Cost object Controlling - Transaction KKBC_HOE
Hello CO experts
Can anyone let me know or provide me the documentation for CO summarization report.
I defined hierarchy in the customization (SPRO) but it seems that it is not complete in all respects.
I always get "Hierarchy does not exist".
Thanks and Regards
Subbu
Hello Jayaraman,
It seems that you are just missing the data collection step ( summarisation step), which is a prerequisite, before executing the summarised analysis report KKBC_HOE.
Till the time , data is not collected in the defined hierarchy, we keep on getting the message as " Summarized object does not exist :"
The steps are
1. Define / Create summarisation hierarchy - KKR0 - I believe, you have already done this step.
2. Data Collection for the above summarisation - KKRC - for required hierarchy / subhierarchy / period - ( Menu path - Controlling - Product Cost Controlling - Cost Object Controlling - Product Cost by Period - Information System - Tools - Data Collection - KKRC - For Summarization Hierarchy )
Request to test this for a specific material / period / order type initially , to avoid long run times, and once satisfied / successful, collect the full data by executing the job in background.
3. Execute report KKBC_HOE
Hope this helps.
Please do not forget to award full points, if satisfied and successful.
Cheers
Shreekar Vaidya
Similar Messages
-
Difference between COPC planning and cost object controlling
I want to know why do we have to calculate the cost of a manufactured product by both COPC planning and Cost object controlling by order?
Will the cost of a manufactured product be different in COPC planning method and cost object controlling method?
if we use only cost object controlling to calculaute the cost of a manufactured product without using COPC planning wht will be the implications?Raja,
Yes the cost can be different. The cost calculating thorught Product Cost Planning may be static, you calculate it by period it is more for planning prupose ans to set standard. The cost calculated through Cost Object Controlling is resulting from your actual transactions, and the are few variables that could increase or decrease the cost of product. For example the overhead cost (Increase of salaries) can directly affect your activity rate at the work center and impact cost of your product when the production order is complete. You need both costs (Cost Planning and Cost Object releated) so at the end of the period you can calculate variance betweeen your plan cost and your actual costs.
Hope this clarifies your doubts.
GG -
Product cost planning & cost object controlling
Hi All
We are using KMAT material type for configurable materials.
Product cost planning:
My question is , Can we save cost estimate for the Kmat materials?
( I am assuming I dont have to run CK40N for these materails , As I am not going to have accounting tab for Kmat materails. and I do not know which materails and operations to use in super Bom and Super routing)
Please let me know If the above statement is true.
Cost object controlling:
Can i use cost obect controlling by production order or PCC?
*I am assuming I will be ale to use only cost object controlling by sales order....But I have nt worked on this previously...If I have to use cost object controlling by sales order , can you guys give me a link or steps that helps me in configuring Cost object controlling by sales order*Hi,
See comments in bold
Product cost planning:
My question is , Can we save cost estimate for the Kmat materials?
( I am assuming I dont have to run CK40N for these materails , As I am not going to have accounting tab for Kmat materails. and I do not know which materails and operations to use in super Bom and Super routing)
Please let me know If the above statement is true.
You have goto VA02-->Costing
Sales order costing is big topic,please check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/90/ba6da4446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
Cost object controlling:
Can i use cost obect controlling by production order or PCC?
*I am assuming I will be ale to use only cost object controlling by sales order....But I have nt worked on this previously...If I have to use cost object controlling by sales order , can you guys give me a link or steps that helps me in configuring Cost object controlling by sales order*
Sales order costing is big topic,please check this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_01/helpdata/en/90/ba6f9f446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Thanks,
Rau -
0CO_PC_01 Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data
Hi Experts
I have a question regarding Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data (0CO_PC_01). I know nothing about the R/3 processes and tcodes behind this datasource.
For a given material and a given plant do I only get records with VTYPE(Value type for Reporting) 10, but I do not understand why - I need VTYPE = 70.
I therefore hope:
1. That somebody could provides input on why I only get VTYPE = 10 and how I get 70 instead.
2. That somebody can tell me the tcodes behind this datasource on the R/3 side.
Thanks and kind regards,
TorbenHi Mr. V.
Thanks a lot for the input.
The problem is that we have got VTYPE 30 (target) for some materials, but not for specific material A and we really do not understand why. Do you know how I can verify if the variance is present for the given material A in R/3?
Thanks and kind regards,
Torben
Edited by: Torben Pedersen on Apr 3, 2009 12:00 AM
Sorry, it is VTYPE 30 i need, not 70 as stated by mistake at first. -
PDF Document for cost object controlling
Hi Sap Gurus ,
please any body sent cost object controling pdf document to me.please help me .
Thanks & Regards
SriHI
Below links has some details relating to PC-COC
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/COPCIS/COPCIS.pdf
VVR -
can any one tell me what is valuated sales order, and non valuated sales order?
and when we use these two scenarios?
thank you,
shankar chitupoluValuated sales order, and Un-Valuated sales order, these two will occur in Sales order related production scenarios, and when we use "Product cost by Sales order" in cost object controlling.
We use Product cost by Sales order:
If we want to know profit margin for particular sales order,
to track special sales costs,
to know funds committed to the sales order,
to know performance of sales order in costing point of view and
to get affects of delay in delivery.
This allows us to use Results Analysis.
In Valuated sales order:
Quantity and Value flow is combined,
Assembly costs can be seen at multilevel make to order production,
Inventory determination is simple,
It is similar to MTS Production,
enables more CO scenarios and logical decoupling of Co-PC and PP.
In Un-Valuated Sales order:
Quantity flow is separate from Value flow,
Costs are not posted immediately to sales order,
No variance for assigned production orders,
not good for Multilevel production process.
I hope U Got it... -
Activity confirmation at target quantity in Cost object Controlling
How can I confirm activity usage by back flushing target quantities based on actual quantity delivered into stock from a process order?
Could you please advise how we can do the above?
Currently we are confirming the activity based on the planned hrs. But how could it be possible in SAP to Confirm the activity usage based on the delivered stock from a process order
The above is only relevant to Activity but not component materials.
Thank youHi Ravikanth,
To post activity quantities by back flush for the actual quantities confirmed, please take a look at the following:
1. In routing (Master Receipe), you can make settings that at each of the operations, you can back flush the activities. It is controlled at Routing. you can check in the routing there will be a check box for backflushing. If need more details in this regard, you may also check with your PP guy.
2. At the time of confirmation, system will propose the activity quantities based on the back flush, but here if you don't want to change anything, you can simply post it. Else if you want to change the quantities, system will allow you the change.
The process and system behaviour would be same for both By Production Order or By Process Order. Only the difference is you will have Master receipe in Process Order instead of Production Order and there is some added features like PI sheet for better quality management.
Please let me know if you need futher details in this regard
Surya -
Reg:Cost Object Controlling
Hi All,
While am doing the T.Code: MFBF - REM Backflush (For Repetative Manufactring) the following Issue is coming
E:M7:226 131 _ _ _ F
Message no. M7226Hi Suryanarayana,
Please Do me the favour, no MM guy is available right know
see the following movement types i assigned on REM Profile
Movement Types
Goods issue 261 Goods issue/reversal 262
Goods receipt 131 Goods receipt/reversal 132
Scrap 551 Scrap/reversal 552
By-product 531 By-product/reversal 532
Additional movement types relevant fot make-to-order scenrio
GR Individual SOrd 571 GR Indiv. Order Reversal 572
GI Ind. Stock/SOrd 572 GI SO Stock/Sorder/Canc. 571
GI PlntStock/SOrd 291 GI Pl. Stock/SOrder Rev. 292 -
Error in Distribution of Actual cost in Cost Object Hierarchy
Hi,
I am getting an error while doing the Distribution of Actual cost from Cost Object Node to the assigned Order.
Cost element/origin 630000 could not be distributed
Message no. KZ468
Diagnosis
The cost element/ origin 630000 could not be distributed because there are no target costs for this cost element/origin or for cost element group CO-PC-TOT.
Procedure
Check the calculated target costs and cost element group CO-PC-TOT assigned to the target cost version.
Procedure for System Administration
Proceed
Although the Cost element is Present in cost element group CO-PC-TOT.
One more information, the order that is assigned in Cost Object Hierarchy is of CO-Product orders.
I have searched in the forum but I havent got any solution.
Kindly help.
regards
KamiHi,
Concerning error message KZ 468, it has the following origin: In the customizing of the cost object category (transaction okz5), check if the 'single object selection' is set to 'Control through variance key'. If you consider the F1-Help for this option you will find the following explanation:
if the indicator Control through variance key is turned on, the production order, process order, or product cost collector can only be assigned to the cost object hierarchy if:
-> The material is assigned to the lowest node of the hierarchy
-> No variance key is specified in the order
The important point is, that orders that have a variance key are excluded from the cost distribution.
In transaction KKF8 you will find that all these orders do indeed have a variance key. Hence, all of these orders are included, there are no target costs from the orders and the costs cannot be distributed. Thus the error message kz 468.
Please consider that and check the customizing again.
Not having target costs in the distribution indicates either a wrong set up of the hierarchy or, more likely, no valid cost estimate for a certain material of a production order or product cost collector could be found.
Did you check whether for this cost element/origin target costs exist, and also for the cost element group? If not the message KZ468 is correct and probably the cost element group has to be maintained properly.
The distribution of actual costs calculates target costs on-the-fly and the variance calculation does not have to be carried out before. Quite the opposite than the variance calculation requires the distribution as a preceding step. Furthermore it is not sufficient that one cost element is in a cost element group but the interval where the cost element has been assigned to has to have some target costs. Otherwise this won't work and message KZ468 is issued.
regards
Waman -
Distribution of Price difference value to Other Cost Objects in Hierarchy
Hi,
I have a unique scenario for one of my client.
Here we are using Cost Object Hierarchy for Cost Object Controlling. We have Two COH for Billets and Wire Rods.
The Input for Billets production are Raw Materials and Input for Wire Rod Production are the Billets.
Each Billet grade is consumed for the Specific Wire Rod Grade.
At the end of the Month we do the settlement and we get the Price difference value of the Billets. We can also know the Per unit Price difference value.
Now we want to send this Price difference per unit value of the Billets to the Wire Rod Production orders according to the quanity of Billets consumed.
We are not using ML.
I am not getting any idea how to Proceed for thsi scenario.
Any suggestion please.
Regards
KamiHi
W/o ML, you cant achieve this...
if your Prod process is farily stable and qty variances are not much i.e. the only major reason for variances are the prices - Then you can adopt this workaround
Re: sfg and FG @ MAP
br, Ajay M -
Which Cost Objects to hit in Controlling
Dear All,
Please guide which cost centres/ cost Objects should be chosen in case of the following entries in FI
a) Revaluation of Inventroy based on Standard Costs ( Entry passed by system at beginning of the month)
Inventory Ac Dr
Finished Goods Valuation Adjustement Ac Cr
Semi Finished Goods Valuation Adjustment Ac Cr
Presently entry passed due to above price change we are accounting under Procurement cost centre and treating the same as period costs. Is this treatment proper?
b) Scrap generated during production is not possible to allocate the same to any specific production Order , hence the scrap loss entry as mentioned below is accounted under production cost centre
Scrap Loss Ac Dr
Inventory Semi Finished Ac Cr
inventory Raw Material Ac Cr
Whether scrap loss should be accounted under production cost centre or there any better way of accounting scrap loss in controlling ?
Please provide answers so that necessary configuration chages can be made.
Regards
Milind NairHi
Material reveluation (ie cost element) will be posted with cost center as cost object and Profit center will be geting profit center assignment with plant combination
Scrap should be treated as by product wich in return give credit to production order or product cost collector
Dinabandhu -
The performance of Distribution of Cost Object Hierarchy Costs.
Dear SAP Gurus.
I am checking the function and the performance about Cost Object Hierarchies distribution with Control Through Variance Key.
The number of production orders assigned to COH is about 100,000 per month.
All orders will be closed at current month and new 100,000 production order will be assigned to COH at next month.
My concern is about performance of Distribution of Cost Object Hierarchy Costs
because a huge number of orders will be accumulatedly assigned to the Cost Object Hierarchies.
I think that the COH will be distributed with not bad performance.
(Actually I want that to be OK.)
What's your opinion about that?
Sincerely.
Mahnkwi.Hi Mahnkwi,
Sender-/receiver-relations should definitely be below 1:1000 or even below 1:500. This depends on other factors like general size of the hierarchy and data to be processed as well. This hierarchy needs to be restructured. In case you do this the
distribution needs to be reversed first.
Below are some other hints on performance in KKPX
- Parallel processing should be used.(note [386508|https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0000386508])
- Switch off detail lists since the consume lots of memory.
- Old orders should be archived.
Note [77718|https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0000077718] also explains tips to avoid the memory error for transaction KKPX or KKPY. As note explains, you should consider
whether a distribution of the cost elements according to their origin is required; if not, the corresponding indicator should not be set in the costing view of the materials.
If many error message is issued in the error log, this may have bad effect on the memory of your server. In this case, you should make these error message "not to be displayed" by message control in IMG.
Regards,
Declan -
Error while doing MR11 as enter Profitability segmet as Cost object
Hi All,
While doing MR11, we noticed a error message (ZC - 001) as "Enter Profitability segment as Cost object for Revenue and COGS posting".
The specified Material account is created as Cost element (CE Category 11) and in OKB9 configuration this cost element is choosed (ticked) with the option "profitability segment". Also there is no substitution rule to derive profitability segment in OBBH substitutions.
However there is a validation (GGB0), where the above specified Material account is included in the range of accounts in the Prerequisite, and Check as "Profitability segment is > (greater than) 0000000001 and with the message maintained as "Enter Profitability segment as Cost object for Revenue and COGS posting".
Can any please help why this error has come at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards
KarunHi Eli,
Thank you very much for reply.
I hope the note 184987 is not applicable in our case as the Field status of specified Material account does not have required entry for Profitability segment.
Can you please let me know if we have entry in OKB9 and existance of entry in Validation creates the problem and throws the above error message?
With regard to other note 134484 which you have specified on "error in Account assignment check in MM transactions" says "A detailed default account assignment (for example profitability segment) was defined in Transaction OKB9. However, the profitability segment is not set up correctly for goods movements: the characteristics material, plant, business area are missing. A later check of the profitability segments against material, plant and business area then generates an error message since the profitability segment is inconsistent".
Is there any way to confirm whether this situation is leading to our error before implementing this note.
Thanks & Regards
Karun -
Cost of Goods Sold - Cost Element asking Cost Object
Dear All,
We have defined a G/L account :500000 (Cost of Goods Sold - Field Status Group:G030).
Normally we should not create it as a cost element,but when CRM consultant does a transaction ,system asks that GL account :500000 not created as a cost element,Hence that time I have created as a cost element.
Now every time ,system is asking for cost object for this cost element.
As you all know that ,we can maintain in OKB9,but in our scenario,we have more than 3500 Cost Centers,which is not possible.
Can anybody share as how to resolve this issue?
Regards
SubbuThanks Mr Ajay for understanding my question.
As I told mentioned in my initial question that I have created the GL:500000 (COGS) when CRM/SD issues the stock for delivery.
What my FI done is that the same GL (500000) is assigned both in GBB-VAX and GBB-VAY as per the client requirement.
Now suggest me as how to come out from this situation?
If I need to do Validation ,request you to give your guidance as how to do it as I never done.
Thnaks in advance.
Su -
Cost object for Revenue Item?
Dear friends
When I am posting sales entry in F-02, system is asking Cost Object.
I have given Cost Center as a Cost Object. In the control tab I have removed lock for Actual Revenues also.
Even after this also system is asking the Cost Object. And I am getting the below error:
Account 301001 requires an assignment to a CO object
"Message no. KI248
Diagnosis
All given account assignment objects (order, project) are defined as statistical.
System Response
Statistical orders or projects are ignored when FI and CO are reconciled. You must enter a cost center, order, project, or cost object to which the costs are posted for CO postings.
Procedure
Enter a cost center, an order, a project, or a cost object that is not statistical. The posting row affected is 002 and the account is 301001."
Regards
Kiran ARevenues posted to cost center always statistical postings only. System is looking for real cost object. Go to profit segment field and derive manually to post to profit segment. Otherwise you need a Internal Order or Sales order
Maybe you are looking for
-
Order status is still saying processing items
I ordered my IPad 3 on the 16th of March, so it was after the pre-order thing and I was going to just buy it straight away from a apple store but dicided to order online with engraving and the apple smart cover. Both the items are still saying "proce
-
To get the comments of Verifier in PR05
Hi Experts, In the t-code PR05(Travel Expense Manager), in the comments tab, the verifier is able to enter his comments. This is basically a text box where the verifier enters his comments for approval. It is a free text as such.This data is not save
-
Can any one help since I have updated my iPad 3 and iPhone 4S I know suffer with it loosing wifi and dropping only since I went to 6.0.1 I now find my self with two things that never now connect for more than a few minutes then I spend the next 10 t
-
Why can't I scroll down after accidently turning on voiceover?
After I had Voiceover on my triple-home click selection choices, I accidently turned it on. Now I can't scroll down to accesibility to turn it off, and I was stupid enough to take it off the triple-home click. Can anybody help short of reseting it?
-
Error:No Jco RFc metadata found
Hi Moderator, Pls don't block this question ,previously also ,I have closed the questionin another forum but you blocked here. Closed the questionin another forum as I think that this is appropriate forum. ============================================