Corporate Account/Group Key field in SD Reports?

Hi,
We would like to start populating the Corporate Account field on the General Data > Internal Control tab of the customer master. This field is available in FI reporting (FBL5N - as Group Key) but does anyone know if it is available in SD reports? We can't find it...
Thanks in advance!
SDUser_2011

Hi SD User
Check : KNA1-KONZS(Group Key)
Regards,
Krishna.

Similar Messages

Selecting Semantic Group Key Fields for Cube to Cube DTP

Is it possible to use the semantic group key fields selection when performing a DTP between two infoCubes? When I try to select the key field of 0CALWEEK, i am unable to as the selection screen is grayed out like I'm in display mode even though I'm in change mode for the DTP.
Thanks,
Matthew

Hi,
Have you initialized the planning area for the 11th key figure to be loaded. Make sure that the key figure which you want to load is initialized for the planning version for the respective planning area.
Also check the loading period inside the variant is within the planning area initialized period for that key figure. And make sure that you have made the key figure assignment for the info cube and planning area inside the variant.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Group Key field Match Code in Vendor Master

My client have a unique requirement to group the vendors. We are using the Group key field in the vendor master for this purpose, We want to create a match code which can link the vendor number to the group key field. Anyone have any idea on how this can be developed or configured.
When I looked at the help on this field Following is the help mentioned. but I am not sure how the match code for the group key would work or how to configure this. I appreciate any inputs on this issue.
Group key
     If the customer or the vendor belongs to a group, you can enter a group
     key here. The group key is freely assignable.
     If you create a matchcode using this group key, group evaluations are
     possible.

I know it has to be done by ABAP group but I got confused with the help on this field.. ABAP group says it is going to be a core code change since there is no user exit available for that field.

Problem in Grouping the Fields of a Report

I want to make a report in which a particular field (say A) of a table (T1) is the field on which report is to be grouped above if a field B in T1 has value 'a' then I wish to print certain other fields with the field A when value of field B has value is 'b'.
Thx in Advance

use avg(Duration% by <"Date Table"."Date Level"> in the answers column.
substitute "Date Table" with your actual time dimension table name, and "Date Level" with your actual date column that you want to group by.

Vendor account group sensitive field mail trigger

Dear All,
We have configured the sensitive field in vendor master so that whenever someone change the sensitive field mail get trigger to that users.
Here problem is for employee vendors also that mail gets triggerd.
So we want excluse those vendor account groups from this sensitive field.
Is this possible?

thanks for your quick reply.
i have wrongly said in above mail. pls ignore mail triggering..
Whenever we are changing the sensitive field it will go and sit inthe FK08 transaction.
then some one has to confirm or reject then only it will get update that field.
Edited by: madansiva on Sep 29, 2010 10:22 AM

Different field groups in the different account groups

Dear IT Experts,
I´m working on restructuring authorization in roles concerning the IC and TP customers.
The goal of this changes is be able to have different field groups in the different account groups (TP and IC), for give you some more detail a good example can be, the same AMS user should be able to change general data and sales views for TP customers but for IC he should only be allowed to change the sales views, however when the changes are made in the roles they are being ignored because as far as I could check the system does not have as a rule that the field groups are or can be dependent from the account group...
I can give you a clear example:
Role A
F_KNA1_AEN -> VGRUP = 10-16
F_KNA1_GRP -> ACTVT = 01, 02, 03
F_KNA1_GRP -> KTOKD = INTR
Role B
F_KNA1_AEN -> VGRUP = 16
F_KNA1_GRP -> ACTVT = 01, 02, 03
F_KNA1_GRP -> KTOKD = THIR
Despite it looks fine, the system is not validating the account group with the correspondent field group in each role, so the field groups that the system use is unique, it means it the content of the object F_KNA1_AEN in total independently of used account group!
So my question is, can we apply any other object that makes the field group being directly depending of the account group, as we can see for example activities for each account group having something similar for field group and account group?
Can someone please explain me step-by-step how I can do this work even if by another method?
I´m quite new on this issues and I really need your wisdom to find a solution for this.
Many thanks
Katjia

Hi Manoj
The debate is each inidividual business unit has defined different account groups for the same vendor in their respective systems.
The question is : What is the best practice-- Should we keep Vendor account group as main table field and define Vendors with one unique account groups OR we maintain the account group in qualified table each pointing to different business unit.
In my opinion this is going to be very complex solution. Ideally we need to define all the Harmonization rules before syndicating data to different target systems.
Is this possibel that the same vendor record which is existing as vendor of different account groups in different systems have same set of attributes. If yes then enabling the remote key for Account group Lookup field is one option and defining a unique Account group 'AG" (which is mapped to say AG1 from remote system1, AG2 from remote system2 and so on..)..
Managing this via Qualified table will be very complex and not advisabel. As Rajesh also mentioned Account Group in MDM should be considered as Global attribute and all such harmonization rules should be defined in your project. AG1=AG2=AG in above exmaple.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks-Ravi

Key Field not to be seen in report

Hi,
I have a DSO and in that I have 1 key field and 20 data fields.
I was able to load the data successfully in the DSO. And I am creating a report based on this DSO.
But when I create a report, I was unable to view the key field in the report.
I went to the query designer and checked, I could not see that particular key field also in my query designer, I could only see the data fields.
Could someone please guide me in this regard???
Would definitely assign points for the solution...
Thanks & Regards.

Hi,
I have checked the info object and it is BEx enabled.
I am not able to see another 2 characteristics as well in query designer while creating the query.
I can view two sections, i.e. Key Figures and Dimensions.
And I am creating a report on DSO not in a cube.

Key field not available in report

Hi,
I have a DSO and in that I have 1 key field and 20 data fields.
I was able to load the data successfully in the DSO. And I am creating a report based on this DSO.
But when I create a report, I was unable to view the key field in the report.
I went to the query designer and checked, I could not see that particular key field also in my query designer, I could only see the data fields.
Could someone please guide me in this regard???
Would definitely assign points for the solution...
Thanks & Regards.

Hi,
Please uncheck the Attribute only check box in the General tab of that Keyfield info Object.
If any info Object checked as Attribute only then those objects wont display in the Query Designer.
dont forget to give me the points..
thanks,
CK

Grouping vendor payments using Grouping key issue

Hello Gurus,
I created a new grouping key in config to be assigned to the vendor master (under Payments Transactions Accounting). The grouping key fields used were BUDAT (Posting Date) and ZFBDT (Baseline Payment Date). The automatic payment program should group payments to vendors based on this grouping key.
This solution works fine when the vendors have a negative amount in the automatic payment program run. However, if the vendor has a positive balance (due to payroll related adjustments), the payment program will not process the line item. Since we are grouping open vendor items by posting date and baseline payment date, the system treats this as a unique grouping key and is not clearing against any subsequent payment runs (because of different posting date and baseline date).
Is there a way to clear the positive balance without manual intervention? The solution works fine otherwise.
Thanks for your help.
- Tarun

Hello,
Functionally, a credit amount means it is treated as an Invoice. Meaning that your company is required to make the payment to the vendor. In other words, your company liable to make the payment for the minus amounts.
Whereas, the debit entries are nothing but debit notes, in sap you call as credit memo. These are NOT to be paid to the vendor. You need to adjust them from the invoice amounts (minus figures) before making the payment.
I would suggest you run F-44 or F.13 to clear them (net of minus and plus values). Then you will have only minus figures. Later you run F110.
If you want to clear them automatically in F.13, you should have configuration (criteria) in OB74.
Please let me know if you need any further details.
Regards,
Ravi

Group key on Customer master not maintainable.

Hi All,
Group key field under customer master General data is not editable for some customers only. What restricts us, not maintaining this field.
Thanks
Raghuram

Hi,
Customer 14788 is having Recon Account (5200500) , Group key is editable.
Customer 702270 is having Recon Account (5200500) , Group key is not editable.
So i understood that this field is not controlled by field status. Correct me if i am wrong.
Thanks
Raghuram

How to merge key field from external source system with SAP R/3 master

Hi,
In SAP BW 7.0 system, our scenario is Master Data for 0GL_ACCOUNT is coming from SAP R/3 alongwith the Transactional data records for standard FI cubes. Then, one more set of transaction data is coming from external source system, a flat file, into another custom DSO(ZDSO_FI), which also has this GL Account field.
This flat file's GL account, GL_file, has to be basically mapped/merged with the standard 0GL_ACCOUNT field so that at the time of loading the transactional data for custom DSO, ZDSO_FI (with transformation mapping GL_file > 0GL_ACCOUNT), system automatically refers to the 0GL_ACCOUNT master data to load these incoming transactional values, from the external flat file system. How can this be done?
To illustrate the scenario, say I have 5 records in 0GL_ACCOUNT, loaded from SAP R/3 into SAP BW-
0GL_ACCOUNT      Short Description     Source System
100                                   D1                          R/3
200                                   D2                          R/3
300                                   D3                          R/3
400                                   D4                          R/3
500                                   D5                          R/3
Now suppose if my flat file has following sample transactional data, to be uploaded in SAP BW ZDSO_FI-
GL_file      Key Figure1
400          789
200          567
Then after uploading this transactional data in ZDSO_FI (with transformation mapping GL_file > 0GL_ACCOUNT), the 0GL_ACCOUNT data becomes as below-
0GL_ACCOUNT      Short Description     Source System
400
200
100                                   D1                          R/3
200                                   D2                          R/3
300                                   D3                          R/3
400                                   D4                          R/3
500                                   D5                          R/3
So note that the system did not refer the incoming GL's from flat file, although the field is mapped to 0GL_ACCOUNT in transformation, to the already available master data. Rather created 2 new data rows for the GL accounts coming from external system. Because of this I am not able to perform the calculations common from standard FI cube and ZDSO_FI, with GL account as key field. I need to synchronise these data values based on GL Account to proceed with further calculation and am badly stuck.
Request if anyone can please throw some light on how to achieve this seemingly simple requirement?
Thanks in advance.
Nirmit

Better post this thread is in the [Enterprise Data Warehousing|Data Warehousing; forum.

Change vendor account group

Hi All,
Is there anything I need to check before changing vendor account group (with different number ranges) in XK07. User has selected account group wrongly and also posting done for those vendors.
I think there would be no effect in open items.
Thanks,
Vishal

Dear Mr. Visal,
please be so kind to review the documentation regarding the transaction XK07:-
"Changes to the account group and the accompanying partner functions
can only be made from a lower level to a higher level. For example,
this means that a sold-to party cannot be assigned the function of a
payer as fields which have already been maintained for this sold-to
party would have to be masked. However, you can assign the sold-to
party function to a payer."
Therefore, you can change from an account group with fields set as
not visible to optional fields. However, if you are trying to change
an account group with optional fields to other account group with any
of this fields invisible, the system will give you the error message
"You cannot make this change because the new account group
   results in the following field groups being switched off:"
And you will not be able to change the account group. This will happen
although you have not updated a value for these optional fields.
Really it depends on which is the field you want to change; there are
some fields that could produce some data inconsistency (reconciliation
account, withholding tax data, and so on).
Please consider that the account group controls the successing
screens and field layout plus it controls whether the numbering
should be internal or external.
Please take in consideration all the above information before doing it.
I hope this can help You.
Mauri

Currency vs Account group restriction for vendor master

Dear All,
Is it possible to restrict the user from using inr for Import vendors account group and other currencies for domestic vendor account group in standard????

Hi,
Through authorization object F_LFA1_GRP (Vendor: Account Group Authorization ) field - KTOKK (Vendor account group) you can restrict user to create particular type vendor i.e Import Vendor or Domestic Vendor etc. Pls refer below screenshot...
As k your Basis user to restrict as per account group ....Through PFCG transaction..
Regards
Abhishek Tiwari

BAPI for transaction FB01 with account posting key

Hi,
I have to use a BAPI for registering Invoices into the FI module through the FB01 transaction.
I am trying to use the standard BAPI: BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST
The problem is that this BAPI does not manage the account posting key (field BSCHL).
Could anyone provide help?
Thank you very much in advance.

It is happening here in the BAPI
CALL FUNCTION 'FI_GET_POSTING_KEY'
         EXPORTING
              i_ktosl       = gs_accit-ktosl
         IMPORTING
              e_bschs       = ld_bschs
              e_bschh       = ld_bschh
              e_umskz       = ld_umskz
         EXCEPTIONS
              error_message = 1.
As max pointed out, it is dependent on the transaction key(KTOSL).
Srinivas

Account group mapping is not uderstand ?

Hi Experts,
I am not understanding the mapping between the account groups.
If you check under "Customer Account Group" the field name "Group", I dont understand where it is mapping to other account group?
And how all the account groups linked with eachother? (G/L, Customer, Vendor)
Please check..
Thanks

Hi,
i had the same error 'account group DEBI not defined - CRM_BUPA_FRG0040' when trying to download my R/3 IS-U business partner from R/3 -> CRM. I checked PIDE settings, groupings and number ranges (internal/ext) settings dozens of times and had no explanation.
I made the same experience that suddenly my BP were downloaded when i DELETED the entry in PIDE (but they were created in CRM not in the customized number range)
The final reason was that i did not properly download all the csutomizing mentioned in the
SAP best practice building block configuration guide B09
There the object DNL_CUST_KTOKD was mentioned - it contains the R/3 account groups which have to be transferred to CRM in spite of the fact that CRM business partners don`t have an account group
For the sales data the replication object CUSTOMER_MAIN has to be used - this contains the R/3 IS-U SD customer. The replication object BUPA_MAIN contains the R/3 IS-U Business partner. This is also the reason why downloading BUPA_MAIN might work even without the proper account group settings in PIDE, the PIDE settings are important for the R/3 SD customers
Edited by: sapgipsy on Apr 9, 2010 3:56 PM

Corporate Account/Group Key field in SD Reports?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for