Cost element report prob. with auxiliary account assignment
Hi,
WBS is statistical.
Orders are auxiliary account assigned to WBS.
When running cost element reports, cji3 ; settlement cost elements are not showing there for the order.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,
Harsh.
Edited by: Harsh Saxena on Dec 8, 2010 2:12 PM
NOT RESOLVED
Similar Messages
-
Hi ,
I have defined some primary cost elements regarding consumption with category 1.
Now when I execute the cost center report (S_alr_87013611), system is not showing any figures regarding these consumption cost elements.
I checked with FBL3N for such consumption accounts and found that there are postings made to the accounts. Controlling documents have also been generated for the transaction effecting the consumption accounts.
What could be the reason due to which the system is not showing the figures in Controlling report?
How to solve this?
MakrandHi Makarand,
you have difined in OKB9 the default cost center. This cost center will be picked only if there is no other cost object found at the time of posting.
As you siad all these posting happend to Production Order.
When the system able to find the a cost object on it own (in the given case, Production Order is the real cost object and the costs need to flow to only Production Order), then system will not consider the definitions in OKB9.
OKB9 is relevant only when we don't give any cost object. In such case it will pick up the cost object defined in OKB9.
When you are doing the confirmation of materials to production Order, Production Order will have over riding affect on the setting on OKB9.
Hope you got the point
Please let me know if you need further details in this regard
Surya -
Can we create a cost element for a Balance Sheet account?
Hi folks,
Is it possible to create a cost element for a balance sheet account? If yes, what are the scenerios we would need it and how is it done?
thanks in advanceHello
Please review the below information regarding cost elements category 90 : Financial Accounting Balance Sheet Accounts
Category 90 is automatically assigned when you create cost elements in CO whose general ledger accounts in FI are asset reconciliation accounts
(special balance sheet accounts), not income statement accounts. You
cannot change this category in CO master data maintenance.
FI does not require CO account assignments to cost elements of
category 90. However, if you enter an account assignment, it is only
recorded statistically for real objects.
Category 90 allows you to check order or project budgets for fixed
asset procurement. To do so, enter the investment order or WBS element
in the corresponding field in the asset master. The Asset Management
component ensures that the order or element automatically appears in
the document when you access the asset procurement.
The R/3 System debits the order/WBS element statistically in the
Controlling component, which you can then monitor with availability
control.
You can treat cost elements of category 90 as activity-independent as
part of cost center planning.
Also see note 75980 for further information. From the note:
The use of cost element category 90 is only provided in the standard
system in the following two cases:
1. As of Release 3.0G, asset acquisitions and down payments which are
assigned directly to a fixed asset or asset under construction can
be assigned to an account on internal orders or WBS elements
statistically. In this manner, for example, an availability check
can be triggered on the order or the WBS element for asset posting.
2. As of Release 4.0, cost elements of category 90 can also be created
for material stock accounts to display material make-to-order stocks
on sales orders or customer projects.
Regards
Javier Reviriego -
Meaning of error AA449 Auxiliary account assignment to asset not possible
We are having problem posting asset entries created by GJT3 - JVA Asset Retirement. Entries process successfully through cutback GJCB but post of asset entries fails with error AA449 - Auxiliary account assignment to asset not possible.
KOSTL is activated for account assignment via Financial Accounting -> Asset Accounting -> Integration with General Ledger -> Additional Account Assignment Objects -> Activate Account Assignment Objects.
I added KOSTL for all TTypes in Specify Account Assignment Types for Account Assignment Objects (ACSET). This did not fix the problem.
Can anyone help please? I have searched all forums and OSS on error AA449 and have found no solution.
SteveHello Steve
I am not currently accessing SAP system, so mentioning specific T codes is difficult.
However, in SAP menu, go to SAP>FI>Asset Acctg>Master records>display
Now when u check the record, you can make out if cost assignments are completed
Now coming to dep area checking, you need to go to IMG > FI>AA>Lean implementation> depreciation area settings.
I amy be wrong, but pls recheck
assign pts if useful -
Consuming document with different account assignment from Earmarked Funds
Hi,
We have implemented Public Sector FM functionality in version ECC 6.0 and we are using Earmarked Funds (Funds Reservation).
The system is allowing to post consuming documents with different account assignment from that in the
Funds reservation document nevertheless we donu2019t have set the indicator 'Acct.asst.changeable' in the Funds Reservation document.
I don't need the fields Fund Center and Commitment Item to be transfered from earmarked funds document (Define Rules for Account Assignment Transfer). Instead, if consuming document have a different account assignment, the user should get the error message no. RE603 'Account assignment differs from document XX 001'.
In version 4.6C it worked this way. In our case the Fund Center is delivered from Cost Center and Commitment Item is delivered from Cost Element (SAP - Derivation Strategy for FM Object Assignment).
I hope someone can help me.
Thanks in advance,
RodrigoHi,
You get the error message RE603 when you make the settings below:
1. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Account assignment transfer > Define rules for account assignment transfer; you flag the 'Active' boxes for account assignment (sort of conterintuitive).
2. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Change message control; change RE603 to 'E'.
3. In Earmarked fund document, flag the 'Acct.asst. changeable' box (totally conterintuitive).
Please give it a try and let us know the outcome.
Regards,
Ming -
Cost centre field in sales order account assignment screen
Hello all,
I am unable to find the settings for cost center field in sales order account assignment tab screen along with profit center and internal order. kindly let me know the path to select cost center.
Thanks in advance
RajuThe Cost Center Determination settings is in OVF3 - but there are some cases where the Cost Center must be exceptionally changed.
If the document category for order type in IMG VOV8 is defined to be "I" which belong to order type FD - Deliv.Free of Charge, then the field cost center is active for input during transaction VA01.
Alternatively, you can specify an order reason and assign a cost center to an order reason.
However the standard SAP works only at the header level though, so it would not work if cost center is needed on the line item.
The cost center are assign for such business transactions as :
- Free deliveries
- Returns
- Deliveries of advertising materials
You can also make cost center allocation dependent on the order reason, for example:
Order reason: Damage in transit
Order reason: Free sample
Both the IMG settings are done in transaction OVF3, either with/without the order reason. -
Services with multiple account assignment.
Hi all,
How can I find out the POs which are having the multiple account assignment for the service line items from tables ?
I am looking for services with multiple account assignments
RegardsHi
Go to SE16 , give table name -EKPO
Now if you have purchase order nos with you then copy paste the PO numbers here , or select company code or site to restrict your entries. It will control the performance of the data execution.
Then execute this (remove max no 200 ) . Go to Settings-- Format List -- Choose fields. Deselect all and select fields as per your requirement.If field names are coming in technical names you can change this via settings--User parameter and select -Field Label.
You can extract this report to excel as well. Same PO number with all account assignment category.
Please note if you have high volume of data then extract all the POs under service orders first from EKKO table and copy all the service PO numbers availbvale and paste in table EKPO, it will increase performance as well.
Cheers
Mukta -
Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem
Hi,
Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
JMHi Summer,
We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
there is one solution for this is set 'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO went into error in process after doing this.
Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
Thanks in advance
Vikas -
PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment
Hi ,
I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
Regards,
SheetalHi ,
I have checked it intially and both are identical.
Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
But after approval it again went into error in process
Sheetal -
Auxiliary Account Assignment not possible
When i am creating PO with Account category A for Asset Procurement at the time i assigned Asset master then system giving following error.
"Auxiliary Account Assignment not possible, remove entry'
Err No.AA449
Regards
VenkiHi
Message No AA449 shows ""Auxiliary account assignment to asset not possible, remove entry""
Hence check your entries
Thanks
Srinivas -
Hello All,
i am facing problem in <b>confirming the limit order with unknown account</b> <b>assinment</b>.We are using Extended classic scenario with SRM version 5.00 and ECC 6.00. When creating shopping cart with unknown account assignments, shopping carts is getting created fine but when processing goods receipt the system only prompts for distribution by cost center and we do not have the option to selected processing against other account assignment e.g. internal order or network. the Cost center is coming as gray.What i am expecting that as in known account assignment it asks for a drop down and user can select cost center or order the same should happened with unknown account assignment. we have not implemented any badi for the same.
please help me out. <b><u>Is this a standard behavior of shop with limit order for unknown account assignment where it prompts for cost center only or do i need to implement any badi.</u></b>Hi
<b>Related links/ SAP OSS Notes to check out -></b>
Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
Note 1046593 - Limit PO - Unable to delete and create new item
Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
Note 969077 - LIMIT:SC with Account Assignment Unknown and IR_IND checked
Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
Note 1052892 - Account Assignment not visible for Limit Shopping Cart
Note 933618 - Multiple account assignments for limit item are lost
Re: Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000
Creating SC with Dummy Account Assignment
Re: Account assignment on SRM
Re: Problem on account assignment
Re: Account details not coming while creating a Shopping Cart with Limit Item
LIMIT SC
<u>Other related details -></u>
Use Screen variants (Transaction - SHD0) to change item overview and search result screens.
BADI - There is one BADI to hide/show some SC item creation links, there is one BADI to control screen details of PO, CTR... but not SC (and not external screens).
So, as usual, identify the template and change the HTML code in SE80.
To implement a more complex logic, like the default check box, change the ABAP code (usually in the PBO), if required.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul -
Adding cost center on OKB9 with cost element company code with valuation ar
hi ,
can anybody help me out with the Adding cost center on OKB9 with cost element company code with valuation area configuration.
i have to do this configuration but do not know the detailed steps for that one.
Good points will be awarded.Hi Prem
Select the 1 in column acct assignment details column then in the left side in detail per business area/valuation area enter your valuation area.
Thanks
Ashok -
Auxiliary account assignment to asset possible remove entry
While selling f-92 asst sale iam gettign this error Auxiliary account assignment to asset possible,remove entry.
Please guide me on thisHi,
While doing F-92, you are not supposed to enter the asset no in Clearing Rev from Asset Sale GL line item. Instead you need to select check box Asset Retirement(just above text field) for the same line item and press enter, then system will prompts with another pop up window, where you need to enter the selling asset no and value date and Complete sale and ENTER.
Cheers,
Srinu -
AA449 (Auxiliary account assignment to asset not possible) error
Dear colleagues,
While posting asset sale through FB01, it is giving the following error: Auxiliary account assignment to asset not possible, remove entry (message no. AA449)
I have already checked the note 787350 and below thread that was previously discussed but we are on ECC 6.0, with support package SAPKH60405 note is not applicable.
http://bit.ly/gTdFA6
Regards
MetinHi Metin
1. Use Tr F-92
2. Specify Customer No in 1st screen & "Asset Sale Clearing Account" against Posting Key 50
This GL account should have Field Status Group G029 in Fs00
3. Tick the "Asset Retirement" check box in the above Gl acount and press entre
4. Enter the Asset No, Amount and other details in the next pop up screen
Br, Ajay M -
Report as per Customer Account Assignment group or Material Account Assig
Hi,
I require report as per customer account assignment group or material account assignment group.
Can you please tell me how to fullfill this requiremetn.
I have go for ZReport or any standard report is available.
Regards,
ch.srinivasHi,
You could have gone for a query but unfortunately,you cannot use table TSTMT in a query so I think ZREPORT would be a better option.
Regards
Karan
Maybe you are looking for
-
Cd/dvd drive no longer in bios-satellite a75 s206
I searched around here for a fix, guess I'm stuck-drive works in two other laptops, recognized as dvd drive, plays dvd's-tried the microsoft fix, but the filters mentioned don't exist in my registry in the location that's given-cdgone was no help-dow
-
Hi All, Our client requirment is T_code control for due date payment every day and follow the track of payment on time. Is there any T code for daily due date report. Please up
-
Hi, I have a function returning a boolean and I need to use it in a select statement. The result of the sql should be 1 it returns true and 0 for false. select case when my_function(a,b) = true then 1 else 2 end from dual Is there a way I can do this
-
Firewire part 2 - Need Help Refreshing My PMU
Recap: At some point a few months back, my FCP HD lost contact with my Canopus Datavideo. Under ABOUT MY MAC in HARDWARE>FIREWIRE it only states FIRE WIRE BUS and its speed. I have reloaded Quicktime and tried to REFRESH my AV connectons but to no av
-
X-Fi Xtreme Gamer - No audio device - Windows XP Media Edi
?I own quite a new Mesh Computer (UK) and in the last week or so the sound has stopped working. Windows is now thinking the sound card is not installed, although when you look in control panel, system you can see the card and it says it's working wit