Control Plan for FMEA

Hi,
I created control plan using QPCP transaction. I clicked on FMEA Tab and assigned the FMEA in the control plan. The traffic light status is coming in red. Kindly let me know where i am going wrong.
Regards,
Pragalathan

Hi,
This is because of Non transfer of Characteristics from FMEA to Control Plan...
Refer below link for process:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/0063c232-199e-2c10-5482-eed82c19b416?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Check & revert.
Regards,
Anup

Similar Messages

PC - Generating a 'Dashboard' report on the status of the controls already planned for the 1st quarter of 2014, shows the control with status Submitted.

Hi;
I have a problem in GRC-PC I can't solve. My User is generating a 'Dashboard' report on the status of planned for the 1st quarter of 2014 (compliance controls), this controls not planned, but presented the control with status Submitted.
I appreciate any help...
Thanks all....
Regards....

kaeandcolesmon,
If you open the recovery drive (partition) it should only have a single folder (Recovery).
To make sure that your not saving restore points to that drive.
See:
Start, Control Panel, System, System Protection tab. Make sure the D drive partition is set to OFF so that it does not save there.
I am a volunteer. I am not an HP employee.
To say THANK YOU, press the "thumbs up symbol" to render a KUDO. Please click Accept as Solution, if your problem is solved. You can render both Solution and KUDO.
The Law of Effect states that positive reinforcement increases the probability of a behavior being repeated. (B.F.Skinner). You toss me KUDO and/or Solution, and I perform better.
(2) HP DV7t i7 3160QM 2.3Ghz 8GB
HP m9200t E8400,Win7 Pro 32 bit. 4GB RAM, ASUS 550Ti 2GB, Rosewill 630W. 1T HD SATA 3Gb/s
Custom Asus P8P67, I7-2600k, 16GB RAM, WIN7 Pro 64bit, EVGA GTX660 2GB, 750W OCZ, 1T HD SATA 6Gb/s
Custom Asus P8Z77, I7-3770k, 16GB RAM, WIN7 Pro 64bit, EVGA GTX670 2GB, 750W OCZ, 1T HD SATA 6Gb/s
Both Customs use Rosewill Blackhawk case.
Printer -- HP OfficeJet Pro 8600 Plus

Control Plane Policing (CoPP) for Data Center

Hi All,
I am planning to apply CoPP on different routers and switches of Data Center. This Data Center comprises of Cisco 6513 (VSS), Catalyst 3750, Cisco 3845 and Cisco 2811.
My question are:
1. Do we have to apply CoPP on Catalyst 3750, as these are DMZ switches only?
2. How to find the packet processing rate from router and switches?
3. Any best practices CoPP template for routers running OSPF and BGP?
Thanks and Regards,
Ahmed.

1. You would need to apply CoPP to all routers/switches that are
manageable from untrusted sites. So even if you have non-DMZ switches
that will be able to be telneted to from the outside for example,
CoPPing them would be helpful for you.Do we not need to apply
CoPP on switches and routers that are not telneted from outside?
Control plan traffic is traffic that goes to the control plane of the router like management traffic, snmp etc. If there is a firewall securing you from the outside I would feel my switches are more secure and it is not easy to bring them to their knees with an attacker doing too much from the outside. Control plane policing applies to all control plane traffic, but it is mostly against outsiders that someone would try to protect himself.
2. "sh proc
cpu" would give you some insight for processes like ssh or telnet and
how much the take. Not control packet rate processing though.I
want to know the maximum packet processing rate of a router or switch?
I don't think you will be able to pull that number.
3. Depends
on how powerful the router is, how many commands you are running, how
much route processing is going on.Best practice for a router
running OSPF with 200 routes?
Don't know of any.
PK

Do you know a unicast protocol for the Ethernet control plane?

Hi,
Does anyone know a protocol for the Ethernet control plane which has a unicast destination address?
MVRP, MMRP, MSTP, RSTP, all these protocols have a multicast reserved destination address.
Perhaps we have to look non-802.1Q control plane protocols.
Best regards,
Michel

Hi Peter,
> I wonder if any of the OAM protocols, especially the one providing the loopback/ping test is unicast-based.
In G.8013 (07/2011) section 7.3:
"The Ethernet loopback function (ETH-LB) is used to verify connectivity of a MEP with a MIP or
peer MEP(s). There are two ETH-LB types:
• Unicast ETH-LB.
• Multicast ETH-LB".
> In any case, think of LOOP frames sent by Catalyst switches to detect self-looped ports. In these frames,
> the source and destination MAC address are set to the unicast MAC of the egress port.
As I said above, it's a good case for my little study.
The LOOP frame, from Cisco, was certainly interesting and important before 2004.
Since 802.3ah-2004 we have the OAM remote loopback (in link OAM, and not network OAM as ETH-LB).
Best regards,
Michel

IPv6 for management and control plane on WLCs and LWAPs

Good morning, everybody!
I am trying to find answer to a question that has been previously asked by people but never successfully answered
The question is about IPv6 support on Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers and access points... Does Cisco have a roadmap to include support for IPv6 used in CAPWAP, control plane and management? There are couple of posts on this topic that do not unfortunately provide any answer to this point.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3018843
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-15667
Infamous "Cisco IPv6 Solution" at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/technologies/collateral/tk648/tk872/tk373/technologies_white_paper_09186a00802219bc_ps6553_Products_White_Paper.html briefly states "Wireless Solutions... In future, IPv6 control plane features may get added to those components."
Has anyone heard of any more specific roadmap for IPv6 support for CAPWAP, control plane and management on WLCs and LWAPs?

Full ipv6 support will never be available on the Wism and 440x controllers because they have a NPU to forward traffic and it was not designed with ipv6 in mind.
The 5508 and Wism2 and all new controllers all have CPU based forwarding and ipv6 is coming in next releases.
WLC 8.0 is only for december 2011/2012 and I have to say I don't know if it will support native ipv6.
my 2 cents

What is the Control Plans functionality in cProjects used for?

Hi Folks,
What is the purpose and usage of control plans in cProjects? Is this useful in an environment where QM is not implemented? Appreciate if somebody could provide an example of how this functionality will be useful from a project management standpoint. I am on cProjects 4.5.
Cheers,
Lashan

Hi,
the control plan functionality in cProjects is deprecated, see SAP Note 1114207:
Using the control plans is not recommended because with new
developments in SAP PLM Quality Management (QM). cProjects
remains the preferred project management solution, but all QM
aspects that are not directly related to project management
should be managed in SAP ERP.
Kind regards,
   Florian

Rule for Control Plane traffic Transparent Firewall

Hi Everyone,
ASA working in routed mode traffic is allowed by default from high security inside to low security outside.
But in case of transparent firewall control plane traffic from inside to outside it is not allowed by default.
Need to know the reason behind this?
IS this due to transparent firewall layer 2?
Regards
MAhesh

Hello Chintan,
the VRF access link where the CE is connected is part of the VRF and isn't a member of the Global Routing Table anymore.
So any possible attempt to build an LDP session cannot impact on the backbone MPLS control plane.
If you want to specify all the acceptable LDP sources in a receive-ACL or in Control plane policing as part of a security plan that will be another matter.
Only on Carrier Supporting Carrier scenario you have an MPLS LDP or BGPv4 with labels session between PE and CE.
Hope to help
Giuseppe

Daily production plan for operations

Hi, One Production order generally runs for more than 1 month and consist of more than 100 operations and order qty will be one. in this case we want to prepare daily prod plan for operations not for qty. say on 1.6.09 we will do cutting operation, 2.06.09 willdo painting etc in monthly prod paln or weekly prod plan? pls guide how to map this?

Dear,
In production order you will get the details of operation plan and scheduling.
So in OPK8 do the setting for print of LG02 Op. control ticket, LG03 Job Ticket, LV01Time ticket,
Take a print through CO04N - Print and sent it on shop floor also.
You use the report like MCPW - Lead times or MCPK.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

How to see Control chart for a specific date range in QGC3

Hi
I am developing SPC for my client.I am facing one problem.
I am using one control chart for all inspection lot for a particular MIC.Free inspection point is used in inspection plan.
Control chart is used 516.(XMR chart)
Now when i am calling control chart for MIC executing QGC3,chart is showing results since creation chart date to todays date.
Now if i want to see chart for a particular period or date range,what is the procedure.
Thanks in advance
Nilanjan

Hi,
1. Even though when i give the Created on, and to date the system is displaying the report which is prior to the created on date.
2. Similarly the report data is different when the field is maximum no of Hits is given. for example when i giving this field as 10, 20, 30, etc the report is showing only 10 line items. if i enter 50, 60 etc it is showing the list for half i given.
Note that system is having more than 1000 line items to display..
Regards,
R. Loganathan

SAP QM Default Inspection Plan for all Inspection Lots created in the Plant

Scenario: We have a Proto type plant in which Daily 15 to 20 materials are created every day. We have only one inspection plan for all the materials.
Problem: We don't want to do material assignment in the Inspection Plant header every time a new material is created
Requirement: Is there any way to default the inspection plan for all the inspection lots created in the Plant by Standard Configuration or User Exit.
Your answers will be much appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks in advance,
Thiyagu

Hi,
In our case Creation of Inspection lots are controlled by QM View of Material Master. Our problem is to find alternative for assignment of New Materials in the Plan header in Tcode QP02, as we have only ONE INSPECTION PLAN. So our expection is all QM Inspection Lot created in the Plant should always get assigned to the SINGLE INSPECTION PLAN, with out doing any assignment of material in the Plan.
Thanks,
Thiyagu.

Activate Integrated Planning for Cost Line Items posting

Hi all,
Based on this SAP Help link, there are two ways to create plan line items:
1) By adding the business transaction "Plan line items" to the user status of the WBS Element.
2) By activating Planning Integration a.k.a. Integrated Planning for version and WBS Element/Project Profile.
Option 1 works fine for me.
However, option 2 does not seem to be working when I activate it, contradicting the state from the link:
If planning integration is active in the fiscal-year-dependent parameters of the relevant planning versions, the system writes cost element planning line items for plan-integrated WBS elements, regardless of user status.
So far what I have customized is:
-In transaction OKEV, select the version, click on "Settings for Each Fiscal Year" and double click for the year. Then I mark both "Integrated Planning" and "Integrated planning with cost center/bus. processes" checkboxes.
-Activate "Integrated Planning" at Project Profile level: go to transaction OPSA, select Project Profile, go to tab "Controlling" and mark "Integrated Planning".
Nevertheless, when I post plan costs from transaction CJR2 using the customizing above (based on second option), I see no cost lines when running CJI4.
I wonder if there is something missing in customizing that allows me to see posted cost line items in CJI4. I would appreciate very much your help.
Many thanks and best regards,
Pablo

Hi Gokul,
Many thanks for the link to that threat, Rachel Tang's reply on that discussion is very complete and included the answer to my question.
She comments that three points must be checked to activate Integration Planning:
1) Mark "Integrated Planning" at CO Version/Year level (SPRO > Controlling > General Controlling > Organization > Maintain versions).
2) Mark "Integrated Planning with costs centers/bus. processes" at CO Version/Year level (same transaction).
3) Ensure WBS Element has Integration Planning marked (PRPS-PLINT = X). [It looks like this is done automatically by marking Project Integration at Project Profile level BEFORE project is created]
In my case, I had first and second steps correct. However, even though I had marked Integration Planning at Project Profile level, it seems that already created Project Definitions are not updated with new Integrated Planning value after it is changed at Project Profile level.
Maybe it is possible to modify WBS Element's Integration Planning flag manually (though SAP OSS Note 301917 states that this is impossible), otherwise I could never achieve Integration Planning for already created projects.
In my case it would be more suitable to use the alternative of adding Business Transaction "Write plan line items" to User Status.
Many thanks to Sanjeev and Gokul for your help.
Best regards,
Pablo

Controlling Plan "Action" Recommendations

Question for Kevin and other experts,
While running ASCP unconstrained plans, when we have purchase order supplies in the future and no corresponding demands, the plan comes with a recommendation of action = "Cancel" on these supplies.
Let's assume our planners do not want to go ahead with this "Cancel" recommendation, as they expect some demand to come in for these items, and these are long lead times and we would like to keep the purchase orders as is.
When we invoke the Horizontal plan for this Item, the Horizontal plan does not seem to consider the supplies with action of "Cancel" in the Projected Available Balance calculations. (show quantity of 0 on those buckets). However when we double click on the zero quantity it pulls up the corresponding uncancelled purchase orders in that period.
If I update the disposition status type on MSC_SUPPLIES to null from 2 on these purchase orders (disposition_status_type =2 , means that the plan recommended to cancel them) and then invoke horizontal plan again, the Projected available balance takes into consideration the purchase order quantity.
My question:
Is there any way from the workbench, we could flag the supplies marked by the plan as recommended for cancellation, as overridden by the planner. (We already tried "firming" and that doesnt make a difference)
Thanks
Raghav

Hi
The ideal situation is if you can expose the demand that planners are expecting for these items either in form of forecast of safety stock to avoid any workarounds.
If this isn't feasible to do, you may make these PO firm as suggested before in ERP if you don't want Plan to recommend any changes or use Planning Time Fence option at purchase part.
I still believe that keeping the system aware of demand corressponding to these supplies is the best scenario in long run since any impact of changes to these demands can then be assessed by the system and acted upon by planners. This will avoid planners mistakenly building more supplies than needed and can provide some level of control and visibility to these phantom/ ghost demands.
Thanks
Navneet Goel

Controlling Config for Project System

Hai,
I have Scenario where in project is triggered when sales order is created using a planning startagy 85(Assembly processing with network/project). for this scenario can anyone guide what are all configuration settings to be done in the controlling module for the project settlement.
govind.

hello,
u r talking about MRP run ie make to order when sales order is created then process starts with production order which is to be converted to plan order by using t.code md02 and md04.
At each stage u have to maintain actual data and plan data.
u need to configure controlling related to production run process.
hope this may helpful to u.

Control Plane and Data Plane

Hi there,
I'm trying to figure out how to determine and how to differentiate between control plane and data plane especially in troubleshooting MPLS VPN. Any keyword that distinguish between them? It seems to be confusing for a newbie here :)
Thanks in advance.
maher

Hi Maher,
The control plane is simply the set of processes that are responsible for disseminating information on routes, labels etc within a network. This includes routing protocols whose job is to communicate information on routes between different routers. The information provided by these protocols is then used to building routing/forwarding tables.
The data plane is simply an abstraction used to describe the actual flow of data packets using paths determined by the control plane. The control plane traffic carries control traffic (which is not end-user data) whereas the data plane traffic is actual end-user data.
There is no single command that you can use to distinguish between the two. The commands you have on a router that can be used to view control plane operation are as such:
sh ip route
sh ip cef
sh ip bgp ...
sh ip ospf ...
sh mpls forwarding-table...
etc... and many, many more
Typically, there isn't a clear demarcation between commands that display control plane info and those that display data plane information... You could use commands such as the following to get some idea of data traffic flowing through a router:
sh interfaces
sh policy-map interface
etc.
Hope that helps - pls rate the post if it does.
Paresh

Copy planning for cost center Runtime error

Dear Gurus,
I am running KP97 to copy planning for cost center.
but I got following runtime error:
===================================================================
Runtime Errors         DYN_CALL_METH_CLASS_NOT_FOUND
Exception              CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_CLASS
       Occurred on     07.01.2009 at 13:21:25
What happened?
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "SAPLGUMD " had to be terminated because one of the
statements could not be executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
What can you do?
Print out the error message (using the "Print" function)
and make a note of the actions and input that caused the
error.
To resolve the problem, contact your SAP system administrator.
You can use transaction ST22 (ABAP Dump Analysis) to view and administer
termination messages, especially those beyond their normal deletion
date.
Error analysis
An exception occurred. This exception is dealt with in more detail below
. The exception, which is assigned to the class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_CLASS',
was neither
caught nor passed along using a RAISING clause, in the procedure
"USER_REFRESH_RE_EA" "(FORM)"
Since the caller of the procedure could not have expected this exception
to occur, the running program was terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
Class "CL_REEX_COPL_MASTERDATA_CHECK" was chosen during dynamic method call,
but could not be found.
=====================================================================
can anybody give me a hint how to solve the problem?
B.R.
George
Hi all, I searched the SAP notes, and found there is one note NOTE_0000632335 related to copy planning, I installed the note by TCode snote. the KP97 can run now, but for the IDES controling area 1000, I tried to test run copy version 0, period 1 to 12 from Fiscal year 2003 to 2004.
there are many records with error.
shall I ignore the error , unselect the test run and continue?
does anyone have similar experience with IDES R/3 4.71? why cannot I carry out all steps in online document for IDES?
B.R.
George
Edited by: George Pan on Jan 7, 2009 11:39 PM

Hi I checked the error with copying plan data. it's all because of 'plan data already exists'.
so I just ignore the error and continue.
thanks!
George

Control Plan for FMEA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for