Converting Managed to Referenced: how keep folder structure?

I am considering converting my managed lib to referenced, and have been experimenting with a duplicate library.
I highlighted "Projects" at the top of the Library view, and then relocate masters.
In the Subfolder Format box I chose "Project name"
I did the test relocation, and all the projects are in the new location in a single alphabetical list. My Folder year stucture has not carried through.
I see I could have used "Image/year/month" which might have kept the years, but would it have kept my projects intact?
Also some of my projects have images for different years in them, which presumably would be broken up by a "image year month" option".
Any inputs very welcome.

Ah I hadn't realised you wanted to relocate the entire library in one pass.
Yep folder names within Aperture sound like a great solution.
You should probably set up and test a small sample library before you press play though.
So you could arrange your projects in Aperture a bit before your started, grouping projects into logically named and ordered folders.
You could then set one of two presets: foldername/projectname or even foldername_projectname
The first should create a folder on the finder named after the Aperture folder followed by subfolders named after the project name contained within it.
So root level folder will be 2010 with subfolders project F and project C (you could add a counter to order them too)
The second should produce folders at the same finder level but with a naming structure containing both the foldername and the project name. So if the foldername was 2010 then your finder folders would be named 2010_project C, 2010 project F etc.
You could then jump back into Aperture and rename your folders and projects as before!
M.

Similar Messages

How do I move photos in a Smart Collection and keep folder structure?

HI there I am on a trial of Lightroom and loving it so far. One seemingly simple task I would like to try out is moving all my RAW files (which are all mixed up with JPGs and PSDs to a new location and keep the current folder structure.
Currently I have files strcutured like this: <main disk>\<year>\<month>\<filename>.cr2 and I would like to move these to <different disk>\<year>\<month>\<filename>.cr2
The Export functions look as if they will put them all in to one big folder? Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance.

There are several approaches to this problem. You could do this via the Folders panel in LR. You can do just about everything in the Folders panel that you can do in Explorer or Finder. Just create folder and drag and drop.
Another way is to do this outside LR use Explorer (Windows) or FInder (Mac). after you're done then go back into LR and tell LR where to find the moved files. Depending on how many you have this could be a bit tedious.
Another method is to choose the files you want then Export them as a Catalog. When you do this be sure to include the option to export the negatives. Point the new catalog at you other drive. It will recreate the folder structure during the export. Then remove the images from your present catalog. Don't delete from disk just remove. Now import from catalog and choose the newly exported catalog. This time choose the option to add the files without moving them. Once you are sure everything is back and is fine you can use Explorer or Finder to go into your original file structure and delete the files that were moved to the new drive. Be careful to only choose the moved files. If you are separating the RAWs out this should be relatively easy.
I hope that helps!

Keeping Folder structure on Ipod

Let's say I have 5 different folders in one of my directories -- each folder contained about 20 MP3's. I want to import these songs into Itunes while still maintaining the folder structure. In other words, once imported, I would like to be able to view the folders in the exact way that I view them on my PC.
Would I have to create seperate playlists for every folder and then import songs into those specific playlists? Is there an easier way?

After the playlists are created - is there a way to setup a synch so that any updated MP3's in my folders will automatically update the playlist?
For example, let's say I have a folder called Bruce Springsteen with 13 MP3's. I created a playlist called Bruce Springsteen to keep the structure. Now I add another 2 MP3's to the Bruce folder. Would I have to manually import those 2 additional files to the Bruce playlists?
Also - how can I set the Ipod to NOT synch when I plug it in. Since I have to create seperate playlists for each folder, I would rather do it manually so as to not mess up the structure.
Thank you.

Can I import and keep folder structure?

I have thousands of pics and videos. I'm willing to buy in to the whole iCloud experience (literally), but in my small experiments, I couldn't see how to import and KEEP the folders containing numerous pics. For example, if I have 1000s of FAMILY pics, TRAVEL pics, and FRIEND pics, all in separate folders. Can I import these pics (currently on Onedrive; I assume I can't import direct from Onedrive to iCloud.com?) keeping the separation and folder breakdown I worked so long to organize? Every attempt I've made, strips the folder and throws all pics in together. Yes, I know we can use clever tricks like geotags and dates to separate the photos to an extent. But most of my photos don't contain that metadata. And moreover, I've already manually done the work to my liking. Any ideas?

Import your folder structure to iPhoto, and then migrate the iPhoto Library to Photos.
iPhoto will create an event for each folder you import and name it like the folder. You can simply drag the whole folder structure onto the iPhoto icon.
When you open the iPhoto Library in Photos, Photos will create an album for each iPhoto event.

Aperture 3 : Pics managed or referenced : how can I find out ?

Hello,
can someone please explain how I can find out if my prictures in the Aperture libary are referenced or managed ?
Regards
Andreas

Andreas, if you did not change any settings in the Import panel, your original image files will we imported as managed and stored in the Aperture library. The setting is in the "Aperture" brick of the "Import" panel - check the option "Store Files". This should show "In the Aperure Library".
If you want have changed this setting and want to find out for individual images, how the originals are stored, select an image in the Browser and use the command "File > Show in Finder". This command will only be available for referenced originals.
To check the location of all originals at once, use a smart album (File > New > Smart album) or a search with the added rule: "File status is" and the setiing "Managed" or "Referenced". For a referenced library the the search with "Managed" should turn up no images and searching with "Referenced" should turn up all.
If you have a referenced library, but did not want to have one, it is dangerous, for you may have accidentally deleted origininal image files. You can use "File > Consolidate" to move any referenced files back into your library, see Aperture 3 User Manual: Working with Referenced Images
In that case, I'd recommend to check also with the search rules "File Status is offline" and "File status is missing".
Regards
Léonie

Sharing (Exporting) and keeping folder structure - possible?

I have been amassing a collection of family pictures going back into the 19th century. They are stored in iPhoto in folders by year (e.g. 1967 is a separate folder). I would like to export this as files but keep the folder structure so that relatives can just look in the 19xx folder for all the pictures from that year. Is there any way to export pictures and maintain the file structure used in iPhoto? If this doesn't work exporting original format photos is there any way to export from iPhoto and have it reflect that structure (so relatives on Mac or Windows machines can view/use them)?
TIA

Arthur,
I have not come across any applescript and I did just search again.
What I did come across was a program called iPhoto Album Extractor. It is really meant to extract albums into a folder from a damaged iPhoto Library that cannot be opened.
i downloaded it and tried it out to see if it would be a faster way to get your year albums exported. It is really quite fast.
Download the program and open it.
Choose the path by navigating to the iPhoto Library folder and choosing it.
Your albums will quickly be displayed in the left column.
Make a new folder on your desktop and label it albums.
Now highlight the album in the left column and choose "extract"
In the next window choose the folder on the desktop and then hit open.
The images in the album will be extracted/copied into a folder with the name of the album into that folder on the desktop. It is really quite fast. I did this while iPhoto was closed.
iPhoto Album Extractor
Lori

Can I keep folder structure at import??

Hi,
I am a new User auf Itunes. On my harddisk i have several folders sorted by topics. Can i keep this folder structure when i import the songs into itunes? When I tried it yesterday all songs were in the main folder in itunes. I dont want to sort these songs again.
Is there any possibility to keep this folder structure?
thank you !!!!!!
ingo

If you have music organised in folders before you installed iTunes and you want to keep you music where it is, go to:
Edit>Preferences>Advanced>General
Find the check box "Copy files to iTunes Music folder when adding to library"
If you uncheck this box, iTunes just stores the location of the file and does not copy it into the iTunes Music folder.
There is also a check box called Keep iTunes Muisc folder organised. If this box is checked, iTunes organises files in the iTunes Music folder into folders by Arist / Album. It does nothing outside the iTunes Music folder.
It is important not to move files in the iTunes library yourself or iTunes will loose them. iTunes does not watch folders like some other music players.

Import Scenarios - Keep folder structure

When I import a scenario folder the scenarios get inserted into the root of the Scenario pane and lose the folder they where in - Is this normal behaviour ? Is there a way to keep the folder structure?
Its a royal PITA to drag and drop again as im working with a work repos over a WAN and its slow.
Cheers
Alastair

I agree that its a pita and it is the only behavior. With several developers working in parallel, we have this problem all the times. A few people wont approve touching the Work repository directly but I would suggest creating a procedure to update the Work repository to update the parent id of the scenarios that dont have any parent id set. This can be done after you import all the scenarios and they stick on the root level.

Export multiple folders while keeping folder structure

I want to export multiple folders at one time. I select the folders in LR and then all the photos in those folders. When I look at the exported photos they're all lumped together (and the keywords are gone, if I do one folder at a time the keywords remain)
Any way to keep the folder structure while exporting multiple folders?
Thanks

You can use a publish service such as this one: Jeffrey Friedl's Blog » Jeffrey’s “Folder Publisher” Lightroom Plugin

Home sharing photos - keeping folder structure

Hi,
I am sharing my photos from my Windows 7 PC to my Apple TV (latest model). Is there a way to keep my folder structure? I have over 17 000 photos sorted into folders, and having them all listed on a single screen is simply ridiculous. Surely I can do this?
I am using iTunes 10.6.1.7
Cheers
Alix

Alex,
I understand completely, this drove me nuts as well.
I wrote a small Python program to take advantage of Junction Points to hack a workaround. Since you're a lecturer in Computer Science, you shouldn't have any trouble taking this and modifying it as you need. It allows you to leave your pictures organized as you wish (mine are YYYY/MM/Event) but creates a set of junction points in a separate location that provide the separation at one directory level. For example:
original picture folders:
2012\09\Labor Day
2012\09\Something Else
would create the following junction points all in one directory and point them to the corresponding original folders:
2012
2012.09
2012.09.Labor Day
2012.09.Something Else
I apologize for not following standard Python naming conventions and such, this was my first python program and I haven't gotten around to reading the recommendations yet.
The program relies on Junction Points created using:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896768.aspx
import os
from subprocess import call
def getTargetDirsToDelete(directory, namesToIgnore) :
          # This could be one line, but this was my first Python venture and I needed to easily test each step
          dirs = os.listdir(directory)
          dirs = [os.path.join(directory, item) for item in dirs ]
          dirs = [item for item in dirs if os.path.isdir(item)]
          dirs = [item for item in dirs if not os.path.relpath(item, directory) in namesToIgnore]
          return dirs
sourcePath = 'Drive:\\FolderWithPictures'
targetPath = 'Drive:\\FolderForJunctions'
junctionPath = 'Drive:\\PathToJunctionFolder\\junction'
#remove old target dirs
oldTargetDirs = getTargetDirsToDelete(targetPath, ['iPod Photo Cache'])
for oldTargetDir in oldTargetDirs:
          print ("Removing Junction " + oldTargetDir)
          call([junctionPath, "-d", oldTargetDir])
# get sourceDir to ignore
sourceDirToIgnore = os.path.join(sourcePath,'iPod Photo Cache')
for dirpath, dirnames, filenames in os.walk(sourcePath):
          if dirpath != sourcePath and not str.startswith(dirpath, sourceDirToIgnore) :
                    # get the full path of the junction point source
                    makeSourcePath = dirpath
                    # get the full path of the junction point target
                    makeTargetPath = os.path.relpath(dirpath, sourcePath)
                    makeTargetPath = makeTargetPath.replace('\\', '.')
                    makeTargetPath = os.path.join(targetPath, makeTargetPath)
                    print ("Creating Junction Point at " + makeTargetPath + " pointed to " + makeSourcePath)
                    call([junctionPath, makeTargetPath, makeSourcePath])
Hope that you (or someone else) finds it useful.
- Sean

Copy playlist to usb-stick and keep folder structure

Is there an easy way to copy a playlist from iTunes to a USB-stick (for use in the car)? The folder structure of artist > album> track should be kept.
If you simply use drag and drop, iTunes copies all songs into one folder.

"Files to Folder Scripts
This is a collection of two scripts: Alias Files to Folder... which creates an alias of each file of the selected iTunes tracks in a user-selected location, and Copy Files to Folder... which will copy the files of the selected iTunes tracks to a user-selected location."
It appears the first one just puts an alias in a single folder. The second one looks like it copies the files to a single folder which is pretty much what the OP is doing already with dragging.

How to change location of files (folder structure to storing in iPhoto lib)

I need help.
I thought I was smart, but as is always the case, I find out that I am not
I did not trust iPhoto at first. So I retained my images in my 8 years of folder structure (by year and then subfolders of months).
My lib is getting large, 7000 plus images, and when importing images (I do not have the setting for imported images to be stored to iPhoto Lib) and wanting to delete some, I find it more work than is necessary.
Bottom line: Can someone tell me if there is a way to change the setting (of course there is) but also to reimport, or move, my images that are already in iPhoto (but are really just previews referencing to my folder structure) so that they will reside in the iPhoto Lib?
When I import it finds duplicates...if I say do not import then it does not go any further...but if I say "yes, import duplicates" then it brings them in as duplicates...which means I have two copies, but only one retains all of the keywords etc.
Another bottom line: I want to retain my keywords in my current library, but move all images into the iPhoto lib instead of my folder structure. I can do this from this date forward, but I want to get the entire lib to be this way.
Help?

read through this thread - it should help you
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1125431&tstart=45
Larry Nebel

How to Display folder structure in Content repository as a tree model

Hi,
I have a requirement in which i need to display a hierarchical folder structure in UCM as a hierarchical model in my portal. Which approach should I follow. Expecting suggestions.. I'm using jdeveloper 11.1.1.5.
Thank you

Sorry , my earlier reply was a bit hasty...
So do you need a navigation model based on a UCM content query ?
Or
Would the document manager taskflow work ?
And you don't need any MDS customization (Terribly sorry for my post above). The default behavior of the document manager is to display the folder structure on the left and the contents on the right.
After you add the DocManager taskflow, go to its properties in composer and make sure the layout is selected as "Explorer". Once you do this, you should notice that a new split pane has appeared, and its collapsed by default. Save the page and open the split pane to see a tree structure of the folder hierarchy in UCM.
Would this work for you ?
-Jeevan

Project Folder Structure.

Ok, this is a question that possible has more then one correct answer however I would like to know your opinions about this one. On the internet (google, ant documents, maiven, etc) they have different standards on how the folder structure for the project must be. However I have my own ideas on the folder structure for the project itself. I usually divide it as follows.
app
   +-- src
   +--config
   +-- lib
test
   +-- src
   +--config
   +-- lib
bin
docHowever I do understand that the above may not the best soltution. Does anyone have like a prefered way of how create the folder structure?

Ok, this is a question that possible has more then
one correct answer however I would like to know your
opinions about this one. On the internet (google,
ant documents, maiven, etc) they have different
standards on how the folder structure for the project
must be. However I have my own ideas on the folder
structure for the project itself. I usually divide
it as follows.
app
+-- src
+--config
+-- lib
test
+-- src
+--config
+-- lib
bin
docHowever I do understand that the above may not
the best soltution. Does anyone have like a prefered
way of how create the folder structure?I usually have something like this (I very seldom have web applications, but the structure of those might look a bit different)
app
   +-- module1
         +-- src
         +-- classes
         +-- javadoc
         +-- test
               +-- src
   +-- module2
         +-- src
         +-- classes
         +-- javadoc
         +-- test
               +-- src
   +-- config
   +-- libKaj

Converting from Managed to Referenced Library-File Structure?

I'm about to convert my fully managed library (170GB) in Aperture 3.6 to a referenced library. I understand I select the files and then relocate the masters. What's the best way to do that if I want to maintain some semblance of the Aperture files/folders structure in the Finder environment? Wha't the best way to select all files- just go to "Photos" folder and select all?
I understand that the file structure in Aperture should remain unchanged. What I don't want to happen is for all my photos to just be dumped into a folder on my hard drive with no organization. Within Aperture they are primarily stored in folders (years) containing projects (months) which have albums (various shoots in a given month). If I select all photos in library, does Aperture recreate its internal folder, project, album structure as folders in Finder?
As I recall, there is an option when relocating masters to put them in various folder structures. Is there an option to keep the internal Aperture folder structure? I'd like to make the managed to referenced conversion in as few steps as possible and ideally maintain the same or very similar folder structure.
Thanks, Steve

Images are not files.
Images are what you see in Aperture.
Files are data containers, represented in various ways in the OS X Finder.
Aperture is a database of Images.
Finder is a database of files.
Just as the structure of your Aperture Library ("Library" = database; to the detriment of their users, Apple insists on cuteness over accuracy) is for you to create to meet your needs, the structure of your Finder database is for you to create to meet your needs. Many OS X users' file needs are similar, and so OS X comes with Finder pre-designed and populated.
Concerning yourself about the _file_ organization of your Images' Originals is, imho, time wasted. You didn't care about it when they were managed. There is little reason to care about it when they are referenced.
I detail some of this in this reply to a similar question.
Do whatever comforts you. But note the following:
- You cannot (as Frank has already answered) duplicate in a file manager the structure you have in your Image manager. The Images in Aperture are not files, and in important ways they are not filed like files.
- Aperture provides robust tools for managing your Images' Originals. You can move them in and out of the Library at any time, and you can relocate them to another location outside your Library at any time.
- Don't ever use Finder to perform any operations on your Images' Originals. You should use Aperture and use only Aperture to perform any operation (other than back-up) on your Images' Originals.
- Speaking of backing up: you must backup Referenced Originals yourself. Neither Aperture's Vault feature, nor backing up your Library, backs up Referenced Originals.
Unless you have specific reasons for doing otherwise, I recommend sticking to "one Project for each shoot", and, if referencing your Images' Originals, filing them under a top-level Finder folder by Project, with one Finder folder for each Project.

Converting Managed to Referenced: how keep folder structure?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for