Convert Jpeg to Tiff

I have tons of Jpeg I need to import to Lightroom. How can I set it to convert the images to Tiff while importing.
Thank you for your help in advance.

You may want to read up on how LR works.  LR stores your originals (in your case the JPEGs).  Unlike Photoshop, it does not make any changes to your originals but stores the details of the changes in the catalog.  When you need to work on an image in an outside program or send it someplace then you export the image and the changes are applied at that time to the exported image.  The original remains untouched.  It is at that time that you can choose to export as a TIFF.  Otherwise you don't need it.  Your original image is all that you need and the quality is not affected no matter how many times you change it.
John
John G. Blair Studio
Occidental, California

Similar Messages

  • Convert jpeg to tiff prior to adjustments?

    Assuming my end product will be an 8-bit tiff sent to a lab for a high-quality inkjet print (the lab has asked for 8-bit tiffs in AdobeRGB), and assuming I start with a jpeg imported to Aperture from a point-and-shoot (i.e., no RAW available), is there any advantage to creating the tiff "right away" (i.e., from the original jpeg) before working on any adjustments vs. doing the adjustments on the jpeg and exporting as the tiff? If so, would I just export the jpeg as a tiff proir to making adjustmentns and bring it back for the editing? Also, does a jpeg's lossy compression have anything to do repeated adjustments on the jpeg in Aperture? (I am aware that there is already compression by the camera in making the jpeg, but the point-and-shoot has conveniences for some of my needs that my DSLR doesn't, so I don't mind paying that price).

    No, it does not.  You can't re-create information that is lost.  When the information the camera gathered was saved to a file, some of it was lost because of the JPG file format.  Converting to TIFF won't bring back the lost information.
    Aperture never loses Image information.  When you export, you create new files.  Depending on the specifications you select, those new files will contain the equivalent of "very little information" up to "as much information as I started with".  Converting from JPG to TIFF doesn't allow you to start with any more information, and, again, Aperture never loses it, so there is no reason to convert at any point from the time your camera creates the JPG file until you create a new file by exporting from Aperture.
    HTH,
    --Kirby.

  • Converting jpegs to tiff

    Hi,
    I have to put some photos on cd asap for submission to a magazine. They request the files as "300 dpi, lzw compressed, 8 bit tiff files". I can convert the jpegs i have into tiffs easily enough, but I haven't a clue what the rest of it means... Are these settings automatic when creating a tiff? Or do i need to do something else to the files? And is that possible with iphoto?
    Any help much appreciated,
    Alex

    Hi alex, I believe if you use Photoshop you can make these settings when you save/save as/export the image.
    iPhoto will only convert the image to tiff for you.

  • Importing/converting jpgs as tiffs

    Is there any way to import or convert jpg photos to tiffs, while retaining the original EXIF data (on the new tiff) without having to export everything and then import it again?

    There's no way to convert anything in Aperture without exporting.
    If you import and process and/or edit a photo all that happens is that Aperture records your choices in the database. There is no "modified" file. When you view the image in Aperture it's the original file with the entries from the database applied over it live. The only way to produce another file is to export it. At export you can choose what version to export, and what metadata to write to it.
    There are lots off apps out there that will convert jpegs to tiff - Preview for a start. Or check out Graphic Coverter
    Regards
    TD

  • Using Aperture to batch convert images from tiff to jpeg

    Hi there
    My first question - here goes:
    I wish to batch convert several thousand tiffs (of various sizes) to a standardised jpeg (A4 @ 300dpi). I'm looking for software to automate this process as much as possible; ideally, it would search designated folders and place the new jpegs in a (matching) new folder structure.
    Would Aperture be suitable for this, or should I consider Adobe Lightroom (or other)?
    Many thanks
    BR

    No filters.
    Solution I used was to create new project. Copy images to it. Delete old project.
    Aperture would not let me copy images from old albums to old project.

  • Edit jpegs or tiffs using Raw interface in Elements 10?

         Hello- When I was using Elements 8, I could easily edit jpegs and tiffs in the Photoshop Raw interface.
          (I know that's not the same as an image originally shot in Raw, but nevertheless it was very useful in some situations.)
          Now I'm using Elements 10, and either I've forgotten how to do it, or it can't be be done.  Can anyone give me some instruction?
    Thanks!

    Hi Dominic - Thanks for the reply ... but I think I must be missing something obvious.
    First, FYI I am using a Mac.  In Elements 8, I was doing exactly what you suggested, and it worked fine.
    With Elements 10, I see no button to switch to Camera Raw. (I can convert to Photoshop Document (PSD,) or save to Photoshop Raw, but tneither of those brings up the RAW interface. If you or anyone can point me to something I must not be seeing, please let me know!
    Thanks Again
    Dan Hall

  • Converting JPEG files to DNG in Lightroom

    Is there any advantage to converting JPEG files to DNG when I import them into Lightroom? I am trying to maintain the quality of the file.
    Would it be better to save a JPEG file as a PSD file after I import it to use it in Photoshop and Lightroom?

    (Please pardon the change of subject:)
    Fred T. said, "If you are editing a JPEG in Photoshop going from Lightroom, let Lightroom create a TIFF. "
    I am wondering how to do this. I'm just an amateur and my non-SLR camera doesn't even save RAW images. ("Yup, need to take care of that one of these days.")
    My Preferences for "External Editors" (in my case Photoshop Elements 4.0) is set as: File Format: TIFF; Color Space: sRGB; Bit Depth: 16 Bits/component; Compression: ZIP.
    When I right-click on a file, and choose "Edit in Photoshop Elements 4.0.app", and pick Edit a Copy from the dialog box, the new file that is created and passed over to PE is a .JPG file not a .TIF file.
    I get the feeling that the functionality to create a TIFF, or a PSD, only works if my original image is RAW or DNG. But perhaps I am overlooking something???
    Life would be a lot easier if I could send the file to PE as a TIFF. At present, as a workaround, I tell LR to edit the original (so it doesn't create a copy), immediately Save-As in PE as a TIFF so I don't overwrite the original, and then when I'm done editing in PE, save the results (still TIFF). Once back in LR, I have to import the new file.
    Any Thoughts?

  • Unsupported canera - JPEG or TIFF?

    Aperture 3.1.1 does not support the RAW files from my Sigma DP2s. I am storing the RAW files separately in case the camera is supported in the future. With Sigma's software, I can convert the RAW files into JPEG or TIFF and then import them into Aperture. Does it really matter whether I import the JPEG or TIFF? There is no RAW fine tuning for either. TIFF is lossless, the file sizes are larger, but there's no image quality difference compared to JPEG to my eyes. There might be a differences for larger prints, though. So, should I just import the JPEGs into Aperture to save the disk space? Any suggestions?

    Hello Chris,
    Welcome to the user-support Aperture discussion group.
    The question you ask is not an Aperture question, per se, but rather a general digital picture format question.
    The difference wouldn't be to your eyes when viewing on your screen. Even at full screen, you are probably only seeing 10% of the pixels in your image. Yes, JPEGs are good enough for most prints, but will they be good enough for all of them that you want to make? You won't know until you print them. I can often tell the difference in photos larger than probably 5x7. (My eyes are pretty in tune with JPEG artifacts. My wife doesn't notice them, though.)
    Perhaps if you answer this for yourself, you will figure out what you need:
    Why are you taking RAW photos at the start of your workflow if you aren't concerned with all the data a picture can offer at the end of the workflow?
    I.e., why start with RAW from your camera if you are just going to use JPEGs at the end?
    nathan

  • Exif tool and Export Jpeg and Tiff files

    I run Lightroom 4.4 under Apple OS X10.4.4
    When I export files Exif Tool (in Graphic Converter) under ICC header shows for Jpeg "Primary Platform = Microsoft and for = Tiff Apple; and under ICC Profile Color profile for Jpeg = HP but Adobe 1998 for Tiff.  I can see that there is a difference between the profile for Jpeg and Tiff (eg sRgb and Adobe1998) but don't follow why the Primary platform differs and shows Microsoft for Jpeg and that the jpeg profile is HP.  Can anyone explain, please, and dose it matter anyway?   Thanks  Clive

    A overview of ICC profile tags is here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/ICC_Profile.html
    Why the difference in the PrimaryPlatform tag, I don't know, it does not matter.
    The ProfileCopyright tag is HP for sRGB, Kodak for ProPhotoRGB and Adobe for AbobeRGB (1998) of course.

  • Exporting RAW to JPEG and TIFF

    Evaluating LE to hopefully improve some workflow. I noticed however, that when export to a JPEG or TIFF format the file size seems much smaller that I'm accustomed. A D100 9.5MB RAW file converts to appx 2.7Mb JPEG at 100% and appx 7MB in TIFF. Currently when I convert I get a 17-20MB JPEG. I'm I missing something in the setup or is this the larger file size LE produces.
    Murray Edwards

    Excuse me Lightroom. I currently use Portfolio 8 to review and tagged a large number of images for production. They have a conversion process that allows you to convert a NEF file to JPEG or TIFF. When converting to from a NEF file that is appx 9.5MB in size to a JPEG at 100% @300DPI which is what my clients require, it produces a a JPEG file that ranges from 17-23MB depending the amount of information. But I still have to pull that image into editing SW to do some cleanup or slight exposure adjustments. It was my hopes that by using Lightroom, I could slimline a couple of these processes. But if LR only provides a exported JPEG file size of what I've seen thus far, then I would unable to accomplish this.
    Is this better clarification of my question?

  • AUTOMATOR actions... converting Jpeg to PSD...

    Hi guys
    I am trying to find an action to convert about 10.000 photos and pictures from Jpeg to PSD... impossible to do it one by one, opening and saving using Photoshop CS... it'd take me forever!
    I was even able to download a pretty nice action from Apple called "Change File Format 1.3"... it's very good but it doesn't support PSD... only .TIFF files...
    I found another Automator Action for Photoshop CS "Photoshop Actions for Automator 1.0 " but it downloads as a .SIT file and I can't open it...
    Does anyone know where I can get an Automator Action to convert Jpeg to PSD files???
    Cheers

    Problem solved!
    Thank you guys!
    I downloaded Stuffit Express... so I was able to open "Photoshop Actions for Automator 1.0 "
    http://www.completedigitalphotography.com/index.php?p=339
    Great pack and I was able to open the .sit file and just dragged the actions to my Photoshop CS folder... and it immediatly showed up on AUTOMATOR...
    So, I just made a PSD copy of each Jpeg...
    Thank you

  • Change jpeg to tiff

    I am a new lightroom user. I have a catalog of 2600 images that are jpeg files. I would like to change to file type tiff.
    What would be the best method to get things changed?  THANKS for any suggestions.

    Geoff the kiwi wrote:
    If editing in PS or other jpegs there are very valid reasons for usin TIFFs.
    Geoff,
    the OP is talking about converting the thick end of 3000 jpegs into tiffs, and that's fairly pointless.
    It'd only make any sense (and even then not a lot) if he intends to do multiple edits/saves on the files in a non-destructive way: but if he wants that tiff benefit, the files really should be tiffs from the start - all the advantages of 16 bits' worth of data are already gone, and any "damage" to the files caused by jpeg compression will be "baked in".
    He's thrown the baby out with the bathwater if he's going from jpeg to tiff to - eventually - go back to jpeg.
    As an aside, I'd use the batch conversion function in Irfanview to do the job.

  • Jpeg to tiff - is this possible?

    Is it possible to convert a jpeg file to a tiff file
    in Aperture or any other program?
    debcoo

    Converting a jpeg to tiff sees no loss in image quality from the process as there is no compression involved in the creation of a tiff file, ie. it is uncompressed. Going to jpeg there is compression of varying degrees and therefore a loss of information.
    The real issue with the lossy compression files types, depending on how much compression is applied, is not so much the first time they are created, but rather every time you re-save a jpeg as a jpeg you throw away more information.
    It is easy to work out what size a files should be, eg 2000x3000pixels=6000pixels total, x3(RGB)=18,000(KB) or 18MB, using this allows you to get a feel for the amount of compression applied, this file saved as a tiff will be 18mb, from here you can see how much info you have lost.
    enough rambling
    Tony

  • Saving converts JPEG to PSE

    When I try to save JPEG images in PSE9 they are converted (after the final JPEG dialogue box) to PSE format.  Attempts to open the PSE image results in a "wrong format" message.  "Open as" allows me to reconvert the image to JPEG; is this normal and can it be fixed?  Also, layers are automatically flattened upon saving.  Can they be preserved for later work?

    Ahh...HA!  Thank you for this wonderful insight. I think I've got it now!
    Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:59:09 -0600
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Saving converts JPEG to PSE
        Re: Saving converts JPEG to PSE
        created by photodrawken in Photoshop Elements - View the full discussion
    Barbara B. wrote: PSD is the format to use if you will need to edit the image again in PSE.Or tiff, but a jpeg can't have layers, ever.Just for my benefit -- I've always assumed that a PSD file will include at least some PSE-usable info that a TIFF file doesn't.  Am I wrong? Ken
         Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3976629#3976629
         To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/3976629#3976629. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
         Start a new discussion in Photoshop Elements by email or at Adobe Forums
      For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • How to disable the automatic conversion from JPEG to TIFF?

    I am using Keynote '09 and Safari 4 on OS X 10.6.8, and I often want to drag and drop a JPEG image from Safari to my slides. I would like to keep the image format as is, but Keynote automatically converts the image format from JPEG to TIFF, so the .key file size becomes large.
    Does anyone know how to disable this automatic conversion? Any idea? I know that I can use the original format if I save the JPEG image at a temporary location, such as ~/Desktop. But I would prefer simpler way. Drag and drop is the best.

    Indeed, having the same problem here.  A simple PPT file that was 1 MB ballons often to more than 10 x the size as a KEY file.  If you rename to zip and open, one notices lots of completely useless "PLACEHOLDER" and background files that occupy several MB in total, plus some small JPGs have been converted to very large PNGs.  This is truly annoying. 
    A similar lack of "file size economy" is present in all applications apple produces for the ipad/iphone.  Images I uplodaded to the photo app become very large (often 10 x bigger).  WTH apple?  Be more economical!  Even my 64 GB ipad2 is starting to feel small with your waste.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I fix Hard Drive Bottle Necking?

    I'm running: SanDisk 480gb SSD - OS 6 3TB Western Digital Internal 7600RPM Drives Intel i7 4770K Haswell 3.5GHz CPU MSI Z87 XPower Mobo 3 MSI Gaming N760 Video Cards (Running in triple SLI) 32gb G. Skill Trident X RAM Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Right

  • Displaying some records at a time

    does anyone know how to display only 10 records at one time from the database followed by the next button to display next 10 etc?

  • I just did a recommended updated on my mac Mini and it has deleted my entire media library! Please Help!!!

    I received the update notice from system preferences, so I followed the usual drill, accepting recommended update/downloads and restarting - one of those being an iTunes update. Once the mini was restarted I went to my iTunes movie library to watch a

  • One of my playlists in iTunes is not syncing correctly to my iPhone

    When my iPhone updated to iOS 7 a while back, I started having a problem with one of my Playlists. I was willing to ignore it for a while, but it's become enough of a nuisance that I'm seeking a solution. I have a smart playlist called "Unrated", whi

  • Java interface with Crystal Reports

    Post Author: [email protected] CA Forum: JAVA Hello everyone,I need to build a Java interface for JSP to interact with crystal reports.Could anyone recommend any book or forward me the url's where I can find the related material with examples. Eagerl