CostCenter Group Aggregation problem. High Priority Issue.

Hi Experts,
I have very crital issue in the report, Help needed.
   I had some kind of requirement in one of the Overhead cost report, need to combine the COPA data and Costcenter(Over Head cost) data. I have a problem with Costcenter Group aggregation on the report.
I have Restricted 2-Keyfigures want to derive the 3rd Keyfigure values. I given the below exmaple of the data. In my report I just want to display the KeyFigure(KF-A,B,C). I dont want to Display the Cost Center group/Costcenter Number in my report. My report ouput will be one line. But If I removed the costcenter Group I am seeing different values of the Keyfigure C, If I display the Costcenter comng with differnt Values. I am expecting the values in the column C is 1400 but it is coming like 3600.
Please guide me how to design the Keyfigures if I want to get the value 1400 in theKeyFigre C with out Showing the Costcenter In the report.
Cost-Center Group R00048
                  Costcenter     KF-A     KF-B           KF-C
     10113     10     10          100
     10114     20     20          400
     10115     30     30          900
          60     60          1400(Insted of this its comming like 3600)
Appreciate the response.
Thanks,
Venkata

Hi,
Check the display properties of key figure in Query Designer/Info object level.
Set the property accordingly.
I hope it will help.
Thanks,
S

Similar Messages

High priority issue

Hi,
I have configured the workflow mailer but iam unable to receive the mails and also the workflow notification mailer has stopped with error
The Workflow Document Web Services Service,Workflow Mailer Service
The Workflow Agent Listener Service, remains to be started and thier services are activated
When i start the workflow notification mailer i got the error as
An error has occured
"The service Component Container is nor running".Please say me how to solve the error

Pl see your duplicate post here - workflow mailer
Srini

High priority bug to be solved very urgent

Hello Experts,
I need your help and plz close this topic once its solved.
Here is the problem:
There is report called "Material Group".When its is displayed for material gorup say "GB06010000" is displayed as part of report data wheras the source system (oracle ) does not have this item any more in the catalog. This indicated that data is not refreshed for quite a long time.
This report is connected to the third party application (oracle db) not EBP system(r/3). Time to time there has been deletion or addition catalog items and in all as of today there are 815 items, whereas BIW report displays 4204 items. How can i refresh this data to display 815 items.
how to solve this issue any ideas or suggestion????
the reports is on ODS level.
I hope all of u take this problem as urs and try to give me solution as earliest possible.
<b>this is high priority issue from client side</b>.
thanks in advance . Surely il assign the points.
email id: [email protected]
Urs,
Raki.

Hey Lilly,
Yep i have deleted the contents of ODS sucessfully and i have reloaded it sucesfully but from biw side there is no problem as i feel.
So i requested my onsite people to look in to the oracle db table how many records are available.Later then we will make take some decision .
So still the problem isnot solved il be updating this in another couple of days.So i request u to take care this issue and now i have assigned u points also.
Thanks for ur info.
Possible give me ur personal mail id so that i can direclty drop to ur mail.
Urs,
Raki

How can I give the "user interface thread" higher priority?

We do alot of activex calls to front panels. We need to increase/decrease the priority of the user interface thread to resolve our thread problem. Anyone know how to do this?
Chuck

Hello,
As P.M. was saying, you can adjust the thread priorities
through the VI Properties dialogue.
Another place to modify the multithreading system in LabVIEW is a VI
located at: [LabVIEW Directory]\vi.lib\Utility\sysinfo.llb\threadconfig.vi. However I do not think this will remedy any
problems you are having.
From a Multithreading in LabVIEW tutorial (http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/d2e196c7416f373a862568690074c759)
Priorities in the User Interface and
Single-Threaded Applications
Within the User Interface execution
system, priority levels are handled in the same way for single-threaded and
multithreaded applications.
In single-threaded applications and
in the User Interface execution system of multithreaded applications, the
execution system queue has multiple entry points. The execution system places
higher priority VIs on the queue in front of lower priority VIs.
If a high-priority task is running and the queue contains only lower priority
tasks, the high-priority VI continues to run. For example, if the execution
queue contains two VIs of each priority level, the time-critical VIs share execution time exclusively until both finish.
Then, the high priority VIs share execution
time exclusively until both finish, and so on. However, if the higher priority
VIs call a function that waits, the execution system removes higher priority
VIs from the queue until the wait or I/O completes, assigning other tasks
(possibly with lower priority) to run. When the wait or I/O completes, the
execution system reinserts the pending task on the queue in front of lower
priority tasks. Refer to the Synchronous/Blocking Nodes section for a list of
asynchronous functions that wait.
Also, if a high priority VI calls a lower priority subVI,
that subVI is raised to the same priority level as the caller for the duration
of that call. Consequently, you do not need to modify the priority levels of
the subVIs that a VI calls to raise the priority level of the subVI.
Thus changing the priority of your VI will change the
priority of UI calls for that particular VI.
Again, I caution you because I suspect that if you are having problems
with your application not running correctly, I do not believe that manipulating
the thread priorities will resolve these issues.
Hope this helps,
Travis M
LabVIEW R&D
National Instruments

Why is time-critical thread not interrupting sleepless high priority thread?

Hello,
I have two threads running in the same execution system on a real-time PXI platform. The time-critical thread sleeps using "AI Single Scan.VI", and acquires my data at a rate of 8000 Hz.
I have a slower high priority process that calls a DLL function to calculate some filter coefficients. This function call takes longer than 1/8000 s to complete, and runs in a loop, executing as often as it can (with new data from FIFOs).
I expected the time-critical thread to interrupt the the high priority thread without problem.
I am finding that unless I insert a LabVIEW delay (for example a wait for x ms VI) in the loop, the real-time system stops responding. With a small delay (ie 1 ms), t
he acquisition completes, and a FIFO shuts down the loop of the slow process.
Why do I need a labVIEW delay in the high-priority loop, when the DLL function call itself is quite slow? Even without a DLL call, I would expect the time-critical VI to interrupt, finish its data acquisition, and shut-down the high-priority thread using its FIFO.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Frenk

Here are a couple things to try/check:
1) Check the call library node in your high priority VI. If it's orange (runs in UI thread), your high priority VI is actually switching to the UI thread every time your dll runs. That alone is not a problem. But if your TC VI tries to update any control terminals, the TC thread will switch over to the UI thread to access UI resources, possibly while the dll within your high priority VI has a lock on those resources. Why does the dll have a lock on UI resources? Because it was running in the UI thread and got interrupted by the TC thread before it finished doing its business. Not likely, but possible.
2) There's another possible reason you're seeing this behavior. If the TC VI and the high VI call a mutual subVI, the subVI will be elevated to ALWAYS run in the highest priority thread irrespective of the actual caller (in your case, it's the the TC thread). Even when the *high priority VI* calls the mutual subVI, that subVI runs in the time-critical thread, which means there's a thread switch from high to TC, then back to high after the subVI finishes. And because high and TC VIs are in the same exec system, that mutual subVI will always run in the 1 and only TC thread alotted to that exec system.
So, while your TC VI is running, you're in the TC thread. While, your high VI is running, you're in a high non-TC thread, and when your high VI calls the mutual subVI, you're again in the TC thread until the subVI finishes.
So how could this arrangement cause your TC VI to become starved by the high VI? If your TC VI wakes up while the high VI is in the middle of running the mutual subVI, the TC thread responsible for running the TC VI is actually busy (in the middle of running the subVI in your high VI!!!), so the TC thread cannot run your TC VI until it finishes running that mutual subVI.
The fix: make your TC VI run in a different exec system. It will be given its own TC thread that no one else can mess with. When TC VI wakes up, it's guaranteed a TC thread.
I think there's a good reason behind why a mutual subVI ALWAYs runs at the highest priority of all its callers, irrespective of the actual caller's priority...but I can't think of the reason at the moment.

EIM Auto pushback - requeue at higher priority?

Hello,
In our EIM 4.3.2(8) implementation (ICM Enterprise integrated queues and agents), all new and incomplete activites auto-pushback to queue after 8 hours (overnight generally). The problem with this is, they're getting pushed to the back of the queue. I'd like to have all auto-pushback emails queue at a higher priority so that during days of high email volume, we don't get stragglers that keep getting pushed to the end of the queue while newer emails get handled.
I saw this:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Transferred_Emails_Get_Sent_To_End_of_Queue
and thought maybe I could pull some Activity related column through to ICM to act on to change the priority... Not sure what I should use though. I considered looking at the "WHEN_CREATED" field and upping the priority in ICM if that's more than a day ago, but I wonder if there is a simpler way to do this.
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

New tasks are sent from EIM to ICM in order queue priority, activity priority and oldest - in that order. While sending new task there is no differentiation between new email first time in queue Vs email which is auto pushed back to queue, if queue and activity priority are same then oldest activity criteria will be honored.
There is no other way in default EIM product to push auto pushed back emails ahead of others.

Listing Items based on criteria e.g. High Priority Items First.

Hi,
One of our customers have a need to List High Priority Items first on the WebTools site.
Let's take two ItemCodes for example: Printer001, and, Monitor001.
>> If these two items are included in the same category then Monitor001 will appear before Printer001 as WebTools sorts in alphabetic ascending order;
>> But, our customer wants Printer001 to appear before Monitor001 as it is an Item higher in priority that Printer001.
I can think of two possible solutions:
1/2) Prefix Items with a number or letter to have it appear first in the WebTools default sort order. E.g. Rename "Monitor001" as "AMonitor001". This will not be possible for existing Items in SAP, so it doen't solve the issue,
Or,
2/2) Customize the Default WebTools Item List block to sort Items based on a User Define field called "pririty". Which might require a lot of effort.
Please advise if anyone else has solved similar issue and how.
Thanks very much for your replies in advance.

Hey Kafil ... I think you may be stuck modifying the parts list page or creating something from scratch. I'm not aware of an easy way to do this out of the box.

Is it possible in IOS to have two static routes for the same subnet, one a higher priority and "failover" between the 2?

Hi All
Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
a) Two static routes?
b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
Thanks
John

Hi John,
Hope the below explaination will help you...
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
R1(config)# ip sla 1
R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
R1# show track
Track 1
IP SLA 1 reachability
Reachability is Down
1 change, last change 00:03:19
Latest operation return code: Unknown
The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
Tracking
Return Code
Track State
Reachability
OK or over threshold
(all other return codes)
Up
Down
The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

High priority code

Hi,
I am writing a code in LabView-10, where there is a camera involved. I need it to go to a particular temperature before I should close it. If my program works fine, I have a part at the end of the code that does this job.
My problem is, if the program crashes for some reason (for parts that does not involve camera), or even if someone hit the stop execution button, the program stops abruptly and that part of the code is not being executed.
Is there a way to make something like a "High Priority" part of a code, that will always be executed no matter how the program stops.
Or any other idea that can solve this problem.
Thanks.

You need to actually code in proper error handling as well as handle how the application exits. If the code is crashing it is a sign of bugs in the code and the code should be robust enough to detact and handle errors. Without seeing your code it is impossible to give you any advice on how to improve it but from your description you basically have buggy code. You need to fix the bugs.
As for catching exit events you should detect them explicitly. NEVER allow the user to use the abort button to stop your program. It is an imediate abort and doesn't allow you to clean up. Its the equilivant of stopping your car by rnning into a wall. It will stop the car but it certainly isn't advised. You should use an explicit stop/exit button on your front panel. You can use the event structure to detect that the user has signaled a stop and then perform your normal cleanup. The event structure can also detect when the user stops the code using the X (Windows close) and again perform the necessary cleanup.
Mark Yedinak
"Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot

1) When call center Team creates Service Request/Service Order/ Complaints it should be set as High Priority by default.

Hello team ,this is my requirement .. Through customizing..
When call center Team creates Service Request/Service Order/ 　Complaints it should be set as High Priority by default...we need to set only interaction agent bussiness role priority only HIGH..only for this bussiness role.through customizing how to do it..what are the steps..through customizing only please.. help

By customizing, you can set a default priority to a given transaction type.
But this does not depend on the business role.
But as you are talking about IC agents, maybe you can check IDI for this purpose, because there are actions like "Set Problem Priority", "Set Service Request Priority" or "Set Service Order Priority".
Best regards,
Sylvain AGUETTAZ

Clear "high priority" status of incoming mail

Okay, I have several emails I have marked as "flagged" so I can sort by that field and they stay at the top. Problem is, those annoying people who think all of their email is high priority (and flag them as such) are immediately following the flagged emails. This pushes new email down the list even further.
I can't figure out how to clear that high priority status so they fall in chronological order with all the other email. Ideas?
Thanks!

You can't. The priority is being sent via a special header in the mail. These headers are created by the senders machine upon sending. Mail.app just displays the priority given in the header information. There is no way in Mail.app to alter the messages headers.

How to assign higher priority for labview while running other applications.

HI,
I am performing 2 time critical counter operations. I am using software time due to the hardware limitation of PCI6013(I have tried all other options). My problem is that I get a erractic value when I use mouse, keyboard or change to other application.
I found the following link providing a method to provide maximum priority to labview application.But even regular labview users are asked not to use this application. I am not even a regular LABview user.Is there any precaution that I should take to use this VI. I am in need of such an application very badly. Please Help.
http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=506500000008000000F5880000&UCATEGORY_0=_1
5_&UCATEGORY_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_TIER_0=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_TIER_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_0=priority&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_S=0

"Is there any precaution that I should take to use this VI."
Yes many,
When you start to experiment with settings priorities in an attempt to avoid the affects of mouse clicks, then you should brace yourself for the application appearing hung. This would happen if LV had a higher priority than the mouse interupt service routine.
Same applies to the other conditions you mentioned.
If you go this route, backup before you experiment! Some strange things can happen to your file system.
I have talked to you about this challenge of yours in another thread. This is what I recomend.
1) If you can live with your readings being made on only one gear at a time, AND the sample rate being aperiodic, then you MAY be able to use DAQ Occurances and two session. I
have not done this myself, and AM NOT SURE if it can be done or if you hardare supports it, but maybe;
a) Open two references to your and configure A so it uses hardware timing (like you already said works good) to count gear A using the other counter as the gate. On the other session you are counting gear B.
b) Configure both of the above to fire occurances when done.
c)Start only session A.
d) When A occurance fires start B.
e) When B fires start A, etc.
This will give you determinism on the counts and effectively shift the indeterminism to the update interval.
If this is not good enough then there is another option. Can you get yourself a nice solid external reference that you can apply as an external gate to both counters? If so you will be using hardware timing and you should be on the right track.
If these do not work out, you may end up having to go to different hardware.
Just trying to help,
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Create at runtime a job to run at the central instance with high priority

Hi All
Using the function modules ( job_open, job_submit and job_close ) or ( job_open, submit via job jobname number jobcount, job_close) I need that this job runs in the central instance and with high priority.
I would like to know how to inform it using the statements above? How to pass the parameters to make the job run in the central instance with high priority?
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
João Gaia

Hi
I hadn't realized about the parameter TARGETSERVER of the function module JOBCLOSE. I am going to make some tests.
thanks in advance

When i try to activate iMessage i could see the comment "waiting for activation" for more than 24hrs.Is this because of mobile device problem or someother issue ? My mobile is just 20 days old

When i try to activate iMessage i could see the comment "waiting for activation" for more than 24hrs.
Is this because of mobile device problem or someother issue ?
My mobile is just 20 days old

The following discusses that error message and may help: iOS: Troubleshooting FaceTime and iMessage activation

How to problem solve adf issue in the mx340 model

how to problem solve adf issue in the mx340 model

Alex,
the missing thing in your example is the fact, that if only one value is selected, the parameter has exact this value like BOSTON. If you choose more than one value, the parameter includes the *'*, so that it looks like *'BOSTON','NEW YORK'*. So you need to check in the package, if there's a *,* in the parameter or not. If yes there's more than one value, if not it's only one value or it's null.
So change your package to (you need to expand your variables)
create or replace package bip_departments_2_parameters
as
p_dep_2_param varchar2(1000);
p_loc_1_param varchar2(1000);
p_where_clause varchar2(1000);
function beforereporttrigger
return boolean;
end bip_departments_2_parameters;
create or replace package body bip_departments_2_parameters
as
function beforereporttrigger
return boolean
is
l_return boolean := true;
begin
p_where_clause := ' ';
if p_dep_2_param is not null then
if instr(p_dep_2_param,',')>0 then
p_where_clause := 'WHERE DNAME in ('||p_dep_2_param||')';
else
p_where_clause := 'WHERE DNAME = '''||p_dep_2_param||'''';
end if;
if p_loc_1_param is not null then
if instr(p_loc_1_param,',')>0 then
p_where_clause := p_where_clause || ' AND LOC IN ('||p_loc_1_param||')';
else
p_where_clause := p_where_clause || ' AND LOC = '''||p_loc_1_param||'''';
end if;
end if;
else
if p_loc_1_param is not null then
if instr(p_loc_1_param,',')>0 then
p_where_clause := p_where_clause || 'WHERE LOC in ('||p_loc_1_param||')';
else
p_where_clause := p_where_clause || 'WHERE LOC = '''||p_loc_1_param||'''';
end if;
end if;
end if;
return (l_return);
end beforereporttrigger;
end bip_departments_2_parameters;
I've written a similar example at http://www.oracle.com/global/de/community/bip/tipps/Dynamische_Queries/index.html ... but it's in german.
Regards
Rainer

CostCenter Group Aggregation problem. High Priority Issue.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for