Costing on Internal Orders with different plan versions

Hi,
Is it possible to carry out Costing on Internal Orders using different plan versions?
I would like to carry out more than one costing on Internal Order so that I could compare different versions. Maybe there are other parameters (other than plan versions) which can be used for executing different parallel costing.
Best wishes,
Karol

Hi Karol,
In Release 3.0, the following new planning functions are available in order planning:
<b>Copy plan versions</b>
In Release 3.0, you can plan order costs for internal orders in different versions. In contrast to earlier releases, you can now
1. change versions
2. copy versions
3. Here you can select :
                             the planned values to be copied: annual or total values
                             whether the planned values in the target version are to be retained or overwritten compare versions using the information system
Planned values are not revaluated in the target version (for example, when you change the value date).
Overhead and settlements are not copied and, if required, must be repeated in the target version
Regards,
Hemachandra K S
<b>Please, donot forget to mark the answer as Helpful, Very Helpful or Problem solved.</b>

Similar Messages

  • BAPI KPF6 POST PLAN COST FOR INTERNAL ORDER AND COST ELEMENT

    Hi all gurus,
    I would like to use in a custom report a BAPI/Function Module that help me to simulate KPF6 in order to post planning costs for internal order and cost element (layout 1-401).
    So the input should be:
    1) Version
    2) period from
    3) periodo to
    4) year
    5) internal order n.
    6) cost element n.
    7) value
    I found a lot of BAPI but don't know the correct one and how to use it (example how to fill the input value).
    Can anyone help me on that?
    Kind Regards

    In additio  to the previous I found the BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTPRIMCOST but don't know if it's the correct one and how to use it (some example fitting the my case will be very appreciated).
    If the quoted BAPI is correct.
    I tested it filling all fields as following:
    HEADERINFO:
    CO_AREA=FFCA
    FISC_YEAR=2008
    PERIOD_FROM=001
    PERIOD_TO=012
    DOC_HDR_TX='blank'
    INDEXSTRUCTURE:
    OBJECT_INDEX=000001
    VALUE_INDEX=000004 (hope this point at Interna Order)
    ATTRIB_INDEX=000000
    COOBJECT:
    OBJECT_INDEX=000001
    ORDERID=ZO53-08IMZ
    TOTVALUE:
    VALUE_INDEX=000004
    COST_ELEM=3224048
    FIX_VALUE= 200,0000
    DIST_KEY_FIX_VAL=2
    The Return table is set to 0. Nothing happens.....I suspect something related to indexstructure or index is wrong..
    Could anyone help me on that?
    Kind Regards

  • CK11n with activity prices from different plan versions

    Hello,
    We are looking for a simple & practical way to calculate a standard cost estimate for a material using activity prices from different CO plan version.
    In the valuation variant of the costing variant the CO plan version is determined from where the activity prices are taken, eg version 0
    So, we want to cost the same material using the activity prices of a different plan version, eg 90, or 91 ... but without using a different costing variant per CO plan version(so without having to create/customize a separate costing variant per CO plan version)
    Is this possible? 
    Can we use costing versions in this respect?
    Many thanks
    Alain

    Hi,
    Thanks for quick feedback ... but how do you assign this valuation variant in the costing version... ?
    Can you enter is in CK11n? or what transaction needs to be customized?
    Thanks, Alain

  • How to generate SNP planned order with different category

    Our SNP system receives Forecast and Salse Order from DP system.
    and we'd like to generate SNP planned order with different category..for example, 'AI' for Forecast Demand and 'AL' for Sales Order..
    currently, If we run CTM, system generate SNP planned order with the
    same category 'AI'..
    another system(APS) in Our company receives planned order from SNP
    and they want to receive planned order for forecast and planned order for sales order seperately..

    It is not directly achievable however can be done through BADIs and two CTM profile. I am assuming that sales orders are planned ahead of Forecast demands. So have two CTM profiles - one for Sales Orders (regenerative mode) and the other for Forecast Demands (net change mode). You may have to invoke two BADIs in the first run for Sales Orders - one that changes master data by putting a temperory Forecast Horizon in SNP2 tab (BADI /sapapo/ctm_matloc). The other BADI (BADI /sapapo/ctm_orders) changes the ATP category just before saving. in the second run though you just need to run the latter BADI by saving it in the ATP category required. BADIs can be invoked based on CTM profiles used.

  • TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

    Hi PS Expets,
    I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
    Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
    delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
      CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
    This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
    But this also eliminate the display of the cost  from the internal order.
    Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
    Kind regards,
    Anne

    Hello Tison.
    I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
    Best regards.
    Jens Schmid

  • Query to compare different Plan versions in CCA

    My requirement is to create a Cost Center query that compares two different plan versions, selected by the user with different time periods. We do not use any SEM functionality and are in version 3.0B.
    There is a standard R3 report but this gives a total figure and does not split the figures by periods.
    Does anyone know a Business Content query that can resolve this issue?

    Hi ,
    Instead of going for a business content query u can go for a formula variable using replacement path and assign the required values for the output and in that by using the customer exit with the help of abapers
    Hope this will be a clear solution to ur problem
    Pls assign full points if answer is satisfied
    Regards ,
    Subash Balakrishann

  • Multiple Orders with Different reasons on a Single day

    Hi,
    I am recently learning Device Management of IS-U Electricity. Now I have a problem with meter reading orders generated at the time of periodic meter reading with reason 01 and different system generated orders with reasons like 22, 21 , 16 and 11 which are the orders get created internally based on device replacement and modification.
    If the scheduled meter reading date lies on the day or the day before of device replacement or modification, the meter reading for the periodic order is getting prorated based on the meter reading entered at the time of replacement or modification. This is what I dont want.
    Is it possible to have multiple orders with different reasons on the same date? Any configuration changes are welcome.
    - Arghya

    Hi,
    You can acheive this using following config changes.
    SAP Utilities --> Device Managment -->Meter Reading --> Meter Reading Order -->Order Creation --> Define Automatic Interpolation for Meter Reading Reason.
    Uncheck  the 'Auto Interpolation' flag for Meter Reading reason 01.
    This will not use the Replacement or Modifiaction read.
    Let me know if anything more is reuiqred.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ranjit Thakur.

  • Internal order with excise problem

    Dear All
    W have internal order budgeting for consumables.whenever we make purchase order , the account assignment category is f and we purcahse against the particular internal order.
    when G/R is done the consumable material gets cosnumed against the particular interla order. ie goods receipt and the issue against the internal order with same movement type.
    here is  the problem
    Whenevere G/R is made the part 1 register(country india version) gets updated .
    But because of goods issue against internal order , the part 1 register shows both the receipt and the issue . so whenever the excise invoice is made through  j1iex thesystem shows that part 1 entry is not vailable.
    In the part 1 register printout  shows the receipt and the removal of goods.
    as per the excise regulations the part 1 entry sholud be there for the particular material. please suggest how to avoid the removal entry in part 1 register. only receipt has to be updated in the part 1 not the removal ie goods issue.
    please suggest how to overcome this issue.
    With Regards
    balaji

    What is G/R?

  • Internal order with a budget

    I have a real internal order with a budget.
    In case I create the settlement of the internal order by period end- how this will impact from the budget point of view
    (I am steeling the cost with the original account to a cost center).
    I mean to say-  will the system refer the settlement as a deduction in cost - so i will have more available budget- this is  a scenario I am not interested in.
    How can i solved this conflict (in case this conflict is in place).

    Hi
    If you are settling to a Budget controlled object i.e. the receiver also has a budget on it - In that case, settlement would release the budget from sender IO
    Else, it does not
    br, Ajay M

  • Production order variance settlement to cost centers/internal order

    Hi,
    I am looking to configure the settlement of production order variances to cost centers/internal order. Is there a way to do this in the settlement profile. Would appreciate your help.
    Thank you,
    Ram

    OKO7 will allow you to configure the Settlement Profile by selecting valid receivers.
    This should be done with/or by FICO.
    Then test, test, test
    award points if helpful
    Althea

  • SAP Report to track cost by Internal Order

    Hi Expert,
    for audit purpose, I want to track the Cost by Internal Order, please suggest me in sap have any report to track down?
    below format is an example.
    release code   cost center        internal order number   PR number  PO number  SES number  vendor name  desc of item cost of item
    Thanks.

    Hi Pal,
    Many Thanks for your input, as per your recommendation
    Mani as you suggested ME2K was working fine, but anyway we need to drill down further to double of each field.
    As Nico suggested building a query, to view all at a same time is good & perfect to use.
    So please suggest me, what are the tables and fields map to build a query? because Itu2019s very easy for me to assign fast.
    Regards,

  • Single invoice for multiple orders with different divisions

    Dear All,
    while I am trying to do single invoice for muliple orders with different divisons invoice is gettting splitted..In copy control vbrk routine I  tried with 003 and 007 etc..but result is same..what configuration need to be done for getting the single invoice
    Thanks In advance
    Regards
    CNRNAIR

    Hello
    single invoice for multiple orders with "different divisions" invoice is getting split
    FYI - Different Division means different Sales Area.
    So, sales doc (whether sales order, Delivery & Billing) is applicable to EXACTLY one sales area.
    Thus, combining docs with different sales area is practically impossible.
    Provided, you are using common division.
    Hope this assist you,
    Thanks & REgards
    JP

  • Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'

    Dear All
    I want Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'
    i.e
    Created Assets with Tcode As01
    Created Internal Order and assigned budget amount to IO with Tcode KO01 and KO22
    Created Purhcase Requisition with Account assignment catg as 'A' i.e asstes. Also given Internal Order No and Asset code in PR.
    Releases PR with ME54N
    Created Purchase Order with Account assignemnt catg as 'A' i.e asstes.  In Purchase Order it displays Internal Order No. and Asset code which i have given in PR in Account assignemnt tab on Item level
    Released Purchase Order.
    Now i am checking budget detail in Tcode : S_ALR_87013019  -> List: Budget/Actual/Commitments ,  Here it gives message , "No line item were selected " in Commitment line items.
    Actually  my requirement is , i want budgeting thru internal order and want to use Account assignment category as 'A' (Assets) in PR and PO.
    Why it's not showing detail in report S_ALR_87013019  .
    What is solution for my requirement. Is it possible with some configuration or by other options.
    Thanx & Regards
    Swati Shah

    Hi Swati,
    You can do this in Asset Accounting. By standard MIGO Posting Date is taken as capitalization date for asset. You can configure to make it 'Document Date'.
    So, whenever user is posting thru MIGO, he will have better control on deciding capitalization date by inputting appropriate date in Document Date Field in MIGO.
    Check this thread..
    Re: Depreciation start date for asset thru MIGO
    Regards,
    Sayujya

  • Product cost by sales order with Valuated Sales order stock

    Hi Gurus,
    I am working on Poduct cost by Sales Order with Valuated stock. but i have doubt ragarding to Cost estimation.
    1.In sales order scenario also Standard Cost estiamtion (CK11n and CK24) and Marking, Releasing is Mandatory? if not how can we estimate the cost?
    2. If we are estimating the cost by using Standard Cost estimate, when can we estimate the cost?
                can anybody please give me the steps which we are following in Poduct cost by Sales Order with Valuated stock from starting to end Settlement
    Thanks&Regards
    Prasad

    Hi,
    there are 3 types of scenarios in MTO.
    In Two scenarios Sale Order would be cost object - (Non-Valuated Sale orders stock and Valuated Sale Order stock with Sale order being Cost Object)
    In third scenario (Valuated Sale Order Stock without Sale Order controlling), Only Production Order is the Cost Object.
    In all the cases wherever the Sale Order is the cost object, Sale Order is the final Receiver.  Only the difference is that in valuated sale order stock, stock entries would be passed to FI and in non-valuated sale order, no goods movement for FG will be there.
    Please let me know if you need further details in this regard
    Surya

  • SAP report which display PO nos based  on cost center, Internal orders

    Hi.
    I am looking for a report in MM which will display the list of purchase orders for a cost center, Internal orders etc.
    The report output should have ALV grid format,The output of the report should have material no or short text, PO quantity, PO Price, PO value. GR qty, GR value,IR qty, IR value, G/L to which consumption has posted etc.
    Reports ME2K, MB5S, ME80FN do not show the G/L account to which GR value is posted.
    Basically I am looking for a existing report which is readily available.

    Hi
    I dont think there is standard report. we have developed custom report one of my previous project.
    YOu can try a abap query using tables EKKO, EKPO, EKBE and EKKN.
    regards
    Srinivas

Maybe you are looking for