Convert to Grayscale fixups changes weight of rule from 2 pt. to 1 pt.

Convert to Grayscale fixups changes weight of rule from 2 pt. to 1 pt.
If I Print to Grayscale it works fine.
Any ideas?

Can you be more specific - can you reproduce the result with different variables? (Create a new document)
What version of Acrobat, including update level (ie; AA Pro 9.5.1)
What Operating system?
Are these line strokes or frames to a polygon?
What authoring software?
Can you host the file such that someone else could attempt the same fixup?

Similar Messages

Enable/select/change to Business rules from Calc Manager in App settings

Hi all,
Somehow we are Unable to Expand the Planning Node in Essbase Administration Services (EAS) Console When Creating Business Rules. I am not sure is it
I am not sure, is it because of one of the application has calc settings as calc manager in under application settings in dev environment, but in other environment all applications set it as Business Rules.
I was trying to change from Calc Manager to Business rules in App settings, but it is grayed out and not able to change to Business rule from calc manager.
Please suggest me.
Thanks,

If it say been set incorrectly then you may need to update one of the relational tables for the application.
Table - HSP_SYSTEMCFG
Field - CALC_ENGINE_OPTIONS
Values - 1=HBR, 2=CalcMgr
Restart the planning application web app service after making changes.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Changing the automatic Distribution Rule from Per to Full

Hello SAPians,
I have a scenario where the Customer is maintaining the Moving Average Price (I know this is not SAP suggested, I am in the process of convincing to move from moving avg to Std) for the Semi-finished goods and finished goods.
It is Product Cost by Order scenario where Process Orders are using and the settlement rule to the Material and distribution rule is "Per" (Periodic). The main reason Customer had this Per was they would not be able to settle the Order once they settle it in full.
But due to increased issues in month end atctivities due to thie 'Per' settlement (settlement of Process Orders not settling properly in the last month due to the failure of Batch jobs and other reasons). I want to suggest them to use Distribution Rule 'Full' instead of 'Per' because of the following advantages considering the above scenario.
1. The 'Full' settlement can be settled if the Order is not in Teco or closed status any number of times as long as there is the Variance sitting on the Order.
2. The 'Full' Distribution rule will not create issue if the variance is sitting on the Order in the closed period because when you do the settlement in the next period, system will allocate the variances from the last period to the Material Receiver in the current Period(I have not yet tested this scenario) and has not been. (Yeah I know there will be issue if the Material has been moved out of inventory before the settlement happens, they have another set up to update the Material prices manually by keeping the track of cost of Material).
3. So the config change will be the Product cost by Order -> Manufacturing Order-> Define Cost-Accounting-Relevant Default Values for Order Typ --> change the Default rule from PP1 to PP2 'Process orders (periodic settlement)'
Please let me know if what I am thinking is wrong based on this sceanrio and also please give me some more insight if I am missing any points.
Thank you very much for your time!
-Harter.

Hi Balaji/Ajay,
Could you please help me in understanding the effect of Variances if I change the Order type to FULL in this scenario (Moving Average price for Finished good Material)?
I checked the configuration and the Variance is only Total Variance that is settling to FI and COPA.
Also client is more concentrated on Variance accumulated per year and not per month.
Let's say I have Order in Period 9 where the actual debits on the Order are $1000 and actual credits are $1200 where balance (variance) is $200 and suppose I missed the Period 9 settlement and I want to settle this Order in Period 10 where I had $100 variance in that Period 10
Period         Variance on Order                Status
9              $200                   missed
10              $100                   not yet
So now when I settle the Order in period 10 (with FULL as settlement type), it settles $300 instead of $100 variance. So if this is the case, if I look at the Variance data, yes the variance data is wrong but if I look at yearly perspective, it looks right but I think I am missing something here, right?
Also what happens if the Order is open more than one year and the same scenario happens, the Variance will be posted to new year which is again issue, right?
Am I in the right direction?
Please advice.
Thank you,
-Harter.

Word docs with bitmap drawings converted to grayscale

I'm still using Acrobat/Distiller 5 on Windows 2000 Pro to prepare press ready PDFs of word 2000 docs with black & white line drawings (600 dpi bitmaps). I've always used the default "Press" job option file and simply printed to the distiller printer that is installed with Acrobat. Been doing this without any problems for years. I had some computer problems recently and had to change to a different machine. Now when I print, the resulting PDFs have those 600 dpi bitmaps converted to grayscale images. I've tried every setting I can think of to make it go away. Like I said, I've never had to change anything from the default job options file. I've tried printing the postscript to a file, then distilling, always the same. BTW, fonts look good. I know there is a solution because this same thing popped up 2 or 3 years ago and it got solved then, but I can't figure it out this time. Nothing has changed wth the docs, but a new install of Acrobat on different hardware, same OS. Help please -deadline looming.
Thanks, Dave

To all those having trouble converting documents to pdfs, I did some research and found a work around.
Go to File and choose Save & Send. Then choose Create PDF/XPS document. Click the Create button. PDF is generated.

How to convert illustrator file containing a photograph to grayscale when the "convert to grayscale" option is grayed out?

It's been several years since I've done any design work at all. I recently got a job as a designer, and on my first day I had to create an ad in illustrator 5.5 (required to be in illustrator) for print in a black and white publication. There was even an ad template to use. I placed the photo and tried to use the "convert to grayscale" option but everything under the edit colors menu was grayed out. I know it's because of the photo. In the end I changed the photo to grayscale in photoshop and replaced the image, but I know there is another way around this. Can someone please help me figure out how to fix this issue?
Thank you so much in advance!

If the placed image is linked, Edit Colors will not allow conversion to grayscale; however, an embedded image will work just fine. The flyout menu in the Links Panel allows you to embed the image.
Peter

Implications of changing weighting of Periods

What are the implications of changing the weighting of periods from 4-4-5 rule to daily basis????
Kindly suggest.

>
Mangesh Desai wrote:
> Currently the credit check is availbale at the sales order level in the system and if I want to change the credit management settings so that credit check will be available at the delivery level.
>
>
> What are the implications of changing credit check from sales order level to delivery
Hi,
No Implications simple credit check will not happen order level it will happen delivery level .
*system will not conceded at order level open order will not be calculated
Best Regards,
venkataswamy.

Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

Hi Experts:
I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
Thanks and regards!
Manuel

Hi,
Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector.
When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type is always PER (periodic).
Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
regards
Waman

Massive change of settlement rules in Sale order

HI,
CAN ANYONE ADVISE ME ON THIS TOPIC:
I NEED TO "REFRESH" THE PROFITABILITY SEGMENT IN THE SETTLEMENT RULES OF THE SALES ORDER, AS SOME OF THE CHARECHARISTICS WERE CHANGED AND AS LONG AS I USE THE "OLD" SETTLEMENT RULES IT GIVES ME THE OLDER CHARECHATERISTICS.
I WAS THINKING OF DOING A MASSIVE CHANGE TO SETTLEMET RULES - BLOCKING THE PREVIOUS SETTLEMENT LINE AND OPEN A NEW ONE
DOES ANYONE HAS AN IDEA OF HOW TO DO IT ?
THANK YOU
AMALIA

Hi,
1. Please check your customizing in SPRO -> Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions-> Account Assignment/Costing -> Automatic generation of settlement rules.
2. Have a derivation rule in COPA (KEDR) which will post the changed value to COPA during settlement. If the settlement rule is not automatically adjusted and if you don't change the old value afterwards manually on the profitability segment screen of the settlement rule final derivation (at time of creation of the CO-PA line item) would overwrite the wrong char value for the line item - without any impact on the settlement rule itself.
regards
Waman

Converting to grayscale?

Hi,
I'm doing an experiment and as preprocessing would like to convert my set of PNG images into grayscale using the following ratios
New pixel value = .31R + .59G + .10B
While I'm experienced in Java and server side apps, I've never done much client work. The vast area of java.awt.image classes are at the moment a bit inaccessible.
Can someone recommend the current (1.4) way of doing this? I'd really like to use my grayscale ratio rather than the default grayscale ColorSpace (though it'd be nice to know what ratios it uses, too).
Any tutorials/books/links would be appreciated, too! Thanks!
- Everett

...just to note, the paper that I'm implementing for a class project says the following on its conversion:
"In the preprocessing stage each COIL image I = (R, G, B)
was first transformed into a gray-level image E through the
conversion formula
E = .31R + .59G + .10B,
rescaling the obtained gray-level in the range between
zero and 255."
"Support Vector Machines for 3D Object Recognition"
Pontil & Verri, 1998
I'd be happy to also know how in 1.4 to convert to grayscale in general! :)
Thanks,
Everett

Change Document splitting rule

Our company has been live with the new GL and document splitting for 3 years. The original splitting rule was set to split on the Business Area. However we would like to change the rule to split on Profit Center instead of Business Area. Is it possible to change the splitting rules without adversely effecting the system?

Hi Michael,
There is no harm in discontinuing the active rule but activating the inactive rule is really a big deal and SAP doe recommend this because it has potential threat. See below example.
Only Business Area active as Document Splitting rule.
Invoice was posted where there was profit center not populated for some reason and system did not give any error since it was not active field.
Now you activate profit center as document splitting characteristic
You clear the invoice posted above, system will give error like Document Splitting: Item for clearing not found which is irresolvable by the way of confguration change for which data has to be migrated using cockpit and that has to be done under SAP's Consultancy only.
If you want activate Profit Center as a Document Splitting Characteristic then go ahead but do not select it as a Mandatory Field
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Change in the Rule in /801 not working

Hello All,
I want to make a change in the existing rule by including the company code logic which is my requirement.
Current Rule is as below.
In ZNP1 for /801, OUTWPPERSG,
(Employee Grp)
RTE=TKSOLL
RTE-TKAU11
RTE*KGENAU
RTE/TKDIVI
ADDWT *
3 (Employee Grp)
RTE=26
RTE-TKAU11
RTE*KGENAU
RTE/26
ADDWT *
Iam trying to change the above rule as below.
/801, OUTWPCOMPY,
XXXX
OUTWPPERSG
I get the error as soon as I create OUTWPPERSG under my company code.
The error is 'Variable argument may only be 8 characters long' and Iam unable to create anything further.
Request your help on this. I want to include the company code for sure.
Regards
Vijay

Dear Vijay,
Decision operation OUTWPCOMPY always use Four character for Personnel Subarea or Costcenter, so add "" at the end of your company code, say your company code is "ZZZ", then your rule would be like after the OUTWPCOMPY, add ZZZ then include OUTWPPERSG to validate the Employee group. It will work.
Good Luck.
Om.

Error Message When Converting to Grayscale in Adobe 9

When I convert a PDF to grayscale via Advanced/Print Production/Preflight all of my pages have the following text printed on the top: All problems according to Preflight profile Convert to grayscale.
Does anyone know how I can get rid of that? The conversion works great but I don't want that text included.
Thanks in advance!

Thank you for your response. These forums are specific to the
Acrobat.com website and its set of hosted services, and do not
cover the Acrobat family of desktop products. Please visit the
following forums for any questions related to the Acrobat family of
desktop products:
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bbeda8b/

Change the Settlement Rule

Hi Experts,
In the settlement rule for the Process orders, the system creating the rules with the category 'OIT' (Order Item) but i want it to be changed to 'MAT' (Material) how and where do i change the same. i know that it cant be changed in Settlement rule for the Order.
thanks
Regards
Suresh

Hi rasuresh,
When I read down the the comments all the way down and back to your question, one question arise in my mind, why do you want to change the settlement rule to be MAT?
You said the your order is a Process Order, meaning that in one process order it can generate more than one out put. Please check the material master of your product via MM03 on MRP2. Check, is the co-product indicator activated? If yes, then click on tab Joint Production icon. There, in the joint production indicator showing what items will be produced during processing of the products.
By indicator Joint product, by default the receiver Item category will be set to OIT in the settlement rule. What you see in the distrubution rule receiver are the proportion of cost based on setting of joint production in the MRP view 2.
I don't think, this is as a problem. It is as what should be as a process order.
It would be different if your order is Production Order or order type PP01, then the receiver will be MAT
Hope this help you.
Best regards,
Irhasni

Planning Server Requires Restart to Show Changes to Business Rules

Planning Web Services Requires stop ,and delete "server/Planning0/tmp" files in weblogic domain ,restart to Show Changes to Business Rules or New Business Rules.

Hi,
Can you please confirm that your RMI services are working fine or not
Thanks,
Avneet

CS4: Convert to Grayscale grayed out

Trying to convert an Illust. CS4 document to grayscale using the manuals steps: Choose Edit > Edit Colors > Convert To Grayscale. However, all those options under Edit > Edit Colors > are grayed out (ironically ;^). I assume I have to convert something first, but what? Thanks!

>Convert to Grayscale grayed out
Oh, man... That's right up there with the timeless NY Post headline, "Headless Body in Topless Bar."
I'm sorry, I can't comment further. I'm at AI 12 (CS2), which does not have that feature.

Convert to Grayscale fixups changes weight of rule from 2 pt. to 1 pt.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for