Correction to ordinary dep. greater than acc. dep. in Area 20 (Cost Actng.)

Hi Experts,
While in month-end closing our user try to do AIAB but he got the error 'Correction to ordinary dep. greater than acc. dep. in Area 20 (Cost Accounting Dep. Area). Could you please tell me why it is coming and I think this is related after we tr. balance carry forward for the previous Fiscal Year (31.3.2010).
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Sri.

Hi Sri,
Regarding error AA634, please set the flag "all values allowed" in transaction OABN. The message AA634 should be solved then.
Kind Regards,
Brigitte

Similar Messages

Transaction type used for FA posting to depreciation area 01 (ordinary dep)

Hi Expert,
There is a difference between my ordinary dep area 01 and book dep area 03.
area 01 is having a USD100
area 03 is having zero USD
I need to zerolized area 01.
I have created a new TTY and limit the dep area posting to 01 in OAYA. However, when I tried to post via ABZE, it is giving me an error message AA350.
Diagnosis
According to Table T093A, if you use transaction type 050, area 03 has to adopt values from area 01 (chart of depreciation TPGL). However, the specifications made in Table TABWA for the two areas do not agree.
Procedure
Maintain the transaction type using the Customizing menu. Both areas have to have either the indicator 'propose for posting' or 'has to be posted'.
I have checked both tables and it is not allowing me to post to area 01 only. I have done this before by creating a new TTY and post to area 02 and it works.
Please advise soon how to rectify this.
Thanks.
Angel.

Hi,
please check ion OABC if area 02 takes over the values identically.
regards Bernhard

In ITunes, my library was about 55 G. I have a Ipod Classic 160 G. I synchronised my IPod on ITunes and I checked the tag Convert songs with a throughput greater than 128 kbit / s ACC before synchronisation I took maybe 6 hours to synchronise, and af

In ITunes,
my library was about 55 G. I have a Ipod Classic 160 G. I synchronised my IPod
on ITunes and I checked the tag Convert
songs with a throughput greater than 128 kbit / s ACC before
synchronisation I took maybe 6 hours to synchronise, and afterward my library was
about 42 G. All my tunes, more than 9500, seem still be in library. Most of my
library is from music purchased in ITunes store along with copies on my old CDs
an some MP3 files from other discs. This is good for me but what happened?

This is good for me but what happened?
I don't understand the question... Did something happen that you think should not have happened?
It took such a long time to sync, because iTunes was converting songs with bit-rate higher than 128 kbps "on the fly" while syncing. That takes much longer than just syncing the songs.
Also, since you have so much space on your iPod (compared to the size of your music library), you should not use that "convert to 128 kbps AAC" setting. For songs that are encoded higher than 128 kbps, the conversion reduces sound quality. You may want to uncheck Sync Music and Apply, to remove the songs on the iPod currently, and then sync it all again without the "convert" setting checked this time.

I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, and . The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the C

I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, < and >. The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the Contents or the Index of the generated HTML. In the Contents the words are completely missing and in the index entries the '\' characters that are required in the markers remain in the entry but the leading less than symbol and the first character of the word is deleted; hence what should appear as <dataseries> appears as \ataseries\>. I believe this is a FMv12 bug. Has anyone else experienced this? Is the FM team aware and working on a fix. Any suggestions for a workaround?

The Index issue is more complicated since in order to get the < and > into the index requires the entry itself to be escaped. So, in order to index '<x2settings>' you have to key '\<x2settings\>'. Looking at the generated index entry in the .js file we see '<key name=\"\\2settings\\>\">. This is a bit of a mess and produces an index entry of '\2settings\>'. This ought to be '<key name=\"&lt;x2settings&gt;\" >'. I have tested this fix and it works - but the worst of it is that the first character of the index entry has been stripped out. Consequently I cannot fix this with a few global changes - and I have a lot of index entries of this type. I'm looking forward to a response to this since I cannot publish this document in its current state.

Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

Oracle 10g
Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECT"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
     "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
     "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
     "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
     "RRDATE" DATE,
     "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
     "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
     "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
   )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
ap.projID "projID",
ap.projName "projName",
ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
END "phaseMonths"
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
AND PhaseMonths IN
(SELECT
(CASE
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
ELSE null
END) AS PhaseMonths
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
ORDER BY ap.projID

Looking for this?
select *
   from (
        SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
          , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
          , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
          , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
          , ap.projID "projID"
          , ap.projName "projName"
          , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
          , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
          , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 ELSE null
            END "phaseMonths"
          FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
         WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
           AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
         ORDER
            BY ap.projID
where "phaseMonths" >= 3

How to use (greater than) in web services call

Hello, I am trying to query a set of assets where the external unique ID is greater than 400,000. My existing code looks like
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'"
However, using this will return any asset record starting with a 5 or above as far as I can tell, I assume b/c it is comparing string data due to the single quotes infering data of type text (string). Is it possible to use comparison operators with numeric data correctly?
I posed this question to support and received the below answer:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <soap:Body> <AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input xmlns="urn:crmondemand/ws/asset/"> <ListOfAsset xmlns="urn:/crmondemand/xml/asset"> <Asset> <AssetId /> <PurchaseDate/> <OwnerAccountId /> <ExternalSystemId>> '400000'</ExternalSystemId> </Asset> </ListOfAsset> </AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
Basically, instructing me to use &gt. I'm doing coding in .NET visual studio and not using the XML as above. However, I did try the following:
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'" which returned an error in the compiler.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Thanks for the reply. I would assume "external system id" is an integer, but, I will test on a custom field that I now is of type integer.
Could you take your same code and use a non-zero value for the operand? For example, could you try
objAccQryParam.ListOfAccount[0].CustomInteger0 = ">= '10'"; and let me know if that returns values that are greater than or equal to 10. Using a two digit number is important. Assuming you have data greater than 10.
Thanks!

ESS Claims - Requested value Rs. 20000 is greater than balance eligibility

Dear All,
While Approving the ESS claims request getting a error message Requested value Rs. 20000 is greater than balance eligibility value 0.00.
Help in solving this issue.
Regards,
Potru.

Hi,
This is a correct error. Please check the balance amount in infty 45 for the particular loan type. The loan request should not exceed that.
Hope this helps
Regards
Roy

Greater than 4000 characters in OBIEE 11g

Dear all,
I have a table, just one column.
In Analysis, I designed a table with this column content the data as text greater than 4000 characters.
Can I show all of them in OBIEE ?
Can I change the column datatype?
Anyone help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
David,...

I guess you will have problem displying them in OBIEE since (The data type would be long);
You can not use long datatype column in below cases;
1. A value of datatype LONG was used in a function or in a DISTINCT, WHERE, CONNECT BY, GROUP BY, or ORDER BY clause. A LONG value can only be used in a SELECT clause
2. It can not be used in expressions or conditions
3. It can not be used in select lists of subqueries or queries combined by set operators
Make sure your generated query is not doing the above things. First thing Distinct will come in the obiee queries by default. Try to avoid distinct,group by,order by in your reports. Direct database request for the report can help you in this case.
Mark Correct if it helps.
Regards,
Kashi

Increasing maximum number of Logical Processors in a Processor Group greater than the default (64)

Can the maximum number of Logical Processors allowed in a Processor Group be increased by Bcdedit command or registry key to a number greater than the default (64) to allow non-group-aware applications to seamlessly scale via multithreading across more cores
MSDN documents methods to reduce the max number of LP's in a Processor Group to 1 or any power of 2 less than 64 in order to increase the number of Processor Groups. But there is no discussion of how to increase the maximum number of Logical Processors
allowed in a Processor Group to a number greater than the default (64), e.g. to 128 or 256.
Since a non-group-aware application/process can only run on 1 Processor Group, increasing this limit is needed to allow non-group-aware multithreaded applications to scale seamlessly for parallel computation across more than 64 cores simultaneously on systems
with more than 64 cores (for example, a quad-socket Intel Xeon system with 24 cores per socket, including true and hyper cores). If that limit can be set via registry key or command line, or if there is another way to force all the cores on
all 4 sockets (4 NUMA nodes in this case) to join in 1 Processor Group, then non-group-aware applications will not need to be rewritten using group-aware thread-affinity APIs.

Hi John,
Are you trying to specify a static NUMA-node-to-group assignment, rather than letting Windows dynamically assign NUMA nodes to groups at boot time? If yes, You can refer the
following related KB:
How to manually configure K-Group assignment on multiprocessor machines
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2506384
Systems with fewer than 64 logical processors always have a single group, Group 0. On systems with 64 or fewer processors, existing applications will operate correctly without
modification. Applications that do not call any functions that use processor affinity masks or processor numbers will operate correctly on all systems, regardless of the number of processors. To operate correctly on systems with more than 64 logical processors,
the following kinds of applications might require modification:
•Applications that manage, maintain, or display per-processor information for the entire system must be modified to support more than 64 logical processors. An example of
such an application is Windows Task Manager, which displays the workload of each processor in the system.
•Applications for which performance is critical and that can scale efficiently beyond 64 logical processors must be modified to run on such systems. For example, database
applications might benefit from modifications.
•If an application uses a DLL that has per-processor data structures, and the DLL has not been modified to support more than 64 logical processors, all threads in the application
that call functions exported by the DLL must be assigned to the same group.
By design, a non-NUMA computer is considered to have one NUMA node. Because NUMA nodes cannot span groups, the system creates a node for each group after you restart the computer.
The related KB:
Processor Groups
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd405503(v=vs.85).aspx
More information:
Uneven Windows Processor Groups
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/saponsqlserver/archive/2011/10/08/uneven-windows-processor-groups.aspx
Boot Parameters to Test Drivers for Multiple Processor Group Support
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff542298(v=vs.85).aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

In Exchange 2013 i cannot open mails with attachments greater than 19.6 MB in EWS or OWA

Hello,
i have in Exchange 2013 CU3 on Windows 2012 the following problem :
When backup mails using EWS i get the message " EWS Error Code : ErrorMessageSizeExceeded." in mails with attachments greater than 20.137 KB ( 19.6 MB).
Then I checked all the settings of the EWS , but the defaults are already significantly higher than these 19.6 MB (Base64 approximately 26.5 MB)
web.config ( maxAllowedContentLength = " 85000000 ").
Settings of the MaxSendSize and ReceiveSize are 300MB .
All requestfiltering settings in IIS are set to 85MB.
When i access via EMS or OWA , file attachments over 19.6 MB can not be opened .
However, the preview shows in OWA the correct mail including attachment and it can be saved from the preview up to the set maximum size.
By double clicking on an email in OWA bigger than 19.6 MB i get the following error message:
"Error : Your request can not be completed right now Please try again later . . "
Send and receive mail can also be up to maxsize .
When accessing via Outlook , this problem does not occur.
i hope anyone here can help me
Thanks in advance

Hi,
To change the maximum message size for Outlook Web App clients, you need to change the value of
maxAllowedContentLength, maxRequestLength and both instances of
maxReceivedMessageSize by editing %ExchangeInstallPath%ClientAccess\Owa\web.config in notepad.
To change the maximum message size for Exchange Web Services clients, you need to change the value of
maxAllowedContentLength and all instances of maxReceivedMessageSize="67108864" in %ExchangeInstallPath%ClientAccess\exchweb\ews\web.config.
When you are finished, save and close the Web.config file. Also need to restart IIS by running the following command:
IISReset /noforce
For more information about Configure Client-Specific Message Size Limits on Client Access Servers, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh529949(v=exchg.150).aspx
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Transferring data to a flat file with a length greater than 255 bytes??

Is there a way to do this? At the end of the month, my dataset will reach a length of anywhere between 271 and 335. Even though I have the transfer field setup with a length of 512, I am only getting 255 characters worth of data when I pull the flat file in from the server.
Has anyone discovered a way to handle this? I cannot break the record up into blocks of 255, the Transfer has to be able to handle something greater than a length of 255.
Many Thanks!
Tavares L. Phillips

OK - according to OSS note 626010:
Short text          "TRANSFER f TO dataset" ignores LENGTH addition
Responsible         SAP AG
Component           BC-ABA-LA
                    Syntax, Compiler, Runtime
Long text
Symptom
In rare cases, the "TRANSFER f TO dataset" statement ignores the LENGTH
addition.
Other terms
DATASET, FILE
Reason and Prerequisites
This is caused by a kernel error.
Solution
The error is corrected for SAP_BASIS 6.20 using kernel patch 848.
Valid releases
Software Component                        Release
                                          from            to
SAP_BASIS SAP Basis component
610          - 620
It's an old note but...?
Rob

Error in opening Fiscal Year by Dep. Area

Hi All,
We have following Depreciation Areas:
01 - Book Depreciation and 10,11,12 & 13 for Tax Depreciation.
I am trying to open Fiscal Year 2014 for Tax Depreciation Area only by using T-code OAAR, system is giving me below error message:
You also have to change the close of depreciation area 01
Message no. AC433
Diagnosis
Depreciation area 10, for which you want to reset the year-end closing, is linked to depreciation area 01.
This could be because the areas are linked due to:
Identical acquisition and production costs (value takeover)
A derived depreciation area
Procedure
Correct your entries. You can only modify the area for which you received the message.
I checked setting of t-code OABC:Dep. Area 10 is having ValAd as 01, this is the reason system is not allowing to Open Fiscal Year 2014.
Please throw some insight how I can open fiscal Year 2014 for Tax Areas only.
Thanks & Regards,
Vivek

Hi George,
Thanks for helping me out. There was no identical check on OABC for area 10.
Upon researching more I found that there are other depreciation area which is only for reporting, are deriving values from Dep Area 10 and 01.
Therefore system was throwing error to open Fiscal Year for 01 as well. I have removed the derivation from dep area used for reporting only and try to open Fiscal Year for Tax Area, now system allow me to open it by Area.
This issue is resolved. Thanks again for your help.
Regards,
Vivek

Post park ivoice M8079 'Reversal value greater than value invoiced to date'

I create a Service purchase order number is 8200000747 in our products system, and service entry sheet number is 1000026152, material document number is 5000306476.
When I create a park invoice reference this Service PO, the system can not clear GR/IR account with that service entry sheet(1000026152). When we want to post this park invoice, system generate message M8079 'Reversal value greater than value invoiced to date'. But, this item never been verification invoice , I can find this not cleared GR/IR data in MR11, this item not a multi account assignment , no foreign currency.
What happened? How can I carry out the correct GR/IR account data in park invoice?

Hello,
Instead of reversing the invoice try posting the Credit Memo through MIRO .
Regards
Mahesh

Amount to credit greater than credit balance - goods return to AP Cred Note

Hi All,
I've got the following scenario:
We have a AP Goods Return on the system which totals £12.94 with freight charges of -£3.75. We have copied this to a AP Credit Note, but have amended the freight from -£3.75 to -£3.00(UK VAT Rate 15% applicable throughout). The total credit field now shows £13.80 and the credit balance field shows £12.94. When you try to add the document it gives an error "amount to credit greater than credit balance". I'm using 2005A PL53.
Can anyone please advise the reason behind the error and also what the correct way of handling this kind of transaction would be?
Kind regards,
Matt

Hi Wesley,
I tried both methods and it doesn't resolve the issue. Spoke to SAP, they gave me a solution and workaround, the issue is a bit more complicated as what it may seem. You manually have to close the goods return, create a standalone service credit note with the appropriate GL account to reverse out the "goods clearing account" entry created by the reversal journal. The bahaviour has been changed in SBO 2007 and therefore the problem is not present in this version anymore. Thanks for your help anyway.
Kind regards,
Matt
Edited by: Greeff Matt on Jun 5, 2009 9:47 AM

PUT Blobs of size greater than 5.5MB fail with HTTPS but not HTTP

I have written a Cygwin app that uploads (using the REST API PUT operation) Block Blobs to my Azure storage account, and it works well for different size blobs when using HTTP. However, use of SSL (i.e. PUT using HTTPS) fails for Blobs greater than 5.5MB.
Blobs less than 5.5MB upload correctly. Anything greater and I find that the TCP session (as seen by Wireshark) reports a dwindling window size that goes to 0 once the aforementioned number of bytes have been transferred. The failure is very repeatable and
consistent. As a point of reference, PUT operations against my Google/AWS/HP accounts work fine when using HTTPS for various object sizes, which suggests my problem is not in my client but specific to the HTTPS implementation on the MSAZURE storage servers.
If I upload the 5.5MB blob as two separate uploads of 4MB and 1.5MB followed by a PUT Block List, the operation succeeds as long as the two uploads used
separate HTTPS sessions. Notice the emphasis on separate. That same operation fails if I attempt to maintain an HTTPS session across both uploads. This is another data point that seems to suggest that the Storage
server has a problem
Any ideas on why I might be seeing this odd behavior that appears very specific to MS Azure HTTPS, but is not seen when used against AWS/Google/HP cloud storage servers?

Hi,
I'm getting this problem also when trying to upload blobs > 5.5mb using the Azure PHP SDK with HTTPS.
There is no way I can find to get a blob > 5.5mb to upload, unless you use http, rather than https, which is not a good solution.
I've written my own scripts to use the HTTP_Request2 library, to send the request as a test, and it fails with that also when using the 'socket' method.
However, if I write a script using the PHP Curl extension directly, then it works fine, and blobs > 5.5mb get uploaded.
It seems to be irrelevant which method is used, uploading in 1 go, or using smaller chunks, the PHP SDK seems broken.
Also, I think I've found another bug in the SDK, when you do the smaller chunks, the assigning of the BlockID is not correct.
In: WindowsAzure/Blob/BlobRestProxy.php
Line: $block->setBlockId(base64_encode(str_pad($counter++, '0', 6)));
That is incorrect usage of the str_pad function, and if you upload a huge blob that needs splitting, then the blockIDs will after a while become a different length and therefore fail.
It should be: str_pad($counter++, 6, '0',STR_PAD_LEFT);
I also think there is 1 too many base64_encodes() in there, as I think its being done twice, once in that line, and then again within the createBlobBlock() just before the send() for a 2nd time.
Can someone please advice, when this/these bug(s) will be fixed in the PHP SDK, as at the moment its useless to me as I cant upload things securely.

Correction to ordinary dep. greater than acc. dep. in Area 20 (Cost Actng.)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for