Cost Before settlement in WBS element

Hi Experts ,
In my scenario following costs are coming to WBS element,
1. Cost from Network ... i.e. Networks are getting settled to WBS element
2. Internal Order .....i.e. Internal orders are getting settled to WBS element
3. Plant Manitance order...i.e. PM orders are getting settled to WBS element
4. Cost from other WBS element..... i.e. cost from one WBS element get settled to other WBS element
All the cost from WBS element get settled to AUC then from AUC to final asset.
Before settlement of WBS element I can see the cost in WBSE in trasnaction CJI3.
After settlement if I see the cost of same WBSE in CJI3 , it shows 0 cost ,as all the cost has been settled to Asset.
I wanted to know what was cost before my settlement in CJI3 transaction.
Could you please let me know in CJ3 transaction on which fields I need to put the filter in above scenario ??
Regards,
Pradip Shelke

Hi,
YOu can also filter on the basis of document type.
Please check the relevant document types like WE ( Goods reciept ) etc. Not only KOAO but other business transactions like KOAE also are settlement docs exclude them.
BR

Similar Messages

Settling the WBS element costs to an AuC

Please Explain the procedure for settling the WBS element costs to an AuC & then to asset?

Hi,
Please follow the below sequence of steps for this:
1) For WBS element where the asset has to be created, AUC willbe created automatically when the WBS element is in release status to get this investment profile should be assigned to WBS element in Control Tab
2) You can see in the system status show as AUC to see the AUC number follow the path
EDIT-> WBS element -> Investment program--> Asset under Construction where you can see the AUC which is created automatically
3) Once the above two steps are through, for settlement to AuC goto transaction CJ88 give the WBS element number select the processing type as partial captalization and execute all the costs pertaining to that. WBS elements will be automatically settled to the AUC which is created for that WBS element
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

Settling the costs of a parent WBS elements

Dear experts,
i have a cost project consist of 3 levels work break down structure:
level 1: a root WBS element
level 2: splited into 2 WBS elements (Production - Maintenance)
level 3: spliting each WBS element of the above level into 3 WBS elements (Service - Materials - Labour)
actual postings ONLY is against level 3 WBS elements and the costs is acomulated to level 2 and then to level 1
but my customer wants to settle ONLY level 2 WBS elements (Production - Maintenance).
so...
i maintained settlement rules only for level 2 WBS elements (Production - Maintenance)
level 3 WBS elements (Service - Materials - Labour) are assigned settlement profile
90, which has the setting "Not for settlement".
when i tried to run settlement for level 2 WBS elements (Production - Maintenance) i failed coz i got 3 "Nor relevant" and 1 "No change"
so, my question is: is it possible to settle aparent WBS element in which there's no actual costs has incurred "has no actual costs of its own", however, it only has childs WBS elements that have actual costs

If you read your post carefully you will understand what mistake you are doing. Read SAP Help and search forum regarding settlement you will find the answer for this
so, my question is: is it possible to settle aparent WBS element in which there's no actual costs has incurred "has no actual costs of its own", however, it only has childs WBS elements that have actual costs
Edited by: Mohamed Rafi on Jul 4, 2011 7:06 PM

Settlement of wbs element

Good morning all ps guies
I need help from u
I m doing customer project. My top WBS element is account assignment and billing element.
This wbs is assigned to scales order .I m getting cost and revenues on this wbs element.
Now i want to settle this wbs element. One way is to settle to co-pa, as this wbs is carring both cost and revenues.
But co team decided not to implement co-pa.
so where can i settle this wbs element? and how?
can i settle to cost center? scales order?
Please give ur suggessions
regards
shashankl

Hi Gurus,
I am loading the REAl ESTATE data through LSMW-BAPI.
I need to load the settlement reciever as WBS elements.
While loading the data i am getting the error
WBS element does not exist even though it is existing in the client and master table as well.
KIndly let me know what can be done regarding this??

Mutually cancelling entry in CJI3 after order settlement to WBS element

Hi,
In our scenario we create Service Orders for work execution & assign WBS element to the service order (to control the spends). When actual costs get booked in the service order, I can see these costs in the Project Actual Cost Line items report (CJI3). When I settle the order costs to the WBS element, there is a mutually cancelling entry in the CJI3 report for that WBS element for the settled amount. Is this the right behaviour?
Can someone pl enlighten how the cost flows from order to WBS element before settlement & after settlement?
Thanking you in advance
Rgds
Deepak

That's normal with line item report incase you use settlement 'By cost element' (Allocation structure)
If you use by settlement 'Settlement cost element' you see another line item but again the net balance would be zero.
But in case of hierarchy reports in PS settlement transactions are ignored.
To see actual costs on WBS in the line item report, try to use filters and filter out settlement transaction (field offset type, or settlement cost element)
Regards
Sreenivas

Product order settlement to WBS element

Hi experts,
i have a quastion, how can i settlement product order to WBS element?It exist some customizing for the automatic generation of settlement rules for this?
Thanks a lot
Gustavo

Look in SPRO:
Project System>Costs>Automatic and Periodic Allocations>Settlement
Check the:
Settlement Profiles
Settlement Rules
etc
Above all check the Help documentation from SAP before configuring.

Work Order Cost Rolling Up to WBS Element!

Hi everyone,
I created a Project A with WBS structure in PS (not statistical WBS structure). And then I assigned a work order to one of the WBS element A.0001. I did not post any cost to the WBS element directly. I only charged $1000 to the work order. Now when I use CN41N to generate the cost report and I found the $1000 in work order rolled up to WBS element A.0001 ($1000 showed at work order level and also WBS element level). Then I settled $1000 in the work order to a WBS element C.0001 in Project C. When I run CN41N again to see the cost in Project A, the $1000 still showed up at work order level, but it did not show up at WBS element level A.0001. I need the cost to roll up at WBS element level also, so this is a big problem for me.
I did several test. Assigned another work order to this WBS element A.0001 and charged another $1000 to the work order. Then I settled them to cost center directly instead of to WBS element. The $1000 showed up at the work order level and also at WBS element level (the cost rolled up from work order to the WBS element in that report). Then I tried to settle to GL account, the cost will roll up to WBS element too.
So I found only when I settle the cost to WBS element, the cost won't roll up. I think it might be a configuration problem. Does anyone know where I need to configure in order to let the cost roll up to the WBS element after I settle the Work order to a WBS elements?
Really appreciate your help!
Ting

Hi Martina,
This is awesome, very helpful! Now I know how to deal with it.
Thanks a lot!
Ting

Error - Settlement for WBS Element

Dear All
My query is the prj is EP & WBS El is EP-99, under EP-99 the avialable values are Rs192,523/- as per different cost element wise & the values has been posted/transferred the reposting transaction from another wbs element. Those values have to settled on an one AUC-asset & the value will be settled periodicaly. My posted values are in 10th/2008 & I want to settled the said values in 10th prd. But after processing of CJ88 the error has been raised "There no accured amounts settlement is not possible" Also note that Other WBSE has been settled under said prj.
Please help me.
Regards
Avijit Barman
Edited by: Avijit Barman on Feb 25, 2008 12:06 PM

Dear Sreenivas
My issue is solve but not from note. I convert status from REL to TECO of WBS element & set the full settlement & prd 11 instead of 10th. Then run & its ok.
Regards
Avijit

Settlement fo Wbs element to Copa

Hi All,
Iam new to project systems concept. In month end when we settle wbs element to copa.data will flow into F!, profit center and copa, during the settlement to copa
I want to know what journal entries it will reflect in FI,Profit center and Copa.
Regards,
Chandu

Dear,
         For customer project you should run the result anlaysis and this result anlaysis data you can settle to the COPA.
                             Then the settled data send to the value field which is given to the PA transfer strature in Settlement profile.
                                          The profit center is debited and credited .
                                           One controlling document is also generated which have cost reduced from WBS element to profibility segement.
Regards.

Settlement of WBS element down payments to an asset under constructions

The down payment (of the transactions tcode F-47 and tcode F-110), are
always settlement wbs element (tcode CJ88), we do not want to post down
payments to the receiving asset under construction (transaction type
180 or 181).
In the down payments are always taken into account in the settlement to
an asset. The settlement of the down payment is the actual reason for
the previous update of down payments in FI (Transaction type group
15). Furthermore, the settlement of down payments to assets should
not be capitalize.

When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA.

Settlement Through WBS element in CJ88

Dear Expert,
When I going settle one asse through WBS element P05/00204/CB, I got the follwing problem in SAP
Down payment to recipient 802000000006 0 area 01 amount 5,142.74 not cleared
Message no. AW605
Diagnosis
All downpayments were not cleared for the asset under construction for the receiver 802000000006 0 in area 01. An amount of 5,142.74 was not cleared, or too much was cleared.
You can only completely transfer an asset under construction if you reverse the down payments in the current fiscal year beforehand.
Procedure
Clear the downpayments that you want to settle to receiver 802000000006 0.
Should I find the vendor? If yes, how can I find exact vedor.
Regards
David

got it from PS forum

No costs visible for statistical WBS element

Hi,
The followin steps are the setup:
- Project with a statistical WBS element and a network below
- Create a PO with Account category "Fixed Asset"
- Fill in a fixed asset, but also a (statistical) WBS element (put field 'project' optional in customizing)
- execute a MIGO to book costs
Now when I run the cost report for this project using transaction CJI3 then I do NOT get the costs visible on this statistical WBS element.
HOWEVER when I do the same steps, but instead of putting a statistical WBS element I put the network (next to the fixed asset) then I do get the costs visible.
Is this normal or do I have to change something in order to get the costs visible for my statistical WBS element?
kindest regards
bert

Is this necessary?
Because in the end I want to book these costs as actual costs on my fixed asset...

Collective settlement with WBS element

hi all,
is it possible to do settlement collectively as in CO88 but w r t WBS element ?
Edited by: SIng on May 17, 2010 12:40 PM

thanks 2 all

Settle PREL WBS element to AUC

Dear,
In certain cases customer wants to settle partially released WBS elements to fixed assets under construction.
Is this possible?
Cuurently I am having an error when settling ("System status Created is active"). However when I check the business process 'Actual Settlement" for the PREL WBS element it is stated to be active (green alert).
rgds,
bert

This is standard behaviour of system as I understand. In WBS system status hierarchy is like as below.
CRTD->PREL>REL>TECO-->CLSD. System set PREL when below level WBS 1.1 is REL, So, indirectly on 1 lEvel WBS will have both status active at same time i.e PREL and CRTD. So, Eventhough actual settlement is green in PREL but it is blocked by CRTD status.
However, for confirmation you can alwalys check in SE38 CNSTATUS Report which disply you inconsistancy in System status.
If someone have other openion / view please share. Interesting question !
With Regards
Nitin P.

User exit for checking Actual dates before TECO of WBS element

Hi,
Is there a user exit in PS we can use that checks to see if Actual dates have been entered on the WBS element before the WBS element is set to TECO?

Hi,
I am not sure on this as i havent checked it. You can explore and check if defining validations can serve your purpose.
Best Regards,
Gokul

Cost Before settlement in WBS element

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for