Costing run for MRP-MPN set

Hai,
I am using MPN concept in my process.
Here I am getting one problem while going for Costing Run.
1. In BOM component for FERT is maintained as leading part. on which there is no Inventory maintained or no value for this material in Material Master so in costing run it is taking that value.
2. How costing run consider the MPN materials for Costing.
Thank & regards
KM

Hi,
Normally while creating the material master, we will maintain some approximate value in the accounting view. Then later while running the cost estimation, it will explode the BOM, routing it will calculate the BOM item component costs and the activity costs and the same it will update in the costing 2 view. This is the concept of standard cost estimation.
MPN material is the manufacturer part no. While procuring the component or while supplying the components to the supplier we need to supply the material as per their material no we need to supply them or procure them. But for our easy handling or to follow our own system we will me maintain the different material no. This 2 things we need to link MPN profile and the MPN material no. When u order your own material, the system in turn will create a purchase order with the vendor material no. This is the MPN material logic.
regards,
V. Suresh

Similar Messages

Costing Run for all Hub Plants

I just want to understand from you regarding your Monthly Costing Run for all Plants.Actually we have Plant 5000 (Ruwais) which is our Manufacturing Plant having BOM.
We have two other Plants 7000 ( Shanghai ) and 7100 ( Singapore ) these are our Hub Plants not Manufacturing Plants and having no BOMs.
When we run our Monthly Costing Run for Plant 5000 using TCode (CK40N), its completes smoothly without any error.
We have to create a material cost estimate in monthly basis using TCode (KKPAN) before we execute cost estimate for both Plants 7000 & 7100.
We see these runs at the months end as very time consuming and we are not manage on time set for such update in SAP as part of the month end procedure.

Hello Yasir,
In our system I see that PC01 and PC02 are the same for cross plant costing:
1 - Future Cost Estimate - valid for fiscal year
2 - Current Cost Estimate - no age restriction
3 - Previous Cost estimate - no age restriction
If your system is set this way, then for cross plant costing, it does not make a difference which one you use.
If all plants are in one company code then the currency should be the same in all, so P rate should not be an issue.
Take one part number: What period and FY is your current cost estimate? What are the validity dates?
go to CK11n, input the part number; hub plant number and create cost estimate.
On the Tab "QTY STRUCT." you should see only Special procurement data, the plant number should be the mfg plant.
Look at the Costing Structure. Top level should be the part in hub plant.
The first level below should be the part in the mfg plant.
theTosts should be the same and I would expect it to be the same as the current cost estimate. (Pay attention to the currency)
If the first level from the mfg plant is not the same as the current cost estimate, you will need to figure out where that cost estimate is coming from.
If you would like to send screen shots of your cost estimate screens, give me your e-mail and I will contact you with pictures of what I expect to see.
Althea

Costing run for the material in Physical distribution Plant

Hi experts,
There's a material both creates in productoin plant 1000 & physical distribution plant 1999. (same material number)
However, BOM & routing only create in prodution plant 1000.
How do we copy BOM & routing (in prodution plant) for the material creates in Physical distribution Plant and excute costing run for it? (we need to excute costing run every month, so standard cost for the material in productoin plant 1000 & physical distribution plant 1999 needs to be the same every month.)
Thanks in advance.

HI AO
1. There is no standard feature to copy the BOM/Routing from Plant 1 to 2...
While creating in PLant 2, you can give the reference of Plant 1.. Or you can use some BAPIs to do the same
2. If you want same std cost in Plant 2 as in Plant 1, then easier way would be to create a Special Procurement Key and assign the same in Material master - Costing View of Plant 2 (1999)
Follow the steps below
1. Go to OMD9
2. Click on New entries: Enter your Plant = Plant 2 (receiver plant) "SP Pr Type" = Z1 and Proc Type = F;
3. Under Special Procurement Secrion
Enter U as special procurement and Plant 1 in the Plant Field (Transferring plant)
4. Save this entry, and in Mat Master of Plant 2, specify Z1 as Special proc key in Costing view (NOT MRP VIEW)
5. Run CK11N in Plant 2... and release from CK24
Regards
Ajay M

MRP - Transaction WC27 Batch Run for MRP

Each day we run WC27 as a background program. We have it configured to define the scope of planning (all of the plants that we want MRP to run). We also have a user exit key. The user exit parameters, is a set group of specific MRP controllers. Materials (part numbers) that have this specific MRP controller should run the MRP control parameters for Scheduling = 2.
The other parameters are as follows:
Processing Key = NETPL
Create Purchase Req = 1
Schedule lines =3
Create MRP list = 1
Planning Mode = 3
We currently see each day, materials (part numbers) that the routing was changed to a different work center using CEWB. However, when the background job runs for MRP (WC27), it does not update the planned orders with the new routing work center change for the material (part number) that has an MRP controller specific for the scheduling parameter set to 2. Why would our MRP run not change the planned order? If, I run MD02, it does update the planned orders. So why is not changing it in the batch run? It is causing issues with our end users running CM25 for a specific work center.

Hi,
a.     Please check if the material in question has the Planning file entry u2013 through MD21
b.     If the planning file entry is not seen, create Planning file entries using MD20 or MDAB
c.     Run MRP (MD01 or WC27) with Planning mode as 3 or 2, and check if your changes have got effected into the Planned orders.
When we use Net-change planning at the Plant level, the system checks for the presence of Planning file entriesu2026 and whichever material has undergone some changes relevant for MRP, and thus having the planning file entries are covered during the MRP run.
Workcenter or Routing changes do not result in creating Planning file entry.
At the same time, when we execute planning for the material level (MD02), the planning run does not refer to the Planning file entry and hence the planning run changes the Planned order master data.
Kindly refer to the definition below..
u2018In net change planning only those materials are planned for which the net change planning indicator in the planning file has been set as a planning file entry. The system usually sets the indicator automatically as soon as a change is made to the material that is relevant to MRP.
The following changes cause an entry in the planning file to be made:
u2022     Changes to stock, if these change the stock/requirements situation of the material
u2022     Creation of purchase requisitions, purchase orders, planned orders, sales requirements, forecast requirements, dependent requirements or reservations
u2022     Changing to fields that are relevant to the planning run for these receipts and issues or in the material master
u2022     Deleting receipt or issue quantities
u2022     If you have changed the settings of an MRP type, a lot-sizing procedure or a purchasing department processing time in Customizing, the materials that are affected by these changes thus have no planning file entry and are not included automatically in the net change planning. To enable the changes made to take effect, you choose regenerative planning in the initial screen of the planning run or make an entry manually in the planning file.
Please refer to the links u2013
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d3f9344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d3f9344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d3f9344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d3f9344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d3f9344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d3f9344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Thanks
Senthil

Extractor 0CO_PC_PCP_03: diferent costing runs for the same material

Hi, experts.
We are extracting data with 0CO_PC_PCP_03 extractor, but some materials do not return any record.
If we use CO standard transactions, we can get the values for all materials, but with the extractor just few materials are returned.
We are filtering the extractor with the costing run name and costing run date, but some materials are not extracted.
This is occurring for a specific month only. We have extracted data for other months / costing runs and the same materials appears in CO transaction and in extractor result. The different thing with this problematic month is that there are other costing runs of the same type (costing variant), for a higher date.
It seems like the extractor just can extract the last costing run for a material / month. Any idea?
Thanks,
Henrique Teodoro

Hello,
I have an update in my findings. Few days ago, R/3 user ran a new costing run for a set of materials, using the same costing variant / costing version used one year ago. And now, when I extract the costing run created one year ago, materials present in recently run set don´t appear anymore. I ran this same costing run weeks ago and the material are ok. After the new costing run with the same costing variant / costing version, they are gone from extraction.
Seems like this extraction just can return the last costing variant / costing version for each material. Or maybe the table key that stores this data are costing variant / costing version, instead of costing run / costing run date.
Anybody have any knowledge or experience on this?
Thanks,
Henrique

Creating Costing Run for Multiple Plants

Hi,
Is it possible to create a costing run for multiple company codes in a controlling area, instead of creating separate costing runs for each company code?
Thank-You

Christian,
I understood it and my answer is for different company codes.I did it for one of my client.
Let me review the scenario on system.
Traci,
I will get back to you on this by Tuesday(2nd March).
Thanks.Ashok
Edited by: Ashok Raut on Feb 26, 2010 1:34 PM
Edited by: Ashok Raut on Feb 26, 2010 2:31 PM

Costing run for materials with special procurement key

Hello,
Since moving to ECC6, the costing run for materials with special procurement keys is not pulling the marked price from the materials the special procurement keys point to. Only the released prices are pulled.
Example:
Material A, plant A has a future price (costing 2 tab) of 100 and a current price of 99
Material A, plant B has special procurement key Z1 (costing 1 tab) which pulls the costing from Material A, plant A
In our old system (46c) the costing run for Material A, plant B would pull 100.
In ECC6, the costing run for Material A, plant B pulls 99
Anyone that can push me in the right direction?

Hi,
Based on the info provided thus far, the result that you notice in ECC 6.0 is right as it is picking the current standard price based on your setup.
Now why it is picking the future price in 4.6c, well for that you will have to do a detail check as in which variant is being used etc. I would suggest you to work with your CO personnel on this. Do a costing run for this particular material via CK11n using the variant which you mentioned & see the results.
Or if you can upload the screenshots (picasaweb or some other portal) of the valuation variant you're using in 4.6c, along with Acctng view 1 & 2, costing view 1 & 2 details of the material it would help to have a better understanding.
Regards,
Vivek

Costing run for a material with alternative BOM

Hi Friends,
My requirement is to have product costing for a material with 3 different BOMs, in CK11N i can change the alternative BOM number to have costing run for 3 differesnt boms, but in ck24 how to proceed, My client requirement is such that the standard price should be the average price of the costing run from 3 different boms, and they are not interested in manual price change in MR21
Regards,
Arun Kumar R V

Hi Arun,
You can have a Standard cost estimate based on only one of the alternative BOM and Routing. This alternative is selected based on the business ie., whichever alternative is generally used in production frequently. This will be the std cost and whenever you do the production using the other alternatives, the difference in cost will be captured as Variance.
There is no option of having average or cost estimate for each alternative at the same time.
There is absolutely no use in maintaining price in MR21 for an in house produced material, since during Prod Order process the planned costs will be arrived at based on the quantity structure of BOM & Route only.
Thanks & Regards,
Vijaya Bhaskar A
Edited by: Vijaya Bhaskar A on Jan 7, 2009 8:57 AM

Costing run for co-product

Hi friend,
I have 5 different finished materials each having 2 same co-products. i could do the costing run for the finished materials, but how to the costing run and standard cost estimate ( i.e ck11n and ck40n) for the 2 co-products. the co-products does not have BOM and routing.
Regards,
Arun kumar R V

Hi
Sub Co-Product will be costed based on 'Apportionment and Source structure' which is maintained in Main Co-product material master.
For example material 'A' has two co-products 'B' and 'C'.
BOM and Routing will be maintained for material 'A' only.
(BOM will contains 'Rawmaterials as well as co-products')
In Material Master of 'A' we have to maintain how to apportion this Qty structure of A to B and C also.For which we required source structure which is need to create in IMG.
Regards,
Velmurugan S

Cost Run for Raw Material taking Standard Price instead of Moving Price

Hi all,
We ran a material costimate with normal components FG>SFG>RM. The RM price Control is set to
V (Moving Average Price) and for SFG & FG it is S(Std. Price). After we run CK11N, the price for
RM in Material Master changes as per Moving Price. We found that the RM Component is
costed based on Standard Price and not on the previous cost run Moving Average Price. After
certain period, if we again do cost run, the sytem is again picking up the standard price for costing
not the revised Moving Price. We have checked the Valuation Variant in the Costing Variant, where the strategy given is 1. Moving Average Price 2. Standard Price. We also tried to change the
sequence as 1. Price as per Purchase Info Record 2. Moving Average Price and 3. Standard Price and
also 1. Standard Price and 2. Moving Average Price. Our requirement is when we run the cost estimate the raw material has to pick the price of previous moving price stored in the Material Master. Kindly tell us where to set the indicator.
Thanks,
Sadashivan

Hi Srikanth,
Problem solved. I checked the sequence in Valuation Variant and modified in Valuation Variant for Plant which I have not set previously and now the system is working correctly.
Thanks,
Sadashivan

Costing Run for Configurable Material

Hi,
When I try to run costing run CK40N for KMAT material, I am geting information "No materials selected" for the 'selection' flow-step.
Below is the Error description.
No materials selected
Message no. CK277
Diagnosis
Due to the costing variant used, no materials could be selected for the cost estimate.
System Response
No materials were selected.
Procedure
1. First, check that the materials you want to cost exist.
2. Then go into Customizing and check the costing variant, the reference variant, and the transfer control. If the plant changes, a suitable transfer strategy must be entered in the transfer control belonging to the reference variant.
Thanks in Advance,
Shiva

hi Shiva,
It is not possible to do the cost calculation for configurable materials in CK40N or CK11N.
To do the product costing it is mainly required the BOM and Routing, but in case of configurable materials the BOM and Routing are not fixed(here Super BOM/Super Routing are used with valid object dependencies which may result in "n" number of material variants)
To do the costing for configurable material you can use t code - CU50 (configuration simulation)
Here in CU50 you can select the characteristics values which ultimately selects the valid BOM and Routing required for variant production and do the costing and check.
Please check
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/7e/cb857b43a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Pavan
Edited by: Pavanakumar on Jun 29, 2009 4:34 PM

Delivery Schedules not created after MRP Run for MRP Type PD

HI All,
I have created Schduling Agreement, maintained Source List with MRP Relevant - 2 option and maintained Vendor as Fix, maintained info record.
I have created a material with MRP type as PD and lot size as EX, and strategy group as MTS. Now when i enter requirement through MD61 and do MRP Run through MD02, system is generating PR instead of Del Schdule line inspite of schduling agreement.
But If i change MRP type to VB and maintain reorder point and maintain min lot size, then system generates Del Schdule lines for the same material.
What could be the reason. I want delivery schedules based on MRP Type PD.
Where I am wrong in MRP Views or in any cutomization. It seems that purchasing part is fine since it creats scudles line so no problem in SA or in Source List.
Please help
Regards,
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Go through this link you will able to customize correctly
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/3b/66596eda7b11d1b6330000e8a738dc/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/f4/7d2da044af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Cheers
Kris

Costing run for materials

Hi,
We have product costing in our company (COPC). We have two production versions for one FG. Currently we have run the costing based on version 1. But from next month if I need to run the costing based on version 2, I need to know will it work if I save the cost estimate of version 2 from CK11N and run the costing from CK24? Will it update the cost of the FG for the next month based on version 2 ? If not please explain a way to do this.
Many Thanks
Oshani

Hi Oshani,
Yes. It should work. Just be sure you assign the Version 2 in CK11N (in the tab Qty Struct.).
Check also that you version 2 is active (traffic light is green) in C223.
Thanks and Regards,
Mariano

Costing run for material - std. cost estimate

Hi all,
The scenario is as below:
I have a material (halb). I have maintained a BOM. Now, i donot have a routing, but i just use a reference operation set.
In this case, when i run the standard cost estimate (t code CK11N), the master data is read. But, since no routing exists, so the activity costs wont be read. So what should be done in this case, so that the costs as per the activity in ref. operation set is also captured?
Shrenik

Shrenik,
If the Referance Operation Set is standard and same is going to be used always, please enter that details of the Ref. Opn Set in the costing 1 view of the material master under Quantity structure data.
Regards,
Prasobh

How to calculate fixed cost for by-product in costing run?

Dear,
We want to have some fixed cost calculated for by-product B in costing run.
Our current practise, we only calculate the delivery cost as variable cost for this by-product B in the costing run for B. The by-product B is a component in the BOM of finish product A.
However, we need some fixed cost to be countered in for by-product B, which can be by controlled by us.
Any thought?
Thank you all in advance.
Christina.

Dear,
You have to maintain BOM Usage-Costing-6 i.e., Costing BOM with all your required Fixed Cost related Material components and assign it in the by-product Material Master to include the Fixed Cost in by-product Standard Cost Estimate. Based on this setting, system will calculate Standard Cost Estimate with this Fixed Cost and display in the related reports.
Regards
appalas

Costing run for MRP-MPN set

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for