Costing run for materials with special procurement key

Hello,
Since moving to ECC6, the costing run for materials with special procurement keys is not pulling the marked price from the materials the special procurement keys point to. Only the released prices are pulled.
Example:
Material A, plant A has a future price (costing 2 tab) of 100 and a current price of 99
Material A, plant B has special procurement key Z1 (costing 1 tab) which pulls the costing from Material A, plant A
In our old system (46c) the costing run for Material A, plant B would pull 100.
In ECC6, the costing run for Material A, plant B pulls 99
Anyone that can push me in the right direction?

Hi,
Based on the info provided thus far, the result that you notice in ECC 6.0 is right as it is picking the current standard price based on your setup.
Now why it is picking the future price in 4.6c, well for that you will have to do a detail check as in which variant is being used etc. I would suggest you to work with your CO personnel on this. Do a costing run for this particular material via CK11n using the variant which you mentioned & see the results.
Or if you can upload the screenshots (picasaweb or some other portal) of the valuation variant you're using in 4.6c, along with Acctng view 1 & 2, costing view 1 & 2 details of the material it would help to have a better understanding.
Regards,
Vivek

Similar Messages

  • Costing run for materials

    Hi,
    We have product costing in our company (COPC). We have two production versions for one FG. Currently we have run the costing based on version 1. But from next month if I need to run the costing based on version 2, I need to know will it work if I save the cost estimate of version 2 from CK11N and run the costing from CK24? Will it update the cost of the FG for the next month based on version 2 ? If not please explain a way to do this.
    Many Thanks
    Oshani

    Hi Oshani,
    Yes. It should work. Just be sure you assign the Version 2 in CK11N (in the tab Qty Struct.).
    Check also that you version 2 is active (traffic light is green) in C223.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Mariano

  • Montly depreciation simulation does not run for asset with custom depr keys

    Hello!
    Some assets in report S_ALR_87012936 display annual depreciation simulation even if only a period of the year is selected. For those assets a custom depreciation keys is defined. Is that a problem?
    Could I found a way to simulate depreciation for a part of the year for those assets yet?
    Thanks
    Giovanna

    hi,
    ccheck your settings in trx. S_ALR_87009113
    A.

  • Transportation lane for special procurement key is flagged for deletion

    we are on SCM 7.0 and ECC 5.0 and transportation lane records are automatically created for items with special procurement keys (SPK). When we change an SPK, the old record is automatically being locked and flagged for deletion. This is causing planned orders in the old lane to not be replanned. it is therefore incorrectly indicating that a requiremnt is being met by the old planned receipt.
    The documentation indicates that the lane should be locked (not locked and flagged for deletion). When it is locked, the orders are deleted and replanned in the new lane as expected.  Can someone tell me if the correct behavior is for it to just be locked or to set to flagged for deletion? if it is supposed to be flagged for deletion, how do we delete the planned orders in the old lane without switching the record back to locked only?

    Hello,
    Please follow on the SAP Help library:
    Automatic Creation of Transportation Lanes
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/EN/d4/56ef1a5572544081619 a5f87f4055e/content.htm
    Change of Supplying Plant in the Special Procurement Type
    In the SAP R/3 system, if you have changed the supplying plant in the special procurement type, the SAP APO system creates a new transportation lane for the new supplying plant (from special procurement type) and material/plant combination. The already existing transportation lane and now invalid combination between supplying plant and receiving plant in the R/3 system is locked for orders in the SAP APO system. This can be recognized by the lock indicator X that is set by the system.
    Removal of Special Procurement Type from the Material Master Record
    If you have removed the special procurement type from the material master record in the SAP R/3 system, the SAP APO system locks the already created transportation lane so that it cannot be used in orders.
    Hope it helps in this matter.
    The best regards,
    Michel Bohn

  • Creation of Special Procurement keys

    Hi Gurus,
    I am about to create new procurement keys. Honestly, I am new into this task. I have to create new procurement keys with the requirement below.
    Material 1234 produced in plant A is now stored in plant B. From this new location (plant B) the materials need to be delivered to the customer (Plant C).
    The requirement of customer plant C is not created in plant B but it is created in plant A. So it must be created within Material Requirements Planning.
    As the material need to be shipped from Plant B, I need to create a requirement on this plant using SAP standard functionality. For this the special procurement key have to be maintained for Plant C.
    I really do not know how start with this one.
    Please help me.
    Thank you.
    Edited by: Mark Primus on Jul 16, 2010 11:04 AM
    Edited by: Mark Primus on Jul 16, 2010 11:05 AM

    Mark,
    It is not often that I hear of a plant being referred to as a 'customer'.
    I will assume that all material that is moved into plant B must be produced in plant A.
    You set two sp keys.  For plant C, create a key similar to SAP std 40, pointing to plant B
    For plant B, create a key similar to SAP std 40, pointing to plant A.
    Plant C has a shortage.  MRP runs in plant C.  It produces a Stock Transport Purchase req, pointing to plant B.  If stock exists in B, the STPurRq is converted to a Stock Transport order and the material is moved to C.
    Now, if Plant B has no stock or available inbound elements, then there is a shortage, since the STPurReq creates a requirement in B.  MRP runs in plant B.  It produces a Stock Transport Purchase req, pointing to plant A.  If stock exists in A, the STPurRq (A to B) is converted to a Stock Transport order and the material is moved to B.  The existing PurReq (B to C) is converted to a STO and the material is moved to C.
    If Plant A has no stock or available inbound elements, then there is a shortage.  MRP runs in plant A.  It produces a planned order or purchase req to a vendor. The material is obtained and placed into stock.  The STPurRq (A to B) is converted to a Stock Transport order and the material is moved to B.  The existing PurReq (B to C) is converted to a STO and the material is moved to C.
    MRP should be run in the proper sequence:  First C, then B, then A.  This can be automated by creating a 'Scope of Planning" (OM0E)
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • Special procurement keys

    Hi experts,
    what are the special procurement keys for MRP related consignments and MRP related sub-contarcting
    rgds
    Lakshmi Reddy

    HI
    Special procurement key for subcontracting:-30
    Special procurement key for consignment:---10
    These can be found in MRP2 view of material master record
    Hope this will help you
    Reward if useful
    Thanks and Regards
    SHYAM.R

  • Costing run for a material with alternative BOM

    Hi Friends,
    My requirement is to have product costing for a material with 3 different BOMs, in CK11N i can change the alternative BOM number to have costing run for 3 differesnt boms, but in ck24 how to proceed, My client requirement is such that the standard price should be the average price of the costing run from 3 different boms, and they are not interested in manual price change in MR21
    Regards,
    Arun Kumar R V

    Hi Arun,
    You can have a Standard cost estimate based on only one of the alternative BOM and Routing. This alternative is selected based on the business ie., whichever alternative is generally used in production frequently. This will be the std cost and whenever you do the production using the other alternatives, the difference in cost will be captured as Variance.
    There is no option of having average or cost estimate for each alternative at the same time.
    There is absolutely no use in maintaining price in MR21 for an in house produced material, since during Prod Order process the planned costs will be arrived at based on the quantity structure of BOM & Route only.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vijaya Bhaskar A
    Edited by: Vijaya Bhaskar A on Jan 7, 2009 8:57 AM

  • Special procurement key 10 for sales plant

    Hi Expert,
    We have one sales plant which normally used for trading activities but besides, sometimes we also have consignment process happen under this plant. Currently we don't maintain any value under sales procument key > MRP 2 view. My question is, can we maintain value 10=consignment as special procurement key? Is there any dependens config or data maintainance that we have to look into if this value maintained?
    Thanks/Regards,

    HI,
    You can maintain the special procurement key as10 based on which system will create a consignment PR when you execute a MRP.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Special procurement Key in APO

    How do I define in APO the special procurement key relationships between plants within the company or consignment/ subcontracting, just want to maintain the same relationship as in R/3. I know you answered about special procurement type U: stock transfer which I got it, could you please explain how I maintain the above Sp. procurement keys in APO.
    Thanks Mono
    Harish's reply:
    As far as i know you cant maintain Spl procurement keys in APO. This is used as an indicator in the material master for CIF and for creation of Transportation lanes in APO. So if you create manually more transportation lanes in APO to other source locations it will all be considered as sources of supply unlike in R3.

    Hi Mono
    Are you planning to run MRP in R3 and also plan in APO for the same materials. Depending on the sequence one of the runs is wasted
    you normally plan selected materials in APO  and the rest in R3
    You can use the X0 in product master for APO relevant indicator and CIF only these materials to APO and plan it here
    as for the spl procurement keys
    If you have a special producrement key in R3 the Transportation lanes are created automatically with the  correct source of supply or you can ensure you manually create this(and block or delete the others) so the planning  will be the same as it would be in  R3

  • Query related to Stock Transfer special procurement key.

    Hi PP Gurus,
    One conflict I got regarding to Special Procurement Key 40 (Stock transfer). Here in one plant material XYZ is getting produced in-house as well as procured from Alternate plant also.
    Initially I configured Spcl Prct key 40 taking XYZ (for example) in Demanding plant (say 1003) as externally procured through material master with spcl prct key 40 and Supplying plant (say 1001) In-house produced through material master.
    Now the requirement is to produce material XYZ In-house in Demanding plant (1003) as well as Stock transfer through Supplying plant (1001).
    As per my information for material handled through STO in Material master procurement type=F with splcl prct key=40 should be maintained in Demanding plant (1003)
    And
    In Supplying plant (1001) through Material master Procurement type= E without Spcl prct key= 40.
    If we change Procurement type from F to X in Demanding plant material master, does it support special procurement key and STO? Is it possible through some other solution? What could be the impact in Std. cost estimate and Product Cost Collector?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Abu Arbab

    Hi Alex,
    Thanks for valuable reply. SAP doesn't support Special procurement key for stock transfer with Procurement Type=X. I think two options one of the following options are suitable for such scenarios.
    1. Reply from SAP
    2. Quota Arrangement
    3. Creation if New material code and new production version for Semi-finished product in plant 1003. That is some what tedious. There is a valuable reply from Rajesha Vittal in this context to one of my last threads subjected [        Special Procurement Key- Withdrawl from alternate plant (40)|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forums]
    I let decision on Client whatever the way he wants will map the process through one of above options
    Here is the reply from SAP
    Normally for a material which is to be produced internally(inhouse production) and also procured externally the material type 'X' is used in the material master.
    Typically, If the material is sometimes produced in house and sometimes completly procured externally depending upon your capacity availability then the procurement type 'X' could ensure that you always have a
    planned order created in the planning(MRP run).Then you would have to decide later whether the material has to be produced in house or procured externally. If it has to be produced inhouse you could convert
    the planned order to Production/process order in MD04 else if the material is to be procured externally you could rater convert the planned order to a purchase requisition and then later could be
    converted to a purchase order.
    However kindly note that the special procurement type of stock transfer can not work with 'X' in standard, so even if you set the procument key to X in the material master it will not be read as the system will only
    look at the procument key of the special procurement type. This is also apparent in the warning message that you recieve when you set 'X' and 40in the material master: Message no. M3 675 ::The procurement type of the special procurement type is F.
    Unfortunately there is not a setting for X for the special procurement in the transaction OPPQ. To achieve this you will need to implement a modification. Please be aware that modifications are not supported by
    the support department of SAP.
    Workaround:
    Typically, if you have such a scenario I would think that you would set this key for the majority of the transactions, ie, 90% of the time this material is truly stock transferred. However if you have to decide laterwhether the material has to be produced in house or stock transfer you could plan it as type 'X' without the special procurement key and later in MD04 convert the planned order and change the material master back again.
    Or you may set procurement type 'E' and create PO manually for stock
    transfer.
    Best Regards,
    Abu Arbab
    Edited by: abu arbaba on Dec 2, 2008 10:06 AM

  • Automatic STO for materials with split valuation

    Hey Gurus,
    Our client uses plant-to-plant STO to do transfers among internal plants. The current process: Run MRP in receiving plants --> MRP generates PReq --> Release PReq --> Assign Preq and create STO(from here, buyers manually check stock at issuing plant to see if there are "New" or "Rebuild" stock available, Rebuild stock always take the priority. Buyers manually assign Rebuild or New to ME21N).
    The client tries to automate the STO process, ie, using ME59 or ME59N instead of ME21N. The problem is how the system does stock check and automatically enters"Rebuild" or "New" for materials with Split Valuation, which are done by buyers manually?
    Thanks
    JM

    Hello,
    Your client's request can be met with an user exit i guess. I have not used this but this is a suggestion that you can try if you wish.
    The following things need to be done.
    1. New PR type needs to be created and assinged to the STO document type.
    2. When running a MRP at receiving plant, the system uses the special procurement key to create the STO requisition, hence we can write the relevant code in user exit in the MRP program. (please find the user exit for MD01)
    3. If the special procurement key is 40 in the material master (MRP view), then system has to create the PR using the new PR type for STO. Also for those PRs the default batch should be "Rebuilt" entered while creating the PR.
    4. As the batch is already entered in the PR, converting them to PO automatically will not be an issue.
    if you feel that the above solution is little tough to implement, then please write a program to fetch the STO PRs and update the PRs one by one using the BAPI PR update or BDC with the batch "Rebuilt". This program you can ask the users to run before using ME59.
    Regards,
    Sakthi

  • Cross company code Stock transfer - Special procurement Key

    Hi,
    Please clear my following doubts...
    1. We have two company codes, Company code: A1 having a Plant: AP1, Company code B1- Pant BP1,
    Finished goods sold from the plant AP1 are purchased from the plant BP1, so is there is any possibility to create a special procurement key having BP1 as the delivering plant and assign the key in AP1 materials.
    2. Can i combine the two plants AP1 and BP1 for total online planning (MD01) by creating a scope of planning indicator? and run a single MRP run for both plants at a time...
    Please clarify...
    Thanks,
    JK

    JK,
    I dont think Scope Planning is problem. You can create Scope of planning combining multiple plants, use transaction OM0E.
    I doubt on Special procurement key option for STO across cross company codes, as the special setting needed in that case would be that Plant as to be created as Vendor / Customer. I would suggest to post this to MM forum for further response on this.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Costing Run for all Hub Plants

    I just want to understand from you regarding your Monthly Costing Run for all Plants.Actually we have Plant 5000 (Ruwais) which is our Manufacturing Plant having BOM.
    We have two other Plants 7000 ( Shanghai ) and 7100 ( Singapore ) these are our Hub Plants not Manufacturing Plants and having no BOMs. 
    When we run our Monthly Costing Run for Plant 5000 using TCode (CK40N), it’s completes smoothly without any error.
    We have to create a material cost estimate in monthly basis using TCode (KKPAN) before we execute cost estimate for both Plants 7000 & 7100.
    We see these runs at the months end as very time consuming and we are not manage on time set for such update in SAP as part of the month end procedure.

    Hello Yasir,
    In our system I see that PC01 and PC02 are the same for cross plant costing:
    1 - Future Cost Estimate - valid for fiscal year
    2 - Current Cost Estimate - no age restriction
    3 - Previous Cost estimate - no age restriction
    If your system is set this way, then for cross plant costing, it does not make a difference which one you use.
    If all plants are in one company code then the currency should be the same in all, so P rate should not be an issue.
    Take one part number: What period and FY is your current cost estimate? What are the validity dates?
    go to CK11n, input the part number; <b>hub plant</b> number and create cost estimate.
    On the Tab "QTY STRUCT."  you should see only Special procurement data, the plant number should be the mfg plant.
    Look at the Costing Structure.  Top level should be the part in hub plant.
    The first level below should be the part in the mfg plant.
    theTosts should be the same and I would expect it to be the same as the current cost estimate.  (Pay attention to the currency)
    If the first level from the mfg plant is not the same as the current cost estimate, you will need to figure out where that cost estimate is coming from.
    If you would like to send screen shots of your cost estimate screens, give me your e-mail and I will contact you with pictures of what I expect to see.
    Althea

  • Costing run for the material in Physical distribution Plant

    Hi experts,
    There's a material both creates in productoin plant 1000 & physical distribution plant 1999. (same material number)
    However, BOM & routing only create in prodution plant 1000.
    How do we copy BOM & routing (in prodution plant) for the material creates in Physical distribution Plant and excute costing run for it? (we need to excute costing run every month, so standard cost for the material in productoin plant 1000 & physical distribution plant 1999 needs to be the same every month.)
    Thanks in advance.

    HI AO
    1. There is no standard feature to copy the BOM/Routing from Plant 1 to 2...
    While creating in PLant 2, you can give the reference of Plant 1.. Or you can use some BAPIs to do the same
    2. If you want same std cost in Plant 2 as in Plant 1, then easier way would be to create a Special Procurement Key and assign the same in Material master - Costing View of Plant 2 (1999)
    Follow the steps below
    1. Go to OMD9
    2. Click on New entries: Enter your Plant = Plant 2 (receiver plant) "SP Pr Type" = Z1 and Proc Type = F;
    3. Under Special Procurement Secrion
    Enter U as special procurement and Plant 1 in the Plant Field (Transferring plant)
    4. Save this entry, and in Mat Master of Plant 2, specify Z1 as Special proc key in Costing view (NOT MRP VIEW)
    5. Run CK11N in Plant 2... and release from CK24
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Extractor 0CO_PC_PCP_03: diferent costing runs for the same material

    Hi, experts.
    We are extracting data with 0CO_PC_PCP_03 extractor, but some materials do not return any record.
    If we use CO standard transactions, we can get the values for all materials, but with the extractor just few materials are returned.
    We are filtering the extractor with the costing run name and costing run date, but some materials are not extracted.
    This is occurring for a specific month only. We have extracted data for other months / costing runs and the same materials appears in CO transaction and in extractor result. The different thing with this problematic month is that there are other costing runs of the same type (costing variant), for a higher date.
    It seems like the extractor just can extract the last costing run for a material / month. Any idea?
    Thanks,
    Henrique Teodoro

    Hello,
    I have an update in my findings. Few days ago, R/3 user ran a new costing run for a set of materials, using the same costing variant / costing version used one year ago. And now, when I extract the costing run created one year ago, materials present in recently run set don´t appear anymore. I ran this same costing run weeks ago and the material are ok. After the new costing run with the same costing variant / costing version, they are gone from extraction.
    Seems like this extraction just can return the last costing variant / costing version for each material. Or maybe the table key that stores this data are costing variant / costing version, instead of costing run / costing run date.
    Anybody have any knowledge or experience on this?
    Thanks,
    Henrique

Maybe you are looking for