Converting a two system landscape to three system landscape

Currently, I have a two system landscape: DEV (development) and PRD (production) in STMS
I would like to add a QAS system so I will end up with DEV-QAS-PRD in STMS
I would like to keep all data the way it is. I don't want to lose any logs or files in the data and cofiles directories.
This is how I have this planned:
-Include the QAS system in the existing Tranport Domain.(stms in QAS)
-In transaction STMS go to OVERVIEW -> Transport Routes -> Standard Configuration -> Three systems in group
and then save the configuration.(stms on the TDC)
I'm thinking this will preserrve the current log files and the corresponding data and cofile files.
If you have done this, I would appreciate any comment or advise.
Thanks.

Addition to above suggestion - Adding new system to existing landscape doesn't make any change to the data/cofiles. Process just adds additional system.
Regards,
Nick Loy

Similar Messages

ChaRM in two system landscape

Hello Everyone,
I want to implement ChaRM for BIW systems which is a two system landscape: BIWDEV and BIWLIVE . Is it posible to implement ChaRm in a two system landscape /we need three system landscape only for it.I started the ChaRM configuration work but faced certain issues over which i was told tat Charm needs three systems for implementation. Kindly plz suggest and confirm.
Regards,
Somya

Hey Somya,
2 system landscape will also work with CHARM.
CHARM can also be configured in single system landscape.
But the bottomline is you require in all 3 clients to realize charm.
These three clients can belong to same or diffrent systems altogether.
For you i would say, u will require 2 clients in BIWDEV system ( Say BIWDEV:100 as development cleint and BIWDEV:200 as Test client ).
Now you have BIWLIVE system which is our production system, so you require 1 client BIWLIVE system..
So your 3 clients are ready and Change Request management can be realized..
Please Reward with points if this postv was usefull..
Revert For ne clarifications ..
Regards,
Suzzane

ChaRM - Mainenance Cycle in two system landscape - possible?

Hi Experts,
we are trying to create a maintenace cycle with two systems.
We have a system defined as "Evaluation System" and the second is defined as "Production System".
Generally Question
Is it possible to create a maintenace cycle for a two-system-scenario?
Specific Question - Erorrs/Warnings
While checking the project we got several errors/problems:
1 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_CHARM_BASICFUNC_001 and database
2 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_SDESK_BASICFUNC_000 and database
3 No consolidation system found for EID-800 (project Z_CRM_T)
4 No track for project Z_CRM_T with log. system EID/800
5 Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for CBI-001
CTS
The transport system is configured correct - Check in STMS is OK
Question:
The comparison checks seem to be OK - is it necessary to reactivate the BC Sets?
Kind regards
Tom

Hi,
the system role for your client/systems in the logical component is very important:
- The development system needs to be defined as a Source System.
- If you don't have a QA, leave all target systems empty. If there are one or more consolidation/integration/regression systems, assign them to system role Target System.
- Your production system uses system role Production System.
The defined Development client needs a client dependent (TMS parameter CTC=1) consolidation track to the QA, or in a 2 Tier landscape to the production system. In a 3 Tier landscape you need a delivery track from QAS client to your production client. But as you wrote, TMS has been set up already. I just would like to mention all steps....
Check that all RFC connections have been set up correctly. Especially the Trusted RFC. Don't forget the Trusted RFC to client 000 ot the TMs domain controller.
In tab Systems ( transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape ):
Make sure you see all clients of your logical component. If not hit button System Role Assignment and add your System role.
Then still in the same tab: Hit button Shipment Routes and make sure, you see the complete transport track and only this track here!
After correct setup of TMS, RFCs, logical components and assignment of LC to your project:
First perform a Refresh and a Check in transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape => Change Requests. Then please recreate the maintenance cycle (and task list).
Regards,
Holger

% DB increase differs for two system from the same landscape

Hi all ,
I have done upgrade and then unicode conversion for the two system- sandbox and development from 4.6 C to ECC 6.0 with oracle 10 G and AIX 5.3
On sandbox % db( used db size in DB02 ) increase is 60 to 80 which is as per SAP figures after unicode conversion however on dev it is almost 150 % .
Has anybody faced the same problem before or can you suggest somthing for this tremendous data growth
Also what I have observed is threre are 7 tablespace on sandbox and 8 on Dev with "PSAPSR370" as the additional one on DEV ( PSAPSR3700 is different )
Please help me on this
-Ganesh

Hi Ganesh,
the database growth depends heavily on the content. Which languages do you have installed in your system and which modules are used by your company?
I think the normal growth should be in a range of zero to 30 percent. The lower end comes from the reorganization effect due to the migration and 30 percent comes due to the fact that most data is normally numeric and numbers are the same with or without Unicode. But in rare situations it could be possible to see much higher values. The reason is, that Oracle, and also DB2, are using UTF-8 encoding if you're running your system as Unicode system. In UTF-8 a two byte Unicode character could be encoded in up to four bytes. That means if your systems contains lots of double byte characters it could grow much more than 30% but it seems unusual to me.
Are you sure that nothing was wrong with your migration?
Best regards
Ralph Ganszky

Is it possible to "convert" an encrypted system to LVM

From what I understand after reading this article in the wiki LVM is an underlying layer below the partitions that you usually work with. Basically a structure on the HDD on top of which you have your partitions and file systems.
Now, before asking my – hopefully not embarrassingly stupid – question, I should probably describe my situation:
I have two HDDs here, one of which is currently in use. Both are the same model and could be used interchangeable, they contain different data though.
· The first one, currently in use, contains /boot and three encrypted (via dm_crypt) partitions which each contain one file system (2* ext4, 1* reiserfs)
· The second one, currently lying around and only being mounted occasionally, contains one big ntfs partition encrypted with TrueCrypt
I have never worked with LVM but I would like to at least broaden my knowledge with experience so I can – when I set up my next system some time – make better informed decisions. Ideally I would "convert" my current system into something that's better to use and needs less different solutions patched together than it does now.
What I would like to have is a system with both hard drives (probably more added later) to be ready after boot with my current partitions (/boot, /, /var and /home) mounted while the second, currently only sporadically used HDD, is "integrated" in /home. And all of that (except /boot of course) should remain encrypted.
I know that I have to format the NTFS drive and as it should be part of /home – which currently is an encrypted (via dm_crypt) ext4 partition – it probably needs to be ext4. I expect it to be problematic to have a Logical Volume spread across one dm_crypt-encrypted drive and one TrueCrypted though I am not entirely clear on whether the encryption would be on top of the LVM volumes or vice versa. Anyway I assume I have to decrypt the TrueCrypt drive and encrypt it again with dm_crypt. Unless that would be dumb and you suggest something different?
The second drive (NTFS wrapped in TrueCrypt) can be completely wiped if necessary (most probably the easiest approach).
Apart from "Is that possible and/or a good idea or would you suggest not to switch to LVM and do something different (integrate the second drive in my dm_crypted system maybe?)?" my question is: "How would I tackle this problem; what would be the starting point and how could I make sure I don't accidentally erase all the data on /boot, /, /var and /home as I would like to keep my current system?"
I hope it's somehow understandable what I'm trying to do, if not please do ask.
Last edited by venehan_snakes (2011-08-30 14:52:29)

I get the impression you want to do this without backing up your data - if that is the case, you are certifiably crazy and should seek help immediately.
Bet let's assume you're not crazy, and have backed up everything. The next step is to go to the LVM section of the wiki's LUKS page, and implement one of the solutions there.

Creation of trusted RFCs between two systems

Hai,
Can anyone help me to create TRUSTED RFC between two systems ie Solution Manager and the Production. To carry out Service desk facility.

Dear Mohan,
You can create RFC's in the Solution manager system using T-Code SMSY. there you find all your installed systems select the system from the left hand side under Landscape Components click on Application Server ABAP on the right hand side you will find a tab client in this screen select the client for which you want to create TRFC. Go to change mode and click on the button Generate RFC with Assistance. Carry out the wizard for creating the RFC's...

TMS configuration TWO SYSTEM LAND SCAPE

Hi
can any body help me , how to configure TMS.
i am using two systems (Development and Production), and 3 clients
DEV = 100 for develpment, 300 for Quality
PRD= 100 for Production.
here we need any transport approvel
Thanks in Advance
siva kumar
[email protected]

Hi Siva,
Logon to DEV 000 > STMS >
Define the domain controller System DEV or PRD.
Add PRD system into transport domain
Overview Systems > Create > External System
Specify Host name & SID Other parameters of the PRD. DEV will send the request to PRD system to accept the request from the DEV to add into the domain. Logon to the PRD go to STMS accept the request. In DEV system Approve the same.
Now system are in domain. DEV system STMS > Extras Distribute and Activate the configuration. There you have to specify that 2 Systems are in landscape. Specify the DEV as Development System. PRD as Production System. mention that automatically configure the transport route and distribute.
Transport route Between DEV -> PRD.
While Doing Transportation please follow my earlier reply like:
Custmozing:- Release from DEV 100 and import into DEV 300 (Quality client) and Finally import into PRD with approval.
Workbench:- Release from DEV and import into PRD
This link may be useful for reference
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/44/b4a09a7acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Reward points if Helpful.
Regards
Ganesh

We are contemplating a Mac for a family Christmas gift -we currently use a windows based laptop. Do the two systems interface? If a child starts his homework on the pc - can he finish it on the Mac? Can they both be hooked up to the same printer?

We are Mac beginners, considerin a Mac for a family Christmas gift. We currently share one windows based pc. Does anyone use a Mac AND a pc in their household? Would the two systems interface? (Can you start your homework on one system, but finish it on another?) Can they both be hooked up to the same printer? What advice would you give us as we consider this big purchase?

You may find this useful:
Switching from Windows to Mac:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2514?viewlocale=en_US
and
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2518?viewlocale=en_US
and possible even the 'propaganda bits':
Macs are cheaper to own that PCs: http://techpatio.com/2010/apple/mac/it-admins-total-cost-ownership-mac-less-pc
and: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/apple/tco-new-research-finds-macs-in-the-enterprise-ea sier-cheaper-to-manage-than-windows-pcs/6294
Why will you love Mac? http://www.apple.com/why-mac/
- Better Hardware http://www.apple.com/why-mac/better-hardware/
- Better software http://www.apple.com/why-mac/better-software/
- Better OS http://www.apple.com/why-mac/better-os/
- Better Support http://www.apple.com/why-mac/better-support/
- It's Compatible http://www.apple.com/why-mac/its-compatible/

BI 7.0, BDLS is not converting all logical systems for datasources

Hello all,
We have refreshed an ECC system, and during the post steps in BI, we were running into issues.
We've ran BDLS to convert the logical system from ECCCLNTXXX to ECCCLNTYYY, but it's was not converting for several datasources.
One in particular was causing several problems, and terminating the conversion.
0FC_CI_01. It is still hanging on to the old logical system. BDLS terminates with the following information:
Short text:
Active version of emulated 3.x DataSource 0FC_CI_01 cannot...
Basically, the exact symptom of Note 936644.
Eventually, through a series of trials, we discovered we could assign non-active sourcesystem/logical system combinations to the objects. As a result, we deleted the source systems entirely, ran BDLS to the ECCCLNTYYY, then recreated the sources.
This finally worked. What I need now is a root cause. Why would BI refuse to change the logical system of an object to an active one, but have no problem with an inactive?

Mike,
After running BDLS, you need to replicate the source system in BW, change the contents of the target host and fields for all R/3 and Data Mart(note 184754). Update the target BW system name in table T000 using SM30. Change logical system name in all BW tables using BDLS (note 325525)
Refer to the below doc for detail. Also refer to note 886102.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/805eefcd-5428-2d10-c0ab-dc27a95b2c81?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
Below note talks about similar issue.
How to change all infosources to the new source system automatically
Hope this helps.

How to check whether transport path exist between two systems in sld??

Hi,
I have two systems namely 'A' and 'B' and created business systems for both of them.Then i created transport path between the two systems.How i check whether what i have done is right in SLD.

<b>WRT to CMS</b>
am not sure with this but u can try:
1. Start CMS: http://<host>:<J2EE Engine http port>/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/tcSLCMS~WebUI/Cms.
2. Goto lansdscape configurator and check there
Message was edited by:
Prabhu S

Using Time Machine to back up two systems, OS10.8.3, and OS 10.6.8. Sometimes it backs them up, sometimes I receive this: Backup was not performed because an error occurred while copying files to the backup disc. The problem may be temporary...

Using Time Machine to back up two systems, OS10.8.3, and OS 10.6.8. Sometimes it backs them up, sometimes I receive this: Backup was not performed because an error occurred while copying files to the backup disc. The problem may be temporary...

Hello,
Thanks to the great Pondini...
http://pondini.org/TM/C3.html

BPM--cannot convert sender logical system to ALE

Hi
My Scenario is file-bpm-idoc.. Where i am getting an error saying "cannot convert sender logical system to ALE" for the BPM.
i tried entering the logical system for the BPM in adapter specific attributes but it says logical system is already being used by some other service..
So i tried header mapping in receiver agreement now the messages are failed at the intital stage before entering the BPM only only saying cannnot find recvr agreement..
My sender system BS_EXT_100
BPM IP_calldoc
Recvr system BS_EDCR/3_200
i did the header mapping for recvr agreement of BPM by selecting the sender service and entering "BS_EXT_100"
Where am i going wrong...

solved it myself.. Thanks

How to Transport G/L Accounts between two systems?

Hi,
I am trying to move the Chart Of Accounts along with Company dependent data from our Dev to QA system. I used transaction OBY9 to transport the chart of accounts however, it is only transporting chart of accounts related data and I had to re-create those accounts in Company Code.
I also tried to use FS15 and FS16 between two systems however, no luck. Could you please provide any guidance based on your experience?
Thanks,
Durgesh.

Hi John,
For activating ALE for a particular message type there are following prerequisites:
1. Set up the RFC Connection (ABAP) between two systems
2. Configure model view in Sender system
3. Distribute Model view from sender system
4. Generate partner profile from sender system (In sender system go to tcode WE20 go to partner type LS and maintain outbound parameter for message type GLMAST)
5. In receiving system go to tcode WE20 go to partner type LS and maintain Inbound parameter --> Message type GLMAST and Process code GLMA.
Save entries and the above should work for you.
Generate IDOC for one GL Account and try to send company code date for one company code first. The message will appear which says "one idoc transferred".
Regards
Kapil

BDLS is not converting DataSource source systems

After running BDLS on our BW system to convert from logical system DV1220 to ED2CLNT220 we found that the source system assignments for our datasources are not getting converted. Specifically table RSISOSMAP which holds the mapping between the infosource and the OLTP system. We did check several of our ODS's and Info-cubes and the logical system were changed from DV1220 to ED2CLNT220.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Mike...

Mike,
After running BDLS, you need to replicate the source system in BW, change the contents of the target host and fields for all R/3 and Data Mart(note 184754). Update the target BW system name in table T000 using SM30. Change logical system name in all BW tables using BDLS (note 325525)
Refer to the below doc for detail. Also refer to note 886102.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/805eefcd-5428-2d10-c0ab-dc27a95b2c81?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
Below note talks about similar issue.
How to change all infosources to the new source system automatically
Hope this helps.

Two System keychains in Keychain Access

Hi there
When I go into Keychain Access I see two 'system' keychains listed. I believe they are multiple references to the same keychain. Is this something I should worry about and might it affect system performance?
Many thanks
Paul Blake
Macbook Mac OS X (10.4.8)

it's still just one system keychain. you just opened it twice. this is quite harmless. if it really bothers you quit keychain access and delete the file /users/username/library/preferences/com.apple.security.plist. then start keychain access and there will be just one system keychain there.

Converting a two system landscape to three system landscape

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for