Cost Component Splitting in Joint Production

Hello.
I meet a trouble in the cost component splitting for the co-product.
I tried to creat a BOM like :
                             A                       B
                              C (CCS1)           D(CCS2)
the raw material C&D are in different cost component,and the manufacturing matertials are A&B.
and I set the apportionment structure like A(CCS1 100%,CCS2 50%)   B(CCS1 0%, CCS2 50%)
Then i run the CK11N,and the result is correct.
But the problem is as following:
when I creat a BOM like :
                             A                       B
                                          E
                              C (CCS1)          D(CCS2)
the raw material C&D are in different cost component,and the semi-product matertial is E,then E is producted for finished product A&B.
and I set the apportionment structure like A(CCS1 100%,CCS2 50%)   B(CCS1 0%, CCS2 50%)
then i run the CK11N,and the result is wrong.
whatever i set the apportionment structure,the result of the CCS is A (CCS1 50%,CCS2 50%),B(CCS1 50%,CCS2 50%)
anybody can tell me how i can get the correct result?
                                                                                Roc
Edited by: Roc Roc on Jan 4, 2010 11:42 AM

Hi
Make cost splitting structure and assigne to Production Cost Center.
Run Cost splitting KSS2 for cost splitting according to activity types.
bukhari

Similar Messages

Cost component split: incorrect allocation of by-product generated

Hi everyone,
I have a question involving the costs of by-products generated and their allocation on the cost component split.
Suppose that a production order, besides the main product, also generates a secondary product. By-products in standard system are confirmed with movement type 531. In transaction OMJJ this movement is linked to key GBB / ZOF. This key is assigned to a G/L account and this account is assigned to a cost element in OKTZ.
Example:
GBB / ZOF > G/L account 1000 > Cost component 10
Thus, the by-product generated should be allocated to the cost component number 10.
However, this does not happen. These costs are allocated to another cost component. This is because SAP ERP appears to use the key GBB / VBR to calculate the cost component split.
To summarize: for accounting purposes the system uses the GBB / ZOF (which is correct!), but in the cost component structure the system seems to use the GBB / VBR (which makes the costs of by-product being incorrectly assigned).
GBB / ZOF > G/L account 1000 > Cost component 10 (used ONLY for accounting purposes).
GBB / VBR > G/L account 2000 > Cost component 20 (it seems to be used in cost component split). INCORRECT!
Can anyone confirm whether that statement proceeds?
Regards,
Kelson

Hi
This behaviour is corect.... Consumption accounts are used in Cost Comp Str (CCS)
GBB-ZOF is actualy sort of COGM accounts specified in GBB-AUF which is used to Credit the order at the time of GR from prod order
Just the way, AUF is not used in CCS, ZOF is also not used...
You need to maintain separate account in GBB-VBR for the consumption of By Products... For this, the val class of By products need to be separate
Else, if yu dont wanna do this - have a separate Origin Group in the Mat Master of By products and You can assign the Combo of GL Account + Origin Group to a separate Cost Component
br, Ajay M

Product Costing - Standard Cost Component Split on Multi Level BOM's

Hi,
We are the process of introducing SAP for all back office and manufacturing activities.
I am currently trying to verify that the product cost calculation for Multi-Level BOMs in our Legacy system matches the cost roll up or cost estimate in SAP at not only a Total Cost Level but the cost component split must be accurate also. So far, all the costs roll up correctly at a total cost level but I have noticed one issue:
When I run a cost estimate for a single level BOM the cost estimate will split the components accurately into Material, Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable overhead, However, when this component is then used in the next level of manufacturing all the Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable Overhead Cost is grouped under Material.
Q1.) Is there a SAP setting or config change that will keep the previous Labor, Fixed OH and Variable OH cost in these categories as the material is rolled up to finished product level?
Q2.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the Finished Goods Standard Cost split by each of there rolled up Components? This would need to split the Total Material, Total Labor, Total Fixed OH and Total VO required to make the Finished Product.
Q3.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the added value (Absorption) by component split (Labor, Fixed OH, Variable OH) for every Manufactured Part?
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Brian

Actuall I just tried again and it did ask for me S number and I put it in and I did not have "authorization" to access
Error Message - Access denied (R/3)
What happened?
You do not have permission to access this Object
What can you do?
Please contact a consulting adminstrative
Error code: WEBSMP106-20080214172231-0015
Error details: 2491DD9-702/1A053/3162-71A9CFA5-3CB9265-2992F9
Service Name: SAPIDB
Service Server: WEBSMP106
Process-ID: 4640
Thread-ID: 6020
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Your SAP Service Marketplace Team

Primary cost component split not happening

Hello Experts,
I am trying to create a Primary cost component split for Products with following settings
1. Creation of Primary cost component structure "1N" and marking it as Primary cost component
2. Assigning the Primary cost elements to the Cost component structure
3. Assigning the Primary cost component structure for the Company code and Plant
4. Assigning the Primary cost component structure to "Version" under "Price calculation" tab.
5. Activity type with Activity type category "1- Manual entry, Manual allocation" and Price Indicator "1 - Plan price, automatically based on activity"
6. Activity output planning for Cost center
7. Primary cost planning for the Cost centers
8. Activity price calculation. (Update run) - Prices are changed in KP26 also
9. After all the above steps I checked report S_ALR_87013644, Plan price is existing in the report as mentioned in SAP note: 1658589
After all the above steps, I tried running Cost estimate for a product. I am getting the error message
Cost element 90001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Also, I am getting a message
No structure could be determined for internal activity TEB (M0001)
Message no. CK694
Therefore the Cost component is showing only the Material component.
Where "90001" is a secondary cost element. I am not sure why system is still searching for Secondary cost element where we have assigned Primary cost component structure. I also ensured that Primary cost elements used in planning are all assigned to a Component in Cost component structure.
I checked for SAP note "1736332", which is not applicable for my system version. Current version of SAP_APPL is Release 606 and Support package SAPKH60607.
Please help. Am I missing any settings.
Thank you in advance.
Muneer Ahamed N

Hi Muneer,
Please check whether you have maintained cost center splitting structure properly and assigned to the respective cost center for which you have maintained output planning and input planning.
This splitting structure is much required because there only we maintain the relationship between primary cost elements and activities.
Coming to your first message, yes system expects maintenance of secondary cost elements also in the cost component structure which is not primary CCS.
Inorder to show primary cost component structure view:
First, system calculates the direct activity cost in terms of secondary cost elements...
Next, it verifies the cost center splitting structure you made,
Then, system is going to convert the direct activity cost in terms of primary cost elements based on the splitting structure and Finally displays the primary cost component view
I suppose second message speaking about cost center splitting structure only, please go through it carefully
Other than these whatever the process you specified is right only..
Regards...
Jose

Itemization does not match cost component split

Hi,
I need your help or could you please shed some light as to how to fix .
A new Overhead was created, in order to add expenses to the pricing of the product. For it a variant of different pricing to which is used currently was created, and so for maintain a historic one of the information.
In addition, in the cost component Structure an adjustment of the configuration was carried out, this was done because the previous the cost component Structure contained 18 elements of costs, which the most of the elements were specified as fixed and variable costs, therefore the system only permitted the addition of 2 more elements (SAP only permits 20 elements of fixed and variable costs), nevertheless was necessary to create a total of 23 elements of costs. For it the previous elements have to be modified and to change some elements as variable costs, specifically the elements corresponding to the accounts of materials. using tcode OKTZ
The addition of 5 more elements of costs, corresponding to overhead elements, where the type 41 costs classes were configured from the plan of surcharge created.
After carrying out the changes and to transport them the client of production, when i execute the T-code ck13n an inconsistency in the previous pricings was generated, because the cost component Structure was modified and the the following one Nº message was showed: CK869 " Mat.XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split, the report of itemization shows different values to the reports of Costed Mutilevel BOM and of Cost Components. Additionally to the error shown by the system, also is observed that to the Cost Components report a cost in the new elements of overhead was added, even when the calculation of previous cost did not contain the determination of overhead.
In order to fix the error, I modified the cost component structure as it was before and the created another cost component structure with the required changes requested by the client specifying that it should start to be current this year. However after that change the error message nºCK869 continue: Mat. XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split. Adding to that error message, the cost of the finished product changes with reference to the calculus of the previous product after modified the configuration and that is because the cost of the semifinished product is not being taken the values of the row material, and it is appearing with cost 0 and the only value that is taking on the matter are the costs of the activities types.

If you want the message to go away then you need to mark and releasse the estimate. However, there is no requirement that you do this. The message you are getting is an informational message only. You can continue without re-costing the item. If you do re-cost the material the new cost estimate will reflect and changes you've made to the components, so there is a good chance you will get a different value with the new estimate. So if that's ok, go ahead and mark and release the new estimate.

Cost Component Splits

Hello,
We're using Special Procurement Keys in order to transfer cost estimates in a production plant to a DC. These cost estimates currently all come over with a full cost component split. For plants that do not belong to the same company, we don't want to see the cost component split at the receiving plant.
Is there any way to use Special Procurement Keys or Transfer Control so that Intercompany plant relationships don't transfer the cost component splits?
Thanks,
Nick

Hello Nick,
In SAP Product Costing, the cost will allway be stored in cost components and it will be tranferred in similar way to to higher level and tranfer to another plant. Even earlier we have faced similar issue. The better way is to understand how the system stores and do work around.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Santosh

Cost component Split not transferring while costing using Spec Prc Key

Hi Fellow CO consultants,
I have come across an strange scenario in my work could you help me on it . We are using special procurement key to get the prices between cross company code costing while doing costing run the Materials which have the cost component split from KKPAN (costing without quantity structure ) we find an strange behaviour of update of the costing price .
scenario 1:That is Using KKPAN the FG materials are costed with fixed and variable cost and are marked (future ) but not released in the Production plant . Now while doing the CK40n at warehouse level the Cost component split is correctly picked up the receiver plant using the Spec Prc key properly the fixed and variable cost split .
But
Scenario 2: Using KKPAN the FG materials are costed and then price is released and the material price is at current standard price .Now while doing the CK40N run the cost component split is not picking the variable and fixed contribution its picking up the Total price of the material .( this behavior is observed only in materials done with KKPAN other materials with quantity structure provides the variable and fixed itemization even in the current price of the material ) The prerequsite of the transfer control statergy is set as fist to check the future price for the fiscal year and next the current price of the material if no future price exist. The cost component split and the costing variant are the same .
Appreciate your thoughts .. on helping Scenario 2 case why does the cost component split take the fixed and variable cost while the price of the material is in Current.
regards
GK

Dear Prasad
Try masking costing variant too at assignment to plant and co code.
Rajneesh

Error in CK11n - The system could not determine a cost component split for

Hi All,
When i run CK11n i have following error:
The system could not determine a cost component split for the internal activity with activity type 502000 of cost center 10100.
Procedure
Check the master data for activity type 502000 of cost center 10100. It is possible that no activity price calculation has been carried out for the cost center.
could any one give me solution
Thanking you.

Well, did you run activity price calculation for the relevant cost center(s)?
The CCS you're using for product costing (either your COGM split, or the auxillary) has been marked as a "primary" cost component split. It wants to break secondary costs down into their cost components, and assign those components to components in its own structure.
Wihout a planned CCS for the activity, this isn't possible. (This is normally calculated by KSPI during planning.)
Either calculate an activity CCS is KSPI, assuming that all the prerequisites are in place for that, or uncheck the "primary cost component split" indicator in your costing variant configuration.

Reference to note 434873 - Auxiliary cost component split

1) We use material ledger. We already have a primary cost component split defined in our system.
2) We want to activate an auxiliary cost component split.
3) We read the note 434873, paragraph 2)b) (activating an auxiliary cost component split).
4) Who can assist us to develop the customer-specific Z program that is referenced in the note?

Hi to Evrybody,
I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning! Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration! We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
Best Regards,
Georgi Georgiev

Activating Cost Component Split

Hi People,
I have to do some tests and for while i need to activate the "cost component split" in the path:
\IMG\ Controlling\ Product Cost Controlling \ Actual Costing/Material Ledger \ Actual Costing \ Activate Actual Cost Component Split (by valuation area)
I would like to know if there is some impacts for that and
if we have some problems to revert, becuase at this moment it is only a test.
Thanks,
Rosana.

Hello Paul,
Thanks for your answer.
We already use "material ledgder" but we don´t have activate component split. But look, what I am talkin is only one transaction (that I said before), becuase I have to do some test inside the aplication BW and it is a prerequisite.
I would like to know what is the impact to activate the component split on that transaction I said before.
It is only a test, but I don´t know if I put a flag in that transaction, the system will create some table internally.
And other thing I don´t know is, if It it is possible to reverte the activation (only in that transaction) that I would update and if there is some impacts.
Thanks a lot.

Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

Hi,
My issue is as follows.
Production process spans across 2 company codes.
Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
I would be grateful for any ideas.
Thanks,
Szymon

Hi Udo / Szymon.
I have a question about this issue.
In the sap help about multiple valuations / group costing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
Could you clarify about this?
thanks!!
Arturo.
Group Valuation
Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

ML Document: Cost Component Split (Elements) for Values

Hi peolple!
Could you help me to know how I can find the table to find de follow situation:
The line of diference that is created after the Material Ledger is closed, for example, in the line Production Receipts.
After closing month, In the CKM3, in the line "Production", the line "Receipts from lower levels" is created (we know the reason).
I neeed the table where we can find the values of this diference by cost component.
I already saw the table: MLKEPH.
This one give me the information, but show us other registers with values, and based on only this table, we don´t have how to take only the register we need.
Thanks,

MLPRKEKO ML Document: Cost Component Split (Header)
MLPRKEPH ML Document: Cost Component Split (Compone

Auxiliary cost component splitting issue in CK11N

Hi Friends,
We are using primary cost component split for the auxiliary cost component structure for getting more information. We have a machine cost in the main cost component which is split in three auxiliary cost component i.e. Energy, Maintenance and depreciation.
My belief is that with the activation of primary cost component split the costs have to flow from cost center in its primary cost element form to this cost component structure.
With the current data that we have, the cost component split is seen for all the three cost elements in the auxiliary cost component split u2013 But we are not able to trace the source of this amount as we do not have any splitting structure in place, the plan costs are only for Energy not for Maintenance and depreciation.
OKES Configuration:
Selection for assignment:
Cost Element               GMACHINE (only for Energy)
Activity Type     MACH
Splitting rules:
10                                        21     Equivalence Numbers Planning
Machine 0.64 is splitting into as follows Depreciation 0.41, Energy 0.12 and Maintenance 0.11
I am afraid from where splitting happening for Energy and depreciation and there is not receiving   splitting rules.
Appreciate for quick reply
Thanks
Govind

Hi to Evrybody,
I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning! Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration!                                                                 We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
Best Regards,
Georgi Georgiev

Change Analyze cost component split CK80_99 or CK13N.

HI experts,
How or where can i change report CK80_99 or CK13N? I don´t know which is it report? I need some summarization row to this report, for example:
Cost component split:
10 raw material
20 wraps
10-20 material in sum - Summarization
30 wages
40 overhead
10-40 production costs - sumarization
Thanks a lot, for Your help.
Gustavo

Hi,
CK13N transaction allows you to see information of standard costs in below formts.
1.Cost itemisation-cost of each item which is responsible for standard cost and summation of all elements in last row.
2.Cost component-these are configured cost sets based on local cost reporting method.
3.Costing level with cost component-This replica of your BOM structure with additional information cost for each level.
Your issue is realated with #2 in the above list.
I hope following steps will help you to get that information,
In CK13 transaction call the cost component report.Download this report into excel format and sum up as per your requirement.
or else if you want configure existing cost components under expected groups in cost component config.
Hope this helps you.
Ashok

Material Ledger : Cost component split different in CO PC and ML

Hello SAP People,
In ML cost component split I don't have the same split that in CK13N COPC.
History
We changed the cost component structure in OKTZ, because we wanted to split on two different cost component the cost of Copper :
-     Copper
-     Primes :Premium cost (transformation cost for producer) on copper.
In CK11N the split is OK and we can read the new cost element corresponding to premium cost.
To split the costing tool goes on the purchase info records to read condition type that are different for copper and premium.
The problem we have is that when we run Material ledger we are not able to see after a good receipt a similar split in the cost component view.
We already run MLCCS_RESET and MLCCS_Startup programs this month and created new Raw material after. But it seems the ML do not take care of this and all the actual cost (I stop to single level) are on the copper cost component and there is nothing on Premium cost component.
We just run single level on ML for current month.
Could you please help me to explain why we are not able to obtain the correct split between Copper and u201CPrimesu201D

Hi Marco,
yes, these both are independent from each other. You will have no issue when these are different.
It is very typical that you want to report different kind of information for activities as for materials.
A typical setup might be
Activity                                   Material
Asset depreciation                   Raw Material Cost
Room cost                               Energy
Labour                                     Production Cost
labour overhead                      Production Overhead
Electricity                                 Packaging
When you use the activity for the production of a material (confirmation CO15) the assignment goes normally to a single cost component in the material, above for example into production cost. This is controlled by the cost element. Only when the primary cost component split is activated and a transfer structure betweeen both is maintained you could achieve
Asset depeciation, Room Cost, Labour overhead -> Production overhead
Labour -> Production Cost
Electricity -> Energy
Best regards, Udo

Cost Component Splitting in Joint Production

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for