COPA Derivation rule Error Message no. KE0C133

Hi
We have Fiscal Year 2010(April To March) and we are maintaining the derivation rule for the cost center in KEDR
Ane we are facing following error (Cost center validity is maintained from 01.04.2010 To 31.12.9999)
If we maintain validity period in from 01.04.2009 To 31.12.9999, then system is allowing to maintain derivation rule.
What you suggest in this Case ?
Derivation error :
Characteristic value  DIC APOPS01DMU does not exist for characteristic COPA_KOSTL (Cost center)
Message no. KE0C133
Diagnosis
The characteristic "COPA_KOSTL" ("Cost center") should be posted to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA). When the system checked the entries, it was established that the transferred characteristic value (" DIC APOPS01DMU") is not valid in CO-PA.
System Response
The data is not consistent and therefore cannot be transferred to CO-PA.
Procedure
With the function Maintain Characteristic Values, you can add characteristic values to those that are valid.
Thanks
Nilesh

Hi,
I understand you are checking derivation rule by transaction KEDR.
When you check Derivation, you can input "Derivation Date" in the bottom of Characteristic Popup screen. Please consider what the system check the validity period for e.g. cost center with using "Derivation Date".
Additionally, for CO-PA planning, please consider that CO version also have "Derivation date".
Hope tis helps.

Similar Messages

  • Replicating COPA derivation rules in BI

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement where we are creating an extractor and COPA derivation rules available in ECC needs to be replicated in BI. My doubts are-
    1. Could this be directly achieved in BI, if yes then how would we maintain sync between the ECC derivation rules and the replicated ones in BI. If there is some update on these rules, how would the respective BI rules get updated?
    2.Should this be handled during extraction in ECC itself. If yes, what is the best approach for this?
    any pointers catering to the above questions and anything related to mapping derivation rules in BI would be a great help.
    Thanks in advance for your help and time.
    Regards,
    Bansi.

    Hi AMK,
    As a protocol that is followed on this site, please do provide points in case the replies helped, this helps in motivating the people to keep posting for the queries and also helps in keeping the spirits of the team high.
    Regards
    Ashish

  • Copa derivation rule for customer group

    Hi All,
    I am currently facing an issue with Derivation rule and hope someone can help me on resolving  this.I have created a COPA derivation rule which has field as
    Source Field
    company code
    Plant
    Target field
    Distribution channel
    Condition
    customer group 3 = 18.
    so ideally with this conbination the distribtion channel gets updated
    for the sales order.
    However the issue we are facing is that the rule is working for only 1st line item and not for the others. I have also kept setting as" overwrite values only if new values found"
    e.g if we see the accounting doc of billing then
    line item 1 customer: x
    line item 2 SaLes GL: rule works fine and dist channel is updated.
    line item 3 discount GL: rule does not work.
    Have checked the derivation rule and it looks correct.
    Can you kindly suggest solution to this.

    Hi Ajay,
    Thank you so much for your reply.Please note that the GL is a cost element but the category in system is 1 and not 12.However I would like understand as to why is this happening.why does the system picks up derviation rule for a Gross sales GL and not for Discount GL(Cost element).
    The distribution channel  gets updated for sales GL when i check the prof segment of the line item, however this is not the case with doscount GL.
    I would like to understnad the implication before changing cost element category from 1 to 12 as it runs across system.
    Kindly provide some more explaination.
    thanks in advance.

  • COPA derivation rule :more than 6 target fields

    Hi ,
    As per client's requirement I need to include 10 target fields in a COPA derivation rule . Now after entering 6 , I can see rest of the rows are greyed out ; it looks like SAP does not allow more than 6 as target .
    I tried to find out if such limitation is mentioned anywhere in SAP documentation but I could not find ; if anyone has any reference doc on that please let me know .
    Secondly , how to meet the requirement ? I can break the same into 2 separate derivation , say 6 target & related rule value in the first and in just next step another 4 targets & rule value ; the source remains same in both the step .
    OR any COPA user exit / enhancement will help me accommodate all 10 targets in a single step of derivation ? as far as my knowledge goes SAP provided COPA user exits (1 to 5) will not be helpful here .  
    Awaiting your help ...
    Regards
    Indranil Sen

    Dear Indranil Sen,
    As per my knowledge it is not possible to mention more than 6 source and target fields for a derivation rule.
    Because for that program, SAP defines that (1+5) fields for that screen.
    That is the reason you are getting the gray color after 6 entries
    Yes we can increase that limit but for that we need the access key.
    If you have access key authorization, you can increase the limit
    Reasons in detail:
    Screen filed what you are looking for is:
    DYNP5400-SRC-NAME-FIELDNAME
    There you can enter (1+5) entries only. enhancement for that field is difficult.
    So you can opt for  2nd option as you said.
    Let see  Mr. Waman Shirwaicar's  views on this issue.
    Regards,
    Pavan Kumar Arvapally

  • Import rules, error message "Invalid system"

    Hi,
    When importing rules under Rule Architect - Import rules, error message "VBS is invalid system" . In the configuration tab we have system  and System Name defined as VBS, test connection successful.
    Why is it giving an error message VBS is invalid system? Please advise.
    Thanks,
    Sri

    Hi,
    Is it rule import after taking an export from other system? In that case, make sure destination system name doesn't contain any space in it.
    Also, make sure text and auth Objects are uploaded for VBS system before doing rules import.
    Regards,
    Sabita

  • How to copy copa derivation rules ( maintain rule value)

    Hi All,
    Can anyone help how to copy the copa derivation rules with maintain rule value from production to quality.

    Hello,
    Export and import of copa derivation rule is not possible.
    usually Transports are moved from quality to production as per best policy.
    Production to quality happens at the time of quality refresh.
    in case of high importance please get in touch with Basis team.
    Regards
    Lavanya

  • COPA Derivation Rules are not assigning the correct values

    COPA Derivation Rules are not assigning the correct values when we process billing documents in batch.  We currently have derivation rules defined to take the ship to country and refer to custom tables were we identify custom geographic groups (INT/DOM and EAM, AP, etc.).  The derivation rules work accurately when the billing documents are created individually, and more than 75% of them are accurate when generated in batch, but in some circumstances, it populates the derived values with the wrong field and we can not identify where or why that's happening.  It looks like it may have something to do when the ship to customer number account group is different, but that's not consistent..  Does anyone know how or where these values get populated, or have any ideas why incorrect values are appearing sporadically throughout the billing run?  Thanks!!!

    Leigh,
    Apparently the function module is changing the values for some billing docs. Check one of the following user exits, if it gets triggered and the values are changed:
    COPA0001  Enhancement for derivation in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA)
    Function Module: EXIT_SAPLKEDRCOPA_001
    COPA0002  Enhancement for valuation in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA)
    Function Module: EXIT_SAPLKEAB_001
    COPA0003  Enhancement for assignment to profitability segment (CO-PA)
    Function Module: EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001
    COPA0005  Enhancement for actual data update (CO-PA)
    Function Module: EXIT_SAPLKEII_001
    Function Module: EXIT_SAPLKEII_002
    Award suitable points if the above helps. You can also reach me at [email protected]
    Thanks
    Ajay

  • FI Validation rule error message problem at line item level

    Hello all.
    I have created a step within an FI Validation rule (OB28) at the document line item level.  I have set the  message to "E" for an error.  I have generated the validations.  When I test my step, the error is triggered, but triggered as an Information popup - warning and does not give me a hard stop.   Does anyone have an idea why this may happen?   I need this to be a hard stop but not a cancellation of the document entry.  I am using FV60 to enter my document.
    Thanks for help.
    mvp0821

    OSS note # 863267 explains answer.  Cannot create "error" message on ENJOY transactions - FV60 is included in this list.  "E" works on classic transactions.  
    Thanks for thinking about this.

  • Copa derivation rule not working for Discount GL

    Hi All,
    Kindly note that I have a distribution rule where company & plant combination is used where condtion is that customer group 3 should be 018 and then replace distribution channel to 03.However the rule is not working for discount GL posted in the billing document.
    I tried testing it in FB50 but then it does not allows me to enter plant and because of that derivation rule fails. However in my billing doc I do see a plant  against discount GL and still the rule is not getting picked.
    I had raised this issue earlier but the reply where not as expected and so I have rephraised my question.
    Kindly help me on this.
    Regards
    Pranay

    Hi Pranay
    I could not understand your req to a great detail, following are my observations
    1. There should be derivation rule in place 1st of all to derive customer group from billing doc...
    Check if Cust Group is populated in your COPA doc or not.. For this cust group should be a segment level char in KEQ3
    2. Create a derivation rule using method "Derivation".
    Source fields would be Cust Group, Plant and Company code ( I guess you want to change dist channel with this combination)
    Target field would be VTWEG (Dist Channel)....Click on the magnifying lens beside VTWEG and choose relevant radio button "Overwrite if ......."
    CLick on RULE VALUES and maintain the required Values there
    This should work...
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • COPA derivation rule for GL fields

    we are using Transaction type (BSEG_BEWAR) to store additional information for our Sales reporting. During the GL entry this field is update. I have created Derivation rule in COPA using table look up. The table I am using is BSEG. I have characteristics defined for Transaction type- WWTTY.
    when the table lookup is populated I get following fields in source as target :
    BSEG  -
    > BUKRS                                COPA  --> BUKRS
    BSEG  -
    > BELNR                               COPA -
    > BELNR
    BSEG -
    > GJAHR                              COPA  ---> GJAHR
    BSEG  -
    > BUZEI                               COPA  -
    > WWDOC ( This is custom defined in COPA)
    Assignment of Target Fields:
    BSEG ---> BEWAR                                COPA -
    WWDOC
    Still I am in seeing COPA getting updated with Transaction type value.
    Need input to solve this issue.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Ajay,
    Thank you so much for your reply.Please note that the GL is a cost element but the category in system is 1 and not 12.However I would like understand as to why is this happening.why does the system picks up derviation rule for a Gross sales GL and not for Discount GL(Cost element).
    The distribution channel  gets updated for sales GL when i check the prof segment of the line item, however this is not the case with doscount GL.
    I would like to understnad the implication before changing cost element category from 1 to 12 as it runs across system.
    Kindly provide some more explaination.
    thanks in advance.

  • COPA Derivation rule not running in background

    Hi all
    We are encountering a strange problem during derviation in document posting & creation of assets.
    We have added a characteristic value Material group to the profitability segment and have added a derivation rule in KEDR based on order.
    The rule is if the value of order number is filled then the material group is assigned a value.
    Order number          Assigned         Material Group
    Z0000000001              =                        001210
    The problem is that we have to manually go into the PA segment and click the derivation button OR just press enter to get the derivation working.
    If we do not access the PA segment area then the derivation is not carried out in the background.
    I have tried searching for notes and for some relevancy on the forums.
    I have also taken screen-shots and uploaded them, please view in order.
    Derivation Rule
    http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/Deriv1.jpg
    Document Posting(Deriv rule not picked even order is placed)
    http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/deriv2.jpg
    The PA segment before pressing enter or the button derivation
    http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/deriv4.jpg
    The PA segment after pressing the button
    http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/deriv3.jpg
    We require that the derivation runs in the background after we enter the line item details. The system is not picking the derivation if we directly post the document without checking the PA segment.
    If there is some BADI or user exit we could use to manually replace the COPA characteristics explicitly at document posting, please let me know
    Thank You

    Hi,
    You have to use the rule,
    Moves it let you copy a constant or the content of the source field to target field.
    With regards
    krishna

  • NAC - AV Definition Rule Error Message

    Hello,
    I have a NAC 4.9(3) with a Virus Definition rule for McAfee 8.8.x that is showing this error message:
    From this error, It seems that winxp and win2k are not supported by this virus definition rule (for the installation it works fine), but from the AV rule config I only can select "Windows All" so I can not exclude from there winxp and win2k.
    In the requirements config I can choose what version of windows to work with and there I didn't select winxp and win2k (just for testing) but the problem remains.
    Any ideas??
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Alfonso,
    The requirement must be corrected and made valid before it can be used. Typically requirements/rules become invalid when there is an operating system mismatch.
    The Clean Access Manager automatically validates requirements and rules as they are created. The Validity column under Device Management > Clean Access > Clean Access Agent > Requirements > Requirement List displays a blue checkmark if the requirement is valid and a red "X" if the requirement is invalid.
    Highlighting red "X" icons (if any) with your mouse reveals which rule and which check is causing the requirement to be invalid.
    To Correct an Invalid Requirement:
    Step 1 Go to Device Management > Clean Access > Clean Access Agent > Requirements > Requirement-Rules.
    Step 2 Correct any invalid rules or checks as described in Valid.
    Step 3 Select the invalid Requirement Name from the dropdown menu.
    Step 4 Select the Operating System.
    Step 5 Make sure the Requirement met if: expression is correctly configured.
    Step 6 Make sure the rules selected for the requirement are valid (blue checkmark in Validity column).
    Moreover kindly make sure that all rule configuration steps are according to the given below link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/configuration_guide/49/cam/m_agntd.html#wp1354971

  • COPA Derivation rule

    Hi!
    I would like to derive the sale commission values for rebate recipient (Table KONA) from the Agreements.
    I tried to derive from KONA using Tablelookup, there I had to give the source field for the agreements.
    So, I created the characteristic agreement using the data element KNUMA. And to derive the values for the agreements (Char), I am using the KONH tablelookup. There I had to give the source field for condition records.
    Condition record values are automatically generated by SAP.
    From which table the condition record values have to be derived.
    Points will be awarded.
    Shiva.

    Hi,
    These are the default indexed key fields and you cannot modify them or add fields of your own. If your derivation rule is more complicated, you should use the enhancement and create your own logic.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Cost model derivation rules error

    Hey PS upgraders,
    We are upgrading 4.6c to 6.0. When I m uploading the cost model from 4.6c to 6.0 thru CKCM , derivation rules are missing in 6.0.
    Does any one come across this kind of issue in 6.0.
    Thanks,
    Krishna Reddy
    Edited by: krishna.gujju on Jun 17, 2010 11:59 PM

    Hi guys,
    any idea!

  • Passing values to the Validation Rule error message

    Hello
    Help me please
    I have the following inquiry :
    I am using JDeveloper 10.1.3
    I am working on ADF and JSF environment
    I have entity object called "Invoices"
    and I have the following business rule
    " Total purchases from any supplier should not exceed 5000 $ per month "
    I am using a validation query to check for the purchases from
    specific supplier and validate the Amount.
    and I want the message for this validation rule to be :
    " Total purchases for this supplier is X , you cannot purchase more than 5000 $ "
    where X is variable depending on the supplier ?
    I used to do this in Oracle Forms and PL-SQL
    I want to generate messages like :
    Total purchases for this supplier is 6500 , you cannot purchase more than 5000 $
    Total purchases for this supplier is 5250 , you cannot purchase more than 5000 $
    ???

    I think I have to make a custom rule bean
    see "Implementing Custom Validation Rules"
    http://www.oracle.com/webapps/online-help/jdeveloper/10.1.3/state/content/navId.4/navSetId._/vtAnchor.sm0477/vtTopicFile.bcadfdevguide%7Cbcadveo~htm/

Maybe you are looking for