COST ELEMENTS IN ACCOUNT BASED COPA

Hi all,
1. I understand that all FI/GL accounts correspond to COST   ELEMENTS in COPA.
2. I also understand that there are NO value fields in an Account Based Profitability Analysis.So there is no VALUE FIELD to KEY FIGURE mapping.
3. My question is: how do we map each individual GL account into BI?
4. If we dont map each individual GL account, how do we report these accounts in BI?
This part of Account based has been very confusing. I have searched numerous posts, but they all have the same answers, none that explains how we handle the numeric fields of account based profitability analysis.
Cheers
TJ

You will have a KF lets say amount
In account based COPA your Cost and revenue elements will identify what does the value in this KF corresponds to.
your report will look something like below:
Ex:
Cost and Revenue Element #     Amount
800 - Revenues                     1,000,000
808 - Sales deductions             100,000
800 - 808 = Net Revenue            900,000
893 - Cost of Sales               90,000
231 - Price Difference              10,000
Total                               1,000,000
You may get amount from source system in 2-3 diff currencies like controlling area curr, transaction curr...
Sometimes range of accounts correspond to a value. Ex: Accounts 800-900 resemble revenue.
In such a case you may create Text node in hierarchy called revenue and use it in report (if no hierarchy available from the source system) or create selection in the report.,

Similar Messages

  • Activating Account based Copa in the existing Cost-based COPA

    Hi Sap CO gurus!
    Please advise me for the following issue.
    Presently, My client using Cost-based COPA for segment wise reporting.( Already activated).
    Now they wanted the reports in Account Based. Is it possible to activate the Account based now? Will the system allow us to activate or not?
    If yes, What will be the implications? I want to know the pros and cons for that.
    If not, How Can I edit the COPA settings( Operating concern)? Or shall I delete the Operating concern and create one new one?
    Can you please explain the impact of each situation?
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Rama

    Hi Joe
    You can deactivate Account Based COPA, but you will have to do a thorough testing so that you are aware of the issues that can crop up
    The IMG Menu is SPRO > Controlling > Prof Analysis
    You will have to do a testing of how the open sales orders would behave... The open sales orders mean Sales Orders where PGI has been done, but billing is pending AS WELL AS Sales orders which are just created, but no Logistics movement (PGI) has taken place... You will have to do testing on both types of sales orders
      - When you do PGI after deactivating the account based COPA, you may face error. Because, COGS GL account is a cost element in Account based COPA, where as in Costing based COPA, it is usually not a Cost Element
      - Also do a billing from an open sales order and see if you get any error there...
    Similar issue can arise during variance settlement also, because the variance account is not a cost ele in Costing Based COPA.
    Test out the above scenarios and do share your experiences
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Reconciliation of  costing based COPA and account based COPA

    hi experts,
                 I want reconciliation statement of A/c based copa and costing based copa through SAP. we have not configured any account based copa reports. now we are manually doing the reconciliation. Please tell me the configuration.
    Thanks & regards
    jay

    HI
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting
    Regards,
    Vijayanand Sankaran

  • Differences between Costing based COPA and Account based COPA

    Hi,
    I wanted to know the main differences between Costing based COPA and Account based COPA?
    For which scenarios account based COPA used and for which scenarios costing based copa used.
    please guide me
    sateesh

    HI
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting
    Regards,
    Vijayanand Sankaran

  • Costing Based And Account based COPA - Need Assistance

    Hello All,
    In our project, with no other option we are planning to implement both costing based and account based COPA. I have been told that it is not recommended by SAP because for every entry there will two line items, one in cost based and another in account based (Correct me if I am wrong). But I could not understand why it is creating 2 line items in COPA. - Please help to understand this concept with an Example.
    Thanks
    PM

    Hi
    Costing based and account based COPA serve the same purpose...   analyze profitability of the product ....
    Costing based COPA should always be preferred over account based COPA, as it provides greater flexibility, some extra features, some extra planning mechanism and faster reports
    Following  are the point of differences between Costing based vs. Account based copa (ABC)
    1. Account based copa uses transaction tables (COEP, BSEG) and hence affects performance of CO transactions.CBC takes values from CE1XXXX to CE4XXXX tables. XXXX means Operating Concern name.
    2. Estimated / Statistical values not possible in ABC, say, calculating frieght upon invoice on a thumb rule basis to have better view of profitability per customer.. no valuation strategy in Accounts based COPA..
    3. Reports based on line items not possible in ABC.. possible in CBC.
    4 Actual Top Down distribution only available in CBC not in ABC .
    5. Revaluation of actual data to plan data is not available in ABC
    6. No key figure schemes are available in ABC
    7. In ABC, settlement cost elements are used to settle values to prof segments unlike value fields in CBC
    8. Production variance / COGS accounts shud be defined as cost element in ABC.
    System creates a document for each type of COPA as it stores values in different tables and what you can do with this data also differs like you can do TOP down in Costing Based Copa..
    Hence, you will have two COPA documents always......................
    Fot further clarifications .. please revert back..
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Account-based COPA and having Cost Center as Real Object in Sales Order

    Hi,
    We have recently activated account-based COPA and in our SO, we realized the Profitability Segment being populated- that is not a problem in normal scenarios.
    However, in some cases, we would like to charge to a cost center instead of COPA. We have tried the 2 ways mentioned in the forum/on the web to include Cost Center in Sales Order:
    1. Go to OVF3 t-code and configure a default cost center for the order reason
    2. Change the SD Document Category under 'Define Sales Document Types' to 'I- Order w/o charge'.
    However both ways only open the Cost center field but still populates the COPA. At accounting entries, cost center will become a statistical object and COPA, the real object- which is not what we want.
    Is there a way to stop the auto-populating of Profitabiltiy Segment in SO when cost center is being entered?
    Thanks very much in advance for any suggestions.
    Regards,
    Huimin

    Solved by myself, with help of OSS Note: 44381 - Profitability Segment Not Required in SD Postings. Have a CO substitution rule to clear away the Profitability Segment number based on certain conditions. Thanks!

  • Account Based COPA Cost of goods sold and Revenue Split

    Dear Experts,
    We are using account based copa in a automobile company.
    As per the requirement when a car is sold, depending on the customer request the car  goes for a conversion. like adding Radio, Seat cover, etc
    As per our setup we have different profit centers for vehicle and Parts(radio, seat cover etc) and in this case radio, seat cover, etc are the classes of the material vehicle(not separate material).
    After the vehicle conversion there is a sales order raised which goes to profit center derived from vehicle material master.
    As per the reporting requirement I need to spit the Cost of good sold  and revenue by vehicle profit center and parts profit center for COPA reporting purpose
    Is there any way to do this in standard SAP? Or I need an exit?
    Appreciate your response and please let me know in case of any clarification.
    Many thanks
    Roy
    Edited by: roy001 on Aug 4, 2011 4:52 PM

    For those who may need an answer to this, our solution was the following: 
    1)       Created new types for SO, SO Item, Sched. Line, Delivery, Delivery Item, Billing type  
    2)       Created new Pricing procedure
    3)       Created new movement type Y61/Y62 modeled after 601/602
    4)       Mapped Y61/Y62 to account modifier ZAX.
    5)       Mapped GBB/ZAX to the new account.
    Benefits, they now have better view of the orders going inter-company.  It is flexible enough to adjusting prices for intercompany separate from standard orders, even though for now it is a straight copy of cost.  They are able to remove the sales/use tax, from the calculations. They are able to plan with these orders separated out.  Plus, this will standardize their process for inter-company. 
    Hope this helps someone. 
    Cheers!
    Rick

  • Difference Between Cost and Account Based COPA

    Hi
    What is the difference between Cost and Account based COPA from a BI perspective ( both functionally and technically)
    Thanks
    Rashmi.

    Hi Rashmi,
    Greetings.
    There is lot of reading material available on forums and help.sap.com
    For start you can try with this:
    Link:[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7a/4c37ef4a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/content.htm]
    Thanks
    Sachin

  • Cost and account based copa

    hi,
    what is the difference for cost bases copa and account based copa?
    thanks

    In costing based COPA the values are captured at PGI where as in Account based copa teh values are captured at the time of Invoice.

  • What is the purpose of account based COPA when we have FSVs

    Hi,
    I noted the information we can get from account based copa is exactly the same as the information we can get from financial statement version reports. As such why do we need account based copa for?
    What info i can get in account based copa that i cannot get from FSV reports?
    help.sap.com

    Hi,
       Information gets passed to account based COPA if the relevant G/L account is a cost element.
       However account based COPA uses PA segments. This information contained in the PA segment can be viewed via KE24
       To test this post a billing document using account based COPA. After that go to KE24 for account based COPA and check the report. You will see all the details which would not be available in any FI report. Basically the information available for reporting makes it worth using for account based COPA
    regards
    Waman

  • KE24 - no line items in account-based COPA

    Hello,
    I am trying to configure Account-based COPA. I did all the configuration and create a report with a form assigned. The account I have posted is a revenue cost element and has profitability segment as an optional field and is updated with segment data.
    Since account-based COPA updates only COEP and CE4XXXX tables I am able to see the record being updated in these tables. But when I run KE24 and COPA report both of them yield no results.
    Please see attached for the detailed configuration and copa report set up.
    Note: I replicated the exact same scenario in another system with same config and also using the same accounts I was able to generate the KE24 and also COPA report. The only difference between these two systems being the database. System where COPA is working is on SQL DB and where it is not is on HANA DB.

    Pablo,
    My issue was because of HANA Database. So I had run a report called RKE_HDB_EXTEND_COEX which extends the COEP/COEJ tables into HDB. After running this the issue was resolved.
    Not sure if you have the same cause. Let me know.
    Thanks,
    Raj

  • Account based copa does not tie with GL

    Hello All,
    I have created a report in acccount based copa that shows me the balance of a GL account (XYZ). However, the balance only pertains to postings that have associated profitability segments entered (table CE4XXXX). However, the purpose of account based COPA is to tie FI GL accounts to COPA. Postings that do not have associated profitability segments do not appear in the profitability report, hence the balance of account in FBL3N and the copa report do not match up..this defeats the purpose of employing account based copa that permanently reconciles FI with COPA.
    Ofcourse, there are instances where a profitability segment is not required or cannot be generated but it should show up on the report in order for a user to see FI and COPA balances matching (COEP table is getting updated with the currency value even if a profitability segment is not generated).
    I need to see the total balance of the GL account in COPA divided in the following way:
    Sales                                                                                YYYY
    Cost of Good Sold (Cost element XYZ-assigned to Psg)                   YYYY
    Cost of Good Sold (Cost element XYZ-not assigned to Psg)              YYYY

    You should change your field status in FI to require the proper COPA segment when posting an FI document. In account based no postings should be made to COPA without it.
    pls assign points to say thanks.

  • Reconcile Accounts Based COPA with FI

    Dear Experts,
    My client needs material wise, customer wise, Sales Area-wise, region wise etc profitability report. The only way to achieve this is through COPA.I have confusion whether to go for Costing based COPA (CBC) or Accounts based COPA (ABC).
    I am afraid of CBC because reports from CBC do not automatically reconcile with FI and I will have a life long task of explaining the difference to management. I have seen clients scarpping CBC because at the end CBC works on calculated values which cannot inherently tally with FI and soon management stops trusting CBC. Moreover Gross Profit level figures for each characteristics can be obtained straight from LIS instead of going for CBC.
    I am sure that ABC will reconcile with FI. I presume that this will happen ONLY if field status group of all cost and revenue accounts have been configured to mandate posting to PSG. Else even ABC will not reconicle with FI. My question is If I mandate PSG for all cost/revenue posting then I fear that automatic postings coming from MM/HR will go into error.  How do we handle this and achieve ABC = FI.
    If anyone has come across ABC to FI reconcilation error/issues I would like take their guidance before I move forward.
    Regards
    Deepak Saxena

    Hi..!
    You can use either activate Costing Based CO PA nor  Accounting Based CO PA.
    1.Costing based CO-PA - it will be difficult to reconcile FI with CO PA as lot of time it will take to reconcile.
    For this you need to do assessment - settlements and direct postings from FI-MM-SD to CO PA thru PA transfer structure.
    You can find the Differences of FI -CO PA in KEAT t-code and based on the you can understand why it is showing difference (If any). This T-code will help you to reconcile.
    2.Accounting Based CO-PA  it is easy to reconcile and here the reconciliation happens between GL Account and Cost element level. So you wont get many issues while reconciling.
    In Costing based CO-PA you can draw a report at COGS Level where as you wont get it in Account Based CO-PA.
    Thanks,
    Anil

  • COS sales account in Account based COPA

    Hi,
    I am new to account based COPA and like to implement it in parallel to costing based COPA. I understand that COS or COGS account triggered during delivery has to be created as cost element.  What should be cost element category of  COS account ?
    Does it'll cause issue with existing costing based COPA ?
    Cheers,
    Anand

    Anand Agrawal,
    COS account should be of cost element category '1'.
    Cost-based COPA can be provide both cost-based reporting and account-based reporting. Since your existing is cost-based COPA, do not understand your question on any issue with existing cost-based COPA.

  • Account Based COPA problems

    Hi all,
    I activated the Account Based COPA, but why customer & product (which is the fixed characteristics from SAP) can not be taken during the report execution.
    Everytime I try to see a report with those characteristics it always come back as unassign field.
    Can anyone help me regarding this problems?
    Thanks.
    Lea

    Hi,
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
    You can also use both of these types of CO‑PA simultaneously.
    Hope this helps.
    Rgds
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for