Cost of inheritance

what is the cost of inheritance means?

srikanth_cool wrote:
what is the cost of inheritance means?Many countries have a form of inheritance, death or estate taxes.
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inheritance_tax]
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

Cost Center Inheritance from Org Unit

Good day all,
Can someone please advise regarding cost center inheritance from org units?
I understand the inheritance concept, however simple need to know if the CCenter is added to the org unit via A011 relationship, does the system physically create a A011 relationship on the position inhertiting the cost center from the org or does the system simply pick up the realtionship from the org unit relationsip for use in IT0001 field KOSTL (cost center)?
Thanks guys, have a lovely day!
Christy

Hi Christy,
As we know cost centre(K) is an unusual object in OM.Two type of objects internal whose master record are in database table beloging to sap erp hcm and eexternal object whose master data belong to other application areas.Cost centre is an external object that is used to represent origin of costs.Inheritance concept is on the basis of whoch cost centre are assigned in org plan.
directly related cost centre is called master cost centre and they are made via A011 cost centre assignment relationsip.they can be made at org unit,position or work centre and nornmally its org unit that common.Org unit at the top are asisgned the cost centre as a best practise so that all the org units below or reporting will inherit the same.
Similarly multiple cost centre assignments can also e made through 1018 infotype(cost centre distribution).Inheritance also applied to them aswell.
Hope this helps.
No Worries
KG

Cost Center Inheritance

Is there a option to de-activate the Inheritance functionality of the Cost Centers in OM.
I have already de-activated the Account assignment switch.Still the Cost Center that is assigned to the reporting Org Unit is being inherited by the subordinate Org Units/Positions.I want this inheritance to be stopped.
Is there a specific switch that controls the cost center inheritance?

deactive PLOGI ORGA t77s0

Cost Centres inherited from the Org.

Hello Experts,
Please help.
I Have to pull a report asap that lists all org units with their cost centres and cost distributions and I have to indicate where the cost centre / cost distribution was inherited from another org. I also have to show which org the cost centre / cost distribution was inherited from.
What is the best way to pull this data?
Thanks in advance for your help.
regards,
Jeanette

S_AHR_61016528 with evaluaton path OMACC_D works to show the account assignment and the inheritance however it doesn't show the cost distribution. Is there another evaluation path I can use to get the cost distribution and it's inheritance?
Thanks again.

Report to retreive cost centers of positions (including inherited CC)

Hello,
I need to create a report to display the cost center linked to a position (relationship A011) or the cost center inherited from the organizational unit of the position. I've looked into the SDN forums, in the standard reports and I made some tests with a ad-hoc query using the PCH log. db but without luck so far.
Can someone give me some hints on how I can proceed ?
Best,
Julien

Hi
I have a business scenario
user wants to capture the marketing cost using IO and COPA
Ex:
For marketing purpose user buy 100 shirts and create PO which trigger IO and while creating IO itself the qty and cost should be updated in COPA (user using both costing and account based copa)
and while distributing the shilts to the team the same will be reduced from IO which should also reflect in COPA
Can you please suggest any solution.
Thanks,

Changing personnel area/subarea (IT1008) from org unit to position

We are live with PA and Org. Mgmt, but have been advised to change the infotype 1008 data - personnel area and subarea to be stored on the position instead of the org unit (where we have it now). A big reason for this is we have cases when we need to overwrite the personnel subarea at the position level. For example, a position belonging to an org unit with subarea ABCD, may really be in subarea WXYZ. Therefore, even though the org unit is ABCD, it will be overwritten at the position level to WXYZ. My understanding is that the RHINTE30 program will not work approrpiately if we are maintaining the data this way.
In transaction PPOME there is an account assignment tab on the org unit with cost center (filled in) and personnel area/subarea (which will be blank moving forward since that data won't be maintained on the org unit). Then, there is also an account assignment tab on the position with cost center inherited from the org unit (sometimes needing to be overwritten at the position level), and the personnel area/subarea data. My question is how should I handle the view of PPOME for this data? Can I hide the personnel area and subarea on the account assignment tab for the org units only so it is not confusing for the users? The problem with having it this way is that personnel area and subarea are blank on the org unit and filled on on the position. They are conflicting and both visable/maintainable to the User. Any advise please? Thanks!

Hi Nish,
I gave you my input on your other related message and now will go for this one.
As I commented on the other message, RHINTE30 will not integrate infotypes 1008 and 1013. So you don't have to worry about using this functionality (first part of your message).
On the second part (personnel area / subarea on position rather than org unit): there are some considerations here that are more functional / process driven than technical. From a technical point of view, everything can be done. You can hide data from infotype 1008 on the tabstrip for your org. unit using dynpro handling, even via customizing. You can even transfer the data from infotype 1008 on the org. units to the positions or delimit it on the org units. There are some quite easy ways of achieving this using the LMSW tool (have you used it? I can forward some documentation).
But personally, I would not recommend to do this from a process point of view. Everything in SAP HR is about the inheritance concept, and I think this works very well when it comes to org. units and positions. It is normally advisable to record personnel area / subarea on the org. unit level. This will be inherited by positions (even if you cannot see it at position level in PPOME) and thus defaulted for the employee. At position level you should handle only the exceptions, which will be in turn also defaulted for the employee holding the position. In this way, data maintenance is minimized. If you delete (or do not use from now on) information about infotype 1008 on org. unit level, your HR department will have to maintain this every time a position is created, and even in cases in which a position is shifted from one org. unit to another one.
In my opinion, you should address this with your HR department and explain the concept and the consequences of maintaining all at position level. It would only be advisable to do it if the org. unit structure is very cross-personnel areas and subareas. If it is a matter of handling exceptions, again, I would recommend to continue recording this data at org. unit level. All in all, if the data is not recorded on the position and you need to see which is its personnel area, you just need to double-click on the org. unit above.
Just wanted to let you know my opinion, of course it's your decision. By the way, I'm of course not aware of other possible implications like home-developed reporting and so on.
Regards,
Rodrigo

Controlling area already used for org. unit problem

Hi people,
can you please help me with one problem, my customer is upgrading SAP HR from 4.6 to 6.0 and now we are testing QAS system.
When I create new or. unit in PPOME, I have Cost-centre inherited from the org.unit above, but when I want to put another Cost-centre it gives me the next error "Controlling area HR01 already used for organizational unit XXXXXXXX".
The same procedure worksin PRD system which is on version 4. 6. Could you please help me what is wrong because i am not able to change cost centre in the QAS system.
Thank you.
Romano
Edited by: Romano Cinotti on Oct 13, 2009 11:25 AM

Hi,
To which object u are going to change the cost center i.e, position, job, org.unit.
If you are changing the cost center to position, If it is not allowing to change the cost center then u have to check the parameters:
May be u already assigned cost center
May be u already assigned cost center to ur org, unit, which u assigned to ur position. If u already assigned diffrent cost center to ur org.unit, you may not change the cost center to ur position or job.
Regards
Devi.

Org Unit inheritance link to Parent Cost Center - is this Config?

Hi
We started at a new client and have difficulty maintaining the Org Structure A 011 relationships to child Org Units. The system undoes our implicit links. We want the implicit links to be there and not inherited. Is it possible to switch off the inheritance in config?
Please assist/advise.
Thank you, Adrian

what do you mean when you say the system 'undoes' your implicit links? Did you mean the system undoes the inherited cc value by using the explicit cc-assignment done at an org unit level? if yes that is how sap works,... the options are
a. do not do explicit creation of cost center to org unit . that way assigning a cost center at the top org unit will suffice as that will be inherited to all org units down the structure. But this is not a workable business scenario at all.
b. determine the explicit cost center assignments at each org unit level and do the assignment accordingly.
lastly : I dont think inheritence of cost center is something you can deactivate in img.
cheers

How to find cost centers for a org unit ( if kost center is inherited)

Hi all
We have a org structure
When a parent org unit is assigned a kost center then the parent also inherites the kost center
I need to find kost center for all the org unit in my organization
I cant see the inherited cost center neither in IT 1001 nor 1008 nor 1015 but i can see it in PPOME in the account assignment tab.
How can i find the inherited cost centers to all the org units.
i think i am clear with my requirement to all
Thanks
Raj

Use the report RHSTRU00 in tcode SE38
and give the follwoing values in selection screen
Plan version                    01 Current plan
Object type                     O   Organizational unit
Evaluation Path               A011       All relationships to A011 -> cost
execute the report to see all the orgunits with their cost centers

Business Area is not inheriting from Org.Unit or Cost Centre

Hi
Business area is assigned to Org.unit in IT1008, when I executing the action business area is not defaulting / Inheriting from Org.Management.
Any one could help me to solve this issue.
Thank you.
Bachi

It seems OM and PA are not integrated, are they?
RHINTE20 is the report can bring data from OM to PA.

Issue in updating Cost Centers for Employees

Hi All,
1.     Is it necessary that infotype 0000 & 0001 needs to be in synchronization i.e. both the infotypes should contain same no. of records?
2.     Is it necessary to assign cost center to both the position and the employee in infotype 0027 for Payroll purpose or either of one assignment is sufficient? What is the purpose of assigning cost center to a position & cost center to an employee in infotype 0027
3.     We have assigned cost centers to positions & all the employees via infotype 0027. Now I have a situation that the company has created new cost centers as per their business line with effect from Jan 2011. How do I update these new cost centers to position as well as all the employees?
If I assign new cost center to all the positions thru PO13 from 01.01.2011 than system delimits the record in infotype 0001 so now there is 1 record in infotype 0000 & 2 records in infotype 0001. For example an employee is hired on 01.03.2009 with cost center A assigned to his position & in infotype 0027. Now if I assign new cost center B to his position than the system delimits hiring record in infotype 0001. So now there are 2 records in infotype 0001 i.e. 01.03.2009 to 31.12.2010 & second is 01.01.2011 to 31.12.9999. If I do the assignment of new cost centers only in infotype 0027 then system posts the payroll result to old cost center rather than new cost centers. How to resolve this issue?
Regards,
VG

1. Yes. It should be. But in your case this is an exception. It will still work even if the 0000 and 0001 don't have the same number of records.
2. You should only use it0027 if an employee is charging costs to two or more cost centers. You can define here the cost centers where they are charging and the percentage of division between cost centers
If you dont have scenarios like this, DO NOT use this infotype.
For assignment of cost centers to employee (Infotype 1) or to positions (via PO13). You should only use one method. If you are assigning the cost center manually in IT0001 during hiring then you don't need to enter the cost center in the positions.
If you are entering the cost center in the Positions objects, then configure the system so that everytime you do hiring actions (or maintain infotype 1) the cost center assigned to the position is inherited in the infotype 1's cost center field.
Don't assign it to both Infotype 1 manually and the position at the same time, using this method, you'll eventually have data inconsistencies.
For you issue regarding the delimitation of the IT0001, this is ok. This is standard, the infotype 1 is delimited since you have a new cost center assignment for the succeeding period. You don't have to create an Action record since there was no employee movement, only change in cost center assignment. (which is the purpose of the Action infotype-- to record employee movement)
It won't mess with your payroll, your infotype 1 just have an extra record.

Having an inherited function return the derived type instead of the base type

I am writing two classes in C#:
A Matrix class
that represents a general Matrix with n-by-m dimensions
A SquareMatrix class
that inherits from Matrix and
has the constraint of being n-by-n
The reason I designed it this way is because square matrices support additional specific operations like calculating the determinant or the inverse, so being able to guarantee that those functions are avaliable with the specific type you're using are nice things
to have. Additionally it would support all the regular Matrix operations and can be used as a Matrix
I have a function in Matrix called getTranspose().
It calculates the transpose of the Matrix and returns it as a new Matrix
I inherited it in SquareMatrix,
but because the transpose of a square matrix is guaranteed to be square matrix, I also want it to return a SquareMatrix
I am unsure about the best way to do this.
I can re-implement the function in SquareMatrix,
but that would be code duplication because it's essentially the same calculation
I can use implicit typecast operators, but if I understand correctly that would cause unnecessary allocations (upcast SquareMatrix to Matrix,
create a new Matrix as
the transpose, create a new SquareMatrix during
typecasting and throw away the tranposed Matrix)
I can use explicit typecast operators, but it would be stupid to have to typecast the transpose of a SquareMatrix explicitly,
and it also has the same problem of the implicit operator with unnecessary allocations
Is there another option? Should I change the design of having SquareMatrix inherit
from Matrix?
This problem also applies to operators. It seems that I have to either implement typecasting operators which might cost in performance, or have to re-implement the same code.

Inheritance not helping to eliminate repetition and typecasts is often a sign that generics would help. You can do something like:
public T getTranspose<T>()
// or non-member function
T getTranspose<T>(T input)
I haven't fully worked it out, but it seems it might get awkward on the calling side. I know C# does some inference with generic methods, but I don't know C#, so I'm not familiar with the details. That might be the way you have to go, though, if you want
full compile-time type checking with the least amount of repetition in the implementation.
Another option would be to create private helper functions, then pass in the result type you want, for the helper to populate, like:
public SquareMatrix getTranspose() {
SquareMatrix result = new SquareMatrix();
transposeHelper(result);
return result;
This gives you more boilerplate on the implementation side, but at least it isn't full repetition.
A third option is just to check if the result is square in the Matrix implementation, and return a
SquareMatrix if it is, like:
public Matrix getTranspose() {
Matrix result;
if (resultIsSquare())
result = new SquareMatrix();
else
result = new Matrix();
// calculate result
return result;
This has the advantage of not needing any implementation at all for getTranspose() in
SquareMatrix, but at the expense of requiring type checking of the return value at the call site. It also works for cases like multiplying two non-square matrices that happen to give a square result. You give up most compile-time type checking,
though.
If your application happens to mostly require run-time instead of compile-time type checking anyway, you might as well just give up the different types and throw an exception if you call a method that a non-square matrix doesn't support. I believe this is
the approach most existing libraries take, especially since there are other conditions than being non-square that can cause methods like
inverse() to fail.
Speaking of libraries, there are a lot of good ones out there for matrix math, that are already heavily tested and optimized. Don't reinvent the wheel if you don't have to.

Inheritance - Cannot find Symbol

Hello!
After many hours of searching for the answer, i have decided to brave getting a grilling for asking something trivial.
I'm creatating a system and so far the problem i am having is inheritance.
The superclass compiles fine, no problems:
package Boats;
public abstract class Boat
     protected String name;
     protected int price;
     protected int id;
     protected String type;
     protected boolean hire;
     public boat(int boatID, String boatName, int cost, String boatType)
        name = boatName;
          price = cost;
          id = boatID;
          type = boatType;
        hire = false;
}however, the subclass of pedal boat won't compile:
package Boats;
public abstract class PedalBoat extends Boat
     private String colour;
    public PedalBoat(int id, String boatName, int cost, String boatType, String c)
        super(id, boatName, cost, boatType);
          colour = c;
        super.hire = false;
}both of these class files are in the same folder 'Boats', but when i compile PedalBoat, the following message is displayed:
"PedalBoat.java:2: cannot find symbol
symbol: class Boat
public abstract class PedalBoat extends Boat
^
Any thoughts or help or links to anywhere that has answered this before?
Thanks!

You'll want the following directory structure. The C:\projects part is arbitrary. It's what comes after it that matters.
C:\projects\Boats\Boat.java
C:\projects\Boats\PedalBoat.javaThen, CD to C:\projects, and execute
javac -cp . Boats/*.javaAs a side note, to go with the flow convention-wise, I'd suggest renaming your Boats package to boats. Package names are conventionally all lowercase.
[Javapedia: Classpath|http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Javapedia/ClassPath]
[How Classes are Found|http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/findingclasses.html]
[Setting the class path (Windows)|http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/windows/classpath.html]
[Setting the class path (Solaris/Linux)|http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/solaris/classpath.html]
[Understanding the Java ClassLoader|http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/j-dw-javaclass-i.html]
java -cp .;<any other directories or jars> YourClassNameYou get a NoClassDefFoundError message because the JVM (Java Virtual Machine) can't find your class. The way to remedy this is to ensure that your class is included in the classpath. The example assumes that you are in the same directory as the class you're trying to run.
javac -classpath .;<any additional jar files or directories> YourClassName.javaYou get a "cannot resolve symbol" message because the compiler can't find your class. The way to remedy this is to ensure that your class is included in the classpath. The example assumes that you are in the same directory as the class you're trying to run.

Inherited first gen Macbook Pro

Hey everyone, I have a somewhat vague question. I recently swapped computers with my wife, inheriting her first generation Macbook Pro, which has surprisingly withstood the test of time. Right now I'm trying to maximize the performance so that I can make it through to the next product cycle. It can handle basic tasks. Ideally, I would like to be able to run multiple programs (Powerpoint/Keynote, large PDFs, Chrome, Word), but the computer tends to lag down. The specs are in my signature; the hard drive is about 90% full (93 gb capacity), not sure the RPM. Activity monitor typically shows >1 gb of RAM free.
Would you recommend running any diagnostics, new software or hardware? Is there a cost effective way of installing SSD, or am I better off waiting for prices to go down? My goal is to become more Mac savvy and autonomous, so if you can point me towards any good (ideally free) resources, I'd be very appreciative!
Thanks, and happy New Year.

Welcome from me too!
Definitely replace the hard drive with a bigger one--100 GB is just not big enough, and besides, it's likely getting to the end of its useful life as it must be 5 years old now. You can likely look up the specs on the manufacturer's web site using the serial number.
You could try running SMART Utility:
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/systemdiskutilities/smartutility.html
You can download the demo and run it several times for free. It is somewhat more critical than Disk Utility, and may pick up impending hard drive failure sooner.
You can use any SATA drive that is no more than 9.5 mm tall, which means you cannot use any of the 1 TB drives that are 12.5 mm tall. There are many 500 GB drives around, including a hybrid from Seagate which is supposed to be very fast. There are even some 750 GB drives around that are 9.5 mm tall.
If the old drive has your wife's stuff on it, you can just put it in an enclosure and give it back to her. Then you can set up the new drive with your stuff. You might check on OWC's web site--they have drive kits, which includes an enclosure for the old drive. Also check with Newegg and Tiger Direct, as they often have specials on drives.
There's even one on theSeagate hybrid:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148591
Western Digital's Scorpio Black is also an excellent drive, and not nearly as expensive:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136692
It seems to be sold out, but I'm sure they will get more in.
Do you want to install the drive yourself? Check out ifixit for step by step directions. If you don't, your local AASP can do it for you.
There is a ton of free resources on the Apple site, including many video tutorials for new Mac users. ifixit and powerbook medic are also free resources if you want to work on your Mac yourself, with lots of step-by-step instructions.
Good luck, and happy New Year to you too!

Cost allocation flexfield

hi
after reading payroll UG, i am a bit confused about cost allocation flexfield for payroll, assignment, element link, org,element entry.
can i consider this flexfield as a T ledger, the first popup field is for Debit, the second one is for Credit purposes, when they are used for those 5 sections?

the payroll - org - element entry - assignment - element link are levels at which you can define to show a segment or not.
In case a segment is specified at a higher level, it is inherited from the other levels, so an end user has not to enter all the data all over again. (like a waterfall)
The most detailed level is the element entry level. Imagine if the end user must enter there for each segment and for each segment all values. Too much work and too error prone.
So you can set values for a specific segment at a specific level (example company code at payroll level).
Costing then rolls up all levels to fully qualify all the segments.

Cost of inheritance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for