Costing Relevancy to be activated
Dear Experts
As per our costing requirment,they want to valuate materials based on certain parameter like count in Textile industry,
suppose we are putting 100rs.mtr &
if we are using 60s count yarn price should pick 25%
if we are using 80s count yarn price should pick 50%
For this activity to be done,We want costing relevancy in BOM & Routing to be activated by percentages.
But option is not working in our client,shall we have do any customisation for that.
Regards
Sandeep
Dear Sandeep,
For individual BOM Components you can decide whether its relevant to 100% costing or 50 %.
But in the routing for individual operation I dont think it's possible to set its 100 % relevant to costing or 50
% relevant to costing.Either you can set its relevant or ir-relevant.
For BOM,after assigning the BOM components,select a single component (Row),then press F7---->Click
on Status/Long Text tab key->there you can see costing relevancy->select one from the option.
Also check the configuration setting in T code OS18.
Regards
Mangalraj.S
Similar Messages
-
Costing relevancy in BOM "X" is not active.
Dear Experts
After MRP run, trying to convert Planned order to Proc. order the <b>costing relevancy in BOM "X" is not active</b>. But when i am trying to create process order with manually(cor1) costing relevancy in BOM "X" is active. Can i know y this is happening??
Note: In <b>Goods receipt</b> TAB of procees order <b>Goods recept non valuated </b> check box is active.
Regards
Rageshplease note sales order creation date is not relevant...when the system is reading the BOM is relevant to copy the BOM...just check the date of BOM explosition...
As I know it is just because of master data.
In routing...is it relavent to costing or not? -
Costing relevancy in prod order
Hi.
We have a production order with all the components fixed to relevancy for
costing. sometimes we need to change the component at prod order level,
If we change the component, indicator / tick for "relevancy of costing" is disappering at general data of order.
we have ETO , MTO & MTS scenario in our plant.
Above mention problem is only for ETO order tyes prod orders.
Is there any setting/config for order types to select costing relevancy tick.
Thanks in advance.
JeevanThanks for the reply, but costing relevancy is activated at operation level,
normal prod orders are getting created correctly, but when we change the componentin CO02 then costing relevancy is getting disapper.
Waiting for your reply. -
Costing relevancy for operation in standard costing
Dear all:
We are using standard costing, with the usual master data (routing operations, work centers, activity tariffs, bill of material).
Due to certain specific operations we would like in certain routings that certain operations would have a fixed relevance for the cost calculation and subsequently for the real cost.
If we changed the planned time for the operation, notifications would need to be calculated (that is, if the real time is 45 min, and we have reduced the planned time in 80% we would have to notify 9 minutes).
If we change the tariff, this would affect to all the routings linked to thart work center.
We would also rather work with the current work center, so that we would not need to change our plant reports.
The Costing relevancy of the operation in the routing is not apropiate for this, as it only works for inventory costing.
Any simple idea to achieve that?
Thanks for your help.Ariel,
In master receipe, without maintaining operation the phase can not be maintained.
Scheduling & costing of the process order are dependent on phase.
So hierarchly phase is below the operation but have importance than that of operation.
Control receipe destination is the mandatory entry.
Hope this helps you.
SmanS -
Cost relevancy indicator for Material
Dear PS colleagues,
Refer to the subject, when we assign a material to activity then sometimes cost relevancy indicator (on General Data tab for material) is ticked & sometimes not, can you guide me how it is controlled.It seems that it may me controlled from material master but not sure.Pl suggest...
Regards,
Ashok SangalHi,
All materials which are account assigned to network/ activity, or WBS element are defaulted with cost-relevancy indicator, though this can subsequently be changed manually. This defaulting is hard-coded (as far as I know) and is dependent on the procurement type . For instance, if you attach a stock (cat:L)material component with collective requirement indicator in MRP4 to a network activity and if you opt for procurement type "Planned Indpendent requirement", you will find that 'Cost Relevancy" indicator is not defauluted. For the same material component with the setting material master settings, if you opt for procurement type "Reservation to Network", the cost relevancy indicator gets defaulted.
Obviously, text type materials etc. will not have any cost relevancy.
Hence, we can conclude that materials which are account assigned (i.e which are relevant for adding cost to proejct objects) will be defaulted with "Cost relevancy" indicator.
If you use BOM transfer functionality, you can define the cost relevancy in the "Profile for BOM transfer"
Hope the information provided is useful and relevant.
Regards
Muraleedharan.R -
Shipment cost relevance checkbox
*Hi Gurus,*
*I got a recent issue with shipment cost relevance check box. My shipment type is shipment cost relevant and by customizing it has been set. while creating new shipment always this box is defaulting ticked .But user reported few shipment Nos. where it has not been ticked and am not able to find out the actual reason. While creating test case it is always working properly. User confirmed there is no manual untick of the checkbox. Can you suggest me any probable reason why this checkbox box is getting unticked automatically?*
*Thanks in advance*Check in T_57 to see if you have activated the Shipment type under the Header and Leg whichever you are looking for.
There can be two reasons:
Check if the shipment is a old one.
Check if he is using the right shipment type. -
Setting default costing relevancy on IW31
Hi all,
i have problems with the definition of the default value of the costing relevancy during the creation of an orden by the transaction IW31.
In particular i have to set that default value just for a specific order type.
is it possible doing it?
Thanks.
LelloHi,
To define your own logic you can use BAdI IWO1_ORDER_BADI with method CHANGE_COSTRELEVNCY to set 'relevant for costing flag'. See also some information in note [649743|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/649743].
-Paul -
Issue with update of BOM by Variant Config - Cost relevant indicator
Hi All VC Expert,
We are facing an issue with the update by reference characteristic of the field STPO-SANKA Cost relevancy indicator on the BOM.
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 release 700 on Oracle
Hot Package
- SAPKA70015 on ERP Cross Application componenent
- SAPKH60013 on SAP-APPL Logistics and accouting
We are using material variant
We are on the first level of configuration
Classically, we built a procedure to set X to this data base field as below :
$self.STPO_SANKA = 'X'
We assigned this procedure to the relevant items
Here is the result we have:
At the creation of the Plan Order, this is not working
At the creation of the Prod Order, this is not working
When we do a Reload PP master data, this is working very well
On CU50/VA02 when we check the trace, the procedure is executed.
Do somebody have an idea or already facing this and solve it ?
Thanks in advance for your appreciated help.Hi Fabien. Did you solve your problem?
-
Use of cost relevant Item categories L2N and G2N for debit and credit memo
Dear Forum memebers,
For credit and debit memo one of the customised client repot is showing cost value which is not expected for credit and debit memo in the invoice register.
This is due to use of L2N and G2N which are cost relevant item categories.
Why should debit and credit memo item category should be cost relevant.??
Best Regards,
KanwalWell if your company do not want to adjust the cost of goods sold when any credit / debit is raised, then yes you can go ahead.
Thanks
Sai
Edited by: Sai on Nov 18, 2009 7:47 PM -
Shipment Cost Relevance field grayed out. Possibility to make this editable
When we create a TD shipment document, based on the shipment type control data, the value of the field Shipment cost relevance is updated.
This field is always grayed out, where there is no option to edit.
When we check the standard description, we can see that this is an proposal for shipment cost relevance and can be modified if required.
Is there any such possibility to do so (other than by customising the shipment type parameters), if so, please proivde the process.
Thanks & Regards,
Pavan.Use t-code T_57,
select shipment type then click on shipment cost relevance, make sure is there tick mark for header.
if any quiry revert back.
kapil -
Material in which Costing relevancy has not been maintained in routing
Hi,
I want list of materials for which Costing relevancy has not been maintained in routing process. Kindly let us know report/table name.
Regards....Kaushal MaheshwariWe need to list of all in-house material, so ca03 will not solve purpose & MAKL is structure table so we are not able to generate list of such items.
Regards.....Kaushal -
Material in which Costing relevancy has not been maintained
Hi,
I want list of materials in which Costing relevancy has not been maintained. From where i can see it...in which table??
Thanks.Dear,
Do Not Cost
Controls whether a cost estimate or a procurement alternative can be
created for a material.
Use
If you select this indicator, you cannot create any of the following for
this material:
o Material cost estimate (with or without quantity structure)
o Sales order cost estimate
o Procurement alternative
The material is excluded from selection and BOM explosion, so that no
cost component split will be created by the costing process. If the
material is included in another cost estimate as a component to be
valuated, the valuation price is determined through the valuation
variant if no cost estimate with the same key exists for the material.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi. -
Costing Relevancy indicator cannot be set as 50%
Hello,
I have a issues with costing relevancy indicator in production order item. It doesnot consider the % such as (25% or 50%) costing relevancy. Only 100% or " " is considered.
Kindly let me know the steps to achieve the 50% costing relevancy for order component.
Best Regards
SameerHi UKSAPPP ,
I have checked transaction OS18 and found that the factors are maintained. Actually i am looking for the 50% cost of component in production order planned cost. Does this come under inventory coseting as per you reply?
Because the customer wants this in production order cost for that component where this relevancy to costing is maintained as 50%.
Regards
Sameer -
Hi All,
When i add components in BOM, automatic costing relevancy is coming in statua long text. how can we keep this field blank when ever adding the component in BOM.
RegardsHi Rakesh
In your Item category setting, in Business Data area, please check whether Determine cost is flagegd or not
If, its flagged means, it Indicates whether, during pricing, the system determines the cost (stock value) of a sales document item.
Use
The system checks the cost determination indicator as a requirement before applying the condition type that calculates the cost -
Hi guys,
M a bit new in SAP.so this question may sound very basic.
My question is when we go to item data in BOM,there is a tab status/lng text.
In that tab there is costing relevancy indicator field.
If i need it to be x all the time and it should be default to all items,what settings need to be done.
Thanks,
SamThanks a lot Ganesh/Anish,
You gave me the required solutution.Can I ask you guys another question?
If i am copying my prod bom from SD bom and the indicator u told me about is not set for SD BOM,will that indicator still appear in production BOM?
Regards,
SAM
Maybe you are looking for
-
"Windows encountered an unexpected error" while configuring devices
I've run into an interesting issue after upgrading from SP1 to R2. Two of my images are failing while Windows configures devices at 72%. The models are Lenovo x131 and x140 which were previously working before the upgrade. All other images are workin
-
Inventory listing report to view item balance with the model number in R3
Hi, Anyone have any ideas does R3 provide standard report to view the report with inventory listing on balance,description,model number? Kindly provide the t-code.
-
Everything is up to date on my ipod. firmware, and running itunes 7. I sync my music and about throught 250 songs I get a "attempting to copy to the disk "martell" failed. An unknown error occured (-69). What is causing this, and how can I fix it. I'
-
Is Mt. Lion compatible with Final Cut Pro 7?
I am currently running Lion (10.7.5) on a 27" iMac 3.4 Ghz. Is Mt. Lion compatible with Final Cut Pro 7 and FCS 3? Will these programs still run or will they be not supported by the new OS as has been the case with past apps when a new OS is introduc
-
My sister gave me her old iphone. I have the apple id and password, but where do I find that in the phone? Do I need to reset the phone before I deactivate her account and set up mine?