANIZATION_ID
FROM MTL_PARAMETERS
WHERE ORGANIZATION_ID != MASTER_ORGANIZATION_ID )
AND CHILD.ORGANIZATION_ID IN (SELECT ORGANIZATION_ID
FROM MTL_PARAMETERS
WHERE MASTER_ORGANIZATION_ID = MASTER.ORGANIZATION_ID )

How can I reference an external help file from context sensitive help at the control level?

My goal is to provide context sensitive help for each control displayed on the front panel using a help file created externally. I know that at the VI level I can specify a Help Path; I want the same behaviour for each control inside a VI. I also know about creating a custom control and specifying the Help Path in there, but it doesn't help in this situation, for I have hundreds of controls in my application and I cannot go back and replace each one with a unique .ctl. If I could override each instance of the custom control with unique path data that would do the trick, but that's not how it works.
Is there a way to add the Help Path information to regualr controls?
-euge
ne

This functionality is not yet built into LabVIEW.
About all you can do is cut and paste the help for each control into the description for the control. It is tedius but a finite task.

Control level Centers of Costs

Hello!
It is possible to realize the budgetary control for level of Centers of Costs, not to level of planning but for budgeting.
The idea is that the control of availability is activated in order that it could not exceed the budget.
Thank you very much!!!!!!!!!!

Are you talking about budgeting for the cost center? It's more of the Controlling component. Please look at this link: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/5b/d2200743c611d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm

Control Levels via Expression

Is there a way to use a slider to control the various attributes that make up a levels adjustment via expression? I am able to set them via scripting and have done so. However, the stopwatch that lets me create an expression is linked to the histogram as a whole, not its individual components, i.e. input black, input white, gamma, etc. Is this possible or am I barking up the wrong tree here? The goal is to control multiple levels applied to individual clips in one nice, neat location. An adjustment layer will not work for me because of layering. Also, I do not want my background to be effected by the adjustment, just a few of the pieces that make up my foreground objects.

You have to use Levels Individual controls..

APO DP - controlling level of forecast

I am using APO DP V5.
In my design, I can forecast at different levels of detail, in terms of characteristics, eg product and product group.
In batch jobs, I can of course define the level of detail, eg product group.
But in interactive DP, how can I restrict the user from planning at product level, for example.
Thanks, Bob Austin, Atos Origin

Hi Bob,
we have the same issue, but solved this in the following way: if a planner drills down to article level, the row is set to output only, using the this logic:
IF DET_LEVEL( 'MATNR' ) = 1
Row: Demand Plan (Attributes) =
ROW_INPUT( 0)
ENDIF
That way s/he can see the plan, but now change. Alternatively you could also hide the key figure...
Hope this was a small inspiration,
cheers and good luck,
Klaus

Controlling level of JPEG compression when exporting from iPhoto 6?

Hi all,
I'm wondering whether one can adjust the level of JPEG compression when exporting images?
I'm still on iPhoto 4 that unfortunately doesn't offer this option and by default produces fairly large images that aren't well suited for web presentations.
I'd be happy to upgrade to iPhoto 6 for that feature alone.
Cheers Martin

HI Martin,
There is no compression option in the File>export window. You can however input size dimensions so a 2592x1944 can be exported to any 4x3 value such as 800x600

TRANSFER FUNTION FOR CONTROL LEVEL

Hi
I was doing some calculos for a transfer of funtion.
But now I am not sure
How I can conect level Process?
Can you help me
files are attachments
Thanks
Mario
Attachments:
2.vi ‏416 KB

This board is only for asking for files to be converted. Conversion Board Rules!
You have an ordinary question and need to ask it in the LabVIEW board.
Also, when you post a message, please turn off your CAPS LOCK key. No need to yell the message in the subject line.

Plant and Storage Location determination at Item level during Copy control

Hello Freinds,
We are experiencing issues within Sales Order creation when the line item is referencing a contract. The plant and storage location is being determined from the contract - this should not be done, we have an enhancement in place for sales order plant/storage location determination which is how these values should be determined.
Kindly suggest, if it can be achieved through configuration setting at Copy control level, to avoid the Plant and Storage location determination from Contract in to Sales Order.
Thanks,
Anup Bansal

Hello
You can mention the additional logic of redetermining Plant and storage location whenever copied from contract.
In a sale order, i think you are maintaining a enhancement in prog MV45AFZB & user exit userexit_source_determination.
YOu can maintain the coding at same place.
thank you
Anirudh

CONTROL LEVELS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for