Copy Standard Functional Module

In standard FM, DETERMINE_TXJCD_EXTERNALLY. City and county are optional. What effort it takes to makes this fields as mandatory.
Please let me know.
Can I copy this Standard FM to custom funtional module and just say check the check box in export parameters.
Please let me know. Thank you.
Regards
Madhu

Hi,
My suggestion will be
Write a wrapper function module of DETERMINE_TXJCD_EXTERNALLY with the same fields
*"*"Lokale Schnittstelle:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(COUNTRY) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-COUNTRY
*"     VALUE(REGION) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-REGION
*"     VALUE(CITY) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-CITY OPTIONAL
*"     VALUE(COUNTY) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-COUNTY OPTIONAL
*"     VALUE(ZIPCODE) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-ZIPCODE
*"     VALUE(PROCEDURE) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-PROCEDURE OPTIONAL
*"     VALUE(ID_TAX_EXT) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-ID_TAX_EXT OPTIONAL
*"     VALUE(NO_DIALOG) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-ID_TAX_EXT OPTIONAL
*" EXPORTING
*"     VALUE(TXJCD) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-TXJCD
*"     VALUE(CITY) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-CITY
*"     VALUE(COUNTY) LIKE TTX_TXJCD-COUNTY
*" EXCEPTIONS
*"      TXJCD_NOT_FOUND
*"      TXJCD_NOT_UNIQUE_IN_NO_DIALOG
*"      EXTERNAL_TXJCD_NOT_REQUIRED
*"      TXJCD_PROCESSING_NOT_REQUIRED
*"      RFCDEST_NOT_FOUND
and within that wrapper function module make fields mandatory. This will reduce your effort during patches updattion. otherwise if you are copying the standard function module, then after applying the patches to original function module you need to redo the changes mannually in to your copied function module
a®

Similar Messages

Copy Standard Function modules to Z Function modules

Hello,
I have a requirement like , I need have a typical requirement where i need to copy few function modules in the same function group , in this regard i copied 4 function module and calling performs with the program name , but i am unable to achive the requirement , Function module is getting Dump,
Can any one explain the standarded function modules and place it in Z function group. or is it possible to include standard function group in to Z function group ?
How to get reslove ? please guide ...
Thanks In Advance.
With Best Regards
Naganjaneyulu.P.V

Hi Naganjaneyulu,
If you copy it will be similar to Standard. But you can modify those FMs as you like which will not be possible in standard. Also if you solely copy the FM, If that FM consists or depends on the screens or Includes which are present in the Function Group then there will be syntax errors and shortdumps. The Reason for your short dump might be this.
If you are still not happy with this approach, Kindly paste the standard FM that you are trying to clone and the short dump that you are encountering.
Thanks,
Sai

Copying Enchancement spots from standard function module to Z fun module

Hi All,
I copied standard function module SD_BACKORDER_LIST to my Z function module . But i am unable to copy the enchancement spots available in the standard function module . please give me the suggestion to copy this to my Z function module .
Regards
R.Vijayakumar

Hi Martin,
A SAP note will soon be released about this (compatible back to 6.40)
There is a light version available in 7.3 to transfer data between PFCG and ST01.
There is an optional Rolls-Royce version available for Z-codes / functions and the import parameter specific checks. The trick is to keep the original context of the call and maintain the proposals to the RFC enabled entry point, and know whether the tcode triggered it or the external caller.
There is a service delivered which is context sensitive (e.g. the message type of the IDOC determines the application authorizations needed for synchronous processing, so SAP cannot deliver SU24 reliable proposals and the ones they tried for the /SDF/ are very isolated..).
You need a "common functions" role for the basic scenarios like you have for interactive SAPGUI end-users, and then you need a runtime analyzer to perfect SU24 context sensitively. You also need to distinguish between a local BAPI (context is tcode) and remote one (context is RFC protocol, or http protocol... etc)
That comes with the SAP Note... (it is not released yet. I will update this with the number in the next weeks.)
--> Just a little heads-up and insight that there is some light at the end of the tunnel and you can even order it as a service from SAP to fix your Z-problems for you. The question happened to match that which I know SAP is working on.
Cheers,
Julius
Disclaimer : I have done many such spagetti fixes in the wild and developed the tool and services for customer scenarios together with SAP from my experiences, it is one of my favourite topics --> the Rolls-Royce version with Z-functions, hard-wired external RFC clients and configuration scenario dependent checks includes consulting fees if you want SAP to secure your own scenarios for you. The tools help this, but you cannot fully automate or propose it fro SU24 in "factory settings".

Problem in copying the function module.

Hi All,
I have to Copy the standard function modules "FI_ITEMS_DISPLAY" and "ITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS".
The Function group for both of above FM is "FI_ITEMS".
What i did is I went to SE80 ,I copied down the Function Group 'FI_ITEMS' to 'ZFI_ITEMS'.
later on i copied the standard function modules 'FI_ITEMS_DISPLAY' and 'ITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS'
to the 'ZFI_ITEMS_DISPLAY' and 'ZITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS' resp.in the same function group 'ZFI_ITEMS'.
Then i made some changes to these copied modules (I did change the structure of it_items from RFPOSXEXT to ZRFPOSXEXT in ZFI_ITEM_ITEM_DISPLAY,and same change in ZITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS but for the parameter s_item).
And finally i activated these FM..and it got activated also.
But later on when i used these FM in my report...error occured saying that -
"The name of the function module to be called is "ZITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS".
but "ZITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS" cannot be found in its function group. "
hence i thought of activating the function group ZFI_ITEMS,which was inactive before to this...but when i tried activatin this FM it was giving hell lot of errors showing conflict occured at diffrent places,I think just because of the change (structure of IT_ITEM chnged from RFPOSEXT to customised ZZRFPOSXEXT).
I am helpless in removing all this errors ...
Can anybody suggest where did i go wrong?
And what is the right way to copy the function module.?
If possible reply me ASAP.
Thanx in advance.

Hello Sanjay,
First, delete your new function group and
Do like this:
1. copy FI_ITEMS_DISPLAY to zFI_ITEMS_DISPLAY from Se37. here you find a button on the application toolbar to do it. It also asks about the Function group. GIve the FG as
ZFI_ITEMS.
Activate all the related objects
2. same for the other FM. Use the same FG. and activate the related objects.
Regards,
Naimesh

Copy the Function Module one server to another server

Hi Guy's,
Please help me How to copy the Function module from one server to another server.
Present requirement is like this, copy the FM from DRH-100 to NRH-100.
Thanks and Regards,
Sai

if it is a zfm, u might have assigned a TR when cretaing this FM.so u need to relese this TR to the desired system.contact ur BASIS for the transport lanscape.
if it is a standard FM, u better copy this FM to a ZFM and make it as RFC enabled if it is not RFC enabled and call this ZFM from the system in which want to call this FM by giving the logical system id in the destination while calling this FM.

Error in copy of function module FIEB_PASSWORD_ENCRYPT as a Z FM

Hi Gurus,
I want to make a copy of function module FIEB_PASSWORD_ENCRYPT as a Z FM.
but after coping standard FM when i am trying to activete it ,it is showing one error
*form decrypt_password does not exist.*
if possible give me the solution step by step.
Regards,
Susheel Joshi

do something susheel,
create an empty function group:ZFIEB_PASSWORD.
Now in the attribute of your ZFM, just add this name (ZFIEB_PASSWORD)in the FUNCTION GROUP section.
in the main program of this FG-- (ZFIEB_PASSWORD)i, copy the includes given in function group:FIEB_PASSWORD.
Add these codes:
*   System-defined Include-files.                                 *
INCLUDE LFIEB_PASSWORDTOP.                 " Global Data
INCLUDE LFIEB_PASSWORDUXX.                 " Function Modules
*   User-defined Include-files (if necessary).                    *
* INCLUDE LFIEB_PASSWORDF...                 " Subprograms
* INCLUDE LFIEB_PASSWORDO...                 " PBO-Modules
* INCLUDE LFIEB_PASSWORDI...                 " PAI-Modules
INCLUDE LFIEB_PASSWORDF01.
the intension is to copy all the includes from this pool.
you should be able to do it now
ags.n
Edited by: ags on Oct 30, 2009 3:19 PM

Copy Standard Fucntion module

Hi,
I am copying the standard fucntion module in R/3. My requirement is i would like to make changes for standard and create the generic. I am getting the Interface error for the function module while copying as it has related Type Group. Can anyone help by providing me the inforamtion how to copy type group for this function group.
Thanks

Sorry, it cannot be an acesskey information because i am copying. It cannot be an authoriation as i have the developer access.
It is the Function Module -> improt tab for the standard function module , they have used type groups which is not getting copied while copying the functiona module. Is there is any way which can help me to resolve this...
I am ware that it is not the ebst practice to copy but i have a small modification hence i was interested in copying rather then creating new,
thanks

Change the standard function module

The standard function module FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK will check whether an invoice/credit memo has already been posted where all of the following attributes match: Company code, vendor, currency, document date, reference number (If a reference number was entered in the current invoice/credit memo). If no reference number was entered in the current invoice/credit memo the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has already been posted where all of the following attributes match: Company code, vendor, currency, document date, amount in document currency
my requirement is
The above functionality described in the short description doesnt provide for the need within AP to check on duplicate invoices. The functionality in FI differs from the functionaltiy provided in LIV and therefor needs to be aligned. The risk of posting duplicate invoice entry is eminent since the check is dependent on all parameters. For a good duplicate invoice number check we need FI to check on Vendor and invoice reference within the same fiscal year. To modify rules, copy FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK, modify the checks and then call the copied function module from FB60. The remaining field check in the standard function module should be deleted.
how to achive this. i didn't understand the requirement .Please give me any suggestion for this.

Hi ,
I think what you are saying is the functionality given in Logistics Invoice verification is not suitable for FI Invoice.
If I am correct , then there is a configuration setting in SPRO where you set check for duplicate invoice. It has just three checkboxes
a) Company code b) Reference number c) Invoice date
so I think this configuration setting will suffice your requirement.
Please let me know.
Amit

IF statement in Standard function module PRICING

Hi,
In standard function module PRICING
I found one if statement like this.
if xkomv-kntyp na '1$' .
Plz tell me the meaning of thai '1$' value.
Regards,
Upender Verma.

Hi,
     NA means Contains Not Any ..
     if xkomv-kntyp na '1$' means .. xkomv-kntyp does not contain '1' or '$'.
     Read help on comparision operator 'NA'
Regards,
Srini.

Implicit enhancement to a standard function module.

Hi everybody.
I used an Implicit Enhancement to a Standard function module Customized_Message, at the starting of function module.
Code:
ENHANCEMENT 1 ZFK01_ENHANCEMENT4. "active version
If sy-tcode = 'FK01' and sy-CPROG = 'SAPMF02K' AND I_MSGNR = '230' AND i_arbgb = 'F2' AND I_DTYPE = 'I'.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
ENDENHANCEMENT.
The above is working fine, to the condition what i had given above code.
But my question is, can i use a implicit enchancement to a Standard function module(Customized_message).

Yes, but you should also be aware that 'F2' is a configurable message class in the IMG. You should attempt to solve your issue in that manner first.

Error in the SAP standard function module 'RSDRI_INFOPROV_READ'.

Hello Experts,
We upgraded from 3.5 to 7,0 support pack 17 .
After upgrade we are getting error
with return code 11 'Others´'.
While debugging the standard function module we found that the standard method s_r_infoprov->read is being executed with the return code = 8 (inherited_error).
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Vivek

Not sure if the parameters provided were correct,you may wish to do a sanity check
Input Parameters:
1. I_INFOPROV - This will hold the Name of the Info Cube from where we need the pull the data.
2. I_T_SFC - This parameter is in the format of Internal Table which holds the Character Info Objects we need to pull from the Source Cube.
3. I_T_SFK - This parameter is also in the format of Internal Table which holds the Key Figure Info Objects which we need to pull from the Source Cube.
4. I_T_RANGE - This is also in the format of Internal Table which holds the Selection criteria for which we need to pull from the Source Cube u2013 For example the Company Code u2013 001 and Fiscal Year Period u2013 001/2006.
5. I_T_REQUID u2013 Selection of cube data based on Request Id.
6. I_SAVE_IN_TABLE u2013 In case you need to save the data in DB table
7. I_REFERENCE_DATE u2013 This holds the current date.
8. I_AUTHORITY_CHECK u2013 This will hold the value u2018Ru2019, which is meant for READ.
9. I_DEBUG u2013 This is for Debugging mode and holds the default value u2018Yu2019.
Output Parameters:
1. E_T_DATA u2013 This Output Parameter is of internal table format, in which we can mention the output fields (For all the fields mentioned in the Input Parameter, this output parameter will hold the values).
2. E_END_OF_DATA u2013 Once the FM is executed successfully, this output parameter will hold the value u2018Xu2019, means extraction completed successfully.
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

BDC program or standard function module to change data in PFCG TCode.

Gurus,
I have programatically change the validity date of SAP security role (TCode PFCG). Are there any standard function module available for this ? If not then does PFCG supports update vida BDC programming ?
Regards,
Rajesh.

Cross-posting. Thread locked.
Please read [the rules|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement].
PS: Please clean up / follow up on all your hundreds of unresolved questions.

*Can we call a Standard Function Module inside a Zfunction module ?*

Can anyone please help me know whether we can call a Standard Function Module inside a Zfunction module ?
I tried the same (No syntax error) BUT when i activate the zFunction Module it throws the error:-
+'' REPORT/PROGRAM statement missing, or program type is INCLUDE. " +

Yes, I got the Answer -
We Can we call a Standard Function Module inside a Zfunction module.
But we need to make sure that the Function Groups are activated.
FUNCTION ZFM_TEST_NESTED_FM.
""Local Interface:
*" EXPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(EX_CONVERT_UPPER_CASE) TYPE STRING
CALL FUNCTION 'TERM_TRANSLATE_TO_UPPER_CASE'
EXPORTING
LANGU                     = SY-LANGU
    TEXT                         = 'gaurav'
IMPORTING
    TEXT_UC                   = EX_CONVERT_UPPER_CASE
EXCEPTIONS
   NO_LOCALE_AVAILABLE       = 1
   OTHERS                                    = 2
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.

Is it necessary to use the standard function modules always?

Hi All,
Suppose i can retrieve the BUSINEES PARTNER ID from the table BUT000 with the help of 'BP_GUID' field through a select query statement.
Now is it necessary to use a standard function module to retrieve the same data. what about the performance? which is the better solution. to implement our own code or to use the function module available.
Please someone clarify me about this issue.
Regards,
Sharry.

If you'd ask the question in general it's obvious that there is no good answer as it always would depend on the circumstance. However, as you've posted your question in the performance tuning forum, let's look at your question in this context first. I think it's fairly safe to say, that in almost 100% of the cases a standard function module will not be as fast as any well implemented and custom tailored code. If in doubt, just try reading the code of the function module you want to read; most likely you will find lots of unnecessary fluff in there, often they read data that you don't even need.
And as far as buffering is concerned, that can also be an issue. E.g. let's say you do a massive read of distinct business partners and you only need the data once for each partner. Obviously buffering is silly in this case and it might even slow down your program, because the implemented buffering is not necessarily well implemented. I've come across a few cases, where the buffer tables where standard tables with no efficient read access (so no sorted table or hash table) and once tons of data were buffered, it actually took a moment to look up if the record already was buffered (just to find it wasn't there yet).
Now most of the times this slowdown is not an issue as the lookup is still fast compared to the (usually) prevalent database accesses with their slower IO timing. But another factor to consider is memory consumption and why buffer data in memory (and waste it), if you can't use the buffer anyway? So when I do use standard function modules, I usually try to see what they retain in global memory, to better understand if I need to call some initialization/clearing/refresh function...
Note also that often you need to process lots of data, but don't find a standard function module for "mass access", so you need to read your object one by one. Obviously that's another good candidate for implementing your own queries, where you can process the data in packages.
So what might be the reason to use a standard function module? Well, often it's required because the logic is so complex that it would take you too much time to implement it (not to mention that we often simply don't know all the logic that's coded in there). Another advantage is that you might get independent of the data model. E.g. for IDoc interfaces SAP switched in some release the tables where the data is stored. So if you had coded your own queries to get IDoc data, they wouldn't have worked after this particular release upgrade. The standard function on the other hand, checks both the old and new tables, so by using it you would have been fine.
The one major caveat I'd give though is to always check whether the function module is released or at least documented to some degree. I.e. if it's not released, SAP won't support it and does not guarantee that the interface or logic stays the same. In my experience lots of functions I do want to use are not released (or documented), but I will still use them because they seem to be the best alternative in certain scenarios.
Cheers, harald

Do we have standard function module or program to activate transformation?

Hi Gurus,
Do we have any standard function module or program to activate transformation in BI system? If yes please let me know or let me know how to proceed with to create custom program to activate transformation.
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi Sven,
Thanks for your help.
Even I am facing the same problem, we didnt want to open the production system to activate the transformation also it take time to transport them every time from development
can you please explain how to use these methods, what parameters to pass
do you have a sample code, it will be of great help.
use this methods
cl_rstran_trfn=>factory
cl_rsds_rsds=>if_rso_tlogo_general~get_instance
l_rsds->if_rso_tlogo_maintain~is_active
l_rsds->if_rso_tlogo_maintain~activate

Copy Standard Functional Module

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for