Copa authorization

Dear Friends:
Profitability analysis report (T.code KE31)has to restricted according to sales group by authorization. Is it possible?
Please advise?
Regards
MSReddy

Hi,
This Tcode KE31,
Checks for the following Auth Objects:
K_KEB_REP
K_KEA_TC
K_KEA_ERG
All these control access at the operating concern level so the control can be place at the operating concern level but i am not sure if there is a provision for Sales Group as such
Hope this helps
Manohar

Similar Messages

COPA authorization by sales office

Dear Experts
In my COPA environement we have many branches each branch is a cost center and sales office (one to one relation). In my KE30 report I want Mangers of each sales office to see their report only. In KE37 we are able to retrict users by company code but was unable to restrict by sales office. If I select the sales office in KE37, the users will be restricted if (*) is selected for sales offices, but if I choose one sales office the report will not be executed. I tried to develop a report where the sales office will be variable and should be selected in the KE30 report screen like compnay code, and period but I failed. Any input please.
Regards
Ahmed Zain Hassan

Hello Ahmed,
Please review and implement note 165087.
As soon as you created your own authorization objects in transaction
KE37 or KE97 and assigned it to a certain user the system checks the
user's authorization before he or she executes a report in transaction
KE30 or KE24.
Please read the description in transaction ORKE: > Tools > Authoriza-
tion Management > CO-PA-Specific Authorization Objects:
- Define Authorization Objects for the Information System (Text button
on the left).
Please also review and implement note 165087.
In order to analyze this issue please check the authorizations for the
relevant user in transaction SU01 and which authorization objects are
checked when this user execute transaction KE24 (> run a authorization
trace; transaction ST01).
Please ask your authorizations guy to check the customizing of the
authorization object again (on the basis of the documentation in
transaction ORKE and the authorization trace in transaction ST01).
Best regards,
Ronghua Fan

I need help getting new authorization codes for digital copies

I need help getting new authorization codes for digital copies of movies. Can someone help me out?

There's a lot of results in Google when you search for this but unfortunately refreshing the page doesn't seem to generate a different code anymore. Mine also says already redeemed

My iTunes won't authorize songs i can't re Donwnload

i recently had the hard drive on my iMac die. lost EVERYTHING. now I'm trying to put all the music on my iPad back onto this new hard drive. one problem, every single piece of data that i didn't download from iTunes won't go into it. it keeps asking me to "authorize my account' when I've already de authorized all devices and re did it all. its just music and stuff that i downloaded or have hard copies of that i don't anymore. so i need a way to get all these songs OFF of the iPad and into my iTunes or at least into the computer. can anyone help me? i just downloaded the newest versions of iTunes and the driver for my iPad, I'm hoping that changes something, though i doubt it will. I'm sure it says in fine print in the user agreement that they don't have to let unlicensed music or files into their program. if thats the case, I'm never buying another apple device as long as i live.
<Edited by Host>

somebody help mmmmeeee! Lol

More than half of the songs I've downloaded recently will allow playback because it says my computer is not authorized. When i authorize it, iTunes says my computer is already authorized. But the song still won't play. What gives?

How does one fix the problem of iTunes saying my computer is not authorized to play songs I've recently purchased, even though I continue to sign in for authorization? This is bullcrap.

Okay, that sounds like the dodgy tracks have been getting damaged during the download.
If your country's iTunes Store allows you to redownload purchased tracks, I'd delete your current copies of the dodgy tracks and try redownloading fresh copies. For instructions, see the following document:
Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
Otherwise, I'd report the problem to the iTunes Store.
Log in to the Store. Click on "Account" in your Quick Links. When you're in your Account information screen, go down to Purchase History and click "See all".
Find the items that are not playing properly. If you can't see "Report a Problem" next to the items, click the "Report a problem" button. Now click the "Report a Problem" links next to the items.

Just downloaded an album, will let me play some songs, but others are asking for me to authorize my computer. When I enter Use ID and password, comes back and says computer is already authorized. Why will it let me play some songs and not others?

Has anyone downloaded an album from iTunes Store, once downloaded, will let you play some songs, but others is asking you to authorize your computer. When I go through those steps, it tells me that the computer is already authorized, but still will not let me play certain songs??

If just some of the tracks on the album are giving you that message, that suggests that those tracks are damaged.
If your country's iTunes Store allows you to redownload purchased tracks, I'd delete your current copies of the tracks and try redownloading fresh copies. For instructions, see the following document:
Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
Otherwise, I'd report the problem to the iTunes Store.
Log in to the Store. Click on "Account" in your Quick Links. When you're in your Account information screen, go down to Purchase History and click "See all".
Find the items that are not playing properly. If you can't see "Report a Problem" next to the items, click the "Report a problem" button. Now click the "Report a Problem" links next to the items.

SAP BI 7.0 Transport issue with HR Structural Authorization DSO

Hi,
I am trying to transport HR Structural Authorization DSO Objects in BI 7.0 from Dev to QA system. The Data sources are 0PA_DS02 and 0PA_DS03. ( I am sure that there are lots of changes in Authrorization concept in BI 7.0),.
1. Please suggest me if I need to make any changes and tests before moving these authorization objects to QA system.
2. Also, do I need to take any pre-cautions while activating business content objects 0TCTAUTH and 0TCTAUTH_T (Datasources look like are from 3.x) as I am getting issue with the activation of the transfer structure for these objects?
Thanks a lot for your valuable inputs.
Regards
Paramesh
Edited by: paramesh kumar on May 5, 2009 12:45 AM

Hi Paramesh.
You can use the DSOs 0PA_DS02 and 0PA_DS03 in BI7.0 as well. You just need to use the new generation of analysis authorizations in transaction RSECADMIN.
You can use 0TCTAUTH and 0TCTAUTH_T in BI7.0, however we have experienced som problems with the 0TCTAUTH_T extractor, which dumped because of a poorly designed SELECT statement that was unable to cope with 10000 records. We have replaced it with a generic data source that uses table RSECTEXT directly.
Regards,
Lars

Authorization object for print preview

Hi
I am looking for the authorization object to restrict print of the document.
Please help me.
Regards
Raju

You can restrict with this object S_SPO_ACT (Spool: Actions)below mention activity
ATTR     Change order attributes
AUTH     Change authorization field
BASE     Visibility
COMP     Use as components of composite request
DELE     Delete
DISP     Display contents
DOWN     Download
EDIT     Change contents (currently only for composite requests)
PRNT     Print once
REDI     Divert to same printer type
REPR     Print several copies
SEND     Send to SAPoffice
USER     Change owner
You can restrict device name & type under the object S_SPO_DEV(Device authorizations)
You can restrict Restriction on Maximum Number of Pages under this object S_SPO_PAGE(Restriction on Maximum Number of Pages)

I have several songs that I purchased. They show in my library, but won't play on any of my devices - including my computer. I keep getting the "authorize the computer" prompt. My computer is authorized! I have done all the troubleshoots that are availabl

I have several songs that I purchased. They show in my library, but won't play on any of my devices - including my computer. I keep getting the "authorize the computer" prompt. My computer is authorized! I have done all the troubleshoots that are available. How do I get my computer and other devices to be able to play these songs? Almost all my songs play except for about 8 or 9.

If only some of the songs on an album are giving you the authorisation message, that suggests those song files are damaged.
If your country's iTunes Store allows you to redownload purchased tracks, I'd delete your current copies of the dodgy tracks and try redownloading fresh copies. For instructions, see the following document:
Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
Otherwise, I'd report the problem to the iTunes Store.
Log in to the Store. Click on "Account" in your Quick Links. When you're in your Account information screen, go down to Purchase History and click "See all".
Find the items that are not playing properly. If you can't see "Report a Problem" next to the items, click the "Report a problem" button. Now click the "Report a Problem" links next to the items.

Transferring purchases from iPod to new computer / Authorization

I recently purchased a new Dell laptop and downloaded and installed iTunes. I've authorized the laptop, so now i've used 3 out of my 5 authorizations (old PC, work computer, and new laptop). I bought 2 albums off of iTunes at work and was able to transfer them to my new laptop with no problems. When I try to transfer the other 15 albums I bought on my old PC, however, it says my laptop is not authorized to play them. It's obviously authorized since I was able to transfer SOME of my purchased music, so why is it saying it's not authorized?? When I called Apple support the other day at 5:50, the guy put me on hold for five minutes and then just hung up so that when I tried to call back it was after 6:00 and they were closed! Nice customer service, Apple.

There is authorization and "authorization"
I did a similar move. I replaced my Itunes server with a new build. I successfully saved off the old Itunes folder to my Network Attached Storage box and later copied that archive from the NAS into My Music on the new Itunes server.
The Itunes folder contained different types of data.
For CDs I loaded DIRECTLY into Itunes, the data includes authorization to play the data - because Itunes verified that it was an origional CD that was played directly into Itunes.
In a similar manner, if you have Itunes data that was purchased and downloaded from the Itunes Store, then you need to "Authorize" the computer with Itunes in order to play that Itunes Store procured data. This is the "you have done 3 of 5" authorization.
Finally, for CDs that I loaded into my old server via Windows Media Player, when I did a consolidate in Itunes, it went out and found the WMP data on a disk I dedicated to WMP music files, and since it was authorized in WMP, Itunes would play it. When I went to the new server, Itunes had the Itunes version of the songs in its library, but would NOT play the songs that had been migrated into Itunes from WMP until I actually connected the hard drive with the WMP files on it so Itunes could satisfy itself that it has "autorized" copies of the music. As soon as I connected the Windows Media Player data drive, Itunes did a compare and updated the Itunes versions of the songs imported from WMP to authrized and plays them just fine.
The alternative is to reload from the origional media.
Hope this helps.

Copa report selection screen

In copa reports, i selected a report, i get the following report selections
from period/year
To period/year
plan/act.indicator
version
I want to include sales group to this selection screen of the copa report.please advise.
Thanks&regards
MSReddy

Dear Friends:
In T.code KEA5, Characteristics fields KMKDGR (customer group) is already present. I want to remove the Characteristics fields which are not necessary for my report.
In field Catalog (menu path-Characteristics-change selection), I selected authorization group, sales group.
I get the following warning messages
Field KMVKGR has the same name as field VKGRP
I saved the Characteristics fields for sales group and authorization group despite the warnings and activated them.
But when i go to t.code KEA5 again (Change Characteristic overview), the fields of authorization group, sales group are not saved.
The sales group (ex:Z01) has to be defaulted when the user login.Is it possible?
How to overcome the problem?Please advise.
Thanks&Regards
MSReddy
Message was edited by:
Sridhar M

Auth. obj. controlling layout saving for a COPA report

Hello,
Could someone please guide me on which authorization object controls the capability to use the menu option : Settings , Layout, Saving... for a COPA report.
The problem is that this options appears dimmed for the users.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Best regards.
Reda Khalifa

Hi,
Could you check these authority check objects S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1.
Thanks,
NN

COPA derivation rule :more than 6 target fields

Hi ,
As per client's requirement I need to include 10 target fields in a COPA derivation rule . Now after entering 6 , I can see rest of the rows are greyed out ; it looks like SAP does not allow more than 6 as target .
I tried to find out if such limitation is mentioned anywhere in SAP documentation but I could not find ; if anyone has any reference doc on that please let me know .
Secondly , how to meet the requirement ? I can break the same into 2 separate derivation , say 6 target & related rule value in the first and in just next step another 4 targets & rule value ; the source remains same in both the step .
OR any COPA user exit / enhancement will help me accommodate all 10 targets in a single step of derivation ? as far as my knowledge goes SAP provided COPA user exits (1 to 5) will not be helpful here .
Awaiting your help ...
Regards
Indranil Sen

Dear Indranil Sen,
As per my knowledge it is not possible to mention more than 6 source and target fields for a derivation rule.
Because for that program, SAP defines that (1+5) fields for that screen.
That is the reason you are getting the gray color after 6 entries
Yes we can increase that limit but for that we need the access key.
If you have access key authorization, you can increase the limit
Reasons in detail:
Screen filed what you are looking for is:
DYNP5400-SRC-NAME-FIELDNAME
There you can enter (1+5) entries only. enhancement for that field is difficult.
So you can opt for 2nd option as you said.
Let see Mr. Waman Shirwaicar's views on this issue.
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally

Role or Profile with Full Authorization in DISPLAY MODE

Hi all,
Can anyone help me or tell me if there is any standard role or profile which has full authorization in display mode.
I wanted to assign this to all our support team for the PRD server who shud only have the display auths so that the pre-production client can be safe.
I have checked many places for this kind of activity, but found no threads on the same and also realted links.
Can anyone tell me how to get this task done....
I have also tried few possible ways which never helped me and all my efforts failed.
Waiting to hear from SDNs, for which i can assure REWARD POINTS.
Thanks to all in advance
Regards
Hari Haran

Hi,
By enabling the permission level as 'read', the authorized user/group/role can:
1. View the object in the Portal Catalog using the browse and search capabilities.
2. Open the object in its respective primary and secondary editors in read-only mode; the object cannot be modified.
3. Create instances (delta links and copies) from the object.
4. Gain access to and choose templates in the object creation wizards.
This permission level can be used to prevent portal administrators from editing a particular object, while still allowing them create an instance of the source and use the new instance in any way
Regards
Srinivasan T

Authorizations: Dynamic roles

Hello everybody,
We are going to migrate our authorizations from 3.x concept to BI-7.
With the new concept we are compelled to respect certain requirements like to include into the single user profile every InfoObject AuthorizationRelevant (that are also built-in into the InfoProvider, indented for the future analysis).
-     Certain users had only one dynamic role. In such a case we are able to restrict for instance:
o     0CO_AREA = a value;
o     every other InfoObject AuthorizationRelevant = * (every single values)
-     Certain users had two or more dynamic roles; in such a case we are supposed to:
o     ROLE 1: 0CO_AREA = a value; every other InfoObject AuthorizationRelevant, for instance 0COMANY_CODE = * (every single values)
o     ROLE 2: 0COMANY_CODE = a value; every other InfoObject AuthorizationRelevant, for instance 0CO_AREA = * (every single values)
In this particular case though we expect that the system will ignore our restrictions because it is adding the two roles in fact:
ROLE 1 is set: 0CO_AREA = a value;
ROLE 2 is set: 0CO_AREA = *.
Base on what we just described above, here they are our questions:
1.     Does exist a symbol (for instance :   >) that we can assigned to every InfoObject AuthorizationRelevant in order to cheat the system making it understand that it is there but not relevant for the authorizations (instead using *)?
2.     If not can you please suggest us another way to cope with the problem of having for a user more dynamic roles assigned.
Thank you very much
Matteo Mariniello

Hello,
I don't have a solution but I think I understood Matteo's goal which is not at all to authorized users to do anything they want to.
He wants to restrict certain tasks but when it comes for a user to have two or more dynamic roles the addition of them make the restriction useless.
As he said
Dynamic Role 1)
0CO_AREA = a value
0COMP_CODE= *
Dynamic Role 2)
0CO_AREA = *
0COMP_CODE= A VALUE
Therefore; the addition of them for ONE user is going to make the restrictions
0CO_AREA = a value
0COMP_CODE= a value
USELESS!!
Take Care
Domenico

Copa authorization

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for