Converting to DNG and picture resolution

I am importing Nikon D200 NEF file into lightroom and converting them in DNG.
DNG file are converted into 240 dpi instead native D200 300dpi.
Do I have control in lightroom with will set my resolution 300 dpi after converting.

Ok but if I use Crop tool in PSCS3 with front image option I would lake to have 300 dpi and not add another step before printing 4x6 at 300 dpi (1200x1800)

Similar Messages

  • RESIZE option in LR4's Convert to DNG and DNG Converter 7

    Besides the option for lossy compression I would love to see the Resize option from LR4 Beta's Export dialog in DNG Converter 7 as well as in LR4's "Library>Convert to DNG" function.
    In the wake of cameras like the Nikon D800 and others with huge image files and easy option to convert to smaller sized DNGs would be very helpful.

    Mark Alan Thomas wrote:
    Right. I'm not into the whole lossy compression thing. I like the idea of making smaller raw files, but I want the megapixels which remain to be good megapixels.
    Now I get what you mean. Apologies.
    That would be interesting and of course I absolutely second it: DNG with variable resolution but lossless compressed!
    That would be a great option. So why not just offer both independently - resolution and compression?
    Just don't disable the "Resize to fit" switch when "Use Lossy Compression" is off.
    I understand the perils with this and I also understand that it's kind of counterproductive to the thought of a RAW/DNG file. But in the end, isn't it about flexibility and not purity of a system? Bring on some big fat warnings that make it clear to the user: "you are now leaving the path of a non-destructive file format!" But let the user decide.
    For more safety you could even add the need to unlock this functionality in the Preferences.
    Side note:
    There have been plenty of high-res DSLRs so far, Nikon D3X, Canon 5D MkII, 1Ds MkIII, Sony SLT-A77, SLT-A55, NEX-7, Alpha A-850 Alpha A-900 - but none of them seems to have stirred up the discussion about need and sanity of high megapixel DSLRs like the D800 now does.
    It's probably because it's the highest so far and Nikon offers no lower resolution RAW as Canon does. What most seem to agree on however is that the high megapixel count can be nice for many and provides flexibility, but it can also be a burden at the same time.
    No idea why Nikon don't offer sRAW like Canon do. But considering all this, a flexible option for smaller DNGs with individually settable compression and/or Resize would be a tremendous accomplishment!

  • Auto Import feature lacking convert to DNG and move to subfolders...

    Folks,
        As many of you may be aware, when setting up a folder for auto import, LR 3.3 does not give you the same options as you might see in the regular import functionality.  Namely, the ability to convert to RAW images to DNG on the import as well as move to subfolders is not available.  This is a real bugger for me as I have a nice new Eye-Fi Pro card that I have setup to dump all images from my camera to a "watched" folder which is then imported into LR automatically.  Unfortunately, auto import doesn't solve the issue for me, so I am back to doing the same old import routine I had done before which is tethering the camera back up via USB (or popping out the card and mounting it instead) and use the regular import feature.
        I realize a lot of the design impetus for auto import is around tethered usage, where a photographer may want to see the images as fast as possible, but why would Adobe cripple the auto import functionality deliberately.  Give the auto import the same functionality as the regular import and let the customers decide which works best for their setup.  Geez!!
    ~David

    I believe I watched a tutorial that indicated that Lightroom now downloads the raw files first and then does the conversion. This speeds up the download process and enables you to go back to my room to do other work more quickly. I cannot comment on the speed of the conversion because I don't convert to DNG. But my thoughts are that 700 raw files will take some time to convert.

  • Photoshop Elements 4 and picture resolution

    I just got PSE4. Problem printing pictures bigger than 72dpi. I import a picture from iPhoto (1.4meg), do the PSE4 changes and print. The print (Epson RX700) is at 72 dpi. When I ck in PSE4, I am losing resolution on the import. I am not cropping. Doing layers though.
    *where can I go for more information?
    *any obvious problems in importing?
    *how to I work with two file sizes? Large to print and small to work on?
    Thanks,
    Don

    Don:
    Regarding the dpi of your image make sure you're not getting confused with how the resolution is reported. As long as the pixel dimension doesn't change you haven't lost resolution. For example the photos coming out of my camera are 1600 x1200 x 300 dpi. When I open them with PS (it's the same as with PSE) the size is usually reported as 1600 x1200 x72 dpi. What is different is the size in inches. Opening and checking the size of the file before importing into iPhoto it would be 1600 x1200 x 300 dpi and the size in inches 5.33" x 4". After in and out of iPhoto the the size in inches has changed to 22.2" x 16.66". It's all smoke and mirrors. Just change inches to the size you want in PSE and the dpi will change accordingly. It's all smoke and mirrors.
    As far as the color difference that's much more complex and what you're doing is on the right track. I've set PS up to manage color and set sRGB as the default color profile. Also set it for my monitor, etc. The printer is a different animal and I've not mastered it quite yet. My Epson printer is very good just as it came out of the box. My Canon printer I've never gotten it really close.

  • Convert to DNG and Backup at same time

    I have not been able to figure out how to do this ...
    I'd like to import my NEF files and do the following
    1) Import NEF files as DNG
    2) Backup converted DNG files (don't need the NEF)
    3) Be able to specify the Exact folder used for the backup.
    (I know how to backup the NEF files to a LR specified subfolder)

    Does any know ?

  • DNG and Color Negatives

    This may seem to be out in left field but here goes...
    I've been using custom camera profiles in LR to help get better color when scanning color negative film using Vuescan from my Nikon scanner. Vuescan can output a DNG file that contains the metadata tags for Make and Model so I can shoot a color chart, scan it and run it through profiling software (either DNG profile editor or Colorchecker Passport) then use the profile in LR's Camera Calibration to help zero in the color. It works fairly well.
    Now I'm scanning larger negatives on an old Imacon Flextight, which is producing great scans as far as dynamic range and sharpness are concerned but doesn't have profiles for the new film I'm using. I figured I could use the same strategy as with Vuescan if I could get the metadata tags set in the tiff files then convert to DNG and make a profile. I've been using Exiftool to set every Make and Model tag I can write to, and it shows up in LR's metadata pane as being set, but the profiles aren't matching up with the file (i.e. they don't show up as options in the Camera Calibration drop down).
    What am I missing to get these to match up?
    Thanks.

    Can you please send me two examples:
    1.  One of your old DNGs (for the case where the profile shows up correctly in Lr).  Please also send me the profile that works with this DNG.
    2.  One of your new DNGs (which doesn't work).  Please also send me the profile that you're trying to use with this DNG (which isn't showing up).
    With these 4 pieces, I can figure out what's going wrong.
    [email protected] (yousendit.com, dropbox, etc.)
    Thanks.
    Eric

  • Converting to DNG but saving the original sequence # of image

    When I am shooting, I keep a log of what I shot using the sequence number assigned my camera. When I convert to DNG and rename my images and renumber, is there a way to keep the original numbers visible so that I can easily refer to them so that the data can be input easily? Otherwise transcribing the information from my logs will be tedious.

    Yes, the DNG converter will keep the "document name" plus allow the addition of numbering (right side , top box and menu).
    I always keep camera original name but add subject name to that on import into LR. When clients want dngs along with their originals, then it is a simple matter to add enumeration, among several choices, in a renaming process.
    I should add that I do NOT use the dng convertor within LR. I prefer the standalone convertor, because it can be working in the bkg while I continue work in LR. Dng conversions are not exactly fast.
    I should also add that I discourage clients from using DNGs unless they use cameras that receive little support in most apps. I have had unexplained troubles doing 1:1 preview rendering in LR with some dngs. That may be my configuration, or it may be something in LR.

  • Slow extra steps in "Convert to DNG"?

    I have seen several similar questions with no answers:
    It appears that in the new LR6/CC, when I "convert to DNG and Import", LR CC first imports all of the CR2 files to the destination folder, THEN converts the RAW files to DNG while simultaneously trying to process the Preview images. This is a departure from previous versions and seems to drastically slow down the import/convert process. It took nearly 2 hours to import 700 20MB CR2 and convert them to DNG. I am running OS X 10.10.3 on a late 2013 27-inch iMac with 16 GB RAM. Is this a bug, or is this what Microsoft would call a "feature"?

    I believe I watched a tutorial that indicated that Lightroom now downloads the raw files first and then does the conversion. This speeds up the download process and enables you to go back to my room to do other work more quickly. I cannot comment on the speed of the conversion because I don't convert to DNG. But my thoughts are that 700 raw files will take some time to convert.

  • Batch convert Raw files to DNG via Library's convert to DNG issue

    I have LR 4.4 running on a Win 7 64 bit PC...
    I selected 4 RAW files (CR2) to convert to DNG via the Library modules 'convert to DNG' and then delete the CR2 file.
    It converted only the last of the 4 files and left the other 3 untouched as CR2 files.  Can LR not batch convert the RAW files in this manner??
    Dave

    I tried again to convert the remaining 3 CR2 files to DNG by selecting the 1st file and shift clicking on the 3rd file in the film strip and then via 'Library-Convert photo to DNG.  I have Delete originals after conversion checked.
    This time it converted the 1st file and left the other 2 unchanged.  It seems to perform the operation on the 1st file selected...the first time when I tried this on the 4 original files I had clicked on the last file and then shift clicked on the first on in the series.
    BTW...I have LR4.4, Win 7 64-bit, 16G ram, Pentium 7...
    For what it's worth, I also noticed that when I "round-trip" a file to CS6 and then SAVE the file it should bring me back to LR with the new file placed next to the old one in LR.  Mine does not.  The new file is not shown and I have to synch and add photo's to have it show in LR.  Another issue...
    Thanks for checking on your end.  I suspected LR should properly batch the conversion as it did for you and that I had an issue.  With the Nik suite and Perfect Effects 4 installed I'm hoping not to have to do a complete uninstall/reinstall...what a pain (sigh).
    Dave

  • Is it wise to keep the Nikon camera files "DSC's"  after downloading them and converting to DNG files via Adobe converter for lightroom use. In other words do the DNG files have all the raw data I would ever need in processing or should I save the camera'

    Is it wise to keep the Nikon camera files "DSC's"  after downloading them and converting to DNG files via Adobe converter for lightroom use. In other words do the DNG files have all the raw data I would ever need in processing or should I save the camera's DSC files?

    DNG files do not contain some metadata supplied by the camera, which can be used by the manufacturer's software. Thus, if you don't keep the original Raw photo, you will lose this information.
    If your 1000% sure you're never going to use the manufacturer's software, then this isn't a problem. But who can be sure what software you will be using 10 years from now?

  • Trouble with CR2 and converting to DNG

    I am new at using camera raw files.  I recently got a Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D as well as Adobe Lightroom 3.  I tried loading my CR2 files into Lightroom by "copying as DNG."  Once I did this, the program said "the files are from a camera which is not recognized by the raw format support in lightroom."  I then tried downloading the latest DNG converter from Adobe.com to convert my files, but this program also said "the source folder does not contain any supported camera raw files."  The third route I tried was loading my photos into brindge directly from my camera and checking "convert to DNG."  This did not work either.  When I looked on Adobe's website, I saw that Camera Raw 6.3 should be downloaded for Lightroom 3, but it is not compatable with CS4.  I did not do this because I did not want to interfere with the other CS4 programs and I am not sure if this has anything to do with it (I have camera raw 5.7 I beleive)  I have also tried saving my photos to my computer, then importing them, as well as directly importing them from the camera into Lightroom.
    Can anyone help me with this?  LIke I said, I am very new to using camera raw and Lightroom and I am not sure what I am doing wrong.

    CG_1225 wrote:
    also, I am not sure why the size of the photo was so small.  Could this be part of the problem?
    Almost certainly. I suspect the file got truncated.  The header info is there, but it looks like most of the image data is just missing.
    Buy some new good quality media and do not trust the card these images came off of until you can verify them. Even if the media is suspect, a card reader might have better luck extracting all the data, so just put the media away and look at it later.
    I've said it before, but it bears repeating. It isn't about /if/ your media or hard drive will fail, but /when/.  Flash media is tricky because it can go bad in really inconvenient ways like this.  Pro cameras are starting to accept dual media so you can at least have a JPEG copy on the other media if the raw write fails. But, as suggested elsethread, ALWAYS format the media in-camera so that the firmware on the card can spread the writes out over the entire card over time, and map out bad spots as they occur.  And they always occur.  Flash media starts to fail the moment we buy it and stick it in the camera.

  • IWeb and full resolution pictures for download

    I finally got a good camera and wanted to share those glorious 12MP (3-4MByte) pictures via iWeb. I'd not paid much attention before now, but iWeb is fond of "optimizing" and reducing the size of pictures in order to save space and improve upload and download times. Even if you uncheck "optimize" in preferences, and select "download full resolution" in the photo inspector, I've found that some times you get the full multi-megabyte picture, then for reasons unknown to me, most other pictures have been reduced from 1/4 to 1/10 the original file size and the resolution has been reduced, say form 3000x4000 pixel to 768x1024 (seems arbitrary ...).
    How to deal with this. Nothing direct that I can find: uncheck optimize works for a bit, them reverts; full size download refers to the size after such "optimizing." I think it's a bug, but maybe others think it's a feature.
    My indirect work around: use your public folder on idisk in me.com. Create a folder structure to mirror your iWeb picture album structure to simplify life for your guest. Password protect it if you want some privacy.
    Then go ahead and let iWeb optimize, and select the download size you want (maybe "medium" is fine for some users, for example).
    But include on each picture or album page a hyperlink to your me.com public folder: the link will look something like https://public.me.com/<your me.com name here>. If you've specified a password, it will be requested when someone uses the link. I don't think there is any finer grain hyperlink available to your public folder - for example, to the sub folders you create to mirror your album structure.
    The public idisk options are in preferences in idisk on iWeb.
    If you only want to share a few pictures, it may be easier for the user to share individual file with a similar hyper link set up for each one using link outside the picture container object (can't be inside), or for each picture on the detail page (the comment, such as the image name, can be made a clickable element (hyper link). If you have tens or more pictures to share at once, this method is pretty inconvenient.
    The sharing options for individual files are available when you select file via idisk in me.com
    So, there it is. Hope this suggestion helps someone.
    Eddie O
    PS: Yes, I've offered feedback to Apple about this lack of flexibility in iWeb.

    If you only want to share a few of the larger files zip them and put them in a folder titled Pictures in your iDisk/Web/Sites folder. Then create a thumbnail or text hyperlink to them at http://web.me.com/MMeAccount_Name/Pictures/FileName. That way they will immediately download when the link is selected.
    A viewable version of the photo can be placed on the page and linked to the larger zipped version on your iDisk.
    OT

  • PS CC 2014 DNG and RAW 8.5 did not update with the rest of the CC package. I downloaded/installed the DNG/RAW converter but how do you install w/i CC 2014 plugins

    PS CC 2014 DNG and RAW 8.5 did not update with the rest of the CC package. I downloaded/installed the DNG/RAW converter but how do you install w/i CC 2014 plugins

    Thanks John. I have tried solutions 1 to 3 from (-http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/aam-lists-removed-apps-date.h tml) and they do not work. So I presume that all I can do is to remove all 25 CC applications and start again!
    Incidently, ( http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/ ) does not list Adobe Camera Raw 8.4 as an update even though Adobe have announced that it is available (http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2014/04/camera-raw-8-4-and-dng-converter-8-4-now-a vailable.html). The same applies for Adobe Premiere Pro 7.2.2 (http://blogs.adobe.com/premierepro/2014/04/premiere-pro-cc-7-2-2.html). If they are not available this would explain why I cannot download them but I am very suprised that Adobe didn't mention this when I contacted them.
    Anyway thanks again

  • How do I convert raw images with side car to Dng and

    How do I convert raw images with side car to Dng and preserve the sidecar info in the DNG?
    I have tons of raws + xmp sidecars that i want to convert to dng, because the raws are from different camera brands and i want to get everything simplified. so that i do not have to worry if I will be able to access the raws in the future, if I decide I want to rework some of the files.
    T.I.A.

    If the images are already in your catalog you can select them then choose Convert Photos to DNG from the Library menu. You'll be given the option of deleting the original raw files. Either way, Lr will only display the newly created DNG files.
    The alternative, which is better suited to images not already in the catalog is to use the Adobe DNG Converter

  • Copying and Converting to DNG

    Using Lightroom 3 beta 2, when importing raw files to both a primary location and a secondary backup location, using "Copy and Convert to DNG". the files are copied to the primary location as DNG, but NOT to the secondary location where they are copied as NEF (Nikon) files.  Shouldn't they be copied as DNG to both locations, or am I missing something?

    Bob,
    I think the idea behind keeping your files as NEFs is that LR is archiving the original. That wouldn't be the case if it were converted to DNG at that point.
    Hal

Maybe you are looking for