Costing Report summarized production cost by Finished Goods Material

Dear Expert,
I am looking for a report that can summarized the production cost in production order by Finished Goods Material Number.
or a report that can show me the cost components incurred related to a Finished Goods Material.
Can any expert enlighten me? please help.
Thanks a lot.

Hi
I would recommend the product drilldown reports in KKO0...
For this you will have to do settings in OKN0 (Asisgn a Cost Comp Structure and specify the Product Group)
After this, execute KKRV to collect the summarized data and then you can use KKO0 reports
It gives cost of production as per the Cost Comp Str and also the product no, product group, Prod Order etc
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

How to get unit cost for finished goods in prod order

HI all,
IN a production order of type PP04, there is cost analysis you can get from CO03. This shows the cost for finished goods and BOM components. Would anyone know how the cost for finished goods are calculated ? The issue i have is that the unit cost of the finished goods is not correct. It is higher than what it should be. I looked at the moving avg price at material master but the cost used in calculation is different than in material master. Can anyone shed light how finished goods are calculated and why it is picking up a higher unit cost ? Where is the higher cost coming from for finished goods material as shown in CO03 ? The BOM materials are picking unit cost correctly. Would this have anything to do with cost settlement ?
thank you.
joyce

Hi,
Finished goods price will depend on BOM componenet price, activity price and overhead price. Check whether this prices are picking correctly or not.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Production date of finished goods

Dear Experts,
How to check production date of finished goods products.
wilson

Hi..
what I would say that production date would be the confirmed finish date.. if you open any production order..there is a field for this confirmed finish date.. it is the field which gets updated when u do the GR of finished product...
Let me know if u have different requirement.
I think Prasobh seems to be more accurate to ur requirement...
Neeraj
Edited by: NEERAJ BHARDWAJ on Mar 27, 2009 8:12 AM

Good Issue batch Flows at GR for finish good Material

Hi Gurus,
Please Help me on below scenarios
1)Good issue material batch and its characteristic automatically flows to Finish Good Material at the time of Good receipt of Process order.
2) If Component of Finish Material ie Good issue material is having the different batches issued to the Finish material Process order then System should only consider those batch which is having the Characteristic values is having more that 50%
Exam : Good Issue material X and requirement qty 10
Then Component issue 10 qty with 2 batches A and B
Batch A Qty 5 : Char Value Batch B Qty 5 Char Value
Density 10 Density 15
Tthen Finished Good batch consider only batch B which is having the maximum density.
Here we want the same batch B and it should automacticaly flows to the Finish product at the time of GR ( Process order )
I tried with Batch derivation but we want the same Good issue batch to finished material
Please help me on this scanrios and if we are going for development then how it is possible technically ( with Functioan specification)
Regards,
Saurabh

Hi Gurus,
Please look above the scenario and reply.
Regards,
Saurabh

Background Usage decision of FERT material (Finished good material)

DEaR ExPert,
I have some problem regarding background Usage decision of FERT material (Finished good material)
A inspection lot will be generated against production order fert material and all batch will be post movement type 321 Trough qa16 UD Foreground but when i doing UD thorught UD background this error will be appear
No batch input data for screen SAPLIPW1 0200
Message no. 00344
Kindly elaborate me
Regards
Pirya Sharma

This is more related to your i/p data screen or Variant which you are executing.
Nitin

Excise Invoice cannot be captured for RG1(Finished Goods) material

Dear Friends,
While creating GR and choosing the option only capture Excise Invoice system showing error as follows:
Excise Invoice cannot be captured for RG1(Finished Goods) material
Message no. 4F276
The Material is a Raw Material(ROH) and Price control is "V".Pl tell me and earlier 3 times GR is done on this material w/o error.
Pl help me how to get rid of this error.
Regards,
Ask

In GR check in Excise item tab under excise item whether it is showing Raw Material or Finished goods?
Simulteneously check in J1ID for the said material & chapter-id combination what material type has been maintained?
Regards,
Indranil

Issue in creating Finish Good Material for specific sales area

I am trying to create a new "finished good material" through "MM01" , after selecting "industory sector" & "Material type" I have also selected the views the next screen comes is for Organization level ,
when I select Plant , sales org & distribution channel and press enter an error comes "Company Code 1000 is not set up for Material Managment".
please help me out.

hi,
Check few things:
1. Check whether the plant is assigned to the co.code which it is showing and the Material is maintained for the same plant...
2. Check whether there is proper assignment of the porg to co.code
Porg to plant, etc...
If plant is not assigned to cocode then assign it in OX18....
Or
If you are using the IDES, then try with the other plant and material...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Actual Cost of finished goods in MIGO

Hi,
The value of Finished material in FI Document generated in MIGO takes the (Goods Receipt Quantity) X (Planned/Moving average Price from material master), Where as it should take the Total Actual Price calculated after Order Confirmation Based on Actual Material Purchase Price & Actual Activity Posting Value.
For example:
Present scenario
Material-> MIGO QTY>Moving Avg Price -->MIGO FI Document Value
Finished> 1000 EA> Rs. 10/ EA--
>Rs. 10,000=00
Required Scenario:
MIGO FI Document value= (Purchase Value of Raw Material)+ ((Activity Posted while Confirmation)X(Activity price))
Thanks.

Hi,
What u said is right Mr Kapil.. See when u do GR From Production Order System Calculate Moving Price or Planned Price from
material Matser .
As per ur Reuirement u told it should calculate (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD).
it is possible only when order quantity is less , suppose say your order qty is 150 mt per day and your Plant capacity is 500mt
per day production will be done in a half day, sale can be done on same day after Production with the formula what u told.
If suppose say , Your order is 2000 ton of Oil , it will take u to complete 4 days for your Total production as you told, GR should
be done on (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD) formula, you dont know exact activity price for 2000 ton until u finish your total
production, at the same time until u do GR sales cannot be done. So in SAP Gr is intially done on Moving Average Or Planned
(Standard Price) , After totla Prodcution GR is Compared with Actual Cost(Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD)= :"Variance".
Plus are MInus is Reduced or added to Finished Goods Account or PP account during Settlement.
If any wrong Pls Correct me Experts,
Pavan

Allocation of overhead cost to finished goods through vendors and raw mat.

We are trying to allocate a cost base in our purchasing department of around 200 mio dkk to our finished products. These products we manufacture ourselves. The cost represents salaries and external services
The outcome of an ABC study has been to allocate these costs, first on vendor level based on the total spent on each vendor and subsequently to the raw materials from each vendor based on value. The cost of purchasing should then be included in cost estimate of the raw material and hence in the cost of the finished goods through the bill of materials.
Our challenge now is to implement this algorithm into our product costing system in SAP.
The easy solution from the point of view of the SAP department is to have cost controllers doing the math of calculating the cost per material number in Excel and then allocate this rate through a costing sheet or a template.
But this solution on the other hand leaves the users with an extra manual task which again leaves room for error and it reduces transparency.
So has anyone tried implementing such a calculation scheme in product costing?

Hi
As far as I know, SAP does not support this... What you can do is
1. Calculate this price outside the system and include this overhead in the Plan Price of raw material (Costing 2 View).. So, this gets included in raw mat price itself
or
2. if you want to see it as an overhead, you need to arrive at an overhead% which you may calculate as Amount of these Expenses / Total raw material cost and apply this % across
Study the historic data of past 3-4 years to see if the % remains more or less stable
br, Ajay M

Material backflush in production order after finished goods GR

Dear all,
I once started similiar topic several months ago, but didn't recieved any response. I'm gonna give it another try, so maybe you'll be able to support me after all.
So, the situation is like this. We have a production order, in which MC team maintained the materials to consume. The problem is, that very often it comes that we have to use same material part, but under 2-3 different partnumbers. E.G.:
Production order target: 1000 finished goods
Required materials: Part A 1000 pcs, Part B1 700 pcs, Part B2 300 pcs, Part C 1000 pcs, Part D1 150 pcs, Part D2 450 pcs, Part D3 400 pcs.
So yes, in case when it is Part B1, B2 and etc. it means that we're using physically the same part, but under different partnumbers. The problem is, that those material are all coming in pieces, not in meters or anything, and we can't allow to have, for example, 0.7 pcs of any of those materials (cause obviously you can't have 0.7 pcs of LCD panels stored in the warehouse).
It wouldn't be a problem if we could just confirm all operations in production order in 1 batch, but production order is being confirmed partially, every time the pallet with finished goods is being released from production line (we have integrated system, that sends requests to SAP to confirm specific quantity of finished goods in production order). So, as an example, if 1 pallet contains 15 pcs of finished goods, you have 67 confirmations for production order [(66*15)+(1*10)]. And, since all those materials come in PCS, SAP is rounding up consumption if it has decimal, which leads to wrong materials consumption.
Initially, I had an idea of adding 1 more operation in production order, which was supposed to be a manual use only, after finished goods GR, and MC team supposed to assign those B1\B2 and etc. material to this operation E.G.:
Operation 0010 - consume material from work center A
Operation 0020 - consume material from work center B
Operation 0030 - finished goods GR (milestone)
Operation 0040 - consume material from work center C
My idead was rejected, since I was told that after GR for finished goods is done and you continue consuming materials in production order - it will not be shown in financial reporting (don't know the details, it was quite a straight reject, without much explanation).
So, question is - is there a way to consume materials after finished goods GR without creating mess in financial reporting, or if not - what other options do I have?
thank you in advance

Hi Valentin,
After GR also you can do goods issue. Till the order status is CLSD (Closed) you can book cost on to the order.
Two ways to consume materials on order.
In order component overview maintain the required part number with quantity. GI as can done with reference to order MB1A 261 movement type.
Directly do GI with MB1A -261 movement type - Input the order number, material number and qty.
Refer to the below discussion on unplanned GI which was discussed yesterday,
http://scn.sap.com/message/14850196#14850196
Thank & Regards,
Ramagiri

Uploading Production Requirements For Finished Goods From External System To Run MRP For Components in SAP.

Hello Production Planning experts,
I'm looking to solve the current business problem:
The company bought a third party software (JD Edwards) to calculate production requirements instead of using SAP's standard Production Planning or a tool like SAP's APO. They run a batch job to query Sales Orders, Deliveries, available stock, stock in transit, etc. from sap and feed/upload it to the third party software so it can calculate the Finished Goods Production Requirements for them. They love the third party software, so replacing it is not an option. Since the third party software is already taking into account Sales Orders, Deliveries, available stock, stock in transit, etc. from SAP, it just outputs a "Finished Goods Production Schedule" by week.
My questions are:
1) What's the best way to upload something like that in SAP in the form of Planned Orders or something of that nature?
After i get that schedule in SAP:
2) Is there any way to calculate components' requirements for that "Finished Goods Production Schedule" alone? The company would like to IGNORE existing stock AND expected-goods-issues in the future (sales orders, deliveries, etc) for Finished Goods ONLY. The components calculations would work the standard MRP way, taking into account existing stock and AND expected-goods-issues in the future (sales orders, deliveries, etc)
I started looking into Master Production Schedule (MPS), but I don't know if that's the right approach since I'm not very familiar with it.
Thanks in Advance! I will gladly reward points for helpful/correct answers.

Hello Oscar
I suggest you to upload your production plan in the for of "Planned Independent Requirements" using BAPI BAPI_REQUIREMENTS_CREATE. Later, MRP will create planned orders to cover the PIRs.
If you don't want to consider the existing stock of the finished product, you should use the planning strategy 11 to create your PIRs. Take a look on the following link for more details about this planning strategy:
Gross Requirements Planning (11) - Demand Management (PP-MP-DEM) - SAP Library
Here you will find the following information:
The make-to-stock strategy gross requirements planning is particularly useful in mass production environments; it is often combined with repetitive manufacturing. This strategy is particularly useful if you need to produce, regardless of whether you have stock or not. For instance, steel or cement producers might want to use this strategy because they cannot shut down production; a blast furnace or a cement factory must continue to produce, even if this means having to produce to stock.
This strategy is also frequently used if there is a Material Requirements Planning system in a legacy system that needs to be linked to an SAP system which serves as a production execution system. The legacy system calculates a specific production plan, which has to be executed, regardless of the stock situation in the SAP system
It looks like this planning strategy is exactly what you are looking for.
BR
Caetano

Rework on sales return finished goods material

Hi all,
There is sales return finished good in stock.
This FG is rejected by quality assurance due to some quality reasons.
Now, rework to be done on this FG to make it as per quality standards,
After rework the material code of FG will remain same and sales will dispatch this FG in the same code.
How to show this rework process and what r the steps.

Hi,
This is handled via Rework Order type, I Feel PP would be the better forum to Get better details regarding your issue, its a normal process in production to do rework on materials once they are identified as not meeting the required specification.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Additional cost for finished goods

Hi all,
Here we are following fifo method valuation. we are using SAP B1 2007B PL 04.
I have a doubt how do we account the additional cost like Rent, Electricity etc.
and What G/L Account need to specify at determination level. Here we are determing G/L account with account groups.
I have a document for that but that doesnt give me clear picture of additional cost and
G/L accounts.
Kindly explain me in details with respectives to G/L Accounts
Regards
Shashi

Hi Shashi,
static costs should be included in a BOM as standard cost items. This will add to the item cost of the finished product.
Have a look at our Wiki here (Expert on Phone Newsletter April 2008):
[How to include labour cost in a BOM.|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/Howtoincludelabourcostina+BOM.]
You can substitute other costs for 'labour'.
All the best,
Kerstin

Finish good material not showed with 131 movement type in mfbf code in REM

Hi experts,
I am working in Repetitive manufacturing process, I have 6 operations in rate routing from which 6th operation is mile stone.
When i confirm last operation through MFBF, system shows components list with movement type 261 but finish material is not showing with movement type 131. The document no. is generated at the time of saving but in displayed document FG shows with 131mov. type and component list with 261.
Setting for REM are as follows
1. control key- pp03
2. production versions- maintained with standard REM profile
So my question is how can i see FG material in MFBF screen along with componets list ? What is the settings for this or any development is there ?
Regards,
Nitin Nerkar

Nitin,
System behavior is not wrong. What i understand from Backflush is, Back flushing is nothing but automatic goods issue. System will automatically posts the goods issue when you confirm the operations.You have no need to make manual issue. It will reduce the effort.
Backflushing is automatic accounting (Goods issues - 261 mvt) of material consumed for production, at the time of confirmation.
When you use auto goods receipt indicator then at the time of confirmation system will do auto GR. In normal discrete mfg scenario, when you are doing confirmation when you click on GOOD MOVEMENT tab you will get GI as well as GR with movement type.
But in REM scenario you doing MFBF (REM Backflush) means This activity executes multiple activities in a single step, such as: finished product goods receipt, backflush of component materials, posting of costs to cost collector and creation of material and accounting documents. When you are doing MFBF and clicking on post with correction tab it will show you what are the components going to backflush, and that is ok. Here you are not going GOODS MOVEMENT tab to display GR.
I think this SAP system std behavior.
Tara

Sub storage location for Finished Goods Material

Hi MM Gurus,
In our organization, FG materials are physically stored under different sub areas, even though the same lies under single storage location in SAP. Currently the users are downloading the stock information into excel and allocating the mentioned physical storage areas
Since the option of creating further storage locations at the same level or going for warehouse management is not feasible for us, can we resolve this issue by going for any sub storage location (sub dividing the existing storage location into physically storage sub areas)?
Requst your valuable suggestions in this regard.
Thanks & Regards,
Vinod

Yes your requirement is possible and I have seen it working in one of our client. They named the sub storage location, as STORAGE BIN, and this storage bin data is stored in material master under storage location view. This input field is created with help of abap.
This way your storage location is distributed under sub storage locations namely storage bin, this way you can create areas of your storage location without turning on warehouse management and then assign materials to the storage location and then to storage bin, thus meeting your requirement.

Costing Report summarized production cost by Finished Goods Material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for