CPIO backup for more than 2 gb files

Hi
I have installed ECC6 on AIX 6.1 with oracle 10g.
I want to take cpio backup , but some files are more than 2 gb, can not copy through cpio.
any option is there in cpio for backup files more than 2gb?
I dont't want to use tar.
regards
vijay.

Vijay,
The cpio command is not enabled for files greater than 2GB in size due to limitations imposed by XPG/4 and POSIX.2 standards.
cpio does not preserve the sparse nature of any file that is sparsely allocated. Any file that was originally sparse before the restoration will have all space allocated within the filesystem for the size of the file.
[http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.aix.cmds/doc/aixcmds1/cpio.htm]
check following link for detailed info.
Hope this helps.
Manoj

Similar Messages

"Finishing Backup" for more than 24 hours. Took 3 day to get there

Something's obviously not right with my Time Capsule.
The 200GB backup took 3 days (over WiFi... I know... I know... should've done by Ethernet but I was already halfway through when I considered that option).
Now for more than 24 hours it has been "Finishing Backup". I have the latest time capsule updates.
Anyone knows a solution for this?
Thank you in advance

I saw something similar when I hooked up the Time Capsule to be the main internet router (dropping the internet connection and generally poor performance). I have a couple of the older Airport Extremes (Fast Ethernet) so I took one of the older Extremes and set it up as the main router (connected to cable modem) and just hung the TC off of that one via ethernet. Things seem must better now. I'm seeing backup speeds now in the 5-8 MB/s with my MacBook Pro connected directly to the TC via ethernet. Only trouble is I've not gotten a successful backup yet in multiple attempts over the last 5 days. Gets several GB into it and errors out saying it couldn't copy files to the backup volume. My wife's 20" iMac completed it's backup successfully on the very first try, over wireless no less (802.11n). I'm just about ready to chuck this thing.
-Terry

Can Time Machine perform encrypted backups for more than one computer to the same external drive?

I have two MBPs. The older MBP, with 1TB of storage, now contains two other MBP clones, for a total of 3 user machines on 1 MBP). I'd like to back up both my newest MBP, and the older MBP with the 2 clones, to my new 5TB drive (via wi-fi). I want to encrypt these backups, but am unclear whether it is possible. Does TM first encrypt the drive itself, or is each back up separately encrypted? I understand that if I wanted to encrypt an existing Time Matters backup on a drive, the prior data would be erased and reformatted, but here I am working with a new backup drive, on which one encrypted backup has been performed.
I just don't want to overwrite this existing backup (which was for my newest MBP).
Thanks for whatever help anyone can provide.

You should have prepared the drive better..
The drive should have been partitioned. It is possible to load the backups.. but you can get into trouble.
See http://pondini.org/TM/4.html
Since partitioning at this point would destroy the existing backup.. the best way is to setup a disk image for each of the other Macbook backups and then mount the disk image and use that for the TM backup..
Encrypting the drive or the backup.. that is something I avoid.. backups to me are useless if I forget or lose the key.. apple have warned lose the key.. the backup is useless..
But check pondini FAQ .. you might be able to encrypt a drive image.. or the backup.
http://pondini.org/TM/FAQ.html
See Q25 and 31.

Can Time Machine backups for more than one Mac be sent to the same external hard drive?

It's pretty straightforward, really. We have two Macs, both running Mountain Lion. Can we use the same external hard drive for Time Machine backups of both?

It would be best to partition the HDD - one volume for each Mac (you cannot partition a Time Capsule).
Note that by doing so, you will lose both backups should the drive fail.

More than 1 million files on multi-terabyte UFS file systems

How do you configure a UFS file system for more than 1 million files when it exceeds 1 terabyte? I've got several Sun RAID subsystems where this is necessary.

Thanks. You are right on. According to Sun official channels:
Paula Van Wie wrote:
Hi Ron,
This is what I've found out.
No there is no way around the limitation. I would suggest an alternate
file system if possible suggest ZFS as they would get the most space
available as inodes are no longer used.
Like the customer noted if the inode values were increased significantly
and an fsck were required there is the possibility that the fsck could
take days or weeks to complete. So in order to avoid angry customers
having to wait a day or two for fsck to finish the limit was imposed.
And so far I've heard that there should not be corruption using zfs and
raid.
Paula

PSE8 Backup/Synchronization not working for more than a month

1. Reconnecting files shows that a file is not connected; however, no file is listed. How do I find missing file's properties.
2. Backup/synchronization preferences works fine.
3. I can select one or more or the whole catalog.
4. The twirly icons show next to the album(s) for a second or show but then the synced icon remains in album/albums.
5. I click OK and after the hour glass shows a while, it finishes.
6. I click on icon and see that sychronization is on.
7. If I check (unsynced items, synced items, or items marked for sync) it shows nothing and says that none of those choices matches.
8. I have repaired and reindexed countless times (never has there been a "repair" problem.
9. I click on optimize and that works.
10. After that I notice "generating thumb nails" and the twirly thing moving. I've let it generate thumbnails for more than 24 hours and it's still going.
I have spent countles hours during day and night, and I can't get it to work.
I noticed that someone wrote that he had a similar problem that began with his using the IPAD. And I started using the IPAD also, but I couldn't sync my files with photoshop.com before that.
Customer service and Help provides me with no answers. What should I do?

Hi clairenanak:
Sorry to hear about the troubles.
On your #1, you may have disconnected files of media types that are not visible. To ensure that all media types are visible, go to View > Media Types, and check any items that are not currently checked. Then try the Reconnect.
As far as backup/sync not working, disconnected files can stop sync from working.
After resolving the disconnected files issue, let us know if sync is not working. We may need to look at the sync log to determine why.
As for the Organizer constantly generating thumbnails, this could indicated that you have many files, for example 10,000, in your catalog.
If you have many files in your catalog, then you may need to just wait for the process to finish.
It may also indicate a problem with the thumbnail cache that can't be repaired by the Optimize command.
You can manually reset this file by doing the following:
Determine the name of your Elements Organizer catalog.
The name of the catalog appears in the lower-left of the Organizer.
    Alternatively, you can open the Organizer and then click File > Catalog. The name of the catalog will show in the list at the bottom with " [current]" after it.
Close the Elements Organizer.
Navigate in Windows Explorer to the folder that contains your catalog. Here are the default locations:
   Windows 7 or Vista: C:\ProgramData\Adobe\Elements Organizer\Catalogs\<CATALOG NAME>
Click Start, type "%ProgramData%" (including the quotation marks) into the Start Search, and then press Enter.
Open each folder in the above structure until you have opened the catalog folder.
   Windows XP: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\Adobe\Elements Organizer\Catalogs\<CATALOG NAME>
Choose Start > Run, type "%AllUsersProfile%\Application Data" (including the quotation marks) in the Open text box, then press Enter or click OK.
Open each folder in the above structure until you have opened the catalog folder.
   NOTE: Replace <CATALOG NAME> with the name of the catalog that you determined in Step 1 above.
There should be a file called thumb.5.cache, which is the thumbnail cache. Delete this file.
The next time you open the Elements Organizer, the thumbnail cache will begin to rebuild. This may take some time, depending on the number of files you have in the catalog.
HTH

I've been using iMovie '09 for more than a year and now .MTS files won't upload?

I've been using iMovie '09 for more than a year and each time I would plug in my SD card (using a card reader) the import box would open and I could select the clips I wanted to work with. Now, suddenly, today the import box won't open. Why??? I literally just used the exact same method three weeks ago and it worked fine. I have not done anything differently. Also, when I go to "file > import from camera" it only shows the built-in camera. What am I doing wrong? And how do I get my files? I do not want to download a converter of any time. I know there has to be a way because it literally just worked three weeks ago so I'm just trying to figure out why it won't work now.

Unfortunately, you cannot upgrade to Safari 5 or 6 on Mac OSX 10.4.11 and that is what you need to access iCloud (http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4759). I am not sure, but maybe you can install another and newer browser version of Firefox or Chrome to access iCloud.

Is there a case for creatiing more than on flat file sourece system in BI 7

Hello BI/BW Friends:
What are the Best practices / recommendations for the number of
flat file interfaces, Flat file source systems to be created in a BI/BW system.
I need to load 20 flat files into a BI 7.0 system.
Is there a best practice in this case?
Is there a case for more that one Flat File source systems being created to increase the speed or
parallel extraction of these flat files?
Am I creating any system contention by trying to extract all 20 of these files through the same flat file source system?
Any and all comments are appreciated.
Regarcs,
Joey G.
856 912 1136

You don't need to create several Flatfile source systems for several files uploading, One would do
You can parallelize the loads with one file source , For performance point of view it's the same even you create several file sources or with one, the only thing you will have to concern is to fine tune the routines if any , load MD and then TD
If you have several file sources, You may get confusion and has to maintain them across the landscape.
Best practice would be upload all the files in application server and automate the loads thru process chains.

I am trying to copy more or less 30G from my MacbookPro to an external hard drive and it is stuck in the "preparing to copy" step. But that for more than one hour. What should I do to make it faster? Thanks a lot in advance!

I am trying to copy more or less 30G from my MacbookPro to an external hard drive and it is stuck in the "preparing to copy" step. But that for more than one hour. What should I do to make it faster? Thanks a lot in advance!

Thanks Shootist007, by blockd files I mean files that I have changed to blocked and when I tried to move then for the first time, I had to unblock again. I am trying to backup my pictures, my songs and other files like word documents and excel tables. First I put all of them as blocked, what caused the first problems on trying to move them. Then, I've unchecked the block option and if I try to move one by one, there is no problem. The issue is to move all together, because it gets stuck in the preparing to copy files step. Anyway, if I cannot do all by once, I'll do it one by one, event though that was not suposed to happen if we are talking about technology, right? Anyway, I thank you again for trying to help me!

Attach Database running for more than 2 days

Hi,
I have a sql sever 2005 database of SAP development which is having a deferred transaction error while DBCC. After restart the SQL log says the below. Still the DBCC error exists.
2013-04-19 14:27:22.10 spid14s Recovery of database 'BDS' (5) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 2 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-04-19 14:27:22.10 spid14s 1830496 transactions rolled forward in database 'BDS' (5). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-04-19 14:27:22.71 spid14s Recovery of database 'BDS' (5) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 3 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2013-04-19 14:27:23.34 spid14s CHECKDB for database 'BDS' finished without errors on 2012-10-14 19:22:43.603 (local time). This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
I have copied the mdf, ndf and ldf file to another location and try to attach the database it is running for more than 2 days now. Still not given any error. DVM shows the create database status as running. The SQL Log shows the below
message.
2014-03-29 19:19:52.04 spid52 Recovery of database 'BDS' (8) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 2 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2014-03-29 19:19:52.04 spid52 5313464 transactions rolled forward in database 'BDS' (8). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2014-03-29 19:19:52.29 spid52 Recovery of database 'BDS' (8) is 99% complete (approximately 3 seconds remain). Phase 3 of 3. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Please help me to solve this issue.
Regards,
suren

>I have copied the mdf, ndf and ldf file to another location and try to attach the database it is running for more than 2 days now.
It is safer to:
1. Backup the database:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187510.aspx
2. Copy backup file over to destination server
3. Restore the database
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SELECT Video Tutorials 4 Hours
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

Hang on copy: "btrfs-transacti:282 blocked for more than 120 seconds."

Lately (at least after upgrading to linux 3.15), when I try to copy lots of files between btrfs partitions, I'm getting these "IO hangs" (not sure what to call it) where I can use the system fine as long as I don't try to read/write from my btrfs /home. So I can log in as root and look around, but as soon as I try and ls some random dir within my btrfs /home, it blocks and I have to log in from a different tty to use the system.
A "sudo journalctl -b-1 |grep -i btrfs" will show stuff like
juli 17 14:25:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa049fadf>] wait_current_trans.isra.18+0xcf/0x120 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:25:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa04a12d8>] start_transaction+0x3a8/0x5c0 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:25:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa04a1547>] btrfs_join_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:25:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa04a6dd3>] btrfs_dirty_inode+0x43/0xf0 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:25:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa04a6eff>] btrfs_update_time+0x7f/0xc0 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: INFO: task btrfs-transacti:282 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: btrfs-transacti D 0000000000000000 0 282 2 0x00000000
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa04b0df6>] btrfs_wait_and_free_delalloc_work+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa04bb128>] btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x1f8/0x2e0 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa04a0546>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x36/0xa20 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa049c475>] transaction_kthread+0x1e5/0x250 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: [<ffffffffa049c290>] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x5a0/0x5a0 [btrfs]
juli 17 14:35:54 arch kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc normal_work_helper [btrfs]
(see full paste at http://pastie.org/9399449)
There seems to be others with similar issues:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg34458.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs … 33795.html
but no solution from what I can tell.
It may be that it would unhang itself if I waited a really long while, but haven't had the patience to wait and see yet. I do run nightly backups between the btrfs partitions and the computer seems fine each morning though …
Anyone know what to do about this?
Last edited by unhammer (2014-07-17 13:49:55)

Same thing for me when running rsync... It also corrupted my filesystem. So I restored from a backup and I'm using XFS@LVM@dm-crypt for the time being.
https://imgur.com/a/6gNhH

Can we use same program ID for more than one RFC scenarios

Hi experts,
            I am working on a RFC to FILE scenario. I have created one TCP/IP connection in SM59 with a program ID. Can we use this program ID for more than one scenario. I have written code as below
data: iquote type standard table of ZIQMD initial size 0,
      IPRODUCT type standard table of ZPMS initial size 0,
      wa_quote type ZIQMD,
      wa_PRODUCT type ZPMS.
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_CBT_RFC_QUOTEMASTER'
TABLES
    I_QUOTE       = iquote          .
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_CBT_RFC_QUOTEMASTER' in background task DESTINATION
'ID4'
TABLES
    I_QUOTE       = iquote          .
COMMIT WORK.
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_CBT_RFC_PRODUCTMASTER'
TABLES
    IPRODUCT       = IPRODUCT          .
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_CBT_RFC_PRODUCTMASTER' in background task DESTINATION
'ID4'
TABLES
    IPRODUCT       = IPRODUCT          .
    COMMIT WORK.
when i am executing the code like this. i am able to send the data to 'Z_CBT_RFC_QUOTEMASTER' , but iam not getting data for 'Z_CBT_RFC_PRODUCTMASTER' interface. ID4 is the connection that i have created in SM59. with program ID as ABCD.
              Can i use the same connection for all interfaces.Please help in this, if we can use same connection for all interfaces. then how to make changes in XI.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Poorna.

Just tried this and I can confirm that my earlier understanding was correct!
One of my colleagues confused me out and the conclusion is,
1. You need a separate TCP IP Connection for every interface with a Unique program ID.
Regards
Bhavesh

I just updated to iOS 6 and now whenever I'm in an app for more than 5 minutes the app will close and I can't get back in it for 10 minutes. Can anyone help? Please?

Okay, so I just updated to the newest iOS 6 version on my iPod. And now I can't be in an app for more than 5 minutes without the app closing and I can't get back into the app for at least 10 minutes. Somebody, anybody please help me! This is getting really annoying!!! Please please please!

See:
iOS: Troubleshooting applications purchased from the App Store
Contact the developer/go to their support site if only one app.
Restore from backup. See:
iOS: How to back up
Restore to factory settings/new iPod

Cannot Get Mail for more than 5 accounts at a time

I have a total of 9 POP email accounts setup in Mail. The problem is that my dedicated server doesn't allow for more than 5 simultaneous send/receives per IP (which unfortunately cannot be changed). When I click on "Get Mail", I see it tries to get mail for all accounts at once, and I need to somehow change that within Mail. Ideally I need it to check accounts individually or, as you can do in Entourage, group it into send/receive schedules with 4 per group.
I am desperate, someone please help!

If App Store has an app that can make, e.g., zip archives of multiple photos, then it could help (you package a bunch of photos in a zip file, and then you send only one attachment; the zip file).
Disclaimer: I don't know the App Store apps nor the iPhone SDK well enough to know if such an app exists or if it is even possible.

How to create a Single Ear for more than 30 applications

Hai, any one please help me out
I created single ear for more than 30 different ejb projects
while deploying WAS giving error as follows;
Caught exception during application deployment from SAP J2EE Engine's deploy service:
java.rmi.RemoteException: Cannot store information about application sap.com/IntigratorEAR in the database during deploy.. Reason: Object value for entry "PROPS_STR_STR:ApplicationProperties" is too large. Limit is at 2,000 bytes.; nested exception is: com.sap.engine.frame.core.configuration.InvalidValueException: Object value for entry "PROPS_STR_STR:ApplicationProperties" is too large. Limit is at 2,000 bytes.
(message ID: com.sap.sdm.serverext.servertype.inqmy.extern.EngineApplOnlineDeployerImpl.performAction(DeploymentActionTypes).REMEXC)
Please help me out in this
with regards
somaraju

Hi,
I think this means that there is an object for your application properties with a size that exceeds the maximum size of the database field.
This is probably caused by the concatenation of all your properties of all your apps in the ear.
To solve this problem you can merge some applications to limit the amount of properties saved in the db.
A second solution could be to use different ear-files instead of 1 for all applications.
The third option is to find out how PROPS_STR_STR:ApplicationProperties is build up. Then you can limit the size of these properties.
Hope this explpanation is usefull.
Danny

CPIO backup for more than 2 gb files

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for