Conversion assistance : Goods Issue in the past

Hello All,
Looking for some help for conversion of transactional data from Legacy.
Client wants to have the "goods issues in the past" to be converted to reflect the actual transactional data .
Anybody done anything similar in the past?
Appreciate the assistance!
CJ

in general any goods movement of valuated stock will create accounting ddocuments and hence effect finance.
Dont spend to much time to think about migrating historical movements, it is not possible.
if you plan such, then you would need to add all consumptions to your stock migration and reduce this by all past receipts.
As the movements are usually not stand-alone activities, you have to consider that you cannot perform a goods receipt without having the old (and already closed) purchase order/production order migrated.
further the goods receipt would recalculated the moving average price, so you would need to post all historic movements in sequence of their original entry. but this means you would as well need to post invoices, which will then lead to a second payment to the vendor (do you really want that)
all this for a statistical transaction like MC46?
If you are going to a new system, then a new time begins to start.
I guess you will have more important problems around go live than a MC46 list.

Similar Messages

Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

Hello gurus,
We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
I will explain the business requirement.
- We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
- This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
- Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed. For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this. This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit". This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
- During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue. We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi RJ,
First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
AS - IS
               Business process
          From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
e.g.
Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40 Unit
Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty to (60+40) =100 or
2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
Pros & Cons
if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
Solution ::
so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
Hope this help

Post goods issue at the time of complete shipment

Hi Experts,
Please let me know the configuration steps to do post goods issue in the complete shipment. Appreciate your help.
Thanks.
with regards,
Muthu.

Dear Muthu,
Please go through this IMG path then do the configuration settings.
SPRO>Logistics Execution>Transaportation>Shipments>Define and Assign activity profiles, here you maintain variant name in the At completion colomun select your shipment document then click on Maintain push buton now system will take you to the maintain variant screen in that screen you can find the tab Post goods issue for the deliveries of shipment under this tab you put radio button for carry out goods issue posting during save, then save the variant.
Now you create shipment document while saving the shipment document PGI will carry out for the deliveries which are avail in that shipment document.
If you more details go through this link it will help you,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/3d/42aa07074f11d2bf5d0000e8a7386f/frameset.htm
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

I cannot cancel the goods issue because the delivery has been archived

Dear Gurus,
I have cancelled the MB1C goods receipt but I cannot cancel the goods issue because the delivery has been archived. Is it possible for you to fix this batch record any other way ?
Early resposne would be appreciated !
Thanks,
Rafiq

Dear Friends,
Can u please help me out of this issue
Thanks,
Rafiq

I just got a new macbook pro, i had cs6 on my old macbook, i downloaded cs6 on my new computer today. When I open my illustrator files with vector images they appear blurry on the new computer. I have had this issue in the past and I don't

i just got a new macbook pro, i had cs6 on my old macbook, i downloaded cs6 on my new computer today. When I open my illustrator files with vector images they appear blurry on the new computer. I have had this issue in the past and I don't

cnsst,
Are we talking Edit>Preferences>General>Anti-Aliased Artwork?

Issue for the past 2 hours. Cannot make or receive calls in Little Falls, NJ. Is there a problem with the local tower?

Issue for the past 2 hours. Cannot make or receive calls in Little Falls, NJ. Is there a problem with the local tower?

You haven't enabled VoLTE (Advanced calling) have you? Not that it makes a difference just curious.
Have you upgraded to Lollipop yet?
Could be hardware or SIM card issue, read through this thread:
I can't make or take phone calls, but i can message and use data. Has this happened to anyone else? I've gone through three Samsung Galaxy S5's in the past three days, two of which have this problem and one just stopped working all together.

Goods Receipt in the Current Date however Goods Issue in the previous date.

Dear Experts,
I am doing a GR through MB1C (Movement Type 561) in the Current Date (Both Posting and Document Date are current) for a Particular batch of Material. However when I am trying to create a sales order->Delivery and PGI in the past date the system is allowing me to do so. What could be the issue ?
Example : On 23-02-2010 Goods Receipt of Material "A" for 50 Tons for Batch "B100" done through MB1C Movement Type 561.
Stock in System as on Date 23-02-2010 in MMBE is showing 50 Tons of Material "A", Batch "B100".
A Sales Order is created for 22-02-2010 for the same Matrial, qty, batch and PGI is done on 22-02-2010.

Hi,
Issue is that previous period is not closed that is why system allow to create delivery in back date.
Kapil

Inconsistancy with quantites/UOM on a good issue in the PO History

Hi All
I have a material with a base unit of measure Meters. I have a conversion maintained at 500 meters to 1 Roll
This material is a consignment material
There was a cross company request on the store for 3500 Meters
My PO History shows an issue of 7 Meter, but the value is correct and the good receipt and invoice is correct at 3500 Meters
The goods issue suppose to be in Rolls if the quantity is showing 7 right?
Now this shows up on my stock in transit list as -3493.
Is there anyway of fixing this?
Thanks
Vinesh

>
Vinesh Narsi wrote:
I am reading on OSS, there seems to be programs that can fix this inconsistancy. However which program do I use?
if you want that we evaluate which one to use, then post the OSS note numbers.
The best fix is not good enough if you dont know the origin and can close the bug.

MIGO- Goods Issue- Order, the value is not written into Table COSP

Hi,
We make a substitution of wbs element of line item( BSEG-PROJK ). The wbs filed will be filled automatically when the user input a cost center or a order number.
But we found some inconsistency in standard report S_ALR_87013558 OR CJI3.
The following is what we have done:
In Tcode F-02, we enter a order(e.g. A), then the WBS Element is filled automatically. when we post the document, and go to Standard report: S_ALR_87013558,
we can see the amount in the report.
In MIGO, we make a goods issue by order(e.g. A. Movement type is 261) , when we post, Material Document and Accounting document and Controlling document , but in report S_ALR_87013558 or CJI3. the amount is wrong, we can not see the amount we have done in MIGO.
The movement type 201 is also wrong, the value is also not written into tabl cosp.
But GI for project-movement type 221, the value is written into table cosp.
Can you tell me this is wrong or right? if right, why? if wrong, how can i correct it, i need some customizing or others? or my substitution affect the result?
Best Regards
qingda

Sorry, not reply these days.
And very thanks for all your replies.
I am a abaper, not familiar with the business.
The business consultant want to control budget, control cost.
At first, he let me do a substibution in FI line item of besg-projk(WBS Element), when we he test the substitution in TCode F-02, the WBS field is filled automatically as per G/L account and Cost Center or as per G/L Account and Order, and then in Standard Report 'S_ALR_87013558', we can see the changes of the cost.
But when biz consultant do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can not see the changes of the cost,but the value of WBS in FI Accounting Document is substituted correctly.
And if we enter the WBS manually when we do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can see the changes of the report 'S_ALR_87013558'.
In the original post, i was wrong, when we do a goods issue with movement type 201, the result is the same as 261, also we cant see the changes. but if we enter the wbs manually(movement type 201),the changes is write to COSP table.
The solution about the original requirement is right or wrong?
Thank You All.
Best Regards
qingda

Notification Required if goods issue aganist the cost centre

Issue/Concern:-
          To reserve stock for a cost center & don't allow issue to another cost centre or notification should be sent to the user.
Description:-
Stock is reserved by creating reservation by MB21 for one cost centre e.g.1151-Production. We want to restrict this stock for the same Costcentre only.But when tried to issue stock to another cost center 11512-Maintanance,
              System should allow for goods issue of this stock to another cost center other than Prouction but notification sent to the Prouction CostCentre user who has done the reservation while issuing.
Kindly let me know if you require more clarifications on this.

Yes Exactly,
                  UserA     -
Reservation 0001--Req Date 03-04-2010Material M-Cost Centre Production
Now the     User B    -
Reservation 0002--Req Date 01-04-2010Material M-Cost Centre Maintanence
Then User A has to get an email alert notification while Material M issuing to the User B.

How to block release item in Goods Issue if the stock is 0

Dear All,
I have an item that is placed in 2 warehouses.
For example in Warehouse 1 there are stock as much as 5
And there is No stock at all in Warehouse 2.
But when I create Goods Issue, SAP didn't block me to release the item from Warehouse 2 even though the stock is 0 so the inventory becomes negative. Beside that, there is also no warning about that.
Please let me know if there is setting I missed to block that process.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Lina Yuanita

Dear Lina,
Just add Michael, Lina Should tick manage inventory by Warehouse in Item master Data Tab Inventory.
HTH,
Yun Pho

Validation for Cost center for Goods issue against the cost centers

Dear Friends
In my client place we have 6 plants are defined and profit centers are defined for each plant. Hence here each plant is one profit center. Cost centers are defined plant wise.
The requirement is when the goods issued to cost center system should check the cost center is defined against the plant. ( i.e., Cost center def against the Profit Center, and Profit center equal to Plant).
Is there any provision to assign the plant to profit center or vice versa?
Please guide me how to resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Please check EC01. May be it can help you. But in my view it is not possible.

I can't post goods issue for the outbound delivery

I select the indicator of GI via delivery in transport block via TCODE OPKP and assign the production profile to the work schedule view of the material master.then I create a production order for the material and release it.I do the wm material staging for the producion order via TCODE LP10,An outbound delivery was created automatically and the movement type is 261.then I pick for the delivery and confirm the transfer order.When I do the post goods issue there is a error message .
E M7 226
Update control of movement type incorrect (entry 261 X X _ _ _ V )
then I see the onlinehelp,I find the configurations are ok.
the content is following in table t345.
werks supply area material staging indicaor
1000   PVB 1310WM     1                         1   wmpp   10000

Please kindly refer to the attached notes below :
523509     FAQ: Control tables (no Customizing)
161729     M7226 with KZVBR=V
Hope this helps.

Goods issue for the CO Order

Hello everybody.
I have some problems in issuing goods for the CO order(moving type 261) in MIGo transaction.
Message no. C6001          "Order XXXXXXX not found or not permitted for goods movement"
Please, help me.....
Thanks in advance
P.S. I am a junior consultant

Hi
     If you are doing GR with respect to PO please refer this link it may help you in some or other way.
      Message no. C6001 while doing GR with respect to PO
   Refer this link so that it may give you an idea regarding 261 movement type.
     Movement 261 and 262
     goods issue use 261 movetype
Regards,
Mrinalini.

Error while posting Goods issue for the reservation

Hi,
I am getting an error while trying to post the Goods Isuue for the reservation using MIGO transaction. The error is 'Level AR belongs to cash position (source symbol PSK)'.
Please help me in solving this if anyone has any idea, let me know what am I supposed to do.
Regards,
Lavanya.

Hi
I think Cash Management (TR-CM) module implemented in your system.Please post this in Finance forum.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Conversion assistance : Goods Issue in the past

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for