Cost element  is not assigned to a cost component

Dear All,
On trying to run costing for finished good having one BOM component, system create error in costing log as-
Message no-239-Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component     1
On seeing details:
Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Diagnosis
The system attempted to generate the cost component split for the material, but discovered that no assignment has been made in cost component structure Z2 for cost element 954001 and possibly for origin group .
System Response
The cost component split is incomplete. The cost of goods manufactured in the cost component split is therefore less than in the itemization.
ProcedureGo into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and carry out the assignment for cost component structure Z2 and chart of accounts AICA.
where i am missing the required setting.
please guide
regards

Hi,
Use T.Code OKTZ for the relative cost element has to be assigned to one of the components there in
the cost component structure. Choose the nature of assignment for eg. raw material, choose the source and give the cost element.  Then choose Assignment and give settlement through Cost center, Order.While coming back activate the cost component structure and save.  Try for the Costing.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Similar Messages

  • Cost element is not assigned to cost component structure

    Dear Team,
    While doing the settlemnt through KO88 system is showing the message like below
    Cost element 433001 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct Z1
         Message no. MLCCS 010
    Diagnosis
         You have activated the actual cost component split.
         No cost component has been assigned to cost element 433001 origin group
         in cost component structure Z1 for chart of accounts XXX. The system is
         unable to assign the value to a cost component.
    System Response
         You cannot carry out posting.
    Procedure
         Check whether for this operation the value to be posted is to be
         assigned to this cost element.
    User has done tchnically completed from CO side .But system is showing the open status in FI.
    So we have suggested to the user to do settlemt through KO88 system is showing the above message .Half of the production orders we can able to close through Ko88. Some of the PO we are facing the above issue.The concern GL account showing by the system is maintained as a sundry receivables a/c.
    Please advice how to proceed further.
    Thanks for the consideration.
    Regards,
    Suma

    Dear Sir,
    System is showing the GL account  is not relating the cost element a/c ,The concern account belongs to Sundry receivables account.
    The configuration is done correctly with  all expenses GL a/c in OKTZ as well WIP accounts assigned corrctly in  OKG8.                How the system is showing this account which i am not understanding.
    Please advice to resolve.
    Thanks for the consideration.
    Regards,
    Suma

  • CO-PC Cost components are not assigned when actual cost was posted

    Hi Expert,
    I estimate material cost by Tcode CK11N, the result is cost components were assigned to plan cost. It's okay. But, I have a problem when posting actual cost.
    After actual cost was posted by confirming backflush, I run Tcode KKBC_PKO to check again, but Cost Component field is not assigned to actual cost.
    Please tell me the reason.
    Regard,

    Hi,
    Thank for your answer.
    I will check Cost component Structure, and ensure that all cost elements were assigned.
    Additional, cost components were assigned to PLAN cost, but not assigned to ACTUAL cost.
    Do I have to configure something more?
    Regard,

  • Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct

    Dear All,
    How to change the standard price in MR21 for materials with Price Determination Control 3 ( header level V & 3) (Split level S & 3)
    In MR21, when I am updating the price for initial stock uploading.
    It throws me a error Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostComp Struct 01
    Actually the cost component structure 01 is not active. we are using OP cost component structure & it is active , further the  assigned to  the company code level.
    Cost element 7000218 is assigned to the cost component structure OP.
    please suggest why it result in above error, even though we are not using cost component structure 01.
    Regards
    Subbu.

    Hi,
    Did you change the cost component structure assignment for the plant ?
    This error could be produced due to the fact that for this plant the cost component struture was changed from 01
    But ML tables makes reference to the old cost component structure.
    You can check table CKMLKEV.
    During the creation of the material the system creates data for the current, previous and last period of the last year (12 2010).
    Therefore the system tries/ needs to create also a cost componet split for the period 12 2010. For this it must used the cost component structure for this period 12 2010 (maybe 01).
    In such a case you have to define the cost element in '01' as well.
    Please do read note 434873 carefully for the side effect and correct procedure to change cost component structure.
    regards
    Waman

  • Permit not assigned for Actual cost

    Hi Dears,
    Permit not assigned for actual cost in maint order
    Actual cost in maintenance order is 3000
    In IPMD, cost1 is assigned with class ACTUAL COST and value 3000 is defined.
    In OIPG,  Permit class ACTUALCOST is assigned.
    Goods issue done to order for value 3000.
    Again cost determination executed, but still cost1 is not assinged to the work order.
    Am i missing anything ?
    Regards,
    Alagesan M

    Hi
    In charac CT04 i maintained one value 3000 and table maintained CSEVPERMIT and IKOSTEN
    In class CL01, assigned the charac for 049 class type
    In OIPG, permit class is maintained with class
    In IPMD, new permit created and assigned class in classification and maintained 3000
    Now order created and component assigned the planned value is 3000.
    through MIGO goods issue done and found the actual value is 3000.
    But still opened the permit found nothing assigned.
    For Estimated cost and planned costs it is working good only for actual cost permit is not assigning.
    Actual cost we need to anything more other than this ?
    Alagesan

  • Creation of cost element or not for GBB-VAX,GBB-INV and UMB

    Dear Experts,
    I have few doubt regarding creation of cost element. Whether i will create Cost element or not.
    1) GBB-VAX - used in PGI(Vl02n)We have costing based COPA .whether we will create cost element or not.If i will create cost element then need to be bydefault in okb9 with PSG tick.
    2) GBB-INV- Used for Material taging(MI01,MI04,MI07)whether we will create cost element or not.If i will create cost element then what will be my cost object and how i will charge from my product costing.
    3) UMB- is used whenever standard price is changed. Shall i create cost element for the same
    If yes hen what will be my cost object and how i will charge from my product costing.
    Request you to help me on the same.
    regards
    RR

    1) GBB-VAX -  No, Goods Issue for sales order with no assignment object and hence without Cost Element
    2) GBB-INV- Yes to post expenditure/income from inventory differences
    3) UMB- Yes
    Regards
    KS

  • Cost element does not exist in CO

    Hi SAP folks,
    In new co code we have copied GL codes from co code 1000. Now while changing cost element in KA02 system gives error message like "Cost element does not exist in controlling area". Why this error message is comming, however all cost elements are automate come from co code 1000....right....how to solve this issue...please anyone do help.....
    how to copy cost elements to new co code from co code 1000 and How to extend existing cost centers to new code. Ex: co code 1122 has 3 cost centers and we need to extend the same to co code 1123. Controlling area is same for both co codes.
    Thanks

    Hi Eli,
    Really, i appreciated for your help.
    But, still my question is not to be answered. I am giving entire picture what i have done earlier.
    1. I have copied 2 co codes(CACA & CACB) from 1000 co code
    2. I have created new chart of a/c (CACA) and assigned to co codes
    3. I have co area as INT and assigned to co codes
    4. I have copied gl codes to 2 co codes from 1000
    5. I have created 5 cost centers newly in 1 co code area
    Here my question is:
    - We need to extend same cost centers to another co code
    - When i am changing cost element, system gives error like no CE in co area..why? and how to resolve?
    Thanks

  • Activity Type: cost element does not exist

    Dear All,
    I am working on ERP  configuration for PP module as an academic exercise. I am already through with FI, CO and MM modules.
    I am not able to get through the Activity assignment step in PP module. (Accounting u21D2 Controlling u21D2 Cost Center Accounting u21D2 Master Data u21D2 Activity Type u21D2 Individual Processing u21D2 Create). While creating activity type labor (labor hours), I am getting error "cost element does not exist for aggregated period"
    In CO module I have created primary cost element for "Labor"(Category: primary cost/ cost reducing revenues). Also created secondary cost element for labor (cost element category: Internal activity allocation).
    Can anybody guide me on how to go further?
    regards,
    Supriya

    Dear
    Please revivew the following steps when you are creating a New Acvity type :
    OP51 - Check Settings for formulas
    OP54 - Check formulas for Costing
    Ensure that usage of the parameters are indicated.  Some parameters are appropriate for capacity calculation but not for schedule calculation.  If you like to find out the parameter id, you could use the Search Fld. for Param. pull down button to do so.
    KLH2 - Maintain hierarchy of Activity type group.
    OP19 - Define standard value key
    The purpose of standard value keys is to group together a set of parameters for the purpose of ensuring that the standard values for the parameters are supplied in the operations of the routing.  This is so that the formula (for calculating cost, schedule, and capacity) could have the necessary figures to work with.  Once the parameters are associated with the standard value keys, work centers quoting this standard values will be able to dictate whether or not the parameter values are optional or mandatory entry in the operations of the routing.  The pre-requisite for using this transaction is that the parameters must have been pre-created.
    KA01 - Create Primary Cost Element for the new activities type. Maintain Correct From and To date inline with Activity Type KL01  - Create Activity Type tied to the primary cost element. (the Cost element field)
    KP26  - Change Activity Type/Activity Price Planning - maintain the Variable price
    If the user include the additional activities in their work center, the routing that used the work center will required more time to finished the jobs.
    The operations Start and Finish date will be extended due to the extra time spent on the work center.  The cost of production increases in line with the extra activity which will be reflected in the Factory Output when you do a cost analysis in the production order.   The new activity will have a price attached to it and the moving average price will increase.
    Regards
    JH

  • CK11N alert:"Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component"

    Hi,
         When I use CK11N, fill in all the necessary field, there will appear a alert.
          The detail as follows:
    Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component
    Message no. CK 334
    Diagnosis
    No cost component is assigned to costing item 00001.
    System Response
    The costs for the costing item are not shown.
    Procedure
    Go into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and check the assignment of cost elements to cost components.
           I have used KA03,KL03,CR03 to checked previous datas, but I find no errors?
    What is the problem?

    Hi,
    Use OKTZ to create cost component structure.
    Check for some of these settings also
    Configuration:
    Define costing sheets
    OKTZ create cost component structure
    OKK4 Define valuation variant
    OKKN Define cost variant
    Master Data:
    KP26 setup activity rates
    CR01 setup work centers
    MM01 setup material masters
    CS01 setup Bill of Materials
    CA01 setup routings
    Regards,
    Murali

  • BPS Variable-Cost Element is not displaying Text

    Dear Team,
    We have a peculiar issue one of the BPS Variable defined for Cost Element is not displaying text in one of the Planning Layouts.
    Another variable is displaying text in another layout.
    Surprisingly...when I reused the old variable in the new layout it is also not displaying the text.
    Am I missing something....appreciated your quick support.
    Thanks & Best Regards
    Srinivas

    Have you check the layout Lead-Column setting? Is it set to 'Key/Description'?

  • Webi report on OLAP Bex query -  Cost element Hierarchy not working Drill down

    Hello,
    We have a BO report on Bex query, Not on universe, we have a Hierarchy for Cost Element Group, and we are expecting the Drill down functionality for that in BO report, but it does not.
    Webi report on OLAP Bex query -  Cost element Hierarchy not working Drill down
    Any pointers how to do it please
    Thanks
    Krishna

    Hi,
    WebI reports on BEx source don't use same Drill feature as other sources, it's replaced by expland/collapse of hierarchy nodes (documented in WebI user guide in § "24.1 Drill defined"). This means you have to create query which selects all hierarchy sub-tree you plan on exploring later in report, otherwise if no data is available under a node there will be no '+/-' sign to visit this part of tree.
    You could try first to select "All members" from hierarchy in QueryPanel and see if behavior in report suits your needs. Then you should restrict hierarchy member selection to what's really needed to avoid performance issues.
    Regards,
    Loic

  • Cogs-is it cost element or not

    hi
    COGS should be taken as cost element or not, it takes- what is the costobject and shall i send to copa or not
    sowmya
    Moderator: Please, search SDN

    Hi,
    Make COGS as CE in MTO scenario only   (GBB-VAY) for bringing to COPA.
    If it GBB-VAX do not create it as CE
    regards,
    neeraja

  • Planni values at cost element group level instead of at cost element level

    Is it possible to plan values at cost element group level instead of at cost element level in BI?
    Similary I have another question for financial statements.
    Is it possible to plan values at financial statement level instead of at G/ in BPS or SEM?
    Thanks

    Hi.
    It depends on what you mean "cost element group".
    If you mean node (not leaf) in hierarchy so the answer is NO.
    If cost element group is regular characteristic so the answer is YES.
    Regards.

  • Plannig values at cost element group level instead of at cost element lev

    Is it possible to plan values at cost element group level instead of at cost element level in BPS or SEM?
    Similary I have another question for financial statements.
    Is it possible to plan values at financial statement level instead of at G/ in BPS or SEM?
    Thanks

    You mean that I am on the wrong forum. Which forum is useful  for me for this question?
    Thanks

  • Depreciation GL is Cost element or Not?

    HI,
    In Asset accounting,will we create Depreciation GL account as Cost element or normal?If we create as cost element what are the additional configuration needed.
    Kindly clarify me
    Thanks
    Sunitha

    Hi,
    you only need a cost element if you want to post the depreciation also to the Controlling application CO. Then you need it to include cost centers or internal orders into the depreciation documents. If you don´t need depreciation in CO, you do not need to create these cost elements.
    Regards,
    Markus

Maybe you are looking for