Conversion Ver.? to 2011 [lvlbp]

Can you please conversion this *.lvlbp for (version?) to 2011?
Attachments:
Packed Library.zip ‏1814 KB

Packed project libraries are fully compiled. There is no code to them. You can't convert them. You have to go back to the original code.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Similar Messages

Conversion from LabVIEW 2011 to 8.2

Dear All
Can any body help me to convert the attached file from LabVIEW 2011 to LabVIEW 8.2.
Kind Regards
Muhammad Irfan
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
LabVIEW 6281-40 Replace.vi ‏76 KB

This is what the Version Conversion board is for. But here you go.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
Attachments:
LabVIEW 6281-40 Replace.vi ‏99 KB

Migrating development software from LV 2006- XP to Windows 7 w/ver LV 2011

Labview 6.1 exe compiled in XP runs fine but when program is opened and running in Windows 7, i have errors related to "Polymorphic VI contain subVIs" error. Are there any steps to migrate old version from XP to Window 7?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

oops, sorry for the confusion. I'm trying to upgrade and have 2011 version on Windows 7, however, when I load this old (working) program, I am getting errors:
"Polymorphic VI does not contain subVIs".
When I run it on XP, with same 2011 version, there's not issue...any idea?
Thanks in advance for your help!
john

Transfert application mail vers outlook

Comment faire pour transférer mes mails, calendriers, notes de l'application "mail" de Mac vers ouitlook 2011 sur mac ?
merci

If I understand you right, you are essentially writing a proxy server that does some filtering in this case. I would start by writing a program that opens a socket and listens on port 110. You then point the email client at the program you have written. Whenever something comes in on this connection, open another connection to the POP3 server and send the request along, listen for the reply, and send it back to the client.
After you get that working you can look at what the POP3 server is sending back and do any filtering or additional steps before returning to the client.
There are some pretty good examples on how to do this in the Java Examples In A Nutshell book.

Firefox 9.01 does will not recognize/update Norton Toolbar update

Problem 1 on a Win 7 Pro computer: Firefox 9.01 has disabled Norton Toolbar ver. 2011.7.3.6 and will not update to the latest Norton toolbar version (2011.7.4.3). I have checked for updates in the add-on tab, and preformed Live Updates on Northon 360 version 5.0, and rebooted endless times to no avail. Other than going back to Firefox 8, is there any other solution? BTW, Norton IPS is at ver. 3.2 (OK).
Problem 2 on a Win XP Pro computer: Similar to above also with Norton 360 ver. 5.0. In this case, however, Norton Toolbar is stuck at 5.6, and Norton IPS is stuck at 2.0. Both refuse to update regardless of how many time I perform Live Update on Norton (and reboot).
VERY FRUSTRATING!!

You need to run LiveUpdate with Norton as per http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-Internet-Security-Norton/Firefox-9-Support-for-Norton-Toolbar/td-p/615563
If you are having problems with Norton and or their Extension in Firefox then you may get better support on Norton forum.

Updates for Nokia X6, 5530 XM and 5800 XM

Hello Nokia,
Nokia please give us more information about the announced updates you've promised us on the 29th of June.
We don't get any information about the updates, except the notice on 29 August.
Come on Nokia, release the update soon and don't ignore your faithful users!
(http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/08/29/new-info-on-the-software-updates-for-symbian-5-0-and-3-2-d...):
New info on the software updates for Symbian 5.0 and 3.2 devices
GLOBAL – Last week we made some edits in the article published in June on the software updates for Symbian 5.0 and 3.2 devices. We have since then received questions about this topic from our readers, so we’d like to share some more information on the status of these updates. We’d like to confirm that the planned updates for Nokia X6, Nokia 5530 and Nokia 5800 are still to be released and we are currently working on getting the software ready to launch in some months.
As all three models are among our older devices, not all operators globally will test and approve the software update for these phones. This is the reason why we decided to remove the devices from the global posting. Availability of the software update for these phones will be determined at a local level.
Best regards ,
Nokia S60 5.0 users

Yes, but when ?

PR1.1 is coming to the N8 & C6-01 today (C7 yester...

http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/02/04/software-update-1-1-for-new-symbian-devices
As it stands at the moment I think they've posted the article a bit early as not seen any rumblings on twitter about N8 users updating quite yet.
Hopefully the actual release will happen soon.
As per usual not all countries or regions will get the update at the same time. It's unknown when specific places will get the update. Network supplied or branded phones will have to wait for network approval before the update is released for them, this could take weeks or months.

richy_n8 wrote:
This maybe a silly question but how can we tell what version our phone is? By version I mean euro1 or ukcv etc....
Thanks
If you go to the device update menu (*#0000# or menu, settings, phone, phone management, device updates) then at the bottom of that screen you should find a product code. The code for my handset is 059C5Q5 & this relates to the orange colour UKCV N8.
If you locate your product code & search for it on google then you should be able to find out which variant it is. Now someone correct me if i'm wrong here but i also think that if your product codes have any alpha characters in it (like the C & Q in mine above) then it's a customised version (language packs, operator branding or both) and these normally take a little longer to receive the updates
I'd rather die on my feet, Than keep living on my knee's!

Microsoft Apps

Hi
Can anyone shed any light on what is happening with these apps promised for Q4 2011 ?
http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/09/08/microsoft-apps-are-coming-to-symbian/
Thanks
Solved!
Go to Solution.

athlon7750 wrote:
Nokia did say q4 2011 for the first part and early 2012 for the second. Now q4 2011 has passed and nothing, are these kinds of announcements some kind of con to increase sales ? Did Nokia know when they announced it that they could not deliver ?
this is the key sentence to it all.
The free updates, called Microsoft Apps, will require no additional infrastructure. The first updates will appear by the end of this year, with broad consumer availability arriving in early 2012.
And the part that is dealing with us as comsumers is the "with broad comsumer availability arriving in early 2012"
the only people that may have got any of these apps earlier was to be those with phones that had Belle preinstalled when purchased. Everyone else is not and was not getting it till early 2012. Essentially we are all comsumers so we all diffinitely fit the "broad comsumer" part. So no one lied, no one gave you false info.
Those lines were taken straight from the press release that was made on the Nokia developers website, so in other word the info that goes to app developers etc. Which was included in my post some months ago.
I know I am looking forward to these apps becoming available, not only will they be something that i will use, but I also think it will give Nokia a huge boost, with the potential for extra sales from business customers.
After all most of these apps like lync, onenote, powerpoint, document connection with links to sharepoint are all business related products, which for the majority of customers will not have any need for. Unless your workplace has these kinds of servers setup, with appropiate access for its users of course.
There really is only 2 apps, word and excel that a comsumer is likely to use on a regular basis. I happen to have access to the kind of servers required for the others apps which definitely helps me, but for most they will mean nothing to them, nor will they have any use for them. Unless you are in a position where you can have access to a microsoft communications server or lync server 2010 and to something like server 2008 that has sharepoint installed, then these apps are not even worth worrying about.

Error: ORA-16751: resource guard encountered errors in switchover to primar

Hello ,
I have just completed dataguard configuration for one standby server. However when I tries to switchover i am getting following error in dataguard log file.
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK ERROR: ORA-16816: incorrect database role
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK ERROR: ORA-16783: instance p11 not open for read and write access
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM Warning: cannot find the destinationsetting in v$archive_dest for database 'p11_disaster'.
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16728: consistency check for property LogXptMode found ORA-16777 error
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16777: unable to find the destination entry of a standby database in V$ARCHIVE_DEST
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM Warning: cannot find the destinationsetting in v$archive_dest for database 'p11_disaster'.
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16728: consistency check for property DelayMins found ORA-16777 error
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16777: unable to find the destination entry of a standby database in V$ARCHIVE_DEST
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM Warning: cannot find the destinationsetting in v$archive_dest for database 'p11_disaster'.
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16728: consistency check for property Binding found ORA-16777 error
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16777: unable to find the destination entry of a standby database in V$ARCHIVE_DEST
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM Warning: cannot find the destinationsetting in v$archive_dest for database 'p11_disaster'.
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16728: consistency check for property MaxFailure found ORA-16777 error
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16777: unable to find the destination entry of a standby database in V$ARCHIVE_DEST
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM Warning: cannot find the destinationsetting in v$archive_dest for database 'p11_disaster'.
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16728: consistency check for property MaxConnections found ORA-16777 error
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16777: unable to find the destination entry of a standby database in V$ARCHIVE_DEST
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM Warning: cannot find the destinationsetting in v$archive_dest for database 'p11_disaster'.
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16728: consistency check for property ReopenSecs found ORA-16777 error
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 0 RSM0: HEALTH CHECK WARNING: ORA-16777: unable to find the destination entry of a standby database in V$ARCHIVE_DEST
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 756068556 Operation CTL_GET_STATUS cancelled during phase 2, error = ORA-16810
DG 2011-07-09-20:08:58 0 2 756068556 Operation CTL_GET_STATUS cancelled during phase 2, error = ORA-16810
I have tried several times however it changes the role of primary DB to physical standby , which i again change to primary by "Alter Database Commit to Switchover to PRIMARY with session Shutdown;"
Here are the DGMGRL command prompts output.
C:\Documents and Settings\p11adm>dgmgrl
DGMGRL for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
Copyright (c) 2000, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Welcome to DGMGRL, type "help" for information.
DGMGRL> connect sys/windows123@to_primary
Connected.
DGMGRL> show database verbose p11_primary;
Database
Name: p11_primary
Role: PRIMARY
Enabled: YES
Intended State: ONLINE
Instance(s):
p11
Properties:
InitialConnectIdentifier = 'to_primary'
LogXptMode = 'ASYNC'
Dependency = ''
DelayMins = '0'
Binding = 'OPTIONAL'
MaxFailure = '0'
MaxConnections = '1'
ReopenSecs = '300'
NetTimeout = '180'
LogShipping = 'ON'
PreferredApplyInstance = ''
ApplyInstanceTimeout = '0'
ApplyParallel = 'AUTO'
StandbyFileManagement = 'AUTO'
ArchiveLagTarget = '0'
LogArchiveMaxProcesses = '10'
LogArchiveMinSucceedDest = '1'
DbFileNameConvert = ''
LogFileNameConvert = ''
FastStartFailoverTarget = ''
StatusReport = '(monitor)'
InconsistentProperties = '(monitor)'
InconsistentLogXptProps = '(monitor)'
SendQEntries = '(monitor)'
LogXptStatus = '(monitor)'
RecvQEntries = '(monitor)'
HostName = 'PROD104'
SidName = 'p11'
LocalListenerAddress = '(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.0.1.104)(
PORT=1527))'
StandbyArchiveLocation = 'C:\oracle\P11\oraarch\P11arch'
AlternateLocation = ''
LogArchiveTrace = '0'
LogArchiveFormat = 'ARC%S_%R.%T'
LatestLog = '(monitor)'
TopWaitEvents = '(monitor)'
Current status for "p11_primary":
SUCCESS
DGMGRL> show database verbose p11_disaster;
Database
Name: p11_disaster
Role: PHYSICAL STANDBY
Enabled: YES
Intended State: ONLINE
Instance(s):
p11
Properties:
InitialConnectIdentifier = 'to_standby'
LogXptMode = 'ARCH'
Dependency = ''
DelayMins = '0'
Binding = 'OPTIONAL'
MaxFailure = '0'
MaxConnections = '1'
ReopenSecs = '300'
NetTimeout = '180'
LogShipping = 'ON'
PreferredApplyInstance = ''
ApplyInstanceTimeout = '0'
ApplyParallel = 'AUTO'
StandbyFileManagement = 'AUTO'
ArchiveLagTarget = '0'
LogArchiveMaxProcesses = '10'
LogArchiveMinSucceedDest = '1'
DbFileNameConvert = ''
LogFileNameConvert = ''
FastStartFailoverTarget = ''
StatusReport = '(monitor)'
InconsistentProperties = '(monitor)'
InconsistentLogXptProps = '(monitor)'
SendQEntries = '(monitor)'
LogXptStatus = '(monitor)'
RecvQEntries = '(monitor)'
HostName = 'PROD102'
SidName = 'p11'
LocalListenerAddress = '(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.0.1.102)(
PORT=1527))'
StandbyArchiveLocation = 'C:\oracle\P11\oraarch\P11arch'
AlternateLocation = ''
LogArchiveTrace = '0'
LogArchiveFormat = 'ARC%S_%R.%T'
LatestLog = '(monitor)'
TopWaitEvents = '(monitor)'
Current status for "p11_disaster":
SUCCESS
DGMGRL> switchover to p11_disaster;
Performing switchover NOW, please wait...
Error: ORA-16751: resource guard encountered errors in switchover to primary dat
abase
Failed.
Unable to switchover, primary database is still "p11_primary"
Here are the changed pfile of both DB's
Pfile changes at Primary
*.db_name='p11'
*.db_unique_name='p11_primary'
*.dg_broker_start=true
*.dml_locks=4000
*.event='10191 trace name context forever, level 1'
*.FILESYSTEMIO_OPTIONS='setall'
*.job_queue_processes=1
*.local_listener='(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.0.1.104)(PORT = 1527))'
*.log_archive_config='dg_config=(p11_disaster,p11_primary)'
*.log_archive_dest_1='LOCATION=C:\oracle\P11\oraarch\P11arch VALID_FOR=(ALL_LOGFILES,ALL_ROLES)'
*.log_archive_dest_state_1='enable'
*.log_archive_dest_state_2='ENABLE'
*.log_archive_max_processes=10
*.log_archive_min_succeed_dest=1
*.log_buffer=1048576
*.log_checkpoint_interval=0
*.log_checkpoints_to_alert=true
*.open_cursors=800
*.parallel_execution_message_size=16384
*.pga_aggregate_target=347917516
*.processes=80
*.query_rewrite_enabled='false'
*.recyclebin='off'
*.remote_login_passwordfile='exclusive'
*.remote_os_authent=true
Pfile of standby server ( few parameters are created by DGMGRL itself)
*.db_name='P11'
*.db_unique_name='P11_disaster'
*.dg_broker_start=TRUE
*.dml_locks=4000
*.event='10191 trace name context forever, level 1'
*.fal_client='(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.0.1.102)(PORT=1527)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=p11_disaster_XPT)(INSTANCE_NAME=p11)(SERVER=dedicated)))'
*.fal_server='(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.0.1.104)(PORT=1527)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=p11_primary_XPT)(SERVER=dedicated)))'
*.FILESYSTEMIO_OPTIONS='setall'
*.job_queue_processes=1
*.local_listener='(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.0.1.102)(PORT = 1527))'
*.log_archive_config='DG_CONFIG= (P11_primary, P11_disaster)'
*.log_archive_dest_1='LOCATION="C:\oracle\P11\oraarch\P11arch", VALID_FOR=(ALL_LOGFILES,ALL_ROLES)'
p11.log_archive_dest_1='location="C:\oracle\P11\oraarch\P11arch"','valid_for=(ALL_LOGFILES,ALL_ROLES)'
*.log_archive_dest_state_1='enable'
p11.log_archive_dest_state_1='ENABLE'
p11.log_archive_format='ARC%S_%R.%T'
*.log_archive_max_processes=10
*.log_archive_min_succeed_dest=1
p11.log_archive_trace=0
*.log_buffer=1048576
*.log_checkpoint_interval=0
*.log_checkpoints_to_alert=true
*.open_cursors=800
*.parallel_execution_message_size=16384
*.pga_aggregate_target=207827763
*.processes=80
*.query_rewrite_enabled='false'
*.recyclebin='off'
*.remote_login_passwordfile='exclusive'
*.remote_os_authent=true
*.replication_dependency_tracking=false
*.sessions=96
*.sga_max_size=311741644
*.shared_pool_reserved_size=15587082
*.shared_pool_size=300870822
*.sort_area_retained_size=0
*.sort_area_size=2097152
p11.standby_archive_dest='C:\oracle\P11\oraarch\P11arch'
*.standby_file_management='AUTO'
Please advice .
Thanks & Regards
Edited by: dharm.singh on Jul 9, 2011 7:48 AM

I have added the standby archive log destination as per your suggestion p11.standby_archive_dest='C:\oracle\P11\oraarch\P11arch'
However , i am now getting these errors in dgmgrl log file while doing switchover.
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 756225487 DMON: CTL_ENABLE of p11
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 756225487 requires reset of LOG XPT Engine
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 756225487 on Site p11_primary
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 0 Reset Log Transport Resource: SetState ONLINE, phase BUILD-UP, External Cond ENABLE
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 0 Set log transport destination: SetState ONLINE, phase BUILD-UP, External Cond ENABLE
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 0 Executing SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_2 = 'service="(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.0.1.102)(PORT=1527)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=p11_disaster_XPT)(INSTANCE_NAME=p11)(SERVER=dedicated)))"', '   LGWR ASYNC NOAFFIRM delay=0 OPTIONAL max_failure=0 max_connections=1   reopen=300 db_unique_name="p11_disaster" register net_timeout=180 valid_for=(online_logfile,primary_role)']
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 0 SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_2 = 'service="(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.0.1.102)(PORT=1527)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=p11_disaster_XPT)(INSTANCE_NAME=p11)(SERVER=dedicated)))"', '   LGWR ASYNC NOAFFIRM delay=0 OPTIONAL max_failure=0 max_connections=1   reopen=300 db_unique_name="p11_disaster" register net_timeout=180 valid_for=(online_logfile,primary_role)'] Executed successfully
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 0 Executing SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_state_2 = 'ENABLE']
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 0 SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_state_2 = 'ENABLE'] Executed successfully
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:24 0 2 0 Executing SQL [ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH ALL LOGFILE]
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 SQL [ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH ALL LOGFILE] Executed successfully
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 DMON: site 01001000, instance 00000001 queuing healthcheck lock request
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 DMON: Releasing healthcheck master lock
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 DMON: Health check master lock conversion successful
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 DMON: a process acquired the healthcheck master lock
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 756225487 DMON: status from rfi_post_instances() for ENABLE = ORA-00000
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225487, opcode CTL_ENABLE, phase END, flags 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 756225487 DMON: ENABLE Complete, Object p11
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 756225487      enabled in State ONLINE
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 756225487 rfm_inst_phase_dispatch 16 END phase processing
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225487, opcode CTL_ENABLE, phase END
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 756225487 DMON: CTL_ENABLE operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:26 0 2 756225487 DMON: Entered rfm_release_chief_lock for CTL_ENABLE
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:29 0 2 756225495 DMON: ENUM_DRC: success. (len = 652)
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:29 0 2 756225495 DMON: ENUM_DRC operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:29 1000 2 756225496 DMON: MON_PROPERTY operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:29 1000 2 756225497 DMON: Entered rfm_get_chief_lock() for MON_VERIFY, reason 0
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:29 1000 2 756225497 DMON: chief lock convert for client healthcheck
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:29 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:29 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225497, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase BEGIN, flags 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225497, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase BEGIN
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225497, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase RESYNCH, flags 10005
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225497, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase RESYNCH
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 1000 2 756225497 DMON: MON_VERIFY operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 1000 2 756225497 DMON: Entered rfm_release_chief_lock for MON_VERIFY
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:30 1000 2 756225500 DMON: CTL_GET_STATUS operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:44 1000 2 756225501 DMON: Entered rfm_get_chief_lock() for MON_VERIFY, reason 0
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:44 1000 2 756225501 DMON: chief lock convert for client healthcheck
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:44 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:44 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225501, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase BEGIN, flags 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225501, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase BEGIN
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225501, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase RESYNCH, flags 10005
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225501, opcode MON_VERIFY, phase RESYNCH
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 1000 2 756225501 DMON: MON_VERIFY operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 1000 2 756225501 DMON: Entered rfm_release_chief_lock for MON_VERIFY
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 756225504 DMON: ENUM_DRC: success. (len = 652)
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 756225504 DMON: ENUM_DRC operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 1000 2 756225505 DMON: MON_PROPERTY operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: Entered rfm_get_chief_lock() for CTL_SWITCH, reason 0
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: chief lock convert for switchover
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:45 0 2 0 Executing SQL [ALTER SYSTEM ARCHIVE LOG CURRENT]
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 SQL [ALTER SYSTEM ARCHIVE LOG CURRENT] Executed successfully
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: posting primary instances for SWITCHOVER phase 1
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: dispersing message to standbys for SWITCHOVER phase 1
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase BEGIN, flags 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: Entered rfmsoexinst for phase 1
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase BEGIN
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: CLSR being notified to disable services and shutdown instances as appropriate for SWITCHOVER.
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: posting primary instances for SWITCHOVER phase 2
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: dispersing message to standbys for SWITCHOVER phase 2
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase TEARDOWN, flags 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: Entered rfmsoexinst for phase 2
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 RSM 0 received SETSTATE request: rid=0x01041000, sid=0, phid=1, econd=2, sitehndl=0x02001000
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 Log Transport Resource: SetState OFFLINE, phase TEAR-DOWN, External Cond SWITCH-OVER-PHYS_STBY
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 RSM 0 received SETSTATE request: rid=0x01012000, sid=4, phid=1, econd=2, sitehndl=0x02001000
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 Database Resource[IAM=PRIMARY]: SetState PHYSICAL-APPLY-ON, phase TEAR-DOWN, External Cond SWITCH-OVER-PHYS_STBY, Target Site Handle 0x02001000
DG 2011-07-11-14:39:53 0 2 0 Executing SQL [ALTER DATABASE COMMIT TO SWITCHOVER TO PHYSICAL STANDBY WITH SESSION SHUTDOWN]
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 SQL [ALTER DATABASE COMMIT TO SWITCHOVER TO PHYSICAL STANDBY WITH SESSION SHUTDOWN] Executed successfully
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 Executing SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_2 = '']
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_2 = ''] Executed successfully
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 Executing SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_state_2 = 'ENABLE']
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 SQL [alter system set log_archive_dest_state_2 = 'ENABLE'] Executed successfully
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 Database Resource SetState succeeded
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase TEARDOWN
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: posting primary instances for SWITCHOVER phase 2
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: dispersing message to standbys for SWITCHOVER phase 2
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase TEARDOWN, flags 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: Entered rfmsoexinst for phase 2
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:32 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase TEARDOWN
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 2000000 3 756225506 Operation CTL_SWITCH cancelled during phase 2, error = ORA-16751
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: CLSR being notified to enable services and startup primary instances as appropriate for SWITCHOVER.
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 0 2 0 DMON: site 01001000, instance 00000001 queuing healthcheck lock request
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 0 2 0 DMON: Releasing healthcheck master lock
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 0 2 0 DMON: Health check master lock conversion successful
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 0 2 0 DMON: a process acquired the healthcheck master lock
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: posting primary instances for SWITCHOVER phase 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: SWITCHOVER Aborted due to errors
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 0 2 0 INSV: Received message for inter-instance publication
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:47 2000000 3 756225506      Site named: p11_primary is still primary
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase END, flags 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 2000000 3 756225506      error = ORA-16751
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: dispersing message to standbys for SWITCHOVER phase 5
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 0 2 0 INSV: All instances have replied for message
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 0 2 0 DMON: site 01001000, instance 00000001 queuing healthcheck lock request
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 0 2 0 req_id 1.1.756225506, opcode CTL_SWITCH, phase END
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 0 2 0 DMON: Releasing healthcheck master lock
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 0 2 0 DMON: Health check master lock conversion successful
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 0 2 0 DMON: a process acquired the healthcheck master lock
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 2000000 3 756225506 Operation CTL_SWITCH cancelled during phase 5, error = ORA-16751
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: CTL_SWITCH operation completed
DG 2011-07-11-14:41:48 2000000 3 756225506 DMON: Entered rfm_release_chief_lock for CTL_SWITCH
Please advice.

Got a new update

My N8 received a new update today (13.0xx, and about 6.5mb). The install was a breeze, but what exactly did this update do for the phones functionality? The pre-download description simply stated "updates the phone and allows using all the new features". My question is,..WHAT features. Thanks for the clarification.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

The current update is only a minor update. Click on the link below for details.
http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/02/04/software-update-1-1-for-new-symbian-devices/

Nokia Cancelled updates for X6, 5800 and 5530

Hi,
Nokia X6, 5800 and 5530 users please Stop dreaming about Updates, Nokia was not updating these devices
Please Check the below Site (Original Blog with nokia anouncement and is edited on 25-Aug-11)
http://www.conversations.nokia.com/2011/06/29/updates-to-symbian-3-2-and-5-0/
Shiva

i think some confusion is there & i request dont jump directly to the conclusion that nokia wont release the update for these models...by striking off these models from the list it means that these models wont receive that particular update which they have mentioned in the blogpost...
Maybe they are going to release a bigger & major firmware for these models...so dont jump the gun & wait for their response....i think Nokia will release the updates as promised cos models like 5230,5233,etc have got the updates then 5530,5800& x6 are more successful models..so i think nokia wont disappoint its large no. of users....
I request Nokia to please come forward & clear the air..

Maps Gone on E6-00

Help, I was recently in Nokia Store and noticed that there was a Maps update available for my phone. I don't remember which version I was running. When I tried the update it started out with a screen that said:
"You are now getting several new map apps for your phone, and we also made you some cool new homescreen widgets."
Within a few minutes, the following error appeared:
"Sorry, we currently have network problems, please try again later."
I retried several times with the same results. I tried the update again the following day thinking the problem was with Nokia's network but I got the same results. I tried again the next day (now three days in a row) and got the same error. The next morning (today), I noticed that the Nokia Maps application is completely gone. I have no Map application at all. I am not talking about downloaded country maps, I am talking about the actual Nokia Map application and widgets.
I have tried to redownload the Nokia Map application from the Nokia Store several times but I get the same results as above with the same error. How can I get the Nokia Map application back? This is the only reason I stay with Nokia.
I am currently running:
E6-00
Symbian Anna (No, don't tell me to update to Belle)
Software Version: 021.014
SW Ver Date: 2011-05-26
Custom Ver: 021.014.217.01
Custom Ver Date: 2011-05-26
Language Set: 021.014.01.01
Product Code: 059J225
Type RM-609
Regards,
Darin

Perhaps look for "nokia_maps_3_377815.08_11wk47_b04_SR1.0_STORE.sis"
Happy to have helped forum with a Support Ratio = 42.5

Pr1.1 for C7 now out

PR 1.1 (firmware 13.0.16) now available for the Nokia C7
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/news/item/12557_PR_11_firmware_13016_now_avail.php

Hezzu wrote:
I have C7 and I do not see any sw update available.
What has happened? Has PR1.1 been so buggy that Nokia suspended it?
Just have a look at http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/02/04/software-update-1-1-for-new-symbian-devicest
If you want to thank someone, just click on the blue star at the bottom of their post

E6 with Symbian Belle?

Hi there!
I'm planning on replacing my old E5-00 with a new E6.now, i know that the phone comes with Symbian Anna but i am getting conflicting reports/messages as regards software updates.
I have read from well-known internet site that Nokia will update all its Symbian Anna devices to Belle "soon". but when i rung Nokia they said No.
i should feel and have confidence when buying a Nokia phone because they are really good on the build and battery issues. not so much on the software side i think.
so, i want to find out once-and-for-all:
1. will Nokia update their Symbian Anna devices to Belle "somehow" or in the near future?
2. will Nokia continue to support their E-series devices with software updates even without Symbian Belle?
3. should i buy an E6 now or wait for newer phones in the new year?
thank you.

Nokia E6 has a diffrent resolution and layout then other Symbian^3 (Anna) devices so probably it could take longer before Belle comes to Nokia E6 ... but at least the Nokia conversation page mentions that E6 will get the Belle update
http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/08/24/symbian-belle-the-facts-the-features-and-the-pictures/
I would call Nokia Care again and really ask them to find this out for you.
They might not be able to get an answer right away, but they should be able to find out and get back to you...
Nokia is still supporting and releasing updates for other E-series phones that are non S^3 devices, so cant see why they wouldnt continue to support the E6 no matter if it gets Belle or not. ..they recently released an update for E72 for instance

Symbian Anna...Deja Vu

I KNOW everyone is **bleep**, I KNOW everyone is disppointed, frustrated, angry....gosh the words does not cover the emotions involved...
I have gone through all the emotions...first the excitement when the news came out 'new update coming soon!'...then disappointment, followed by anger and now...a lil' bit i-don't-give-a-fruitcake' lol...
People, please realise, Nokia is a business...they make phones and they need to sell phones. They said they still have 10 phones to come out between now and approximately end of next year (2012). So you have to understand, they need to have a tactic in place, to get people to keep buying their phones. Otherwise, Nokia would go bankrupt and that's a no no (business 101). So their tactic is to delay software updates, bring in 'new phones' with the new updates in place, so that this will entice new buyers. They're then told 'oh there's a new update, coming soon'. They don't care about the old customers...they've got your money already...they're not entitled to give you 'free stuff'. (they missed the memo, coz loyal fans are GOLD).
Suppose if Nokia had given the anna update at end of q1 as 'planned'. That means all the old and loyal customers would've been super happy (SUPER DUPER HAPPY). BUTTTTT, then the x7 would've been obsolete, EVEN before it had came out!!! There would be no reason for people to buy an x7, especially since it would've been super duper expensive. On the other hand, people would be buying the n8/c7/c6 coz they'd be cheap...AND have the latest software. Now this would've been very silly!!
So relax people. Nokia is stuck in a rut...they can't do anything right, because...the only options they've got are either go bankrupt really early, or...get the people angry. They simply chose the lesser of the two devils, which makes sense. The job of a CEO is to keep the company floating...Now whether this tactic will work or not...well, it got many of you to buy the n8 early to get the update...so it might work again in the future...maybe
Yes there's heaps of problems, yes you've worked hard for your money, YES YOU'RE SUPER DUPER ANGRYYYY...but that won't change the tactic at Nokia. So take it down a notch, go ahead and vent your frustrations and anger (in a sensible way...). IT IS NOKIA'S FAULT, but they gotta do what's right for them...
Hoping you all have the best of days ahead...
MODERATOR'S NOTE:
Post edited to removed discussions of speculations concerning products which have not been announced by Nokia.

mangbecak wrote:
Hey Jerspa!!
I think we can agree that symbian is dead. it's not the future. We should've seen it coming, i mean...like you said years and years but that only produced a still unfinished product. I think meego's the future.yes it's not dual core or has a super duper awesome plus and multipled amoled screen. but the clear black display is awesome when comboed with a normal amoled. no complaints there. I doubt a duo core/quad core is that important for a mobile (ok my point of view). The only thing i'd miss is the 1080i vids. but games and other apps...i'm gonna stick with my laptop/computer.
Now i'll wait for a meego with 1080i vid +30fps caf, xenon flash, and usb otg. note, that's MY dream phone...mine, not anyone elses...
oh and a good battery of course
First off: I didnt claim that symbian is dead.
Then why i rant here?
Answer:
My last phone were 3720 classic, it were fine working phone. Everything worked as expected without bugs.
Now when i take the N8 from my pocket which is premium phone and 3x more expensive than 3720 classic, the 2 first months were horrible. Everyday that "insert sim" "phone rebooting" "program crashed" stuff. Then Pr1.1 came, which still didnt provided the support. PR1.2 fixed the problems with email etc. That were only corporate stuff.
So lets talk about those leaked vids about PR2.0:
In february we saw allready working splitscreen qwerty and draggable HS + new browser. <- less than 4 months from the delivery date to market. That was impressive, but it isnt anymore since it takes 6 months to deliver that damn update. Thats unacceptable.
Lets look the PR2.0 press release in Conversations:
http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/04/12/announcing-symbian-anna-aka-pr2/
Now lets pick up the cherries:
Enhanced Browser (v7.3): <- This is new
Enhanced Ovi Maps (v3.06): <- This is allready newer
Enhanced Ovi Store (v2.06.xx) >- Same for here
Enhanced Social (v1.3) <- Same for here
So as you can see, wheres the all time spend? theres nothing new, Nokia is really lettings us like without clothes to middle of antartica with S^3 phones, the support for this is horrible.
Theres no way that any of PR team or Dev team can defend this situation until they let the iron curtains down and show us the one fact: Why it takes so long? What is wrong? AND WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO MAKE IT BETTER?
As we seen above, Skyee's team aint working at the social team, nor in maps team nor in ovi store team.
So while i debunked the all "we are working hard" claims, theres really nothing that can explain the delay.
Funny fact is that S40 phones are getting the same functionalities as S^3 so why would anybody buy this over priced N8?
I mean, Compare N8 to C6-01 that phone is 2.5X cheaper than N8. Still the N8 doesnt have ANY extra that would justify the price?. This also the thing why i am very angry.
When Comparing to E7 and N8, E7 is in lower stage in the portfolio pyramid and still its more worth, it has more functionalities than N8, same price.In the S^3 phones, N8 is the loser. Nothing really supports the price.
Also when i bought the N8, i skipped the N95 and N97* because i saw those via friends, i know that those got problems. So i hoped so much that the S^3 would be new symbian, rewritten and a os that have rid off the same old failures that N95 and N97* got in software quality.
Damn it, everything were even worse than those phones, even small basic functionalities are missing here and there. This so half baked product, Even the MP3 player is mising a EQ <- A basic function, been on phones for many years. Even N95 and N97* have that LMAO.
Theres really nothing new in this Anna update, this is why the stocks goes down, this why the sales wont go up. S^3 is the total failure in nokias history, how it can be, that the S^3 phones are in 3rd generation which fails in SOFTWARE QUALITY.
Moderator's Note: Post has been edited to remove discussion of speculations concerning products which have not been announced by Nokia.

Conversion Ver.? to 2011 [lvlbp]

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for