COPC - CKMLCP Transaction

When I executed CKMLCP transaction, some registers of the table MLCD doesn't paid on the account 69 (Cost of sales)
This happens when two register of the table MLCD have the same ''Cost Estimate Number for Cost Est. w/o Qty Structure''.  Only one register paid on the account 69.
Is this situation correct? or both register would paid on the account 69 when the CKMLCP transaction is executed.
Thanks in advance.
José Luis

Go to OBYC/COC/Chart of accounts/Valuation class and enter GL accounts
Revaluation of other consumption (COC)
This transaction/event key is required for the revaluation of consumption in Actual Costing/Material Ledger.
Revaluation of consumption valuates single-level consumption using the actual prices determined in the Actual Costing/Material Ledger
application. This revaluation can either take place in the account where the original postings were made, or in a header account.
The header account is determined using the transaction/event key COC.

Similar Messages

  • COC at the time of run CKMLCP transaction

    Hi, Experts
    When we run CKMCLP for period "7" with the parameter select "Revaluation Material, Revaluation Consumption and Set CO A/c.Assignment", the system ask COC transaction event key for finished material which valuation class is 7920, my question is the COC transaction event key use for consumption account for ROG and SFG, So why system ask COC for FG material,
    Account determination for entry 9000 COC 0001 ___ 7920 not possible
    Message no. M8147
    The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key 9000 COC 0001 ___ 7921 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
    Chart of account
    Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
    Valuation grouping code
    Account grouping code
    Valuation class
    System Response
    The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
    Proceed
    Note
    The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.
    Kindly help to solve the issue
    Thanks & Regards,

    Go to OBYC/COC/Chart of accounts/Valuation class and enter GL accounts
    Revaluation of other consumption (COC)
    This transaction/event key is required for the revaluation of consumption in Actual Costing/Material Ledger.
    Revaluation of consumption valuates single-level consumption using the actual prices determined in the Actual Costing/Material Ledger
    application. This revaluation can either take place in the account where the original postings were made, or in a header account.
    The header account is determined using the transaction/event key COC.

  • CKMLCP problem in reverse

    Hi, We have a problems with the material ledger reverse. We run for
    march 2008 but the operation wkp was bad define so we had to reverse.
    The system said that the processing completed without errors but some
    activity did not reverse. I noticed in the price different account.
    Please we need run again the process before the end of the month. But I
    don't know how to correct this bad reverse. Can someone help me?

    Hiya,
    CKMLCP only allows you to reverse the ML closing. Once the ML closing has been reversed, the CKMLCP transaction is as good as not run.
    What I mean is, you have the option of going to the Selection Screen and selecting the "Process Again" radio button, which will process that transaction again for that period.
    So while it seems that your activity has not reversed or so, once you run the Single-Level and Multi-Level determination again, the activity value should "re-calculate" once you select he radio button.
    Please let me know if that helps.
    Also, even after the month-end it is possible to run CKMLCP for a previous period. There are ways of doing it... so while you make every effort to close this by month-end, don't be too worried if you cannot finish this on time... It is too lengthy a process... so I'll dig up the SAP Note for you...
    Cheers.

  • WIP revaluation in CKMLCP

    Hi expert,
    When I run WIP revaluation in CKMLCP transaction, the articles I want to update stay in "Still open".
    I try to do this for the last period 08/2010.
    Does someone can explain me how to solve this problem.
    Thanks and regards

    Hi,
    This is probably because the materials were not closed completely in previous periods.     
    When the WIP solution is active, it is necessary to have the previous periods completly
    closed. You should check that not only the material status is closed but also  the activities
    and WIP Revaluation. CKMLCP is only finished when all lights for the materials, activities and
    WIP Revalution are green.              
    With the Wip Revaluation solution the system maintains the WIP layer tables and in order to
    get the correct values and avoid inconsistencies it is required to have previous periods
    completly closed.
    Please check the note 361236 if helps.
    Regards,
    MLM

  • Deleting of future price in accouning 1 View from material master.

    Hi,
    During month end process of CKMLCP, we have done the marking activity. so that the system updated the future price for all materails under specified plants. this is valid from 31.03.2008. by this time the system was not released the price automatically even, the valuation area (plant) is activated with automatic release. when doing of production confirmations for the current period, the system is throwing error as "future price and standard price exists". when we deleting the future price manually through MM02 transaction the systm is allowing to do production confirmation.
    Kindly suggest me any transaction code which deletes the future price in accounting 1 view of material master, which is  updated because of marking done through CKMLCP.

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply,
    We tried to delete the price through CKR1 transaction. after giving of parameters of material and plant blant screen is coming.
    i think CKR1 is useful for deleting of future price updated through costing run i.e., CK40N marking.
    But in this case when we scrutinise, this is updated through CKMLCP transaction.
    after performing of "post closing"  activity through CKMLCP,
    i think SAP has provided another Tab i.e., Mark Material Prices. by this time the system will mark future price at current periodic cost. and at the same time there is a provision to give date either manual date or select the radio button of beginning of following period in parameters tab.there is no provision for giving of valid date upto.
    may be this is useful to update the standared cost estimate with current actual.
    I am also not sure why user have given data as 31.03.2008. usually they are not suppose to do this marking, but, by mistake they have performed.
    Kindly correct me if any mistake and suggest any other way which will delete the future price in accounting 1 view of material master.

  • Error while executing the CKMLCP (Actual Costing) Transaction

    Hi Expert,
    I am getting the following Error while executing the CKMLCP (Actual Costing) Transaction through my User ID in system. If we execute the same transaction  with other user id then there is no Error. same role is assign to both user. Try to check SU53 screen shot but it show no error
    See the below error for referance:-
    Internal error in program SAPLCKML_RUN_COCKPIT_ACT
    Message no. CKMLRUN004
    Diagnosis
    An unexpected situation has appeared in program SAPLCKML_RUN_COCKPIT_ACT.
    The problem has to do with a program error - the indirect result of a program error or an inconsistency in Customizing.
    System Response
    Processing had to be terminated.
    Procedure
    Inform your system administrator
    Thanks
    Dinesh

    Hi Shyam,
    Thanks Shyam,
    I check this note this is not applicable for my system, In mention note Correction delivered in Support Package 600.
    but support Package in my system SAP_APPL 603 SAPKH60303,
    Is there any other note or solution for 603 SP
    Thanks
    Dinesh

  • Material  ledger--transaction code: CKMI &CKMLCP

    Dear All.
    I can't understand that  which differences there is between transaction CKMI& CKMLCP in material ledger. Who would like to explain to me?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi...
       You can avoid this problem by changing Price control from 'S' to 'V' and Indicator from '3' to '2'. However you should know the business requirement. If moving average price is serve the material valuation you can change.
    KK Biswas/AGM(ERP), DSP

  • CKMLLA102 error in transaction CKMLCP

    Good morning,
    The error occurs on the month end closing procedure, specifically on actual price determination (transactions: KSS2, KSII and CKMLCP).
    We only have stop errors in CKMLCP at line "Multilevel Pr. Determination" : error N° CKMLLA102.
    "The actual price for 0000002100/ELECT could not be determined" with cost center 2100 and activity type ELECT.
    Where comes this error from?
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi,
    Go to Tcode-KP26 maintain planning data for Activi/cost center .
    Give the cost center aas against activity type maintain price.This will solve your problem.
    thanks
    deepa

  • Pre-Filled Selection Criteria in Transaction CKMLCP Report CKML_RUN_STATUS

    Dear ABAP Specialists,
    i am actually searching for the origin of the data provided as costing run number while running the report via transaction in foreground. If i try to start the same report via background on SE38, i always get the information costing run number is missing.
    So can someone help me to identify which is the costing run number i am searching for or better where this is normally drawn from, so that i could possibly start this steps via job automatically in the future or at least have the information where i could get it from?
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Best regards
    Carsten Klatt

    Dear ABAP Specialists,
    i am actually searching for the origin of the data provided as costing run number while running the report via transaction in foreground. If i try to start the same report via background on SE38, i always get the information costing run number is missing.
    So can someone help me to identify which is the costing run number i am searching for or better where this is normally drawn from, so that i could possibly start this steps via job automatically in the future or at least have the information where i could get it from?
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Best regards
    Carsten Klatt

  • CKMLCP closing entry still open items

    Hi Gurus,
    Firstly we have WIPs.
    In the closing entry step we have 24 still open materials. We got the error message m8 147 "the account determination for key <chart of account name> PRM 1100  is not maintained " . I have checked the PRM acc assignment in OBYC and there is an account assignment.
    The system gives error message f5 846 also "the debit/credit indicator inconsistent".
    The number of material in ML document is 1 in the parameters. In addition all three paramaters (revaluations etc) are selected.
    I have nothing to do without opening OSS message. Here is the last chance before that. As you know we have to close the period in a few days.
    Thanks in advance for your valuable replies.
    Ahmet

    Hi,
    The problem of F5846 in CKMLCP is mostly caused by the wrong customizing 
    of account determination in OBYC. The debit or credit posting key is     
    NOT defined or incorrectly defined.                                                                               
    If message M8147 is also issued in the log, you can find which           
    transaction has problem,i.e. WPA                                                                               
    The missing entries for the posting keys can be displayed via tables     
    T030B and T030R. The posting keys can be defined in OBYC. Please         
    check the settings in OBYC according to the long text of the messages    
    in the log.                                                              
    To eliminate the problem you should maintain transaction OBYC            
    accordingly.                                                                               
    You should also maintain debit/credit indicators for posting keys.       
    Please read the sap note 1077957 for more information about this error.                                                                               
    1077957    Error message M8 147 when you make a closing entry                                                                               
    Please also check the note 908737 which provides further clarifications  
    on how the system works in step 'Post closing' in transaction CKMLCP.                                                                               
    I hope this information clarifies better the situation.                                                                               
    Best regards,                                                            
    MLM

  • Price determination 2 and S -- No material selected for CKMLCP

    Dear all,
    We have a case here that raw materials have price determination 2V, semi-finished and finished goods are 2S.
    The MM period is now 2011/07.  We tried to run CKMLCP for 2011/06 and system reponded "C+114 list contains no items".
    I have searched forum and SAP OSS.  What I found is CKMLCP will not process for 2V.  How about 2S?  Should I change all the settings to 3S instead?
    Please let me know if you have faced the same issue before and how you solved it.
    Thanks~
    Best regards,
    Sharon Chen

    Hi,
    The materials 2S (price determination 2, price control S)
    will NOT be selected for the actual price determination in CKMLCP.
    In Material Ledger you may use materials with price determination 2,
    price control V or materials with price determination 3,
    price control S. In the first case (2V), actual price will be calculated
    after each material movement, while in the second case (3S), actual
    price will be calculated with the cockpit (CKMLCP) at the end of the
    period. Only in this case, price differences are rolled-up to finished
    materials when multi-level price determination is run.
    Regarding to your problem with transaction CKMM, please keep in mind
    that CKMM was created to maintain the Price determination control field and
    not the price control only. The reason is a design issue.
    If you want to change the material from 2S to 2V you can overcome the
    change in two steps:
    1- change 2S to 3S and
    2- afterwards 3S to 2V
    or you can also use transaction MM02 to change the price control from
    S to V.
    Please check the notes about transaction CKMM which provide very useful information:
    703604     CKMM: When to change price determination '2' to '3'
    384553     Data inconsistencies after CKMM
    Best regards,
    MLM

  • Material Ledger Close (CKMLCP) -problem executing during the month

    Due to our tight closing schedule, we are attempting to pre-run the Material Ledger close (CKMLCP) process and Value Flow Monitor (CKMVFM) on the last 2 days of the month in order to catch any issues before the first workday of the close, when it is too late to do many of the normal processes that would correct the problems in our system.  The issue we are having is that some of our production plants are 24/7 and we are not getting good results in our test run due to new transactions that get posted while we are running the CKMLCP steps, resetting the material statuses.  For example between the Single level and multi level calculations for a given material, a goods movement might get posted that resets the material status from "single level calculated" back to "quantities and values entered", which leads to errors when the multilevel calculation tries to roll up the WAC variances.
    Has anyone encountered this issue, and how did you get around it?  Currently, we can only think of locking people out of the system while we are running the pre-checks, but we know the users will balk at that suggestion. 
    Thanks,
    Burns Thomas

    Hi Thomas,
    you might try to use the alternative valuation run as a simulation environment.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/d2/cb532d455611d189710000e8322d00/frameset.htm]
    an alterantive valuation run for just one month will create a copy of the ML data in which you will have no problem with material status. the calculation logic for closing is the same, also the reporting, like CKMVFM. Therefore, If you are successfull in closing the AVR that is a good indcator for not having further problems for your real data.
    best regards,
                         Udo

  • ML Closing via CKMLCP - Open material & Maximum FI Item reached

    Hi Experts,
    when i did ML closing via transaction code CKMLCP,  i found some problems:
    1, for some materials such as A, Multi price determination can not be completed. 
    2, for some materials such as B, Revaluation of consumption can not be completed.
    3, for some materials such as C, Posting closing entry failed.
    I don't know under which situation these error would happen (in other words, it's WHY), and how to solve them ( solutions).
    and, for posting closing entry, one error message is "Maximum number of FI items reached" with message no F5 727. what is the soluton to this issue?
    could you please kindly give me some hints or suggestions?
    Thanks&Regards,
    Felix Shi

    Thank you sir.
    Maximum Item issue was solved owe to your solution.
    I still have two materials open in Revaluation of consumption section in CKMLCP. the error message is :
    Material 320003277  is blocked in valuation area 7080
    Message no. CKMLVNB051
    Diagnosis
    You are trying to revaluate consumption for material 320003277 (with movement type ). This material is blocked.
    System Response
    Consumption for this material will not be revaluated.
    Please kindly teams help me with this issue!!!
    Many thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Felix Shi

  • COPA without COPC

    Hello,
    I am customizing an account based profitability analysis.
    I don't want to implement COPC module and I don't have costing data in the material master.
    Is it neccessary to do any customizing in:
    Controlling --> Profitability analysis --> Master data --> Valuation
    Thank you very much!!!

    This transaction is not supported in account-based Profitability Analysis.
    The costs of sales posted in FI at the point of goods issue are transferred to account-based Profitability Analysis as the costs of goods manufactured. Sales deductions (not statistical) are taken directly from the billing document.
    You cannot carry out the activities required for valuation in costing-based CO-PA when you customize account-based CO-PA. In addition, it is not possible to create actual line items manually in account-based CO-PA, since these line items would have no reference to an FI document.
    Whereas costing-based Profitability Analysis stores all values in "value fields", which generally represent a summary of different accounts, account-based CO-PA stores the values at the account level.
    Consequently, when you set up account-based CO-PA, you do not need to perform any activities in which you would assign accounts to value fields. This means that you do not have to maintain a PA settlement structure for postings from FI to CO-PA or for order settlement.

  • Costing run - difference between CKMLCP and CK40N

    Hi,
    Once Material Ledger has been activated for actual costing in a Plant, do we need to run costing run only using CKMLCP.  Can we use CK40N as usual to determine the future price.
    My question is can we use CK40N to plan future price, though ML and actual costing activated in a Plant Z.
    The requirement is ML and actual costing is only for Plant Z and this configuration should not disturb Global template.
    Could you suggest some solution please?
    Thanks.. Ashok

    Hi Waman,
    The purpose of ML active is, the client wants only one type of valuation.  SAP recommends actual costing as a solution.  Now, we have our global template to be implemented.  They would like to use standard costing parellel to actual costing.  This means, the client wants to maintain standard costing in parellel to actual costing.
    The solution is I should be able to run CKMLCP for all Materials (no revaluation entry for stock updation, but will take place at year end) at the same time I should be able to estimate (ck11n), run (ck40N), mark (CK24) and release (CKME) Standard Prices for all materials.  (Now the option is with Client whether they want to mark and relase Periodic Unit Price (or) Standard Price depending Material types, during the current year)  The requirement is not clear cut, but some how they want to manage their Global template.
    Now my question is, can I run normal Standard Costing Transactions for Standard Prices (though I configured those materials price determination as 3 and price control S), parellel to periodic unit prices but not valuated periodically and keeping them only for information purpose, for now?
    Sorry to confusing too much.... yet I need some firm solution to put forth my client.
    Kind Regards,
    Ashok

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cross reference in Mapping

    Hi SAP XI Experts,                   Is there any kind of mapping solution for cross referencing the fields in SAP XI Mapping types.         for ex: If u have a structure as follows:                                 Source                             

  • Error while configuring Oracle Internet Directory

    Hi All, I have installed OID according to instructions in http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E21764_01/install.1111/b32474/start.htm#BEHHHCBB I was trying to configure OID using instructions given in section 6.5 Only OID Without a WebLogic Domain at

  • Trouble disabling autoupdate in j2re install

    I am trying to install the Java 2 Runtime environment 1.4.2_04 silently via a script. Everything seems to work the way I want it to except that after it is done, there is a task in the 'run' key (hklm\software\microsoft\windows\current version\run) t

  • Same class in different package

    I am facing a design decision, I have a set of classes which defined the values of all variables. However, I realized that I need to prepare separate set of these classes for different countries (as they may vary), i.e my.package.us      PriceList.ja

  • Solution Manager for SAP BI/BW

    I have to use solution manager for an SAP BI/BW implementation. The BW client is currently in SAPERP 2005 (ECC 6.0). Is is possible to use solution manager in the same system or should the BI/BW be implemented in NetWeaver for implementing solution m